Alsop, S. (2005). Beyond Cartesian dualism. Encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Anzaldua, G. C. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontiera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Spinster/Aunt Lute.Google Scholar

Bakhurst, D. (2007). Vygotsky's demons. In Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 50–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12 (3), 307–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barron, B. (2004). Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateson, M. C. (1990). Composing a life. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bearison, D. J. (1991). Interactional contexts of cognitive development: Piagetian approaches to sociogenesis. In Landsmann, L. T. (Ed.), Culture, cognition and schooling (pp. 56–70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Becker, H. S., & Carper, J. W. (1956). The development of identification with an occupation. The American Journal of Sociology, 61(4), 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, H. (1982). School is a lousy place to learn anything in. American Behavioral Scientist, 16, 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, P., Bricker, L. A., Lee, T. R., Reeve, S., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2006). Understanding the cultural foundations of children's biological knowledge: Insights from everyday cognition research. In Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E, & Hickey, D. T (Eds.), Proceedings from the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 1029–1035). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bell, P., Zimmerman, H. T., Bricker, L. A., & Lee, T. (2006). The everyday cultural foundations of children's biological understanding in an urban, high-poverty community. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar

Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bransford, J., Vye, N., Stevens, R., Kuhl, P., Schwartz, D., Bell, P., et al. (2006). Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy. In Alexander, P. & Winne, P. (Eds.), Handbook of education psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52 (4), 399–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name. In Kuhn, D. (Ed.), Developmental perspectives on teaching and learning thinking skills. New York, NY: Kanger.Google Scholar

Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In McGilly, K. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In Schauble, L. & Glaser, R. (Eds.), Innovation in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1966). After John Dewey, what? In Bruner, J. (Ed.), On knowing: Essays for the left hand. New York, NY: Atheneum.Google Scholar

Burke, K. (1945). Grammar of motives. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Butterfield, E. C., & Nelson, G. D. (1991). Promoting positive transfer of different types. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 69–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28, 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Chapin, S. H., O'Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions.Google Scholar

Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for scienceinstruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, E. G. (1984). Talking and working together: Status, interaction and learning. In Peterson, P., Wilkinson, L. C. & Hallinan, M. (Eds.), The social context of instruction: Group organization and group process (pp. 171–189). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar

Cohen, E. G. (1990). Teaching in multiculturally heterogeneous classrooms: Findings from a model program. McGill Journal of Education, 26 (1), 7–23.Google Scholar

Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2 ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cornelius, L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students' relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22 (4), 467–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cubberley, E. P. (1919). Public education in the United States: A study and interpretation of American educational history. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Damon, W. (1983). Social and personality development: Infancy through adolescence. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeAvila, E. A. (1987). Finding out/descubrimiento. Northvale, NJ: Santillana.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1902). The school as the socialcenter. The Elementary School Teacher, 3 (2), 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath & Company.Google Scholar

Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., & Munro, S. (2007). Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science, 318 (5855), 1387–1388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dreeban, R. (1968). On what is learned in school. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. (1984). What expert systems can't do. Raritan, 3 (4), 22–36.Google Scholar

Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dyson, A. H. (1995). The courage to write: Child meaning making in a contested world. Language Arts, 72 (5), 324–333.Google Scholar

Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. C. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20 (4399–483).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engle, R. A., McKinney de Royston, M., & Langer-Osuna, J. (2008). Toward a model of differential influence in discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, and access within a heated classroom argument. Paper presented at the Cognitive Science Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Erickson, F. (2002). Culture and human development. Human Development, 45 (4), 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In Green, J. L., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177–191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar

Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar

Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. (2007). Power in numbers: An analysis of how shifts in social and mathematical power among students in a cooperative group affect opportunities for learning. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analysing teaching behaviour. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forman, E. A., & Ansell, E. (2002). Orchestrating the multiple voices and inscriptions of a mathematics classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11 (2&3), 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forman, E. A., & Ansell, E. (2005). Creating mathematics stories: Learning to explain in a third-grade classroom. In Nemirovsky, R., Rosebery, A. S., Solomon, J. & Warren, B. (Eds.), Everyday matters in science and mathematics: Studies of complex classroom events. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1999). Power as knowledge. In Lemert, C. (Ed.), Social theory: The multicultural and classic readings (pp. 475–478). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In Lester, J. F. K. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225–256). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Gee, J. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, UK: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Gergen, K. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Goodnow, J. J. (1990). The socialization of cognition: What's involved? In Stigler, J. W., Shweder, R. A. & Herdt, G. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 259–286). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graff, G. (1992). Beyond the culture wars: How teaching the conflicts can revitalize American education. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar

Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers and Children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O'Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., et al. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58 (6–7), 466–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26 (1), 5–17.Google Scholar

Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53 (1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greeno, J. G. (2002). Students with competence, authority, and accountability: Affording intellective identities in classrooms. New York, NY: The College Board.Google Scholar

Gresalfi, M. S. (2009). Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18 (3), 327–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutiérrez, K., & Stone, L. (2000). Synchronic and diachronic dimensions of social practice: An emerging methodology for cultural-historical perspectives on literacy learning. In Lee, C. D & Smagorinsky, P (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 150–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gutierrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 22(5), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haroutunian-Gordon, S., & Waks, L. J. (in press). Listening: Challenges for teachers. Teachers College Record.

