Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A.. 1964. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. National Bureau of Standards: 231.Google Scholar

Akindunni, F. F., and Gillham, R. W.. 1992. Unsaturated and saturated flow in response to pumping of an unconfined aquifer: Numerical investigation of delayed drainage. Ground Water, 30: 873–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barenblatt, G. I., Zheltov, I. P., and Kochina, I. N.. 1960. Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 24: 1286–1303.Google Scholar

Barrash, W., and Clemo, T.. 2002. Hierarchical geostatistics and multifacies systems: Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, Boise, Idaho. Water Resources Research, 38, no. 10: 1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bear, J. 1972. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. New York: Elsevier (reprinted by Dover Publications, 1988) 784 p.Google Scholar

Bear, J. 1979. Hydraulics of groundwater. McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y., 241 p.Google Scholar

Berg, S. J., and Illman, W. A.. 2011. Three-dimensional transient hydraulic tomography in a highly heterogeneous glaciofluvial aquifer-aquitard system. Water Resources Research, 47, W10507, doi:10.1029/2011WR010616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, S. J., and Illman, W. A.. 2013. Field study of subsurface heterogeneity with steady-state hydraulic tomography. Ground Water 51, no. 1: 29–40, doi:10.1111/j.1745–6584.2012.00914.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berg, S. J., and Illman, W. A.. 2014. Comparison of hydraulic tomography with traditional methods at a highly heterogeneous site. Ground Water, doi:10.1111/gwat.12159.CrossRef

Bevan, M. J., Endres, A. L., Rudolph, D. L., and Parkin, G.. 2005. A field scale study of pumping-induced drainage and recovery in an unconfined aquifer. Journal of Hydrology, 315: 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boggs, J. M., Young, S. C., Benton, D. J., and Chung, Y. C.. 1990. Hydrogeologic characterization of the MADE site. Interim Report EN-6915, Electric Power Res. Inst., Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar

Bohling, G. C., Butler, J. J. Jr., Zhan, X., and Knoll, M. D.. 2007. A field assessment of the value of steady-shape hydraulic tomography for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities. Water Resources Research, 43, W05430, doi:10.1029/2006WR004932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohling, G. C., Zhan, X., Butler, J. J. Jr., and Zheng, L.. 2002. Steady shape analysis of tomographic pumping tests for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities. Water Resources Research, 38, no. 12: 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boulton, N. S. 1954. Unsteady radial flow to a pumped well allowing for delayed yield from storage. International Association of Scientific Hydrology, 2: 472–477.Google Scholar

Boulton, N. S. 1963. Analysis of data from nonequilibrium pumping tests allowing for delayed yield from storage. Proceedings Institution of Civil Engineering, 26: 469–482.Google Scholar

Bouwer, H. 1978. Groundwater Hydrology. McGraw-Hill College, New York: 480 p.Google Scholar

Brouwer, J., and Anderson, H.. 2000. Water holding capacity of ironstone gravel in a typic plinthoxeralf in Southeast Australia. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64: 1603–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brauchler, R., Hu, R., Dietrich, P., and Sauter, M.. 2011. A field assessment of high-resolution aquifer characterization based on hydraulic travel time and hydraulic attenuation tomography. Water Resources Research, 47, W03503, doi:10.1029/2010WR009635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brauchler, R., Liedl, R., and Dietrich, P.. 2003. A travel time based hydraulic tomographic approach. Water Resources Research, 39, no. 12: 1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brutsaert, W. 1970. Immiscible multiphase flow in ground water hydrology: A computer analysis of the well flow problem, PhD Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.Google Scholar

Buckingham, E. 1907. Studies on the movement of soil moisture. Bulletin 38. USDA Bureau of Soils, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Cacas, M. C., Ledoux, E., de Marsily, G., Tillie, B., Barbreau, A., Durand, E., Feuga, B., and Peaudecerf, P.. 1990. Modeling fracture flow with a stochastic discrete fracture network: Calibration and validation. 1. The flow model. Water Resources Research, 26, no. 3: 479–489.Google Scholar

Capilla, J. E., Gmez-Hernández, J. J., and Sahuquillo, A.. 1997. Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric Data. 2. Demonstration on a synthetic aquifer: J. of Hydrology, v. 203, no. 1, 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardiff, M., and Barrash, W.. 2011. 3D transient hydraulic tomography in unconfined aquifers with fast drainage response. Water Resources Research, 47, W12518, doi:10.1029/2010WR010367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardiff, M., Barrash, W., and Kitanidis, P. K.. 2012. A field proof-of-concept of aquifer imaging using 3D transient hydraulic tomography with modular, temporarily-emplaced equipment. Water Resources Research, 48, W05531, doi:10.1029/2011WR011704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardiff, M., Barrash, W., Kitanidis, P. K., Malama, B., Revil, A., Straface, S., and Rizzo, E.. 2009. A potential-based inversion of unconfined steady-state hydraulic tomography. Ground Water, 47, no. 2: 259–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carman, P. C. 1937. Fluid flow through granular beds. Transaction of Institution of Chemical Engineering, 15: 150–166.Google Scholar

