Al-Khasawneh, A 2015. ‘Foreword’, in Savarian, A, Fontanelli, F, Baker, R and Tsevelekos, V (eds), Procedural Fairness in International Courts and Tribunals (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law)Google Scholar

Alexandrov, S A and Carlson, M 2010. ‘The Opportunity to Be Heard: Accommodating Amicus Curiae Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in Arias, D and Fernández-Ballesteros, M (eds), Liber Amicorum: Bernardo Cremades (Madrid: La Ley)Google Scholar

Amado, J, Kern, J and Rodríguez, M 2018. Arbitrating the Conduct of International Investors (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Antonopoulos, C 2011. Counterclaims before the International Court of Justice (The Hague: TMC Asser Press)Google Scholar

Atanansova, D, Benoit, A M and Ostransky, J 2014. ‘Legal Framework for Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ 31 J Int’l Arb 357Google Scholar

Bain, E 2018. ‘When Some Are More Equal than Others: The Need for a More Substantive Conception of “Equality of the Parties” in Investment Arbitration’, in Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2015–2016 (New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Bantekas, I 2020a. ‘Equal Treatment of Parties in International Commercial Arbitration’ 69 ICLQ 991CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bantekas, I 2020b. ‘Article 18: Equal Treatment of Parties’, in Bantekas, I, Ortolani, P, Ali, S, Gomez, M A and Polkinghome, M (eds), UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: A Commentary (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beechey, J 2019. ‘The Pandora’s Box of Third-Party Funding: Some Practical Suggestions for Arbitrators in Light of Recent Developments’ 20 ICCA Congress Series 558Google Scholar

Berger, K P and Jensen, J O 2016. ‘Due Process Paranoia and the Procedural Judgment Rule: A Safe Harbour for Procedural Management Decisions by International Arbitrators’ 32 Arb Int’l 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernadini, P 2017. ‘Reforming Investor–State Dispute Settlement: The Need to Balance Both Parties’ Interests’ 32 ICSID Rev – FILJ 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, R D, Crawford, J and Reisman, W M 2014. Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, Materials and Commentary, 2nd edn (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International)Google Scholar

Blair, C and Gojković, E V 2018. ‘WikiLeaks and Beyond: Discerning an International Standard for the Admissibility of Illegally Obtained Evidence’ 33 ICSID Rev – FILJ 235Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, L 2018. ‘Changes in the Balance of Rights and Obligations: Towards Investor Responsibilization’, in El Ghadban, T, Mazuy, C and Senegacnik, A (eds), La Protection des investissements étrangers, vers une reaffirmation de l’Etat? Actes du colloque du 2 juin 2017 (Paris: Pedone)Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, L 2015. ‘Transparency in Investor–State Arbitration: An Incremental Approach’ 2 BCDR Int’l Arb Rev 59Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, L 2005. ‘Making the Proceedings Public and Allowing Third-Party Interventions: Are the New Generation Bilateral Investment Treaties (US, Canada) Bifurcating Investment Arbitration from International Commercial Arbitration?’ 6 JWIT 105Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, L 2004. ‘Transparency and “Amicus Curiae” Briefs’ 5 JWIT 333Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, L, Bonnin, V, Kaufmann-Kohler, G and Mbengue, M M 2006. ‘Consolidation of Proceedings in Investment Arbitration: How Can Multiple Proceedings Arising from the Same or Related Situations Be Handled Efficiently?’ Final Report on the Geneva Colloquium held on 22 April 2006, 21 ICSID Rev – FILJ 59Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, L and Mbengue, M M 2003. ‘The Amici Curiae and the WTO Dispute Settlement System: The Doors Are Open’ 2 LPICT 205Google Scholar

Bonnitcha, J, Poulsen, L and Waibel, M, 2017. The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Boon, K E 2018. ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration: Making a Place for Small Claims’ 19 JWIT 667Google Scholar

Born, G 2014. International Commercial Arbitration, 2nd edn (Alphen aan den Rijn:Kluwer)Google Scholar

Born, G 2011. ‘The US Supreme Court and Class Action Arbitration: A Tragedy of Errors’ (1 July), www.kluwerarbitrationblog.comGoogle Scholar

Born, G 2009. International Commercial Arbitration, 1st edn (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer)Google Scholar