Harter, S. (1999). The construction of self: A developmental perspective. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Heath, S. B. (1986). Sociocultural contexts of language development. In Beyond Language: Social and Cultural Factors in Schooling Language Minority Students. Los Angeles, CA: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center.Google Scholar

Heath, S. B. (1995). Race, ethnicity, and the defiance of categories. In Hawley, W. D. & Jackson, A. W. (Eds.), Toward A Common Destiny: Improving Race And Ethnic Relations in America (pp. 39–70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behaviors. Journal of Labor Economics, 24 (3), 411–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hegedus, S. J., & Penuel, W. R. (2008). Studying new forms of participation and identity in mathematics classrooms with integrated communication and representational infrastructures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68 (2), 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participation structure, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 431–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1999). Moving classrooms beyond transmission models of teaching and learning. In Bibace, R., Dillon, J. J. & Dowds, B. N. (Eds.), Partnerships in research, clinical and educational settings (Vol. 18, pp. 161–178). Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar

Herrenkohl, L. R., Palinscar, A. S., DeWater, L. S., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8 (3& 4), 451–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrenkohl, L. R., & Wertsch, J. V. (1999). The use of cultural tools: Mastery and appropriation. In Sigel, I. (Ed.), Development of mental representation: Theories and applications (pp. 415–435). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Herrenkohl, L.R., White, B., Tasker, T. (under review). Pedagogical practices to support classroom cultures of scientific inquiry.

Hickey, D. T., & Schafer, N. J. (2006). Sociocultural, knowledge-centered views of classroom management. In Evertson, C. & Weinstein, C. (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, & contemporary issues (pp. 281–308). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hicks, D. (1996). Discourse, learning, and schooling. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinde, R. A., Perret-Clermont, A. N., & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (Eds.). (1985). Social relationships and cognitive development. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Holland, D., & Lachicotte, W. (2007). Vygotsky, Mead, and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In Daniels, H, Cole, M, & Wertsch, J. V (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 101–135). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79 (1), 491–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Inhelder, B. (1974). If you want to get ahead, get a theory. Cognition, 3 (3), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kawasaki, K., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Yeary, S. A. (2004). Theory building and modeling in a sinking and floating unit: A case study of third and fourth grade students' developing epistemologies of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (11), 1299–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kazemi, E., & Hubbard, A. (2008). New directions for the design and study of professional development: Attending to the coevolution of teachers' participation across contexts. Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5), 428–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 155–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27 (1), 29–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lampert, M., & Graziani, F. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers' and teacher educators' learning. Elementary School Journal, 109 (5), 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, C. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students' skill in literacy interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 608–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, C. D. (2000). Signifying in the zone of proximal development. In Lee, C. D & Smagorinsky, P (Eds.), Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 191–225). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, C. D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2005). Developing modeling and argument in the elementary grades. In Romberg, T. A., Carpenter, T. P. & Dremock, F. (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 29–53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lemke, J. (2000). The long and the short of it: Comments on multiple timescale studies of human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10 (1–2), 193–202.Google Scholar

Lemke, J. (2000). Across the scales of time: artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7 (4), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35 (3), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In Adelson, J. (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159–187). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. B. (1980). Philosophy and the young child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. B. (1984). The philosophy of childhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, W. (1984). Influences on the learning and participation of minorities in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15 (2), 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3, 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercier, E., Mertl, V., Tyson, K., Barron, B., Herrenkohl, L., Nasir, N., et al. (2008). Repertoires of collaborative practice: A theoretical introduction. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar

Mertl, V. (2009). “Don't touch anything, it might break!”: Adolescent musicians' accounts of collaboration and access to technologies seminal to their musical practice. In Dimitracopoulou, A., O'Malley, C., Suthers, D., & Reimann, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences Inc.Google Scholar

Mertl, V., O'Mahony, K., Honwad, S., Tyson, K., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Hoadley, C. (2008). Analyzing collaborative contexts: Professional musicians, corporate engineers, and communities in the Himalayas. In Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E, & Hickey, D. T (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS). Utrecht, The Netherlands. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Mertl, V., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2006). Dispositions: Bridging the intellectual, social, and personal dimension of learning. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar

Michaels, S., Shouse, A. W., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2008). Ready, set, science! Putting research to work in k-8 science classrooms. Board on science education, center for education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Moll, L. C. (1990). Introduction. In Moll, L. C. (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 1–27). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moll, L. C. (2001). Through the mediation of others: Vygotskian research on teaching. In Richardson, V. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 111–129). Washington, DC: AERA Wittrock, M.C.Google Scholar

