Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T13:57:29.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - From the shopping mall to the street corner: dynamics of exclusion in the governance of public space

from PART 3 - Comparative crime control and urban governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2011

Adam Crawford
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Adam Crawford
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

Perceptions of security and order increasingly inform how urban spaces are imagined, designed and governed. Drawing on insights from two research studies, this chapter charts the manner in which dynamics of exclusion previously confined to the shopping mall and other examples of ‘mass private property’ are gradually being extended into the public realm. It outlines the privatisation of public spaces, the emergence of novel forms of spatial exclusion and the growing importance of conditionality as the basis for access to resources, goods and services. Attracting ‘good customers’, whilst intercepting and deflecting ‘flawed consumers’, is an increasingly dominant logic of contemporary urban governance. Consideration is given to the politics of behaviour as institutionalised in the British antisocial behaviour agenda and its comparative implications. In particular, the chapter focuses on the ways in which young people as ‘non-consumers’ are problematised and policed. It is argued that strategies and technologies of ‘preventive exclusion’ deployed and developed on private property now routinely inform the governance of public spaces. Public streets are being ‘reordered’ through the banning and dispersal of those who do not conform to the consuming majority or those whose appearance jars with the prevailing vision of an ordered world in which security pervades urban environments.

Type
Chapter
Information
International and Comparative Criminal Justice and Urban Governance
Convergence and Divergence in Global, National and Local Settings
, pp. 483 - 518
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, R. and Blandy, S. (2005) ‘International perspectives on the new enclavism and the rise of gated communities’, Housing Studies, 20(2), 177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, J., Fyfe, N. and Kearns, A. (2006) ‘Respectable or respectful? (In)civility and the city’, Urban Studies, 43(5/6), 919–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2004) Wasted Lives: Modernity and its Outcasts, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Beckett, K. and Herbert, S. (2008) ‘Dealing with disorder: social control in the post industrial city’, Theoretical Criminology, 12(1), 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, K. and Herbert, S. (2010) Banished: The New Social Control in Urban America, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campo, D., and Ryan, B. (2008) ‘The entertainment zone: unplanned nightlife and the revitalization of the American downtown’, Journal of Urban Design, 13(3), 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cauter, L. de (2005) The Capsular Civilization: On the City in an Age of Fear, Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.Google Scholar
Cook, I. R. (2010) ‘Policing, partnerships and profits: the operation of business improvement districts and town centre management schemes in England’, Urban Geography, 31(4), 453–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. (1997) The Local Governance of Crime, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. (2006a) ‘Networked governance and the post-regulatory state?: Steering, rowing and anchoring the provision of policing and security’, Theoretical Criminology, 10(4), 449–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. (2006b) ‘Policing and security as “club goods”: the new enclosures?’ in Wood, J. and Dupont, B. (eds.), Democracy, Society and the Governance of Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A.(2007) ‘Reassurance policing: feeling is believing’ in Henry, A. and Smith, D. J. (eds.), Transformations in Policing, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 143–68.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. (2008) ‘Dispersal powers and the symbolic role of anti-social behaviour legislation’, Modern Law Review, 71(5), 753–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. (2009a) ‘Restorative justice and anti-social behaviour interventions as contractual governance’ in Knepper, P., Doak, J. and Shapland, J. (eds.), Crime Prevention, Surveillance, and Restorative Justice: Effects of Social Technologies, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 167–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. (2009b) ‘Governing through anti-social behaviour: regulatory challenges to criminal justice’, British Journal of Criminology, 49(6), 810–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. and Lister, S. (2007) The Use and Impact of Dispersal Orders: Sticking Plasters and Wake-Up Calls, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, A., Lister, S., Blackburn, S. and Burnett, J. (2005) Plural Policing: The Mixed Economy of Visible Patrols in England and Wales, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. (1991) ‘The fifth ecology: fantasy, the automobile, and Los Angeles’ in Wachs, M. and Crawford, M. (eds.), The Car and the City, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (1990) City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (1998) Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster, New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Dixon, D. and Maher, L. (2005) ‘Policing, crime and public health: lessons for Australia from the “New York miracle”’, Criminal Justice, 5(2), 115–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eick, V. (2006) ‘Preventive urban discipline: rent-a-cops and neoliberal glocalization in Germany’, Social Justice, 33(3), 66–84.Google Scholar
Ericson, R. (2007) Crime in an Insecure World, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ericson, R. and Haggerty, K. (1997) Policing the Risk Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Field, F. (2003) Neighbours from Hell: The Politics of Behaviour, London: Politico's Publishing.Google Scholar
Flusty, S. (1994) Building Paranoia: The Proliferation of Interdictory Space and the Erosion of Spatial Justice, West Hollywood, CA: Los Angeles Forum for Architecture and Urban Design.Google Scholar
Flusty, S. (2001) ‘The banality of interdiction: surveillance, control and the displacement of diversity’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(3), 658–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freeman, A. (1998) ‘Go to the mall with my parents? A constitutional analysis of the mall of America's juvenile curfew’, Dickinson Law Review, 102, 481–539.Google Scholar
Graham, S. and Marvin, S. (2001) Splintering Urbanism, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, S. F. and Gray, K. (1999a) ‘Civil rights, civil wrongs and quasi-public space’, European Human Rights Law Review, 3(1), 46–102.Google Scholar
Gray, S. F. and Gray, K. (1999b) ‘Private property and public propriety’ in McLean, J. (ed.), Property and the Constitution, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 11–39.Google Scholar
Hadfield, P. (2006) Bar Wars: Contesting the Night in Contemporary British Cities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, P. (2008) ‘From threat to promise: nightclub “security”, governance and consumer elites’, British Journal of Criminology, 48(4), 429–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, P. (2009) Nightlife and Crime: Social Order and Governance in International Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harcourt, B. (2007) Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing and Punishing in an Actuarial Age, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (1989) The Urban Experience, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hayward, K. (2004) City Limits: Crime, Consumer Culture and the Urban Experience, London: Cavendish Publishing.Google Scholar
Hayward, K. and Hobbs, D. (2007) ‘Beyond the binge in “booze Britain”: market-led liminalization and the spectacle of binge drinking’, British Journal of Sociology, 58(3), 437–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, A. and Shearing, C. (2000) ‘Exclusion from public space’ in Hirsch, A., Garland, D. and Wakefield, A. (eds.), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 77–96.Google Scholar
Hobbs, D., Hadfield, P., Lister, S. and Winlow, S. (2003) Bouncers: Violence and Governance in the Night-time Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
,Home Office (2006) Good Practice for Police Authorities and Forces in Obtaining CSO Funding, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
,Home Office (2007) Tools and Powers to Tackle Anti-social Behaviour, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Johnston, L. and Shearing, C. (2003) Governing Security, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, T. and Newburn, T. (2007) Policy Transfer and Criminal Justice, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Kempa, M., Carrier, R., Wood, J. and Shearing, C. (1999) ‘Reflections on the evolving concept of “private policing”’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 7(2), 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, M. (2004) Brave New Neighborhoods: The Privatization of Public Space, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koolhaas, R., Mau, B., Werlemann, H. and Sigler, J. (1995) S, M, L, XL, Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.Google Scholar
Lessig, L. (1999) Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Levi, R. (2008) ‘Loitering in the city that works: on circulation, activity, and police in governing urban space’ in Dubber, M. D. and Valverde, M. (eds.), Police and the Liberal State, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 178–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, R. (2009) ‘Making counter-law: on having no apparent purpose in Chicago’, British Journal of Criminology, 49(2), 131–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, J. R. and Molotch, H. (1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Low, S. (2004) Behind the Gates, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mayer, C. (2008) ‘Britain's mean streets’, Time Magazine, 2 April.
Measham, F. and Brain, K. (2005) ‘“Binge” drinking, British alcohol policy and the new culture of intoxication’, Crime, Media, Culture, 1(3), 262–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minton, A. (2009) Ground Control: Fear and Happiness in the Twenty-first-Century City, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. (2005) ‘Property rights, the First Amendment, and judicial anti-urbanism: the strange case of Virginia v Hicks’, Urban Geography, 26(7), 565–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, D. and Staeheli, L. A. (2006) ‘Clean and safe? Property redevelopment, public space and homelessness in downtown San Diego’ in Low, S. and Smith, N. (eds.), The Politics of Public Space, London: Routledge, 143–70.Google Scholar
Neill, W. J. (2001) ‘Marketing the urban experience’, Urban Studies, 38(5), 815–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newburn, T. and Jones, T. (2007) ‘Symbolizing crime control: reflections on zero tolerance’, Theoretical Criminology, 11(2), 221–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, O. (1972) Defensible Space: People and Design in the Violent City, London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Palomo, E. (2002) ‘“The sheriff knows who the troublemakers are. Just let him round them up.” Chicago's new gang loitering ordinance’, University of Illinois Law Review, 729–60.Google Scholar
Peel, D., Lloyd, G. and Lord, A. (2009) ‘Business improvement districts and the discourse of contractualism’, European Planning Studies, 17(3), 401–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presdee, M. (2000) Cultural Criminology and the Carnival of Crime, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, P. (2008) ‘The theory of vulnerable autonomy and the legitimacy of civil preventive orders’ in McSherry, B., Norrie, A. and Bronitt, S. (eds.), Regulating Deviance: The Redirection of Criminalisation and the Futures of Criminal Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 109–39.Google Scholar
Relph, E. (1987) The Modern Urban Landscape, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rigakos, G. S. and Greener, D. (2000) ‘Bubbles of governance: private policing and the law in Canada’, Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 15, 145–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. (2009) ‘Planning, urban design and the night-time city: still at the margins?’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 9(4), 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sennett, R. (1992) The Conscience of the Eye: The Design and Social Life of Cities, New York: WW Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Shearing, C. (1995) ‘Reinventing policing: policing as governance’ in Sack, F., Vob, M., Frehsee, D., Funk, A. and Reinke, H. (eds.), Privatisierung Staatlicher Kontrolle: befunde, konzepte, tendenzen, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgellschaft, 70–87.Google Scholar
Shearing, C. and Stenning, P. (1981) ‘Modern private security: its growth and implications’, Crime and Justice, 3, 193–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearing, C. and Stenning, P. (1987) ‘“Say cheese!”: The Disney order that is not so Mickey Mouse’ in Shearing, C. and Stenning, P. (eds.), Private Policing, London: Sage, pp. 317–23.Google Scholar
Smith, N. (2001) ‘Global social cleansing: postliberal revanchism and the export of zero tolerance’, Social Justice, 28(3), 68–75.Google Scholar
Sorkin, M. (1992) (ed.) Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space, New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Staeheli, L. A. and Mitchell, D. (2006) ‘USA's destiny? Regulating space and creating community in American shopping malls, Urban Studies, 43(5/6), 977–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strosnider, E. (2002) ‘Anti-gang ordinances after City of Chicago v. Morales: the intersection of race, vagueness doctrine, and equal protection in the criminal law’, The American Criminal Law Review, 39, 101–46.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2005) Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaaningen, R. van (2008) ‘Sweeping the street: civil society and community safety in Rotterdam’ in Shapland, J. (ed.), Justice, Community and Civil Society: A Contested Terrain, Cullompton: Willan, pp. 87–106.Google Scholar
Wakefield, A. (2003) Selling Security, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. and Kelling, G. (1982) ‘Broken windows’, The Atlantic Monthly, March, 29–37.Google Scholar
Wood, J. and Shearing, C. (2007) Imagining Security, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Young, J. (1999) The Exclusive Society, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Young, J. (2007) The Vertigo of Late Modernity, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Zedner, L. (2003) ‘Too much security?’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 31, 155–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zedner, L. (2007) ‘Pre-crime and post-criminology’, Theoretical Criminology, 11(2), 261–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×