Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- Table of Cases
- Introduction
- 1 International human rights law and notions of human rights: foundations, achievements and challenges
- 2 International human rights law: the normative framework
- 3 Human rights in practice
- 4 The United Nations Charter system
- 5 The UN human rights treaty system
- 6 Regional human rights treaty systems
- 7 Individual complaints procedures
- 8 Civil and political rights
- 9 Economic, social and cultural rights
- 10 Group rights: self-determination, minorities and indigenous peoples
- 11 The human rights of women
- 12 The right to development, poverty and related rights
- 13 Victims’ rights and reparation
- 14 The application of human rights in armed conflict and the international criminalisation process
- 15 Human rights and counter-terrorism
- 16 Non-state actors and human rights
- 17 Globalisation and its impact on human rights
- Index
- References
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core
6 - Regional human rights treaty systems
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- Table of Cases
- Introduction
- 1 International human rights law and notions of human rights: foundations, achievements and challenges
- 2 International human rights law: the normative framework
- 3 Human rights in practice
- 4 The United Nations Charter system
- 5 The UN human rights treaty system
- 6 Regional human rights treaty systems
- 7 Individual complaints procedures
- 8 Civil and political rights
- 9 Economic, social and cultural rights
- 10 Group rights: self-determination, minorities and indigenous peoples
- 11 The human rights of women
- 12 The right to development, poverty and related rights
- 13 Victims’ rights and reparation
- 14 The application of human rights in armed conflict and the international criminalisation process
- 15 Human rights and counter-terrorism
- 16 Non-state actors and human rights
- 17 Globalisation and its impact on human rights
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Initial concerns that regional human rights systems may undermine the universality of rights have largely given way to a more positive appreciation of their beneficial role. Regional human rights systems provide a crucial layer of protection. They are closely connected with regional political developments and integration which potentially gives them more traction than the UN system. Moreover, increasing references to their jurisprudence and practice evince how they contribute to, and enrich, international human rights law.
An examination of regional human rights systems suggests the following typical process. States agree on the need for closer regional cooperation if not integration. Human rights are accepted as one element of, and a yardstick for, the regional political order. A foundational human rights instrument is adopted. Further, a human rights body with a mandate to promote human rights and monitor states parties’ compliance with their treaty obligations is set up. Over time, responding to demands and with a view to strengthening the effectiveness and credibility of the system, substantive rights are broadened and the role of victims (and others, particularly NGOs) in raising the issue of, or complaining about, human rights violations is enhanced. As the system matures this momentum eventually results in the establishment of a judicial body. Parallel efforts to foster regional political integration reinforce the importance of human rights at all levels as a marker of the system’s ability to provide a stable order based on the rule of law and the protection of fundamental rights.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Human Rights Law and Practice , pp. 219 - 272Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010).
and (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011).
, The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
, NGOs and the Struggle for Human Rights in Europe (Oxford: Hart, 2011).
, Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2011).
ECHR: .
CoE: .
EU: .
and , The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Case Law and Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011).
and (eds.), The Inter-American Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1998).
, The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
and (eds.), Human Rights Regimes in the Americas (Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 2010).
IACHR: .
IACtHR: .
Organisation of American States: .
and (eds.), The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: The System in Practice 1986–2006, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
, The African Human Rights System: Origin and Evolution (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
, The African Human Rights System, Activist Forces and International Institutions (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
, International Human Rights Law in Africa, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2012).
African Commission: .
ACtHPR: .
African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child: .
See on the jurisprudence of all three of the above also African Human Rights Law Case Analyser: .
AU: .
Community Court of Justice – ECOWAS:
East African Court of Justice:
SADC Tribunal:
and (eds.), Human Rights in the Asia-Pacific Region: Towards Institution Building (London, New York: Routledge, 2011).
, The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights: Institutionalising Human Rights in South East Asia (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights: .
, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010).
and (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011).
, The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
, NGOs and the Struggle for Human Rights in Europe (Oxford: Hart, 2011).
, Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2011).
ECHR: .
CoE: .
EU: .
and , The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Case Law and Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011).
and (eds.), The Inter-American Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1998).
, The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
and (eds.), Human Rights Regimes in the Americas (Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 2010).
IACHR: .
IACtHR: .
