Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T04:31:46.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Natural Cycle and Minimal Stimulation IVF

from Section 2 - Stimulation for IVF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2019

By
Jacqueline R. Ho  and
Richard J. Paulson
Edited by
Gabor Kovacs ,
Anthony Rutherford  and
David K. Gardner
Gabor Kovacs
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Anthony Rutherford
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
David K. Gardner
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
How to Prepare the Egg and Embryo to Maximize IVF Success , pp. 49 - 58
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Trounson, AO, Leeton, JF, Wood, C, Webb, J, Kovacs, G. The investigation of idiopathic infertility by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1980 November;34(5): 431–8.Google Scholar
Jones, HW, Jones, GS, Andrews, MC et al. The program for in vitro fertilization at Norfolk. Fertil Steril. 1982 July;38(1):14–21.sGoogle Scholar
Foulot, H, Ranoux, C, Dubuisson, JB et al. In vitro fertilization without ovarian stimulation: a simplified protocol applied in 80 cycles. Fertil Steril. 1989 October;52(4): 617–21.Google Scholar
Paulson, RJ, Sauer, MV, Francis, MM, Macaso, TM, Lobo, RA. In vitro fertilization in unstimulated cycles: the University of Southern California experience. Fertil Steril. 1992 February;57(2): 290–3.Google Scholar
Pelinck, MJ, Hoek, A, Simons, AHM, Heineman, MJ. Efficacy of natural cycle IVF: a review of the literature. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(2): 129–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meldrum, DR, Rivier, J, Garzo, G et al. Successful pregnancies with unstimulated cycle oocyte donation using an antagonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Fertil Steril. 1994;61: 556–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulson, RJ, Sauer, MV, Lobo, RA. Addition of a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and exogenous gonadotropins to unstimulated in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles: Physiologic observations and preliminary experience. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994;11:28–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filicori, M, Cognigni, GE, Gameberini, E et al. Efficacy of low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin alone to complete controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:394–401.Google Scholar
Martins, WP, Vieira, AD, Figueiredo, JB, Nastri, CO. FSH replaced by low-dose hCG in the late follicular phase versus continued FSH for assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD010042.Google Scholar
Paulson, RJ, Chung, K, Quaas, AM et al. Low dose HCG alone can complete follicle maturity: successful application to modified natural cycle IVF. Fertil Steril. 2016 May;105(5): 1228–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teramoto, S, Osada, H, Sato, Y, Shozu, M. Nondominant small follicles are a promising source of mature oocytes in modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2016 July;106(1): 113–18.Google Scholar
Tang-Pedersen, M, Westergaard, LG, Erb, K, Mikkelsen, AL. Combination of IVF and IVM in naturally cycling women. Repro Biomed Online 2012 January;24(1):47–53.Google Scholar
Thornton, MH, Francisco, MM, Paulson, RJ. Immature oocyte retrieval: lessons from unstimulated IVF cycles. Fertil Steril. 1998 October;70(4): 647–50.Google Scholar
Gordon, JD, DiMattina, M, Reh, A et al. Utilization and success rates of unstimulated in vitro fertilization in the United States: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database. Fertil Steril. 2013 August;100(2): 392–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaulov, T, Velez, MP, Buzaglo, K, Phillips, SJ, Kadoch, IJ. Outcomes of 1503 cycles of modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization: a single-institution experience. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32: 1043–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgia, F, Sbracia, M, Schimberni, M et al. A controlled trial of natural cycle versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog flare cycles in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004 June;81(6): 1542–7.Google Scholar
Kim, CH, Kim, SR, Cheon, YP et al. Minimal stimulation using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone versus GnRH antagonist multiple-dose protocol in low responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2009 December;92(6): 2082–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimberni, M, Morgia, F, Colabianchi, J et al. Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization in poor responder patients: a survey of 500 consecutive cycles. Fertil Steril. 2009 October;92(4):1297–1301.Google Scholar
Mak, W, Kondapalli, LA, Celia, G et al. Natural cycle IVF reduces the risk of low birthweight infants compared with conventional stimulated IVF. Hum Reprod 2016;31(4):789–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nargund, G, Fauser, BC, Macklon, NS et al. Rotterdam ISMAAR consensus group on terminology for ovarian stimulation for IVF. Human Reprod. 2007;22: 2801–4.Google Scholar
Heijnen, EM, Eijkemans, MJ, De Klerk, C et al. A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilization: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2007 March;369(9563): 743–9.Google Scholar
Youssef, MA, van Wely, M, Al-Inany, H et al. van der Veen F. A mild ovarian stimulation strategy in women with poor ovarian reserve undergoing IVF: a multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial. Hum Reprod. 2017 January;32(1): 112–18.Google Scholar
Drakopoulos, P, Blockeel, C, Stoop, D et al. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Human Reprod. 31(2): 370–6.Google Scholar
Paulson, RJ, Sauer, MV, Lobo RA: Embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: Importance of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:870.Google Scholar
Sunkara, SK, Rittenberg, V, Raine-Fenning, N et al. Association between the number of eggs an live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400,135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(7): 1768–74.Google Scholar
Steward, RG, Lan, L, Shah, AA et al. Oocyte number is a predictor for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and live birth: an analysis of 256,381 in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014 April;101(4): 967–73.Google Scholar
Baker, VL, Brown, MB, Luke, B, Smith, GW, Ireland, JJ. Gonadotropin dose is negatively correlated with live birth rate: analysis of more than 650,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertil Steril. 2015 November;104(5): 1145–52.Google Scholar
Baart, EB, Martini, E, Eijkemans, MJ et al. Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized control trial. Hum Reprod. 2007 April;22(4): 980–8.Google Scholar
Labarta, E, Bosch, E, Alamá, P et al. Moderate ovarian stimulation does not increase the incidence of human embryo chromosomal abnormalities in in vitro fertilization cycles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 October;97(10):E1987–94.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×