Carsel, R. F., and Parrish, R. S.. 1988. Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics. Water Resources Research, 24: 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castagna, M., and Bellin, A.. 2009. A Bayesian approach for inversion of hydraulic tomographic data. Water Resources Research, 45, W04410, doi:10.1029/2008WR007078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Z. X., Pang, Z. Y., Jiang, L. S., and Liu, M. X. 1986, Exact solution for the problem of crossflow in a bounded two-aquifer system with an aquitard, Water Resources Research, 22, no. 8: 1225–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clayton, V. D., and Andre, G. 1992. Gslb: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 340 p.Google Scholar

Coile, T. S. 1953. Moisture content of small stone in soil. Soil Science, 75: 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conca, J. L., Apted, M. J., Zhou, W., Arthur, R. C., and Kessler, J.. 1998. Flow barrier system for long-term high-level-waste isolation: Experimental results. Nuclear Technology, 124: 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, H. H. Jr., and Jacob, C. E.. 1946. A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history, Eos Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 27, 526–534, doi:10.1029/TR027i004p00526.Google Scholar

Corey, A. T. 1994. Mechanics of immiscible fluids in porous media, Water Resources Publications, 252 p.

Dagan, G. 1967. Method of determining permeability and effective porosity of unconfined anisotropic aquifers. Water Resources Research, 3, no. 4: 1059–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dagan, G. 1982. Stochastic modeling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities. 2. The solute transport. Water Resources Research, 18, 835–848.Google Scholar

De Marsily, G. 1986. Quantitative Hydrogeology: Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers., Academic Press, Orland, FL: 440 p.Google Scholar

Dershowitz, W. S., and Einstein, H. H.. 1988. Characterizing rock joint geometry with joint system models. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 21, no. 1: 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duguid, J. O., and Lee, P. C. Y.. 1977. Flow in fractured porous media. Water Resources Research, 13, no. 3: 558–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dverstorp, B., Andersson, J., and Nordqvist, W.. 1992. Discrete fracture network interpretation of field tracer migration in sparsely fractured rock. Water Resources Research, 28: 2327–2343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dykhuizen, R. C. 1990. A new coupling term for dual porosity models. Water Resources Research, 26, no. 2: 351–356.Google Scholar

Endres, A. L., Jones, J. P., and Bertrand, E. A.. 2007. Pumping-induced vadose zone drainage and storage in an unconfined aquifer: A comparison of analytical model predictions and field measurements. Journal of Hydrology, 335, no. 1–2: 207–218.Google Scholar

Flint, A. L., and Childs, S.. 1984. Physical properties of rock fragments and their effect on available water in skeletal soils, in Box, J. E. Jr. (ed.) Erosion and productivity of soils containing rock fragments, pp. 91–103. Soil Science Society of America Spec. Publ. 13. SSSA, Handbook No. 436. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Forchheimer, P. 1914–16. Teaching and the hydraulic manual, 5 volumes.

Freeze, R. A., and Cherry, J. A.. 1979. Groundwater, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 604 p.Google Scholar

Gardner, W. R. 1958. Some steady-state solutions of unsaturated moisture flow equations with application to evaporation from a water table. Soil Science 85: 228–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gee, G. W., and Ward, A. L.. 2001. Vadose Zone Transport Field Study: Status Report. PNNL-13679, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.Google Scholar

Gelhar, L. W. 1993. Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: 390 p.Google Scholar

Gelhar, L. W., and Axness, C. L.. 1983. Three-dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers, Water Resources Research, 19, no. 1: 161–180.Google Scholar

Gerke, H. H., and van Genuchten, M. T.. 1993a. A dual-porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media. Water Resources Research, 29, no. 2: 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerke, H. H., and van Genuchten, M. T.. 1993b. Evaluation of a first-order water transfer term for variably saturated dual-porosity models. Water Resources Research, 29, no. 4: 1225–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glass, R. J., Brainard, J. R., Yeh, T.-C. J.. 2005. Infiltration in unsaturated layered fluvial deposits at Rio Bravo: Macroscopic anisotropy and heterogeneous transport Vadose Zone. Journal, 4, no. 1: 22–31.Google Scholar

