Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps
- List of illustrations
- List of tables
- List of figures
- Chronology
- Glossary
- A political who's who of modern Iran
- Preface
- Map 1 Iran and the Middle East
- Map 2 Iranian provinces
- Introduction
- 1 “Royal despots”: state and society under the Qajars
- 2 Reform, revolution, and the Great War
- 3 The iron fist of Reza Shah
- 4 The nationalist interregnum
- 5 Muhammad Reza Shah's White Revolution
- 6 The Islamic Republic
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Further reading
- Index
1 - “Royal despots”: state and society under the Qajars
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps
- List of illustrations
- List of tables
- List of figures
- Chronology
- Glossary
- A political who's who of modern Iran
- Preface
- Map 1 Iran and the Middle East
- Map 2 Iranian provinces
- Introduction
- 1 “Royal despots”: state and society under the Qajars
- 2 Reform, revolution, and the Great War
- 3 The iron fist of Reza Shah
- 4 The nationalist interregnum
- 5 Muhammad Reza Shah's White Revolution
- 6 The Islamic Republic
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Further reading
- Index
Summary
Kingdoms known to man have been governed in two ways: either by a prince and his servants, who, as ministers by his grace and permission, assist in governing the realm; or by a prince and by barons, who hold their positions not by favor of the ruler but by antiquity of blood. Such barons have states and subjects of their own, who recognize them as their lords, and are naturally attached to them. In those states which are governed by a prince and his servants, the prince possesses more authority, because there is no one in the state regarded as superior, and if others are obeyed it is merely as ministers and officials of the prince, and no one regards them with any special affection. Examples of the two kinds of government in our time are those of the Turk and the King of France.
Nicolò dei Machiavelli, The PrinceTHE QAJAR STATE
Nineteenth-century Europeans tended to depict the Qajars as typical “oriental despots.” Their despotism, however, existed mainly in the realm of virtual reality. In theory, the shah may have claimed monopoly over the means of violence, administration, taxation, and adjudication. His word was law. He appointed and dismissed all officials – from court ministers, governor-generals, and tribal chiefs, all the way down to village and ward headmen. He made and unmade all dignitaries, bestowing and withdrawing honors and titles. He even claimed to own all property, treating the country as his own private estate.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A History of Modern Iran , pp. 8 - 33Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
- 1
- Cited by