Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T04:24:46.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Human–Wildlife Conflicts and the Need to Include Coexistence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2019

By
Beatrice Frank  and
Jenny A. Glikman
Edited by
Beatrice Frank ,
Jenny A. Glikman  and
Silvio Marchini
Beatrice Frank
Affiliation:
Capital Regional District of Victoria Regional Parks
Jenny A. Glikman
Affiliation:
Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global
Silvio Marchini
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo
Get access

Summary

To explore the linkages between social meanings of wildlife and human–wildlife interactions, an animal geography perspective of the rationalizations used by Western societies to define nature and wildlife over time is presented. This helps illustrate the ways individuals, social groups and societies organize, perceive and communicate about wildlife. How societies view wildlife determine the outcome of any human–wildlife interaction, and depending on the context, translates into a coexistence, neutral or conflict situation. This chapter explores the meaning of conflict and coexistence, discusses the conflict-to-coexistence continuum and sets the stage for the following chapters of the book, which focus on turning conflict into coexistence.
Type
Chapter
Information
Human–Wildlife Interactions
Turning Conflict into Coexistence
 , pp. 1 - 19
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.6 References

Barua, M., Bhagwat, S. A. & Jadhav, S. (2013). The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: Health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biological Conservation, 157, 309–16.Google Scholar
Berger, L. R. & McGraw, W. S. (2007). Further evidence for eagle predation of, and feeding damage on, the Taung child. South African Journal of Science, 103, 496–8.Google Scholar
Bhatia, S., Redpath, S. M., Suryawanshi, K. & Mishra, C. (2017). The relationship between religion and attitudes toward large carnivores in Northern India? Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22(1), 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisi, J., Liukkonen, T., Mykra, S., Pohja-Mykra, M. & Kurki, S. (2010). The good bad wolf–wolf evaluation reveals the roots of the Finnish wolf conflict. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 56, 771–9.Google Scholar
Blackwell, B. F., DeVault, T. L., Fernandez-Juricic, E., Gese, E. M., Gilbert-Norton, L. & Breck, S. W. (2017). No single solution: Application of behavioural principles in mitigating human–wildlife conflict. Animal Behaviour, 120, 245–54.Google Scholar
Browne-Nuñez, C., Treves, A., MacFarland, D., Voyles, Z. & Turng, C. (2015). Tolerance of wolves in Wisconsin: A mixed-methods examination of policy effects on attitudes and behavioural inclinations. Biological Conservation, 189, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruskotter, J. T. & Fulton, D. C. (2012). Will hunters steward wolves? A comment on Treves and Martin. Society & Natural Resources, 25, 97–102.Google Scholar
Bruskotter, J. T., Singh, A., Fulton, D. C. & Slagle, K. (2015). Assessing tolerance for wildlife: Clarifying relations between concepts and measures. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20, 255–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruskotter, J. T. & Wilson, R. S. (2014). Determining where the wild things will be: Using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conservation Letters, 7, 158–65.Google Scholar
Carter, N. H. & Linnell, J. D. C. (2016). Co-adaptation is key to coexisting with large carnivores. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(8), 575–8.Google Scholar
Chapron, G. & López-Bao, J. V. (2016). Coexistence with large carnivores informed by community ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(8), 578–80.Google Scholar
Conover, M. R. (2002). Resolving Human–Wildlife Conflicts. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Creager, A. N. H. & Jordan, W. C. (2002). The Animal/Human Boundary: Historical Perspectives (Studies in Comparative History). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Cronon, W. (1995). The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In Cronon, W., ed., Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. New York, NY: W.W. Norton, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
Darimont, C. T., Fox, C. H., Bryan, H. M. & Reimchen, T. E. (2015). Human impacts: The unique ecology of human predators. Science, 349(6250), 858–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dayer, A. A., Williams, A., Cosbar, E. & Racey, M. (2017). Blaming threatened species: Media portrayal of human–wildlife conflict. Oryx, 1–8.Google Scholar
Dickman, A. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict: The importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation, 13, 458–66.Google Scholar
Dickman, A. J. & Hazzah, L. (2016). Money, myths and man-eaters: Complexities of human–wildlife conflict. In Angelici, F. M., ed., Problematic Wildlife: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 339–56.Google Scholar
Dorresteijn, I., Milcu, A. I., Leventon, J., Hanspach, J. & Fischer, J. (2016). Social factors mediating human–carnivore coexistence: Understanding thematic strands influencing coexistence in Central Romania. Ambio, 45(4), 490–500.Google Scholar
Draheim, M. M., Madden, F., McCarthy, J.-B. & Parsons, E. C. M. (2015). Human–Wildlife Conflict: Complexity in the Marine Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eklund, A. López-Bao, J. V. Tourani, M., Chapron, G. & Frank, F. (2017). Limited evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce livestock predation by large carnivores. Scientific Reports, 7, 2097.Google Scholar
Emel, J., Wilbert, C. & Wolch, J. (2002). Animal geographies. Society & Animals, 10(4), 407–12.Google Scholar
Evernden, N. (1992). The Social Creation of Nature. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. (2016). Whose conflict is it anyway? Mobilizing research to save lives. Oryx, 50(3), 377–8.Google Scholar
Frank, B. (2016). Human–wildlife conflicts, the need to include tolerance and coexistence: An introductory comment. Society & Natural Resources, 29(6), 738–43.Google Scholar
Frank, B. & Bath, A. J. (2012). Does it matter where people live? Wildlife management across protected area boundaries. Journal of Science & Management of Protected Areas (SAMPAA), 1, 12–21.Google Scholar
Gebresenbet, F., Baraki, B., Yirga, G., Sillero-Zubiri, C. & Bauer, H. (2017). A culture of tolerance: Coexisting with large carnivores in the Kafa Highlands, Ethiopia. Oryx, 52(4), 751–60.Google Scholar
Glikman, J. A., Vaske, J. J., Bath, A. J., Ciucci, P. and Boitani, L. (2012). Residents’ support for wolf and bear conservation: The moderating influence of knowledge. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 58, 295–302.Google Scholar
Goodale, K., Parsons, G. J. & Sherren, K. (2015). The nature of the nuisance – damage or threat – determines how perceived monetary costs and cultural benefits influence farmer tolerance of wildlife. Diversity, 7, 318–41.Google Scholar
Gupta, N., Rajvanshi, A. & Badola, R. (2017). Climate change and human–wildlife conflicts in the Indian Himalayan biodiversity hotspot. Current Science, 113(5), 846–7.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. G., Briggs-Gonzalez, V. S. & Mazzotti, F. J. (2017). Conservation payments in a social context: Determinants of tolerance and behavioural intentions towards wild cats in northern Belize. Oryx, 51(4), 730–41.Google Scholar
Hazzah, L., Borgerhoff, M. M. & Frank, L. (2009). Lions and warriors: Social factors underlying declining African lion populations and the effect of incentive-based management in Kenya. Biological Conservation, 142(11), 2428–37.Google Scholar
Hazzah, L., Dolrenry, S., Naughton, L., Edwards, C. T. T., Mwebi, O., Kearney, F. & Frank, L. (2014). Efficacy of two lion conservation programs in Maasailand, Kenya. Conservation Biology, 28, 851–60.Google Scholar
Hill, C. (2017). Introduction. Complex problems: Using a biosocial approach to understanding human–wildlife interactions. In Hill, C. M., Webber, A. D. & Priston, N. E. C., eds., Understanding Conflicts about Wildlife: A Biosocial Approach. Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (1994). From trust to domination: An alternative history of human–animal relations. In Manning, A. & Serpell, J., eds., Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Inskip, C., Carter, N., Riley, S., Roberts, T. & MacMillan, D. (2016). Toward human–carnivore coexistence: Understanding tolerance for tigers in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0145913.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. & Keal, A. (2004). The Adirondack Atlas. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (2008). Beyond the clearing: Towards a dwelt animal geography. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 633–49.Google Scholar
Kansky, R., Kidd, M. & Knight, A. T. (2016). A wildlife tolerance model and case study for understanding human–wildlife conflicts. Biological Conservation, 201, 137–45.Google Scholar
Karanth, K. U. & Chellam, R. (2009). Carnivore conservation at the crossroads. Oryx, 43, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, J. (2000). Natural Enemies: People–Wildlife Conflicts in Anthropological Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kruuk, H. (2002). History of a conflict: Carnivores and the first hominids. In Kruuk, H., Hunter and Hunted: Relationship between Carnivores and People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–15.Google Scholar
Kueffer, C. & Kaiser-Bunbury, C. N. (2014). Reconciling conflicting perspectives for biodiversity conservation in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 12, 131–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee-Thorp, J., Thackeray, J. F. & Van der Merwe, N. (2000). The hunters and the hunted revisited. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 565–76.Google Scholar
Leighly, J. (1963).Land and Life: A Selection from the Writings of Carl Ortwin Sauer. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lindsey, P. A., Havemann, C. P., Lines, R., Palazy, L., Price, A. E., Retief, T. A., Rhebergen, T. & Van der Waal, C. (2013). Determinants of persistence and tolerance of carnivores on Namibian ranches: Implications for conservation on Southern African private lands. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liordos, V., Kontsiotis, V. J., Georgari, M., Baltzi, K. & Baltzi, I. (2017). Public acceptance of management methods under different human–wildlife conflict scenarios. Science of the Total Environment, 579, 685–93.Google Scholar
Logsdon, R. A., Kalcic, M. M., Trybula, E. M., Chaubey, I. & Frankenberger, J. R. (2015). Ecosystem services and Indiana agriculture: Farmers’ and conservationists’ perceptions. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 11(3), 264–82.Google Scholar
López-Bao, J. V., Kaczensky, P., Linnell, J. D. C., Boitani, L. & Chapron, G. (2015). Carnivore coexistence: Wilderness not required. Science, 348, 871–72.Google Scholar
Lute, M. L. & Gore, M. L. (2014). Stewardship as a path to cooperation? Exploring the role of identity in intergroup conflict among Michigan wolf stakeholders. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19(3), 267–79.Google Scholar
Madden, F. (2004a). Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: Global perspectives on local efforts to address human–wildlife conflict. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 9, 247–57.Google Scholar
Madden, F. (2004b). Can traditions of tolerance help minimize conflict? An exploration of cultural factors supporting human–wildlife coexistence. Policy Matters, 13, 234–41.Google Scholar
Madden, F. (2008). The growing conflict between humans and wildlife: Law and policy as contributing and mitigating factors. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 11, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, F. & McQuinn, B. (2014). Conservation’s blind spot: The case for conflict transformation in wildlife conservation. Biological Conservation, 178, 97–106.Google Scholar
Madden, F. & McQuinn, B. (2017). Conservation conflict transformation: Addressing the missing link in wildlife conservation. In Hill, C. M., Webber, A. D. & Priston, N. E. C., eds., Understanding Conflicts about Wildlife: A Biosocial Approach. Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 148–69.Google Scholar
Majić, A., Marino, A., Huber, D. & Bunnefeld, N. (2011). Dynamics of public attitudes toward bears and the role of bear hunting in Croatia. Biological Conservation, 144(12), 3018–27.Google Scholar
Manfredo, M. J. & Dayer, A. A. (2004). Concepts for exploring the social aspects of human–wildlife conflict in a global context. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 9, 1–20.Google Scholar
Manning, A. & Serpell, J. (1994). Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marchini, S. & Macdonald, D. W. (2012). Predicting ranchers’ intention to kill jaguars: Case studies in Amazonia and Pantanal. Biological Conservation, 147, 213–21.Google Scholar
McIntyre, N., Moore, J. & Yuan, M. (2008). A place-based, values-centered approach to managing recreation on Canadian crown lands. Society & Natural Resources, 21, 657–70.Google Scholar
Morehouse, A. T. & Boyce, M. S. (2017). Troublemaking carnivores: Conflicts with humans in a diverse assemblage of large carnivores. Ecology and Society, 22(3), art. 4.Google Scholar
Morzillo, A., de Beurs, K. & Martin-Mikle, C. (2014). A conceptual framework to evaluate human–wildlife interactions within coupled human and natural systems. Ecology & Society, 19, art. 44.Google Scholar
Nash, R. (2001). Wilderness and the American Mind, 3rd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. P., Bruskotter, J. T., Vucetich, J. A. & Chapron, G. (2016). Emotions and the ethics of consequence in conservation decisions: Lessons from Cecil the Lion. Conservation Letters, 9(4), 302–6.Google Scholar
Nyhus, P. J. (2016). Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annual Review of Environment & Resources, 41, 143–71.Google Scholar
Oelschlaeger, M. (1991). The Idea of Wilderness: From Prehistory to the Age of Ecology. Binghamton, NY: Vail-Ballou Press.Google Scholar
Ogra, M. V. (2008). Human–wildlife conflict and gender in protected area borderlands: A case study of costs, perceptions, and vulnerabilities from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India. Geoforum, 39, 1408–22.Google Scholar
Oliver, P. & Johnston, H. (2000). What a good idea! Ideology and frames in social movement research. Mobilization: An International Journal, 4, 37–54.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. N., Birckhead, J. L., Leong, K., Peterson, M. J. & Peterson, T. R. (2010). Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict. Conservation Letters, 3, 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philo, C. & Wilbert, C. (2000). Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Pooley, S., Barua, M., Beinart, W., Dickman, A., Holmes, G., Lorimer, J., Loveridge, A. J., Macdonald, D. W., Marvin, G., Redpath, S., Sillero-Zubiri, C., Zimmermann, A. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2017). An interdisciplinary review of current and future approaches to improving human–predator relations. Conservation Biology, 31, 513–23.Google Scholar
Price, J. (2000). Flight Maps: Adventures with Nature in Modern America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ravenelle, J. & Nyhus, P. J. (2017). Global patterns and trends in human–wildlife conflict compensation. Conservation Biology, 31(6), 1247–56.Google Scholar
Redpath, S. M., Bhatia, S. & Young, J. C. (2015). Tilting at wildlife – reconsidering human–wildlife conflict. Oryx, 49(2), 222–5.Google Scholar
Ripple, W. J., Estes, J. A., Beschta, R. L., Wilmers, C. C., Ritchie, E. G., Hebblewhite, M., Berger, J., Elmhagen, B., Letnic, M., Nelson, P. M., Schmitz, O. J., Smith, D. W., Wallach, A. D. & Wirsing, A. J. (2014). Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science, 343, 1241484.Google Scholar
Rothman, H. (2000). Saving the Planet: The American Response to the Environment in the Twentieth Century. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.Google Scholar
Senthilkumar, K., Mathialagan, P., Sabarathnam, V. E. & Manivannan, C. (2017). Development of perception test for human–wildlife conflict. International Journal of Current Microbiology & Applied Sciences, 6(6), 817–24.Google Scholar
Skogen, K. & Krange, O. (2003). A wolf at the gate: The anti-carnivore alliance and the symbolic construction of community. Sociologia Ruralis, 43, 309–25.Google Scholar
Songhurst, A. (2017). Measuring human–wildlife conflicts: Comparing insights from different monitoring approaches. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 41(2), 351–61.Google Scholar
Soulsbury, C. D. & White, P. C. L. (2015). Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: A review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities. Wildlife Research, 42, 541–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sponarski, C. C., Vaske, J. J. & Bath, A. J. (2015). Differences in management action acceptability for coyotes in a National Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 39, 239–47.Google Scholar
Tovey, H. (2003). Theorizing nature and society in sociology: The invisibility of animals. Sociologia Ruralis, 43(3), 196–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treves, A. (2012). Tolerant attitudes reflect an intent to steward: A reply to Bruskotter and Fulton. Society & Natural Resources, 25, 103–4.Google Scholar
Treves, A. & Bruskotter, J. (2014). Tolerance for predatory wildlife. Science, 344, 476–7.Google Scholar
van Eeden, L. M., Crowther, M. S., Dickman, C. R., Macdonald, D. W., Ripple, W. J., Ritchie, E. G. & Newsome, T. M. (2018). Managing conflict between large carnivores and livestock. Conservation Biology, 32, 26–34.Google Scholar
van Heel, B. F., Boerboom, A. M., Fliervoet, J. M., Lenders, H. J. R. & van den Born, R. J. G. (2017). Analysing stakeholders’ perceptions of wolf, lynx and fox in a Dutch riverine area. Biodiversity & Conservation, 26, 1723–43.Google Scholar
Varga, D. (2009). Babes in the woods: Wilderness aesthetics in children’s stories and toys, 1830–1915. Society & Animals, 17, 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. C. L. & Ward, A. I. (2010). Interdisciplinary approaches for the management of existing and emerging human–wildlife conflicts. Wildlife Research, 37, 623–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolch, J. & Emel, J. (1998). Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature–Culture Borderlands. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Woodroffe, R. (2000). Predators and people: Using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores. Animal Conservation, 3, 165–73.Google Scholar
Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S. & Rabinowitz, A. (2005). People and Wildlife, Conflict or Coexistence? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, J. C., Marzano, M., White, R. M., McCracken, D. I., Redpath, S. M., Carss, D. N., Quine, C. P. & Watt, A. D. (2010). The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts: Characteristics and management strategies. Biodiversity & Conservation, 19, 3973–90.Google Scholar
Yurco, K., King, B., Young, K. R. & Crews, K. A. (2017). Human–wildlife interactions and environmental dynamics in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Society & Natural Resources, 30(9), 1112–1126.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A., Walpole, M. J. & Leader-Williams, N. (2005). Cattle ranchers’ attitudes to conflicts with jaguar Panthera onca in the Pantanal of Brazil. Oryx, 39(4), 406–412.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×