Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:37:12.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Domestic cycle and household formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2009

James Z. Lee
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Cameron D. Campbell
Affiliation:
University of California, Pasadena
Get access

Summary

Big brother, though born of the same mother and living in the same house [as his brothers], his position was entirely different from theirs. In the large Gao household, he was the eldest son of an eldest son, and for that reason his destiny was fixed from the moment he came into the world.

(Ba Jin, Family, 35)

In rural Liaoning, household structure, household position, and the rules of household formation combined to determine individual fate. Demographic decisions were decided by family strategy more than by personal preference. The family as a whole allocated labor and redistributed wealth; nurtured the young and cared for the aged. Family members who wanted to marry or bear children accordingly vied for a finite cache of rights and resources, distributed unequally by gender, by family relationship, and by seniority. The Liaoning peasant household was therefore not only a locus of affect and socialization, but also an arena of negotiation and conflict.

Household organization is a product of such negotiation. But just as these decisions can change household structure, so the arrangement of relationships within the household, in turn, influences individual opportunities and expectations to marry, to bear children, to retire, and to depart. Thus, each step along the household progression is the product of two reflexive forces: group strategy and individual will.

The domestic cycle reflects the common resolution of tensions within the domestic group. Rules of household formation show how people normatively resolved their competing claims. From them we can deduce the relationships between household members, and understand how authority was transmitted and transmuted within the household.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fate and Fortune in Rural China
Social Organization and Population Behavior in Liaoning 1774–1873
, pp. 105 - 132
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×