Adams, Robert. 1994. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Allison, H. 1987. Benedict de Spinoza: An Introduction. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas St. 1964–6. Summa Theologiae. 60 vols. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar

Audi, Robert, ed. 1999. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Balibar, Etienne. 1998. Spinoza and Politics, trans. Peter Snowden and introduction by Warren Montag. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Barker, H. 1938. “Notes on the Second Part of Spinoza's Ethics (I).” In Studies in Spinoza: Critical and Interpretive Essays, ed. Kashap, Paul, 101–22. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bayle, P. 1965. Historical and Critical Dictionary, ed. Popkin, R.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. 1984. A Study of Spinoza's Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Bennett, J.1991. “Spinoza's Monism: A Reply to Curley.” In God and Nature in Spinoza's Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu, Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences, 53–9. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Bennett, J.1996. “Spinoza's Metaphysics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, ed. Garrett, Don, 61–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. 2001. Learning from Six Philosophers. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blom, Hans W. 1995. Morality and Causality in Politics: The Rise of Naturalism in Dutch Seventeenth-Century Political Thought. Dissertation, University of Utecht.

Boxhornius, M. Z. 1657. Institutiones politicae. Amsterdam: n.p.Google Scholar

Brett, Annabel, Tully, James and Hamilton-Bleakley, Holly, eds. 2006. Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgersduik, Franco. 1686. Idea politica, ed. Hornius, Georg. Leiden: Felix Lopes de Haro.Google Scholar

Carriero, J. 1995. “On the Relationship Between Mode and Substance in Spinoza's Metaphysics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33: 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, A. 1991. “The Materiality of Morals.” Studia Spinozana 7: 69–92.Google Scholar

Cover, J. A., and Kulstad, Mark, eds. 1990. Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin. 1969. Spinoza's Metaphysics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1972. “Roots of Contingency.” In Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Frankfurt, Harry, 69–97. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1973. “Experience in Spinoza's Theory of Knowledge.” In Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Grene, Marjorie, 354–76. Garden City: Doubleday/Anchor.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1975. “Descartes, Spinoza and the Ethics of Belief.” In Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation, ed. Mandelbaum, Maurice and Freeman, Eugene, 159–89. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1988. Behind the Geometrical Method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1990a. “Notes on a Neglected Masterpiece (II): The Theological-Political Treatise as a Prolegomenon to the Ethics.” In Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Cover, J. A. and Kulstad, Mark, 109–60. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1990b. “On Bennett's Spinoza: The Issue of Teleology.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, ed. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François, 39–52. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1991. “On Bennett's Interpretation of Spinoza's Monism.” In God and Nature in Spinoza's Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu, Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences, 35–51. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1996. “Kissinger, Spinoza and Genghis Khan.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, ed. Garrett, Don, 315–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin, and Moreau, Pierre-François, eds. 1990. Spinoza: Issues and Directions. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin, and Gregory M. Walski. 1999. “Spinoza's Necessitarianism Reconsidered.” In New Essays on the Rationalists, ed. Gennaro, Rocco and Huenemann, Charles, 241–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

D'Allonnes, M. R., and Rizk, H., eds. 1994. Spinoza: puissance et ontologie. Paris: Editions Kime.Google Scholar

Court, Johan. 1662. Consideratien van Staat, 4th edn. Amsterdam: n.p.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1981. Spinoza: Philosophie pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 1996. Representation and the Mind–Body Problem in Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael.2002. “Spinoza's Substance Monism.” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, ed. Koistinen, Olli and Biro, John, 11–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael.2003a. “The Power of an Idea: Spinoza's Critique of Pure Will.” Nous 37: 200–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael.2003b. “A Rationalist Manifesto: Spinoza and the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Philosophical Topics 31: 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael.Forthcoming in Mind. “Spinoza and the Metaphysics of Skepticism.”

