Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 April 2019
Edited by
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Interpreting DiltheyCritical Essays, pp. 266 - 283Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Primary Sources
[GS] Gesammelte Schriften (1914–2006). Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner (previous publisher); Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht (current publisher).Google Scholar
GS 1: 1959. Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften: Versuch einer Grundlegung für das Studium der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte, ed. Groethuysen, B.. 4th edn.Google Scholar
GS 2: 1957. Weltanschauung und Analyse des Menschen seit Renaissance und Reformation, ed. Misch, G.. 5th edn.Google Scholar
GS 3: 1959. Studien zur Geschichte des Deutschen Geistes: Leibniz und sein Zeitalter. Friedrich der Grosse und die Deutschen Aufklärung. Das achtzehnte Jahrhundert und die geschichtliche Welt, ed. Ritter, P.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
GS 4: 1959. Die Jugendgeschichte Hegels und andere Abhandlungen zur Geschichte des deutschen Idealismus, ed. Nohl, H.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
GS 5: 1957. Die Geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens. Erste Hälfte: Abhandlungen zur Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaften, ed. Misch, G.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
GS 6: 1958. Die Geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens. Zweite Hälfte: Abhandlungen zur Poetik, Ethik und Pädagogik, ed. Misch, G.. 3rd edn.Google Scholar
GS 7: 1956. Der Aufbau der Geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften, ed. Groethuysen, B.. 2nd edn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GS 8: 1960. Weltanschauungslehre: Abhandlungen zur Philosophie der Philosophie, ed. Groethuysen, B.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
GS 9: 1960. Pädagogik: Geschichte und Grundlinien des Systems, ed. Bollnow, O.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
GS 11: 1960. Vom Aufgang des geschichtlichen Bewußtseins: Jugendaufsätze und Erinnerungen, ed. Weniger, E.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
GS 12: 1960. Zur Preussischen Geschichte: Schleiermachers politische Gesinnung und Wirksamkeit. Die Reorganisatoran des preussischen Staates. Das allgemeine Landrecht, ed. Weniger, E.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
GS 13: 1970. Leben Schleiermachers: Auf Grund des Textes der 1. Auflage von 1870 und der Zusätze aus dem Nachlaß, ed. Redeker, M..Google Scholar
GS 14: 1966. Leben Schleiermachers. Zweiter Band: Schleiermachers System als Philosophie und Theologie, ed. Redeker, M..Google Scholar
GS 15: 1970. Zur Geistesgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts: Portraits und biographische Skizzen. Quellenstudien und Literatur-Berichte zur Theologie und Philosophie, ed. Herrmann, U..Google Scholar
GS 16: 1972. Zur Geistesgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts: Aufsätze und Rezensionen aus Zeitungen und Zeitschriften 1859–1874, ed. Herrmann, U..Google Scholar
GS 17: 1974. Zur Geistesgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts: Aus “Westermanns Monatsheften”: Literaturbriefe, Berichte zur Kunstgeschichte, Verstreute Rezensionen 1867–1884, ed. Herrmann, U..Google Scholar
GS 18: 1977. Die Wissenschaften vom Menschen, der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte: Vorarbeiten zur Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften (1865–1880), ed. Johach, H. and Rodi, F..Google Scholar
GS 19: 1997. Grundlegung der Wissenschaften vom Menschen, der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte, ed. Johach, H. and Rodi, F.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
GS 20: 1990. Logik und System der Philosophischen Wissenschaften: Vorlesungen zur erkenntnistheoretischen Logik und Methodologie, ed. Lessing, H. and Rodi, F..Google Scholar
GS 21: 1997. Psychologie als Erfahrungswissenschaft. Erster Teil: Vorlesungen zur Psychologie und Anthropologie (1875–1894), ed. Kerckhoven, G. and Lessing, H.-U..Google Scholar
GS 22: 2005. Psychologie als Erfahrungswissenschaft. Zweiter Teil: Manuskripte zur Genese der deskriptiven Psychologie (ca. 1880–1896), ed. Lessing, H.-U. and van Kerckhoven, G..Google Scholar
GS 23: 2000. Allgemeine Geschichte der Philosophie. Vorlesungen 1900–1905, ed. Gebhardt, G. and Lessing, H.-U..Google Scholar
GS 24: 2004. Logik und Wert. Späte Vorlesungen, Entwürfe und Fragmente zur Strukturpsychologie, Logik und Wertlehre (ca. 1904–1911), ed. Kühne-Bertram, G..Google Scholar
GS 25: 2006. Dichter als Seher der Menschheit. Die geplante Sammlung literarhistorischer Aufsätze von 1895, ed. Malsch, G..Google Scholar
GS 26: 2005. Das Erlebnis und die Dichtung. Lessing – Goethe – Novalis – Hölderlin, ed. Malsch, G..Google Scholar
[B] Briefwechsel (2011–ongoing). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
B I: 2011. Wilhelm Dilthey: Briefwechsel. Band I: 1852–1882, ed. Kühne-Bertram, G. and Lessing, H.-U..Google Scholar
B II: 2014. Wilhelm Dilthey: Briefwechsel. Band II: 1882–1896, ed. Kühne-Bertram, G. and Lessing, H.-U..Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
1865. Grundriss der Logik und des Systems der philosophischen Wissenschaften. Berlin: Mittler. Republished in GS 20: 19–32.Google Scholar
1875. “Über das Studium der Geschichte der Wissenschaften vom Menschen, der Gesellschaft und den Staat.” Philosophische Monatsheften XI: 118–132. Republished in GS 5: 31–89.Google Scholar
1898. “Die drei Grundformen der Systeme in der ersten Hӓlfte des 19. Jahrhunderts.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie XI: 551–586. Republished in GS 4: 528–554.Google Scholar
1923. Briefwechsel zwischen Wilhelm Dilthey und dem Grafen Paul Yorck von Wartenburg, 1877–97, ed. Sigrid von der Schulenburg. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
1954. Die Große Phantasiedichtung und andere Studien zur vergleichenden Literaturgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
1957a. Von Deutscher Dichtung und Musik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
1957b. Das Erlebnis und die Dichtung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. Republished in GS 26.Google Scholar
1960. Der junge Dilthey: Ein Lebensbild in Briefen und Tagebüchern, 1852–187, ed. Misch, Clara. 2nd edn. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
1968. “Der Briefwechsel Dilthey und Husserl,” ed. Biemel, Walter. Man and World 3, 1: 428–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SW] Selected Works, ed. Makkreel, Rudolf and Rodi, Frithjof. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
SW I: 1989. Introduction to the Human Sciences.Google Scholar
SW II: 2010. Understanding the Human World.Google Scholar
SW III: 2002. The Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences.Google Scholar
SW IV: 1996. Hermeneutics and the Study of History.Google Scholar
SW V: 1985. Poetry and Experience.Google Scholar
SW VI: in press. Ethical and World-View Philosophy.Google Scholar
1961. Pattern and Meaning in History: Thoughts on History and Society, ed. Rickman, Hans Peter. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
1976. Dilthey: Selected Writings, trans. Rickman, Hans Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1977. Descriptive Psychology and Historical Understanding, trans. Zaner, R. M. and Heiges, K. I.. Intro. Makkreel, R.. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Amaral, Nazaré de Camargo Pacheco. 1996. “Sozialethik bei Dilthey und Schleiermacher.” Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 10: 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto. 1984. Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto. 1998. Towards a Transformation of Philosophy. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Arthos, J. 2000. “To Be Alive When Something Happens: Retrieving Dilthey’s Erlebnis.” Janus Head 3, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, J. I. (Hans). 1999. “Wilhelm Dilthey: Classical Sociological Theorist.” Quarterly Journal of Ideology 22, 1: 43–82.Google Scholar
Bambach, Charles. 1995. Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. 2011. The German Historicist Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermes, Christian. 2004. “Welt” als Thema der Philosophie. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berner, Christian. 2014. “Wir verstehen nur Zusammenhang. A propos de la théorie des conceptions du monde chez Dilthey.” Lo Sguardo. Rivista di Filosofia 14: 35–45.Google Scholar
Bernhardi, Friedrich von. 1912. Germany and the Next War, trans. Powles, A.. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Bollnow, Otto. 1967. Dilthey: Eine Einführung in seine Philosophie. 3rd edn. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag.Google Scholar
Bouwsma, O. K. 1986. Wittgenstein: Conversations 1949–1951, ed. Craft, J. L. and Hustwit, Ronald E.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Bowler, P. J. 1976. “Malthus, Darwin, and the Concept of Struggle.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37, 4: 631–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braver, Lee. 2012. Groundless Grounds: A Study of Wittgenstein and Heidegger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braver, Lee. 2014. “Hermeneutics and Language Philosophy,” in Routledge Companion to Philosophical Hermeneutics, ed. Gander, Hans-Helmuth and Malpas, Jeff. New York: Routledge, 634–643.Google Scholar
Bruch, Rüdiger Vom, Graf, Friedrich Wilhelm, and Hübinger, Gangolf. 1989. Kultur und Kulturwissenschaften um 1900: Krise der Moderne und Glaube an die Wissenschaft. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Nils. 2007. Vom Kulturkritiker zum “Kulturkrieger.” Paul Natorps Weg in den “Krieg der Geister.” Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin. 1997. Israel and the World: Essays in a Time of Crisis. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin. 2001. Frühe kulturkritische und philosophische Schriften 1891–1924, ed. Mendes-Flohr, Paul and Treml, Martin. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlag-Haus.Google Scholar
Bulhof, Ilse Nina. 1980. Wilhelm Dilthey: A Hermeneutic Approach to the Study of History and Culture. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 2015. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. Guyer, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. 1976. Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chenari, Mahin. 2009. “Hermeneutics and Theory of Mind.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8, 1: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chladenius, Johann Martin. 1752. Allgemeine Geschichtswissenschaft. Leipzig: Friedrich Lanckischen.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corngold, Stanley. 1981. “Dilthey’s Essay The Poetic Imagination: A Poetics of Force.” Interpretation 9, 2–3: 301–337.Google Scholar
Corngold, Stanley. 1994. The Fate of the Self: German Writers and French Theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Crowe, Benjamin. 2005. “Dilthey’s Philosophy of Religion in the ‘Critique of Historical Reason’: 1880–1910.” Journal of the History of Ideas 66: 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damböck, Christian. 2012. “Wilhelm Dilthey’s Empirische Philosophie und der rezente Methodenstreit in der analytischen Philosophie.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 85, 1: 151–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damböck, Christian. 2017. Deutscher Empirismus: Studien zur Philosophie im deutschsprachigen Raum 1830–1930. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Anna, Giuseppe, Johach, Helmut, and Nelson, Eric S., eds. 2013. Anthropologie und Geschichte: Studien zu Wilhelm Dilthey aus Anlass seines 100 Todestages. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1873. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
de Mul, Jos. 1997. “Structuralist and Hermeneutic Approaches to Development,” in Philosophy of Development: Reconstructing the Foundations of Human Development and Education, ed. van Haaften, A. W., Korthals, M., and Wren, T.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Mul, Jos. 2004. The Tragedy of Finitude: Dilthey’s Hermeneutics of Life, trans. Burrett, Tony. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
de Mul, Jos. 2010. Cyberspace Odyssey: Towards a Virtual Ontology and Anthropology. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
de Mul, Jos. 2013. “Understanding Nature: Dilthey, Plessner and Biohermeneutics,” in Anthropologie und Geschichte: Studien zu Wilhelm Dilthey aus Anlass seines 100. Todestages̈, ed. D’Anna, Johach, and Nelson, 459–478.Google Scholar
de Vignemont, F. and Singer, T.. 2006. “The Empathic Brain: How, When and Why?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 435–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dilthey, Katharina. 1922. “Eine Erinnerung an Henrik Ibsen.” Westermanns illustrierte deutsche Monatshefte (December): 362–364.Google Scholar