Gómez-Hernández, J. J., Sahuquillo, A., and, Capilla, J. E.. 1997. Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data, 1. Theory. J. of Hydrology, 203, no. 1–4: 162–174.Google Scholar

Graham, W. D., and McLaughlin, D. B.. 1989a. Stochastic Analysis of Non-Stationary Subsurface Solute Transport, 1. Unconditional Moments, Water Resources Research, 25, no. 2: 215–232.Google Scholar

Graham, W. D., and McLaughlin, D. B.. 1989b. Stochastic Analysis of Non-Stationary Subsurface Solute Transport. 2. Conditional Moments, Water Resources Research, 25, no. 11: 2331–2355.Google Scholar

Gutjahr, A. L. 1989. Fast Fourier transforms for random field generation, project report. Dept. of Math., N. M. Tech., Socorro.Google Scholar

Hadamard, J. 1902. Sur les problèmes aux dérivés partielles et leur signification physique. Princeton University Bulletin, 13: 49–52.Google Scholar

Hanna, S., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 1998. Estimation of co-conditional moments of transmissivity, hydraulic head, and velocity fields. Advances in Water Resources, 22: 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hantush, M. S. 1961a. Drawdown around a partially penetrating well. J. of the Hyd. Div. Proc. of the Am. Soc. of Civil Eng. 87, no. HY4: 83–98.Google Scholar

Hantush, M. S. 1961b. Aquifer tests on partially penetrating wells. Jour. of the Hyd. Div., Proc. of the Am. Soc. of Civil Eng. 87, no. HY5: 171–194.Google Scholar

Hantush, M. S. 1964. Hydraulics of wells, in Chow, Ven Te (ed.), Advances in Hydrosciences, vol. 1, Academic Press Inc., New York.Google Scholar

Hantush, M. S., and Jacob, C. E.. 1955. Non-steady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 36, no. 1: 95–100.Google Scholar

Hao, Y., Yeh, T.-C. J., Xiang, J., Illman, W. A., Ando, K., Hsu, K.-C. et al. 2008. Hydraulic tomography for detecting fracture zone connectivity. Ground Water, 46: 183–92, doi:10.1111/j.1745–6584.2007.00388.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harter, T., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 1996a. Stochastic analysis of solute transport in heterogeneous, variably saturated soils, Water Resources Research, 32, no. 6: 1585–1596.Google Scholar

Harter, T., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 1996b. Conditional stochastic analysis of solute transport in heterogeneous, variably saturated soils, Water Resources Research, 32, no. 6: 1597–1610.Google Scholar

He, Z., Datta-Gupta, A., and Vasco, D. W.. 2006. Rapid inverse modeling of pressure interference tests using trajectory based travel time and amplitude sensitivities. Water Resources Research, 42, W03419, doi:10.1029/2004WR003783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendricks Franssen, H. J., Brunner, P., Makobo, P., and Kinzelbach, W.. 2008. Equally likely inverse solutions to a groundwater flow problem including pattern information from remote sensing images, Water Resources Research, 44, W01419, doi:10.1029/2007WR006097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hess, K. M. 1989. Use of a borehole flowmeter to determine spatial heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity and macrodispersion in a sand and gravel aquifer, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, in Molz, F. J., Melville, J. G., and Gtiven, O. (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on New Field Techniques for Quantifying the Physical and Chemical Properties of Heterogeneous Aquifers, pp. 497–508. National Water Well Association, Dublin, Ohio.Google Scholar

Hoeksema, R. J., and Kitanidis, P. K.. 1984. An application of the geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in two-dimensional groundwater modeling. Water Resources Research, 20, no. 7: 1003–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, S. Y., Wen, J. C., Yeh, T.-C. J., Lu, W., Juan, H. L., Tseng, C. M., Lee, J. H., and Chang, K. C.. 2011. Robustness of joint interpretation of sequential pumping tests: Numerical and field experiments. Water Resources Research, 47, W10530, doi:10.1029/2011WR010698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughson, D., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 2000. An inverse model for three-dimensional flow in variably saturated porous media. Water Resources Research, 36: 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Illman, W. A., Berg, S. J., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 2011. Comparison of approaches for predicting solute transport: Sandbox experiments. Ground Water, 50: 421–431, doi:10.1111/j.1745–6584.2011.00859.x.Google ScholarPubMed

Illman, W. A., Craig, A. J., and Liu, X.. 2008. Practical issues in imaging hydraulic conductivity through hydraulic tomography. Ground Water, 46, no. 1: 120–132, doi:10.1111/j.1745–6584.2007.00374.x.Google ScholarPubMed

