Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Macula servitutis
- 3 Freedmen and their patrons
- 4 The power and status of freedmen
- 5 The practice of manumission at Rome
- 6 The freedman in the Roman economy
- 7 The freedman (and his son) in public life
- 8 Being a Roman freedman
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Macula servitutis
- 3 Freedmen and their patrons
- 4 The power and status of freedmen
- 5 The practice of manumission at Rome
- 6 The freedman in the Roman economy
- 7 The freedman (and his son) in public life
- 8 Being a Roman freedman
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Freedman in the Roman World , pp. 300 - 334Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
Abbreviations of journal titles follow the Oxford Classical Dictionary (3rd edn).
(1992), ‘Liberti als Dekurionen. Einige Überlegungen zur lex Malacitana’, Laverna 3: 94–103.Google Scholar
(1993a), ‘Die innere Organisation der Augustalität. Jahresamt und Gesamtorganisation’, Athenaeum 81: 13–37.Google Scholar
(1993b), Die munizipale Mittelschicht im kaiserzeitlichen Italien. Zu einem neuen Verständnis von Sevirat und Augustalität (Frankfurt a. M.).Google Scholar
(1981), Pratique rhétorique et idéologie politique dans les discours ‘optimates’ de Cicéron (Leiden).Google Scholar
(1913), Die Persönlichkeit des Herrenlosen Sklaven. Ein Stück aus dem römischen Sklavenrecht (Leipzig).Google Scholar
(1987), ‘La vicesima libertatis in età imperiale’, Quaderni Catanesi di Studi Classici e Medievali 9: 41–76.Google Scholar
(1986a), ‘Die Freilassung von Sklaven und die Struktur der Sklaverei in der römischen Kaiserzeit’, in Die römische Gesellschaft. Ausgewählte Beiträge (Stuttgart) 286–331. First published in RSA 2 (1972) 97–129.Google Scholar
(1986b), ‘Die römische Gesellschaft: eine Nachbetrachtung über Struktur und Eigenart’, in Die römische Gesellschaft. Ausgewählte Beiträge (Stuttgart) 69–81.
(2001), ‘Placing individuals: Pompeian epigraphy in context’, Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 14: 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977), ‘Fondations privées et rapports sociaux en Italie romaine (Ier – IIIe s. ap. J.-C.)’, Ktema 2: 157–209.Google Scholar
(1987), La vie financière dans le monde romain. Les métiers de manieurs d'argent (IVe siècle av. J.-C. – IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.) (Rome).Google Scholar
(1992), ‘Mobilité sociale et activités commerciales et financières’, in La mobilité sociale dans le monde romain ed. (Strasbourg) 21–32.Google Scholar
(2004) ‘Les esclaves “hommes d'affaires” et la gestion des ateliers et commerces’, in Mentalités et choix économique des Romains eds. , , and (Paris) 111–26.Google Scholar
(2009), ‘Freedmen in the Satyrica’, in Petronius. A Handbook ed. and (Oxford) 114–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Der Ausdruck favor libertatis und das klassische römische Freilassungsrecht’, in Unfreie Arbeits- und Lebensverhältnisse von der Antike bis in die Gegenwart ed. (Hildesheim) 82–100.Google Scholar
(1999), ‘Il libro di Masi Doria sulla successione nei beni dei liberti: nota di lettura’, SDHI 65: 283–308.Google Scholar
(1966), ‘The purpose of the manumission laws of Augustus’, The Irish Jurist 1: 356–74.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘Workshop managers’, in The Inscribed Economy. Production and Distribution in the Roman Empire in the Light of instrumentum domesticum ed. (JRA Suppl. 6: Ann Arbor) 171–81.Google Scholar
(1994), Business Managers in Ancient Rome. A Social and Economic Study of Institores, 200 B.C. – A.D. 250 (Leiden, New York, and Cologne).Google Scholar
(2002), ‘A double standard in Roman criminal law? The death penalty and social structure in late republican and early imperial Rome’, in Speculum Iuris. Roman Law as a Reflection of Social and Economic Life in Antiquity ed. and (Ann Arbor) 94–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘De l'usage de l’écriture dans la gestion d'entreprise à l'époque romaine', in Mentalités et choix économique des Romains ed. , , and (Paris) 127–47.Google Scholar
(1979), ‘I prezzi degli schiavi e le pagne degli attori nell'orazione di Cicerone pro Q. Roscio comoedo’, in Actes du colloque sur l'esclavage Nieborów 2–6 XII 1975, ed. I. Biezunska-Malowist and J. Kolendo (Paris) 217–25.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘I ceti medi nell'epigrafia repubblicana della Gallia Cisalpina’, in I ceti medi in Cisalpina. Atti del Colloquio internazionale 14–16 settembre 2000 Milano ed. and (Milan) 13–26.Google Scholar
(2008), The Roman Bazaar. A Comparative Study of Trade and Markets in a Tributary Empire (Cambridge).Google Scholar
(1994), Forum der Angst. Eine historisch-anthropologische Studie zu Verhaltensmustern von Senatoren im römischen Kaiserreich (Frankfurt a. M.).Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Actors and act-divisions in Poenulus and its Greek original’, in Studien zu Plautus' Poenulus ed. (Tübingen) 93–111.Google Scholar
(1980), ‘Prinzipat und Sklavenrecht. Zu den geistigen Grundlagen der augusteischen Verfassungsschöpfung’, in Rechtswissenschaft und Rechtsentwicklung ed. (Göttingen) 53–88.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Der Brief. Korrespondenz, menchlich und rechtlich gesehen’, ZSSR 115: 115–49.Google Scholar
(1999), ‘Organisation municipale et hiérarchies sociales dans les provinces gauloises et alpines d'après la documentation épigraphique’, in XI Congresso internazionale di epigrafia Greca e Latina 2.39–54.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Mourning the puer delicatus: status inconsistency and the ethical value of fostering in Statius, Silvae 2.1’, AJPh 126: 257–80.Google Scholar
(1966), ‘Les affranchis dans les papyrus de l’époque ptolémaique et romaine', in Atti dell'XI Congresso internazionale di papirologia Milano 2–8 Settembre 1965 (Milan) 433–43.Google Scholar
(1977), L'esclavage dans l'Égypte gréco-romaine. Seconde partie: période romain (Wroclaw).Google Scholar
(2000), ‘Struttura della classe dirigente a Pompei e mobilità sociale. I rapporti con il centro’, in Les élites municipales de l'Italie péninsulaire de la mort de César à la mort de Domitien entre continuité et rupture. Classes sociales dirigeantes et pouvoir central ed. (Rome) 33–69.Google Scholar
(1988), ‘Defining slavery – its special features and social role’, in Slavery and Other Forms of Unfree Labour ed. (London and New York) 262–79.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Zum Thema der Sklaverei in Ciceros Briefen’, in Fünfzig Jahre Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei an der mainzer Akademie 1950–2000. Miscellanea zum Jubiläum ed. and (Stuttgart) 447–56.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘The technology of child production: eugenics and eulogics in the De liberis educandis’, Arethusa 39: 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999a), ‘Death on display: looking at Roman funerals’, in The Art of Ancient Spectacle ed. and (New Haven) 259–81.Google Scholar
(1999b), ‘The cena Trimalchionis’, in Latin Fiction. The Latin Novel in Context ed. (London and New York) 38–51.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘Das Gesicht der Aufsteiger: römische Freigelassene und die Ideologie der Elite’, in Moribus antiquis res stat Romana. Römische Werte und römische Literatur im 3. und 2. Jhr. v. Chr. ed. , , and (Munich and Leipzig) 285–99.Google Scholar
(1982), ‘M’ Megonius Leo from Petelia (regio iii): a private benefactor from the local aristocracy', ZPE 45: 155–65.Google Scholar
(1970), Esclaves et affranchis impériaux sous le Haut-Empire romain. Rôle politique et administratif (Naples).Google Scholar
(1974), Domestique et fonctionnaire sous le Haut-Empire romain. La condition de l'affranchi et de l'esclave du prince (Paris).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984), ‘Augustus’ legislation on morals. Which morals and what aims?', Symbolae Osloenses 59: 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965), ‘La fonction sociale des legs d'après la jurisprudence classique’, RHDFE 43: 333–408.Google Scholar
(1984a), Slaves and Masters in the Roman Empire. A Study in Social Control (Brussels; 2nd edn Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
(1984b), ‘The vicesima libertatis. Its history and significance’, Klio 66: 175–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990), ‘Servus onerosus: Roman law and the troublesome slave’, Slavery and Abolition 11: 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992), ‘“The regular, daily traffic in slaves”: Roman history and contemporary history’, CJ 87: 125–38.Google Scholar
(2008), ‘Seneca and slavery’, in Seneca. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies ed. (Oxford) 334–47.Google Scholar
(1989), ‘Approaching freedom: the manumission of slaves in Suriname, 1760–1828’, Slavery and Abolition 10: 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Hadrien et le sang des esclaves’, in Historiae Augustae. Colloquium Barcinonense. Atti dei Convegni sulla Historia Augusta IX ed. and (Bari) 67–82.Google Scholar
(1966), ‘The Roman mob’, P&P 35: 3–27, reprinted in Studies in Ancient Society ed. (London, 1974) 74–102.Google Scholar
(1983a), ‘Marcus Aurelius and slavery’, in Modus Operandi. Essays in Honour of Geoffrey Rickman ed. , , and (London) 139–50.Google Scholar
(1990), ‘Some comments on the status of imperial freedmen (The case of Ti. Claudius Aug. lib. Classicus)’, ZPE 82: 271–85.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘Il sevirato nella società della regio X’, in I ceti medi in Cisalpina. Atti del Colloquio internazionale 14–16 settembre 2000 Milano ed. and (Milan) 67–78.Google Scholar
(1984), Schiavi e liberti dei Volusii Saturnini. Le iscrizioni del colombario sulla via Appia antica (Rome).Google Scholar
(1995), ‘Per uno studio sulla diffusione degli *Augustales nel mondo romano: l'esempio della regio IV Augustea’, ZPE 108: 123–39.Google Scholar
and (2006), ‘Approfondimenti sull'album e la lex familiae Silvani da Trebula Mutuesca’, Minima Epigraphica et Papyrologica 11: 210–54.Google Scholar
(1987), ‘Fiktion und Wirklichkeit: soziale und rechtliche Strukturen des römischen Bankwesens’, ZSSR 104: 465–558.Google Scholar
(1988), ‘Cum in familia nubas: Zur wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Bedeutung der familia libertorum’, ZSSR 105: 312–33.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Slave naming patterns: onomastics and the taxonomy of race in eighteenth-century Jamaica’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 31: 325–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1939), ‘Epigrafe sepolcrale contenente dispozioni testamentarie’, Epigraphica 1: 160–2.Google Scholar
(1987), ‘Aristotle and the anonymous opponents of slavery’, in Classical Slavery ed. (London) 22–41.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘Archivi privati e storia sociale delle città Campane: Puteoli ed Herculaneum’, in Prosopographie und Sozialgeschichte. Studien zur Methodik und Erkenntnismöglichkeit der kaiserzeitlichen Prosopographie ed. (Cologne) 339–50.Google Scholar
(1996a), ‘La ricostruzione dell’élite municipale ercolanese degli anni 50–70: problemi di metodo e risultati preliminari', Cahiers Glotz 7: 167–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996b), ‘L’élite municipale di Puteoli fra la tarda repubblica e Nerone', in Les élites municipales de l'Italie péninsulaire des Gracques à Néron ed. (Naples and Rome) 91–110.Google Scholar
(1996c), ‘Inscrizioni nuove o riedite da Puteoli, Cumae, Misenum: decretum Augustalium da Misenum’, AIONArchStAnt 3: 161–8.Google Scholar
(1999a), Tabulae Pompeianae Sulpiciorum. Edizione critica dell'archivio puteolano dei Sulpicii (Rome).Google Scholar
(1999b), ‘Un nuovo decreto decurionale puteolano con concessione di superficies agli Augustali e le entrate cittadine da solarium’, in Il capitolo delle entrate nelle finanze municipali in occidente ed in oriente. Actes de la Xe rencontre franco-italienne sur l'épigraphie du monde romain (Coll. d'École Fr. Rome 256: Rome) 1–23.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘La società ercolanese’, in Gli antichi ercolanesi. Antropologia, società, economia ed. (Naples) 67–70.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Albi degli Augustales di Liternum della seconda metà del II secolo’, Annali di Archaeologia e Storia Antica 8: 163–82.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘Per una riedizione dell'archivio ercolanese di L. Venidius Ennychus’, Cron.Erc. 32: 257–80.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Il credito negli archivi campani: il caso di Puteoli e di Herculaneum’, in Credito e moneta nel mondo romano ed. (Bari) 69–98.Google Scholar
(2006a), ‘Cittadinanza romana, Latini Iuniani e lex Aelia Sentia: alcuni nuovi dati dalla riedizione delle Tabulae Herculanenses’, in Tradizione romanistica e costituzione ed. (Naples) 887–904.Google Scholar
(2006b), ‘La società ercolanese alla luce della riedizione delle Tabulae Herculanenses. L’élite municipale fra Claudio e Vespasiano. i: un'oligarchia ritrovata', Ostraka 15: 9–29.Google Scholar
(2006c), ‘Per una riedizione dell'archivio ercolanese di L. Venidius Ennychus II’, Cron.Erc. 36: 189–211.Google Scholar
(2002), La lex Roscia Theatralis e Marziale: il ciclo del libro v (Como).
(2002), ‘Le qualifiche di sexviri iuniores e sexviri seniores nelle attestazioni epigrafiche della Cisalpina: una nuova interpretazione storico-epigrafica’, in I ceti medi in Cisalpina. Atti del Colloquio internazionale 14–16 Settembre 2000 Milano ed. and (Milan) 99–111.Google Scholar
(2006), Spirits of the Dead. Roman Funerary Commemoration in Western Europe (Cambridge).Google Scholar
(2000), ‘Les enseignements fournis par les archives des Sulpicii pour une meilleure connaissance de certaines couches de la société de Puteoli’, Cahiers Glotz 11: 107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972), ‘Les esclaves dans les “Verrines”’, in Actes du Colloque 1971 sur l'esclavage (Paris) 175–92.Google Scholar
(1999), ‘Horace, libertino patre natus’, in Construction, reproduction et représentation des patriciats urbains de l'antiquité au XXe siècle ed. (Tours) 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), ‘Citoyens romains, esclaves et affranchis: problèmes de démographie’, REA 103: 443–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989), ‘Slaves, freedmen and the politics of freedom in Brazil: the experience of blacks in the city of Rio’, Slavery and Abolition 10: 64–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991), Final Judgments. Duty and Emotion in Roman Wills, 200 B.C.–A.D. 250 (Berkeley).Google Scholar
(1967), Freigelassene und Sklaven im Dienst der römischen Kaiser. Studien zu ihrer Nomenklatur (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
(1972), ‘Zur Entstehung der Freilassung mit Bürgerrechtserwerb in Rom’, ANRWi.2: 59–67.Google Scholar
(1980), ‘Grundfragen der römischen Sozialstruktur’, in Studien zur antiken Sozialgeschichte. Festschrift Friedrich Vittinghoff ed. W. Eck, H.s Galsterer, and H. Wolff (Cologne) 197–228.Google Scholar
(1979a), Sklaven und Freigelassene als Grammatiker und Philologen im antiken Rom (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
(1979b), ‘Reflexe erlebter Unfreiheit in den Sentenzen des Publilius Syrus und den Fabeln des Phaedrus. Zur Problematik ihrer Verifizierung’, Hermes 107: 199–220.Google Scholar
(1992), ‘Les ambitions d'un affranchi à Nimes sous le Haut-Empire: l'argent et la famille’, Cahiers Glotz 3: 241–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991), The Houses of Roman Italy 100 B.C.–A.D. 250. Ritual, Space, and Decoration (Berkeley).Google Scholar
(2003), Art in the Lives of Ordinary Romans. Visual Representation and Non-elite Viewers in Italy, 100 B.C.–A.D. 315 (Berkeley).Google Scholar
(1979), ‘Preoccupazioni etniche nelle leggi di Augusto sulla “manumissio servorum”?’, in Conoscenze etniche e rapporti di convivenza nell'antichità ed. (Milan) 158–77.Google Scholar
(1984), ‘Some neglected ordines: the apparitorial status-group’, in Des ordres à Rome ed. (Paris) 23–60.Google Scholar
(1991), ‘The Augustan law on adultery: the social and cultural context’, in The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present ed. and (New Haven and London) 109–26.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Capitalism and freedom: manumissions and the slave market in Louisiana, 1725–1820’, Journal of Economic History 65: 1008–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989), ‘Iconografia, ideologia e status a Brixia nel I secolo d.c.: la lastra sepolcrale del seviro Anteros Asiaticus’, RdA 13: 59–75.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Famiglia e integrazione sociale: percorsi dei liberti’, in Hiberia-Italia. Italia-Hiberia. Convegno internazionale di epigrafia e storia antica Gargnano-Brescia (28–30 aprile 2005) ed. and (Milan) 339–51.Google Scholar
(2009), Bürgerrechtsentzug oder Fremdenausweisung? Studien zu den Rechten von Latinern und weiteren Fremden sowie zum Bürgerrechtswechsel in der Römischen Republik (5. bis frühes 1.Jh.v.Chr.) (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
(1906), On the Social Standing of Freedmen as Indicated in the Latin Writers (Baltimore).Google Scholar
(1988), ‘A. Umbricius Scaurus of Pompeii’, in Studia Pompeiana et Classica in Honor of Wilhelmina F. Jashemski (New Rochelle, NY) 19–49.Google Scholar
and (2003), ‘Petron und die Inschriften’, in Petroniana. Gedenkschrift für Hubert Petersmann ed. and (Heidelberg) 95–107.Google Scholar
(1995), ‘Mourning and the making of ancestors in the Testamentum Relief’, AJA 99: 667–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Acquiring an ancestor: the importance of funerary statuary among the non-elite orders of Rome’, in Images of Ancestors ed. (Aarhus) 223–46.Google Scholar