Moll, L. C., & Greenberg, J. B. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining socialcontexts for instruction. In Moll, L. C. (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 319–348). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nasir, N. S. (2006). But when is identity?: Challenges and tensions in operationalizing identity in studies of learning. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76 (4), 449–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nasir, N.S., Rosebery, A.S., Warren, B., and Lee, C.D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 489–504). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

,National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar

,National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (1999). The discernment of perception: An Aristotelian conception of private and public rationality. In Sherman, N. (Ed.), Aristotle's ethics (pp. 145–181). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

O'Connor, K. (2001). Contextualization and the negotiation of social identities in a situated learning project. Linguistics & Education, 12 (3), 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Connor, K. (2003). Communicative practice, cultural production, and situated learning: Constructing and contesting identities of expertise in a heterogeneous learning context. In Wortham, S. & Rymes, B. (Eds.), The linguistic anthropology of education. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24 (4), 318–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In Hicks, D. (Ed.), Child discourse and social learning (pp. 63–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oatley, K., & Nundy, S. (1996). Rethinking the role of emotions in education. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and schooling (pp. 257–274). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ochs, E., Schieffelin, B., & Platt, M., “ in, ed. by.. (1979). Propositions across utterances and speakers. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 251–268). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35 (4), 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1 (2), 117–175.Google Scholar

Payton, J., Weissberg, R. P., Durlack, J. A., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., Schellinger, K. B., et al. (2008). The positive impact of social and emotional learning for kindergarten to eighth-grade students: Findings from three scientific reviews. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL).Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child (D. Coltman, Trans.). New York, NY: Orion Press.Google Scholar

Polman, J. L. (2004). Dialogic activity structures for project-based learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 22 (4), 431–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1 (4), 209–229.Google Scholar

Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In Wertsch, J.V., Rio, P. D, & Alvarez, A (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rose, M. (1995). Possible lives: The promise of public education in America. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Rosebery, A. S., & Warren, B. (2000). Children's ways with words in science and mathematics: A conversation across disciplines. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar

Rosebery, A. S., & Warren, B. (2008). Introduction. In Rosebery, A. S. & Warren, B. (Eds.), Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students' strengths. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar

Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of Learning Sciences, 2 (1), 61–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans, American Association for the Advancement of Science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. K. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schauble, L. (1990). Belief revision in children: The role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 31–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schauble, L., Klopfer, L., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students' transformation from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 (9), 859–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shulman, L. S., & Quinlan, K. M. (1996). The comparative psychology of school subjects. In Berliner, D. & Calfee, R. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 399–673). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar

Siegler, R. S. (1985). Encoding and the development of problem solving. In Chipman, S. F., Segal, W. & Glaser, R. (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Toward and analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(761–784).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spiro, M. E. (1982). Collective representations and mental representations in religious symbol systems. In Maquet, J. (Ed.), On symbols in anthropology: Essays in honor of Harry Hoijer (pp. 45–72). Malibu: Udena Publications.Google Scholar

Stevens, R., O'Connor, K., & Garrison, L. (2005). Engineering student identities in the navigation of the undergraduate curriculum. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.Google Scholar

Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1998). Teaching is a cultural activity. American Educator, 22 (4), 4–11.Google Scholar

Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. (1992). Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Veer, R., (2001). The idea of units of analysis: Vygotsky‘s contribution. In Chaiklin, S. (Ed.), The theory and practice of cultural-historical pedagogy (pp. 93–106). Aarhus, DK: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar

Veer, R., (2007). Vygotsky in context: 1900–1935. In Daniels, H, Cole, M& Wertsch, J. V(Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 21–50). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Veresov, N. (1999). Undiscovering Vygotsky: Etudes on the prehistory of cultural-historical psychology. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987/1934). Thinking and speech (N. Minick, Trans.). In Rieber, R. W. & Carton, A. S. (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Wahl, K. H., & Blackhurst, A. (2000). Factors affecting the occupational and educational aspirations of children and adolescents. Professional School Counseling, 3 (5), 367–374.Google Scholar

Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (5), 529–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Conant, F. R. (1989). Cherche konnen: science and literacy in language minority classrooms (No. 7305). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek & Newman.Google Scholar

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1988). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V., & Rupert, L. J. (1993). The authority of cultural tools in a sociocultural approach to mediated agency. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (in press). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education.

Wineburg, S., & Grossman, P. (2001). Affect and effect in cognitive approaches to instruction. In Carver, S. & Klahr, D. (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 475–488). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Wortham, S. (2004). The interdependence of social identification and learning. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 715–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yamakawa, Y., Forman, E., & Ansell, E. (2009). Role of positioning: The role of positioning in constructing an identity in a third grade mathematics classroom. In Kumpulainen, K., Hmelo-Silver, C. E. & César, M. (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction: Methodologies in action (pp. 179–202). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar