Adorno, Theodor W.Aesthetic Theory. Trans. Hullot-Kentor, Robert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W.Ästhetische Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar

Alderman, Harold. “The Work of Art and Other Things.” In Ballard and Scott 1973, 157–169.

Alexander, Werner. Hermeneutica Generalis. Zur Konzeption und Entwicklung der allgemeinen Verstehenslehre im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: M&P Verlag für Wissenschaft und Forschung, 1993.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E.Kant's Theory of Taste: A Reading of the “Critique of Aesthetic Judgment.”Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry E.Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambrosio, Francis J. “The Figure of Socrates in Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics.” In Hahn 1997, 259–273.

Ameriks, Karl. Kant and the Historical Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameriks, Karl (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Apel, Karl-Otto. “Regulative Ideas or Truth-Happening?: An Attempt to Answer the Question of the Conditions of the Possibility of Valid Understanding.” Trans. Sommermeier, Ralf. In Hahn 1997, 67–94.

Apel, Karl-Otto and Habermas, Jürgen (eds.). Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1971.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Works of Aristotle. 12 vols. Ed. Ross, W. D.. Various translators. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908–52.Google Scholar

Arndt, Andreas. “Fortschritt im Begriff. Hegels Aufhebung der Hermeneutik in seinen Vorlesungen zur Geschichte der Philosophie.” In Arndt et al., 1998, 108–115.

Arndt, Andreas, Bal, Karol, and Ottmann, Henning (eds.). Hegel-Jahrbuch 1997. Hegel und die Geschichte der Philosophie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar

Ballard, Edward G. and Scott, Charles E. (eds.). Martin Heidegger in Europe and America. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.Google Scholar

Baudelaire, Charles. Art in Paris, 1845–1862. Ed. and trans. Mayne, Jonathan. Oxford: Phaidon, 1981.Google Scholar

Baudelaire, CharlesŒuvres complètes. Ed. Pichois, Claude. Paris: Gallimard, 1976.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick. Schiller as Philosopher: A Re-Examination. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beiser, FrederickThe Romantic Imperative. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Beiser, FrederickThe Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beiser, Frederick “Hegel's Historicism.” In Beiser 1993, 270–300.

Beiser, FrederickThe Fate of Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. Selected Writings. Vol. I. Ed. Bullock, Marcus and Jennings, Michael W.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Benjamin, WalterThe Origin of the German Tragic Drama. Trans. Osborne, J.. London: NLB, 1977.Google Scholar

Benjamin, WalterGesammelte Schriften. Ed. Tiedemann, Rolf and Schweppenhäuser, Hermann. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1974.Google Scholar

Benjamin, WalterCharles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism. Trans. Zohn, Harry. London: NLB, 1968.Google Scholar

Bennett, Tony. The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar

Berner, Christian. La philosophie de Schleiermacher. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1995.Google Scholar

Berner, Christian “Ethische Aspekte der Hermeneutik bei Schleiermacher.” Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie, no. 1, 1992, 68–87.

Bernet, Rudolf, Welton, Donn, and Zavota, Gina (eds.). Edmund Husserl: Critical Assessments. 5 vols. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Bernofsky, Susan. Foreign Words: Translation-Authors in the Age of Goethe. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Jay (ed.). Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics. Various translators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard. “McDowell's Domesticated Hegelianism.” In Smith 2002, 9–24.

Bernstein, RichardBeyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Bohrer, Karl Heinz.Die Kritik der Romantik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar

Borinski, Karl. Baltasar Gracian und die Hoflitteratur in Deutschland. Halle: Max Niemeyer, 1894.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. Tales of the Mighty Dead. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Buchdahl, Gerd. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969.Google Scholar

Bürger, Peter. Zur Kritik der idealistischen Ästhetik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1983.Google Scholar

Cambiano, Giuseppe. Le retour des Anciens. Trans. Milanezi, Silvia. Paris: Éditions Belin, 1994.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Trans. Fritz, C. A. Koelln and Pettegrove, James. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Cassirer, ErnstDie Philosophie der Aufklärung. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1932.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. In Quest of the Ordinary: Lines of Skepticism and Romanticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Christensen, Darrel L. (ed.). Contemporary German Philosophy, vol. I. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul (eds.). Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Conolly, J. M. and Keutner, T. (eds.). Hermeneutics versus Science?Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Dastur, Françoise. “Esthétique et herméneutique. La critique de la conscience esthétique chez Gadamer.”Phénoménologie et esthétique. Ed. Renaud Barbaras et al. Paris: Encre Marine, 1998.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. “Gadamer and Plato's Philebus.” In Hahn 1997, 421–432.