Bottini, G, Titi, C, Pérez-Aznar, F, Chaisse, J, Jovanovic, M and Puigdemont Sola, O 2020. ‘Excessive Costs and Recoverability of Costs Awards in Investment Arbitration’ 21 JWIT 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourgeois, V, Eyskens, W, Fernandez-Bertier, M and Stoyanov, M 2018. ‘Procedural Interplay between Investment Arbitration and Criminal Proceedings in the Context of Corruption Allegations’ Belgian Review of Arbitration 7Google Scholar

Broches, A 1972. ‘The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States’ 136 Recueil des Cours 331Google Scholar

Bronckers, M 2015. ‘Is Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Superior to Litigation before Domestic Courts?’ 18 JIEL 655CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brower, C N and Kumar, S P 2015. ‘Investomercial Arbitration: Whence Cometh It? What Is It? Whither Goeth It?’ 30 ICSID Rev – FILJ 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brower, C N and Rosenberg, C B 2013. ‘The Death of the Two-Headed Nightingale: Why the Paulsson-van den Berg Presumption that Party-Appointed Arbitrators Are Untrustworthy Is Wrongheaded’ 29 Arb Int’l 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown de Vejar, K and Baldwin, C 2019. ‘The Economics of Access: Systemic Imbalances in ISDS’ 20 ICCA Congress Series 520Google Scholar

Bubrowski, H 2013. ‘Balancing IIA Arbitration through the Use of Counterclaims’, in Mestral, A de and Lévesque, C (eds), Improving International Investment Agreements (Abingdon: Routledge)Google Scholar

Bungenberg, M and Reinisch, A 2019. ‘Design and Implementation of a Two-Tiered MIC’, in From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court: Options Regarding the Institutionalization of Investor–State Dispute Settlement, European Yearbook of International Economic Law Series, 2nd edn (Berlin: Springer)Google Scholar

Carlston, K 1946. The Process of International Arbitration (New York: Columbia University Press)Google Scholar

Caron, D and Caplan, L 2013. The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: A Commentary, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Chaisse, J, Choukroune, L and Jusoh, S (eds) 2020. Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Singapore: Springer)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaisse, J and Sejko, D 2016. ‘Investor–State Arbitration Distorted: When the Claimant Is a State’, in Choukroune, L (ed), Judging the State in International Trade and Investment Law: Sovereignty Modern, the Law and the Economics (Singapore: Springer)Google Scholar

Cheng, B 1953. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (London: Stevens)Google Scholar

Cleis, M N 2017. The Independence and Impartiality of ICSID Arbitrators: Current Case Law, Alternative Approaches, and Improvement Suggestions (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Collins, Lord (gen ed), 2012. Dicey, Morris & Collins on the Conflict of Laws, 15th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

Crawford, J R 2015. ‘Challenges to Arbitrators in ICSID Arbitration’, in Caron, D, Schill, S W, Cohen Smutny, A and Triantafilou, E E (eds), Practising Virtue: Inside International Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Crawford, J R 2017. ‘The Ideal Arbitrator: Does One Size Fit All?’ 32 Am U Int’l LR 1003Google Scholar

Croft, C, Kee, C and Waincymer, J 2013. A Guide to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Darwazeh, N and Leleu, A 2016. ‘Disclosure and Security for Costs or How to Address Imbalances Created by Third-Party Funding’ 33 J Int’l Arb 125Google Scholar

De Brabandere, E 2012. ‘Individuals in Advisory Proceedings before the International Court of Justice: Equality of the Parties and the Court’s Discretionary Authority’ 11 LPICT 253Google Scholar

De Brabandere, E and Lepeltak, J 2012. ‘Third-Party Funding in International Investment Arbitration’ 27 ICSID Rev – FILJ 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Nanteuil, A 2018. ‘Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration: Old Questions, New Answers?’ 17 LPICT 374Google Scholar

Della Cananea, G 2016. ‘Audi alteram partem’ in Due Process of Law beyond the State (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Di Rosa, P 2019. ‘Challenges for Counsel in the Representation of States and State-Owned Entities in International Arbitration: A Practitioner’s Perspective’ 20 ICCA Congress Series 607Google Scholar

Dolzer, R and Schreuer, C 2012. Principles of International Investment Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Douglas, Z 2009. The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

El-Hosseny, F 2018. Civil Society in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Status and Prospects (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

European Federation for Investment Law and Arbitration (EFILA) 2015. ‘A Response to the Criticism against ISDS’ (17 May), http://efila.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/EFILA_in_response_to_the-criticism_of_ISDS_final_draft.pdfGoogle Scholar

Fach Gómez, K 2019. Key Duties of International Investment Arbitrators: A Transnational Study of Legal and Ethical Dilemmas (Cham: Springer Nature)Google Scholar

Feldman, M 2016. ‘State-Owned Enterprises as Claimants in International Investment Arbitration’ 31 ICSID Rev – FILJ 24Google Scholar

Fouret, J, Gerbay, R and Alvarez, G M (eds) 2019. The ICSID Convention, Regulations and Rules: A Practical Commentary (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franck, S D 2019. ‘Costs – Risks and Reality’, in Arbitration Costs: Myths and Realities in Investment Treaty Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Franck, T 1993. ‘Fairness in the International Legal and Institutional System’ 240 Recueil des Cours 9Google Scholar

Frignati, V 2016. ‘Ethical Implications of Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration’ 32 Arb Int’l 505Google Scholar

Gaillard, E and Savage, J (eds) 1999. Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague and Boston, MA: Kluwer Law International)Google Scholar

Giorgetti, C and Dunoff, J L 2019. ‘Ex Pluribus Unum? On the Form and Shape of a Common Code of Ethics in International Litigation’ 113 AJIL Unbound 312Google Scholar

Giorgetti, C, Ratner, S, Dunoff, J, Hamamoto, S, Nottage, L, Schill, S W and Waibel, M 2020. ‘Independence and Impartiality of Adjudicators in Investment Dispute Settlement: Assessing Challenges and Reform Options’ 21 JWIT 441Google Scholar

Goh, N 2018. ‘The Power of Tribunals to Enjoin Criminal Proceedings: A Widening Power or Converging High Bar?’ 33 ICSID Rev – FILJ 88Google Scholar

Gomez-Acebo, A 2019. ‘A Special Role of Party-Appointed Arbitrators?’ 20 ICCA Congress Series 381Google Scholar

Gottwald, E 2007. ‘Leveling the Playing Field: Is It Time for a Legal Assistance Center for Developing Nations in Investment Treaty Arbitration?’ 22 Am U Int’l LR 237Google Scholar

Gomula, J 1991. ‘The International Court of Justice and Administrative Tribunals of International Organizations’ 13 Mich JIL 83Google Scholar

Gross, L 1958. ‘Participation of Individuals in Advisory Proceedings before the International Court of Justice: Question of Equality between the Parties’ 52 AJIL 16Google Scholar

Hanotiau, B 2020. Complex Arbitrations: Multi-Party, Multi-Contract, Multi-Issue – A Comparative Study, 2nd edn (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International)Google Scholar

Hepburn, J and Kabra, R 2017. ‘India’s New Model BIT: Fit for Purpose?’ 1 Indian LR 95Google Scholar

Hoffmann, A 2018. ‘The Impact of Third-Party Funding on an ICSID Tribunal’s Decision on Security for Costs’, in Akbaba, M and Capurro, G (eds), International Challenges in Investment Arbitration (New York: Routledge)Google Scholar

Honlet, J C 2015. ‘Recent Decisions on Third-Party Funding in Investment Arbitration’ 30 ICSID Rev – FILJ 699CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ishikawa, T 2019. ‘Counterclaims and the Rule of Law in Investment Arbitration’ 113 AJIL Unbound 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaeckenbeeck, G S 1946. ‘Upper Silesia under the League of Nations’ 243 Annals AAPSS 129Google Scholar

Kao, C 2019. ‘Assessing the Rules of Appointing Arbitrators under the EU’s Investment Court System’ 27 Eur Rev 210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, G and Potestà, M 2020. Investor–State Dispute Settlement and National Courts: Current Framework and Reform Options, European Yearbook of International Economic Law (Cham: Springer)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kazazi, M 1995. Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A Study on Evidence before International Tribunals (The Hague, London and Boston: Kluwer)Google Scholar

Kessedjian, C 2020. ‘Le tiers impartial et indépendant en droit international: Juge, arbitre, médiateur, conciliateur’ 403 Recueil des Cours 49Google Scholar

Kho, S, Yanovich, A, Casey, B and Strauss, J 2017. ‘The EU TTIP Investment Court Proposal and the WTO Dispute Settlement System’ 32 ICSID Rev – FILJ 326Google Scholar

Kohen, M and Dumberry, P 2019. The Institute of International Law’s Resolution on State Succession and State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Kolb, R 2013. The International Court of Justice (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart)Google Scholar

Kolo, A 2010. ‘Witness Intimidation, Tampering and Other Related Abuses of Process in Investment Arbitration: Possible Remedies Available to the Arbitral Tribunal’ 26 Arb Int’l 43Google Scholar

Kotuby, C and Sobota, L 2017. General Principles of Law and International Due Process (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Jennings, R and Watts, A (eds) 1992. Oppenheim’s International Law, 9th edn (Oxford University Press), vol 1Google Scholar

Lalive, P and Halonen, L 2011. ‘On the Availability of Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ II Czech YBIL 141Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H 1933. The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Lixinski, L 2015. ‘The Right to a Competent Judge: Selecting, Training and Assigning International Criminal Judges’, in Savarian, A, Fontanelli, F, Baker, R and Tsevelekos, V (eds), Procedural Fairness in International Courts and Tribunals (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law)Google Scholar

Luttrell, S 2016. ‘Testing the ICSID Framework for Arbitrator Challenges’ 31 ICSID Rev – FILJ 597Google Scholar

Mackenzie, R, Malleson, K, Martin, P and Sands, P 2010. Selecting International Judges: Principle, Process and Politics (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Malmström, C (European Commissioner for Trade) 2017. ‘Reforming Investment Dispute Settlement’ (27 February), http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/february/tradoc_155393.pdfGoogle Scholar

Mani, V S 1980. International Adjudication: Procedural Aspects (The Hague, London and Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Mbengue, M M and Schacherer, S 2018. ‘Africa and the Rethinking of International Investment Law: About the Elaboration of the Pan-African Investment Code’, in Roberts, A, Stephan, P B, Verdier, P-H and Versteeg, M (eds), Comparative International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

McLachlan, C, Shore, L and Weiniger, M 2017. International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Mikhailovich Khodykin, R, Mulcahy, C and Martin Fletcher, N H 2019. A Guide to the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Moseley, S E 2019. ‘Disclosing Third-Party Funding in International Investment Arbitration’ 97 Texas LR 1181Google Scholar

Onyema, E 2019. ‘African Participation in the ICSID System: Appointment and Disqualification of Arbitrators’ 34 ICSID Rev – FILJ 365Google Scholar

Parlett, K 2011. The Individual in the International Legal System: Continuity and Change in International Law (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Paulsson, J 2013. The Idea of Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Pellet, A 2012. ‘Judicial Settlement of International Disputes’, in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Polanco, R 2019. The Return of the Home State to Investor–State Disputes: Bringing Back Diplomatic Protection? (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Poudret, J-F and Besson, S 2007. Comparative Law of International Commercial Arbitration, 2nd edn, trans S Berti and A Ponti (London: Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

Poulsen, L N S 2016. ‘States as Foreign Investors: Diplomatic Disputes and Legal Fictions’ 31 ICSID Rev – FILJ 12Google Scholar

Puig, S and Shaffer, G 2018. ‘Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law’ 112 AJIL 361Google Scholar

Ramesh, S 2020. ‘Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration: Ownership of the Claim, Consequences for Costs Orders, and Regulation’ 36 Arb Int’l 275Google Scholar

Reed, L 2017. ‘Ab(use) of Due Process: Sword vs Shield’ 33 Arb Int’l 361Google Scholar

Reinisch, A 2017. ‘The European Union and Investor–State Dispute Settlement: From Investor–State Arbitration to a Permanent Investment Court’, in de Mestral, A (ed), Second Thoughts: Investor–State Arbitration between Developed Democracies (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press)Google Scholar

Reinisch, A and Knahr, C 2008. ‘From the United Nations Administrative Tribunal to the United Nations Appeals Tribunal – Reform of the Administration of Justice System within the United Nations’ 12 Max Planck UNYB 447Google Scholar

Reinisch, A and Knahr, C 2007. ‘Transparency versus Confidentiality in International Investment Arbitration – The Biwater Gauff Compromise’ 6 LPICT 97Google Scholar

Riffel, C 2020. ‘Does Investor–State Dispute Settlement Discriminate against Nationals?’ 21 German LJ 197Google Scholar

Roberts, A 2018. ‘Incremental, Systemic, and Paradigmatic Reform of Investor–State Arbitration’ 112 AJIL 410Google Scholar

Sauvant, K P 2019. ‘An Advisory Centre on International Investment Law: Key Features’ (10 September) Academic Forum on ISDS Concept Paper 2019/14Google Scholar

Sarvarian, A, Fontanelli, F, Baker, R and Tzevelekos, V 2015. Procedural Fairness in International Courts and Tribunals (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law)Google Scholar

Schabas, W 2015. The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Schneiderman, D 2017. ‘Listening to Investors (and Others): Audi Alteram Partem and the Future of International Investment Law’, in de Mestral, A (ed), Second Thoughts: Investor State Arbitration between Developed Democracies (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press)Google Scholar

Schreuer, C, Malintoppi, L, Reinisch, A and Sinclair, A 2009. The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Schwebel, S M 2016. ‘The Proposals of the European Commission for Investment Protection and an Investment Court System’ (17 May), http://isdsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/05/THEPROPOSALSOFTHEEUROPEANCOMMISSION.pdfGoogle Scholar

Schwebel, S M 1999. ‘National Judges and Judges Ad Hoc of the International Court of Justice’ 48 ICLQ 889Google Scholar

Schwieder, R W 2018. ‘Legal Aid and Investment Treaty Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Advisory Centre on WTO Law and Investment Experiences’ 19 JWIT 628Google Scholar

Semertzi, A 2014. ‘The Preclusion of Direct Effect in the Recently Concluded EU Free Trade Agreements’ 51 CMLR 1125Google Scholar

Sharpe, J K and Jacob, M 2018. ‘Counterclaims and State Claims’, in Beharry, C L (ed), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Shaw Kern, J 2019. ‘Investor Responsibility as Familiar Frontier’ 113 AJIL Unbound 28Google Scholar

Sheppard, A 2016. ‘The Approach of Investment Treaty Tribunals to Evidentiary Privileges’ 31 ICSID Rev – FILJ 670Google Scholar

Sourgens, F G, Duggal, K and Laird, I A, 2018. Evidence in International Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Steingruber, A 2021. ‘Counterclaims: A Critical Analysis of Article 6 of the 2019 The Hague Resolution of the Institut de Droit International on the “Equality of Parties before International Investment Tribunals”’ 41 ICSID Rev – FILJ, doi: 10.1093/icsidreview/siaa038Google Scholar

Stern, B 2009. ‘Are Some Issues Too Political to Be Arbitrable?’ 24 ICSID Rev – FILJ 90Google Scholar

Stern, B 2005. ‘The Intervention of Private Entities and States as “Friends of the Court” in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’, in Macrory, P F J, Appleton, A E and Plummer, M G (eds), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis (New York: Springer), vol 1Google Scholar

Stern, B 2002. ‘L’entrée de la société civile dans l’arbitrage entre Etat et investisseur’ 2 Revue de l’Arbitrage 329Google Scholar

Strong, S I 2013. Class, Mass and Collective Arbitration in National and International Law (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Szczudlik, K 2018. ‘Effective Management of Mass Claims Arbitration: What We Could Learn from International Tribunals’, in Akbaba, M and Capurro, G (eds), International Challenges in Investment Arbitration (New York: Routledge)Google Scholar

Toral, M and Schultz, T 2010. ‘The State, a Perpetual Respondent in Investment Arbitration?’, in Waibel, M, Kaushal, A, Chung, K-H and Balchin, C (eds), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (London: Kluwer)Google Scholar

Treves, R T 2015. ‘Equality of Arms and Inequality of Resources’, in Savarian, A, Fontanelli, F, Baker, R and Tzevelekos, V (eds), Procedural Fairness in International Courts and Tribunals (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law)Google Scholar

Ulmer, N 2010. ‘The Cost Conundrum’ 26 Arb Int’L 221Google Scholar

van Houtte, H and McAsey, B 2012. ‘Case Comment, Abaclat and Ors v Argentina: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims’ 27 ICSID Rev – FILJ 231Google Scholar

Vidal-Léon, C 2014. ‘Inequality of the Parties before the International Court of Justice: Reflections on the Appellate Jurisdiction over ILOAT Judgments’ 5 JIDS 406Google Scholar

Wälde, T 2010. ‘Chapter 8: “Equality of Arms” in Investment Arbitration: Procedural Challenges’, in Yannaca-Small, K (ed), Arbitration under International Investment Agreements: A Guide to the Key Issues (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Wälde, T 2007. ‘Introduction: International Investment Law Emerging from the Dynamics of Direct Investor–State Arbitration’, in Kahn, P and Wälde, T (eds), New Aspects of International Investment Law, Hague Academy of International Law (Leiden and Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar

Zimermann, A, Oellers-Frahm, K, Tomuschat, C and Tams, C J (eds) 2012. The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

American Law Institute (ALI)/UNIDROIT 2004. Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

European Commission (EC) 2015. ‘Report: Online Public Consultation on Investment Protection and Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement (TTIP)’ (13 January), http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/january/tradoc_153044.pdfGoogle Scholar

EC and Government of Canada 2017. ‘The Case for Creating a Multilateral Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanism’ (Informal ministerial meeting, World Economic Forum, Davos, 20 January)Google Scholar

European Union Council 2018. ‘Negotiating Directives for a Convention Establishing a Multilateral Court for the Settlement of Investment Disputes’ (20 March), 12981/17 ADD 1 DCL 1Google Scholar

France 2015. ‘Towards a New Way to Settle Disputes between States and Investors’ (May), www.diplomatie.gouv.frGoogle Scholar

Geneva Center for International Dispute Settlement (CIDS) 2017. ‘Supplemental Report: The Composition of a Multilateral Investment Court and of an Appeal Mechanism for Investment Awards’ (15 November)Google Scholar

Geneva Center for International Dispute Settlement (CIDS) (G Kaufmann-Kohler and M Potestà) 2016. ‘Can the Mauritius Convention Serve as a Model for the Reform of Investor-State Arbitration in Connection with the Introduction of a Permanent Investment Tribunal or an Appeal Mechanism?’Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International 2013. ‘Legal Aspects of Recourse to Arbitration by an Investor against the Authorities of the Host State under Inter-State Treaties’ (Eighteenth Commission, A Giardina Rapporteur) 75 Annuaire 1, (2014) 29 ICSID Rev – FILJ 701Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International 2011. ‘The Position of the International Judge’ (Sixth Commission, G Guillaume Rapporteur) 74 Annuaire 3Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International 1989. ‘Arbitration between States, State Enterprises, or State Entities and Foreign Enterprises’ 63 Annuaire Pt I, 31–204 (preparatory work), Pt II, 121–2 (deliberations of the Institut), 324–31 (Resolution as adopted)Google Scholar

International Bar Association (IBA) 2014. ‘IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (rev edn, adopted 23 October)Google Scholar

International Bar Association (IBA) 2010. ‘Commentary on the Revised Text of the 2010 IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration’, www.ibanet.org/MediaHandler?id=DD240932-0E08-40D4-9866-309A635487C0Google Scholar

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) 2020a. ‘Updated Backgrounder on Proposals for Amendment of the ICSID Rules’ (28 February)Google Scholar

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) 2020b. ‘Working Paper #4: Proposals for Amendment of the ICSID Rules’ (28 February)Google Scholar

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) 2019a. ‘Working Paper #2: Proposals for Amendment of the ICSID Rules’ (March)Google Scholar

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) 2019b. ‘Working Paper #3: Proposals for Amendment of the ICSID Rules’ (August)Google Scholar

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) 2018a. ‘Proposals for the Amendment of the ICSID Rules’ (2 August)Google Scholar

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) 2018b. ‘Schedule 8: Transparency – Access to Documents, Access to Hearings, and Non-Disputing Party Participating in ICSID Proceedings’, in ‘Working Paper #1: Proposals for Amendment of the ICSID Rules’, vol 3 (2 August)Google Scholar

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) 2018c. ‘Schedule 9: Addressing Time and Cost in ICSID Arbitration’, in ‘Working Paper #1: Proposals for Amendment of the ICSID Rules’, vol 3 (2 August)Google Scholar

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) 1969. ‘Documents Concerning the Origin and the Formulation of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States’Google Scholar

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) 1965. ‘Report of the Executive Directors on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States’Google Scholar

ICSID Secretariat 2018. ‘Working Paper #1: Proposals for Amendment of the ICSID Rules’ (3 vols, 2 August)Google Scholar

ICSID/UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) 2020. ‘Code of Conduct for Adjudicators in Investor–State Dispute Settlement’ (1 May), https://uncitral.un.org/en/codeofconductGoogle Scholar

International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) 2012. ICC Commission Report, ‘States, State Entities and ICC Arbitration’Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA) 2018. ‘Report of the ICCA-Queen Mary Task Force on Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration’ (ICCA Report No 4, April)Google Scholar

International Law Association (ILA) 2005. Study Group on the Practice and Procedure of International Courts and Tribunals, ‘Burgh House Principles on the Independence of the International Judiciary’ (P Sands and C McLachlan, Co-Chairs) 4 LPICT 247Google Scholar

International Law Commission (ILC) 1955. ‘Commentary on the Draft Convention on Arbitral Procedure Adopted by the International Law Commission at Its Fifth Session, Prepared by the Secretariat’, UN Doc A/CN.4/92Google Scholar

NAFTA Free Trade Commission (FTC) 2004. ‘Statement of the Free Trade Commission on Non-Disputing Party Participation’, www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/commission/nondispute_e.pdfGoogle Scholar

UNCITRAL 2020a. ‘Report of Working Group III (Investor–State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the Work of Its Resumed Thirty-Eighth Session (Vienna, 20–24 January 2020)’, UN Doc A/CN.9/1004/Add.1Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2020b. ‘Selection and Appointment of ISDS Tribunal Members: Note by the Secretariat’ (Draft working papers for comment), UN Doc A/CN.9/WG.III/WPGoogle Scholar

UNCITRAL 2020c. ‘Mulitple Proceedings and Counterclaims: Note by the Secretariat’ (22 January), UN Doc A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.193Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2019a. ‘Report of Working Group III (Investor–State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the Work of Its Thirty-Eighth Session (Vienna, 14–18 October 2019)’, UN Doc A/CN.9/1004Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2019b. ‘Background Information on a Code of Conduct: Note by the Secretariat’ (31 July), UN Doc A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.167Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2019c. ‘Advisory Centre: Note by the Secretariat’ (25 July), UN Doc A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.168Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2019d. ‘Third-Party Funding – Possible Solutions: Note by the Secretariat’ (2 August), UN Doc A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.172Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2018. ‘Report of Working Group III (Investor–State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the Work of Its Thirty-Fifth Session’ (14 May), UN Doc A/CN.9/935Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2017a. ‘Possible Future Work in the Field of Dispute Settlement: Reforms of Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Note by the Secretariat’ (20 April), UN Doc A/CN.9/917Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2017b. ‘Note by the Secretariat: Working Group III (Investor–State Dispute Settlement Reform) Thirty-Fourth Session’ (18 September), UN Doc A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.142Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2006. (J Paulson and G Petrochilos) ‘Revision of the UNCITRAL Rules: A Report’Google Scholar

UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) 2020. ‘IIA Issues Note No 2’ (July), UN Doc UNCTAD/DIAE/PCB/INF/2020/6Google Scholar

UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) 2013. ‘Reform of Investor–State Dispute Settlement: In Search of a Road-Map’ (26 June)Google Scholar

UN Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) 2007. ‘General Comment No 32 Article 14: Right to Equality before Courts and Tribunals and to a Fair Trial’ (23 August), UN Doc CCPR/C/GC/32Google Scholar

UN Secretary-General 2012. ‘Delivering Justice: Programme of Action to Strengthen the Rule of Law at the National and International Levels’ (16 March), UN Doc A/66/749Google Scholar

World Trade Organization (WTO) 2017. ‘Deepening Africa’s Integration in the Global Economy through Trade and Investment Facilitation for Development: Abuja Statement’ (7 November), Doc No WT/MIN(17)/4 WT/GC/186Google Scholar