Organisation of American States: .
and (eds.), The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: The System in Practice 1986–2006, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
, The African Human Rights System: Origin and Evolution (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
, The African Human Rights System, Activist Forces and International Institutions (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
, International Human Rights Law in Africa, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2012).
African Commission: .
ACtHPR: .
African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child: .
See on the jurisprudence of all three of the above also African Human Rights Law Case Analyser: .
AU: .
Community Court of Justice – ECOWAS:
East African Court of Justice:
SADC Tribunal:
and (eds.), Human Rights in the Asia-Pacific Region: Towards Institution Building (London, New York: Routledge, 2011).
, The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights: Institutionalising Human Rights in South East Asia (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights: .
Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, UN Doc. A/CONF.157/23 (12 July 1993), para. 37.
, The African Human Rights System, Activist Forces and International Institutions (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 67–90,
, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010).
, Democracy and Human Rights for Europe: The Council of Europe’s Contribution (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2009),
(ed.), Pioneer and Guarantor for Human Rights (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2010).
, and , The UK and the European Court of Human Rights, UK Equality and Human Rights Commission Research report 83 (London: Metropolitan University, Human Rights and Social Justice Research Institute, 2011), 8–9.
and , The European Social Charter: The Protection of Economic and Social Rights in Europe, 2nd edn (New York: Transnational Publishers, 2001),
, and (eds.), Social Rights in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2005),
, ‘Remedies for Violations of Social Rights within the Council of Europe: the Significant Absence of a Court’, in C. Kilpatrick, T. Novitz and P. Skidmore (eds.), The Future of Remedies in Europe (Oxford: Hart, 2000), 231–52, at 232–5.
, Inhuman States: Imprisonment, Detention and Torture in Europe Today (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).
(ed.), The Rights of Minorities: A Commentary on the European Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (Oxford University Press, 2005);
et al. (eds.), The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities: A Useful Pan-European Instrument? (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2008).
, The Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (London, New York: Routledge, 2007).
, International Human Rights Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010), 571–4.
, and , Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1995), 571–603.
, Annual Report 2011 (Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, 2012), 14.
Decision on the Competence of the Court to give an advisory opinion, Grand Chamber (2 June 2004); Advisory opinion on certain legal questions concerning the lists of candidates submitted with a view to the election of judges to the European Court of Human Rights, Grand Chamber (12 February 2008); Advisory opinion on certain legal questions concerning the lists of candidates submitted with a view to the election of judges to the European Court of Human Rights (no. 2), Grand Chamber (21 January 2010).
Overview 1959–2011 (Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, 2012), 7.
, Cases and Materials on the European Convention of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2012), 488–597.
Hirst v. United Kingdom, (2006)
D. H. and Others v. The Czech Republic, (2008)
Goodwin v. United Kingdom, (2002)
, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007).
König v. Federal Republic of Germany, (1978)
Loizidou v. Turkey, (1995)
Tyrer v. United Kingdom, (1978)
, Who Believes in Human Rights? Reflections on the European Convention (Cambridge University Press, 2006), particularly at 197–201, 206–10 and 238–41.
, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002);
Lingens v. Austria, (1986)
Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey, (2002)
and , ‘Lost in Translation: the Human Rights Ideal and International Human Rights Law’, in Meckled-Garcia and Çali, The Legalization of Human Rights: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Human Rights and Human Rights Law (London, New York: Routledge, 2006), 10–29.
, ‘The European Convention of Human Rights beyond the frontiers of Europe’, ICLQ
12(4) (1963), 1206–31Google Scholar
and (eds.), The European Convention on Human Rights and its Member States, 1950–2000 (Oxford University Press, 2001).
and , National Implementation of ECHR Rights: Kant’s Categorical Imperative and the Convention, University of Oslo Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series (2011) no. 2011–15.
et al., Evaluating the Impact of Selected Cases under the Human Rights Act on Public Services Provision (Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2009), 28–39.
, ‘The Logics of Supranational Human Rights Litigation, Official Acknowledgement and Human Rights Reform: the Southeast Turkey cases before the European Court of Human Rights between 1996–2006’, LS, 35(2) (2010), 311–37.Google Scholar
, The Degradation of the International Legal Order? The Rehabilitation of Law, and the Possibility of Politics (London, New York: Routledge, 2008).
et al., Responding to Systemic Human Rights Violations: An Analysis of Pilot Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and their Impact at National Level (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010), pp. 15–23,
and (eds.), Protocol No. 14 and the Reform of the European Court of Human Rights (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2005).
