Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T18:30:53.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

40 - Ob-Gyn and the Law

from Section 6 - General Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

Lisa Keder
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Martin E. Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Gynecologic Care , pp. 389 - 393
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACOG. Coping with the stress of medical professional liability litigation. Washington, DC. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 551. 2013.Google Scholar
Jena, AB, Chandra, A, Lakdawalla, D, Seabury, S.. Outcomes of medical malpractice litigation against US physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(11):892894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG. From exam room to courtroom: navigating litigation and coping with stress. ACOG. Washington, DC. 2006.Google Scholar
ACOG. Healing our own: adverse events in obstetrics and gynecology. ACOG. Washington, DC. 2012Google Scholar
ACOG. Survey of professional liability. Washington, DC. 2006Google Scholar
James, JM, Davis, WE. Physicians Survival Guide to Litigation Stress: Understanding, Managing, and Transcending a Malpractice Crisis. Lafayette, CA: Physician Health Publications. 2006.Google Scholar
Fineberg, KS, Peters, JD, Willson, JR, Kroll, DA. Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Law. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Health Administration Press. 1984.Google Scholar
Berry, DB. The physician’s guide to medical malpractice. Bumc Proceedings 2001;14:109112.Google ScholarPubMed
Green, VL, Sara, D.. Introduction of contextual legal issues in an interdisciplinary program for the study of ethical dilemmas in obstetrics and gynecology for third-year medical students. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep 187(3 Suppl):S44–S48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Medical Association Survey. 2010.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×