Droysen, Johann Gustav. 1977. Historik: Die Vorlesungen von 1857, ed. Leyh, Peter. Stuttgart – Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Dvash, J. and Shamay-Tsoory, S. G.. 2014. “Theory of Mind and Empathy as Multidimensional Constructs: Neurological Foundations.” Topics in Language Disorders 34, 4: 282–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ermarth, Michael. 1978. Wilhelm Dilthey: The Critique of Historical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fischer-Tiné, Harald. 2015. “The Other Side of Internationalism: Switzerland as a Hub of Militant Anti-Colonialism 1910–1920,” in Colonial Switzerland: Rethinking Colonialism from the Margins, ed. Purtschert, P. and Fischer-Tiné, H.. London: Palgrave, 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flasch, Kurt. 1991. “Abschied von Dilthey. Historisches Wissen ohne Verstehen,” in Filosofía e cultura: Per Eugenio Garin, vol. II, ed. Ciliberto, M. and Vasoli, C.. Rome: Riuniti, 625–645.Google Scholar
Flasch, Kurt. 2000. Die geistige Mobilmachung. Die deutschen Intellektuellen und der Erste Weltkrieg. Berlin: Alexander Fest Verlag.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. 2010. After Herder: Philosophy of Language in the German Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. 2011a. “Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Critical Appraisal.” Mythos-Magazin, July 2011. www.mythos-magazin.de/erklaerendehermeneutik/mf_gadamer.htm.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. 2011b. German Philosophy of Language: From Schlegel to Hegel and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, Michael N. 2012. “Dilthey’s Significance for Hermeneutics.” Mythos-Magazin, May 2012. www.mythos-magazin.de/erklaerendehermeneutik/mf_dilthey.pdf.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. 2013. “Hypothesis in Natural Science and Interpretation,” in Naturalistische Hermeneutik: Ein neues Paradigma des Verstehens und Interpretierens, ed. Madonna, L. C.. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2003. Society Must Be Defended, trans. Macey, D.. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Frischeisen-Köhler, Max. 1911. Weltanschauung: Philosophie und Religion in Darstellung. Berlin: Verlag Reichl and Co.Google Scholar
Frischeisen-Köhler, Max. 1915. Das Problem des ewigen Friedens: Betrachtungen über das Wesen und die Bedeutung des Krieges. Berlin: Mittler und Sohn.Google Scholar
Frischeisen-Köhler, Max. 1917. “Philosophie und Pädagogik.” Kant-Studien 22, 1–2: 27–80.Google Scholar
Frischeisen-Köhler, Max. 1921. Bildung und Weltanschauung: eine Einführung in die pädagogischen Theorien. Charlottenburg: Mundus-Verl.-Anst.Google Scholar
Fulsås, Narve and Kühne-Bertram, Gudrun. 2009. “Ibsen and Dilthey: Evidence of a Forgotten Acquaintance.” Ibsen Studies 9, 1: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. “The Problem of Historical Consciousness.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 5, 1: 8–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1986a. Gesammelte Werke, vol. I (Wahrheit und Methode). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, 1986b. “Das Problem der Geschichte in der neueren deutschen Philosophie” (1943), in Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Gesammelte Werke, vol. II (Wahrheit und Methode: Ergänzungen). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 27–36.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1987. “Das Problem Diltheys: Zwischen Romantik und Positivismus,” in Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Gesammelte Werke, vol. IV (Neuere Philosophie II). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 406–424.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, 1993. “Die Aktualität des Schönen” [1974], in Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Gesammelte Werke, vol. VIII (Ästhetik und Poetik: Kunst als Aussage). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 94–142.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1995. Gesammelte Werke, vol. X (Hermeneutik in Rückblick). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2001. Das Problem des historischen Bewusstseins. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Truth and Method, trans. Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2007. Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of the Later Writings, ed. Palmer, Richard. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun. 2012. “Neurons, Neonates and Narrative: From Embodied Resonance to Empathic Understanding,” in Moving Ourselves, Moving Others, ed. Foolen, A., Lüdtke, U., Zlatev, J., and Racine, T.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167–196.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun. 2013a. “Empathy, Simulation and Narrative.” Science in Context 25, 3: 301–327.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun. 2013b. “The Socially Extended Mind.” Cognitive Systems Research 25–26: 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun and Hutto, Daniel. 2008. “Understanding Others through Primary Interaction and Narrative Practice,” in The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, ed. Zlatev, J., Racine, T., Sinha, C., and Itkonen, E.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, Vittorio. 2001. “The ‘Shared Manifold’ Hypothesis: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 33–50.Google Scholar
Garber, Marjorie. 2001. Academic Instincts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Geiger, M. 2010/2011. “Über das Wesen und die Bedeutung der Einfühlung,” in Kongress für experimentelle Psychologie, ed. Schumann, F.. Leipzig: Verlag J. A. Barth, 29–73.Google Scholar
Geiger, M. 2015. “On the Essence and Meaning of Empathy Parts I and II.” trans. Gödel, F. and Aragonaas, M.. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neurosciences 8, 1: 19–31.Google Scholar
Gier, Nicholas F. 1981. Wittgenstein and Phenomenology: A Comparative Study of the Later Wittgenstein, Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Gjesdal, Kristin. 2013. “Enlightenment, History, and the Anthropological Turn: The Hermeneutical Challenge of Dilthey’s Schleiermacher Studies,” in D’Anna, Johach, and Nelson, eds., 323–355.Google Scholar
Glatz, Uwe B. 2001. Emil Lask: Philosophie im Verhältnis zu Weltanschauung, Leben und Erkenntnis. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang Von. 1961. Faust, trans. Kaufmann, Walter. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. 2006. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. 2011. “Two Routes to Empathy,” in Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, ed. Coplan, A. and Goldie., P. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grondin, Jean. 2014. “Do Gadamer and Ricoeur Have the Same Understanding of Hermeneutics?” in The Agon of Interpretations: Towards a Critical Intercultural Hermeneutics, ed. Xie, M.. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests, trans. Shapiro, Jeremy J.. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, A. 2001. “Dilthey, Empathy and Verstehen: A Contemporary Reappraisal.” European Journal of Social Theory 4, 3: 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heal, Jane. 1995. “How to Think about Thinking,” in Mental Simulation: Evaluations and Applications, ed. Davies, M. and Stone, T.. Oxford: Blackwell, 33–52.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1970. Werke in 20 Bänden, ed. Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1975. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, vol. I and vol. II, trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 2014. Lectures on the Philosophy of Art: The Hotho Transcript of the 1823 Berlin Lectures, ed. and trans. Brown, Robert F.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. London: SCM Press/New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1985. History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena, trans. Kisiel, Theodore. J.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1992/1993. “Wilhelm Dilthey’s Forschungsarbeit und der gegenwärtige Kampf um eine historische Weltanschauung: 10 Vorträge, gehalten in Kassel April 16–21, 1925.” Ed. Rodi, F.. Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 8: 143–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1993. Phänomenologie der Anschauung und des Ausdrucks: Theorie der philosophischen Begriffsbildung. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1999. Ontology: Hermeneutics of Facticity, trans. van Buren, John. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2001. Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research, trans. Rojcewicz, Richard. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2002. Supplements: From the Earliest Essays to Being and Time and Beyond, ed. van Buren, John. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2004. Der Begriff der Zeit (1924), Gesamtausgabe, vol. 64, ed. Friedrich‐Wilhelm von Herrmann. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2010. Phenomenology of Intuition and Expression: Theory of Philosophical Concept Formation, trans. Colony, Tracy. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2011. The Concept of Time: The First Draft of “Being and Time,” trans. Farin, Ingo. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1833. The Spirit of Hebrew Poetry, vols. I–II, trans. Marsh, James. Burlington, VA: Edward Smith.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1877. Sämmtliche Werke, vol. I, ed. Suphan, Bernhard Ludwig et al. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlag.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1985–1998. Werke in zehn Bänden, vol. II, ed. Bollacher, Martin et al. Frankfurt: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 2006. Selected Writings on Aesthetics, ed. and trans. Moore, Gregory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 2008. Shakespeare, ed. and trans. Moore, Gregory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Herfurth, Thomas. 1991. Diltheys Schriften zur Ethik: Der Aufbau der moralischen Welt als Resultat einer Kritik der introspektiven Vernunft. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm von. 2000. Hermeneutik und Reflexion. Der Begriff der Phänomenologie bei Heidegger und Husserl. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, Carl. 1954. Ranke und die Geschichtstheologie der Goethezeit. Göttingen: Musterschmidt.Google Scholar
Hodges, Herbert A. 1974. The Philosophy of Wilhelm Dilthey. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Hoeres, Peter. 2009. Krieg der Philosophen: Die deutsche und die britische Philosophie im Ersten Weltkrieg. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. 1939. “The Relation between Psychology and Sociology in the Work of Wilhelm Dilthey.” Studies in Philosophy and Social Science 8, 3: 430–443.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1904. “Über die Aufgabe des Geschichtsschreibers” (1821), in Gesammelte Schriften, vol. IV. Berlin: Behr’s Verlag.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1952. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch. Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution, Husserliana 4. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität I, Husserliana 13. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1977. Phenomenological Psychology: Summer Semester 1925, trans. Scanlon, John. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hvattum, Mari. 2004. Gottfried Semper and the Problem of Historicism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William. 1981. The Principles of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Juarrero-Roque, Alicia. 1985. “Self Organization: Kant’s Conception of Teleology and Modern Chemistry.” Review of Metaphysics 39, 1: 107–135.Google Scholar
Jung, Matthias. 2003/2004. “‘Das Leben artikuliert sich’: Diltheys performativer Begriff der Bedeutung Artikulation als Fokus hermeneutischen Denkens.” Revue international de philosophie 226, 3: 439–454.Google Scholar
Jung, Matthias. 2009. Der Bewusste Ausdruck: Anthropologie der Artikulation. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, Matthias. 2014. Wilhelm Dilthey zur Einführung, 2nd edn. Hamburg: Junius Verlag.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1902–1997. Kant’s Gesammelte Schriften, ed. The Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences, 29 volumes. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Often cited as AA (Akademie Ausgabe).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1965. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Critique of Judgment, trans. Pluhar, Werner S.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, ed. and trans. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2011. “Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime (1764).” trans. Guyer, Paul. In Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and Other Writings, ed. Frierson, Patrick and Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kerckhoven, Guy Van and Strube, Claudius. 1999/2000. “Lesespuren: Husserls und Heideggers Randbemerkungen zu Lebensphilosophie und Phänomenologie Georg Mischs Lebensphilosophie und Phänomenologie.” Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 12 (1999/2000): 144–214.Google Scholar
Kimmerle, Heinz. 1957. “Die Hermeneutik Schleiermachers im Zusammenhang seines spekulativen Denkens.” Dissertation, Universität Heidelberg, Philosophische Fakultät.Google Scholar
Klemperer, Victor. 2013. The Language of the Third Reich, trans. Brady, M.. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Krell, David F. 1992. Daimon Life: Heidegger and Life-Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kross, Matthias. 1995. “‘Kritik der ethischen Vernunft.’ Zu Wilhelm Diltheys Vorlesung ‘System der Ethik’ aus dem Jahre 1890.” Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 9: 235–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. 1987. Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768–1800: A Contribution to the History of Critical Philosophy. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
La Vergata, Antonello. 1990. L’equilibrio e la guerra della natura. Dalla Teologia Naturale al Darwinismo. Naples: Morano.Google Scholar
Lange, Helene. 2000. Helene Lange und Gertrud Bäumer: Eine politische Lebensgemeinschaft. Köln: Böhlau Köln.Google Scholar
Lederer, Emil. 1979. Kapitalismus, Klassenstruktur und Probleme der Demokratie in Deutschland 1919–1940. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonhard, Jörn. 2008. Bellizismus und Nation: Kriegsdeutung und Nationsbestimmung in Europa und den Vereinigten Staaten 1750–1914. Munich: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold E. 1962. Hamburg Dramaturgy, trans. Zimmern, Helen. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold E. 1984. Laocoön: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry, trans. McCormick, Edward Allen. Baltimore, MA: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold E. 1985. Werke und Briefe in Zwölf Bänden, ed. Barner, Wilfried et al. Frankfurt: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Lessing, Hans-Ulrich. 1984. Die Idee einer Kritik der Historischen Vernunft: Wilhelm Diltheys Erkenntnistheoretisch-Logisch-Methodologische Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaften. Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Lessing, Hans-Ulrich. 2003. “Historische Aufklärung und Geschichtlichkeit: Zur Rezeption von Diltheys Begriffswelt in Gadamers philosophischer Hermeneutik.” Archiv für Begreiffsgeschichte 45: 21–43.Google Scholar
Lessing, Hans-Ulrich. 2011. Wilhelm Dilthey: Eine Einführung. Köln: UTB-Böhlau Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessnoff, Michael. 1994. “Dilthey,” in Routledge History of Philosophy: The Nineteenth Century, ed. Ten, C. L.. London: Routledge, 206–242.Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor. 1907. “Das Wissen von fremden Ichen,” in Lipps, Theodor, Psychologische Untersuchungen I. Leipzig: Engelmann, 694–722.Google Scholar
Löwith, Karl. 1981. Mensch und Menschenwelt: Beitrage zur Anthropologie. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. 1965. Die Theorie des Romans. Ein geschichtsphilosophischer Versuch über die Formen der großen Epik. Munich: Luchterhand Verlag.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. 1978. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature, trans. Bostock, Anna. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
Madzia, Roman and Jung, Matthias. 2015. “Wilhelm Dilthey’s Philosophie der Verkörperung.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 63, 6: 1001–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1969. “Wilhelm Dilthey and the Neo-Kantians: The Distinction of the Geisteswissenschaften and the Kulturwissenschaften.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 7, 4: 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1990a. “The Genesis of Heidegger’s Phenomenological Hermeneutics and the Rediscovered ‘Aristotle Introduction’ of 1922.” Man and World 23, 3: 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1990b. “Traditional Historicism, Contemporary Interpretations of Historicity, and the History of Philosophy.” New Literary History 21, 4: 977–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1992. Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Studies, 2nd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1994. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1996. “How Is Empathy Related to Understanding?” In Issues in Husserl’s Ideas II, ed. Nenon, Thomas and Embree, Lester, 199–212. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2000. “From Simulation to Structural Transposition: A Diltheyan Critique of Empathy and Defense of Verstehen,” in Empathy and Agency: The Problem of Understanding in the Human Sciences, ed. Kügler, Hans Herbert and Stueber, Karsten R., 181–193. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2003. “The Cognition-Knowledge Distinction in Kant and Dilthey and the Implications for Psychology and Self-Understanding.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34, 1: 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2013. “The Anthropological Import of Dilthey’s System of Ethics,” in Anthropologie und Geschichte: Studien zu Wilhelm Dilthey aus Anlass seines 100. Todestages̈, ed. D’Anna, Johach, and Nelson, 127–139.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2015. Orientation and Judgment in Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Scanlon, John, eds. 1987. Dilthey and Phenomenology. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. 1932. Hegels Ontologie und die Grundlegung einer Theorie der Geschichtlichkeit. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. 1987. Hegel’s Ontology and the Theory of Historicity, trans. Benhabib, Seyla. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marquard, Odo. 1973. Schwierigkeiten mit der Geschichtsphilosophie: Aufsätze. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Masson, Scott. 2004. Romanticism, Hermeneutics, and the Crisis of the Human Sciences. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
