Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Outline of the book
- Part I Reconciling Natural and Mental Philosophy
- Part II Reconstructing Rational Mechanics
- Part III Mechanical Minds
- 8 Mental varieties
- 9 Mind and body
- 10 Attitudes, outlook, and memory
- 11 Reasoning
- 12 Rationality
- 13 Learning
- 14 Uncertainty
- Part IV The Metaphysics of Mechanics
- Part V Conclusion of the Matter
- System of Notation
- Bibliography
- Index
12 - Rationality
from Part III - Mechanical Minds
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Outline of the book
- Part I Reconciling Natural and Mental Philosophy
- Part II Reconstructing Rational Mechanics
- Part III Mechanical Minds
- 8 Mental varieties
- 9 Mind and body
- 10 Attitudes, outlook, and memory
- 11 Reasoning
- 12 Rationality
- 13 Learning
- 14 Uncertainty
- Part IV The Metaphysics of Mechanics
- Part V Conclusion of the Matter
- System of Notation
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The preceding treatment of reasoning indicates how we can interpret psychological rationality in terms of mechanical processes. Let us now look at the ways in which mechanical concepts enter into characterizing forms of economic rationality.
Limits on rationality
The difficulty and slowness with which real agents change their mental state constitutes one of the most evident limitations on rationality. As noted earlier, we can see reflections of the mechanical connection between momentum and force in “the more you need to change, the more you have to force yourself,” “the more you know, the harder it is to change your mind,” and other truisms of popular psychology. We can read the first of these truisms as stating a monotonicity relation between the size of changes and the size of the required forces and work done, and the second as stating a monotonicity relation between the mass and the force required for given changes. Notions of monotonicity and proportionality among the numerical magnitudes of momentum and force are familiar in traditional mechanics, but how do these apply in the discrete mechanical setting?
A mechanical interpretation of thinking also naturally relates slowness of change to inertia. From the same perspective, the unreality of ideal rationality appears because when we determine actions by finding the maxima of an expected utility function generated by instantaneous beliefs and desires, large changes can come from small impulses.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Extending Mechanics to MindsThe Mechanical Foundations of Psychology and Economics, pp. 295 - 325Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006