Aarts, Bas 2007. Syntactic gradience. The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers. A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2007. Typological distinctions in word formation. In Shopen (ed.), volume III, 1–63.

Ambridge, Ben and Lieven, Elena V. M. 2011. Child language acquisition. Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, Elaine 1978. Lexical universals of body-part terminology. In Greenberg et al. (eds.), volume III, 335–368.

Archibald, John 1998. Second language phonology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, and Sandler, Wendy 2005. The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81/2: 301–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashby, Michael and Maidment, John. 2005. Introducing phonetic science. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan, and Corbett, Greville G. 2005. The syntax-morphology interface. A study of syncretism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bakker, Dik 2011. Language sampling. In Song (ed.) 100–127.

Barlow, Michael and Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.) 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

Bates, Elizabeth, Devescovi, Antonella, and Wulfeck, Beverly 2001. Psycholinguistics: a cross-linguistic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52: 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behaghel, Otto 1932. Deutsche Syntax. Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, volume IV. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar

Bell, Alan 1978. Syllabic consonants. In Greenberg et al. (eds.), volume II, 153–201.

Berlin, Brent and Kay, Paul 1969, 1991. Basic color terms. Their universality and evolution. The University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bhat, D. N. S. 2004. Pronouns. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar 2011. Grammatical relations typology. In Song (ed.) 399–445.

Bickel, Balthasar and Nichols, Johanna 2005. Fusion of selected inflectional formatives. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 86–89.

Bickel, Balthasar and Nichols, Johanna 2007. Inflectional morphology. In Shopen (ed.), volume III: 169–240.

Bisang, Walter 2011. Word classes. In Song (ed.) 280–302.

Blevins, Juliette 1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In Goldsmith (ed.) 206–244.

Blevins, Juliette 2004. Evolutionary phonology. The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian, Mugdan, Joachim, and Skopetea, Stavros (eds.) 2000. Morphology. An international handbook on inflection and word formation, volume II. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, Lera 2009. How does our language shape the way we think? In Brockman, Max (ed.) What’s next? Dispatches on the future of science. Vintage Press.Google Scholar

Bowerman, Melissa 1996. The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In Gumperz, John J. and Levinson, Stephen C. (eds.) Rethinking linguistic relativity, 145–176. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bowerman, Melissa and Choi, Soonja 2001. Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language- specific in the acquisition of semantic categories. In Melissa, Bowerman, and Levinson, Stephen C. (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development, 475–511. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breen, Gavan and Pensalfini, Bob 1999. Arrente: a language with no syllable onsets. Linguistic Inquiry 30/1: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brentari, Diane 1995. Sign language phonology: ASL. In Goldsmith (ed.) 615–639.

Brown, Cecil H. 1976. General principles of human anatomical partonomy and speculations on the growth of partonomic nomenclature. American Ethnologist 3/3: 400–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Cecil H. 2005a. Hand and arm. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 522–525.

Brown, Cecil H. 2005b. Finger and hand. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 526–529.

Brown, Cecil H. and Witkowski, Stanley R. 1981. Figurative language in a universalist perspective. American Ethnologist 8/3: 596–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Dunstan. 2011. Morphological typology. In Song (ed.) 487–503.

Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.) Style in language, 253–276. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Burenhult, Niclas 2006. Body part terms in Jahai. Language Sciences 28/203: 162–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butskhrikidze, Marika 2010. The nature of consonant sequences in Georgian. In Wohlgemuth et al. (eds.), 2010a, 23–46.

Butterworth, Brian, Comrie, Bernard and Dahl, Östen (eds.) 1984. Explanations for language universals. New York: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan 1985. Morphology. A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan 1988. The diachronic dimension in explanation. In Hawkins (ed.) 350–379.

Bybee, Joan 2010. Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bynon, Theodora 1977. Historical linguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, Charles E. and Raimy, Eric 2011. Handbook of the syllable. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Chadwick, John 1970. The decipherment of Linear B. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chapin, Paul G. 1978. Easter Island: a characteristic VSO language. In Lehmann, Winfred P. (ed.) Syntactic typology. Studies in the phenomenology of language. 139–168. The University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Chappell, Hilary and McGregor, William (eds.) 1996. The grammar of inalienability. A typological perspective on body part terms and the part-whole relation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 2002. On nature and language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 2007. Approaching UG from below. In Uli, Sauerland and Hans-Martin, Gärtner (eds.) Interfaces + Recursion = Language, 1–19. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo and Kayne, Richard S. 2005. The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Eve V. 1971. On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10/3: 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Eve V. 2003. First language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Claudi, Ulrike 1994. Word order change as category change. In Pagliuca (ed.) 193–231.

Comrie, Bernard 1980. The order of case and possessive suffixes in Uralic languages: an approach to the comparative-historical problem. Lingua Posnaniensis 23: 81–86.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1986. Markedness, grammar, people, and the world. In Eckman, Fred R., Moravcsik, Edith A., and Wirth, Jessica R. (eds.) Markedness, 85–106. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. Second edition. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard (ed.) 1990. The major languages of the world. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 2005a. Alignment of case markers. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 398–405.

Comrie, Bernard 2005b. Writing systems. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 568–571.

Comrie, Bernard and Kuteva, Tania 2005. Relativization strategies. In Haspelmath et al. (ed.) 494–501.

Comrie, Bernard, Matthews, Stephen, and Polinsky, Maria (eds.) 2003. The atlas of languages. The origin and development of languages throughout the world. Second edition. New York: Facts on File, Inc.Google Scholar

Cooke, Joseph R. 1968. Pronominal reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2011. Implicational hierarchies. In Song (ed.), 190–205.

Craig, Colette G. 1986. Jacaltec noun classifiers: a study in language and culture. In Craig (ed.) 363–393.

Craig, Colette G. (ed.) 1986. Noun classes and categorization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William 2000. Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Croft, William 2001. Radical construction grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William 2002. On being a student of Joe Greenberg. Linguistic Typology 6/1: 3–8.Google Scholar

Croft, William 2003. Typology and universals. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael 2003. The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dalmi, Grete 2010. Copular sentences, predication, and cyclic agree: a comparative approach. Saarbrücken.Google Scholar

Daniel, Michael 2005. Plurality in independent personal pronouns. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 146–149.

Daniels, Peter T. and Bright, William (eds.) 1996. The world’s writing systems. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, Garry W. and Iverson, Gregory K. (eds.) 1992. Explanation in historical linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dell, François and Elmedlaoui, Mohamed. 2002. Syllables in Tashlhiyt Berber and in Moroccan Arabic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutscher, Guy 2005. The unfolding of language. An evolutionary tour of mankind’s greatest invention. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar

Deutscher, Guy 2010. Through the language glass. Why the world looks different in other languages. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger 1999. Demonstratives. Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diessel, Holger 2012. Diachronic change and language acquisition. In Alexander, Bergs and Laurel, Brinton (eds.) Historical linguistics of English: an international handbook, volume II. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria and Williams, Edwin 1987. On the definition of word. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1988. A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory. Volume I:Methodology, volume II: Grammatical topics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.) 2002. Word. A cross-linguistic typology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Margaret and Wales, Roger 1970. On the acquisition of some relational terms. In Hayes, John R. (ed.) Cognition and the development of language, 235–268. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Downing, Pamela 1996. Numeral classifier systems. The case of Japanese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1995. Interactions between iconicity and other semiotic parameters in language. In Simone (ed.) 21–37.

Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2003. Naturalness and morphological change. In Joseph and Janda (eds.) 461–471.

Dryer, Matthew S. 1989. Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language 13/2: 257–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68/1: 81–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005a. Order of subject, object, and verb. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 330–333.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005b. Order of adposition and noun phrase. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 346–349.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005c. Order of genitive and noun. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 350–353.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005d. Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of adposition and noun phrase. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 386–389.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005e. Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of relative clause and noun. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 390–393.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005f. Position of case affixes. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 210–213.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005g. Definite articles. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 154–157.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005h. Indefinite articles. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 158–161.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005i. Prefixing versus suffixing in inflectional morphology. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 110–113.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Word order. In Shopen (ed.), volume I, 61–131.

Du Bois, John W. 1985. Competing motivations. In Haiman (ed.) 343–365.

Eagleman, David 2011. Incognito. The secret lives of the brain. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Eckman, Fred 1977. Markedness and the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. Language Learning 27: 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckman, Fred 1991. The Structural Conformity Hypothesis and the acquisition of consonant clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13/1: 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckman, Fred 2011. Linguistic typology and second language acquisition. In Song (ed.) 618–633.

Eckman, Fred, Moravcsik, Edith, and Wirth, Jessica R. 1989. Implicational universals and interrogative structures in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Language Learning 39: 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emmorey, Karen 2002. Language, cognition, and the brain. Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. (ed.) 2002. Ethnosyntax. Explorations in grammar and culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard 1994. The development of the definite article in French. In Pagliuca (ed.) 63–78.

Evans, Nicholas 1998. Aborigines speak a primitive language. In Laurie, Bauer and Peter, Trudgill (eds.) Language myths, 159–168. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas 2000. Word classes in the world’s languages. In Booij et al. (eds.) 708–731.

Evans, Nicholas 2010. Dying words. Endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas 2011. Semantic typology. In Song (ed.) 505–533.

Evans, Nicholas and Levinson, Stephen C. 2009. The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Evans, Nicholas and Osada, Toshiki 2005. Mundari: the myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology 9/3: 351–390.Google Scholar

Everett, Daniel 2008. Don’t sleep, there are snakes. Life and language in the Amazonian jungle. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Everett, Daniel 2012. Language: the cultural tool. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. 1975. Universal tendencies and ‘normal’ nasality. In Ferguson et al. (ed.) 175–196.

Ferguson, Charles A., Hyman, Larry M., and Ohala, John J. (eds.) 1975. Nasálfest. Stanford University.Google Scholar

Filipovi´c, Luna 2007. Talking about motion. A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, Barbara A. and Jasperson, Robert 1995. A syntactic exploration of repair in English conversation. In Davis, P. W. (ed.) Alternative linguistics. Descriptive and theoretical modes, 77–134. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara A., Hayashi, Makoto, and Jasperson, Robert 1996. Resources and repair: a crosslinguistic study of syntax and repair. In Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.) Interaction and grammar, 285–237. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara A., Maschler, Yael, and Uhmann, Susanne 2009. Morpho-syntactic resources for the organization of same-turn self-repair: cross-linguistic variation in English, German, and Hebrew. Gesprächsforschung. Online Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10: 245–291. Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara A. et al. 2012. A crosslinguistic investigation of the site of initiation in same-turn self-repair. In Sidnell, Jack (ed.) Conversation analysis: comparative perspectives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Frauenfelder, Ulli, Segui, Juan, and Mehler, Jacques 1980. Monitoring around the relative clause. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19/3: 328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelderen, Elly 2011. The linguistic cycle. Language change and the language faculty. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gell-Mann, Murray and Ruhlen, Merritt 2011. The origin and evolution of word order. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108/42: 17290–17295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gentner, Dedre and Goldin-Meadow, Susan (eds.) 2003. Language in mind. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Giacalone Ramat, Anna (ed.) 2003. Typology and second language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Gil, David 2005. Numeral classifiers. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 226–229.

Givón, Talmy 1981. The development of the numeral ‘one’ as an indefinite marker. Folia Linguistica Historica 2: 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givón, Talmy 2002. Bio-linguistics. The Santa Barbara lectures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givón, Talmy 2009. The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleason, H. A. 1955. An introduction to descriptive linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. 2009. The writing revolution. Cuneiform to the Internet. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff and Wierzbicka, Anna (eds.) 1994. Introducing lexical primitives. In Goddard, Cliff and Wiezbicka, Anna (eds.) Semantic and lexical universals. Theory and empirical findings, 31–54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goddard, Cliff and Wierzbicka, Anna (eds.) 2002. Meaning and universal grammar. Theory and empirical findings. Volumes I–II. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Goedemans, Rob and van der Hulst, Harry. 2005. Rhythm types. In Haspelmath et al. (ed.) 74–77.

Goldsmith, John A. (ed.) 1995. The handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gould, Stephen Jay 2011. The hedgehog, the fox, and the magister’s pox. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966a. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg (ed.) 1966b, 73–113.

Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.) 1966b. Universals of language. Second edition. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966c [2005, new edition]. Language universals. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1977. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. In Adam, Makkai, Becker Makkai, Valerie, and Hellmann, Luigi (eds.) Linguistics at the crossroads. 276–300. Lake Bluff, IL: Jupiter Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978a. Generalizations about numeral systems. In Greenberg et al. (eds.), volume III, 249–295.

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978b. Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In Greenberg et al. (eds.), volume II, 243–279.

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978c. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Greenberg et al. (eds.), volume III, 47–82.

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1980. Universals of kinship terminology: their nature and the problem of their explanation. In Jacques Maquet (ed.) On linguistic anthropology: essays in honor of Harry Hoijer, 9–32. Malibu: Udena.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles A. and Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds.) 1978. Universals of human language. Volumes I–IV. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Gregory, Bruce 1988. Inventing reality. Physics as language. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos and Jacobs, Haike 1998. Understanding phonology. Second edition. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar

Haddon, Mark 2001. The curious incident of the dog at night-time. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Haiman, John 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In Pagliuca (ed.) 3–28.

Haiman, John (ed.) 1985. Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haiman, John 2003. Explaining infixation. In Moore and Polinsky (eds.) 105–120.

Hall, Christopher J. 1988. Integrating diachronic and processing principles in explaining the suffixing preference. In Hawkins (ed.) 321–349.

Hall, Rich and friends 1984. Sniglets (snig’let): any word that does not appear in the dictionary but it should. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris and Clements, G. N. 1983. Problem book in phonology. A workbook in introductory courses in linguistics and in modern phonology. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald 2010. Rarities in numeral systems. In Wohlgemuth and Cysouw (eds.) 2010b, 11–59.

Hanke, Thomas 2010. Additional rarities in the typology of numerals. In Wohlgemuth and Cysouw (eds.) 2010b, 61–89.

Hardin, C. L. and Maffi, Luisa (eds.) 1997. Color categories in thought and language. Cambridge University Press. (Review in Linguistic Typology, 1999, 3/2: 259–269.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, Alice C. 2010. Explaining typologically unusual structures: the role of probability. In Wohlgemuth and Cysouw (eds.) 2010b, 91–103.

Harris, Alice C. and Campbell, Lyle 1995. Historical syntax in crosslinguistic perspective. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42/1: 25–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86/3: 663–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David, and Comrie, Bernard (eds.) 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf, and Raible, Wolfgang (eds.) 2001. Language typology and language universals. An international handbook. Volumes I–II. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin and Sims, Andrea D. 2010. Understanding morphology. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar

Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam, and Fitch, W. Tecumseh 2002. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298/5598: 1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haviland, John B. 1979. How to talk to your brother-in-law in Guugu Yimidhirr. In Shopen (ed.) 1979a, 161–239.Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1988. Explaining language universals. In Hawkins (ed.) 3–28.

Hawkins, John A. (ed.) 1988. Explaining language universals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1999. Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language 75/2: 244–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, John A. and Gilligan, Gary 1988. Prefixing and suffixing universals in relation to basic word order. Lingua 74: 219–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania 2006. The changing languages of Europe. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees 1992. Non-verbal predication. Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Virginia M. and O’Regan, J. K. 1981. Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative clause sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20/4: 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2003. Grammaticalization. Second edition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hulst, Harry and Weijer, Jeroen. 1995. Vowel harmony. In Goldsmith (ed.) 495–534.

Hulst, Harry and Ritter, Nancy A. (eds.) 1999. The syllable: views and facts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurford, James R. 1975. The linguistic theory of numerals. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hurford, James R. 1987. Language and number. The emergence of a cognitive system. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hurford, James R., Studdert-Kennedy, Michael, and Knight, Chris (eds.) 1998. Approaches to the evolution of language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, Kenneth 1984. The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition: the case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. In Roger, Anderson (ed.) Second languages. A crosslinguistic perspective, 39–57. Rowley, MA: Newbury.Google Scholar

Inoue, Kyoko 1979. Japanese: a story of language and people. In Shopen (ed.) 1979a, 241–300.Google Scholar

Iturrioz Leza, José Luis 2001. Inkorporation. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.), volume I, 714–725.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2012. A user’s guide to thought and meaning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jonsson, Niklas 2001. Kin terms in grammar. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.), volume II, 1203–1214.

Joseph, Brian 2002. ‘Word’ in Modern Greek. In Dixon and Aikhenvald (eds.) 243–265.

Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D. (eds.) 2003. The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaku, Michio. 2008. Physics of the impossible. A scientific exploration into the world of phasers, force fields, teleportation, and time travel. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Kay, Paul, Berlin, Brent, Maffi, Luisa, Merrifield, William R., and Cook, Richard 2009. World color survey. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward and Comrie, Bernard 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8/1: 63–99.Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward L. and Hawkins, Sarah 1987. The psychological validity of the Accessibility Hierarchy. In Keenan, Edward L., Universal grammar. 15 essays, 60–85. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Keller, Rudi 1994. On language change. The invisible hand in language. Translated by Brigitte Nerlich. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kertész, András and Rákosi, Csilla 2012. Data and evidence in linguistics. A plausible argumentation model. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kimenyi, Alexandre 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kinsella, Anna R. 2009. Language evolution and syntactic theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirby, Simon 1999. Function, selection, and innateness. The emergence of language universals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Klatzky, Roberta L., Clark, Eve V., and Macken, Marlys 1973. Asymmetries in the acquisition of polar adjectives: linguistic or conceptual? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 16/1: 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klima, Edward S. and Bellugi, Ursula 1979. The signs of language. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (2008). Approaching lexical typology. In Vanhove, Martine (ed.) From polysemy to semantic change: towards a typology of semantic associations, 3–52. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krámsk´y, Jiˇri 1972. The article and the concept of definiteness in language. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter and Maddieson, Ian 1996. The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lado, Robert 1957. Linguistics across cultures: applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Lahiri, Aditi 2001. Metrical patterns. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.), volume II, 1347–1367.

Lakoff, George 1986. Classifiers as a reflection of mind. In Craig (ed.) 13–51.

Langacker, Ronald W. 1972. Fundamentals of linguistic analysis. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lashley, K. S. 1951. The problem of serial order in behavior. In Jeffress, Lloyd A. (ed.) Cerebral mechanisms in behavior, 112–136. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Leeding, Velma J. 1996. Body parts and possession in Anindilyakwa. In Chappell and McGregor (eds.) 193–250.

Lehmann, Christian 1982. Universal and typological aspects of agreement. In Seiler, Hansjakob and Stachowiak, Franz Josef (eds.) Apprehension. Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen. Teil II. Die Techniken und ihr Zusamenhang in Einzelsprachen, 201–267. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich – Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Lehrer, Adrienne 1974. Semantic fields and lexical structure. Amsterdam: American Elsevier.Google Scholar

Levelt, Clara C. 2011. Consonant harmony in child language. In van Oestendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, and Rice, Keren (ed.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lewis, Geoffrey L. 1967. Turkish grammar. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1974. An explanation of word order change SVO → SOV. Foundations of Language 12/2: 201–14.Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1975. Historical change in word order: a case study in Chinese and its implications. In Anderson, John M. and Jones, C. (eds.) Historical linguistics. Proceedings of the first international conference on historical linguistics, volume I: Syntax, morphology, internal and comparative reconstruction, 199–217. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese. A functional reference grammar. The University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lindblom, Björn, MacNeilage, Michael, and Studdert-Kennedy, Michael 1984. Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals. In Butterworth et al. (eds.) 181–203.

Lucy, John A. 1997. The linguistics of “color.” In , Hardin and , Maffi (eds.) 320–345.

Luraghi, Silvia, Thornton, Anna and Voghera, Miriam 2003. Esercizi di linguistica. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar

MacLaury, Robert 2001. Color terms. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.), volume II, 1227–1251.

MacWhinney, Brian 1999. The emergence of language from embodiment. In MacWhinney, Brian (ed.) The emergence of language, 213–256. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian and Bates, Elizabeth 1989. The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian, Malchukov, Andrej, and Moravcsik, Edith (eds.). To appear. Competing motivations in grammar, acquisition, and usage. Oxford University Press.

Maddieson, Ian 2005a. Consonant inventories. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 10–13.

Maddieson, Ian 2005b. Consonant-vowel ratio. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 18–21.

Maddieson, Ian 2005c. Voicing in plosives and fricatives. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 22–25.

Maddieson, Ian 2005d. Front rounded vowels. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 50–53.

Maddieson, Ian 2005e. Syllable structure. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 54–57.

Maddieson, Ian 2005f. Tone. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 58–61.

Maddieson, Ian 2005g. Presence of uncommon consonants. In Haspelmath el al. (ed.) 82–85.

Maddieson, Ian 2011. Typology of phonological systems. In Song (ed.) 534–548.

Major, Roy Coleman. 2001. Foreign accent. The ontology and phylogeny of second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej and Spencer, Andrew (eds.) 2009. The Oxford handbook of case. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej 2011. Interaction of verbal categories: resolution of infelicitous grammeme combinations. Linguistics 49/1: 229–282.Google Scholar

Mattes, Veronika 2006. One form – opposite meanings? Diminutive and augmentative interpretation of full reduplication in Bikol.

Matthews, S. and Yip, V. 2003. Relative clauses in early bilingual development: transfer and universals. In Giacalone Ramat (ed.), 39–81.

Merrifield, Willam R. et al. 1987. Laboratory manual for morphology and syntax. Revised edition. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60: 847–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mithun, Marianne 1999. The languages of Native North America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moore, John and Polinsky, Maria 2003. Explanations in linguistics. In Moore and Polinsky (eds.) 1–30.

Moore, John and Polinsky, Maria (eds.) 2003. The nature of explanation in linguistic theory. Stanford, CA: The Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In Greenberg et al. (eds.), volume III, 297–334.

Moravcsik, Edith 2006a. An introduction to syntax. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith 2006b. An introduction to syntactic theory. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith 2007. What is universal about typology? Linguistic Typology 11/1, 27–41.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith 2009. Partonomic structures in syntax. In Evans, Vyvyan and Pourcel, Stéphanie (eds.) New directions in cognitive linguistics, 269–285. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith 2010. Explaining language universals. In Song (ed.) 69–89.

Nathan, Geoffrey S. 2008. Phonology. A cognitive grammar introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nedjalkov, Vladimir K. (ed.) Reciprocal constructions. Volume III. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Nettle, Daniel. 1998. Functionalism and its difficulties in biology and linguistics. In Darnell, Michael et al. (eds.) Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, volume I, 445–467. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew 2010. Locality in vowel harmony. The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newman, John (ed.) 1998. The linguistics of giving. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newman, John (ed.) 2002. The linguistics of sitting, standing, and lying. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newman, John (ed.) 2009. The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newman, Paul 2000. The Hausa language. An encyclopedic reference grammar. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language form and language function. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2003. Theoretical implications of grammatical category – grammatical relations mismatched. In Francis, Elaine J. and Michaelis, Laura A. (eds.) Mismatch: form-function incongruity and the architecture of grammar, 149–178. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2005. Probable and possible languages. A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford University Press. (Review in Linguistic Typology, 2006, 10/2, 277–286.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2010. On comparative concepts and descriptive categories. Language 86:3, 688–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nida, Eugene (ed.) 1972. The book of a thousand tongues. Revised edition. United Bible Societies.Google Scholar

Niemeier, Susanne and René, Dirven (eds.) (2000). Evidence for linguistic relativity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odden, David 2005. Introducing phonology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogloblin, Alexandr K. and Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 2007. Reciprocal constructions in Indonesian. In Nedjalkov (ed.) 1437–1476.

Ohala, John 1975. Phonetic explanations for nasal sound patterns. In Ferguson et al. (eds.) 289–316.

Ohala, Manjari 1975. Nasals and nasalization in Hindi. In Ferguson et al. (eds.) 317–332.

Pagliuca, William (ed.) 1994. Perspectives on grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa 1995. Resumptives in the acquisition of relative clauses. Language Acquisition 4: 105–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, Ann M. 1983. The units of language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, Martin C. To appear. Formal and functional motivations for the structure of self-repair in German. In MacWhinney et al. (eds).

Pereltsvaig, Asya 2012. Languages of the world. An introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, Steven and Jackendoff, Ray 2009. The reality of the universal language faculty. Behavior and Brain Sciences 32: 465–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plank, Frans 1984. 24 grundsätzliche Bemerkungen zur Wortarten-Frage. Leuvense Bijdragen 73: 489–520.Google Scholar

Plank, Frans 1999. Split morphology: how agglutination and flexion mix. Linguistic Typology 3/3: 279–340.Google Scholar

Plank, Frans and Schellinger, Wolfgang 1997. The uneven distribution of genders over numbers. Greenberg Nos. 37 and 45. Linguistic Typology 1/1: 53–101.Google Scholar

Ramat, Paolo 1987. Linguistic typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Randall, Lisa 2011. How science can lead the way. TIME Magazine, October 3, 2011, 20.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan 2002. The noun phrase. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roca, Iggy and Johnson, Wyn 1999. A workbook in phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rogers, Henry 2005. Writing systems. A linguistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rubba, Johanna 2001. Introflection. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 678–694.

Sanders, Gerald A. 1977. Functional constraints on grammar. In Juilland, Alphonse (ed.) Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 161–178. Saratoga: ANMA LIBRI.Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy 1996. Representing handshapes. International Review of Sign Linguistics 1: 115–158.Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy and Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2006. Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saxe, Geoffrey B. 1981. Body parts as numerals. A developmental analysis of numeration among the Oksapmin in Papua New Guinea. Child Development, 52/1: 206–316.Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above? In Li, Charles N. (ed.) Subject and topic, 491–518. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul and Otanes, Fe T. 1972. Tagalog reference grammar. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Seiler, Hansjakob 2000. Language universals research; a synthesis. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar

Shibatani, Masayoshi and Bynon, Theodora (eds.) 1995. Approaches to language typology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Schieffelin, Bambi B. 1985. The acquisition of Kaluli. In Slobin (ed.), volume I, 525–594.

Shkarban, Lina I. and Rachkov, Gennadij E. 2007. Reciprocal, sociative, and comitative constructions in Tagalog. In Nedjalkov (ed.) 887–931.

Shopen, Timothy (ed.) 1979a. Languages and their speakers. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar

Shopen, Timothy (ed.) 1979b. Languages and their status. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar

Shopen, Timothy (ed.) 2007. Language typology and syntactic fieldwork, volumes I–III. Second edition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna 2004. Person. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siewierska, Anna 2005a. Gender distinctions in independent personal pronouns. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 182–185.

Siewierska, Anna 2005b. Alignment in verbal person marking. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 406–409.

Siewierska, Anna and Bakker, Dik 1996. The distribution of subject and object agreement and word order type. Studies in Language 20/1: 115–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, Herbert 1962. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106/6: 467–482.Google Scholar

Simone, Raffaele (ed.) 1995. Iconicity in language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slobin, Dan Isaac (ed.) 1985. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Volumes I–V. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan Isaac 1985a. Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin (ed.), volume II, 1157–1256.

Slobin, Dan Isaac 1985b. The universal, the typological, and the particular in acquisition. In Slobin (ed.), volume V, 1–39.

Slobin, Dan Isaac 2003. Language and thought online: cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Gentner and Goldin-Meadow (eds.) 157–191.

Song, Jae Jung 2001. Linguistic typology: morphology and syntax. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar

Song, Jae Jung (ed.) 2011. The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Song, Jae Jung 2012. Word order. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spencer, Andrew and Zwicky, Arnold M. (ed.) 1998. The handbook of morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stassen, Leon 2009. Predicative possession. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Supalla, Ted. 1986. The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Craig (ed.) 181–214.

Talmy, Leonard 2007. Lexical typologies. In Shopen (ed.), volume III, 66–168.

Tarallo, Fernando and Myhill, John. 1983. Interference and natural language processing in second language acquisition. Language Learning 33/1: 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2003. Linguistic categorization. Third edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Terrill, Angela. 2006. Body part terms in Lavukaleve, a Papuan language of the Solomon Island. Language Sciences 28/2–3: 304–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language contact. An introduction. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael 2003. Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1972. The history of English syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar

Underhill, Robert 1976. Turkish grammar. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo 1973. Explanation in syntax. In Kimball, John (ed.) Syntax and semantics, volume II, 1–50. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Vogel, Petra M. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.) 2000. Approaches to the typology of word classes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Völkel, Svenja. 2010. Social structure, space and possession in Tongan culture. An ethnolinguistic study. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Wanner, Eric and Maratsos, Michael. 1978. An ATN approach to comprehension. In Halle, Morris, Bresnan, Joan, and Miller, George A. (eds.) Linguistic theory and psychological reality, 119–161. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Weber, David John 1989. A grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Whaley, Lindsay J. 1997. Introduction to typology. The unity and diversity of language. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitelock, Doris 1982. White Hmong language lessons. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna 1997. Understanding cultures through their key words. English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna 2008. Why there are no ‘colour universals’ in language and thought. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14/2: 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiese, Heike 2003. Numbers, language, and the human mind. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winawer, Jonathan, Witthof, Nathan, Frank, Michael C., Wu, Lisa, Wade, Alex R., and Boroditsky, Lera 2007. Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104/19: 7780–7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wirth, Jessica R. 1983. Toward universal principles of word formation: a look at antonyms. In Shiroó, Hattori and Kazuko, Inoue (eds.) Proceedings of the XIIIth international congress of linguists, August 29– September 4 1982, Tokyo. Tokyo.Google Scholar

Witkowski, Stanley and Brown, Cecil H. 1982. Whorf and universals of color nomenclature. Journal of Anthropological Research 38/4: 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wohlgemuth, Jan and Cysouw, Michael (eds.) 2010a. Rara and rarissima. Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wohlgemuth, Jan and Cysouw, Michael (eds.) 2010b. Rethinking universals. How rarities affect linguistic theory. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike 2004a. Hand, head, and face: negative constructions in sign language. Linguistic Typology 8/1: 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike 2004b. Interrogative constructions in signed languages: crosslinguistic perspectives. Language 80/1: 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike 2005a. Sign languages. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 558–559.

Zeshan, Ulrike 2005b. Irregular negatives in sign languages. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 560–563.

Zeshan, Ulrike 2005c. Question particles in sign languages. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 564–567.