McGuinness, Brian. 2005. Young Ludwig: Wittgenstein’s Life 1889–1921. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, José. 2002. The Unity of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy: Necessity, Intelligibility, and Normativity. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinong, Alexius. 1968. Abhandlungen zur Werttheorie (Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, vol. III), ed. Haller, Rudolf et al. Graz: Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Menary, Richard A. 2010. “Introduction to the Special Issue on 4E Cognition.” Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 9, 4: 459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Hermann Julius, ed. 1897. Meyers Konversations-Lexikon, vol. XVII. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar
Misch, Georg. 1914. Vom Geist des Krieges und des deutschen Volkes barbarei; Rede gehalten in der aula der Universität Marburg. Jena: E. Diederichs.Google Scholar
Müller-Vollmer, Kurt. 1963. Towards a Phenomenological Theory of Literature: A Study of Wilhelm Dilthey’s “Poetik.”’ The Hague: Mounton and Co.Google Scholar
Murphey, Murray G. 2012. The Development of Quine’s Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1974. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” The Philosophical Review 83, 4: 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natorp, Paul. 1912. Allgemeine Psychologie nach kritische Methode, vol. I: Objekt und Methode der Psychologie. Tübingen: Siebeck.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul. 1918. “Bruno Bauchs Immanuel Kant und die Fortbildung des Systems des Kritischen Idealismus.” Kant-Studien 22, 1–2: 426–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naugle, David K. 2002. Worldview: The History of a Concept. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2007. “Empiricism, Facticity, and the Immanence of Life in Dilthey.” Pli: Warwick Journal of Philosophy 18: 108–128.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2008. “Interpreting Practice: Dilthey, Epistemology, and the Hermeneutics of Historical Life.” Idealistic Studies 38, 1–2: 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2010. “Impure Phenomenology: Dilthey, Epistemology, and Interpretive Psychology.” Studia Phenomenologica 10: 1–26.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2011a. “Self-Reflection, Interpretation, and Historical Life in Dilthey,” in Recent Contributions to Dilthey’s Philosophy of the Human Sciences, ed. Lessing, Hans-Ulrich, Makkreel, Rudolf A., and Pozzo, Riccardo. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2011b. “The World Picture and Its Conflict in Dilthey and Heidegger.” Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 18, 1: 19–38.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2013a. “Between Nature and Spirit: Naturalism and Anti-Naturalism in Dilthey,” in Anthropologie und Geschichte: Studien zu Wilhelm Dilthey aus Anlass seines 100. Todestages̈, ed. D’Anna, Johach, and Nelson, 141–160.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2013b. “Dilthey, Heidegger und die Hermeneutik des faktischen Lebens,” in Diltheys Werk und seine Wirkung, ed. Scholtz, Gunter. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 97–109.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2014. “Language, Psychology, and the Feeling of Life in Kant and Dilthey,” in The Linguistic Dimension of Kant’s Thought: Historical and Critical Essays, ed. Schalow, Frank and Velkley, Richard. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2015a. “Heidegger and Dilthey: Language, History and Hermeneutics,” in Horizons of Authenticity in Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Moral Psychology, ed. Pedersen, Hans and Altman, Megan. Dordrecht: Springer, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2015b. “Life and World,” in Routledge Companion to Philosophical Hermeneutics, ed. Malpas, Jeff and Gander, Hans-Helmuth. London: Routledge, 378–389.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2016a. “Heidegger and Dilthey: A Difference in Interpretation,” in The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger, ed. Raffoul, Francois and Nelson, Eric S.. London: Bloomsbury Press, 129–134.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2016b. “Heidegger’s Black Notebooks: National Socialism, Antisemitism, and the History of Being,” in The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger, ed. Raffoul, Francois and Nelson, Eric S.. London: Bloomsbury Press, 484–493.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2017. Chinese and Buddhist Philosophy in Early Twentieth-Century German Thought. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2018a. “Dilthey and Carnap: The Feeling of Life, the Scientific Worldview, and Eliminating Metaphysics,” in The Worlds of Positivism: A Global Intellectual History, 1770–1930, ed. Feichtinger, Johannes, Fillafer, Franz L., and Surman, Jan. New York: Palgrave, 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. 2018b. “Wilhelm Dilthey and the Formative-Generative Imagination,” in Stretching the Limits of Productive Imagination, ed. Geniusas, Saulius. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 23–46.Google Scholar
Nenon, Tom. 1995. “Hermeneutical Truth and the Structure of Human Experience: Gadamer’s Critique of Dilthey,” in The Specter of Relativism: Truth, Dialogue, and “Phronesis” in Philosophical Hermeneutics, ed. Schmidt, Lawrence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 39–55.Google Scholar
Neurath, Marie, ed. 1973. Empiricism and Sociology: The Life and Work of Otto Neurath. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1874. Unzeitgemӓsses Betrachtungen. Zweites Stück: Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der Historie fϋr das Leben. Leipzig: Fritzsch.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1980. Sӓmtliche Werke, Kritische Studienausgabe, ed. Colli, Giorgo and Montinari, Mazzino. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2007. On the Genealogy of Morality, ed. Answell-Pearson, Keith and trans. Diethe, Carol, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher. 2000. Minding the Gap: Epistemology and Philosophy of Science in the Two Traditions. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, José. 1946. Concord and Liberty, trans. Weyl, Helene. New York: Norton Books.Google Scholar
Owensby, Jacob. 1994. Dilthey and the Narrative of History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pick, Daniel. 1993. War Machine: The Rationalisation of Slaughter in the Modern Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse. 2011. “Against Empathy.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 49, Sup. 1: 214–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1992. Renewing Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W.V. 1976. The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. Revised edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ranke, Leopold von. 1824. Zur Kritik neuerer Geschichtsschreiber: Eine Beylage zu desselben romanischen und germanischen Geschichten. Leipzig: Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranke, Leopold von. [1824] 1874. Geschichte der romanischen und germanischen Völker von 1494 bis 1514, in Sӓmtliche Werke, vol. XXXIII/XXXIV, ed. Dove, Alfred. Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Ranke, Leopold von. 1975. Aus Werk und Nachlaβ, ed. Dotterweich, Volker and Fuchs, Walther Peter. Munich: Oldenbourgh.Google Scholar
Reid, James. 2001. “Dilthey’s Epistemology of the Geisteswissenschaften: Between Lebensphilosophie and Wissenschaftstheorie.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39, 3: 407–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickert, Heinrich. 1920. Die Philosophie des Lebens: Darstellung und Kritik der philosophischen Modeströmungen unserer Zeit. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.Google Scholar
Rickman, Hans Peter. 1979. Wilhelm Dilthey: Pioneer of the Human Studies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1973. The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics, ed. Ihde., Don Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Rodi, Frithjof. 1986/1987. “Die Bedeutung Diltheys für die Konzeption von Sein und Zeit.” Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 4: 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodi, Frithjof. 1990. Erkenntnis des Erkannten. Zur Hermeneutik des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Rodi, Frithjof. 2003. “Drei Bemerkungen zu Diltheys Aufsatz ‘Die Entstehung der Hermeneutik’.” Revue international de philosophie 57, 226 (4): 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodi, Frithjof. 2015. Über die Erfahrung von Bedeutsamkeit. Freiburg: Karl Alber Verlag.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alex. 2001. “How Is Biological Explanation Possible?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52, 4: 735–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 1987. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 1991. “Interpretation in Natural and Human Science,” in The Interpretive Turn, ed. Hiley, David R. et al. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 42–56.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph, ed. 1996. Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 2002. “Quinean Indeterminacy and Its Implications for Naturalism,” in How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 106–134.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 2015. Articulating the World: Conceptual Understanding and the Scientific Image. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1937. “Preface to the Second Edition,” in Russell, Bertrand, A Critical Exposition to the Philosophy of Leibniz. London: Georg Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Rutter, Benjamin. 2010. Hegel on the Modern Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santayana, George. 1896/1955. The Sense of Beauty: Being an Outline of Aesthetic Theory. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons/Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Schaser, Angelika. 2000. Helene Lange und Gertrud Bäumer: Eine Politische Lebensgemeinschaft. Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Scharff, Robert. 2011. “Displacing Epistemology: Being in the Midst of Technoscientific Practice.” Foundations of Science 16, 2: 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharff, Robert. 2013. “Becoming a Philosopher: What Heidegger Learned from Dilthey, 1919–25.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21, 1: 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharff, Robert. 2014. How History Matters to Philosophy: Reconsidering Philosophy’s Past after Positivism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharff, Robert. 2018. Heidegger Becoming Phenomenological: Interpreting Husserl through Dilthey, 1916–1925. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schilbach, Leonhard, Timmermans, Bert, Reddy, Vasudevi, Costall, Alan, Bente, Gary, Schlicht, Tobias, and Vogeley, Kai. 2013. “Toward a Second-Person Neuroscience.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36, 4: 393–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. 1967. Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, vol. II, ed. Behler, Ernst. München: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. 2003. “Letter about the Novel (1799),” in Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics, ed. Bernstein, J[ay]. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst. 1982. “On the Different Methods of Translation,” in German Romantic Criticism, ed. Willson, A. Leslie. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst. 1986. Hermeneutics: The Handwritten Manuscripts, ed. Kimmerle, H. and trans. Duke, J. and Forstmann, J.. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst. 1998. Hermeneutics and Criticism, ed. Bowie, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1996. The Concept of the Political, trans. Schwab, George. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schnädelbach, Herbert. 1984. Philosophie in Deutschland 1831–1933. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Simmel, George. 1999. “Deutschlands innere Wandlung,” Der Krieg und die geistigen Entscheidungen. In Simmel, George, Gesamtausgabe, vol. XVI. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 7–58.Google Scholar
Simpson, Christopher. 1994. Science of Coercion: Communication Research and Psychological Warfare, 1945–1960. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. 2014. “The Place of Quine in Analytic Philosophy,” in A Companion to W. V. O. Quine, ed. Harman, Gilbert and Lepore, Ernest. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 432–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmaier, Werner. 1992. Philosophie der Fluktuanz. Dilthey und Nietzsche. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Edith. 2012. On the Problem of Empathy, trans. Stein, Waltraut. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Stern, Paul. 1897. Einfühlung und Assoziation in der neueren Ästhetik. Hamburg: L. Voss.Google Scholar
Stöcker, Helene. 2015. Lebenserinnerungen: Die unvollendete Autobiographie einer frauenbewegten Pazifistin. Köln: Böhlau Köln.Google Scholar
