Torloni, MR, Vadmedorska, N, Merialdi, M, et al. Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 599–608.Google Scholar

Chenn, MM, Coakley, FV, Kaimal, A, et al. Guidelines for computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 333–40.Google Scholar

Streffer, C, Shore, R, Konermann, G, et al. Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 2003; 33: 5–206.Google Scholar

Karam, PA. Determining and reporting fatal radiation exposure from diagnostic radiation. Health Phys 2000; 79 (Suppl 5): 585–90.Google Scholar

Cappell, MS, Colon, VJ, Sidhom, OA. A study of 10 medical centres of the safety and efficacy of 48 flexible sigmoidoscopies and 8 colonoscopies during pregnancy with follow-up of fetal outcome and with comparison to control groups. Dig Dis Sci 1996; 41: 2353–61.Google Scholar

Pearl, J, Price, R, Richardson, W, Fanelli, R. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3479–92.Google Scholar

Reedy, MB, Galan, HL, Richards, WE, et al. Laparoscopy during pregnancy: a survey of laparoendoscopic surgeons. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 33–8.Google Scholar

Oelsner, G, Stockheim, D, Soriano, D, et al. Pregnancy outcome after laparoscopy or laparotomy in pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003; 10: 200–4.Google Scholar

Rollins, MD, Chan, KJ, Price, RR. Laparoscopy for appendicitis and cholelithiasis during pregnancy: a new standard of care. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 237–41.Google Scholar

Wang, CJ, Yen, CF, Lee, CL, Soong, YK. Minilaparoscopic cystectomy and appendectomy in late second trimester. JSLS 2002; 6: 373–5.Google Scholar

McKellar, DP, Anderson, CT, Boynton, CJ, Peoples, JB. Cholecystectomy during pregnancy without fetal loss. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 174: 465–8.Google Scholar

Casele, HL. The use of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparins in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 895–905.Google Scholar

Lachman, E, Schienfield, A, Voss, E, et al. Pregnancy and laparoscopic surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1999; 6: 347–51.Google Scholar

Fatum, M, Rojanshy, N. Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2001; 56: 50–9.Google Scholar

Fardiazar, Z, Derakhshan, I, Torab, R, Vahedi, A, Goldust, M. Maternal-neonatal outcome in pregnancies with non-obstetric laparotomy during pregnancy. Pak J Biol Sci 2014; 17: 260–5.Google Scholar

Kumar, A, Pearl, M. Mini-laparotomy versus laparoscopy for gynecologic conditions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 109–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jensen, JG. Uterine torsion in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992; 71: 260–5.Google Scholar

Salani, R, Theiler, RN, Lindsay, M. Uterine torsion and fetal bradycardia associated with external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 820–2.Google Scholar

Setchell, M. Abdominal pain in pregnancy. In Studd, J (ed.), Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 6. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1987, pp. 89–99.Google Scholar

Yoneyama, K, Kimura, A, Kogo, M, et al. Clinical predictive factors for preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labour or preterm premature ruptured membranes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49: 16–21.Google Scholar

Andrews, CM, O’Neill, LM. Use of pelvic tilt exercise for ligament pain relief. J Nurse Midwifery 1994; 39: 370–4.Google Scholar

Dowswell, T, Neilson, JP. Interventions for heartburn in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (4): CD007065.Google Scholar

Gill, SK, O’Brien, L, Koren, G. The safety of histamine 2 (H2) blockers in pregnancy: A meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 1835–8.Google Scholar

Ford, F. Constipation in pregnancy. Pract Midwife 2008; 11: 28–31.Google ScholarPubMed

Trash, HK, Friede, A, Hogue, CJ. Abdominal pregnancy in the United States: frequency and maternal mortality. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 333–6.Google Scholar

Aliyu, LD, Ashimi, AO. A multicenter study of advanced abdominal pregnancy: a review of six cases in low resource settings. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170: 33–8.Google Scholar

Nkusu Nunyalulendho, D, Einterz, EM. Advanced abdominal pregnancy: case report and review of 163 cases reported since 1946. Rural Remote Health 2008; 8: 1087–90.Google Scholar

Worley, KC, Hnat, MD, Cunningham, FG. Advanced extrauterine pregnancy: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 297–9.Google Scholar

Huang, K, Song, L, Wang, L, et al. Advanced abdominal pregnancy: an increasingly challenging clinical concern for obstetricians. Int J Clin Pathol 2014; 7: 5461–72.Google ScholarPubMed

Sunday-Adeoye, I, Twoney, D, Egwuatu, EV, Okonta, PI. A 30 year review of advanced abdominal pregnancy at the Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Afikpo, south eastern Nigeria (1976–2006). Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283: 19–24.Google Scholar

Cetinkaya, MB, Kokcu, A, Alper, T. Follow up of the regression of the placenta left in situ in an advanced abdominal pregnancy using the Cavaleiri method. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2005; 31: 22–6.Google Scholar

Anderson, B, Nielson, TF. Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 78: 758–62.Google Scholar

Andersson, RE, Lambe, M. Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30: 1281–5.Google Scholar

Wei, PL, Keller, JJ, Liang, HH, Lin, HC. Acute appendicitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide population-based study. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 1204–11.Google Scholar

Tracey, M, Fletcher, HS. Appendicitis in pregnancy. Am Surg 2000; 66: 555–9.Google ScholarPubMed

Lehnert, BE, Gross, JA, Linnau, KF, Moshiri, M. Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emerg Radiol 2012; 19: 293–9.Google Scholar

Israel, GM, Malguria, N, McCarthy, S, Copel, J, Weinreb, J. MRI vs. ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 428–33.Google Scholar

Coursey, CA, Nelson, RC, Patel, MB. Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 2009; 254: 460–8.Google Scholar

Basaran, A, Basaran, M. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009; 64: 481–8.Google Scholar

Pedrosa, I, Lafornara, M, Pandharipande, PV, et al. Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology 2009; 250: 749–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Corneille, MG, Gallup, TM, Bening, T, et al. The use of laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy: evaluation of safety and efficacy. Am J Surg 2010; 200: 363–7.Google Scholar

Zhang Y, , Zhao, YY, Qiao, J, Ye, RH. Diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy and perinatal outcome in the late pregnancy. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009; 122: 521–4.Google ScholarPubMed

Eom, JM, Hong, JH, Jeon, SW, et al. Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Pregnant Women with Acute Appendicitis. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2012; 41: 82–6.Google Scholar

Chung, JC, Cho, GS, Shin, EJ, Kim, HC, Song, OP. Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in pregnant women. Can J Surg 2013; 56: 341–6.Google Scholar

Walker, HG, Samaraee, AA, Mills, SJ, Kalbassi, MR. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review of the published evidence. Int J Surg 2014; 12: 1235–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jackson, H, Granger, S, Price, R, et al. Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of surgical diseases during pregnancy: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1917–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Walsh, CA1, Tang, T, Walsh, SR. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review. Int J Surg 2008; 6: 339–44.Google Scholar