Uyl, Douglas. 1983. Power, State and Freedom: An Interpretation of Spinoza. Assen: van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Descartes, René. 1974. Oeuvres de Descartes. 11 vols., ed. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. Paris: J. Vrin, 1964–74.Google Scholar

Donagan, Alan. 1988. Spinoza, New York: Harvester.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry, ed. 1972. Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry,1999. Necessity, Volition and Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Funkenstein, Amos. 1986. Theology and the Scientific Imagination. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel. 2004. “Dr. Fischelson's Dilemma: Spinoza on Freedom and Sociability.” In Ethica IV: Spinoza on Reason and the “Free Man,” ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu and Segal, Gideon, Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences, 183–207. New York: Little Room Press.Google Scholar

Garret, Don. 1991. “Spinoza's Necessitarianism.” In God and Nature in Spinoza's Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu, Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences, 191–218. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Garret, Don.1994. “ ‘A Free Man Always Acts Honestly, Not Deceptively’: Freedom and the Good in Spinoza's Ethics.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, ed. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François, 221–38. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Garret, Don.ed. 1996a. The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garret, Don.1996b. “Spinoza's Ethical Theory.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, ed. Garrett, Don, 267–314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garret, Don.1999. “Teleology in Spinoza and Early Modern Rationalism.” In New Essays on the Rationalists, ed. Gennaro, Rocco and Huenemann, Charles, 310–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Garret, Don.2001. “Spinoza's Conatus Argument,” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, ed. Koistinen, Olli and Biro, John, 127–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gatens, M. and Lloyd, G. 1999. Collective Imaginings: Spinoza, Past and Present, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gatens, M. and Lloyd, G.Unpublished. “Imagination, Religion and Morality: the Vicissitudes of Power in the Tractatus Theologico Politicus.”

Gennaro, Rocca, and Huenemann, Charles, eds. 1999. New Essays on the Rationalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grene, M., ed. 1973. Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, Garden City: Anchor/Doubleday.Google Scholar

Gueroult, M. 1968. Spinoza. 2 vols. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar

Hampshire, Stuart. 2005. Spinoza and Spinozism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1995. Lectures on the History of Philosophy. 3 vols., trans. E. S. Haldane and F. H. Simson. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, ed. Gaskin, J. C. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas.1994. Leviathan, the 1668 Latin edition, ed. and trans. Curley, Edwin. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas.1996. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas.1998. On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas.1999. Human Nature and De Corpore Politico, ed. Gaskin, J. C. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Kinch. 2006. “A Lion in the House: Hobbes and Democracy.” In Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, ed. Brett, Annabel, Tully, James and Hamilton-Bleakley, Holly, 191–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huenemann, Charlie. 2004. “Spinoza and Prime Matter.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42: 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, David. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd edn., ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Israel, Jonathan. 2006. Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joachim, H. H. 1940. A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Critique of Pure Reason, ed. Guyer, Paul and trans. Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kashap, Paul, ed. 1978. Studies in Spinoza: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kennington, Richard, ed. 1980. The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Koistinen, Olli, and Biro, John, eds. 2002. Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laerke, Mogens. [In press]. Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza. Paris: Honoré Champion.

Laux, Henri. 1993. Imagination et religion chez Spinoza. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1875–90. Die philosophischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz. 7 vols., ed. Gerhardt, C. I.. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1923–. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. ed. German Academy of Sciences. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1948. Textes inédits d'après les manuscrits de la Bibliothèque provinciale de Hanovre. 2 vols., ed. Grua, Gaston. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1952. Theodicy, trans. and ed. Huggard, E. M.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1967. The Leibniz–Arnauld Correspondence, trans. and ed. Mason, H. T.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1969. Philosophical Papers and Letters, trans. and ed. Loemker, Leroy E.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1982–. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Vorausedition zur Reihe VI (Philosophischen Schriften). ed. Leibniz-Forschungsstelle of the Universität Münster. Münster.