Strock, Joachim W. and Kisiel, Theodore. 1992/1993. “Martin Heidegger und die Anfänge der Deutschen Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte. Eine Dokumentation.” Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 8: 181–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stueber, Karsten R. 2006. Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk-Psychology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stueber, Karsten R. 2008. “Reasons, Generalizations, Empathy, and Narratives: The Epistemic Structure of Action Explanation.” History and Theory 47, 1: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stueber, Karsten R. 2012. “Varieties of Empathy, Neuroscience and the Narrativist Challenge to the Contemporary Theory of Mind Debate.” Emotion Review 4, 1: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1980. “Understanding in Human Science.” Review of Metaphysics 34, 1: 25–38.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1985a. Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1985b. Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Throop, C. J. 2008. “On the Problem of Empathy: The Case of Yap, Federated States of Micronesia.” Ethos 36, 4: 402–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchener, Edward B. 1909. Lectures on the Experimental Psychology of Thought-Processes. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn. 1979. “Communication and Cooperation in Early Infancy: A Description of Primary Intersubjectivity,” in Before Speech: The Beginning of Human Communication, ed. Bullowa, Margaret. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 321–347.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn and Hubley, Penelope. 1978. “Secondary Intersubjectivity: Confidence, Confiding and Acts of Meaning in the First Year,” in Action, Gesture, and Symbol: The Emergence of Language, ed. Lock, Andrew. London: Academic Press, 183–229.Google Scholar
Troeltsch, Ernst. 1915. “Der Kulturkrieg. Rede am 1. Juli 1915,” in Deutsche Reden in schwerer Zeit, vol. III. Berlin: Carl Heymanns, 207–249.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas. 2010. “Opposition to Verstehen in Orthodox Logical Empiricism,” in Historical Perspectives on Erklären and Verstehen, ed. Feest, Uljana. Dordrecht: Springer, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan, and Ross, Eleanor. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vischer, Robert. 1893. Über ästhetische Naturbetrachtung. Leipzig: Deutsche Rundschau.Google Scholar
Wagner, Klaus. 1906. Krieg: eine politisch-entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Jena: Costenoble.Google Scholar
Weingart, Peter. 1995. “‘Struggle for Existence’: Selection and Retention of a Metaphor,” in Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors, ed. Maasen, Sabine, Mendelsohn, Everett, and Weingart, Peter. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Gail. 1991. “Dilthey’s Conception of Objectivity in the Human Studies: A Reply to Gadamer.” Man and the World 24, 4: 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellek, René. 1966. A History of Modern Criticism 1750–1950, vols. I–V. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. 1765. Reflections on the Painting and Sculpture of the Greeks, trans. Fuseli, Henry. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969a. On Certainty, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H. and trans. Paul, Denis and Anscombe, G. E. M.. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969b. The Blue and Brown Books: Preliminary Studies for the “Philosophical Investigations.” New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1970. Zettel, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H. and trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1975. Philosophical Remarks, ed. Rhees, Rush. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1978. Remarks on Colour, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and trans. McAlister, Linda L. and Schättle, Margarete. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1980a. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. II, ed. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, Heikki and trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, Maximilian A. E.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1980b. Wittgenstein’s Lectures: Cambridge, 1930–1932, ed. Lee, Desmond. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1982. Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. I: Preliminary Studies for Part 2 of “Philosophical Investigations,” ed. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, Heikki and trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, Maximilian A. E.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1983. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, ed. von Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe, G. E. M.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1992. Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. II: The Inner and the Outer, ed. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, Heikki and trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, Maximilian A. E.. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1993. Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951, ed. Klagge, James and Nordmann, Alfred. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001a. Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001b. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001c. Wittgenstein’s Lectures: Cambridge, 1932–1935, ed. Ambrose, Alice. Amherst, MA: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2005. Philosophical Grammar, ed. Rhees, Rush and trans. Kenney, Anthony. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2005. Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2009. “Review of Evan Thompson. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind.” Husserl Studies 25: 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2010. “Empathy, Embodiment and Interpersonal Understanding: From Lipps to Schutz.” Inquiry 53, 3: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2014a. “Empathy and Other-Directed Intentionality.” Topoi 33, 1: 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2014b. Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zöckler, Christofer. 1975. Dilthey und die Hermeneutik: Diltheys Begründungen der Hermeneutik als Praxiswissenschaft und die Geschichte ihrer Rezeption. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar