Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T21:18:02.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Chinese legislation on jurisdiction

from PART II - Jurisdiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Faye Fangfei Wang
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University
Get access

Summary

Although China is one of the largest export countries in the world and also has a significant amount of cross-border electronic commercial transactions, it currently has no single private international law. In the absence of a uniform statute on private international law, the basic jurisdictional rules in Chinese national laws, such as the Contract Law of the People's Republic of China (hereafter “the contract Law of China” or “CLC”) and the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China (hereafter “Civil Procedure Law”), are the primary sources. Some subject-specific civil or commercial laws, such as the Foreign Trade Law of the People's Republic of China (hereafter “Foreign Trade Law”), may include provisions that direct the determination of jurisdiction and applicable law in foreign-related commercial and civil matters. Some special judicial arrangements between Hong Kong and mainland China or between Macao and mainland China, such as “the Arrangement between the Mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region on Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of the Decisions of Civil and Commercial Cases under Consensual Jurisdiction” of 2008 (hereafter the “China and Hong Kong Arrangement”) and “the Arrangement between the Mainland and Macao Special Administrative Region on the Mutual Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments” in 2006 are also important to facilitate judicial certainty and stimulate trade and cooperation between China and its special administrative regions.

The Chinese economic reform – socialism with Chinese characteristics (known as “Gai Ge Kai Fang” in Chinese) – was started in 1978.

Type
Chapter
Information
Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law
Legal Practices in the EU, US and China
, pp. 79 - 90
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×