Illman, W. A., Liu, X., and Craig, A.. 2007. Steady-state hydraulic tomography in a laboratory aquifer with deterministic heterogeneity: Multimethod and multiscale validation of K tomograms. J. Hydrol., 341, no. 3–4: 222–234, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Illman, W. A., Liu, X., Takeuchi, S., Yeh, T.-C. J., Ando, K., and Saegusa, H.. 2009. Hydraulic tomography in fractured granite: Mizunami Underground Research Site, Japan. Water Resources Research, 45, W01406, doi:10.1029/2007WR006715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Illman, W. A., Zhu, J., Craig, A. J., and Yin, D.. 2010. Comparison of aquifer characterization approaches through steady state groundwater model validation: A controlled laboratory sandbox study. Water Resources Research, 46, W04502, doi:10.1029/2009WR007745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isaaks, E. H., and Srivastava, R. M.. 1989. Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York: 561 p.Google Scholar

Jacob, C. E. 1963a. Determining the permeability of water table aquifers. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply, 1536-I: 245–271.Google Scholar

Khaleel, R., and Freeman, E. J.. 1995. Variability and scaling of hydraulic properties for 200 area soils, Hanford Site. WHC-EP-0883, Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA.

Khaleel, R., and Heller, P. R.. 2003. On the hydraulic properties of coarse-textured sediments at intermediate water contents. Water Resources Research, 39, no. 9, doi:10.1029/2003WR002387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khaleel, R., and Relyea, J. F.. 1997. Correcting laboratory-measured moisture retention data for gravels. Water Resources Research, 33: 1875–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khaleel, R., and Relyea, J. F.. 2001. Variability of Gardner's α for coarse-textured sediments. Water Resources Research, 37: 1567–1575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khaleel, R., Relyea, J. F., and Conca, J. L.. 1995. Evaluation of Van Genuchten–Mualem relationships to estimate unsaturated hydraulic conductivity at low water contents. Water Resources Research, 31, no. 11: 2659–2668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khaleel, R., Yeh, T.-C. J., and Lu, Z.. 2002. Upscaled flow and transport properties for heterogeneous unsaturated media. Water Resources Research, 38, no. 5: 10.1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitanidis, P. K. 1995. Quasi-Linear geostatistical theory for Inversing. Water Resources Research, 31, no. 10: 2411–2419, doi:10.1029/95WR01945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klute, A., 1965. Laboratory measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated soil. in Black, C. A. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI: 210–221.Google Scholar

Kuhlman, K. L., Hinnell, A. C., Mishra, P. K., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 2008. Basin-scale transmissivity and storativity estimation using hydraulic tomography. Ground Water, 46, no. 5: 706–715, doi:10.1111/j.1745–6584.2008.00455.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lakshminarayana, V., and Rajagopalan, S. P.. 1978. Type-curve analysis of time-drawdown data for partially penetrating wells in unconfined anisotropic aquifers. Ground Water, 16: 328–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Last, G. V., and Caldwell, T. G.. 2001. Core Sampling in Support of the Vadose Zone Transport Field Study. PNNL-13454, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.Google Scholar

Last, G. V., Caldwell, T. G., and Owen, A. T.. 2001. Sampling of Borehole WL-3A through -12 in Support of the Vadose Zone Transport Field Study. PNNL-13631, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.Google Scholar

