Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T19:24:15.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Attention management for self-regulated learning: AtGentSchool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

Claudia Roda
Affiliation:
The American University of Paris, France
Get access

Summary

This chapter addresses how an attention-management system can provide personalized support for self-regulated learning and what the effects of this support are on learning. An attention-management system can provide personalized support by capturing and interpretating information from the student's environment. A framework is proposed that will interpret the information and provide dynamic scaffolding for the learner. The essential elements are diagnosing, calibrating and fading scaffolds to the context of the learner. An intervention model supports self-regulated learning processes. In two studies, we have found evidence that an attention-management system can effectively give form to dynamic scaffolding. Dynamic scaffolding has a small- to medium-sized effect on students' performance and a small effect on students' metacognitive knowledge acquisition.

Introduction

E-learning has incrementally changed education in recent decades. Many new tools and instruments have been introduced to support existing educational practices. Yet only on a small scale have we seen transformative processes in schools. The large changes which have taken place in other sectors have not yet been achieved in education. This can partially be explained by the fact that e-learning solutions are not yet flexible enough to cater for learners' individual needs and demands. We see personalization in many sectors today, but education still seems to hold on to the ‘one size fits all’ paradigm, even though we know that personalized education is more effective than standardized education (Bloom 1984).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahissar, M., and Hochstein, S. 1993. Attentional control of early perceptual learning, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90(12): 5718–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ainley, M., and Patrick, L. 2006. Measuring self-regulated learning processes through tracking patterns of student interaction with achievement activities, Review of Educational Psychology 18: 267–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azevedo, R., and Hadwin, A. F. 2005. Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for design of computer-based scaffolding, Instructional Science 33: 367–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannert, M. 2006. Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia, Journal of Educational Computing Research 4: 359–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, B. 1984. The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring, Educational Researcher 13: 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boekaerts, M. 1999. Motivated learning: Studying student * situation transactional units, European Journal of Psychology of Education 14(4): 41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, M. M., and Wolfe, J. 2001. Visual attention, in Goldstein, E. B. (ed.), Blackwell's Handbook of Perception. Oxford:Blackwell: 272–310Google Scholar
Driver, J. 2001. A selective review of selective attention research from the past century, British Journal of Psychology 92: 53–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flavell, J. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry, American Psychologist 34: 906–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, R. 1987. Metacognition and Reading Comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. 2001. Learner experience and efficiency of instructional guidance, Educational Psychology 21: 5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching, Educational Psychologist 4: 75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, X., and Lehman, J. D. 1999. Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36: 837–483.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molenaar, I. 2003. Knowledge exchange from citizens to learners through online collaboration. In D. Lassner and C. McNaught (eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2003, Chesapeake, VA: AACE: 894–9Google Scholar
Molenaar, I., and Roda, C. 2008. Attention management for dynamic and adaptive scaffolding, Pragmatics and Cognition 16(2): 225–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsell, S. 2003. Task switching, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(3): 134–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, T. 1996. Consciousness and metacognition, American Psychologist 51: 102–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, M. 1980. Orienting of attention, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32: 3–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, M. 1982. Cumulative development of attention theory, American Psychologist 37: 168–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puntambekar, S., and Hübscher, R. 2005. Tools for scaffolding students in a complex environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist 40(1): 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roda, C., and Nabeth, T. 2007. Supporting attention in learning environments: Attention support services, and information management, in Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2007, Crete: 277–91Google Scholar
Roda, C., and Thomas, J. 2006. Attention aware systems: Theories, applications, and research agenda, Computers in Human Behavior 22(4): 557–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R. 1991. Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research (rev. edn). Newbury Park, CA: SageCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, E. R., Aslin, R. N., and Newport, E. L. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants, Science 274(5294): 1926–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seger, C. A. 1994. Implicit learning, Psychological Bulletin 115(2): 163–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seitz, A., and Watanabe, T. 2005. A unified model for perceptual learning, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(7): 329–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanks, D. R., Rowland, L. A., and Ranger, M. S. 2005. Attentional load and implicit sequence learning, Psychological Research 69(5): 369–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spector, A., and Biederman, I. 1976. Mental set and mental shift revisited, American Journal of Psychology 89(4): 669–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toro, J. M., Sinnett, S., and Soto-Faraco, S. 2005. Speech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention, Cognition 97(2): B25–B34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veenman, M. V. J., Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., and Afflerbach, P. 2006. Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations, Metacognition and Learning 1: 3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J., and Ross, G. 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 17: 89–100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yantis, S. 1998. Control of visual attention, in Pashler, H. (ed.), Attention. London: University College London Press: 223–56Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J. 2002. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview, Theory into Practice 42(2): 64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×