Duve, Thierry. Clement Greenberg between the Lines. Trans. Holmes, Brian. Paris: Éditions Dis Voir, 1996.Google Scholar

Mul, Jos. The Tragedy of Finitude: Dilthey's Hermeneutics of Life. Trans. Burrett, Tony. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Descartes, René.The Philosophical Writings. 2 vols. Trans. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, and Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Descartes, René.Œuvres. Ed. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. Paris: J. Vrin, 1973.Google Scholar

Dilthey, Wilhelm. Die Jugendgeschichte Hegels. Die Jugendgeschichte Hegels und andere Abhandlungen zur Geschichte des Deutschen Idealismus. Ed. Nohl, Herman. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. IV. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1990.Google Scholar

Dilthey, WilhelmLeben Schleiermachers. Erster Band. Ed. Redeker, Martin. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. XIII. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1970.Google Scholar

Dilthey, WilhelmLeben Schleiermachers. Zweiter Band. Ed. Redeker, Martin. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. XIV. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1966.Google Scholar

Dilthey, WilhelmWeltanschauungslehre. Abhandlungen zur Philosophie der Philosophie. Ed. Groethuysen, Bernhard. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 8. Berlin: B. G. Teubner, 1931.Google Scholar

Dostal, Robert J.The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dostal, Robert J. “Gadamer's Continuous Challenge: Heidegger's Plato Interpretation.” In Hahn 1997, 289–307.

Dutt, Carsten. Hermeneutik. Ästhetik. Praktische Philosophie. Hans-Georg Gadamer im Gespräch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1993.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann G.Sämtliche Werke. Ed. Fichte, Immanuel Hermann. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1971.Google Scholar

Fischer, Hermann, et al. Schleiermacher-Archiv, Band I, Teilband 2. Internationaler Schleiermacher-Kongreß 1984. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1985.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael. “Schleiermacher's Hermeneutics: Some Problems and Solutions.” The Harvard Review of Philosophy, spring 2005, 100–123.

Forster, Michael “Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2002 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/schleiermacher/.

Forster, MichaelHegel and Skepticism. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, Manfred. “Metaphysical Foundations: A Look at Schleiermacher's Dialectics.” Trans. Mariña, Jacqueline and Helmer, Christine. In Mariña 2005, 15–34.

Frank, ManfredThe Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism. Trans. Millán-Zaibert, Elizabeth. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Frank, Manfred “Einleitung des Herausgebers,” Friedrich Schleiermacher, Dialektik, ed. Frank, Manfred, vol. I. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2001.Google Scholar

Frank, ManfredUnendliche Annäherung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar

Frank, Manfred “Two Centuries of Philosophical Critique of Reason.” Trans. Freundlieb, D. and Hudson, W.. In Freundlieb and Hudson 1993, 67–85.

Frank, ManfredEinführung in die frühromantische Ästhetik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar

Frank, ManfredWhat is Neostructuralism? Trans. Wilke, Sabine and Gray, Richard. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Frank, ManfredWas ist Neostrukturalismus?Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar

Frank, ManfredDas individuelle Allgemeine. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar

Fränzel, Walter. Geschichte des Übersetzens im 18. Jahrhundert. Leipzig: Voigtländer, 1914.Google Scholar

Frei, Hans W.The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Freundlieb, D. and Hudson, W. (eds.). Reason and its Other. Oxford: Berg, 1993.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger. Chicago: Open Court, 2000.Google Scholar

Fruchon, Pierre. L'Herméneutique de Gadamer. Platonisme et modernité. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1994.Google Scholar

