Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T02:23:41.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Intelligent Testing: Bridging the Gap between Classical and Romantic Science in Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

By
Elaine Fletcher-Janzen
Edited by
James C. Kaufman
Elaine Fletcher-Janzen
Affiliation:
University of Northern Colorado
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

One of the many contributions made by Alan Kaufman to the field of psychology in the past 30 years, Intelligent Testing, became the gold standard for psychometric test interpretation and clinical assessment. It was an interpretive system developed by Kaufman (1979, 1994; Kaufman & Lichtenberger, 2004, 2006) during the revisions of the Wechsler scales (Wechsler, 1949, 1974, 1981) and introduced the notion that appropriate use of information gained from any IQ test used in a comprehensive assessment was guided by various clinical principles that incorporated both quantitative and qualitative analyses.

The development of this system was probably a natural response on the part of Kaufman and many others to calm the controversy surrounding the measurement of intelligence in the latter part of the twentieth century. Metatheoretical principles for clinical assessment were needed in the 1970s because impassioned arguments against the misuse of IQ scores were frequent, and, sadly, evidence of misuse was replete (Berninger & O'Donnell, 2005; Fletcher & Reschly, 2005; Prifitera, Weiss, Saklosfse & Rolfus, 2005).

The intelligent testing philosophy was essentially the first system of test interpretation that followed scientific principles and at the same time overtly sought to reduce inappropriate use of obtained test scores. Intelligent testing moved emphasis away from pure psychometric and reductionistic comparisons of test scores and demanded incorporation of a contextual analysis of the test subject and interventions that had ecological validity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Intelligent Testing
Integrating Psychological Theory and Clinical Practice
 , pp. 15 - 29
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anastasi, A. (1988). Intelligent testing. Psychological Testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bayliss, Donna M.; Jarrold, Christopher; Gunn, Deborah M.; Baddeley, & Alan D. (2003). Do children's attention processes mediate the link between family predictors and school readiness?Developmental Psychology 39(3), 581–593.Google Scholar
Bernard, H.R. (1994). Research Methods in Anthropology, (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Berninger, V.W., & O' Donnell, L. (2005). Research-supported differential diagnosis of specific learning disabilities. In Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D.H., & Weiss, L.G. (Eds.), WISC-IV Clinical Use and Interpretation (pp. 189–229). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berninger, V.W., Dunn, A., & Alper, T. (2005). Integrated multilevel model for branching assessment, instructional assessment, and profile assessment. In Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D.H., & Weiss, L.G. (Eds.), WISC-IV Clinical Use and Interpretation (pp. 151–185). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, A.L. (2001). A Wundt primer: The operating characteristics of consciousness. In Reiber, R.W., & Robinson, D.K., (Eds.), Wilhelm Wundt in History: The Making of a Scientific Psychology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Brecker, S.J. (2006). The newest age of reductionism. APA Monitor on Psychology, 37, 23.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1990). Alexandr Romanovich Luria: cultural psychologist. In Goldberg, E. (Ed.), Contemporary Neuropsychology and the Legacy of Luria (pp.11–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
D'Amato, R.C., Fletcher-Janze, E., & Reynolds, C.R. (2005). The Handbook of School Neuropsychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Das, J.P. (2004). Theories of intelligence: Issues and applications. In Goldstein, G., and Beers, S.R. (Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment (pp. 5–25). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Flanagan, D.P., Ortiz, S.O., Alfonso, V.C., & Dynda, A.M. (2006). Integration of response to intervention and norm-referenced tests in learning disability identification: Learning from the Tower of Babel. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 807–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, J.M., Foorman, B.R., Boudousquie, A.B., & Barnes, M.A., Schatschneider, C., & Francis, D.J. (2002). Assessment of reading and learning disabilities: A research-based, intervention-oriented approach. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 27–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Fuchs, L.S., & Barnes, M.A. (2007). Learning Disabilities from Identification to Intervention. New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J.M., & Reschly, D.J. (2005). Changing procedures for identifying learning disabilities: The danger of perpetuating old ideas. The School Psychologist, 59, 1, 10–15.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., & Young, C.L. (2006). On the irrelevance of intelligence in predicting responsiveness to reading instruction. Exceptional Children, 73, 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, C.J. (1997). The Nebraska Neuropsychological Children's Battery. In Reynolds, C.R. & Fletcher-Janzen, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Child Neuropsychology, (2nd ed., pp. 237–251). New York: Plenum/Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, J.B. (November, 2006). Implementing IDEA 2004 with a three-tier model that includes response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. School Psychology Forum: Research in Practice, 1, 16–27.Google Scholar
Hale, J.B., & Fiorello, C. (2004). School Neuropsychology: A Practitioner's Handbook. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Hale, J.B., Naglieri, J.A., Kaufman, A.S., & Kavale, K.A. (2004). Specific learning disabilities classification in the new Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: The danger of good ideas. The School Psychologist. Winter, 6–13.Google Scholar
Hale, J.B., Kaufman, A.S., Naglieri, J.A., & Kavale, K.A., (2007). Implementation of IDEA: Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology in the Schools, XLIII, 753–770.Google Scholar
