Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- About the contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introducing Genetic Suspects
- Section 1 Key areas in DNA profiling and databasing
- 2 Key issues in DNA profiling and databasing: implications for governance
- 3 Forensic utilization of voluntarily collected DNA samples: law enforcement versus human rights
- 4 Base assumptions? Racial aspects of US DNA forensics
- 5 Health and wealth, law and order: banking DNA against disease and crime
- 6 DNA profiling versus fingerprint evidence: more of the same?
- Section 2 National contexts of forensic DNA technologies and key issues
- Section 3 Conclusions
- Index
- References
4 - Base assumptions? Racial aspects of US DNA forensics
from Section 1 - Key areas in DNA profiling and databasing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- About the contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introducing Genetic Suspects
- Section 1 Key areas in DNA profiling and databasing
- 2 Key issues in DNA profiling and databasing: implications for governance
- 3 Forensic utilization of voluntarily collected DNA samples: law enforcement versus human rights
- 4 Base assumptions? Racial aspects of US DNA forensics
- 5 Health and wealth, law and order: banking DNA against disease and crime
- 6 DNA profiling versus fingerprint evidence: more of the same?
- Section 2 National contexts of forensic DNA technologies and key issues
- Section 3 Conclusions
- Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION
After two decades of acceptance in US courtrooms, forensic DNA analysis remains plagued with flaws even as its use burgeons. Instead of fomenting a dialogue with the public, US lawmakers have invoked the spectre of violent crime to promulgate the passage of legislation that permits the coercion of DNA samples from ever-expanding segments of society. This leaves US citizens, who prize both privacy and security, to confront momentous policy decisions without the benefit of comprehensive public education or debate.
This chapter largely focuses on events that encapsulate many of these issues, albeit in microcosm: the US conduct of DNA sweeps. Also called DNA dragnets or DNA mass screenings, this method is a species of ‘cold hit’ in which law enforcement essays to match DNA left by an unknown miscreant with the person who left it by obtaining samples from members of the community thought to contain the criminal. The discussion will explore how, via the use of DNA sweeps, local police exploit laws in order to expand the scope of DNA profiling, collection and storage to allow the apprehension of unknown miscreants on the strength of non-specific physical descriptors. However, the ethnically heterogeneous nature of US society and the overwhelming racial disparities in arrest and incarceration present challenges that have been largely ignored.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Genetic SuspectsGlobal Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing, pp. 63 - 84Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
(ed.), , and (2000). Without Sanctuary: Lynching Photography in America. Sante Fe, NM: Twin Palms.Google Scholar
(2004). Threat and Humiliation: Racial Profiling, Domestic Security, and Human Rights in the United States. Ridgefield Park, NJ: US Domestic Human Rights Program.Google Scholar
. (1993). Court invalidates a decade of blood tests results in criminal casesNew York Times, 12 November, 20A.Google Scholar
and (2007). Police report far more stops and searches. New York Times, 3 February, 1A.Google Scholar
, and (1996). Mean genes and the biology of aggression: a critical review of recent animal and human research. Journal of Neurogenetics, 11, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001). How we got to two million: How did the land of the free become the world's leading jailer?Mother Jones, 10 July, 2.Google Scholar
(1996). The Foulston & Siefkin lecture: racial libel as American ritual. Washburn Law Journal, 36, 1–7.Google Scholar
(1977). Genetic screening programs and public policy. Phylon, 38: 117–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1990). Genetic Variation and Disorders in People of African Origin. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2007). The influence of race on face identification. In Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology, Vol. 2, ed. . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 257–282.Google Scholar
(2005). Arresting DNA: privacy expectations of free citizens versus post-convicted persons and the unconstitutionality of DNA dragnets. Minnesota Law Review, 89, 1842–1874.Google Scholar
, and (1990). The prevalence of illicit-drug or alcohol use during pregnancy and discrepancies in mandatory reporting in Pinellas County, Florida. New England Journal of Medicine, 322, 1202–1206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1999). Effects of dl-fenfluramine on aggressive and impulsive responding in adult males with a history of conduct disorder. Psychopharmacology, 146, 473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). Forensic genetics and ethical, legal and social implications beyond the clinic. Nature Genetics 36, 11(Suppl 36), S8–S12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007). CSI and its effects: media, juries, and the burden of proof. New England Law Review, 41, 435–470Google Scholar
(2006). Explaining differential trust of DNA forensic technology: grounded assessment or inexplicable paranoia?Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 34, 293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2007). Student note: searching for a needle in a haystack – the constitutionality of police DNA dragnets, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 495–497.Google Scholar
(2005). Baffled police try DNA sweep: towns men asked to give samples in murder case, Washington Post, 12 January, A03.Google Scholar
(2004). DNA dragnet makes Charlottesville uneasy: race profiling suspected in hunt for rapist. Washington Post, 14 April, A01.Google Scholar
(2005). Racial profiling and the pretextual traffic atop: a critical look at the US Supreme Court's Whren decision. In Proceedings of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, 12 August.Google Scholar
(2002). The blooding of America: privacy and the DNA dragnet. Cardozo Law Review, 23: 2277.Google ScholarPubMed
(1998). Even the Rat Was White: A Historical View of Psychology, 2nd edn. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
(1999a). Driving While Black: Racial Profiling on our Nation's Highways. [American Civil Liberties Union Special Report.] New York: American Civil Liberties Unionwww.aclu.org/racialjustice/racialprofiling/15912pub19990607.html (accessed August 2009).Google Scholar
(1999b). The stories, the statistics, and the law: why driving while black matters. Minnesota Law Review, 84, 265–326.Google Scholar
(2009). N.J. bill would put state in charge of monitoring troopers. Philadelphia Inquirer, July 2, B1.Google Scholar
(1992). Federal official apologizes for remarks on inner cities. New York Times, 22 February, 6.Google Scholar
(2008). Targeting blacks: drug law enforcement and race in the United States. Washington, DC: United Nations Foundation http://www.hrw.org/en/node/62236/section/1 (accessed August 2009).
(2009). Website. www.innocenceproject.org/ (accessed 8 January 2009)
and , (1934). The investigation of racial differences prior to 1910. Journal of Negro Education, 3, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). How a drug becomes ethnic: law, commerce, and the production of racial categories in medicine. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics 4, 1–46.Google Scholar
(1972). Experimentation with Human Beings: The Authority of the Investigator, Subject, Professions, and State in the Human Experimentation Process. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
and (2007). Troubling cases surface in report on HPD crime lab. Houston Chronicle, 17 June, 1.Google Scholar
(1992). Struggle continues over remarks by mental health official. New York Times, 8 March, 34.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2008). Drug arrests and DNA: building Jim Crow's database. GeneWatch, 21, 9–11.Google Scholar
(1911). Crime, Its Causes and Remedies. [Trans. .] Boston, MA: Little, Brown, pp. 428, 447–448.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2001). Inferring ethnic origin by means of an STR profile. Forensic Science International, 119, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2008). DNA sampling: privacy and police investigation in a suspect society. Arkansas Law Review, 61, 53–58.Google Scholar
(2008). Contrasts and comparisons: three practices of forensic investigation. Comparative Sociology, 7, 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Black, Latino drivers fare worse in traffic stops. MSNBC.COM, April 29, http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:rhY_WIURuo4J:www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18383182/+MSNBC+driving+while+black+2007&-cd=1 &hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a (accessed 5 March 2010).
(2006). Ethnic profiling in the Moscow metro. New York: Open Society Institute http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/focus/equality_citizenship/articles_publications/publications/profiling_20060613 (accessed 15 March 2010).
(2008). Scotland Yard criminologist: DNA-print troublemaker kids Give me the child, I'll lock-up the man. London Observer, 17 March, 1.Google Scholar
(2000). DNA databases: when fear goes too far. American Criminal Law Review, 37, 1219–1230.Google ScholarPubMed
(1998). A crime sniffing network. Wired News, 11 August www.wired.com/news/technology/0,282,14231,00.html (accessed July 2002).
(2006). DNA of 37% of black men held by police: Home Office denies racial bias. Guardian, 7 January www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/jan/05/race.ukcrime (accessed August 2009).
(1997). Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction and the Meaning of Liberty. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
and (1993). In the Matter of an Investigation of the West Virginia State Police Crime Laboratory, Serology Division (Report No.21973) In the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.
(2001). They all look alike: the inaccuracy of cross-racial identifications. American Journal of Criminal Law, 28, 207–228.Google Scholar
(2007). Rapid DNA database expansion and disparate minority impact. GeneWatch 20, 3–11.
and (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. Crime and Justice, 21, 311- 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2009). Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. [Paper No. GE3LS, W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics.]Social Science Medicine, 68, 781–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). Disposable children in black faces: the violence initiative as inner-city containment policy. University of Missouri Kansas Law Review, 62, 423–428.Google Scholar
and (2006). California's Proposition 69: a dangerous precedent for criminal DNA databases. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 34, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2007). DNA technology as an effective tool in reducing crime. Forensic Magazine, October/November www.forensicmag.com/articles.asp?pid=168 (accessed August 2009).
(2004). DNA technology advancing to produce more information faster for police. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 12 December, A3.Google Scholar
and (2003). Black women's health in custody. In National Colloquium on Black Womens' Health. Washington, DC: Black Womens' Health Imperative, pp. 97–108.Google Scholar
(2007). Cash ties that bind: possible violation of city bidding rules for DNA lab linked to Safir. New York Daily News, 20 August www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/08/20/2007–08-20_cash_ties_that_bind-2.html (accessed August 2009).
(2006). A Chip-Based Genetic Detector for Rapid Identification of Individuals. [Document No. 213911.] Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
and (2007). Mix-up on DNA deals HPD lab another blow: man exonerated 14 years after rape conviction. Houston Chronicle, 4 October, 1.Google Scholar
(2004). Police DNA Sweeps Extremely Unproductive: A National Survey of Police DNA Sweeps. Omaha, NE: University of Nebraska Police Professionalism Initiative, Department of Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
(2004). Born for evil? Stereotyping the karyotype: a case history in the genetics of aggression. In Twentieth Century Ethics of Human Subjects Research: Historical Perspectives on Values, Practices and Regulations, eds. and . Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, pp. 319–334.Google Scholar
(2007). Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Philip, A. Ward v. George Trent (1999). Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia at Huntington 9No. 98–7267). Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-97–1107) Decided April 23, 1999.
State v. Soto (1996) 734 A.2d 350 N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div.
- 2
- Cited by