Fulda, Hans-Friedrich and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter (eds.). Hegel und die “Kritik der Urteilskraft.”Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1990.Google Scholar

Funk, Robert W. (ed.). Schleiermacher as Contemporary. Journal for Theology and the Church, vol. VII. New York: Herder & Herder, 1970.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Gadamer on Celan. Ed. and trans. Heinemann, Richard and Krajewski, Bruce. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Reply to David Detmer.” In Hahn 1997, 287.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Gesammelte Werke. Tübingen: J. B. C. Mohr, 1985–1995.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Wer bin Ich und wer bist Du?Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Heidegger's Ways. Trans. Stanley, John W.. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Truth and Method. Trans. Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. New York: Continuum, 1994.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “What is Truth?” Trans. Wachterhauser, Brice R.. In Wachterhauser 1994, 33–46.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Ed. Misgeld, Dieter and Nicholson, Graeme. Trans. Schmidt, Lawrence and Reuss, Monica. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Plato's Dialectical Ethics. Trans. Wallace, Robert M.. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Letter to Dallmayr.” In Palmer and Michelfelder 1989, 93–101.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “On the Circle of Understanding,” Trans. Connolly, J. M. and Keutner, T.. In Connolly and Keutner 1988, 67–78.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Ed. Bernasconi, Robert. Trans. Walker, Nicholas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Philosophical Apprenticeships. Trans. Sullivan, Robert R.. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Wilhelm Dilthey nach 150 Jahren (Zwischen Romantik und Positivismus. Ein Diskussionsbeitrag).” In Orth 1985, 157–182.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Heideggers Wege. Tübingen: J. B. C. Mohr, 1983.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Reason in the Age of Science. Trans. Lawrence, Frederick G.. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Hegels Dialektik. Sechs hermeneutische Studien. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1980.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies of Plato. Trans. and ed. Smith, P. Christopher. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Philosophische Lehrjahre. Eine Rückschau. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Hegel's Dialectics: Five Hermeneutical Studies. Trans. Smith, P. Christopher. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Philosophical Hermeneutics. Trans. David, Linge, E.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Vernunft im Zeitalter der Wissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1976.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “The Problem of Language in Schleiermacher's Hermeneutics.” Trans. Linge, David E.. In Funk 1970, 68–84.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.Volk und Geschichte im Denken Herders. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1942.Google Scholar

Gjesdal, Kristin. “Between Enlightenment and Romanticism: Some Problems and Challenges in Gadamer's Hermeneutics,” TheJournal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 46, no. 2, 2008, 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gjesdal, Kristin “Aesthetic and Political Humanism: Gadamer on Herder, Schleiermacher, and the Origins of Modern Hermeneutics.” History of Philosophy Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 3, July 2007, 275–296.Google Scholar

Gjesdal, Kristin “Reading Shakespeare; Reading Modernity: Hegel and Herder on Art and Modernity.” Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, vol. 9, no. 3, 2004, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gracián, Baltasar. A Pocket Mirror for Heroes. Trans. Maurer, Christopher. New York: Doubleday, 1996.Google Scholar

Gracián, Baltasar. The Art of Worldly Wisdom: A Pocket Oracle. Trans. Maurer, Christopher. New York: Doubleday, 1992.Google Scholar

Gray, John Glenn.Hegel and Greek Thought. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1969.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Clement. The Collected Essays and Criticism. 4 vols. Ed. John O'Brian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Grondin, Jean. Hans-Georg Gadamer: A Biography. Trans. Weinsheimer, Joel. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Grondin, Jean “Gadamer on Humanism.” In Hahn 1997, 157–170.

Grondin, JeanSources of Hermeneutics. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Grondin, JeanHermeneutische Wahrheit?Königstein: Forum Academicum, 1982.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. “Hegel on Kant's Aesthetics: Necessity and Contingency in Beauty and Art.” In Fulda and Horstmann 1990, 81–99.

Habermas, Jürgen.Truth and Justification. Trans. Fultner, Barbara. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “A Review of Truth and Method.” Trans. Dallmayr, Fred R. and McCarthy, Thomas. In Ormiston and Schrift 1990, 213–244.

Habermas, Jürgen. “The Hermeneutic Claim to Universality.” Trans. Bleicher, Joseph. In Ormiston and Schrift, 1990, 245–272.

Habermas, Jürgen.Philosophical-Political Profiles. Trans. Lawrence, Frederick G.. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1982.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.Philosophisch-politische Profile. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar

Hahn, Lewis E. (ed.). The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. The Library of Living Philosophers. Vol. XXIV. Chicago: Open Court, 1997.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.Introduction to the Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Trans. Knox, T. M. and Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.Lectures on the History of Philosophy. 3 vols. Trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, Frances H.. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.Werke in 20 Bänden. Ed. Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.Lectures on the Philosophy of World History: Introduction. Trans. Nisbet, H. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. 2 vols. Trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.Die Vernunft in der Geschichte. Ed. Hoffmeister, Johannes. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1955.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.Einleitung in die Geschichte der Philosophie. Ed. Johannes Hoffmeister. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1940.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1975–.Google Scholar

Heidegger, MartinThe Phenomenology of Religious Life. Trans. Fritsch, Matthias and Gosetti-Ferencei, Jennifer Anna. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Heidegger, MartinPhenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research. Trans. Rojcewicz, Richard. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Heidegger, MartinOntology: The Hermeneutics of Facticity. Trans. Buren, John. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin “Hegel and the Greeks.” Trans. Metcalf, Robert. In Pathmarks. Ed. McNeill, William. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, MartinKant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1991.Google Scholar

Heidegger, MartinNietzsche. Trans. Krell, David F.. San Francisco: Harper, 1991.Google Scholar

Heidegger, MartinKant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Trans. Taft, Richard. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Heidegger, MartinHegel's Concept of Experience. Trans. Gray, John Glenn. New York: Harper & Row, 1989.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin “The Age of the World View.” Trans. Marjorie Grene. Boundary 2, vol. 4, no. 2, winter 1976, 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, MartinPoetry, Language, Thought. Trans. Hofstadter, Albert. San Francisco: Harper, 1975.Google Scholar

Heidegger, MartinBeing and Time. Trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. San Francisco: Harper, 1962.Google Scholar

Heidegger, MartinDer Ursprung des Kunstwerkes. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1960.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter “Fichte's Original Insight.” Trans. Lacherman, David R.. In Christensen 1982, 15–53.

Henrich, DieterFichtes ursprüngliche Einsicht. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1967.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried.Selected Writings on Aesthetics. Ed. and Trans. Moore, Gregory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried.Schriften zur Ästhetik und Literatur 1767–1781, Johann Gottfried Herder. Werke Ed. Gaier, Ulrichet al., vol. II. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

How, Alan. The Habermas–Gadamer Debate and the Nature of the Social. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company, 1995.Google Scholar

Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: The Beacon Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans. Cairns, Dorion. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1988.Google Scholar

Husserl, EdmundCartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, Husserliana I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.Google Scholar

Husserl, EdmundThe Paris Lectures. Trans. Koestenbaum, Peter. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husserl, EdmundErste Philosophie. 2. Teil, Husserliana VIII. Ed. Rudolf Boehm. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1959.Google Scholar

Husserl, EdmundErste Philosophie. 1. Teil, Husserliana VII. Ed. Rudolf Boehm. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1956.Google Scholar

Huyssen, Andreas. Die frühromantische Konzeption von Übersetzung und Aneignung: Studien zur frühromantischen Utopie einer deutschen Weltliteratur. Zurich: Atlantis Verlag, 1969.Google Scholar

Hyppolite, Jean. Genesis and Structure of Hegel's “Phenomenology of Spirit.” Trans. Cherniak, Samuel and Heckman, John. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Hyppolite, JeanGenèse et structure de la Phénoménologie de l'esprit de Hegel. Paris: Aubier, 1946.Google Scholar

Jaeger, Werner. Humanistische Reden und Vorträge. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeschke, Walter. “Paralipomena Hegeliana zur Wirkungsgeschichte Schleiermachers.” In Fischer et al., 1985, 1157–1171.

Jaeschke, Walter “World History and the History of the Absolute Spirit.” In Perkins 1984, 101–117.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. Pluhar, Werner S.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar

Kant, ImmanuelCritique of Pure Reason. Trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. London: Macmillan, 1986.Google Scholar

Kant, ImmanuelWas ist Aufklärung? Aufsätze zur Geschichte und Philosophie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1985.Google Scholar

Kant, ImmanuelOn History. Ed. and trans. Beck, Lewis White. London: Macmillan, 1963.Google Scholar

Kant, ImmanuelGesammelte Schriften. Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1913–42.Google Scholar

Kern, Iso. Husserl und Kant. Eine Untersuchung über Husserls Verhältnis zu Kant und zum Neukantianismus. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964.Google Scholar

Kimmerle, Heinz. “Das Verhältnis Schleiermachers zum transzendentalen Idealismus.” Kant-Studien, vol. 51, nos. 1–4, 1959–60, 410–426.Google Scholar

Kisiel, Theodore. The Genesis of Heidegger's “Being and Time.”Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Kompridis, Nikolas (ed.). Philosophical Romanticisms. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. Heidegger, Language, and World-Disclosure. Trans. Harman, Graham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Lafont, CristinaThe Linguistic Turn in Hermeneutic Philosophy. Trans. José Medina, . Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Larmore, Charles. The Romantic Legacy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Larmore, Charles Macann, Christopher (ed.). Martin Heidegger: Critical Assessments. 4 vols. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A.Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the “Critique of Judgment.”Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A.Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Malpas, Jeff, Arnswald, Ulrich, and Kertscher, Jens (eds.). Gadamer's Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Margolis, Joseph. “Schleiermacher among the Theorists of Language and Interpretation.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, summer 1987, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mariña, Jacqueline (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Schleiermacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRef

Matthews, Gareth B.Thought's Ego in Augustine and Descartes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

McDowell, John. “Response to Rüdiger Bubner.” In Smith 2002, 296–297.

McDowell, JohnMind and World. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Menn, Stephen. Descartes and Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mulhall, Stephen. Inheritance and Originality: Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Mulhall, StephenOn Being in the World: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar

Norton, Robert E.Secret Germany: Stefan George and his Circle. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Norton, Robert E.The Beautiful Soul: Aesthetic Morality in the Eighteenth Century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Norton, Robert E.Herder's Aesthetics and the European Enlightenment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hardenberg, Novalis Friedrich von. “Miscellaneous Remarks (Excerpts).” In J. Bernstein 2003, 203–213.

Hardenberg, Novalis Friedrich vonWerke. Ed. Schulz, Gerhard. Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 1987.Google Scholar

Nowak, Kurt. Schleiermacher. Leben, Werk und Wirkung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2001.Google Scholar

Nowak, KurtSchleiermacher und die Frühromantik. Eine literaturgeschichtliche Studie zum romantischen Religionsverständnis und Menschenbild am Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts in Deutschland. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986.Google Scholar

Ormiston, Gayle L. and Schrift, Alan D. (eds.). The Hermeneutic Tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Orth, Ernst Wolfgang (ed.). Dilthey und die Philosophie der Gegenwart. Freiburg: Karl Alber, 1985.Google Scholar

Oz-Salzberger, Fania. Translating the Enlightenment: Scottish Civic Discourse in Eighteenth-Century Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, Richard E. and Michelfelder, Diane (eds.). Dialogue and Deconstruction. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Pascal, Roy. Shakespeare in Germany 1740–1815. New York: Octagon Books, 1971.Google Scholar

Patsch, Hermann. Alle Menschen sind Künstler. Friedrich Schleiermachers poetische Versuche. Schleiermacher-Archiv, vol. II. Ed. Fischer, H., Birkner, H.-J., Ebeling, G., and Selge, K.-V.. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkins, Robert L. (ed.). History and System: Hegel's Philosophy of History. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Pinkard, Terry. Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert. “Gadamer's Hegel.” In Malpas et al., 2002, 217–238.

Pippin, RobertHegel's Idealism: The Satisfaction of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pöggeler, Otto. “Hegels Kritik der Romantik.”Bonn: Friedrich Wilhelms-Universität, 1956. (Dissertation.)Google Scholar

Pöggeler, Otto and Gethmann-Siefert, Annemarie (eds.). Kunsterfahrung und Kulturpolitik im Berlin Hegels. Hegel-Studien, vol. XXII. Bonn: Bouvier, 1983.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. “Kant and Husserl.” In Bernet et al. 2005, vol. i, 320–344.

Ricoeur, Paul “Schleiermacher's Hermeneutics.” The Monist, vol. 60, no. 2, 1977, 181–197.

Rieger, Reinhold. Interpretation und Wissen. Zur philosophischen Begründung der Hermeneutik bei Friedrich Schleiermacher und ihrem geschichtlichen Hintergrund. Schleiermacher-Archiv, vol. VI. Ed. Fischer, H.Birkner, H.-J., Ebeling, G., Kimmerle, H., and Selge, K.-V.. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rilke, Rainer Maria.New Poems. Ed. and trans. Snow, Edward. New York: North Point Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Rilke, Rainer Maria.Die Gedichte. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar

Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg (ed.). Essays on Descartes' “Meditations.” Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard. Consequences of Pragmatism. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.Google Scholar

Rorty, RichardEssays on Heidegger and Others. Philosophical Papers, vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, RichardContingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, RichardPhilosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, J. B., and Skinner, Quentin (eds.). Philosophy in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheibler, Ingrid. Gadamer: Between Heidegger and Habermas. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich. On the Aesthetic Education of Man. Bilingual edition. Trans. Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. and Willoughby, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. Kritische und theoretische Schriften. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1978.Google Scholar

Schlegel, FriedrichLucinde and the Fragments. Trans. Firchow, Peter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1984–.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichLectures on Philosophical Ethics. Ed. Louden, Robert B.. Trans. Huish, Louise Adey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich “On the Different Methods of Translating.” Trans. Bernofsky, Susan. In Venuti 2002, 43–64.

Schleiermacher, FriedrichHermeneutics and Criticism. Ed. and trans. Bowie, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichDialectic or, the Art of Doing Philosophy: A Study Edition of the 1811 Notes. Ed. and trans. Tice, Terrence. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichHermeneutik und Kritik. Ed. Frank, Manfred. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichChristmas Eve. Trans. Terrence, Tice, N.. San Francisco: EM Texts, 1991.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichEthik (1812/1813) mit späteren Fassungen der Einleitung, Güterlehre und Pflichtenlehre. Ed. Birkner, Hans-Joachim. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1990.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichDialektik. Ed. Odebrecht, Rudolf. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1988.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichOn Religion: Speeches to its Cultured Despisers. Trans. Crouter, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichDialektik (1811). Ed. Arndt, Andreas. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1986.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich “Die allgemeine Hermeneutik” (1809–1810). Ed. Wolfgang Virmond. Schleiermacher-Archiv. Band I, Teilband 2. Ed. H. Fischer, Birkner, H.-J., Ebeling, G., H. Kimmerle, and Selge, K.-V.. Internationaler Schleiermacher-Kongreß 1984. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1985, 1271–1310.

Schleiermacher, FriedrichÄsthetik (1819/25). Über den Begriff der Kunst (1831/32). Ed. Lehnerer, Thomas. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1984.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichHermeneutics: The Handwritten Manuscripts. Ed. Kimmerle, Heinz. Trans. Duke, James and Forstman, Jack. Missoula: Scholars Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichHermeneutik. Nach den Handschriften. Ed. Kimmerle, Heinz. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1974.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichThe Christian Faith. Various translators. New York: Harper & Row, 1963.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichGeschichte der alten Philosophie. Ed. Ritter, Heinrich. Sämtliche Werke, Dritte Abtheilung. Zur Philosophie, zweiten Bandes, erste Abtheilung. Berlin: G. Reimer, 1839.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, FriedrichSämmtliche Werke. Berlin: G. Reimer, 1835–64.Google Scholar

Scholtz, Gunter. Ethik und Hermeneutik. Schleiermachers Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar

Scholtz, GunterDie Philosophie Schleiermachers. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1984.Google Scholar

Scholtz, Gunter “Schleiermachers Theorie der modernen Kultur mit vergleichendem Blick auf Hegel.” In Pöggeler and Gethmann-Siefert 1983, 131–151.

Sedlmayr, Hans. Art in Crisis: The Lost Center. Trans. Battershaw, Brian. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1958.Google Scholar

Sedlmayr, HansVerlust der Mitte. Die bildende Kunst des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts als Symptom und Symbol der Zeit. Salzburg: Otto Müller Verlag, 1951.Google Scholar

Seebohm, Thomas. Hermeneutics: Method and Methodology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar

Selge, Kurt-Victor.Schleiermacher-Archiv. Ed. Fischer, Hermannet al. Band I, Teilband 2, Internationaler Schleiermacher-Kongreß 1984. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1985.Google Scholar

Siep, Ludwig. Hegels Fichtekritik und die Wissenschaftslehre von 1804. Freiburg/Munich: Karl Alber Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar

Smith, Nicholas H. (ed.). Reading McDowell: On “Mind and World.”London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Stadler, Ingrid. “The Idea of Art and of its Criticism: A Rational Reconstruction of a Kantian Doctrine.” In Cohen and Guyer 1982, 195–218.

Stern, Robert. Hegel and the “Phenomenology of Spirit”. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Stewart, John. “Schleiermacher's Visit to Copenhagen in 1833.” Zeitschrift für neuere Theologiegeschichte, vol. 11, no. 2, 2004, 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szondi, Peter. Celan-Studies. Trans. Bernofsky, Susan. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Szondi, PeterOn Textual Understanding and Other Essays. Trans. Mendelsohn, Harvey. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Szondi, PeterCelan-Studien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar

Szondi, Peter “L'herméneutique de Schleiermacher.” Trans. Buguet, S.. Poétique 2, 1970, 141–155.

Taminiaux, Jacques. Poetics, Speculation, and Judgment. Ed. and Trans. Gendre, Michael. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Taminiaux, Jacques. Heidegger and the Project of Fundamental Ontology. Ed. and trans. Gendre, Michael. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Taminiaux, JacquesLectures de l'ontologie fondamentale. Essais sur Heidegger. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon, 1989.Google Scholar

Tatarkiewicz, Wladyslaw. A History of Six Ideas: An Essay in Aesthetics. Trans. Kasparek, Christopher. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Charles. “Gadamer on the Human Sciences.” In Dostal 2002, 126–142.

Taylor, CharlesSources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Tugendhat, Ernst. “Heidegger's Idea of Truth.” Trans. Macann, Christopher. In Macann 1992, vol. III, 79–92.

Tugendhat, ErnstPhilosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar

Vasari, Giorgio. The Lives of the Painters, Sculptors and Architects. 2 vols. Ed. Gaunt, William. Trans. Hinds, A. B.. London: Dent & Sons, 1963.Google Scholar

Vattimo, Gianni. “Hermeneutics and Nihilism: An Apology for Aesthetic Consciousness.” In Wachterhauser 1986, 446–459.

Venuti, Lawrence (ed.). The Translation Studies Reader. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Venuti, LawrenceThe Translator's Invisibility: A History of Translation. London: Routledge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Virmond, Wolfgang. “Neue Textgrundlagen zu Schleiermachers früher Hermeneutik. Prolegomena zur kritischen Edition.” In Selge 1985, 575–590.

Wach, Joachim. Das Verstehen. Grundzüge einer Geschichte der hermeneutischen Theorie im 19. Jahrhundert. 3 vols. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1926–1933.Google Scholar

Wachterhauser, Brice R.Beyond Being. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Wachterhauser, Brice R. (ed.). Hermeneutics and Truth. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Wachterhauser, Brice R. (ed.). Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Weinsheimer, Joel C.Gadamer's Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Wilhelmy, Petra. Der Berliner Salon im 19. Jahrhundert (1780–1914). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Bernard. Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. London: Penguin, 1978.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen. Hegel's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Zammito, John. The Genesis of Kant's “Critique of Judgment.”Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Ziolkowski, Theodore. Clio the Romantic Muse: Historicizing the Faculties in Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004.Google Scholar