Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T01:38:00.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - European governments and the development of the international legal framework on genocide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Karen E. Smith
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

This chapter analyses the role of European governments in the origins and development of the international legal and normative framework on preventing and punishing genocide. It cannot be said that European governments were among those leading the international community towards agreement on the Genocide Convention: smaller countries and the USA and Australia arguably played much more leading roles in this respect. And perhaps surprisingly, while some West European countries readily accepted the Genocide Convention, others were much more critical: several West European states were not among those countries that first signed, ratified or acceded to the Convention, and some took over twenty years to accede to it. Eventually European governments ‘came round’ to the legal norm, and have since espoused a stronger response to genocide.

European states and the drafting of the Genocide Convention

During the process of drafting the Convention, there was by no means a common viewpoint shared by the various European countries present. In fact, from the start of the negotiating process, two countries were generally hostile to the Convention: the United Kingdom and the USSR. Both had voted for the Genocide Resolution, but neither were enthusiastic about the idea of an international convention. The USSR's stance will not be discussed at length here, as this book is focused principally on the positions of France, Germany and the UK.

The UK's hostility was evident right from the start of the drafting process. Its opposition was based on several grounds, not all of them coherent with each other.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×