Aims

The aim of this chapter is to consider the ethical dimensions of work in RDM.

An ethical service

Like any area of professional work, RDM has its ethical basis and its own ethical dilemmas and challenges.

Many who work in the area of RDM are driven by a strong belief in the benefits of data sharing (or even open data) and its ability to improve science through replicability or transparency and the possibility of new research. Others are motivated by a simpler (but also ethical) desire to do good by providing an excellent service to research communities or by contributing to learning. Others have more pragmatic, less ethically based motives.

Whatever the basis for our belief in the importance of RDM, we should always ask questions about the demands being made on researchers by institutions and governments, and our own role in potentially enforcing these. Open data sounds like an inherently good thing. But there is the potential for it to be used as a means to disadvantage particular types of research, such as qualitative research, where gaining consent for re-use may in some cases affect participation rates negatively. It also has the potential to be used by senior academics to appropriate the work of more junior colleagues. This reflects the fact that any agenda can and will be used politically within a nexus of power in an organisation. More generally there may be systematic connections between the agenda to share data and control over research. Such issues of power relate to local situations within departments; equally they exist in the imbalance between Western institutions and in developing countries. Open access, especially gold open access − where the publisher makes the final published version openly available on their web site − seems to actually disadvantage developing countries. We should always be asking critical questions about equity and justice within digital scholarship.