Meyerson, S, Holtz, T, Ehringreis, M, et al. Small bowel obstruction in pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 299–302.Google Scholar

Rawlings, C. Management of postcaesarian Ogilvie’s syndrome and their subsequent outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 50: 573–81.Google Scholar

Ko, CW, Beresford, SA, Schulte, SJ, Matsumoto, AM. Incidence, natural history, and risk factors for biliary sludge and stones during pregnancy. Hepatology 2005; 41: 359.Google Scholar

Ko, CW. Risk factors for gallstone-related hospitalization during pregnancy and the postpartum. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2263–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sang, SJ, Mayo, ML, Rodriguez-Frias, E, et al. Safety and utility of ERCP during pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:453–61.Google Scholar

Othman, MO, Stone, E, Hashimi, M, Parasher, G. Conservative management of cholelithiasis and its complications in pregnancy is associated with recurrent symptoms and more emergency department visits. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 564–9.Google Scholar

Sun, Y, Fan, C, Wang, S. Clinical analysis of 16 patients with acute pancreatitisin the third trimester of pregnancy Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2013; 6: 1696–701.Google Scholar

Kayatas, SE, Eser, M, Cam, C, Cogendez, E, Guzin, K. Acute pancreatitis associated with hypertriglyceridemia: a life-threatening complication. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 281: 427–9.Google Scholar

Wang, SS, Lin, XZ, Tsai, YT, et al. Clinical significance of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and biochemical testsin the rapid diagnosis of gallstone-related pancreatitis: a prospective study. Pancreas 1988; 3: 153–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tang, SJ, Mayo, MJ, Rodriguez-Frias, E, et al. Safety and utility of ERCP during pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 453–61.Google Scholar

Hernandez, A, Petrov, MS, Brooks, DC, et al. Acute pancreatitis and pregnancy: a 10-year single center experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11: 1623–7.Google Scholar

Date, RS, Kaushal, M, Ramesh, A. A review of the management of gallstone disease and its complications in pregnancy. Am J Surg 2008; 196: 599–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crisan, LS, Steidl, ET, Rivera-Alsina, ME. Acute hyperlipidemic pancreatitis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: e9.Google Scholar

Eddy, JJ, Gideonsen, MD, Song, JY, et al. Pancreatitis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 1075–81.Google Scholar

Pandey, R, Jacob, A, Brooks, H. Acute pancreatitis in pregnancy: review of three cases and anaesthetic management. Int J Obstet Anesth 2012; 21: 360–79.Google Scholar

McClave, SA. Nutrition support in acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2007; 36:65–74.Google Scholar

Smithson, A, Ruiz, J, Perello, R, et al. Diagnostic and management of spontaneous rectus sheath hematoma. Eur J Intern Med 2013; 24: 579–82.Google Scholar

Kasotakis, G. Retroperitoneal and rectus sheath hematomas. Surg Clin North Am 2014; 94: 71–6.Google Scholar

Chapelle, CF, Schutte, JM, Schuitemaker, NW, Steegers, EAP, van Roosmalen, J. Maternal mortality attributable to vascular dissection and rupture in the Netherlands: a nationwide confidential enquiry BJOG 2012; 119: 86–93.Google Scholar

Aubrey-Bassler, FK, Sowers, N. 613 cases of splenic rupture without risk factors or previously diagnosed disease: a systematic review. BMC Emerg Med 2012; 12: 11.Google Scholar

Baker, PN, Madeley, RJ, Symonds, EM. Abdominal pain of unknown aetiology in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 688–91.Google Scholar

Glanc, P, Brofman, N, Salem, S, et al. The prevalence of incidental simple ovarian cysts ≥ 3 cm detected by transvaginal sonography in early pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007; 29: 502–6.Google Scholar

Sergent, F, Verspyck, E, Marpeau, L. [Management of an ovarian cyst during pregnancy]. Presse Med 2003; 32: 1039–45.Google Scholar

Zanetta, G, Mariani, E, Lissoni, A, et al. A prospective study of the role of ultrasound in the management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. BJOG 2003; 110: 578–83.Google Scholar

Perkins, KY, Johnson, JL, Kay, HH. Simple ovarian cysts: clinical features on a first-trimester ultrasound scan. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 440–4.Google Scholar

Goffinet, F. [Ovarian cysts and pregnancy]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2001; 30 (1 Suppl): S100–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Yen, CF, Lin, SL, Murk, W, et al. Risk analysis of torsion and malignancy for adnexal masses during pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 1895–902.Google Scholar

Szecsi, PB, Andersen, MR, Bjørngaard, B, Hedengran, KK, Stender, S. Cancer antigen 125 after delivery in women with a normal pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93: 1295–301.Google Scholar

Derchi, LE, Serafini, G, Gandolfo, N, Gandolfo, NG, Martinoli, C. Ultrasound in gynecology. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 2137–55.Google Scholar

Sherard, GB, Hodson, CA, Williams, HJ, et al. Adnexal masses and pregnancy: a 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 358–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Usui, R, Minakami, H, Kosuge, S, et al. A retrospective survey of clinical, pathologic, and prognostic features of adnexal masses operated on during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2000; 26: 89–93.Google Scholar

Hill, LM, Connors-Beatty, DJ, Nowak, A, Tush, B. The role of ultrasonography in the detection and management of adnexal masses during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 703–7.Google Scholar

Cohen, SB, Oelsner, G, Seidman, DS, et al. Laparoscopic detorsion allows sparing of the twisted ischemic adnexa. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1999; 6: 139–43.Google Scholar

Yuen, PM, Chang, AM. Laparoscopic management of adnexal mass during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 173–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Balci, O, Gezginc, K, Karatayli, R, et al. Management and outcomes of adnexal masses during pregnancy: a 6-year experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008; 34: 524–8.Google Scholar

Caspi, B, Ben-Arie, A, Appelman, Z, Or, Y, Hagay, Z. Aspiration of simple pelvic cysts during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2000; 49: 102–5.Google Scholar

Glanc, P, Salem, S, Farine, D. Adnexal masses in the pregnant patient: a diagnostic and management challenge. Ultrasound Q 2008; 24: 225–40.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, H, Yoshida, A, Kobayashi, M, Yamada, T. Changes in size of the functional cyst on ultrasonography during early pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 1997; 14: 1–4.Google Scholar

Rice, JP, Kay, HH, Mahony, BS. The clinical significance of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1212–16.Google Scholar

Strobelt, N, Ghidini, A, Cavallone, M, et al. Natural history of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13: 399–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Laughlin, SK, Baird, DD, Savitz, DA, Herring, AH, Hartmann, KE. Prevalence of uterine leiomyomas in the first trimester of pregnancy: an ultrasound-screening study. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 630–5.Google Scholar

Qidwai, GI, Caughey, AB, Jacoby, AF. Obstetric outcomes in women with sonographically identified uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 376–82.Google Scholar

Winer-Muram, HT, Muram, D, Gillieson, MS. Uterine myomas in pregnancy. J Can Assoc Radiol 1984; 35: 168–70.Google Scholar

Rosati, P, Exacoustos, C, Mancuso, S. Longitudinal evaluation of uterine myoma growth during pregnancy. A sonographic study. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 511–15.Google Scholar

Aharoni, A, Reiter, A, Golan, D, Paltiely, Y, Sharf, M. Patterns of growth of uterine leiomyomas during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 510–13.Google Scholar

Klatsky, PC, Tran, ND, Caughey, AB, Fujimoto, VY. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 357–66.Google Scholar

Lam, SJ, Best, S, Kumar, S. The impact of fibroid characteristics on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 395.e1–5.Google Scholar

Coronado, GD, Marshall, LM, Schwartz, SM. Complications in pregnancy, labor, and delivery with uterine leiomyomas: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 764–9.Google Scholar

Exacoustos, C, Rosati, P. Ultrasound diagnosis of uterine myomas and complications in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 97–101.Google Scholar

Vergani, P, Ghidini, A, Strobelt, N, et al. Do uterine leiomyomas influence pregnancy outcome? Am J Perinatol 1994; 11: 356–8.Google Scholar

Pritts, EA, Parker, WH, Olive, DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 1215–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carranza-Mamane, B, Havelock, J, Hemmings, R, et al. The management of uterine fibroids in women with otherwise unexplained infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2015; 37: 277–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chittawar, PW, Franik, S, Pouwer, AW, Farquhar, C. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (10): CD004638.Google Scholar

Roberts, WE, Fulp, KS, Morrison, JC, Martin, JN. The impact of leiomyomas on pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 39: 43–7.Google Scholar

Narayan, R, Rajat, , Goswamy, K. Treatment of submucous fibroids, and outcome of assisted conception. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994; 1: 307–11.Google Scholar

Koike, T, Minakami, H, Kosuge, S, et al. Uterine leiomyoma in pregnancy: its influence on obstetric performance. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1999; 25: 309–13.Google Scholar

Celik, C, Acar, A, Ciçek, N, Gezginc, K, Akyürek, C. Can myomectomy be performed during pregnancy? Gynecol Obstet Invest 2002; 53: 79–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bonito, M, Gulemì, L, Basili, R, Roselli, D. Myomectomy during the first and second trimester of pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2007; 34: 149–50.Google Scholar

De Carolis, S, Fatigante, G, Ferrazzani, S, et al. Uterine myomectomy in pregnant women. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001; 16: 116–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wittich, AC, Salminen, ER, Yancey, MK, Markenson, GR. Myomectomy during early pregnancy. Mil Med 2000; 165: 162–4.Google Scholar

Mollica, G, Pittini, L, Minganti, E, Perri, G, Pansini, F. Elective uterine myomectomy in pregnant women. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1996; 23: 168–72.Google ScholarPubMed

Phelan, JP. Myomas and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995; 22: 801–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, CE. Myomectomy: comparison of open and laparoscopic techniques. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 407–20.Google Scholar

Georgakopoulos, PA, Bersis, G. Sigmoido-uterine rupture in pregnancy after multiple myomectomy. Int Surg 1981; 66: 367–8.Google Scholar

Brown, AB, Chamberlain, R, Te Linde, RW. Myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1956; 71: 759–63.Google Scholar

Nezhat, C. The “cons” of laparoscopic myomectomy in women who may reproduce in the future. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1996; 41: 280–3.Google Scholar

Matsunaga, JS, Daly, CB, Bochner, CJ, Agnew, CL. Repair of uterine dehiscence with continuation of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 1211–12.Google Scholar

Dubuisso, JB, Fauconnier, A, Babaki-Fard, K, Chapron, C. Laparoscopic myomectomy: a current view. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6: 588–94.Google Scholar

Tian, YC, Long, TF, Dai, YM. Pregnancy outcomes following different surgical approaches of myomectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41: 350–7.Google Scholar

Al-Serehi, A, Mhoyan, A, Brown, M, et al. Placenta accreta: an association with fibroids and Asherman syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 1623–8.Google Scholar

Boivin, J, Bunting, L, Collins, JA, Nygren, KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1506–12.Google Scholar

Dupas, C, Christin-Maitre, S. [What are the factors affecting fertility in 2008?] Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2008; 69 (Suppl 1): S57–61.Google Scholar

Snick, HK, Snick, TS, Evers, JL, Collins, JA. The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: the Walcheren primary care study. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1582–8.Google Scholar

Evers, JL. Female subfertility. Lancet 2002; 360: 151–9.Google Scholar

Grigorescu, V, Zhang, Y, Kissin, DM, et al. Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology by infertility diagnosis: ovulatory dysfunction versus tubal obstruction. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 1019–25.Google Scholar

Pandey, S, Shetty, A, Hamilton, M, Bhattacharya, S, Maheshwari, A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18: 485–503.Google Scholar

Ziadeh, SM, Zakaria, MR, Abu-Hieja, A. Pregnancy rates using CC/hMG or hMG alone. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1997; 23: 97–101.Google Scholar

Elchalal, U, Schenker, JG. The pathophysiology of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: views and ideas. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1129–37.Google Scholar

Delvigne, A, Rozenberg, S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod Update 2002; 8: 559–77.Google Scholar

Schieve, LA, Tatham, L, Peterson, HB, Toner, J, Jeng, G. Spontaneous abortion among pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 959–67.Google Scholar

Devroey, P, Van Steirteghem, A. A review of ten years experience of ICSI. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10: 19–28.Google Scholar

Clayton, HB, Schieve, LA, Peterson, HB, et al. Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 595–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Perkins, KM, Boulet, SL, Kissin, DM, Jamieson, DJ; National ART Surveillance (NASS) Group. Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001–2011. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 70–8.Google Scholar

Adamson, GD, de Mouzon, J, Lancaster, P, et al. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 2000. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 1586–622.Google Scholar

de Mouzon, J, Goossens, V, Bhattacharya, S, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 1851–62.Google Scholar

Qin, J, Wang, H, Sheng, X, et al. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril 2015; 103: 1492–508.e1–7.Google Scholar

Gunby, J, Bissonnette, F, Librach, C, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 2189–201.Google Scholar

van Peperstraten, AM, Hermens, RP, Nelen, WL, et al. Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2718–23.Google Scholar

Allen, C, Bowdin, S, Harrison, RF, et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after assisted reproduction: a comparative study. Ir J Med Sci 2008; 177: 233–41.Google Scholar

Jackson, RA, Gibson, KA, Wu, YW, Croughan, MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 551–63.Google Scholar

Caserta, D, Marci, R, Tatone, C, et al. IVF pregnancies: neonatal outcomes after the new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (law 40/2004). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87: 935–9.Google Scholar

Malchau, SS, Loft, A, Henningsen, AK, Nyboe Andersen, A, Pinborg, A. Perinatal outcomes in 6,338 singletons born after intrauterine insemination in Denmark, 2007 to 2012: the influence of ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 1110–16.e2.Google Scholar

Hvidtjørn, D, Schieve, L, Schendel, D, et al. Cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorders, and developmental delay in children born after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009; 163: 72–83.Google Scholar

Kallen, B. The risk of neurodisability and other long-term outcomes for infants born following ART. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 19: 239–44.Google Scholar

Romundstad, LB, Romundstad, PR, Sunde, A, et al. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI: a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2353–8.Google Scholar

Kashyap, S, Claman, P. Polycystic ovary disease and the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 991–4.Google Scholar

Kuliev, A, Verlinsky, Y. The role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in women of advanced reproductive age. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003; 15: 233–8.Google Scholar

Corbett, S, Shmorgun, D, Claman, P, et al. The prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014; 36: 1024–36.Google ScholarPubMed

Ankum, WM, Mol, BW, Van der Veen, F, Bossuyt, PM. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 1093–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McMahon, CA, Ungerer, JA, Beaurepaire, J, Tennant, C, Saunders, D. Anxiety during pregnancy and fetal attachment after in-vitro fertilization conception. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 176–82.Google Scholar

Doherty, DA, Newnham, JP, Bower, C, Hart, R. Implications of polycystic ovary syndrome for pregnancy and for the health of offspring. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 1397–406.Google Scholar

McElhaney, RD, Ringer, M, DeHart, DJ, Vasilenko, P. Rubella immunity in a cohort of pregnant women. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20: 64–6.Google Scholar

Urman, B, Sarac, E, Dogan, L, Gurgan, T. Pregnancy in infertile PCOD patients. Complications and outcome. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 501–5.Google Scholar

Rackow, BW, Arici, A. Reproductive performance of women with Mullerian anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19: 229–37.Google Scholar

Syed, I, Hussain, HK, Weadock, W, Ellis, J. Imaging in Mullerian duct abnormalities. Medscape. Updated: Feb 28, 2016. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/405335-overview (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Golan, A, Langer, R, Neuman, M, et al. Obstetric outcome in women with congenital uterine malformations. J Reprod Med 1992; 37: 233–6.Google Scholar

Heinonen, PK. Pregnancies in women with uterine malformation, treated obstruction of hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287: 975–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Roberts, D, Jorgensen, AL. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (4): CD008991.Google Scholar

Iams, JD. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1861.Google Scholar

Heinonen, PK. Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies after abdominal or hysteroscopic metroplasty or no surgical treatment. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997; 4: 311–17.Google Scholar

Leiman, G, Harrison, NA, Rubin, A. Pregnancy following conization of the cervix: complications related to cone size. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 136: 14–18.Google Scholar

Pinborg, A, Ortoft, G, Loft, A, Rasmussen, SC, Ingerslev, HJ. Cervical conization doubles the risk of preterm and very preterm birth in assisted reproductive technology twin pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2015; 30: 197–204.Google Scholar

Ehsanipoor, RM, Jolley, JA, Goldshore, MA, et al. The relationship between previous treatment for cervical dysplasia and preterm delivery in twin gestations. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27: 821–4.Google Scholar

Cook, JR, Seman, EI. Pregnancy following endometrial ablation: case history and literature review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003; 58: 551–6.Google Scholar

Roux, I, Das, M, Fernandez, H, Deffieux, X. Pregnancy after endometrial ablation: a report of three cases. J Reprod Med 2013; 58: 173–6.Google Scholar

Yin, CS. Pregnancy after hysteroscopic endometrial ablation without endometrial preparation: a report of five cases and a literature review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 49: 311–19.Google Scholar

McShane, PM, Heye, PS, Epstein, ME. Maternal and perinatal mortality resulting from placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 176–82.Google Scholar

Oyelese, Y, Ananth, CV. Placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 1005–16.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Demissie, K, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Placenta previa in singleton and twin births in the United States, 1989 through 1998. A comparison of risk factor profiles and associated conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 275–81.Google Scholar

Fan, D, Wu, S, Liu, L, et al. Prevalence of antepartum hemorrhage in women with placenta previa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 40320. htps://doi.org/10.1038/srep40320.Google Scholar

Crane, JM, Van den Hof, MC, Dodds, L, Armson, BA, Liston, R. Maternal complications with placenta previa. Am J Perinatol. 2000; 17: 101–5.Google Scholar

Crane, JM, Van den Hof, MC, Dods, L, Armson, BA, Liston, R. Neonatal outcomes with placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 210–14.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM.The effects of placenta previa on neonatal mortality: a population based study in the United States, 1989 through 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1299–304.Google Scholar

Faiz, AS, Ananth, CV. Etiology and risk factors for placenta previa. An overview and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 13: 175–90.Google Scholar

Romundstad, LB, Romundstad, PR, Sunde, A, et al. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI: a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2353–8.Google Scholar

Naeye, RL. Abruptio placentae and placenta previa: frequency, perinatal mortality, and cigarette smoking. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55: 701–4.Google Scholar

Hibbard, BM. Bleeding in late pregnancy. In Hibbard, BM (ed.), Principles of Obstetrics. London: Butterworths, 1988, pp. 96–104.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, R, Fraser, D, Mazor, M, Leiberman, JR. One or more multiple previous cesarean sections are associated with similar increased frequency of placenta previa. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 62: 185–8.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. The association of placenta praevia with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177: 1071–8.Google Scholar

Knight, M, Bunch, K, Tuffnell, D, et al. (eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2015–17. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, 2019.Google Scholar

Cotton, DB, Read, JA, Paul, RH, Quilligan, EJ. The conservative aggressive management of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 687–95.Google Scholar

Drife, J, Lewis, G (eds). Why Mothers Die: A Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 2000–2002. London: Stationery Office, 2004.Google Scholar

Naeye, ER. Placenta previa: predisposing factors and effects on the fetus and the surviving infants. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 521–5.Google Scholar

Papinniemi, M, Keski-Nisula, L, Heinonen, S. Placental ratio and risk of velamentous umbilical cord insertion are increased in women with placenta previa. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24: 353–7.Google Scholar

Varma, TR. Fetal growth and placental function in patients with placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1971; 80: 311–15.Google Scholar

Taipale, P, Hiilesmaa, V, Ylostalo, P. Diagnosis of placenta previa by transvaginal sonographic screening at 12–16 weeks in a non-selected population. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 364–7.Google Scholar

Konje, JC, Ewings, PD, Adewunmi, OA, et al. The outcome of pregnancies complicated by threatened abortion. J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 12: 150–5.Google Scholar

Newton, ER, Barss, V, Cetrulo, CL. The epidemiology and clinical history of asymptomatic mid-trimester placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 743–8.Google Scholar

Chapman, MG, Furness, ET, Jones, WR, Sheat, JH. Significance of the location of placenta site in early pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 86: 846–8.Google Scholar

McClure, N, Dornan, JC. Early identification of placenta previa. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 959–61.Google Scholar

Laing, FC. Placenta previa: avoiding false-negative diagnosis. J Clin Ultrasound 1981; 9: 109–13.Google Scholar

Comeau, J, Shaw, L, Marcell, CC, Lavery, JP. Early placenta previa and delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 577–80.Google Scholar

Ruparelia, BA, Chapman, MG. Early low-lying placenta ultrasonic assessment, progress and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1985; 20: 209–13.Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, L; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Diagnosis and management of placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007; 29: 261–73.Google Scholar

Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Ramus, RM, et al. Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 692–7.Google Scholar

Tan, NH, Abu, M, Woo, JLS, Tahir, HM. The role of transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of placental previa. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 35: 42–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knuppel, AR, Drukker, JE. Bleeding in late pregnancy: antepartum bleeding. In Hayashi, RH, Castillo, MS (eds), High Risk Pregnancy: A Team Approach. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1986, pp. 547–80.Google Scholar

Heer, IM, Muller-Egloff, S, Strauss, A. Placenta previa: comparison of four sonographic modalities. Ultraschall Med 2006; 27: 355–9.Google Scholar

Simon, EG, Fouche, CJ, Perrotin, F. Three-dimensional transvaginal sonography in third-trimester evaluation of placenta previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41: 465–8.Google Scholar

Bonner, SM, Haynes, SR, Ryall, D. The anesthetic management of cesarean section for placenta previa: a questionnaire survey. Anesthesia 1995; 50: 992–4.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management. Green-top Guideline No. 27a. London: RCOG, 2018. www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg27a (accessed February 2020).Google Scholar

Ghourab, S. Third trimester transvaginal ultrasonography in placenta previa: does the shape of the lower placental edge predict clinical outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 103–8.Google Scholar

Neilson, JP. Interventions for suspected placenta previa. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (2): CD001998.Google Scholar

Love, CDB, Wallace, EM. Pregnancies complicated by placenta previa: what is appropriate management? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 864–7.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, C, Jones, DED, Parker, RT. Placenta previa: a survey of 20 years experience with improved perinatal survival by expectant therapy and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1973; 28: 461–70.Google Scholar

Brenner, WE, Edelman, DA, Hendricks, CH. Characteristics of patients with placenta previa and results of “expectant management”. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 132: 180–91.Google Scholar

Besinger, RE, Moniak, CW, Paskiewicz, LS, Fisher, SG, Tomich, PG. The effect of tocolytic use in the management of symptomatic placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1770–5.Google Scholar

Sharma, A, Suri, V, Gupta, I. Tocolytic therapy in conservative management of symptomatic placenta previa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 84: 109–13.Google Scholar

Vintzileos, AM, Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC. Using ultrasound in the clinical management of placental implantation abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: S70–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.059.Google Scholar

Silver, RM. Abnormal placentation: placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: 654–68. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001005.Google Scholar

Balayla, J, Wo, BL, Bedard, MJ. A late-preterm, early-term stratified analysis of neonatal outcomes by gestational age in placenta previa: defining the optimal timing for delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28: 1756–61.Google Scholar

Hong, J, Jee, Y, Yoon, H, Kim, S. Comparison of general and epidural anesthesia in elective cesarean section for placenta previa totalis: maternal hemodynamics, blood loss and neonatal outcome. Int J Obstet Anesth 2003; 12: 12–16.Google Scholar

Yamada, T, Mori, H, Ueki, M. Autologous blood transfusion in patients with placenta previa. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 255–9.Google Scholar

Scott, JS. Antepartum haemorrhage. In Whitefield, CR (ed.), Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for Postgraduates, 4th edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986, pp. 412–17.Google Scholar

Myerscough, PR (ed.). Munro Kerr’s Operative Obstetrics, 10th edn. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1982.Google Scholar

Williamson, HC, Greeley, AV. Management of placenta previa: 12 year study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1945; 50: 987–91.Google Scholar

Zaki, ZM, Bahar, AM. Massive haemorrhage due to placenta praevia accreta: a useful role for vasopressin. J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 17: 486–7.Google Scholar

Kato, S, Tanabe, A, Kanki, K, et al. Local injection of vasopressin reduces the blood loss during cesarean section in placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40: 1249–56.Google Scholar

Miller, DA, Chollet, JA, Goodwin, TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa–placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 210–14.Google Scholar

Clark, SL, Koonings, PP, Phelan, JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 89–92.Google Scholar

Silver, RM, Landon, MB, Rouse, DJ, et al.; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226–32.Google Scholar

Knight, M, Nair, M, Tuffnell, D, et al.; MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2013–15. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford 2017.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Lavery, JA, Vintzileos, AM, et al. Severe placental abruption: clinical definition and associations with maternal complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214: 272.e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.069.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, S, Irgrens, KM, Dalaker, K. The occurrence of placental abruption in Norway 1967–1991. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 222–8.Google Scholar

Fox, H (ed.). Pathology of the Placenta. London: Saunders, 1978.Google Scholar

Fraser, R, Watson, R. Bleeding during the latter half of pregnancy. In Chalmers, I (ed.), Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. London: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 89–92.Google Scholar

Sher, G, Statland, BE. Abruptio placentae with coagulopathy: a rational basis for management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1985; 28: 15–23.Google Scholar

Pritchard, JA, Brekken, AL. Clinical and laboratory studies on severe abruption placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967; 97: 681–700.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, S, Irgrens, KM, Dalaker, K. The effect on the likelihood of further pregnancy of placental abruption and the rate of its recurrence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1292–5.Google Scholar

Paterson, MEL. The aetiology and outcome of abruptio placentae. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1979; 58: 31–5.Google Scholar

Kramer, MS, Usher, RH, Pollack, R, et al. Etiologic determinants of abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 221–6.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Incidence of placental abruption in relation to cigarette smoking and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 622–8.Google Scholar

Lehtovirta, P, Forss, M. The acute effect of smoking on intervillous blood flow of the placenta. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1978; 85: 729–37.Google Scholar

Scott, JS. Placenta extrachoralis (placenta marginata and placenta circumvallata). J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1960; 67: 904–18.Google Scholar

Wilson, D, Paalman, RJ. Clinical significance of circumvallate placenta. Obstet Gynecol 1967; 29: 774–8.Google Scholar

Crosby, WM, Costila, JP. Safety of lap-belt restraint for pregnant victims of automobile collisions. N Engl J Med 1971; 284: 632–5.Google Scholar

Egley, C, Cefalo, R. Abruptio placentae. In Studd, J (ed.), Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 5. London, Churchill Livingstone,1985, pp. 108–20.Google Scholar

Yaron, Y, Cherry, M, Kramer, RL, et al. Second trimester maternal serum marker screening: maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, betahuman chorionic gonadotrophin, estriol, and their various combinations as predictors of pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 968–74.Google Scholar

Abdella, TN, Sibai, BM, Hays, JM, Anderson, GD. Relationship of hypertensive diseases to abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 365–70.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Savitz, DA, Williams, MA. Placental abruption and its association with hypertension and prolonged rupture of membranes: a methodologic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 309–18.Google Scholar

Golditch, IA, Boyce, NE. Management of abruptio placentae. JAMA 1970; 212: 288–93.Google Scholar

De Valera, E. Abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 100: 599–606.Google Scholar

De Vries, JI, Dekker, GA, Huijgens, PC, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia and protein S deficiency in complicated pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1248–54.Google Scholar

Kupferminc, MJ, Eldor, A, Steinman, N, et al. Increased frequency of genetic thrombophilia in women with complications of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 9–13.Google Scholar

Zdoukopoulos, N, Zintzaras, E. Genetic risk factors for placental abruption: a HuGE review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology 2008; 19: 309–323.Google Scholar

Pariente, G, Wiznitzer, A, Sergienko, R, Mazor, M, Holcberg, G, Sheiner, E. Placental abruption: critical analysis of risk factors and perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 24: 698–702.Google Scholar

Kennare, R, Heard, A, Chan, A. Substance use during pregnancy: risk factors and obstetric and perinatal outcomes in South Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 45: 220–5.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Wilcox, AJ. Placental abruption and perinatal mortality in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153: 332–7.Google Scholar

Tikkanen, M, Luukkaala, T, Gissler, M, et al. Decreasing perinatal mortality in placental abruption. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92: 298–305.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, VanderWeele, TJ. Placental abruption and perinatal mortality with preterm delivery as a mediator: disentangling direct and indirect effects. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 174: 99–108.Google Scholar

Aliyu, MH, Salihu, HM, Lynch, O, et al. Placental abruption, offspring sex, and birth outcomes in a large cohort of mothers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 248–52.Google Scholar

Tikkanen, M. Placental abruption: epidemiology, risk factors and consequences. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90: 140–9.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Berkowitz, GS, Savitz, DA, Lapinski, RH. Placental abruption and adverse perinatal outcomes. JAMA 1999; 282: 1646–51.Google Scholar

Sheiner, E, Shoham-Vardi, I, Hadar, A, et al. Incidence, obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome of preterm placental abruption: a retrospective analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 11: 34–9.Google Scholar

Lunan, CB. The management of abruptio placentae. J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw 1973; 80: 120–4.Google Scholar

Gibbs, JM, Weindling, AM. Neonatal intracranial lesions following placental abruption. Eur J Pediatr 1994; 153: 195–7.Google Scholar

Niswander, KR, Friedman, EA, Hoover, DB, et al. Fetal morbidity following potentially atoxigenic obstetric conditions: I. Abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 95: 838–45.Google Scholar

Glantz, C, Purnell, L. Clinical utility of sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of placental abruption. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 837–40.Google Scholar

Roberts, G. Unclassified antepartum haemorrhage: incidence and perinatal mortality in a community. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1970; 77: 492–5.Google Scholar

Hurd, WW, Miodovnik, M, Lavin, JP. Selective management of abruption placentae: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 467–73.Google Scholar

Notelovitz, M, Bottoms, SF, Dase, DF, Leichter, PJ. Painless abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 53: 270–2.Google Scholar

Page, EW, King, EB, Merril, JA. Abruptio placentae: dangers of delayed delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1954; 3: 385–93.Google Scholar

Green-Thompson, RW. Antepartum haemorrhage. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1982; 9: 479–515.Google ScholarPubMed

Nyberg, DA, Cyr, DR, Mack, LA, Wilson, DA, Shuman, WP. Sonographic spectrum of placental abruption. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 161–7.Google Scholar

Rivera-Alxima, ME, Saldana, LR, Maklad, N, Korp, S. The use of ultrasound in the expectant management of abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 924–7.Google Scholar

Barron, SL. Antepartum haemorrhage. In Chamberlain, G, Turnbull, A (eds), Obstetrics. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1989, pp. 176–88.Google Scholar

Okonofua, FE, Olatubosun, OA. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery in abruptio placentae associated with live fetuses. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1985; 23: 471–4.Google Scholar

Besinger, RE, Niebyl, JR. The safety and efficacy of tocolytics agents for the treatment of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1990; 45: 415–40.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Tocolytic Drugs for Women in Preterm Labour. Green-top Guideline No. 1b. London: RCOG, 2011.Google Scholar

Towers, CV, Pircon, RA, Heppard, M. Is tocolysis safe in the management of third-trimester bleeding? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1572–8.Google Scholar

Colón, I, Berletti, M, Garabedian, MJ, et al. Randomized, double-blinded trial of magnesium sulfate tocolysis versus intravenous normal saline for preterm nonsevere placental abruption. Am J Perinatol 2016; 33: 696–702. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571324.Google Scholar

Ruiter, L, Ravelli, AC, de Graaf, IM, Mol, BW, Pajkrt, E. Incidence and recurrence rate of placental abruption: a longitudinal linked national cohort study in the Netherlands. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 573.e1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.019.Google Scholar

Roberge, S, Bujold, E, Nicolaides, KH. Meta-analysis on the effect of aspirin use for prevention of preeclampsia on placental abruption and antepartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218: 483–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.238.Google Scholar

Kim, YA. Makar, RS. Detection of fetomaternal hemorrhage. Am J Hematol 2012; 87: 417–23.Google Scholar

Oyelese, KO, Turner, M, Lees, C, Campbell, S. Vasa previa: an avoidable obstetric tragedy. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 18: 109–15.Google Scholar

Baulies, S, Maiz, N, Muñoz, A, et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of vasa previa and analysis of risk factors. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27: 595–9.Google Scholar

Englert, Y, Imbert, MC, Van Rosendael, E, et al. Morphological anomalies in the placentae of IVF pregnancies: preliminary report of a multicentric study. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 155–7.Google Scholar

Jauniaux, E, Englert, Y, Vanesse, M, et al. Pathologic features of placentas from singleton pregnancies obtained by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 61–4.Google Scholar

Lee, W, Lee, VL, Kirk, JS, et al. Vasa previa: prenatal diagnosis, natural evolution, and clinical outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 572–6.Google Scholar

Rebarber, A, Dolin, C, Fox, NS, et al. Natural history of vasa previa across gestation using a screening protocol. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 141–7.Google Scholar

Bronsteen, R, Whitten, A, Balasubramanian, M, et al. Vasa previa: clinical presentations, outcomes, and implications for management. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 352–7.Google Scholar

Antoine, C, Young, BK, Silverman, F, Greco, MA, Alvarez, SP. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern with vasa previa in twin pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1982; 27: 295–300.Google Scholar

Dougall, A, Baird, CH. Vasa previa: report of three cases and review of literature. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 712–15.Google Scholar

Derbala, Y, Grochal, F, Jeanty, P. Vasa previa. J Prenat Med 2007; 1: 2–13.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Placenta Praevia, Placenta Praevia Accreta and Vasa Praevia: Diagnosis and Management. Green-top Guideline No. 27. London: RCOG, 2011. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg27/ (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Gagnon, R, Morin, L, Bly, S, et al. Guidelines for the management of vasa previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009; 31: 748–60.Google Scholar

Oyelese, Y, Catanzarite, V, Prefumo, F, et al. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 937–42.Google Scholar

Paavonen, J, Jouttunpää, K, Kangasluoma, P, et al. Velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord and vasa previa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1984; 22: 207–11.Google Scholar

Watson, R. Antepartum haemorrhage of uncertain origin. Br J Clin Pract 1982; 36: 222–6.Google Scholar

Macafee, CHG, Harley, JMG. Antepartum haemorrhage. In Claye, A (ed.), British Obstetric Practice: Obstetrics, 3rd edn. London: Heinemann, 1963, pp 195–204.Google Scholar

Willocks, J. Antepartum haemorrhage of uncertain origin. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1971; 78: 987–91.Google Scholar

Naftolin, F, Khudr, G, Benirschke, K, Hutchinson, DL. The syndrome of chronic abruptio placentae, hydorrhoea and circumvallate placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973; 116: 347–50.Google Scholar

Walker, J, MacGillivary, I, MacNaughton, MC (eds). Combined Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 9th edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1976, pp. 133–45.Google Scholar

Boyle, B, McConkey, R, Garne, E, et al. Trends in the prevalence, risk and pregnancy outcome of multiple births with congenital anomaly: a registry-based study in 14 European countries 1984–2007. BJOG 2013; 120: 707–16.Google Scholar

Office for National Statistics. Birth characteristics in England and Wales: 2016. Statistical Bulletin October 2017. www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthcharacteristicsinenglandandwales/2016 (accessed September 2018).Google Scholar

Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, Driscoll, AK, Drake, P. Births: final data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018; 67(1): 1–55. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_01.pdf (accessed September 2018).Google Scholar

Vayssiere, C, Benoist, G, Blondel, B, et al. Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 156: 12–17.Google Scholar

Hall, JG. Twinning. Lancet 2003; 362: 735–43.Google Scholar

Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Sutton, PD, et al. Births: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009; 57: 1–102Google Scholar

Chauhan, SP, Scardo, JA, Hayes, E, Abuhamad, AZ, Berghella, V. Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 305–15.Google Scholar

Macfarlane, A, Blondel, B. Demographic trends in Western European countries. In Blickstein, I, Keith, LG (eds), Multiple Pregnancy: Epidemiology, Gestation, and Perinatal Outcome, 2nd edn. London: Taylor & Francis, 2005, pp. 11–21.Google Scholar

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Multiple births and single embryo transfer review, 2013. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/Multiple-births-after-IVF.html (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Weber, MA, Sebire, NJ. Genetics and developmental pathology of twinning. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 15: 313–18.Google Scholar

Benirschke, K, Kim, CK. Multiple pregnancy. 2. N Engl J Med 1973; 288: 1329–36.Google Scholar

Derom, C, Vlietinck, R, Derom, R, Van den Berghe, H, Thiery, M. Increased monozygotic twinning rate after ovulation induction. Lancet 1987; 1: 1236–8.Google Scholar

Umranikar, A, Parmar, D, Davies, S, Fountain, S. Multiple births following in vitro fertilization treatment: redefining success. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170: 299–304.Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Fertility Problems: Assessment and Treatment. Clinical Guideline CG156. London: NICE, 2013. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156 (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Multiple Pregnancy Following Assisted Reproduction. Scientific Impact Paper No. 22. London: RCOG, 2011. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/sip_no_22.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Luke, B, Brown, MB, Wantman, E, Stern, JE. Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 683–9.Google Scholar

Busnelli, A, Dallagiovanna, C, Reschini, M, et al. Risk factors for monozygotic twinning after in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2019; 111: 302–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.025.Google Scholar

Glujovsky, D, Blake, D, Farquhar, C, Bardach, A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (7): CD002118.Google Scholar

McLernon, D, Harrild, K, Bergh, C, et al. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 341: c6945.Google Scholar

Gelbaya, TA, Tsoumpou, I, Nardo, LG. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 936–45.Google Scholar

Luke, B, Gopal, D, Cabral, H, et al. Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217: 330.e1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.025.Google Scholar

Helmerhorst, FM, Perquin, DA, Donker, D, Keirse, MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 2004; 328: 261.Google Scholar

Santana, DS, Cecatti, JG, Surita, FG, et al. Twin pregnancy and severe maternal outcomes: the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127: 631–41. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001338.Google Scholar

Rao, A, Sairam, S, Shehata, H. Obstetric complications of twin pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 18: 557–76.Google Scholar

Sibai, BM, Hauth, J, Caritis, S, et al. Hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 938–42.Google Scholar

Laine, K, Murzakanova, G, Sole, KB, et al. Prevalence and risk of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension in twin pregnancies: a population-based register study. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (7): e029908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029908.Google Scholar

Schwartz, DB, Daoud, Y, Zazula, P, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: metabolic and blood glucose parameters in singleton versus twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 912–14.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, RL, Culhane, JF, Iams, JD, Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371: 75–84.Google Scholar

Blondel, B, Macfarlane, A, Gissler, M, Breart, G, Zeitlin, J. General obstetrics: preterm birth and multiple pregnancy in European countries participating in the PERISTAT project. BJOG 2006; 113: 528–35.Google Scholar

Victoria, A, Mora, G, Arias, F. Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 310–15.Google Scholar

Ross, LE, McQueen, K, Vigod, S, Dennis, CL. Risk for postpartum depression associated with assisted reproductive technologies and multiple births: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 96–106.Google Scholar

Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths to Make Motherhood Safe: 2003–2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH, 2007.Google Scholar

Sebire, N Anomalous development in twins (including monozygotic duplication). In Kilby, M, Baker, P, Critchley, H, Field, D (eds), Multiple Pregnancy. London: RCOG Press; 2006, pp. 59–88.Google Scholar

Glinianaia, SV, Rankin, J, Wright, C. Congenital anomalies in twins: a register-based study. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1306–11.Google Scholar

Morin, L, Lim, K, Bly, S, et al. Ultrasound in twin pregnancies: no. 260, June 2011. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2011; 115: 117–18.Google Scholar

Berghella, V, Saccone, G. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 9: CD007235. https://doi.org//10.1002/14651858.CD007235.pub4.Google Scholar

Sun, LM, Chen, XK, Wen, SW, et al. Perinatal outcomes of normal cotwins in twin pregnancies with one structurally anomalous fetus: a population-based retrospective study. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26: 51–6.Google Scholar

Pandya, PP, Snijders, RJ, Psara, N, Hilbert, L, Nicolaides, KH. The prevalence of non-viable pregnancy at 10–13 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 170–3.Google Scholar

Sebire, NJ, Snijders, RJ, Hughes, K, Sepulveda, W, Nicolaides, KH. The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1203–7.Google Scholar

D’Antonio, F, Khalil, A, Dias, T, Thilaganathan, B. Early fetal loss in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 632–6.Google Scholar

Sebire, NJ, Thornton, S, Hughes, K, Snijders, RJ, Nicolaides, KH. The prevalence and consequences of missed abortion in twin pregnancies at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 847–8.Google Scholar

Landy, H, Keith, L. The vanishing twin: a review. Hum Reprod Update 1998; 4: 177–83.Google Scholar