, ‘De minimis non curat the European Court of Human Rights: the Introduction of a New Admissibility Criterion Article 12 of Protocol No. 14’, EHRLR
1 (2008), 80–105.Google Scholar
Report of the Group of Wise Persons to the Committee of Ministers, CM(2006)203 (2006),
, ‘What’s Wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights?’, HRQ
30(3) (2008), 680–92,Google Scholar
, ‘Individual and Constitutional Justice: Can the Power Balance of Adjudication be reversed?’, in J. Christofferson and M. R. Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011), 181–203.
(ed.), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999),
(ed.), European Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007).
, Human Rights and the European Court of Justice: Past and Present Tendencies, Warwick Research Papers (2011) no. 2011/06.
(ed.), Human Rights in Europe, Commentary on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2010).
, ‘The Road not Taken: the European Union as a Global Human Rights Actor’, AJIL
105(4) (2011), 649–93.Google Scholar
and (eds.), The Inter-American System of Human Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998);
, The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2003);
, ‘History and action: The Inter-American Human Rights System and the Role of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights’, HRQ
31(4) (2009), 856–87.Google Scholar
Enhancing Canada’s role in the OAS: Canadian Adherence to the American Convention on Human Rights: Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights (Ottawa: Senate of Canada, 2003),
, ‘The United States and the American Convention on Human Rights: Prospects and Problems of Ratification’, in D. Forsythe (ed.), The United States and Human Rights: Looking Inward and Outward (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2000), 94–109.
Honduras: Human Rights and the Coup d’Etat, OEA/Ser. L/V/II Doc.55 (30 December 2009).
, ‘From massive violations to structural patterns: new approaches and classic tensions in the Inter-American human rights system’, SUR – International Journal on Human Rights (SUR-IJHR), 11, (2009), 7–37, at 23.Google Scholar
and , The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Case Law and Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011), 40–7.
, The Landmark Rulings of the Inter American Court of Human Rights on the Rights of the Child: Protecting the Most Vulnerable at the Edge (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).
and , ‘Why the Human Rights Regime in the Americas matters’, in M. Serrano and V. Popovski (eds.), Human Rights Regimes in the Americas (Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 2010), 29–55, at 42.
and , ‘Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-First Century: the Case of the Inter-American Court’, AJIL
102 (2008), 768–827, at 822–4.Google Scholar
, ‘Remedial Approaches to Human Rights Violations: the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Beyond’, Colum. J. Transnat’l L.
46 (2008), 351–419, at 371, fn. 101. See also section 13.10.8.Google Scholar
et al., ‘The Effectiveness of the Inter-American System of Human Rights Protection: a Quantitative Approach to its Functioning and Compliance With its Decisions’, SUR-IJHR
12 (2010), 9–36,Google Scholar
, From Judgment to Justice, Implementing International and Regional Human Rights Decisions (New York: Open Society Foundations, 2010), 63–92.
, Position Document on the Process of Strengthening of the Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights, OEA/Ser. L/V/II, Doc. 68 (8 April 2012).
, The African Human Rights System: Origin and Evolution (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010);
, The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: A Comprehensive Agenda for Human Rights (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003), 19–48;
, International Human Rights Law in Africa, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2012), 151–69;
, ‘African Human Rights Law in Theory and Practice’, in S. Joseph and A. McBeth (eds.), Research Handbook on International Human Rights Law (Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2010), 388–413.
, Human Rights: A Political and Cultural Critique (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002), 82–92.