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1989. Philosophical Essays, trans. and ed. Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Levine, Michael P. 1994. Pantheism: A Non-Theistic Concept of Deity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Loeb, Louis. 1981. From Descartes to Hume. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Macherey, Pierre. 1979. Hegel ou Spinoza. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar

Macherey, Pierre.1994. Introduction à l'Ethique de Spinoza: La Cinquième Partie, les voies de la libération. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, Maurice, and Freeman, Eugene, eds. 1975. Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre. 1969. Individu et Communauté chez Spinoza. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre.1971. Le Christ et le salut des ignorants chez Spinoza. Paris: Aubier Montaigne.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre.1994. “L'Indignation et le conatus de l'état spinoziste.” In Spinoza: puissance et ontologie, ed. D'Allonnes, M. R. and Rizk, H.. Paris: Editions Kime.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre.1997. “Spinoza and Hobbes.” In The New Spinoza, ed. Montag, Warren and Stolze, Ted, 207–16. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Montag, Warren. 1999. Bodies, Masses, Power. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Montag, Warren, and Stolze, Ted, eds. 1997. The New Spinoza. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Moreau, P.-F. 1994. Spinoza: l'expérience et l'éternité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2002. Spinoza's Heresy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio. 1997. “Reliqua Desiderantur: A Conjecture for a Definition of a Concept of Democracy in the Final Spinoza.” In The New Spinoza, ed. Montag, Warren and Stolze, Ted, 219–47. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio, and Hardt, Michael. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Newlands, Samuel. Unpublished. “The Harmony of Spinoza and Leibniz”.

Nietzsche, F. W. 1973. Beyond Good and Evil, trans. and ed. Hollingdale, R. J.. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Owen, H. P. 1971. Concepts of Deity. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preus, J. Samuel. 2001. Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radner, Daisie. 1971. “Spinoza's Theory of Ideas.” The Philosophical Review 80: 338–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 1998. Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sleigh, Robert. 1990. Leibniz and Arnauld: A Commentary on their Correspondence. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sleigh, Robert.1996. “Leibniz's First Theodicy.” Nous 30 (supplement): 481–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sleigh, Robert.1999. “Leibniz on Freedom and Necessity: Critical Notice of Robert Adams, Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist.” Philosophical Review 108: 245–77.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven 1997. Spinoza, Liberalism, and the Question of Jewish Identity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus de. 1925. Spinoza Opera. 4 vols. (vol. 5, 1987), ed. Gebhardt, Carl. Hildesheim: Carl Winter.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus de.1985. The Collected Works of Spinoza. Vol. I, ed. and trans. Curley, Edwin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus.1995. The Letters, trans. Samuel Shirley, introduction and notes by Steven Barbone, Lee Rice and Jacob Adler. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus de.1999. Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Vol. III of the Spinoza Oeuvres, ed. Akkerman, F., Lagrée, J. and Moreau, P.-F.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus.2000. Political Treatise, trans. Samuel Shirley, introduction and notes by Steven Barbone and Lee Rice, with prefatory essay by Douglas Den Uyl. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus de.2002. Spinoza: Complete Works, ed. Morgan, Michael and trans. Shirley, Samuel. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Tosel, André. 1990. “Y-a-t-il une philosophie du progrès historique chez Spinoza?” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, ed. Moreau, P.-F. and Curley, E., 306–26. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. 2006. “Hobbes and democracy.” In Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, ed. Brett, Annabel, Tully, James and Hamilton-Bleakley, Holly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verbeek, Theo. 2003. Spinoza's Theologico-Political Treatise: Exploring the “Will of God.”London: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

Wansink, H. 1981. Politieke wetenschappen aan de Leidse universiteit, 1575–1650. Utrecht: n.p.Google Scholar

Wilson, Margaret. 1980. “Objects, Ideas, and ‘Minds.'” In The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza, ed. Kennington, Richard, 103–20. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Wolfson, H. A. 1934. The Philosophy of Spinoza. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Yovel, Yirmiyahu. 1985. “Spinoza: The Psychology of the Multitude and the Uses of Language.” Studia Spinozana 1: 305–33.Google Scholar

Yovel, Yirmiyahu.1989. Spinoza and Other Heretics, vol. I: The Marrano of Reason, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Yovel, Yirmiyahu.ed. 1994. Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind: Papers Presented at the Second Jerusalem Conference (Ethica II). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Yovel, Yirmiyahu, and Segal, Gideon, eds. 2004. Ethica IV: Spinoza on Reason and the “Free Man.” Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences. New York: Little Room Press.Google Scholar