and (1983), Un impegno per Pompei. Fotopiano e documentazione della necropoli di Porta Nocera (Milan).Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Potior utroque Vespasianus: Vespasian and his predecessors in Tacitus’ Histories', Arethusa 39: 245–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974), ‘Puteoli in the second century of the Roman Empire: a social and economic study’, JRS 64: 104–24.Google Scholar
(1990), ‘Italien’, in Europäische Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte in der römischen Kaiserzeit ed. (Stuttgart) 375–426.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘Memory, money and status at Misenum: three new inscriptions from the collegium of the Augustales’, JRS 90: 126–44.Google Scholar
(2008), ‘Les P. Anthestii: une famille d'affranchis dans l’élite municipale de la colonie romaine de Dion', in La fin du statut servile? Affranchissement, libération, abolition ed. (Besançon) 185–202.Google Scholar
(1984), ‘De l'esclavage à l'anneau d'or du chevalier’, in Des ordres à Rome ed. (Paris) 217–41.Google Scholar
(1988), L'ordre équestre sous les Julio-Claudiens (Coll. École Fr. Rome 108: Rome and Paris).Google Scholar
(2005), Romulus' Asylum. Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian (Oxford).Google Scholar
(1993), Clientèles et pouvoir à l'époque de Cicéron (Coll. École Fr. Rome 182: Rome and Paris).Google Scholar
(1986), ‘Family finances: Terentia and Tullia’, in The Family in Ancient Rome: New Perspectives ed. (London) 93–120.Google Scholar
, , and (2002), ‘Die Wirtschaft der römischen Kaiserzeit in der modernen Deutung: einige Überlegungen’, in Die Ökonomie des Imperium Romanum. Strukturen, Modelle und Wertungen im Spannungsfeld von Modernismus und Neoprimitivismus ed. (St. Katharinen) 1–66.Google Scholar
(1990), ‘L’imperium du pater familias', in Parenté et stratégies familiales dans l'antiquité romaine ed. and (Rome) 475–94.Google Scholar
(1974), The Economy of the Roman Empire. Quantitative Studies (Cambridge; 2nd edn 1982).Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Who were the Equites?’, in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman Historyxiii ed. (Coll. Latomus 301: Brussels) 183–223.Google Scholar
(1976), ‘Recherches sur la répartition géographique et chronologique des termes sevir Augustalis, Augustalis et sevir dans l'Empire romain‘, Epigraphische Studien 11: 143–214.Google Scholar
(1989), ‘Cognomen est omen? Quelques jalons pour une anthroponymie sociale du monde romain’, in Mélanges P. Lévêqueii (Paris) 183–205.Google Scholar
(1995), ‘Die “humanitas” des Petronius oder Diagnose eines gesellschaftlichen Verfalls’, in Prinzipat und Kultur im 1. und 2. Jahrhundert ed. , , and (Bonn) 192–202.Google Scholar
(1994), ‘Die Bedeutung der claudischen Regierungszeit für die administrative Entwicklung des römischen Reiches’, in Die Regierungszeit des Kaisers Claudius (41–54 n.Chr.). Umbruch oder Episode? ed. (Mainz) 23–34.Google Scholar
(1999), ‘Ordo equitum romanorum, ordo libertorum. Freigelassene und ihre Nachkommen im römischen Ritterstand’, in L'ordre équestre. Histoire d'une aristocratie (IIe siècle av. J.-C. – IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.) ed. , , and (Rome) 5–29.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Die grosse Pliniusinschrift aus Comum: Funktion und Monument’, in Varia epigraphica. Atti del colloquio internazionale di epigrafia Bertinoro, 8–10 giugno 2000 ed. and (Faenza) 225–35.Google Scholar
and (1993), Sklaven und Freigelassene in der Gesellschaft der römischen Kaiserzeit (Darmstadt).Google Scholar
(1988), Capuanische Grabsteine: Untersuchungen zu den Grabsteinen römischer Freigelassener aus Capua, BAR int. ser. 417 (Oxford).
(1993), ‘“Marriage more shameful than adultery”: slave–mistress relationships, “mixed marriages” and late Roman law’, Phoenix 47: 125–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), Law and Family in Late Antiquity. The Emperor Constantine's Marriage Legislation (Oxford).Google Scholar
(2002), ‘L'augustalità nell'Etruria nord-occidentale: i casi di Luni, Lucca e Pisa’, Ostraka 11: 99–112.Google Scholar
(1976), ‘Les affranchis et la vie municipale dans la péninsule ibérique sous le Haut-Empire romain: quelques remarques’, in Actes du colloque 1973 sur l'esclavage (Paris) 417–57.Google Scholar
(1981), Libertus. Recherches sur les rapports patron–affranchi à la fin de la république romaine (Rome).Google Scholar
(1996), La libertas ex divi Claudii edicto. Schiavitù e valori morali nel I secolo d.C. (Catania).Google Scholar
(1981), ‘L'intervention de l'esclave dans le discours polémique cicéronien: étude du corpus des “Philippiques”’, Index 10: 82–172.Google Scholar
(1984), ‘Slavery and supervision in comparative perspective: a model’, Journal of Economic History 44: 635–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982), ‘Rechtshistorische Bemerkungen zur Ausdehnung des römischen Bürgerrechts und zum ius Italicum unter dem Prinzipat’, ANRWii.14: 1017–58.Google Scholar
(1988), ‘Die Freigelassenen und ihre Nachkommen im öffentlichen Leben des republikanischen Rom’, Klio 70: 468–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), ‘La legislazione tribunizia di Publio Clodio Pulcro (58 a.C.) e la ricerca del consenso a Roma’, SCO 47: 245–341.Google Scholar
(1975), ‘Slavery, incentives and manumission: a theoretical model’, Journal of Political Economy 83: 923–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008), ‘“Independent” slaves in classical Athens and the ideology of slavery’, in From Captivity to Freedom. Themes in Ancient and Modern Slavery ed. and (Leicester) 121–46.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Nec quicquam ingenuum habere potest officina? Spatial contexts of urban production at Pompeii, ad 79’, BABesch 82: 129–48.Google Scholar
(1971), ‘The relation of the slave and the client to the master or patron in medieval Islam’, International Journal of Middle East Studies 2: 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1916), ‘Race mixture in the Roman Empire’, American Historical Review 21: 689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982), ‘A proposito di ex-schiavi e della loro integrazione in ambito cittadino a Roma’, Opus 1: 97–103.Google Scholar
(1979), ‘Law, technology and social change: the equipping of Italian farm tenancies’, ZSSR 96: 204–28.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘Subsistence annuities and per capita income in the early Roman Empire’, CPh 88: 222–30.Google Scholar
(1985), ‘Where have all the freedmen gone? On an anomaly in the Jewish grave-inscriptions from Rome’, Journal of Jewish Studies 36: 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘The internal organization of the Arretine terra sigillata industry: problems of evidence and interpretation’, JRS 87: 111–55.Google Scholar
(1981), ‘Augustus’ legislation on morals and marriage', Philologus 125: 126–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997), ‘Familial structures in Roman Italy: a regional approach’, in The Roman Family in Italy. Status, Sentiment, Space ed. and (Oxford) 239–79.Google Scholar
(1971), Untersuchungen zum römischen Städtewesen auf der iberischen Halbinsel (Berlin)Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Zur Frage “Sklaverei und Humanität” anhand von Quellen des römischen Rechts’, in Fünfzig Jahre Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei an der mainzer Akademie 1950–2000. Miscellanea zum Jubiläum ed. and (Stuttgart) 51–72.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Cum aliter nulla domus tuta esse possit …: fear of slaves and Roman law’, in Fear of Slaves – Fear of Enslavement in the Ancient Mediterranean ed. (Besançon) 145–64.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Making citizens: the operation of the Lex Irnitana’, in Administration, Prosopography and Appointment Policies in the Roman Empire ed. (Amsterdam) 215–29.Google Scholar
(1975a), ‘Descendants of freedmen in local politics: some criteria’, in The Ancient Historian and his Materials. Essays in Honour of C. E. Stevens ed. (Farnborough) 167–80.Google Scholar
(1976), ‘Urban property investment’, in Studies in Roman Property ed. (Cambridge) 123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981), ‘Independent freedmen and the economy of Roman Italy under the Principate’, Klio 63: 359–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974), ‘“Générosité” romaine et “avarice” greque: sur l'octroi du droit de cité’, in Mélanges W. Seston (Paris) 207–16.Google Scholar
(1981), ‘La citoyenneté en Grèce et à Rome: participation et intégration’, Ktema 6: 167–79.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Family imagery and family values in Roman Italy’, in The Roman Family in the Empire. Rome, Italy and Beyond ed. (Oxford) 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), ‘Social identity and the dignity of work in freedmen's reliefs’, in The Art of Citizens, Soldiers and Freedmen in the Roman World ed. and (BAR int. ser. 1526: Oxford) 19–29.Google Scholar
and (1991), ‘Iscrizioni pompeiane inedite scoperte tra gli anni 1954–1978’, Atti Acc. Pont. 39: 273–8.Google Scholar
and (1986), ‘The lex Irnitana: a new copy of the Flavian municipal law’, JRS 76: 147–243.Google Scholar
(1981), Sozialökonomische Vorstellungen in der kaiserzeitlichen griechischen Literatur (1.–3. Jh. n. Chr.) (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
(1995), ‘A study in survival. The case of the freedman L. Domitius Phaon’, Athenaeum 83: 401–10.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Note sull'iconografia di un rilievo funerario da Amiternum: modelli e scelte figurative di un liberto municipale’, Archeologia Classica 57: 387–403.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘La tomba di Trimalchione. Saggio di commento archeologico al Satyricon’, in Lo sguardo archeologico. I normalisti per Paul Zanker ed. (Pisa) 77–95.Google Scholar
(2008), ‘Vectigalia nervos esse rei publicae’. Die indirekten Steuern in der Römischen Kaiserzeit von Augustus bis Diokletian (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
(1992), ῾Zur Wirtschaftsmentalität nichtsenatorischer provinzialer Oberschichten: Aemilia Pudentilla und ihre Verwandten', Klio 74: 250–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996), ‘Slave names and naming in Barbados 1650–1830’, William and Mary Quarterly 53: 685–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1984), ‘Slave manumissions and freedmen in seventeenth-century Barbados’, William and Mary Quarterly 41: 390–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1983), Statius and the Silvae. Poets, Patrons and Epideixis in the Graeco-Roman World (Liverpool).Google Scholar
(1980b), ‘Towards a study of the Roman slave trade’, in The Seaborne Commerce of Ancient Rome. Studies in Archaeology and History ed. and (MAAR 36: Rome) 117–40.Google Scholar
(1986), ‘The Roman father's power of life and death’, in Studies in Roman Law in Memory of A. Arthur Schiller ed. and (Leiden) 81–95.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘The late republic’, in Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World ed. , , and (Cambridge) 511–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), The Familia Urbana during the Early Empire. A Study of Columbaria Inscriptions (BAR int. ser. 1440: Oxford).Google Scholar
(2002), ‘Les collèges de magistri et la communauté italienne de Délos’, in Les Italiens dans le monde grec ed. and (BCH Suppl. 41: Paris) 67–76.Google Scholar
(2000), Die Nekropolen von Ostia: Untersuchungen zu den Gräberstrassen vor der Porta Romana und an der Via Laurentina (Munich).Google Scholar
(1975), Organization of Roman Brick Production in the First and Second Centuries A.D. (Helsinki).Google Scholar
(1963), Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la république (Paris).Google Scholar
(1997), Ex Ancilla Natus.Untersuchungen zu den ‘Hausgeborenen’ Sklaven und Sklavinnen im Westen des römischen Kaiserreiches (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Soziale Mobilität in der römischen Gesellschaft: Persönliche Freiheit im Spiegel von Statusprozessen’, in Fünfzig Jahre Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei an der mainzer Akademie 1950–2000. Miscellanea zum Jubiläum ed. and (Stuttgart) 171–83.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Die Bedeutung der antiken Sklaverei für die Menschenrechte’, in Unfreie Arbeits- und Lebensverhältnisse von der Antike bis in die Gegenwart ed. (Hildesheim) 56–81.Google Scholar
(1989), ‘Claudius Abascantus aus Ostia. Die Nomenklatur eines libertus und sein sozialer Aufstieg’, ZPE 76: 167–74.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Die Häuser der Senatores in Rom: gesellschaftliche und politische Funktion’, in Senatores populi romani. Realität und mediale Präsentation einer Führungsschicht ed. and (Stuttgart) 19–52.Google Scholar
(1939), ‘Les magistri des collèges et le relèvement de Capoue de 111 a 71 avant J.-C.’, MEFRA 56: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘Gender and manumission of slaves in colonial Brazil: the prospect of freedom in Sabará, Minas Gerais, 1710–1809’, Slavery and Abolition 18.2: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘The rhetoric of romanitas: the “tomb of the Statilii” frescoes reconsidered’, MAAR 50: 89–129.Google Scholar
(1965), ‘Élite mobility in the Roman Empire’, P & P 32: 12–26. Reprinted in Studies in Ancient Society ed. (London, 1974) 103–20.Google Scholar
(1987), ‘Graveyards for historians’, in La Mort, les morts, et l'au-delà dans le monde romain ed. (Caen) 113–26.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘The slave systems of classical antiquity and their reluctant recognition by modern scholars’, in Slavery in Text and Interpretation ed. , , and (Semeia 83/84: Atlanta) 19–66.Google Scholar
(1986), ‘Die divi fratres und die redemptio servi suis nummis (Zu den Motiven der epistula ad Urbium Maximum, Dig. 40,1,4)’, Historia 35: 308–21.Google Scholar
(1995), Paying the Price of Freedom. Family and Labor among Lima's Slaves 1800–1854 (Berkeley).Google Scholar
(1976), ‘Libertas id est civitas: autour d'un conflit négatif de citoyennetés au iie siècle avant J.-C.’, MEFRA 88: 221–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), ‘Constructing childhood on Roman funerary memorials’, in Constructions of Childhood in Ancient Greece and Italy ed. and (Hesperia Supplement 41: Princeton) 323–38.Google Scholar
(1984), Le privilège de liberté. Politique impériale et autonomie municipale dans les cités de l'Occident romain (161–244) (Coll. École Fr. Rome 76: Rome).Google Scholar
(1979), ‘Manumission in colonial Buenos Aires, 1776–1810’, Hispanic American Historical Review 59: 258–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985), ‘Prohibitions and perpetuities: family settlements in Roman law’, ZSSR 102: 220–90.Google Scholar
(2006), The Bankers of Puteoli. Finance, Trade and Industry in the Roman World (Stroud).Google Scholar
(2003a), ‘A golden age. Death, money supply and social succession in the Roman empire’, in Credito e moneta nel mondo romano ed. (Bari) 181–96.Google Scholar
(2003b), ‘Slavery and the growth of Rome. The transformation of Italy in the second and first centuriesbce’, in Rome the Cosmopolis ed. and (Cambridge) 100–22.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘The early Roman empire: consumption’, in The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World ed. , , and (Cambridge) 592–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992), Work, Identity and Legal Status at Rome. A Study of the Occupational Inscriptions (Norman).Google Scholar
(1941), ‘Die Anfänge der manumissio und des fiduziarisch gebundenen Eigentum’, ZSSR 61: 153–86.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘The early Roman empire: production’, in The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World ed. , , and (Cambridge) 543–69.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘Die römische Einbürgerung der Freigelassenen und ihre naturrechtliche Begründung bei Dionysios von Halikarnassos’, Laverna 13: 91–117.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘Cum vicensimariis magnam mantissam habet (Petronius Satyricon 65.10)’, AJPh 123: 275–86.Google Scholar
and (1996), ‘Freedmen in a slave economy: Minas Gerais in 1831’, Journal of Social History 29: 933–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000), ‘Free coloured in a slave society: São Paulo and Minas Gerais in the early nineteenth century’, Hispanic American Historical Review 80: 913–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977), Roman Group Portraiture. The Funerary Reliefs of the Late Republic and Early Empire (New York).Google Scholar
(1994), ‘Trimalchio als Ökonom. Bemerkungen zur Rolle der Wirtschaft in Petrons Satyricon’, in E fontibus haurire. Beiträge zur römischen Geschichte und zu ihren Hilfswissenschaften ed. and (Paderborn) 117–31.Google Scholar
(1980) ‘Entstehung und Bedeutung der Augustalität. Zur Inschrift der ara Narbonensis (CIL xii 4333)’, Chiron 10: 291–326.Google Scholar
(1993), Porträtreliefs stadtrömischer Grabbauten. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte und zum Verständnis des spätrepublikanisch-frühkaiserzeitlichen Privatporträts (Mainz).Google Scholar
(1985), ‘Eléments courants et exceptionnels de la carrière d'un affranchi: le grammairien Q. Remmius Palémon’, Index 13: 177–87.Google Scholar
(1989), ‘Les réalités romaines dans la “Germanie” de Tacite: le cas des esclaves et des affranchis’, Index 17: 231–9.Google Scholar
(1999), ‘Identität und Unsterblichkeit: Zur Bedeutung des römischen Personennamens’, Klio 81: 156–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Evidence in context. The public and funerary monuments of the Seviri Augustales at Ostia’ (Diss. Princeton).Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Private memory and public interest: municipal identity in imperial Italy’, in The Art of Citizens, Soldiers and Freedmen in the Roman World ed. and (BAR int. ser. 1526: Oxford) 31–43.Google Scholar
(1973), Die rechtliche und soziale Stellung der Magistratus Municipales und der Decuriones in der Übergangsphase der Städte von sich selbstverwaltenden Gemeinden zu Vollzugsorganen des spätantiken Zwangsstaates (2.–4. Jahrhundert der römischen Kaiserzeit (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Freedmen and immortality in the tomb of the Haterii’, in The Art of Citizens, Soldiers and Freedmen in the Roman World ed. and (BAR int. ser. 1526: Oxford) 1–17.Google Scholar
(1990), ‘La place des affranchis dans la vie municipale et dans la vie religieuse’, MEFRA 102: 621–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980), ‘Ein Gesetzentwurf des P. Clodius zur Rechtsstellung der Freigelassenen’, BIDR 83: 254–61.Google Scholar
(1950), ‘Orientamenti per la storia sociale di Pompei’, in Pompeiana. Raccolta di studi per il secondo centenario degli scavi di Pompei', (Naples) 144–66.Google Scholar
(1996), ‘Totum te Caesari debes: Selbstdarstellung und Mentalität einflussreicher kaiserlicher Freigelassener im frühen Principat’, Laverna 7: 67–91.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘The transition from slavery to freedom through manumission: a life-cycle approach applied to the United States and Guadeloupe’, in Slavery in the Development of the Americas ed. , , and (Cambridge).Google Scholar
and (2000), ‘Manumission practices in a late eighteenth-century Brazilian slave parish: Sao José d'El Rey in 1795’, Slavery and Abolition 21: 96–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), ‘Legal history and economic history: the case of the actiones adiecticiae qualitatis’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 67: 205–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Restraining the rich, protecting the poor: symbolic aspects of Roman legislation’, in After the Past. Essays in Ancient History in Honour of H. W. Pleket ed. and (Leiden) 1–45.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Poverty and demography: the case of the Gracchan land reforms’, Mnemosyne 57: 725–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Bürger ohne Staat? Die Integration der Landbevölkerung in der römischen Republik’, in Nicht-normative Steuerung in dezentralen Systemen ed. (Stuttgart) 121–50.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘Freedmen and slaves in the light of legal documents from first-century a.d. Campania’, CQ 52: 555–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994), ‘The size of the Roman population: Beloch and the meaning of the Augustan census figures’, JRS 84: 23–40.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘Le procedure di recensus dalla tarda repubblica al tardo antico e il calcolo della popolazione di Roma’, in La Rome impériale. Démographie et logistique (Rome) 3–76.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘Considerazioni sul numero e sulle fonti di approvvigionamento degli schiavi in età imperiale’, Antiquitas 26: 51–65.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘L’ordo libertinus, la tomba, l'immagine: una nota sulla nascita del busto ritratto', Bullettino Comunale 99: 85–100.Google Scholar
(1992a), ‘Les intérêts des affranchis dans l'agriculture italienne’, MEFRA 104: 709–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992b), ‘Quibus patet curia municipalis. Remarques sur la structure de la classe dirigeante de Pompéi’, Cahiers Glotz 3: 259–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), ‘La condition sociale des affranchis privés au 1er siècle aprés J.-C.’, Annales HSS 50: 1011–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), ‘Les affaires “industrielles” des élites campaniennes sous les Julio-Claudiens et les Flaviens’, MEFRA 112: 243–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), ‘Les affaires commerciales des notables municipaux en Campanie sous les Julio-Claudiens et Flaviens’, Antiquitas 25: 77–102.Google Scholar
(1975), ‘Il liberto Marco Celio Filerote, magistro municipale’, Atene e Roma 20: 44–56.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘The Augustan marriage legislation and social practice: elite endogamy versus male “marrying down”’, in Speculum Iuris. Roman Law as a Reflection of Social and Economic Life in Antiquity, ed. and (Ann Arbor) 46–93.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Missing females? Augustus’ encouragement of marriage between freeborn males and freedwomen', Historia 53: 200–8.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Children among the dead. The influence of urban life on the commemoration of children on tombstone inscriptions’, in Childhood, Class and Kin in the Roman World ed. (London and New York) 74–98.Google Scholar
(1996), ‘Slavery in the Roman Empire: numbers and origins’, Classics Ireland 3: 109–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), ‘“Actio ingrati” (Seneca, De Benef. 3, 6–17: a contribution to contemporary debate?)’, SDHI 52: 61–72.Google Scholar
(1999), ‘Domestic slavery in the Mamluk empire: a preliminary sketch’, in Slavery in the Islamic Middle East ed. (Princeton) 1–23.Google Scholar
(1989), ‘Die Societas Rutiliana und die Ursprünge der prätorischen Erbfolge der Freigelassenen’, ZSSR 106: 358–403.Google Scholar
(1993a), Civitas Operae Obsequium. Tre studi sulla condizione giuridica dei liberti (Naples).Google Scholar
(1993c), ‘Zum Bürgerrecht der Freigelassenen’, in Ars boni et aequi. Festschrift für Wolfgang Waldstein zum 65. Geburtstag ed. and (Stuttgart) 231–60.Google Scholar
(1975), ‘Remarques sur la notion de “puer” à l’époque classique', Bulletin de l'Association Guillaume Budé 14: 221–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘Der griechische und der römische Bürger. Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede im Ensemble gesellschaftlicher Bedingungen’, in Griechenland und Rom. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zu Entwicklungstendenzen und -höhepunkten der antiken Geschichte, Kunst und Literatur ed. (Erlangen and Jena) 41–66.Google Scholar
(2004), Societas. Struktur und Typenvielfalt des römischen Gesellschaftsvertrages (Frankfurt a. M.).Google Scholar
(1978), ‘Note sugli atti di affrancamento di tipo Greco nei papyri (in appendice PSI Inv. 1433)’, Riv.Ital.Fil.Class. 50: 270–84.Google Scholar
(1991), Die Ehegesetze des Augustus. Eine Untersuchung im Rahmen der Gesellschaftspolitik des Princeps (Historia Einzelschriften 67: Stuttgart).Google Scholar
(1984), ‘Condemnation to hard labour in the Roman Empire, from the Julio-Claudians to Constantine’, PBSR 52: 124–47.Google Scholar
and (1993–94), ‘Ex parvo crevit. Proposta per una lettura iconografica della Tomba di Vestorius Priscus fuori Porta Vesuvio a Pompei’, Rivista di Studi Pompeiani 6: 15–52.Google Scholar
(1985), ‘Les esclaves privilégiés à travers le Digeste témoins et acteurs d'une société en crise’, Index 13: 477–90.Google Scholar
(1996), ‘Élites municipales et manufacture en Italie’, in Les élites municipales de l'Italie péninsulaire des Gracques à Néron ed. (Naples and Rome) 181–98.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘The poor in the city of Rome’, in Poverty in the Roman World ed. and (Cambridge) 21–39.Google Scholar
(1988) Elections, Magistrates and Municipal Elite. Studies in Pompeian Epigraphy (Rome).Google Scholar
(1996), ‘Order and disorder in late Pompeian politics’, in Les élites municipales de l'Italie péninsulaire des Gracques à Néron ed. (Naples and Rome) 139–44.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘Mobility and social change in Italian towns during the principate’, in Roman Urbanism. Beyond the Consumer City, ed. (London and New York) 59–82.Google Scholar
(1998b), ‘The album of Canusium and the town councils of Roman Italy’, Chiron 28: 229–54.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Freedmen and freeborn in the necropolis of Imperial Ostia’, ZPE 150: 281–304.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Freedmen and decurions. Epitaphs and social history in Imperial Italy’, JRS 95: 38–63.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Honores libertini: Augustales and seviri in Italy’, in Zwischen Kult und Gesellschaft. Kosmopolitische Zentren des antiken Mittelmeerraumes als Aktions-raum von Kultvereinen und Religionsgemeinschaften ed. (Augsburg) 237–48.Google Scholar
(2007a) ‘CILx 1403: the album from Herculaneum and the nomenclature of the Latini Iuniani’, ZPE 161: 288–90.Google Scholar
(2007b), ‘The civitas sine suffragio: ancient concepts and modern ideology’, Historia 56: 142–58.Google Scholar
(forthcoming), ‘Slavery and manumission in the Roman elite: a study of the columbaria of the Volusii Saturnini and the Statilii Tauri’, in Ancient Slavery and Material Culture ed. .
(1993), Divites et praepotentes. Reichtum und soziale Stellung in der Literatur der Prinzipatszeit (Historia Einzelschriften 70: Stuttgart).Google Scholar
(1975), ‘Wirtschaftliche Grundlagen des Aufstiegs der Freigelassenen im römischen Reich’, Chiron 5: 311–16.Google Scholar
(1987), Les distributions d'argent et de nourriture dans les villes italiennes du Haut-Empire romain (Collection Latomus 198: Brussels).Google Scholar
(1974), L'ordre équestre à l'époque républicaine (312–43 av. J.C.), vol. ii: Prosopographie des chevaliers romains (Paris).Google Scholar
(1977), ‘L'onomastique des groupes dirigeants sous la république’, in Onomastique Latine ed. N. Duval (Paris) 45–58.Google Scholar
(1984), ‘Augustus, government and the propertied classes’, in Caesar Augustus. Seven Aspects ed. and (Oxford) 89–128.Google Scholar
(1994), ‘Economy and society, 133–43 b.c.’, in CAHix 2nd edn ed. , , and (Cambridge) 599–643.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Die (mündliche) Rolle von Briefboten bei Cicero’, in ScriptOralia Romana. Die Römische Literatur zwischen Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit ed. (Tübingen) 229–47.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘Manumission and ethnicity in urban slavery: Salvador, Brazil, 1808–1888’, Hispanic American Historical Review 73: 361–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), ‘Attività imprenditoriali e classi dirigenti nell'età repubblicana. Tre città campione’, Cahiers Glotz 10: 71–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1963), ‘Origo. Studien zur Orts-, Stadt- und Rechtszugehörigkeit in der Antike’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 31: 525–600.Google Scholar
(1983), ‘C. Cassius Longinus: Der Jurist als Rhetor (Bemerkungen zu Tac. Ann. 14, 42–45)’, in Althistorische Studien. Hermann Bengtson zum 70. Geburtstag dargebracht von Kollegen und Schülern ed. (Historia Einzelschriften 40: Wiesbaden) 187–222.Google Scholar
(1988), ‘A misunderstanding about Roman divorce law: the meaning of “praeter” in Digest 24.2.9’, CQ 38: 572–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), ‘Il medicus di Ariminum: una contestualizzazione archeologica dalla domus “del chirurgo”’, RSA 37: 101–18.Google Scholar
(1985), ‘Augustales along the Bay of Naples: a case for their early growth’, Historia 34: 64–101.Google Scholar
(1990), ‘The Augustales in the Augustan scheme’, in Between Republic and Empire. Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate ed. and (Berkeley) 364–79.Google Scholar
(1980), ‘Manumissio in circo? Zum sog. Freilassungsrelief in Mariemont’, in Studien zur antiken Sozialgeschichte. Festschrift Friedrich Vittinghoff ed. W. Eck, H. Galsterer, and H. Wolff (Cologne) 179–95.Google Scholar
and (1987), ‘La casa del liberto P. Confuleius Sabbio a Capua e i suoi mosaici’, MEFRA 99: 753–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ed. (2004), Libitina e dintorni. Libitina e i luci sepolcrali. Le leges libitinariae campane. Iura sepulcrorum: vecchie e nuove iscrizioni (Rome).
(2007), ‘Servire a Palazzo. Nuove testimonianze di officiales Augustorum da Roma’, in Herrschen und Verwalten. Der Altag der römischen Administration in der Hohen Kaiserzeit ed. and (Cologne) 60–79.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Loyal slaves and loyal wives. The crisis of the outsider-within and Roman exemplum literature’, in Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture. Differential Equations ed. and (London and New York) 152–73.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘The “consumer city” domesticated? The Roman city in élite economic strategies’, in Roman Urbanism. Beyond the Consumer City ed. (London) 83–111.Google Scholar
(2006), Landscapes and Cities. Rural Settlement and Civic Transformation in Early Imperial Italy (Oxford).Google Scholar
(1981), ‘Affranchis et citoyenneté: les effets juridiques de l'affranchissement sous le Haut-Empire’, Ktema 6: 181–92.Google Scholar
(1999), ‘Les bourgeoisies gallo-romaines sous le haut-empire’, in XI Congresso internazionale di epigrafia Greca e Latina II (Rome) 2.263–73.Google Scholar
(1981), ‘L'esclave/l'affranchi “médiateur” dans les relations d' “amicitia” dans la correspondance de Cicéron’, Index 10: 173–233.Google Scholar
(1999), Mietwohnungen in Pompeji und Herkulaneum. Untersuchungen zur Architektur, zum Wohnen und zur Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte der Vesuvstädte (Munich).Google Scholar
(2008), Contested Triumphs: Politics, Pageantry, and Performance in Livy's Republican Rome (Berkeley).Google Scholar
(1988), ‘Labor and unemployment in the Roman Empire: some preliminary remarks’, in Soziale Randgruppen und Aussenseiter im Altertum ed. (Graz) 267–76.Google Scholar
(1990), ‘Wirtschaft’, in Europäische Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte in der römischen Kaiserzeit ed. (Stuttgart) 25–160.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Slave-boys for sexual and religious service: images of pleasure and devotion’, in Flavian Rome. Culture, Image, Text ed. and (Leiden) 149–66.Google Scholar
(1982), ‘Provvedimenti legislativi e attività censoria di Claudio verso gli schiavi e i liberti’, RSA 12: 143–74.Google Scholar
(1991), ‘Status and status concern in the Greco-Roman dream-books’, Anc. Soc. 22: 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975), Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity (New York).Google Scholar
(1987), ‘Il microcosmo di C. Pompeius Trimalchio Maecenatianus. Schiavi e liberti nella casa di un mercante romano (Petr. 27–78)’, Index 15: 207–26.Google Scholar
(1987), ‘Tomb and suburb’, in Römische Gräberstrassen. Selbstdarstellung – Status – Standard ed. and (Munich) 25–41.Google Scholar
(1994), ‘The city of Rome and the plebs urbana in the late republic’, in CAH 2nd edn, ix, ed. , , and (Cambridge) 644–88.Google Scholar
(1996), ‘Rome and its development under Augustus and his successors’, in CAH 2nd edn, x, ed. , , and (Cambridge) 782–811.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘Rome and Italy’, in CAH 2nd ed. xi, ed. A. K. Bowman, P. Garnsey, and D. Rathbone (Cambridge) 405–43.Google Scholar
and (1981), ‘Droit romain et sociéte. Les hommes libres qui passent pour esclaves et l'esclavage volontaire’, Historia 30: 472–97.Google Scholar
and (2008), ‘Financial intermediation in first-century ad Rome and eighteenth-century England’, in Pistoi dia tèn technèn. Bankers, Loans and Archives in the Ancient World. Studies in Honour of Raymond Bogaert ed. , , and (Leuven) 371–419.Google Scholar
(1966), ‘Family life among the lower classes at Rome in the first two centuries of the Empire’, CPh 61: 70–83.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘The iconography of Roman childhood’, in The Roman Family in Italy. Status, Sentiment, Space ed. and (Oxford) 205–38.Google Scholar
(1976), ‘The Ciceronian aristocracy and its properties’, in Studies in Roman Property ed. (Cambridge) 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), ‘Freedmen in Roman comedy’, in Theater and Society in the Classical World ed. (Ann Arbor) 215–33.Google Scholar
(1971), ‘Usurpation of status and status symbols in the Roman Empire’, Historia 20: 275–302.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Les élites locales et municipales de la colonie de Vienne au Haut-Empire’, AC 67: 77–120.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘Domus und res publica. Die politisch-soziale Bedeutung des aristokratischen “Hauses” in der späten römischen Republik’, in Zwischen ‘Haus’ und ‘Staat’. Antike Höfe im Vergleich ed. (HZ Beiheft 23: Munich) 73–90.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘Sklavenfreilassungen in der späten römischen Republik als Beispiel für soziale Mobilität’, Laverna 4: 45–54.Google Scholar
(1995), Religion and Authority in Roman Carthage from Augustus to Constantine (Oxford).Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Les affranchi(e)s sous l'Empire: richesse, évergétisme et promotion sociale. Le cas d'une affranchie de Gytheion (Laconie)’, in Esclavage antique et discrimination socio-culturelles ed. and (Berne) 233–41.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Re-thinking the social organisation of trade and industry in first century ad Pompeii’, in Roman Working Lives and Urban Living ed. and (Oxford) 88–105.Google Scholar
(2001), Constructing Autocracy. Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome (Princeton and Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Dining Posture in Ancient Rome. Bodies, Values, and Status (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), ‘Römische Freigelassene als Aufsteiger und Petrons Cena Trimalchionis’, Gymnasium 102: 79–92.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘To have and to be: food, status, and the peculium of agricultural slaves’, JRA 18: 278–92.Google Scholar
(1988), The Magistrates of the Roman Professional Collegia in Italy from the First to the Third Century A.D. (Pisa).Google Scholar
(1991), ‘Corporal punishment, authority, and obedience in the Roman household’, in Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome ed. (Oxford) 144–65.Google Scholar
(1996), ‘The hierarchical household in Roman society: a study of domestic slavery’, in Serfdom and Slavery. Studies in Legal Bondage ed. (London and New York) 112–29.Google Scholar
and (1984), ‘Tombstones and Roman family relations in the principate: civilians, soldiers and slaves’, JRS 74: 124–56.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘Manumissio vindicta in ambiente provinciale: problemi e proposte’, Chiron 28: 179–85.Google Scholar
(1962), ‘Une colonie latine d'affranchis, Carteia (Tite-Live, H.R. 43.3)’, RHD 40: 135–52.Google Scholar
(1998), Spitzenmanagement in Republik und Kaiserzeit. Die Prokuratoren von Privatpersonen im Imperium Romanum vom 2. Jh. v. Chr. bis zum 3. Jh. n. Chr. (St. Katharinen).Google Scholar
(1989), Imperii insignia. Sella Curulis and Fasces. Zur Repräsentation römischer Magistrate (Mainz).Google Scholar
(1990), ‘Free-born and manumitted bailiffs in the Graeco-Roman world’, CQ 40: 591–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), ‘Sklaven und Freigelassene als Pächter und ihre ökonomische Funktion in der römischen Landwirtschaft (Colonus-Studien iii)’, in De agricultura. In memoriam Pieter Willem De Neeve (1945–1990) ed. H. Sancisi-Weerdenburg, R. J. Van Der Spek, H. C. Teitler, and H. T. Wallinga (Amsterdam) 182–96.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘Quantifying the sources of slaves in the early Roman empire’, JRS 87: 156–69.Google Scholar
(1999a), ‘The slave population of Roman Italy: speculation and constraints’, Topoi 9: 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999b), ‘The demography of Roman slavery and manumission’, in La démographie historique antique ed. and (Arras) 107–15.Google Scholar
(2005b), ‘Real slave prices and the relative cost of slave labor in the Graeco-Roman world’, Anc. Soc. 35: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008), ‘The comparative economics of slavery in the Greco-Roman world’, in Slave Systems, Ancient and Modern ed. and (Cambridge) 105–26.Google Scholar
(2009), ‘Sex and empire: a Darwinian perspective’, in The Dynamics of Ancient Empires. State Power from Assyria to Byzantium ed. and (Oxford and New York) 255–324.Google Scholar
(1971), ‘The business relations of patron and freedman in Classical Roman law’, in An American Experience of Roman Law (Göttingen) 24–40. First published in Legal Essays in Tribute to O. K. Murray (1935).Google Scholar
(1960), ‘Greek theories of slavery from Homer to Aristotle’, HSCPh 47 (1936) 165–204, reprinted in Slavery in Classical Antiquity ed. (Cambridge) 93–132.Google Scholar
(2003), Die römische Gesellschaft bei Galen. Biographie und Sozialgeschichte (Berlin and New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1983), ‘Überlegungen zum Problem senatorischer Handelsaktivitäten. Teil i’, MBAH 2: 65–90.Google Scholar
(1984), ‘Überlegungen zum Problem senatorischer Handelsaktivitäten. Teil ii’, MBAH 3: 37–76.Google Scholar
(1992), ‘The lex Julia theatralis of Augustus: some remarks on seating problems in theatre, amphitheatre and circus’, LCM 17: 147–60.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘“Freilassung unter Freunden” im römischen Ägypten’, in Fünfzig Jahre Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei an der mainzer Akademie 1950–2000. Miscellanea zum Jubiläum ed. and (Stuttgart) 159–69.Google Scholar
(1989), Freigelassene in den Städten des römischen Hispanien. Juristische, wirtschaftliche und soziale Stellung nach dem Zeugnis der Inschriften (Bonn).Google Scholar
(1982), Servus Index. Sklavenverhör und Sklavenanzeige im republikanischen und kaiserzeitlichen Rom (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
(2001a), ‘Hausgesinde – Hofgesinde. Terminologische Überlegungen zur Funktion der familia Caesaris im 1. Jh. n. Chr.’, in Fünfzig Jahre Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei an der mainzer Akademie 1950–2000. Miscellanea zum Jubiläum ed. and (Stuttgart) 331–52.Google Scholar
(1991), ‘The cultural meaning of death: age and gender in the Roman family’, in The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present ed. and (New Haven and London) 66–90.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘“A wolf by the ears”: M. I. Finley's Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology in historical context’, in M. I. Finley, Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology ed. (Princeton) 3–74.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘L'ascesa sociale delle famiglie degli *augustali’, in Les élites municipales de l'Italie péninsulaire de la mort de César à la mort de Domitien entre continuité et rupture. Classes sociales dirigeantes et pouvoir central ed. (Rome) 431–55.Google Scholar
(1980), ‘A favour to rich freed women (libertinae) in 51 A.D. On Sue. Cl. 19 and the Lex Papia’, RIDA 27: 283–93.Google Scholar
(1983), ‘The lex Iunia and the effects of informal manumission and iteration’, RIDA 30: 211–92.Google Scholar
(2002), ‘Conclusion: some reflections’, in Speculum Iuris. Roman Law as a Reflection of Social and Economic Life in Antiquity ed. and (Ann Arbor) 169–81.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Der Zweck des Senatus Consultum Claudianum von 52 n. Chr.’, ZSSR 122: 138–49.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Slavery, authority, and loyalty: the case of Syncerastus’, in Studien zu Plautus' Poenulus ed. (Tübingen) 291–8.Google Scholar
(1999), ‘L'affranchissement des femmes esclaves à Rome’, in Femmes-esclaves. Modèles d'interprétation anthropologique, économique, juridique ed. and (Naples) 355–68.Google Scholar
(2006), The Roman Clan. The Gens from Ancient Ideology to Modern Anthropology (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990), ‘Republican Capua’, in Roman Eastern Policy and Other Studies in Roman History ed. and (Helsinki) 151–62.Google Scholar
(2000), Irrtümlich als Sklaven gehaltene freie Menschen und Sklaven in unsicheren Eigentumsverhältnissen – homines liberi et servi alieni bona fide servientes (Corpus der römischen Rechtsquellen zur antiken Sklaverei 9: Stuttgart).Google Scholar
(1996), ‘Roman Corinth: the formation of a colonial elite’, in Roman Onomastics in the Greek East. Social and Political Aspects ed. (Athens) 167–82.Google Scholar
(1961), Historische Untersuchungen zu den Sklavenfiguren des Plautus und Terenz (Mainz).Google Scholar
(2006), Lo statuliber e l'adempimento fittizio della condizione. Uno studio sul favor libertatis fra tarda repubblica ed età antonina (Bari).Google Scholar
(1982), The Class Struggle in the Ancient World. From the Archaic Age to the Arab Conquests (London).Google Scholar
(1988), ‘Slavery and other forms of unfree labour’, in Slavery and Other Forms of Unfree Labour ed. (London and New York) 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), ‘Restaurazione dei mores e controllo della mobilità sociale a Roma nel I sec. d.C.: il Senatusconsultum Claudianum de poena feminarum quae servis coniungerentur’, in Femmes-esclaves. Modèles d'interprétation anthropologique, économique, juridique ed. and (Naples) 391–426.Google Scholar
(1914), ‘Die Freigelassenen in ihrer Bedeutung für die Gesellschaft der Alten’, HZ 112: 1–28.Google Scholar
(1973), ‘Deux notes sur l'affranchissement dans les papyrus de l’Égypte romaine', ZPE 11: 143–6.Google Scholar
(1970), ‘Josephus, A.J.xix, 251–252: Opposition to Gaius and Claudius’, AJPh 91: 149–64.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘Sévirat et promotion sociale en Italie nord-orientale’, in Les élites municipales de l'Italie péninsulaire de la mort de César à la mort de Domitien entre continuité et rupture. Classes sociales dirigeantes et pouvoir central ed. (Rome) 373–415.Google Scholar
(1955), The Law of Greco-Roman Egypt in the Light of the Papyri 332 B.C. – 640 A.D. 2nd edn (Warsaw).Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Evoluzione di un “libertino patre natus”: dalla Sat. 1,6 alla Sat. 2,6’, Rudiae 19: 153–202.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘Free-born estate managers in the Graeco-Roman world’, in De Agricultura. In Memoriam Pieter Willem de Neeve (1945–1990) ed. , , , and (Amsterdam) 206–13.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘The labor market of the early Roman Empire’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 34: 513–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), ‘The economy of the early Roman Empire’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 133–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979), ‘Les esclaves et l'esclavage dans l'œuvre de Polybe’, in Schiavitù, manomissione e classi dipendenti nel mondo antico ed. M. Capozza (Rome) 115–42.Google Scholar
(1984), ‘Vitae necisque potestas. Le père, la cité, la mort’, in Du châtiment dans la cité. Supplices corporels et peine de mort dans le monde antique (Rome) 499–548.Google Scholar
(1990), ‘Remarques sur la jurisdiction domestique à Rome’, in Parenté et stratégies familiales dans l'antiquité romaine ed. and (Rome) 450–74.Google Scholar
(1981), ‘The concept of purity of blood in Suetonius’ Life of Augustus', Museum Africum 7: 35–46.Google Scholar
(1967), Aspetti simbolici e magici nella struttura giuridica della manumissio vindicta (Milan).Google Scholar
(1966), ‘Il frontone’, in Sculture municipali dell'area sabellica tra l'età di Cesare e quella di Nerone (Studi Miscellanei 10: 1963–1964) 72–84.Google Scholar
(1994), ‘Per un'eziologia del cambiamento in epoca Claudia. Vicende vicine e vicende lontane’, in Die Regierungszeit des Kaisers Claudius (41–54 n. Chr.). Umbruch oder Episode? ed. (Mainz) 177–90.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Les affranchis dans les collèges professionnels du Haut-Empire romain: l'encadrement civique de la mobilité sociale’, in Les régulations sociales dans l'antiquité ed. (Rennes) 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979), ‘Questions on women domestics in the Roman West’, in Schiavitù, manomissione e classi dipendenti nel mondo antico ed. M. Capozza (Rome) 185–201.Google Scholar
(1980), ‘Urban labour in Rome: mercennarii and tabernarii’, in Non-slave Labour in the Greco-Roman World ed. (Cambridge) 48–64.Google Scholar
(1991), Roman Marriage. Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian (Oxford).Google Scholar
(1996), ‘Social status and social legislation’, in CAH 2nd edn, x, ed. A. K. Bowman, E. Champlin, and A. W. Lintott (Cambridge) 873–904.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Clodius’ projected manumission of slaves in Cicero's Pro Milone', Arctos 40: 167–74.Google Scholar
(1987), Popular Leadership and Collective Behavior in the Late Roman Republic (ca. 80–50 B.C.) (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
(1995–96), ‘“Latini facti”, “peregrini” e “civitas”: note sulla normativa adrianea’, BIDR 37–38: 219–42.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘L'organisation des affaires financières des C. Sulpicii de Pouzzoles (Tabulae Pompeianae Sulpiciorum)’, Cahiers Glotz 11: 161–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), The Economy of Friends. Economic Aspects of Amicitia and Patronage in the Late Republic (Coll. Latomus 269: Brussels).Google Scholar
(2007), ‘The associative order: status and ethos among Roman businessmen in the late Republic and early Empire’, Athenaeum 95: 861–93.Google Scholar
(2008), ‘Faeneratores, negotiatores and financial intermediation in the Roman world’, in Pistoi dia tèn technèn. Bankers, Loans and Archives in the Ancient World. Studies in Honour of Raymond Bogaert ed. , , and (Leuven) 211–29.Google Scholar
(2009), ‘A funny thing happened on my way to the market. Reading Petronius to write economic history’, in Petronius. A Handbook ed. and (Oxford) 125–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), ‘La “plèbe moyenne” sous le Haut-Empire romain’, Annales HSS 55: 1169–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1963), ‘Le relief r14(26) de Mariemont ne figure pas un affranchissement par la vindicte mais une scène de cirque’, Latomus 22: 14–30.Google Scholar
(1991), ‘La plèbe frumentaire à l’époque d'Auguste. Une tentative de définition', in Nourrir la plebe. Actes du colloque tenu à Genève les 28 et 29. IX. 1989 en homage à Denis van Berchem ed. (Basel and Kassel) 43–62.Google Scholar
(1995), Tessera frumentaria. Les procédures de distribution du blé public à Rome à la fin de la république et au début de l'empire (Rome).Google Scholar
(2005), ‘“…manumissus liber((um))ve iussus erit…”: sul capitolo 28 della “lex Irnitana”’, Index 33: 389–431.Google Scholar
(1980), ‘Soziale Struktur und politisches System der hohen römischen Kaiserzeit’, HZ 230: 31–55.Google Scholar
(1990), ‘Gesellschaft’, in Europäische Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte in der römischen Kaiserzeit ed. (Stuttgart) 161–369.Google Scholar
(1955), ‘Manomissione e cittadinanza’, in Studi in onore di U. E. Paoli (Florence) 695–716.Google Scholar
(1982a), ‘Das Relief-Fragment Nr.26 aus Mariemont: Zirkus-Szene oder manumissio vindicta?’, in Studi in onore di Arnaldo Biscardii (Milan) 117–45.Google Scholar
(1982b), ‘Wettbewerbsfreiheit und Konkurrenzverbotsklauseln im antiken und modernen Recht’, ZSSR 99: 188–215.Google Scholar
(1991), ‘Peculium non adeptum videtur tacite donatum. Zum Schicksal des Sonderguts nach der Gewaltentlassung’, Iura 42: 43–95.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Manumissio matrimonii causa. Die Freilassung zwecks Heirat nach den Ehegesetzen des Augustus’, in Fünfzig Jahre Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei an der mainzer Akademie 1950–2000. Miscellanea zum Jubiläum ed. and (Stuttgart) 133–58.Google Scholar
(1986), Operae Libertorum.Untersuchungen zur Dienstpflicht freigelassener Sklaven (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Zum Menschsein von Sklaven’, in Fünfzig Jahre Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei an der mainzer Akademie 1950–2000. Miscellanea zum Jubiläum ed. and (Stuttgart) 31–49.Google Scholar
(1895–1900), Étude historique sur les corporations professionnelles chez les Romains depuis les origines jusqu'à la chute de l'Empire d'Occident (Brussels and Louvain).Google Scholar
(1980), ‘Slavery as an institution: open and closed systems’, in Asian and African Systems of Slavery ed. (Berkeley) 1–15.Google Scholar
(1972), Familia Caesaris. A Social Study of the Emperor's Freedmen and Slaves (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), ‘The status of children in mixed marriages’, in The Family in Ancient Rome. New Perspectives ed. (London) 145–69.Google Scholar
(1990), ‘Where have all the Junian Latins gone? Nomenclature and status in the early Empire’, Chiron 20: 275–305.Google Scholar
(1991), ‘Children of freedmen (and freedwomen)’, in Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome ed. (Oxford) 166–90.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘Children of Junian Latins’, in The Roman Family in Italy. Status, Sentiment, Space ed. and (Oxford) 55–72.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Reconstructing lower-class Roman families’, in Childhood, Class and Kin in the Roman World ed. (London and New York) 101–14.Google Scholar
(1988), ‘Freigelassene – eine diskriminierte Randgruppe?’, in Soziale Randgruppen und Aussenseiter im Altertum: Referate vom Symposion ‘Soziale Randgruppen und antike Sozialpolitik’ in Graz (21 bis 23 September 1987) ed. (Graz) 257–65.Google Scholar
(2008), ‘Libertus et coniunx’, in Antike Lebenswelten. Konstanz – Wandel – Wirkungsmacht. Festschrift für Ingomar Weiler zum 70. Geburtstag ed. et al. (Wiesbaden) 367–79.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘Die Munizipalaristokratie’, in Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft des römischen Reiches im 3. Jahrhundert ed. (Berlin) 245–317.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Eine Sklavin wird frei. Zur Rolle des Geschlechts bei der Freilassung’, in Fünfzig Jahre Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei an der mainzer Akademie 1950–2000. Miscellanea zum Jubiläum ed. and (Stuttgart) 113–32.Google Scholar
(2003), Die Beendigung des Sklavenstatus im Altertum. Ein Beitrag zur vergleich-enden Sozialgeschichte (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
(2004) Sklave der Stadt. Untersuchungen zur öffentlichen Sklaverei in den Städten des römischen Reiches (Historia Einzelschriften 173: Stuttgart).Google Scholar
(1991), ‘Norms of citizenship in ancient Greece’, in City States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, ed. , , and (Ann Arbor and Stuttgart) 135–54.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘The Cena Trimalchionis and biographical narration in Roman middle-class art’, in Narrative and Event in Ancient Art ed. (Cambridge) 299–325.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘The patron as banker’, in ‘Bread and Circuses’. Euergetism and municipal patronage in Roman Italy ed. and (London and New York) 12–27.Google Scholar
(1999), Die Begründung des Sklavenstatus nach ius gentium und ius civile (Corpus der römischen Rechtsquellen zur antiken Sklaverei 1: Stuttgart).Google Scholar
(1999), Roman Homosexuality. Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity (Oxford).Google Scholar
(1995), ‘Libertino patre natus: true or false?’, in Homage to Horace. A Bimillenary Celebration ed. (Oxford) 296–313.Google Scholar
(1971), ‘Intorno all’“accusatio” e “revocatio in servitutem” del liberto ingrato', in Studi in onore di Edoardo Volterra (Milan) ii559–69.Google Scholar
(1974–75) ‘Ricerche sull'alienazione degli schiavi nel diritto romano. Vendita dello schiavo con la clausola “ne manumittatur”’, Index 5: 321–30.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘Hof ohne “Staat”. Die aula Caesaris im 1. und 2. Jahrhundert n. Chr.’, in Zwischen ‘Haus’ und ‘Staat’. Antike Höfe im Vergleich ed. (HZ Beiheft 23: Munich) 91–112.Google Scholar
(1999), Aula Caesaris. Studien zur Institutionalisierung des römischen Kaiserhofes in der Zeit von Augustus bis Commodus (31 v.Chr.–192 n.Chr.) (Munich).Google Scholar
(1985), ‘Who was Crassicius Pansa?’, TAPhA 115: 187–96; reprinted in Historiography and Imagination (Exeter, 1994).Google Scholar
(1987), ‘Conspicui postes tectaque digna deo: the public image of aristocratic and imperial houses in the late republic and early empire’, in L'Urbs. Espace urbain et histoire ed. (Rome) 393–413.Google Scholar
(1995), ‘Die Entwicklung der Gesellschaft von Timgad im 2. bis 4. Jh. n. Chr.’, Klio 77: 266–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘Integrations- und Identifikationsprozesse römischer Freigelassener nach Auskunft der Inschriften (1. Jh. v. Chr.)’, in O Tempora, o mores! Römische Werte und römische Literatur in den letzten Jahrzehnten der Republik ed. , , and (Munich and Leipzig) 289–321.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Der “freie” Sklave. Antike Sklaverei und das Konzept der “inneren” Freiheit’, in Unfreie Arbeits- und Lebensverhältnisse von der Antike bis in die Gegenwart ed. (Hildesheim) 35–55.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Ancient and early modern mortality: experience and understanding’, Economic History Review 60: 373–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), ‘Monumental writing and the expansion of Roman society in the early empire’, JRS 86: 22–39.Google Scholar
(2006), Historiography at the End of the Republic. Provincial Perspectives on Roman Rule (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Not Wholly Free. The Concept of Manumission and the Status of Manumitted Slaves in the Ancient Greek World (Leiden).Google Scholar
(2002), ‘Callistus’ case. Some legal aspects of Roman business activities', in The Transformation of Economic Life under the Roman Empire ed. and (Amsterdam) 116–27.Google Scholar