, ‘Civil and Political Rights in the African Charter: Articles 8–14’, in M. Evans and R. Murray (eds.), The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: The System in Practice 1986–2006, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2008), 213–43,
, Human Rights in Africa: From the OAU to the African Union (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 1–48,
, ‘Lessons from a State of Flux: the International Justice Laboratory of the Great Lakes Pact’, in L. Oette (ed.), Criminal Law Reform and Transitional Justice: Human rights perspectives for Sudan (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), 197–226.
and , ‘The Role of Sub-Regional Courts in the African Human Rights System’, SUR-IJHR
7(13) (2010), 119–44.Google Scholar
Krishna Achuthan (on behalf of Aleke Banda), Amnesty International (on behalf of Orton and Vera Chirwa), Amnesty International (on behalf of Orton and Vera Chirwa) v. Malawi, 64/92-68/92-78/92 (1994); Organisation mondiale contre la torture, Association Internationale des juristes démocrates, Commission internationale des juristes, Union interafricaine des droits de l’Homme v. Rwanda, 27/89-46/91-49/91-99/93 (1996); Free Legal Assistance Group, Lawyers’ Committee for Human Rights, Union Interafricaine des Droits de l’Homme, Les Témoins de Jehovah v. Democratic Republic of Congo, 25/89-47/90-56/91-100/93 (1996); Union interafricaine des droits de l’Homme, Fédération internationale des ligues des droits de l’Homme, RADDHO, Organisation nationale des droits de l’Homme au Sénégal and Association malienne des droits de l’Homme v. Angola, 159/96 (1997); Amnesty International, Comité Loosli Bachelard, Lawyers’ Committee for Human Rights, Association of Members of the Episcopal Conference of East Africa v. Sudan, 48/90-50/91-52/91-89/93 (1999); and in the early 2000s, Malawi African Association, Amnesty International, Ms Sarr Diop, Union interafricaine des droits de l’Homme and RADDHO, Collectif des veuves et ayants-Droit, Association mauritanienne des droits de l’Homme v. Mauritania, 54/91-61/91-96/93-98/93-164/97-196/97-210/98 (2000); and Movement burkinabé des droits de l’Homme et des peoples v. Burkina Faso, 204/97 (2001).
International PEN, Constitutional Rights Project, Civil Liberties Organisation and Interights (on behalf of Ken Saro Wiwa Jnr) v. Nigeria, 137/94-139/94-154/96-161/97 (1998),
Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa (on behalf of Sierra Leonean refugees in Guinea) v. Guinea, 249/02 (2004); Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum v. Zimbabwe, 245/02 (2006); Article 19 v. Eritrea, 275/03 (2007); Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa (on behalf of Esmaila Connateh & 13 others) v. Angola, 292/04 (2008); Mouvement ivoirien des droits humains (MIDH) v. Cote d’Ivoire, 246/02 (2008); Sudan Human Rights Organisation & Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) v. Sudan, 279/03–296/05 (2009); Association of Victims of Post Electoral Violence & Interights v. Cameroon, 272/03 (2009). See also Statistics on the Implementation of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, 30 years later (Banjul: African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, September 2011).
Democratic Republic of Congo v. Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda, 227/99 (2003).
Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and Center for Economic and Social Rights (CESR) v. Nigeria (Ogoniland case), 155/96 (2001)
Centre for Minority Rights Development (Kenya) and Minority Rights Group (on behalf of Endorois Welfare Council) v. Kenya (Endorois case), 276/03 (2009).
Garreth Anver Prince v. South Africa, 255/02 (2004),
John K. Modise v. Botswana, 97/93 (2000).
IHRDA and Open Society Justice Initiative (OSJI) (on behalf of children of Nubian descent in Kenya) v. Kenya, 002/09 (2011).
and , ‘State Compliance with the Recommendations of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, 1994–2004’, AJIL
101 (2007), 1–34;Google Scholar
, ‘Litigating Human Rights before Sub-regional Courts in Africa: Prospects and Challenges’, African Journal of International and Comparative Law (AJICL)
17(1) (2009), 79–101;Google Scholar
, ‘Hadijatou Mani Koraou v. Niger: Slavery Unveiled by the ECOWAS Court’, HRLR
9(1) (2009), 151–70.Google Scholar
, ‘Campbell v. Republic of Zimbabwe: A moment of truth for the SADC Tribunal’, SADCLJ
1 (2011), 63–79;Google Scholar
, The Dissolution of the SADC Tribunal (19 August 2011),
, ‘The Relationship between the Origins and Regime Design of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights’, IJHR
15(8) (2011), 1185–1214.Google Scholar
, ‘Universalizing Core Human Rights in the “New” ASEAN: A Reassessment of Culture and Development Justifications against the Global Rejection of Impunity’, GJIL
1(1) (2009), 77–114Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by