Lenhard, R. J., and, Parker, J. C.. 1987. Model for hysteretic constitutive relations governing multiphase flow. 2. Permeability-saturation relations. Water Resources Research, 23: 2197–2206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, B., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 1999. Cokriging estimation of the conductivity field under variably saturated flow conditions, Water Resources Research, 35, no. 12: 3663–3674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, W., Englert, A., Cirpka, O. A., and Vereecken, H.. 2008. Three-dimensional geostatistical inversion of flowmeter and pumping test data. Ground Water, 46, no. 2: 193–201, doi:10.1111/j.1745–6584.2007.00419.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liu, S. Y., Yeh, T.-C. J., and Gardiner, R.. 2002. Effectiveness of hydraulic tomography: Sandbox experiments. Water Resources Research, 38, no. 4: Article Number: 1034, doi:10.1029/2001WR000338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, X., Illman, W. A., Craig, A. J., Zhu, J., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 2007. Laboratory sandbox validation of transient hydraulic tomography. Water Resources Research, 43, W05404, doi:10.1029/2006WR005144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, J. C. S., Remer, J. S., Wilson, C. R., and Witherspoon, P. A.. 1982. Porous media equivalents for networks of discontinuous fractures. Water Resources Research, 18, no. 3: 645–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mao, D., Wan, L., Yeh, T.-C. J., Lee, C. H., Hsu, K. C., Wen, J. C., and Lu, W.. 2011. A revisit of drawdown behavior during pumping in unconfined aquifers. Water Resources Research, 47, W05502, doi:10.1029/2010WR009326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mao, D., Yeh, T.-C. J., and Wan, L.. 2013a. Necessary conditions for inverse modeling of flow through variably saturated porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 52: 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mao, D., Yeh, T.-C. J., Wan, L., Lee, C.-H., Hsu, K.-C., Wen, J.-C., and Lu, W.. 2013b. Cross-correlation analysis and information content of observed heads during pumping in unconfined aquifers, Water Resources Research, 49, no. 2: 713–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mao, D., Yeh, T.-C. J., Wan, L., Wen, J.-C., Lu, W., Lee, C.-H., and Hsu, K.-C.. 2013c. Joint interpretation of sequential pumping tests in unconfined aquifers. Water Resources Research, 49, no. 4: 1782–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehuys, G. R., Stolzy, L. H., Letey, J., and Weeks, L. V.. 1975. Effect of stones on the hydraulic conductivity of relatively dry desert soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 39: 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mishra, P. K., and Neuman, S. P.. 2010. Improved forward and inverse analyses of saturated-unsaturated flow toward a well in a compressible unconfined aquifer. Water Resources Research, 46, W07508, doi:10.1029/2009WR008899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moench, A. F. 2008. Analytical model and numerical analyses of unconfined aquifer test considering unsaturated zone characteristics. Water Resources Research, 44, W06409, doi:10.1029/2006WR005736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montagne, C., Ruddell, J., and Ferguson, H.. 1992. Water retention of soft siltstone fragments in a Ustic Torriorthent. Central Montana. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56: 555–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mualem, Y. 1976. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research, 12: 513–522.Google Scholar

Narasimhan, T. N., and Zhu, M.. 1993. Transient flow of water to a well in an unconfined aquifer: Applicability of some conceptual models. Water Resources Research, 29: 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Research Council (NRC). 1996. Rock Fractures and Fluid Flow: Contemporary Understanding and Applications. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.

Neuman, S. P. 1972. Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response of the water table. Water Resources Research, 8, no. 4: 1031–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuman, S. P. 1973. Supplementary comments on “Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response of the water table.” Water Resources Research, 9, no. 4: 1102–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuman, S. P. 1975. Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research, 11, no. 2: 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuman, S. P. 1979. Perspective on “delayed yield.” Water Resources Research, 15, no. 4: 899–908.Google Scholar

Neuman, S. P. 1987. Stochastic continuum representation of fractured rock permeability as an alternative to the REV andfracture network concepts, in Farmer, I. W., Daemen, J. J. K., Desai, C. S., Glass, C.E., and Neuman, S. P. (eds.), Rock Mechanics. Proceedings of the 28th US Symposium, Tucson, Arizona. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, 1240 pp.Google Scholar

Neuman, S. P., and Witherspoon, P. A.. 1969. Theory of flow in a confined two-aquifer system. Water Resources Research, 5, no. 4: 803–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ni, C.-F., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 2008. Stochastic inversion of pneumatic cross-hole tests and barometric pressure fluctuations in heterogeneous unsaturated formations. Advances in Water Resources, 31, no. 12: 1708–1718, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ni, C.-F., Yeh, T.-C. J., and Chen, J.-S.. 2009. Cost-effective hydraulic tomography surveys for predicting flow and transport in heterogeneous aquifers. Environ. Sci. Technol., 43 no. 10: 3720–3727, doi:10.1021/es8024098CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nielsen, D. R., Biggar, J. W., and Erh, K. T.. 1973. Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties. Hilgardia, 42: 214–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nwankwor, G. I., Cherry, J. A., and Gillham, R. W.. 1984. A comparative study of specific yield determinations for a shallow sand aquifer. Ground Water, 22: 764–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nwankwor, G. I., Gillham, R. W., van der Kamp, G., and Akindunni, F. F.. 1992. Effect of the capillary fringe during pumping of unconfined aquifers: Field evidence of delayed drainage. Ground Water, 30, no. 5: 690–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, J. C., and Lenhard, R. J.. 1987. Model for hysteretic constitutive relations governing multiphase flow. 1. Saturation-pressure relations. Water Resources Research, 23: 2187–2196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polubarinova-Kochina, P. Ya., 1952. Theory of Motion of Ground Water. Moscow: Gosudarstv. Izdat. Tehn.-Teor. Lit., translated as Polubarinova-Kochina, P. Ya., 1962. Theory of Ground Water Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T.. 1992. Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing. Edition 2. Cambridge University Press, 933 p.Google Scholar

