Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents – summary
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- Table of treaties
- Table of legislation
- List of abbreviations
- Part I Sources
- Part II The foreign relations power
- Part III Foreign relations and the individual
- Part IV The foreign state
- 10 Personality and representation
- 11 The claimant state
- 12 The defendant state
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
11 - The claimant state
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2014
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents – summary
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- Table of treaties
- Table of legislation
- List of abbreviations
- Part I Sources
- Part II The foreign relations power
- Part III Foreign relations and the individual
- Part IV The foreign state
- 10 Personality and representation
- 11 The claimant state
- 12 The defendant state
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
The function of rules on the enforcement of foreign state claims
What kind of legal claims may a foreign state permissibly assert within Anglo-Commonwealth municipal legal systems? This is the essential question considered in Chapter 11. The answer to this question is of considerable practical importance, since it determines the extent to which a foreign state may resort to the courts of the forum in the enforcement of its rights against others. It is also significant for the light that it may shed on the larger question of the nature and limits on the external exercise of public power by states – a major theme of this work as a whole.
The analysis starts from the basic uncontested proposition that a foreign state is not shut out, merely by the fact that it is a state, from seeking relief in the courts of Anglo-Commonwealth countries. On the contrary, as was seen in Chapter 10, one reason for the development of specific rules of municipal law in order to determine statehood has been precisely because foreign states have been, and are permitted to be, frequent plaintiffs in Anglo-Commonwealth courts. When in 1828 counsel for an agent for the King of Spain resisted the King’s claim for an account on the alleged ground that a foreign sovereign cannot sue in the English courts, the Lord Chancellor remonstrated: ‘Has not the sovereign power of another country the common privilege of mankind?’ Lord Redesdale held:
This is one of the clearest cases that can possibly be stated. I conceive that there can be no doubt that a sovereign may sue. If he cannot, there is a right, without a remedy; for it is only by suit in Court that the Respondent can obtain this money: he sues as every sovereign must sue, generally speaking, either on his own behalf, or on behalf of his subjects. If the courts of justice were to refuse to receive his suit, I apprehend that it might be a just cause of war. All transactions on behalf of nations, must be transactions with the sovereign power of those nations . . .
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Foreign Relations Law , pp. 419 - 476Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014