Halliwell, M. (1999). Romantic Science and the Experience of the Self: Transatlantic Crosscurrents from William James to Oliver Sacks.Aldershot, England: Brookfield.Google Scholar
,Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (2004). 20, U.S.C. 1400–1419.
Ikeda, M.J., & Gustafson, J.K. (2002). Heartland AEA 11's problem solving process: Impact on issues related to special education (Research Report No. 2002–01). Available from authors at Heartland Area Education Agency 11, 6500 Corporate Dr., Johnston, IA 50131.
Kamphaus, R.W. (2001). Clinical Assessment of Child and Adolescent Intelligence (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A.S. (1979). Intelligent Testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A.S. (1994). Intelligent Testing with The WISC-III. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A.S. (2000). Intelligence tests and school psychology: Predicting the future by studying the past. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 1, 7–16.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (1983). The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC). Circle Pines, MN: AGS.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (2004). The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, second edition (KABC-II). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A.S., & Lichtenberger, E.O., (2004, 2006). Assessing Adolescent and Adult Intelligence (3rd ed.) New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M.R.T., & Turkstra, L. (2006). Group intervention studies in the cognitive rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichtenberger, E.O. (2006). Computer utilization and clinical judgment in psychological assessment reports. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCloskey, G., & Maerlender, A. (2005). The WISC-IV integrated. In Prifitera, A., Sakalofske, D.H., & Weiss, L.G. (Eds.), WISC-IV Clinical Use and Interpretation (pp. 101–149). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, P.A., Fantuzzo, J.W., & Gluttting, J.J. (1990). Just say no to subtest analysis: A critique on Wechsler theory and practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2007). Essentials of School Neuropsychological Assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Naglieri, J.A., & Das, J.P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System. Chicago. IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
Naglieri, J.A., & Paolitto, A.W. (2005). Ipsative comparisons of WISC-IV index scores. Applied Neuropsychology, 12, 208–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, B.D., & Pollard, D. (1997). Altered brain development following global neglect in early childhood. Society for Neuroscience: Proceedings from Annual Meeting, New Orleans, 1997.
Perry, B.D. (2002). Childhood experience and the expression of genetic potential: what childhood neglect tells us about nature and nurture. Brain and Mind 3: 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prifitera, A., Weiss, L.G., Saklofske, D.H., & Rolfhus, E. (2005). The WISC-IV in the clinical assessment context. In Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D.H., & Weiss, L.G. (Eds.), WISC-IV Clinical Use and Interpretation (pp. 3–28). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reschley, D.J. (1997). Diagnostic and treatment utility of intelligence tests. In Flanagan, D.P., Genshaft, J.L., & Harrison, P.L. (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues (pp. 437–456). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C.R. (2007). Intelligent testing. In Reynolds, C.R. & Fletcher-Janzen, E. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Special Education (3rd ed; pp. 1132–1135). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C.R., & Fletcher-Janzen, E. (2007). Encyclopedia of Special Education (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C.R., & French, C.L. (2005). The brain as a dynamic organ of information processing and learning. In D'Amato, R.C., Fletcher-Janzen, E., & Reynolds, C.R. (Eds.), The Handbook of School Neuropsychology (pp. 86–119). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sacks, O. (1990). Luria and “romantic science.” In Goldberg, E. (Ed.), Contemporary Neuropsychology and the Legacy of Luria (pp.181–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schrank, F.A., Miller, J.A., Caterino, L.C., & Desrochers, J. (2006). American Academy of School Psychology survey on the independent educational evaluation for a specific learning disability: results and discussion. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 771–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, L.S. (1988). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–478, 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tupper, D.E. (1999). Introduction: Alexander Luria's continuing influence on worldwide neuropsychology. Neuropsychology Review, 9, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wasserstein, A.G. (1988). Towards a romantic science: The work of Oliver Sacks. Annals of Internal Medicine, 109, 440–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, M.W., & Kush, J.C. (1994). Wechsler subtest analysis: The right way, the wrong way, or no way?School Psychology Review, 23, 640–651.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1949). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. (WISC-R). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Werner, H. (1937). Process and achievement: A basic problem of education and developmental psychology. Harvard Educational Review, 7, 353–368.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. (2001). Romantic science and the experience of the self: Book review. Journal of the History of Science in Society 92, 189.Google Scholar
Witt, J.C., & Gresham, F.M. (1985). Review of the Wechsler intelligence scale for children-revised. In Mitchell, J.V. (Ed.), Ninth Mental Measurements Yearbook (pp. 1716–1719). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Wodrich, D.L., Spencer, M.L.S., & Daley, K.B. (2006). Combining RTI and psychoeducational assessment: What we must assume to do otherwise. Psychology in the Schools. 43, 797–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yun Dai, D. (2005). Reductionism versus emergentism: A framework for understanding conceptions of giftedness. Roeper Review, 27, 144–151.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×