Priestley, M. B. 1981. Spectral analysis and time series: Probability and mathematical statistics, a series of monographs and textbooks. Academic Press, London/San.Google Scholar

Pruess, K., and Narasimhan, T. N.. 1985. A practical method for modeling fluid and heat flow in fractured porous media. Society of Petroleum Engineering Journal, 25, no. 1: 14 – 26.Google Scholar

Pyrcz, M. J., and Deutsch, C. V.. 2003. The whole story on the hole effect. Geostatistical Association of Australasia, Newsletter.

Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Saxton, K. E.. 1982. Estimating soil water properties. Transactions American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 25, no. 5: 1316–1320, 1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rehfeld, K. R., Hufschmeid, P.., Gelhar, L. W., and Schaefer, M. E.. 1989. Measuring Hydraulic Conductivity with the Borehole Flowmeter, Top. Rep. EN-651I, Elec. Power Res. Inst., Palo Alto, Calif.

Robin, M. J. L., Sudicky, E. A., Gillham, R. W., and Kachanoski, R. G.. 1991. Spatial variability of strontium distribution coefficients and their correlation with hydraulic conductivity in the Canadian Forces Base Borden Aquifer. Water Resources Research, 27, no. 10: 2619–2632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, C. W., Stern, W. R., and Drummond, J. E.. 1965. Determination of hydraulic conductivity as a function of depth and water content for soil in situ. Australian Journal of Soil Reseach, 3: 1–9.Google Scholar

Ross, B. 1990. The diversion capacity of capillary barriers. Water Resources Research, 26: 2625–2629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russo, D. 1997. On the estimation of parameters of log-unsaturated conductivity covariance from solute transport data. Advances in Water Resources, 20, no. 4: 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russo, D., and Bouton, M.. 1992. Statistical analysis of spatial variability in unsaturated flow parameters. Water Resources Research, 28, no. 7: 1911–1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russo, D, Russo, I., and Laufer, A.. 1997. On the spatial variability of parameters of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Water Resources Research, 33, no. 5: 947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheibe, T. D., Murphy, E. M., Xingyuan, C., Rice, A., Carroll, K. C., Palmer, B. J., Tartakovsky, A. M., Battiato, I., and Wood, B. D.. 2015. An Analysis Platform for Multiscale Hydrogeologic Modeling with Emphasis on Hybrid Multiscale Methods. Ground Water, 53(1): 38–56. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Selker, J. 1997. Design of interface shape for protective capillary barriers. Water Resources Research, 33: 259–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharmeen, R., Illman, W. A., Berg, S. J., Yeh, T.-C. J., Park, Y.-J., Sudicky, E. A.. 2012. Transient hydraulic tomography in a fractured dolostone: Laboratory rock block experiments. Water Resources Research 48. W10532, doi:10.1029/2012wr012216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sisson, J. B., and Lu, A. H.. 1984. Field Calibration of Computer Models for Application to Buried Liquid Discharges: A Status Report, RHO-ST-46P. Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA.

Smith, L., and Freeze, R. A.. 1979a. Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain. 1. One-dimensional simulations, Water Resources Research, 15, no. 3: 521–528.Google Scholar

Smith, L., and Freeze, R. A.. 1979b. Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain. 2. Two-dimensional simulations. Water Resources Research, 15, no. 6: 1543–1559.Google Scholar

Soil Conservation Service. 1975. Soil Taxonomy. United States Department of Agriculture Agriculture and Natural Resources Conservation Service, Handbook Number 436.

Stephens, D. B., Lambert, K., and Watson, D.. 1987. Regression models for hydraulic conductivity and field test of the borehole permeameter. Water Resources Research, 23, no. 12: 2207–2214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Straface, S., Yeh, T.-C. J., Zhu, J., Troisi, S., and Lee, C. H.. 2007. Sequential aquifer tests at a well field, Montalto Uffugo Scalo, Italy. Water Resources Research, 43, W07432, doi:10.1029/2006WR005287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streltsova, T. D. 1972a. Unconfined aquifer and slow drainage. Journal of Hydrology, 16: 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streltsova, T. D. 1972b. Unsteady radial flow in an unconfined aquifer. Water Resources Research, 8, no. 4: 1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sudicky, E. A. 1986. A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process. Water Resources Research, 22, no. 13: 2069–2082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sun, R., Yeh, T.-C. J., Mao, D., Jin, M., Lu, W., and Hao, Y.. 2013. A temporal sampling strategy for hydraulic tomography analysis. Water Resources Research, 49, doi:10.1002/wrcr.20337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tartakovsky, G. D., and Neuman, S. P.. 2007. Three-dimensional saturated-unsaturated flow with axial symmetry to a partially penetrating well in a compressible unconfined aquifer. Water Resources Research, 43, W01410, doi:10.1029/2006WR005153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Theis, C. V. 1935. The relation between lowering the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground water storage. EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 16: 519–524.Google Scholar

Tsang, Y. W., Tsang, C. F., Hale, F. V., and Dverstorp, B.. 1996. Tracer transport in a stochastic continuum model of fractured media. Water Resources Research, 32, no. 10: 3077–3092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tokunaga, T. K., Wan, J., and Olson, K. R.. 2002. Saturation-matric potential relations in gravel. Water Resources Research, 10: 1029–2001.Google Scholar

Tuller, M., and Or, D.. 2005. Retention of water in soil and the soil water characteristic curve, in Hillel, D. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment. Elsevier, 2005.Google Scholar

Ünlü, K., Nielson, D. R., and Biggar, J. W.. 1990. Statistical parameters characterizing the spatial variability of selected soil hydraulic properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 54: 1537–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Genuchten, M. Th. 1980. A closed-form solution for predicting the conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44: 892–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Genuchten, M. Th., and Nielsen, D. R.. 1985. On describing and predicting the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils. Annales Geophysicae, 3: 615–628.Google Scholar

Vasco, D. W., and Karasaki, K.. 2006. Interpretation and inversion of low frequency head observations, Water Resources Research, 42, W05408, doi:10.1029/2005WR004445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasco, D. W., Keers, H., and Karasaki, K.. 2000. Estimation of reservoir properties using transient pressure data: An asymptotic approach, Water Resources Research, 36, 3447–3465, doi:10.1029/2000WR900179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, A. L, Caldwell, T. G., and Gee, G. W.. 2000. Vadose Zone Transport Field Study: Soil Water Content Distributions by Neutron Moderation. PNNL-13795, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warrick, A. W. 2003. Soil Water Dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Watson, K. K. 1966. An instantaneous profile method for determining the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous materials. Water Resources Research, 2, no. 4: 709–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wen, J. C., Wu, C. M., Yeh, T.-C. J., and Tseng, C. M.. 2010. Estimation of effective aquifer hydraulic properties from an aquifer test with multi-well observations (Taiwan). Hydrogeology Journal, 18: 1143–1155, doi:10.1007/s10040-010-0577–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, I., and Sully, M. J.. 1992. On the variability and use of the hydraulic conductivity alpha parameter in stochastic treatments of unsaturated flow. Water Resources Research, 28, no. 1: 209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodbury, A. D., and Sudicky, E. A.. 1991. The geostatistical characteristics of the borden aquifer. Water Resources Research, 27, no. 4: 533–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, C. M., Yeh, T.-C. J., Zhu, J., Lee, T. H., Hsu, N. S., Chen, C. H., and Sancho, A. F.. 2005. Traditional analysis of aquifer tests: Comparing apples to oranges. Water Resources Research, 41, W09402, doi:10.1029/2004WR003717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xiang, J., Yeh, T.-C. J., Lee, C.-H., Hsu, K.-C., and Wen, J.-C.. 2009. A simultaneous successive linear estimator and a guide for hydraulic tomography analysis, Water Resources Research, 45, W02432, doi:10.1029/2008WR007180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yates, S. R., van Genuchten, M. Th., Warrick, A. R., and Lei, F. J.. 1992. Analysis of measured, predicted, and estimated hydraulic conductivities using the RETC computer program. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56: 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ye, M., Khaleel, R., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 2005. Stochastic analysis of moisture plume dynamics of a field injection experiment, Water Resources Research, 41: 3, W03013, doi:10.1029/2004WR003735CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J. 1989. One-dimensional steady-state infiltration in heterogeneous soils. Water Resources Research, 25, no. 10: 2149–2158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J. 1992. Stochastic modeling of groundwater flow and solute transport in aquifers. Hydrological Processes, 6: 369–395.Google Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J. 1998. Scale issues of heterogeneity in vadose-zone hydrology, in Sposito, G. (ed.), Scale Dependence and Scale Invariance in Hydrology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., and Gelhar, L. W.. 1983. Unsaturated flow in heterogeneous soils, in J. W. Mercer et al. (eds.) Role of the Unsaturated Zones in Radioactive and Hazardous Waste Disposal. Ann Arbor Science: 71–79.

Yeh, T.-C. J., and Harvey, D. J..1990. Effective unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of layered sands. Water Resources Research, 26, no. 6: 1271–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., and Lee, C. H.. 2007. Time to change the way we collect and analyze data for aquifer characterization. Ground Water 45, no. 2: 116–118.Google ScholarPubMed

Yeh, T.-C. J., and Liu, S.. 2000. Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method. Water Resources Research, 36, no. 8: 2095–2105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., and Zhang, J.. 1996. A geostatistical inverse method for variably saturated flow in the vadose zone, Water Resources Research, 32, no. 9: 2757–2766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., Gagnard, P. E., Guzman, A., and Srivastava, R.. 1993. Numerical simulation of the wicking effect in linear systems. Ground Water, 32, no. 1: 2–11.Google Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., Gelhar, L. W., and Gutjahr, A. L.. 1985a. Stochastic analysis of unsaturated flow in heterogeneous soils. 1. Statistically isotropic media. Water Resources Research, 21, no. 4: 447–456.Google Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., Gelhar, L. W., and Gutjahr, A. L.. 1985b. Stochastic analysis of unsaturated flow in heterogeneous soils. 2. Statistically anisotropic media, Water Resources Research, 21, no. 4: 457–464.Google Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., Gelhar, L. W., and Gutjahr, A. L.. 1985c. Stochastic analysis of unsaturated flow in heterogeneous soils. 3. Observations and applications. Water Resources Research, 21, no. 4: 465–471.Google Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., Gutjahr, A. L., and Jin, M.. 1995. An iterative cokriging-like technique for groundwater flow modeling, Ground Water, 33: 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., Guzman, A., Srivastava, R., Gagnard, P. E., and Kramer, J.. 1995. Simulation of the wicking effect in a two-layer soil liner system. Waste Management & Research 13: 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., Liu, S., Glass, R., Baker, K., Brainard, J., Alumbaugh, D., and LaBrecque, D.. 2002. A geostatistically based inverse model for electrical resistivity surveys and its applications to vadose zone hydrology, Water Resources Research, 3: 12, Article Number: 1278, doi:10.1029/2001WR001204Google Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., Lee, C.-K., Hsu, K.-C., Tan, Y.-C.. 2007. Fusion Of Active and Passive Hydrological and Geophysical Surveys: The Future of Subsurface Characterization, “Data Integration in Subsurface Hydrology,” D. W. Hyndman, F. D. Day-Lewis, and K. Singha (eds.), AGU Monograph.

Yeh, T.-C. J. et al. 2008. A view toward the future of subsurface characterization: CAT scanning groundwater basins, Water Resources Research, 44, W03301, doi:10.1029/2007WR006375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., Mao, D., Wan, L., Lee, C.-H., Wen, J.-C., Hsu, K.-C.. 2011. Well Definedness, Scale Consistency, and Resolution Issues in Groundwater Model Parameter Identification. University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., Mao, D., Zha, Y., Hsu, K.-C., Lee, C.-H., Wen, J.-C., Lu, W., and Yang, J. 2014. Why hydraulic tomography works? Ground Water 52: 168–172, doi:10.1111/gwat.12129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yeh, T.-C. J., Ye, M., and Khaleel, R.. 2005. Estimation of effective unsaturated hydraulic conductivity tensor using spatial moment of observed moisture plumes. Water Resources Research, 41, W03014, doi:10, 1029/2004WR003736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yeh, T.-C. J., Zhu, J., Englert, A., Guzman, A., and Flaherty, S.. 2006. A Successive Linear Estimator for Electrical Resistivity Tomography, Applied Hydrogeophysics, H. Vereecken, A. Binely, G. Cassiani, A. Revil, and K. Titov (eds.). NATO Science Series, Springer, 383 p.

Zhang, J., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 1997. An iterative geostatistical inverse method for steady flow in the vadose zone, Water Resources Research, 33, no. 1: 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhu, J., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 2005. Characterization of aquifer heterogeneity using transient hydraulic tomography. Water Resources Research, 41, W07028, doi:10.1029/2004WR003790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhu, J., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 2006. Analysis of hydraulic tomography using temporal moments of drawdown recovery data, Water Resources Research, 42, W02403, doi:10.1029/2005WR004309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhu, J., and Yeh, T.-C. J.. 2008. Hydraulic tomography to characterization of heterogeneity of unconfined aquifers, paper presented at AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, Calif.

Zhu, J., Yeh, T.-C. J., and Mao, D.. 2011. Hydraulic tomography to characterize heterogeneity of unconfined aquifers, J. Nanjing Univ., 47, no. 3: 252–264.Google Scholar