Zac, Sylvain. 1991. “On the Idea of Creation in Spinoza.” In God and Nature in Spinoza's Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu, Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences, 231–41. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Adams, Robert. 1994. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Allison, H. 1987. Benedict de Spinoza: An Introduction. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas St. 1964–6. Summa Theologiae. 60 vols. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar

Audi, Robert, ed. 1999. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Balibar, Etienne. 1998. Spinoza and Politics, trans. Peter Snowden and introduction by Warren Montag. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Barker, H. 1938. “Notes on the Second Part of Spinoza's Ethics (I).” In Studies in Spinoza: Critical and Interpretive Essays, ed. Kashap, Paul, 101–22. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bayle, P. 1965. Historical and Critical Dictionary, ed. Popkin, R.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. 1984. A Study of Spinoza's Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Bennett, J.1991. “Spinoza's Monism: A Reply to Curley.” In God and Nature in Spinoza's Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu, Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences, 53–9. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Bennett, J.1996. “Spinoza's Metaphysics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, ed. Garrett, Don, 61–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. 2001. Learning from Six Philosophers. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blom, Hans W. 1995. Morality and Causality in Politics: The Rise of Naturalism in Dutch Seventeenth-Century Political Thought. Dissertation, University of Utecht.

Boxhornius, M. Z. 1657. Institutiones politicae. Amsterdam: n.p.Google Scholar

Brett, Annabel, Tully, James and Hamilton-Bleakley, Holly, eds. 2006. Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgersduik, Franco. 1686. Idea politica, ed. Hornius, Georg. Leiden: Felix Lopes de Haro.Google Scholar

Carriero, J. 1995. “On the Relationship Between Mode and Substance in Spinoza's Metaphysics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33: 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, A. 1991. “The Materiality of Morals.” Studia Spinozana 7: 69–92.Google Scholar

Cover, J. A., and Kulstad, Mark, eds. 1990. Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin. 1969. Spinoza's Metaphysics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1972. “Roots of Contingency.” In Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Frankfurt, Harry, 69–97. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1973. “Experience in Spinoza's Theory of Knowledge.” In Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Grene, Marjorie, 354–76. Garden City: Doubleday/Anchor.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1975. “Descartes, Spinoza and the Ethics of Belief.” In Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation, ed. Mandelbaum, Maurice and Freeman, Eugene, 159–89. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1988. Behind the Geometrical Method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1990a. “Notes on a Neglected Masterpiece (II): The Theological-Political Treatise as a Prolegomenon to the Ethics.” In Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Cover, J. A. and Kulstad, Mark, 109–60. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1990b. “On Bennett's Spinoza: The Issue of Teleology.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, ed. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François, 39–52. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1991. “On Bennett's Interpretation of Spinoza's Monism.” In God and Nature in Spinoza's Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu, Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences, 35–51. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin.1996. “Kissinger, Spinoza and Genghis Khan.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, ed. Garrett, Don, 315–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin, and Moreau, Pierre-François, eds. 1990. Spinoza: Issues and Directions. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin, and Gregory M. Walski. 1999. “Spinoza's Necessitarianism Reconsidered.” In New Essays on the Rationalists, ed. Gennaro, Rocco and Huenemann, Charles, 241–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

D'Allonnes, M. R., and Rizk, H., eds. 1994. Spinoza: puissance et ontologie. Paris: Editions Kime.Google Scholar

Court, Johan. 1662. Consideratien van Staat, 4th edn. Amsterdam: n.p.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1981. Spinoza: Philosophie pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 1996. Representation and the Mind–Body Problem in Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael.2002. “Spinoza's Substance Monism.” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, ed. Koistinen, Olli and Biro, John, 11–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael.2003a. “The Power of an Idea: Spinoza's Critique of Pure Will.” Nous 37: 200–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael.2003b. “A Rationalist Manifesto: Spinoza and the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Philosophical Topics 31: 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael.Forthcoming in Mind. “Spinoza and the Metaphysics of Skepticism.”

Uyl, Douglas. 1983. Power, State and Freedom: An Interpretation of Spinoza. Assen: van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Descartes, René. 1974. Oeuvres de Descartes. 11 vols., ed. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. Paris: J. Vrin, 1964–74.Google Scholar

Donagan, Alan. 1988. Spinoza, New York: Harvester.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry, ed. 1972. Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry,1999. Necessity, Volition and Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Funkenstein, Amos. 1986. Theology and the Scientific Imagination. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel. 2004. “Dr. Fischelson's Dilemma: Spinoza on Freedom and Sociability.” In Ethica IV: Spinoza on Reason and the “Free Man,” ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu and Segal, Gideon, Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences, 183–207. New York: Little Room Press.Google Scholar

Garret, Don. 1991. “Spinoza's Necessitarianism.” In God and Nature in Spinoza's Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu, Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences, 191–218. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Garret, Don.1994. “ ‘A Free Man Always Acts Honestly, Not Deceptively’: Freedom and the Good in Spinoza's Ethics.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, ed. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François, 221–38. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Garret, Don.ed. 1996a. The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garret, Don.1996b. “Spinoza's Ethical Theory.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, ed. Garrett, Don, 267–314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garret, Don.1999. “Teleology in Spinoza and Early Modern Rationalism.” In New Essays on the Rationalists, ed. Gennaro, Rocco and Huenemann, Charles, 310–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Garret, Don.2001. “Spinoza's Conatus Argument,” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, ed. Koistinen, Olli and Biro, John, 127–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gatens, M. and Lloyd, G. 1999. Collective Imaginings: Spinoza, Past and Present, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gatens, M. and Lloyd, G.Unpublished. “Imagination, Religion and Morality: the Vicissitudes of Power in the Tractatus Theologico Politicus.”

Gennaro, Rocca, and Huenemann, Charles, eds. 1999. New Essays on the Rationalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grene, M., ed. 1973. Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, Garden City: Anchor/Doubleday.Google Scholar

Gueroult, M. 1968. Spinoza. 2 vols. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar

Hampshire, Stuart. 2005. Spinoza and Spinozism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1995. Lectures on the History of Philosophy. 3 vols., trans. E. S. Haldane and F. H. Simson. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, ed. Gaskin, J. C. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas.1994. Leviathan, the 1668 Latin edition, ed. and trans. Curley, Edwin. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas.1996. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas.1998. On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas.1999. Human Nature and De Corpore Politico, ed. Gaskin, J. C. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Kinch. 2006. “A Lion in the House: Hobbes and Democracy.” In Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, ed. Brett, Annabel, Tully, James and Hamilton-Bleakley, Holly, 191–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huenemann, Charlie. 2004. “Spinoza and Prime Matter.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42: 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, David. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd edn., ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Israel, Jonathan. 2006. Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joachim, H. H. 1940. A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Critique of Pure Reason, ed. Guyer, Paul and trans. Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kashap, Paul, ed. 1978. Studies in Spinoza: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kennington, Richard, ed. 1980. The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Koistinen, Olli, and Biro, John, eds. 2002. Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laerke, Mogens. [In press]. Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza. Paris: Honoré Champion.

Laux, Henri. 1993. Imagination et religion chez Spinoza. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1875–90. Die philosophischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz. 7 vols., ed. Gerhardt, C. I.. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1923–. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. ed. German Academy of Sciences. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1948. Textes inédits d'après les manuscrits de la Bibliothèque provinciale de Hanovre. 2 vols., ed. Grua, Gaston. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1952. Theodicy, trans. and ed. Huggard, E. M.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1967. The Leibniz–Arnauld Correspondence, trans. and ed. Mason, H. T.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1969. Philosophical Papers and Letters, trans. and ed. Loemker, Leroy E.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1982–. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Vorausedition zur Reihe VI (Philosophischen Schriften). ed. Leibniz-Forschungsstelle of the Universität Münster. Münster.

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm.1989. Philosophical Essays, trans. and ed. Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Levine, Michael P. 1994. Pantheism: A Non-Theistic Concept of Deity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Loeb, Louis. 1981. From Descartes to Hume. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Macherey, Pierre. 1979. Hegel ou Spinoza. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar

Macherey, Pierre.1994. Introduction à l'Ethique de Spinoza: La Cinquième Partie, les voies de la libération. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, Maurice, and Freeman, Eugene, eds. 1975. Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre. 1969. Individu et Communauté chez Spinoza. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre.1971. Le Christ et le salut des ignorants chez Spinoza. Paris: Aubier Montaigne.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre.1994. “L'Indignation et le conatus de l'état spinoziste.” In Spinoza: puissance et ontologie, ed. D'Allonnes, M. R. and Rizk, H.. Paris: Editions Kime.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre.1997. “Spinoza and Hobbes.” In The New Spinoza, ed. Montag, Warren and Stolze, Ted, 207–16. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Montag, Warren. 1999. Bodies, Masses, Power. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Montag, Warren, and Stolze, Ted, eds. 1997. The New Spinoza. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Moreau, P.-F. 1994. Spinoza: l'expérience et l'éternité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2002. Spinoza's Heresy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio. 1997. “Reliqua Desiderantur: A Conjecture for a Definition of a Concept of Democracy in the Final Spinoza.” In The New Spinoza, ed. Montag, Warren and Stolze, Ted, 219–47. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio, and Hardt, Michael. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Newlands, Samuel. Unpublished. “The Harmony of Spinoza and Leibniz”.

Nietzsche, F. W. 1973. Beyond Good and Evil, trans. and ed. Hollingdale, R. J.. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Owen, H. P. 1971. Concepts of Deity. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preus, J. Samuel. 2001. Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radner, Daisie. 1971. “Spinoza's Theory of Ideas.” The Philosophical Review 80: 338–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 1998. Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sleigh, Robert. 1990. Leibniz and Arnauld: A Commentary on their Correspondence. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sleigh, Robert.1996. “Leibniz's First Theodicy.” Nous 30 (supplement): 481–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sleigh, Robert.1999. “Leibniz on Freedom and Necessity: Critical Notice of Robert Adams, Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist.” Philosophical Review 108: 245–77.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven 1997. Spinoza, Liberalism, and the Question of Jewish Identity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus de. 1925. Spinoza Opera. 4 vols. (vol. 5, 1987), ed. Gebhardt, Carl. Hildesheim: Carl Winter.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus de.1985. The Collected Works of Spinoza. Vol. I, ed. and trans. Curley, Edwin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus.1995. The Letters, trans. Samuel Shirley, introduction and notes by Steven Barbone, Lee Rice and Jacob Adler. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus de.1999. Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Vol. III of the Spinoza Oeuvres, ed. Akkerman, F., Lagrée, J. and Moreau, P.-F.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus.2000. Political Treatise, trans. Samuel Shirley, introduction and notes by Steven Barbone and Lee Rice, with prefatory essay by Douglas Den Uyl. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus de.2002. Spinoza: Complete Works, ed. Morgan, Michael and trans. Shirley, Samuel. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Tosel, André. 1990. “Y-a-t-il une philosophie du progrès historique chez Spinoza?” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, ed. Moreau, P.-F. and Curley, E., 306–26. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. 2006. “Hobbes and democracy.” In Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, ed. Brett, Annabel, Tully, James and Hamilton-Bleakley, Holly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verbeek, Theo. 2003. Spinoza's Theologico-Political Treatise: Exploring the “Will of God.”London: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

Wansink, H. 1981. Politieke wetenschappen aan de Leidse universiteit, 1575–1650. Utrecht: n.p.Google Scholar

Wilson, Margaret. 1980. “Objects, Ideas, and ‘Minds.'” In The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza, ed. Kennington, Richard, 103–20. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Wolfson, H. A. 1934. The Philosophy of Spinoza. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Yovel, Yirmiyahu. 1985. “Spinoza: The Psychology of the Multitude and the Uses of Language.” Studia Spinozana 1: 305–33.Google Scholar

Yovel, Yirmiyahu.1989. Spinoza and Other Heretics, vol. I: The Marrano of Reason, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Yovel, Yirmiyahu.ed. 1994. Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind: Papers Presented at the Second Jerusalem Conference (Ethica II). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Yovel, Yirmiyahu, and Segal, Gideon, eds. 2004. Ethica IV: Spinoza on Reason and the “Free Man.” Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences. New York: Little Room Press.Google Scholar

Zac, Sylvain. 1991. “On the Idea of Creation in Spinoza.” In God and Nature in Spinoza's Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu, Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences, 231–41. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar