Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T10:04:48.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Critical Success Factors in Delivering a National Disability Strategy ??? Lessons from International and Comparative Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

Eilionóir Flynn
Affiliation:
Centre for Disability Law, National University of Galway
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Throughout the comparative study conducted in the previous chapter, a number of success factors can be identified by independent evaluation (supported by literature on new public management and community development) as vital to secure successful implementation of a national disability strategy. Although not all of these success factors were present in all of the countries examined, failure to fulfill some of the success factors discussed were sometimes identified as barriers to effective implementation. These factors were key in the selection of the countries examined in the previous chapter and guided the research process to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each national disability strategy. This chapter will identify examples of best practice in achieving each of these aims and will also highlight where failure to address a particular criterion has caused problems for implementation and monitoring. The examples of best practice are primarily taken from the comparative jurisdictions discussed in the previous chapter, but where relevant, a small number of examples (particularly relating to external review and independent monitoring) may be highlighted from countries and jurisdictions not previously considered on the basis that they do not have comprehensive national disability strategies. These examples are included on the basis that best practice in external review or independent monitoring can be found in domestic efforts to implement the CRPD or to review existing legislation, even where a national disability strategy has not been developed. All of the examples highlighted in this chapter are purely illustrative, and do not represent a complete list of international best practice in this area. Rather, they aim to provide a snapshot of positive innovations undertaken that can inform future policy development at the domestic level.

Type
Chapter
Information
From Rhetoric to Action
Implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
, pp. 197 - 286
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LitmusNew Zealand Disability Strategy Implementation Review 2001–2007WellingtonCommissioned by the Office for Disability Issues 2008Google Scholar
Best, J.Hicks, N.Swann, W.Delivering disability equality in partnership with disabled peopleMilton KeynesMilton Keynes Council, Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust and Open University 2006Google Scholar
Javidan, M.Waldman, D. A.Exploring Charismatic Leadership in the Public Sector: Measurement and Consequences 2003 63 Public Administration Review229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okumus, F.A framework to implement strategies in organizations 2003 41 Management Decision871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Participation and the Practice of Rights ProjectRights in Action: Changing Mental Health Services 28th November 2007 Findings of the International PanelBelfast; DublinPPR Project 2007Google Scholar
McMillan, F. V.Browne, N.Green, S.Donnelly, D.A Card Before You Leave: Participation and Mental Health in Northern Ireland 2009 11(1) Health and Human Rights: An International Journal61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office on the Status of People with DisabilitiesDisability Inputs – Ten Year Research: Impact of Government Policies Towards People with Disabilities – Final ReportCape TownOSDP 2003Google Scholar
Ministry of Housing and Social DevelopmentBritish Columbia Disability Strategy – Building the Best System of Support in Canada for Persons with DisabilitiesVictoria 2009Google Scholar
WCG International ConsultantsRecruitment and Retention of Persons with Disabilities in British Columbia Research Project Final Research and Validation ReportVictoriaMinister???s Council on Employment for Persons with Disabilities 2004Google Scholar
Ministry of Housing and Social DevelopmentPresentation to German Delegation on BC Disability StrategyVictoriaMinistry of Housing and Social Development 2009Google Scholar
McClain-Nhalpo, C.Including People with Disabilities in Actions to Reduce Poverty and Hunger: 2020 Focus Brief on the World’s Poor and Hungry PeopleWashington, DCIFPRI 2007Google Scholar
InterActEvaluating participatory, deliberative and co-operative ways of workingBrightonInterAct Evaluation 2001Google Scholar
Landmine Survivors??? Network 2004
National Assembly of People with Disabilites 2009
Disabled Persons??? Assembly (New Zealand) Incorporated 2008
Equality 2025Memorandum of Understanding between Equality 2025 and the Office for DisabilityLondonOffice for Disability Issues 2009Google Scholar
Yeo, R.Bolton, A.“I don’t have a problem, the problem is theirs” The lives and aspirations of Bolivian disabled people in words and picturesLeedsDisability Press 2008Google Scholar
City of Stockholm 2010
Lewin, L.Lewin, B.Bäch, H.Westin, L.A Kinder, Gentler Democracy? The Consensus Model and Swedish Disability Politics 2008 31 Scandinavian Political Studies291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for WomenStrategic Plan 2010/2013PretoriaGovernment Printer and Stationery Office 2010Google Scholar
Victorian Disability Advisory CouncilVDAC Achievements Report 2007–2009MelbourneVDAC 2009Google Scholar
Victorian Disability Advisory CouncilVDAC Achievements Report 2007–2009MelbourneVDAC 2009Google Scholar
Victorian Disability Advisory CouncilVDAC Achievements Report 2007–2009MelbourneVDAC 2009Google Scholar
Pang, T.Pablos-Mendez, A.IJsselsmuiden, C.From Bangkok to Mexico: towards a framework for turning knowledge into action to improve health systems 2004 82 Bulletin of the World Health Organization720Google ScholarPubMed
Green, A.Bennett, S.Sound Choices: Enhancing Capacity for Evidence-Informed Health PolicyGenevaAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research and World Health Organization 2007Google Scholar
Kuipers, P.Kendall, E.Hancock, T.Developing a Rural Community-Based Disability Service: (I) Service Framework and Implementation Strategy 2001 9 Australian Journal of Rural Health22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minister for Disability IssuesWork in Progress 2009: The annual report from the Minister for Disability Issues to the House of Representatives on implementing the New Zealand Disability StrategyWellingtonODI 2009Google Scholar
Emerson, E.Baines, S.Hatton, C.Disability Equality: How will we know we are making a difference?LondonLancaster University, Commissioned by the Office for Disability Issues 2007Google Scholar
Participation and the Practice of Rights ProjectRights in Action: Changing Mental Health Services 28th November 2007 Findings of the International PanelBelfast; DublinPPR Project 2007Google Scholar
Department of FamiliesThe Year in Disability 2009CanberraFAHCSIA 2010Google Scholar
Department of FamiliesNational Disability Strategy Discussion PaperCanberraFAHCSIA 2008Google Scholar
Australian Human Rights CommissionSubmission on National Disability StrategyCanberraAHRC 2008Google Scholar
Australian Human Rights CommissionSubmission on National Disability StrategyCanberraAHRC 2008Google Scholar
Queensland Advocacy IncorporatedHuman Rights Indicators for People with Disability- A resource for disability activists and policy makersBrisbaneQAI 2007Google Scholar
Office for Disability IssuesAnnual report from the Minister for Disability Issues to the House of Representatives on implementing the New Zealand Disability StrategyWellingtonODI 2009Google Scholar
Craig, R. L.Systemic Discrimination in Employment and the Promotion of Ethnic EqualityLeidenMartinus Nijhoff Publishers 2007Google Scholar
Disability Rights CommissionMaking the Duty Work: A guide to the Disability Equality Duty for disabled people and their organisationsLondonDisability Rights Commission 2006Google Scholar
Office for Disability Issues 2009
Office for Disability IssuesThe New Zealand Disability Strategy – Making a World of DifferenceWellingtonMinistry of Health 2001Google Scholar
Mental Health CommissionBlueprint for Mental Health Services in New Zealand: How Things Need to BeWellingtonMental Health Commission 1998Google Scholar
Health Funding AuthorityNational Mental Health Funding Plan 1998–2002Health Funding AuthorityWellington 1998Google Scholar
Department of Families, Housing, Community Services, and Indigenous AffairsNational Disability Strategy Discussion PaperCanberraFAHCSIA 2008Google Scholar
Department of Health and ChildrenReport on Public Consultation: Efficiency and Effectiveness of Disability Services in IrelandDublinStationery Office 2010Google Scholar
Department of Health and ChildrenSummary of Key Proposals from the Review of Disability PolicyDublinOffice for Disability and Mental Health 2010Google Scholar
Disability Federation of Ireland” Special Budget 2010 Edition NewsletterDublinDFI 2010Google Scholar
Department of Health and Children 2009
Irish Human Rights CommissionEnquiry Report on the Human Rights Issues Arising from the Operation of a Residential and Day Care Centre for Persons with a Severe to Profound Intellectual DisabilityDublinIrish Human Rights Commission 2010Google Scholar
Arter, D.From ‘Parliamentary Control’ to ‘Accountable Government’? The Role of Public Committee Hearings in the Swedish Riksdag 2008 61 Parliamentary Affairs1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambridge, P.Ernst, A.Comparing local and national service systems in social care Europe: framework and findings from the STEPS anti-discrimination learning disability project 2006 9(3) European Journal of Social Work279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handisam and Sveriges Kommuner Och Landsting 2010
Handisam and Sveriges Kommuner Och Landsting 2010
Handisam and Sveriges Kommuner Och Landsting 2010
Handisam 2010
Office for Disability IssuesSecretary of States Reports on Disability Equality – OverviewLondonODI 2010Google Scholar
Minister for Disability IssuesWork in Progress 2009: The annual report from the Minister for Disability Issues to the House of Representatives on implementing the New Zealand Disability StrategyWellingtonODI 2009Google Scholar
Zola, I. K.Toward the Necessary Universalizing of a Disability Policy 1989 67(2)(2) The Milbank Quarterly401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, R. L.Systemic Discrimination in Employment and the Promotion of Ethnic EqualityLeidenMartinus Nijhoff Publishers 2007Google Scholar
Department of Economic and Social AffairsFrom Exclusion to Equality: Realizing the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Handbook for Parliamentarians on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional ProtocolGeneva, UN 2007Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Social AffairsFrom Patient to Citizen: A National Action Plan for Disability PolicyStockholm 2000Google Scholar
Department of An TaoiseachSectoral Plans under the Disability Act 2005 – An OverviewDublin 2006Google Scholar
Disability Federation of Ireland 2010
Quinn, G.Bruce, A.Disability and Social Policy in IrelandDublinUniversity College Dublin Press 2003Google Scholar
LitmusNew Zealand Disability Strategy Implementation Review 2001–2007WellingtonCommissioned by the Office for Disability Issues 2008Google Scholar
Hasenfeld, Y.Hill, K.Weaver, D.A Participatory Model for Evaluating Social ProgramsSan FranciscoJames Irvine Foundation 2002Google Scholar
Kuipers, P.Kendall, E.Hancock, T.Evaluation of a rural community-based disability service in Queensland, Australia 2003 3 Rural and Remote Health1Google ScholarPubMed
Holkeri, K.Summa, S.Evaluation of Public Management Approaches in Finland: From Ad Hoc Studies to a Programmatic ApproachHelsinkiMinistry of Finance 1996Google Scholar
Counsel Public Affairs 2010
Beer, C.Charting A Path Forward: Report of the Independent Review of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005TorontoQueen???s Printer for Ontario 2010Google Scholar
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act Alliance 2010
Centre for Strategy and Evaluation ServicesMid-term Evaluation of European Disability Action Plan 2003–2010 on Equal Opportunities for People with DisabilitiesLondonCESC 2009Google Scholar
Republic of Slovenia 2010
McMillan, F. V.Browne, N.Green, S.Donnelly, D.A Card Before You Leave: Participation and Mental Health in Northern Ireland 2009 11 Health and Human Rights: An International Journal61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minister for Disability IssuesWork in Progress 2009: The annual report from the Minister for Disability Issues to the House of Representatives on implementing the New Zealand Disability StrategyWellingtonODI 2009Google Scholar
Purdon, S.Meeting DWP’s long-term information needs on disability: A feasibility reportLondonCorporate Document Services 2005Google Scholar
Office for National StatisticsReport from the Review of Equality DataLondonOffice for National Statistics 2007 http://www.statistics.gov.uk/about/data/measuring-equality/downloads/DataAuditfinal.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office for Disability Issues 2010
Office for Disability Issues 2009
Office for Disability Issues 2010
Academic Network of European Disability experts 2009
Central Statistics OfficeNational Disability Survey 2006 – Volume 2DublinCSO 2010Google Scholar
National Disability AuthorityHow far towards Equality? Measuring how equally people with disabilities are included in Irish societyDublinNDA 2005Google Scholar
Central Statistics OfficeNational Disability Survey 2006 – Volume 2DublinCSO 2010Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×