Aberdein, A. (2010). Virtue in Argument. Argumentation, 24, 165–79.Google Scholar

Aberdein, A. (2014). In Defense of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument Appraisal. Informal Logic, 34(1), 77–93.Google Scholar

Aikin, S. F. and Casey, J. P. (2016). Straw Men, Iron Men and Argumentative Virtue. Topoi, 35(2), 431–40.Google Scholar

Aikin, S. F. and Clanton, J. C. (2010). Developing Group Deliberative Virtues. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 27(4), 409–24.Google Scholar

Alcoff, L. M. (2010). Epistemic Identities. Episteme, 7(2), 128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amaya, A. (2018). The Virtue of Judicial Humility. Jurisprudence, 9(1), 97–107.Google Scholar

Anderson, E. (2012). Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 163–73.Google Scholar

Cohen, D. H., (2005). Arguments that Backfire, in D. Hitchcock, D. Far, (eds.), The Uses of Argument, OSSA, Hamilton, 58–65.Google Scholar

Cohen, D. H. (2007). Virtue Epistemology and Argumentation Theory, in Hanse, H. V. et al. (eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground, OSSA, Windsor, 1–9.Google Scholar

Cohen, D. H. (2009). Keeping an Open Mind and Having a Sense of Proportion as Virtues in Argumentation. Cogency, 1(2), 49–64.Google Scholar

Cohen, D. H. (2017). The Virtuous Troll: Argumentative Virtues in the Age of Technologically Enhanced Argumentative Pluralism. Philosophy and Technology, 30(2), 179–89.Google Scholar

Cooper, N. (1994). The Intellectual Virtues. Philosophy, 69(270), 459–69.Google Scholar

Cordell, S. (2017). Group Virtues: No Great Leap Forward with Collectivism. Res Publica, 23(1), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Correia, V. (2012). The Ethics of Argumentation. Informal Logic, 32(2), 222–41.Google Scholar

De Bruin, B. (2013). Epistemic Virtues in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 583–95.Google Scholar

Fricker, M. (2010a). Can There Be Institutional Virtues?, in Szabo, T. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 235–52.Google Scholar

Fricker, M., (2010b). Replies to Alcoff, Goldberb, and Hookway on Epistemic Injustice. Episteme, 7(2), 164–78.Google Scholar

Gensollen, M. (2017). El lugar de la teoría de la virtud argumentativa en la teoría de la argumentación contemporánea, Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación, 15, 41–59.Google Scholar

Harden Fritz, J. M. (2018). Communication Ethics and Virtue, in Snow, N. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Virtue, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Horowitz, P. (2009). Judicial Character and does It Matter. Constitutional Commentary, 26, 96–167.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Karpowitz, C. F. and Mendelberg, T. (2007). Groups and Deliberation. Swiss Political Science Review, 13(4), 645–62.Google Scholar

Lahroodi, R. (2007). Collective Epistemic Virtues. Social Epistemology, 21(3), 281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luskin, R. C., Sood, G., Fishkin, J. S., and Hahn, K. S. (2017). Deliberative distortions? Homogenization, polarization, and domination in small group deliberations. Unpublished manuscript from the Center for Deliberative Democracy, available at: https://cdd.stanford.edu/mm/2017/07/luskin-deliberative-distortions.pdf.Google Scholar

Montmarquet, A. J. (1993). Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Roberts, R. C. and West, R. (2015). Natural Epistemic Defects and Corrective Virtues. Synthese, 192(8), 2557–76.Google Scholar

Roberts, R. C. and Wood, W. J. (2007). Intellectual Virtues, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. L. and Church, I. M. (2015). When Cognition Turns Vicious: Heuristics and Biases in Light of Virtue Epistemology, Philosophical Psychology, 28(8), 1095–113.Google Scholar

Simon, D. (2004). A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision-Making, The University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 511–86.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E. (2009). What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. (2000). Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes, The Yale Law Journal, 110(1), 71–119.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. (2008). Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. and Hastie, R. (2015). Wiser: Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Group Smarter, Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar

Suroweicki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds: Why Many Are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economics, Societies and Nations, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Talisse, R. B. (2007). Why Democrats Need the Virtues, in Goodman, L. E. and Talisse, R. B. (eds.), Aristotle’s Politics Today, Albany: State University of New York Press, 45–52.Google Scholar

Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, R. J. and Pardo, M. (2007). The Problematic Value of Mathematical Models of Evidence, The Journal of Legal Studies, 36 (1), 107–40.Google Scholar

Allen, R. J. (1992). The Evolution of Hersay Rule to a Rule of Admission, Minnesota Law Review, 76, 797–812.Google Scholar

Allen, R. J. (1994). Factual Ambiguity and Theory of Evidence, Northwestern Law Review, 88, 604–34.Google Scholar

Allen, R. J. (2014). Burdens of Proof, Law, Probability and Risk, 13(3–4), 195–219.Google Scholar

Allen, R. J. (2016). The Hearsay Rule as a Rule of Admission Revisited, Fordham Law Review, 84, 1395–405.Google Scholar

Anderson, T., Twining, W. and Schum, D. A. (2005). Analysis of Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Brewer, S. (1996). Exemplary Reasoning: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Rational Force of Legal Argument by Analogy, Harvard Law Review, 109(5): 923–1028.Google Scholar

Brewer, S. (1998). Scientific Expert Testimony and Intellectual Due Process, Yale Law Journal, 107: 1535–681.Google Scholar

Brewer, S. (2017). The Logocratic Conception of Evidence as Argument. Manuscript.Google Scholar

Bulygin, E. (2015). Essays in Legal Philosophy. Bernal Pulido, C., Huerta Ochoa, C., Mazzarese, T., Moreso, J. J., Navarro, P. E. and Paulson, S. L., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burks, A. W. (1949). Icon, Index, and Symbol, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 9 (4), 673–89.Google Scholar

Canale, D. and Tuzet, G. (2009). The A Simili Argument: An Inferentialist Setting, Ratio Juris, 22 (4), 499–509.Google Scholar

Capone, A. and Poggi, F. (2016). Pragmatics and Law. Philosophical Perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capone, A. and Poggi, F. (2017). Pragmatics and Law. Practical and Theoretical Perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. M. (1977). Theory of Knowledge, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Coffa, J. A. (1991). The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap. To the Vienna Station. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, L. J. (1977). The Probable and the Provable. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Combs, N. A. (2010). Fact-Finding without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of International Criminal Convictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

CP, Collected Papers of C.S. Peirce C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss (vols. 1–6) and A. Burks (vols. 7–8), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931–58. (References by volume and paragraph number).Google Scholar

Dahlman, C. (2017). Unacceptable Generalizations in Arguments on Legal Evidence, Argumentation, 31 (1), 83–99.Google Scholar

Damaška, M. (1997). Evidence Law Adrift. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Ferrer, J. (2005). Prueba y verdad en el derecho, 2nd ed. Madrid: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar

Ferrer, J. (2007). La valoración racional de la prueba. Madrid: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar

Frank, J. (1949). Courts on Trial. Myth and Reality in American Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Gascón, M. (2010). Los hechos en el derecho. Bases argumentales de la prueba, 3rd ed. Madrid: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. (2005). Evidence. In Golding, M. P. and Edmundson, W. A. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 163–75.Google Scholar

Haack, S. (2004a). Truth and Justice, Inquiry and Advocacy, Science and Law, Ratio Juris, 17, 15–26.Google Scholar

Haack, S. (2004b). Epistemology Legalized: Or, Truth, Justice, and the American Way, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 49, 43–61.Google Scholar

Ho, H. L. (1999). A Theory of Hearsay, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 19, 403–19.Google Scholar

Jackson, J. D. and Summers, S. J. (2012). The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence. Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and Necessity, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lackey, J. (2008). Learning from Words. Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Laudan, L. (2006). Truth, Error, and Criminal Law. An Essay in Legal Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McJohn, S. M. (1993). On Uberty: Legal Reasoning by Analogy and Peirce’s Theory of Abduction, Willamette Law Review, 29, 191–235.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Misak, C. J. (1995). Verificationism. Its History and Prospects. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Misak, C. J. (2017). James on Religious Experience, Philosophical Inquiries, 5, 63–74.Google Scholar

Nance, D. A. (1988). The Best Evidence Principle, Iowa Law Review, 73, 227–97.Google Scholar

Pardo, M. S. and Allen, R. J. (2008). Juridical Proof and the Best Explanation, Law and Philosophy, 27, 223–68.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1953). From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1970). Philosophy of Logic, 2nd ed. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1976). The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, 2nd ed. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1934). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge, 1959.Google Scholar

Rescher, N. (1964). Introduction to Logic. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, P. and Zuckerman, A. (2010). Criminal Evidence, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1912). The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. (2003). Profiles, Probabilities, and Stereotypes. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Short, T. L. (2007). Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stein, A. (2005). Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Summers, R. S. (1999). Formal Legal Truth and Substantive Truth in Judicial Fact-Finding – Their Justified Divergence in Some Particular Cases, Law and Philosophy, 18, 497–511.Google Scholar

Taruffo, M. (1992). La prova dei fatti giuridici. Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar

Tuzet, G. (2016). La prova ragionata, Analisi e diritto, vol. 2016, 127–61.Google Scholar

Twining, W. (1984). Evidence and Legal Theory, Modern Law Review, 47, 261–83.Google Scholar

Twining, W. (2006). Rethinking Evidence. Exploratory Essays, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wigmore, J. H. (1913). The Principles of Judicial Proof Boston MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, R., eds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Notes for Lectures on ‘Private Experience’ and ‘Sense Data’, The Philosophical Review, 77, 275–320.Google Scholar

Ferrer Beltrán, J. (2007). La valoración racional de la prueba, Madrid; Barcelona; Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar

Frosini, B. V. (2002). La prove statistiche nel processo civile e nel processo penale, Milán: Giuffrè.Google Scholar

Garbolino, P. (2014). Probabilità e logica della prova, Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar

González Lagier, D. (2005). Quaestio Facti, Ensayos sobre prueba, causalidad y acción, Lima; Bogotá: Palestra.Google Scholar

Green, M. D., Freedman, D. M. and Gordis, L. (2011). Reference Guide on Epidemiology, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 3rd ed., Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar

Haack, S. (2014). Evidence Matters. Science, Proof and Truth in the Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaye, D. H. and Freedman, D. (2011). Reference Guide on Statistics, in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 3rd ed., Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar

MacCrimmon, M. and Tillers, P. eds. (2002). The Dynamics of Judicial Proof. Computation, Logic, and Common Sense, Heidelberg; New York: Physica Verlag.Google Scholar

Nieva Fenoll, J. (2010). La valoración de la prueba, Madrid; Barcelona; Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar

Taruffo, M. (2009). La semplice verità. Il giudice e la costruzione dei fatti, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar

Taruffo, M. (2012). La prova nel processo civile, Milan: Giuffre.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Tuzet, G. (2013). Filosofia della prova giuridica, Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore.Google Scholar

Twining, W. (2006). Rethinking Evidence. Exploratory Essays, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, R. J. and Pardo, M. S. (2019). Relative Plausibility and Its Critics, International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 23 (1–2), 5–59.Google Scholar

Amaya, A. (2015). The Tapestry of Reason, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Amaya, A. (2009). Inference to the Best Explanation, in Kaptein, H., Prakken, H. and Verheij, B. (eds.), Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories and Logic, Burlington: Ashgate, 135–59.Google Scholar

Ames, R. T. (2011) Confucian Role Ethics. A Vocabulary, Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar

Ames, R. T. and Rosemont, H. Jr. (1998). The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation, New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (1825). A Treatise on Judicial Evidence, Dumont, E. ed., London: J. W. Paget.Google Scholar

Brindley, E. (2011). Moral Autonomy and Individual Sources of Authority in the Analects, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38 (2), 257–73.Google Scholar

Bronaugh, R. (1998). Is There a Duty to Confess?, American Philosophical Association Newsletter, 98, 86–7.Google Scholar

Chan, J. (1997). Hong Kong, Singapore, and ‘Asian Values’: An Alternative View, Journal of Democracy, 8 (2), 35–48.Google Scholar

Chan, S. K. (2000a). Cultural Issues and Crime, Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 12: 1–25.Google Scholar

Chan, S. K. (2000b). Rethinking the Criminal Justice System of the Singapore for the 21th Century, in Singapore Academy of Law, The Singapore Conference: Leading the Law and Lawyers into the New Millennium @2020, Singapore: Butterworths.Google Scholar

Chan, S. K. (1996). The Criminal Process – The Singapore Model, Singapore Law Review, 17: 433–503.Google Scholar

Cohen, L. J. (1977). The Probable and the Provable, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dolinko, D. (1986). Is There a Rationale for the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination?, UCLA Law Review, 33, 1063–148.Google Scholar

Donagan, A. (1984). The Right Not to Incriminate Oneself, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1 (2): 137–48.Google Scholar

Friendly, H. J. (1968). The Fifth Amendment Tomorrow: The Case for Constitutional Change, University of Cincinnati Law Review, 37 (4): 671–726.Google Scholar

Gerstein, R. S. (1979a). The Self-Incrimination Debate in Great Britain, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 27 (1), 81–114.Google Scholar

Gerstein, R. S. (1979b). The Demise of Boyd: Self-Incrimination and Private Papers in the Burger Court, UCLA Law Review, 27 (2), 343–97.Google Scholar

Gerstein, R. S. (1971). Punishment and Self-Incrimination, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 16, 84–94.Google Scholar

Gerstein, R. S. (1970). Privacy and Self-Incrimination, Ethics, 80 (2), 87–101.Google Scholar

Green, M. S. (1999). The Privilege’s Last Stand: The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination and the Right to Rebel Against the State, Brooklyn Law Review, 65 (3), 627–716.Google Scholar

Greenawalt, R. K. (1981). Silence as a Moral and Constitutional Right, William and Mary Law Review, 23 (1), 15–71.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J. (1970). Ideology in Criminal Procedure or a Third ‘Model’ of the Criminal Process, The Yale Law Journal, 79 (3), 359–417.Google Scholar

Ho, H. L. (2015). The Legal Concept of Evidence, Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, in https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evidence-legal/.Google Scholar

Ho, H. L. (2013). The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination and Right of Access to a Lawyer. A Comparative Assessment, Singapore Academy Law Journal, 25, 826–46.Google Scholar

Ho, H. L. (2012). ‘National Values on Law and Order’ and the Discretion to Exclude Wrongfully Obtained Evidence, Journal of Commonwealth Criminal Law, 2012, 232–56.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. (1640). Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, Tonnies, F., ed., 1889, London: Simpkin, Marshall.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan, Oakeshott, M. ed., New York: Touchstone, 1962.Google Scholar

Hohfeld, W. N. (1913). Some Fundamental Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, The Yale Law Journal, 23 (1), 16–59.Google Scholar

Hohfeld, W. N. (1917). Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, The Yale Law Journal, 26 (8), 710–70.Google Scholar

Jayasuriya, K. (1999). Corporatism and Judicial Independence Within Statist Legal Institutions in East Asia, in Jayasuriya, K. (ed.), Law, Capitalism and Power in Asia: The Rule of Law and Legal Institutions, London-New York: Routledge, 173–204.Google Scholar

Kane, P. V. (1977). History of Darmaśāstra (Ancient and Mediœval Religious and Civil Law in India), Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.Google Scholar

Lee, K. Y. (1990). Address by the Honourable the Prime Minister, Mr. Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 2, 155–60.Google Scholar

Leng, R. (2001). Silence Pre-trial, Reasonable Expectations and the Normative Distortion of Fact-Finding, International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 5 (4), 240–56.Google Scholar

Lewis, A. D. E. (1988). Bentham and the Right of Silence, The Bentham Newsletter, 12, 37–42.Google Scholar

Lewis, A. D. E. (1990). Bentham’s View of the Right of Silence, Current Legal Problems, 43 (1), 135–57.Google Scholar

Packer, H. (1964). Two Models of the Criminal Process, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 113 (1), 1–68.Google Scholar

Packer, H. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Palmer, M. (2017). Constitutional Dialogue and the Rule of Law, Hong Kong Law Journal, 47, 505–24.Google Scholar

Quirk, H. (2017). The Rise and Fall of the Right of Silence, Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ristroph, A. (2009). Respect and Resistance in Punishment Theory, California Law Review, 97 (2), 601–32.Google Scholar

Roberts, P. and Zuckerman, A. (2010). Criminal Evidence, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rosemont, H. Jr. (2015). Against Individualism. A Confucian Rethinking of the Foundations of Morality, Politics, Family and Religion, London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Rosemont, H. Jr. and Ames, R. T. (2016). Confucian Role Ethics. A Moral Vision for the 21st Century, Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.Google Scholar

Rosemont, H. Jr. and Ames, R. T. (2008). Family Reverence as the Source of Consummatory Conduct, Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 7 (1), 9–19.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. (2008a). On the Supposed Jury-Dependence of Evidence Law, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155 (1), 165–202.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. (2008b). In Defense of Rule-Based Evidence Law: And Epistemology Too, Episteme, 5 (3), 295–305.Google Scholar

Shanmugam, K. (2012). The Rule of Law in Singapore, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, Dec. 2012, 357–65.Google Scholar

Sim, M. (2015). Why Confucius’ Ethics Is a Virtue Ethics, in Besser-Jones, L. and Slote, M. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Virtue Ethics, New York-London: Routledge: 63–76.Google Scholar

Smith, M. (2018). When Does Evidence Suffice for Conviction?, Mind, 127 (508), 1193–218.Google Scholar

Tan, Y. L. (2005). Criminal Procedure, Vol. 2, Singapore: LexisNexis.Google Scholar

Thomas III, G. C. and Leo, R. A. (2012). Confessions of Guilt, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Waldron, J. (1981). A Right to Do Wrong, Ethics, 92 (1), 21–39.Google Scholar

Allen, R. J. (1986). A Reconceptualization of Civil Trials, Boston University Law Review, 66, 401–37.Google Scholar

Allen, R. J., (1991a). The Nature of Juridical Proof, Cardozo Law Review, 373, 413–20.Google Scholar

Allen, R. J. (1991b). On the Significance of Batting Averages and Strikeout Totals: A Clarification of the ‘Naked Statistical Evidence’ Debate, the Meaning of ‘Evidence,’ and the Requirement of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Tulane Law Review, 65, 1093–110.Google Scholar

Allen, R. J. (2016). The Nature of Juridical Proof: Probability as a Tool in Plausible Reasoning, The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 21(1–2), 133–42.Google Scholar

Bein, D. (1993). Preparatory Offences, Israel Law Review, 27(1–2), 185–212.Google Scholar

Blackstone, W. (1769). Commentaries on the Laws of England, London, 352Google Scholar

Brook, J. (1985). The Use of Statistical Evidence of Identification in Civil Litigation: Well-Worn Hypotheticals, Real Cases, and Controversy, St. Louis University Law Journal, 29, 293–352.Google Scholar

Capra, D. and Richter, L. (2018). Character Assassination: Amending Federal Rule of Evidence 404(B) to Protect Criminal Defendants, Columbia Law Review, 118(3), 769–832.Google Scholar

Cartwright, N. (1979). Causal Laws and Effective Strategies, Noûs, 13(4), 419–37.Google Scholar

Cheng, E. K. (2013). Reconceptualizing the Burden of Proof, Yale Law Journal, 122, 1254–79.Google Scholar

Clermont, K. M. (2012). Aggregation of Probabilities and Illogic, Georgia Law Review, 47, 165–80.Google Scholar

Cohen, L. J. (1977) The Probable and the Provable, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Eels, E. (1991). Probabilistic Causality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fennell, L. A. (2018). Accidents and Aggregates, William and Mary Law Review, 59, 2371–445.Google Scholar

Ferzan, K. K. (2011). Inchoate Crimes at the Prevention/Punishment Divide, San Diego Law Review, 48(4), 1273–98.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, M. O. and Fairley, W. B. (1970). A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence, Harvard Law Review, 83(3), 489–517.Google Scholar

Fisher, T. (2012). Conviction Without Conviction, Minnesota Law Review, 96, 833–85.Google Scholar

Goluboff, R. L. (2016). Vagrant Nation: Police Power, Constitutional Change, and the Making of the 1960s, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Good, I. J. (1961). A Causal Calculus I-II, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 11(44), 305–18.Google Scholar

Harel, A. and Porat, A. (2009). Aggregating Probabilities Across Cases: Criminal Responsibility for Unspecified Offenses, Minnesota Law Review, 94, 261–310.Google Scholar

Hessick, C. B. (2011). Disentangling Child Pornography from Child Sex Abuse, Washington University Law Review, 88(4), 853–902.Google Scholar

Hessick, C. B., ed. (2016). Refining Child Pornography Law Crime, Language, and Social Consequences, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Kaye, D. H. (1979a). Naked Statistical Evidence, Yale Law Journal, 89(3), 601–11.Google Scholar

Kaye, D. H. (1979b). The Paradox of the Gatecrasher and Other Stories, Arizona State Law Journal, 1979 (1), 101–10.Google Scholar

Laudan, L. (2006). Truth, Error, and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lempert, R. O. and Saltzburg, S. A., et al. (2014). A Modern Approach to Evidence, St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing.Google Scholar

Leubsdorf, J. (2016). The Surprising History of the Preponderance Standard of Civil Proof, Florida Law Review, 67(5), 1569–618.Google Scholar

Levmore, S. (2001). Conjunction and Aggregation, Michigan Law Review, 99(4), 723–56.Google Scholar

Mendlow, G. S. (2018). Why Is It Wrong to Punish Thoughts?, Yale Law Journal, 127(8), 2342–86.Google Scholar

Moss, S. (2018). Probabilistic Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nance, D. A. (2016). The Burdens of Proof – Discriminatory Power, Weight of Evidence, and Tenacity of Belief, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Newman, J. O. (2006). Quantifying the Standard of Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: A Comment on Three Comments, Law, Probability and Risk, 5(3–4), 267–9.Google Scholar

Papineau, D. (1985). Probabilities and Causes, Journal of Philosophy, 82(2), 57–74.Google Scholar

Porat, A. and Posner, E. A. (2012). Aggregation and Law, Yale Law Journal, 122(2), 1–69.Google Scholar

Redmayne, M. (1999). A Likely Story!, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 19(4), 659–72.Google Scholar

Rosen, D. (1978). In Defence of a Probabilistic Theory of Causality, Philosophy of Science, 45(4), 604–13.Google Scholar

Salmon, W. (1980). Probabilistic Causality, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 1980(2), 25–37.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. (2003). Profiles, Probabilities, and Stereotypes, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. (2011). Bentham on Presumed Offenses, Utilitas, 23(4), 363–79.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. (2015). On the Distinction Between Speech and Action, Emory Law Journal, 65(2), 427–54.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. and Zeckhauser, R. (1996). On the Degree of Confidence for Adverse Decisions, The Journal of Legal Studies, 25(1), 27–52.Google Scholar

Shaviro, D, (1989). Statistical-Probability Evidence and the Appearance of Justice, Harvard Law Review, 103(2), 530–54.Google Scholar

Suppes, P. (1970). A Probabilistic Theory of Causality, Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co.Google Scholar

Sutton, J. R. (2013). Symbol and Substance: Effects of California’s Three Strikes Law on Felony Sentencing, Law and Society Review, 47(1), 37–71.Google Scholar

Tapper, C. and Cross, R. (2010). Cross and Tapper on Evidence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thomson, J. J. (1986). Rights, Restitution, and Risk: Essays, in Moral Theory, Parente, W. ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tribe, L. H. (1971). Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process, Harvard Law Review, 84(6), 1329–93.Google Scholar

Volokh, A. (1997). N Guilty Men, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 146(1), 173–216.Google Scholar

Wansley, M. (2013). Scaled Punishments, New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 309–63.Google Scholar

Westen, P. and Ow, E. (2007). Reaching Agreement on When Jurors Must Agree, New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 153–209.Google Scholar

Williams, G. (1979). The Mathematics of Proof, Criminal Law Review, 1979(2), 340–54.Google Scholar

Wright, E. F., Maceachern, L., Stoffer, E. and Macdonald, N. (1996). Factors Affecting the Use of Naked Statistical Evidence of Liability, The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(6), 677–88.Google Scholar