Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T20:15:22.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Beyond Bland: the BMA guidance on withholding/withdrawing medical treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2009

John Keown
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

In June 1999 the BMA published important guidance on the withholding/withdrawal of ‘medical treatment’, so defined as to include food and water delivered by tube. The guidance endorses the withholding/withdrawal of tube-delivered food and water not only from patients in pvs but also from other non-terminally ill patients such as those with severe dementia or serious stroke. The underlying justification for non-treatment appears (as in Bland) to be that such lives are not worth living and that it is right to end them by purposeful omission.

Published by the Medical Ethics Committee of the BMA, the guidance was prepared by a working group comprising nine of the Committee's twenty-five members and was written by three members of the BMA administrative staff. The Foreword states that a consultation exercise which the BMA had carried out in 1998, and which had generated over 2,000 responses, has revealed a need for guidance and that one of the most difficult issues was withholding/withdrawing tube-delivered food and water. Confusion had arisen from the fact that judicial guidance on this question related only to patients in pvs, and the BMA therefore wanted to provide guidance outlining the criteria to be applied in other conditions, such as advanced dementia or severe stroke. The guidance sought to ‘document the type of factors which should be taken into account, the process which should be followed and the safeguards which should be in place to ensure that these decisions, and decisions to withhold or withdraw other life-prolonging treatments, are made appropriately’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy
An Argument Against Legalisation
, pp. 239 - 259
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×