Kamath, MS, Antonisamy, B, Selliah, HY, Sunkara, SK. Perinatal outcomes of singleton live births with and without vanishing twin following transfer of multiple embryos: analysis of 113 784 singleton live births. Hum Reprod 2018; 33: 2018–22. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey284.Google Scholar

Ong, S, Zamora, J, Khan, K, Kilby, M. Prognosis for the co-twin following single-twin death: a systematic review. BJOG 2006; 113: 992–8.Google Scholar

Hillman, SC, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Co-twin prognosis after single fetal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 928–40.Google Scholar

D’Antonio, F, Thilaganathan, B, Dias, T, et al. Influence of chorionicity and gestational age at single fetal loss on risk of preterm birth in twin pregnancy: analysis of STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 50: 723–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.17426.Google Scholar

Breathnach, FM, Malone, FD. Fetal growth disorders in twin gestations. Semin Perinatol 2012; 36: 175–81.Google Scholar

Breathnach, FM, McAuliffe, FM, Geary, M, et al. Definition of intertwin birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 94–103.Google Scholar

Lewi, L, Deprest, J. Management of twin pregnancies: where do we go from here? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 601–4.Google Scholar

Kalafat, E, Thilaganathan, B, Papageorghiou, A, Bhide, A, Khalil, A. Significance of placental cord insertion site in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 378–84. doi: 10.1002/uog.18914.Google Scholar

Couck, I, Mourad Tawfic, N, Deprest, J, et al. Does site of cord insertion increase risk of adverse outcome, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome and discordant growth in monochorionic twin pregnancy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 385–9. doi: 10.1002/uog.18926.Google Scholar

Jones, R, Roberton, N. Small for dates babies: are they really a problem? Arch Dis Child 1986; 61: 877–80.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 169: Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: e131–46.Google Scholar

Miller, J, Chauhan, SP, Abuhamad, AZ. Discordant twins: diagnosis, evaluation and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 10–20.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Joseph, K, Demissie, K, Vintzileos, AM. Trends in twin preterm birth subtypes in the United States, 1989 through 2000: impact on perinatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1076.e1–9.Google Scholar

Kiely, JL. What is the population-based risk of preterm birth among twins and other multiples? Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998; 41: 3–11.Google Scholar

Stoll, BJ, Hansen, NI, Bell, EF, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 443–56.Google Scholar

Murphy, D, MacKenzie, I. The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 826–30.Google Scholar

Cohen, M, Kohl, S, Rosenthal, A. Fetal interlocking complicating twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965; 91: 407–12.Google Scholar

Pharoah, P. Neurological outcome in twins. Semin Neonatol 2002; 7: 223–30.Google Scholar

MBRRACE-UK. Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report: UK perinatal deaths for births from January to December 2014. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, 2016. https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/downloads/files/mbrrace-uk/reports/MBRRACE-UK-PMS-Report-2014.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Draper, ES, Gallimore, ID, Kurinczuk, JJ, et al., on behalf of the MBRRACE-UK Collaboration. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report, UK Perinatal Deaths for Births from January to December 2016. Leicester: Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2018.Google Scholar

Danon, D, Sekar, R, Hack, KE, Fisk, NM. Increased stillbirth in uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 1318–26.Google Scholar

Dube, J, Dodds, L, Armson, BA. Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 579–83.Google Scholar

Barigye, O, Pasquini, L, Galea, P, et al. High risk of unexpected late fetal death in monochorionic twins despite intensive ultrasound surveillance: a cohort study. PLoS Med 2005; 2 (6): e172.Google Scholar

Spitz, L. Conjoined twins. Prenat Diagn 2005; 25: 814–19.Google Scholar

Mutchinick, OM, Luna-Muñoz, L, Amar, E, et al. Conjoined twins: a worldwide collaborative epidemiological study of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2011; 157C: 274–87.Google Scholar

Chen, CP, Hsu, CY, Su, JW, et al. Conjoined twins detected in the first trimester: a review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 50: 424–31.Google Scholar

Dias, T, Mahsud-Dornan, S, Bhide, A, Papageorghiou, AT, Thilaganathan, B. Cord entanglement and perinatal outcome in monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 201–4.Google Scholar

Baxi, LV, Walsh, CA. Monoamniotic twins in contemporary practice: a single-center study of perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 506–10.Google Scholar

Hack, KE, Derks, JB, Schaap, AH, et al. Perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 353–60.Google Scholar

Rossi, AC, Prefumo, F. Impact of cord entanglement on perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twins: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 131–5.Google Scholar

Sueters, M, Oepkes, D. Diagnosis of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, selective fetal growth restriction, twin anaemia-polycythaemia sequence, and twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28: 215–26.Google Scholar

Khalil, A, Beune, I, Hecher, K, et al. Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 47–54. doi: 10.1002/uog.19013.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy, 2nd edn. Green-top Guideline No. 51. London: RCOG, 2016. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg51/ (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Gratacos, E, Antolin, E, Lewi, L, et al. Monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic flow (Type III): feasibility and perinatal outcome of fetoscopic placental laser coagulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 669–75.Google Scholar

Gratacos, E, Lewi, L, Muñoz, B, et al. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 28–34.Google Scholar

Healey, MG. Acardia: predictive risk factors for the co-twin’s survival. Teratology 1994; 50: 205–13.Google Scholar

Lewi, L, Valencia, C, Gonzalez, E, Deprest, J, Nicolaides, KH. The outcome of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence diagnosed in the first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 213.e1–4.Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrauterine laser ablation of placental vessels for the treatment of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance IPG198. London: NICE, 2006. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg198 (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Denbow, M, Fogliani, R, Kyle, P, et al. Haematological indices at fetal blood sampling in monochorionic pregnancies complicated by feto-fetal transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18: 941–6.Google Scholar

Stagnati, V, Zanardini, C, Fichera, A, et al. Early prediction of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016. doi: 10.1002/uog.15989. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar

Mackie, FL, Whittle, R, Morris, RK, et al. First-trimester ultrasound measurements and maternal serum biomarkers as prognostic factors in monochorionic twins: a cohort study. Diagn Progn Res 2019; 3: 9. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0054-9.Google Scholar

Simpson, LL. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 3–18.Google Scholar

Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, et al. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol 1999; 19: 550–5.Google Scholar

Lopriore, E, Oepkes, D, Walther, FJ. Neonatal morbidity in twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Early Hum Dev 2011; 87: 595–9.Google Scholar

Tollenaar, LSA, Lopriore, E, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Improved prediction of twin anemia–polycythemia sequence by delta middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity: new antenatal classification system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 788–93. doi: 10.1002/uog.20096.Google Scholar

Tavares de Sousa, M, Fonseca, A, Hecher, K. Role of fetal intertwin difference in middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity in predicting neonatal twin anemia–polycythemia sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 794–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.20116.Google Scholar

Slaghekke, F, Kist, WJ, Oepkes, D, et al. Twin anemia–polycythemia sequence: diagnostic criteria, classification, perinatal management and outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010; 27: 181–90.Google Scholar