Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T21:13:29.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Faye Fangfei Wang
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law
Legal Practices in the EU, US and China
, pp. 241 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aciman, C. and Vo-Verde, D. (2002) “Refining the Zippo Test: New Trends on Personal Jurisdiction for Internet Activities”, Computer & Internet Law, 19: 16.Google Scholar
Berman, P. S. (2002) “The Globalization of Jurisdiction”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151: 311.CrossRef
Boone, B. D. (Spring 2006) “Bullseye!: Why a ‘Targeting’ Approach to Personal Jurisdiction in the E-commerce Context Makes Sense Internationally”, EmoryInternational Law Review 20: 241.
Burnett, R. and Klinger, P. (2005) Drafting and Negotiating Computer Contracts (Sussex: Tottel Publishing, 2nd edn.).Google Scholar
Cachia, P. (2009) “Consumer Contracts in European Private International Law: The Sphere of Operation of the Consumer Contract Rules in the Brussels I and Rome I Regulations”, European Law Review, 34(3): 476.Google Scholar
Calliess, G. P. (2006) “Online Dispute Resolution: Consumer Redress in a Global Market Place”, German Law Journal, 7(8): 647.Google Scholar
Chen, C. (Spring 2004) “United States and European Union Approaches to Internet Jurisdiction and their Impact on E-Commerce”, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 25: 423.
Chik, W. B. (Spring 2002) “U.S. Jurisdictional Rules of Adjudication Over Business Conducted Via the Internet – Guidelines and a Checklist for the E-Commerce Merchant”, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 10: 243.
Cunard, J. P. and Coplan, J. B. (2001) “Developments in Internet and E-Commerce Law” PLI/P, 678: 935.
Deveci, H. A. (2006) “Personal Jurisdiction: Where Cyberspace Meets the Real World – Part II”, Computer Law & Security Report 22: 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogauchi, M. and Hartley, T. C. (2004) “Hague Conference on Private International Law, Preliminary Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements: Draft 6”, available at www.hcch.net/upload/wop/jdgm_pd25e.pdf (last visited on 23 March 2009).
Efroni, Z. (2002) “The Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act and the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy: New Opportunities for International Forum Shopping?Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 26: 335.Google Scholar
Fawcett, J. J., Harris, J. M. and Bridge, M. (2005) International Sale of Goods in the Conflict of Laws (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Geist, M. (2001a) “Is There a There There? Toward Greater Certainty for Internet Jurisdiction”, PLI/PAT 661: 561, 575 / Berkeley Tech. L.J. 16: 1345.
Geist, M. (2001b) Internet Law in Canada 69 (Canada: Captus Press, 2nd edn.).Google Scholar
Goode, R., Kronke, H., and McKendrick, E. (2007) Transnational Commercial Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hartley, T. and Dogauchi, M. (2007) “Explanatory Report on the 2005 Hague Choice of Court Agreements Convention”, HCCH Publication, available at www.hcch.net/upload/expl37e.pdf (last visited on 21 August 2009).
Herrmann, G. (2001) “Some Legal E-flections on Online Arbitration”, in Briner, R., Fortier, L., Berger, K. and Bredow, J. (eds.), Law of International Business and Dispute Settlement in the 21st Century (Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag KG) pp. 267–76.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (2005) International Commercial Disputes in English Courts (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 3rd edn.).Google Scholar
Katsh, E. M. and Rifkin, J. (2001) Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).Google Scholar
Kruger, T. (April 2006) “The 20th Session of the Hague Conference: A New Choice of Court Convention and the Issue of EC Membership”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55: 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lando, O. (1987) “The EEC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations”, Common Market Law Review, 24: 159.Google Scholar
Maloney, Mark M. (1993) “Specific Jurisdiction and the ‘Arise From or Relate To’ Requirement … What Does it Mean?Wash. Lee L. Rev. 50: 1265.Google Scholar
Mazzotta, F. G. (Summer 2001) “A Guide to E-Commerce: Some Legal Issues Posed by E-Commerce for American Businesses Engaged in Domestic and International Transactions”, Suffolk Transnational Law Review 24: 249.Google Scholar
McClean, D. and Beevers, K. (2005) Morris – The Conflict of Laws (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 6th edn.).Google Scholar
McLachlan, C. (1990) “Splitting the Proper Law in Private International Law”, BYIL 61: 311.
Merrett, L. (2009) “Article 23 of the Brussels I Regulation: A Comprehensive Code for Jurisdiction Agreements?”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58: 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, G. C. (2008) “Arbitration and Private International Law”, International Arbitration Law Review 11(4): 153.Google Scholar
Motion, P. (2005) “Article 17 ECD: Encouragement of Alternative Dispute Resolution On-line Dispute Resolution: A View From Scotland”, in Edwards, L. (ed.), The New Legal Framework for E-commerce in Europe (Oxford: Hart Publishing) pp. 137–69.Google Scholar
Nimmer, R. T. (2001) “Understanding Electronic Contracting: UCITA, E-Signature, Federal, State, and Foreign Regulations 2001”, PLI/PAT 649: 15.
Ponte, L. M. (2001) “Throwing Bad Money After Bad: Can Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Really Deliver the Goods for the Unhappy Internet Shopper?” Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 3: 55.Google Scholar
Rabinovich-Einy, O. (Spring 2006) “Technology's Impact: The Quest for a New Paradigm for Accountability in Mediation”, Harvard Negotiation Law Review 11: 253.Google Scholar
“Recent International Agreement: Private International Law – Civil Procedure – Hague Conference Approves Uniform Rules of Enforcement for International Forum Selection Clauses – Convention as Choice of Court Agreements, concluded June, 30, 2005” (January 2006) Harvard Law Review 119: 931, available at h/r.rubystudio.com/media/pdf/hague_conference.pdf.
Reese, W. L. M. and Green, R. S. (1953) “That Elusive Word, ‘Residence’”, Vanderbilt Law Review 6: 561.
Reidenberg, J. (2005) “Technology and Internet Jurisdiction”, 153 University of Pennsylvania Law Review1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, D. T. (Fall 2000) “Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: Which Law and Forum apply to Securities Transactions on the Internet?”, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 21: 585.
Rice, D. T. (2004) “Problems in Running a Global Internet Business: Complying with the Laws of Other Countries”, PLI/PAT 797: 11.
Rice, D. T. and Gladstone, J. (2003) “An Assessment of the Effects Test in Determining Personal Jurisdiction in Cyberspace”, Business Lawyer 58: 601.Google Scholar
Rosner, N. (2004) “International Jurisdiction in European Union E-Commerce Contracts”, in Kinsella, N. S. and Simpson, A. F. (eds.), Online Contract Formation (New York, NY: Oceana Publications, Inc.), p. 481.Google Scholar
Scoles, E. F., Hay, P., Borchers, P. J. and Symeonides, S. C. (2000) Conflict of Laws (St. Paul, MN: West Group, 3rd edn.).Google Scholar
Smith, G. J. H. (2002) Internet Law and Regulation (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 3rd edn.).Google Scholar
Spencer, B. (2006) “Jurisdiction and the Internet: Returning to Traditional Principles to Analyze Network-Mediated Contacts”, University of Illinois Law Review 71.Google Scholar
Stone, R. (2005) The Modern Law of Contract (London: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 6th edn.).Google Scholar
Sun, N. S. and Du, T. (eds.) (2006) Contemporary Private International Law Research: China and Private International Law in the 21st Century (Shanghai: Shanghai People Publishing). 孙南申与杜涛主编, 当代国际私法研究 : 21世纪的中国与国际私法 (上海 : 上海人民出版社,2006).
Symeonides, S. C. (Fall 2006) “Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2006: Twentieth Annual Survey”, American Journal of Comparative Law, 54: 697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, K. (2002) “Jurisdiction in Matters relating to Contract: Article 5 (1) of the Brussels Convention and Regulation”, European Law Review 27(5): 530.Google Scholar
Tan, P. (2001) “E-com Legal Guide Hongkong” (Baker & McKenzie) available at www.bakerinfo.com/apec/hongkong_main.htm (last visited on 6 February 2005).
Tao, J. (2005) Resolving Business Disputes in China, Asia Business Law Series (Netherlands: Kluwer Law International).Google Scholar
Traynor, M. and Pirri, L. (2002) “Personal Jurisdiction and the Internet: Emerging Trends and Future Directions”, PLI/Pat 712: 93.
Trooboff, P. D. (23 July 2001) “International Law: the Hague Conference”, The National Law Journal, available at www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/Covington.pdf (last visited on 17 August 2009).
Tu, G. (Spring 2007) “The Hague Choice of Court Convention: A Chinese Perspective”, American Journal of Comparative Law, 55: 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunkel, D. and York, S. (2000) E-commerce: A Guide to the Law of Electronic Business (London: Butterworths, 2nd edn.).Google Scholar
Wang, F. (April 2006) “Domain Names Management and Legal Protection”, International Journal of Information Management, 26(2): 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, F. (2008) “Obstacles and Solutions to Internet Jurisdiction: A Comparative Analysis of the EU and US Laws”, Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 3(4): 233.Google Scholar
Wang, F. (2009) Online Dispute Resolution: Technology, Management and Legal Practice from an International Perspective (Oxford: Chandos Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Wei, C. K. and Suling, J. C. (2006) “United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts – A New Global Standard”, Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 18: 116.Google Scholar
Wilderspin, M. (2008) “The Rome I Regulation: Communitarisation and Modernisation of the Rome Convention”, ERA Forum 9: 259 (ERA: Academy of European Law).
Yeo, T. M. (2004) Choice of Law for Equitable Doctrines (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Zhang, M. (Winter 2006) “Choice of Law in Contracts: A Chinese ApproachNorthwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 26: 289.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Faye Fangfei Wang, Bournemouth University
  • Book: Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law
  • Online publication: 03 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762826.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Faye Fangfei Wang, Bournemouth University
  • Book: Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law
  • Online publication: 03 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762826.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Faye Fangfei Wang, Bournemouth University
  • Book: Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law
  • Online publication: 03 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762826.016
Available formats
×