Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T17:13:15.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Professional Hostility Confronting Edwards, Steptoe, and Purdy in their Pioneering Work on In-Vitro Fertilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2018

By
Martin H. Johnson
Edited by
Gabor Kovacs ,
Peter Brinsden  and
Alan DeCherney
Gabor Kovacs
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Peter Brinsden
Affiliation:
Bourn Hall Clinic, Cambridge
Alan DeCherney
Affiliation:
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
In-Vitro Fertilization
The Pioneers' History
 , pp. 37 - 45
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexandre, H. A history of mammalian embryological research. Int J Dev Biol 2001; 45: 457–467.Google ScholarPubMed
Angell, RR, Aitken, RJ, van Look, PF, Lumsden, MA, Templeton, AA. Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos after in vitro fertilization. Nature 1983; 303(5915): 336–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anon. Culture of early human embryos is imminent. World Med 1965; 1: 19–21.Google Scholar
Anon. Controlling the sex of offspring. The Times 1968; April 26: 4.Google Scholar
Anon. Test-tube baby work likely to go on despite U.S. criticisms. Cambridge Evening News 1971a; October 18: 10.Google Scholar
Anon. Scientist warns on test-tube babies research. Cambridge Evening News 1971b; October 19: 11.Google Scholar
Anon. Deformity fears over test-tube babies. The Times 1971c; October 20: 2.Google Scholar
Anon. Men in the news: Mr Steptoe and Dr Edwards: birth is the fruit of years of study. The Times 1978; July 27: 5.Google Scholar
Betteridge, KJ. An historical look at embryo transfer. Reproduction 1981; 62: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BMJ. Northwick Park Hospital and Clinical Research Centre. Brit Med J 1969; 4(5675) October 11: 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BMJ. Northwick Park Hospital and Clinical Research Centre. Brit Med J 1970; 3(5722) September 5: 576–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brackett, BG, Seitz, HM, Mastroianni, L. In vitro fertilization: animal and human. Adv Plan Parent 1971; 7: 157–166.Google Scholar
Braude, PR. Learning from history: the clinician's view. In: Watts, G. (ed.) Hope, Hype and Hybrids: Science Policy and Media Perspectives of the Human Fertilization and Embryology Bill. London, UK: Science Media Centre, 2009, pp. 36–37.Google Scholar
Byrne, A. Births by proxy: a brave new world in motherhood is near. The Sunday Times 1965; November: 7.Google Scholar
Chang, MC. Fertilization of rabbit ova in vitro. Nature 1959; 184: 466–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, MC. In vitro fertilization of mammalian eggs. J Anim Sci 1968; 27: 15–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Clarke, AE. Disciplining Reproduction: Modernity, American Life Sciences, and ‘the Problems of Sex’. Berkeley, California: University of California Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, M. Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Dow, K. ‘The men who made the breakthrough': How the British Press represented Patrick Steptoe and Robert Edwards in 1978. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society 2017; 4: 59–67.Google Scholar
Edwards, RG. Maturation in vitro of human ovarian oocytes. Lancet 1965; 2: 926–929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, RG. Tribute to Patrick Steptoe: beginnings of laparoscopy. Human Reprod 1989; 4(Suppl.): 1–9.Google Scholar
Edwards, RG. The bumpy road to human in vitro fertilization. Nature Med 2001; 7: 1091–1094.Google Scholar
Edwards, RG. An astonishing journey into reproductive genetics since the 1950s. Reprod Nutr Devel 2005a; 45: 299–306.Google Scholar
Edwards, RG. Introduction: the Beginnings of In-Vitro Fertilization and its Derivatives. Cambridge, UK: RBMOnline Publications, 2005b, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Edwards, RG, Gardner, RL. Choosing sex before birth. New Scientist 1968; 38: 218–220.Google Scholar
Edwards, RG, Sharpe, DJ. Social values and research in human embryology. Nature 1971; 231: 87–91.Google Scholar
Edwards, RG, Steptoe, PC. A Matter of Life. London, UK: Hutchinson and Co. Ltd, 1980.Google Scholar
Edwards, RG, Steptoe, PC. Preface. In: Edwards, RG, , Purdy, JM, , Steptoe, PC (eds.) Implantation of the Human Embryo. London, UK: Academic Press, 1985, pp. vii–viii.Google Scholar
Edwards, RG, Bavister, BD, Steptoe, PC. Early stages of fertilization in vitro of human oocytes matured in vitro. Nature 1969; 221: 632–635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, RG, Steptoe, PC, Purdy, JM. Fertilization and cleavage in vitro of preovulatory human oocytes. Nature 1970; 227: 1307–1309.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, PR. The Population Bomb. New York, USA: Ballantyne Books, 1968.Google Scholar
Elder, K, Johnson, MH. The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969–1978. II. The treatment cycles and their outcomes. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society 2015a; 1: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elder, K, Johnson, MH The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969–1978. III. Variations in procedures. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society 2015b; 1: 19–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, S. Interview transcript with Martin Johnson, the history of mammalian developmental biology interviews, The British Library, C1324/14, 2008.Google Scholar
Gould, D. Private medicine. New Scientist 1981; July 2 91(1260): 40.Google Scholar
Graham, CF. Mammalian development in the UK (1950–1995). Int J Dev Biol 2000; 44: 51–55.Google Scholar
Gunning, J, English, V. Human in Vitro Fertilization. A Case Study in the Regulation of Medical Innovation. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing, 1993.Google Scholar
Hammer, RE. Egg culture: the foundation. Int J Dev Biol 1998; 42: 833–839.Google ScholarPubMed
Hansard. Unborn Children (Protection) Bill. HC Deb 15 February 1985; 73:cc637–702.Google Scholar
Henig, RM. Pandora's Baby: How the First Test-Tube Babies Sparked the Reproductive Revolution. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2004.Google Scholar
Johnson, MH. Robert Edwards: the path to IVF. Reprod BioMed Online 2011; 23: 245–262.Google Scholar
Johnson, MH, Elder, K. The OldhamNotebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969-1978. IV. Ethical aspects. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society 2015a; 1: 34–45.Google Scholar
Johnson, MH, Elder, K The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969–1978. V. The role of Jean Purdy reassessed. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society 2015b; 1: 46–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, MH, Elder, K The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969–1978. VI. Sources of support for, and expenditure on, the work. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society 2015c; 1: 58–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, MH, Franklin, SB, Cottingham, M, Hopwood, N. Why the Medical Research Council refused Robert Edwards and Patrick Steptoe support for research on human conception in 1971. Hum. Reprod. 2010; 25: 2157–2174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kass, LR, Glass, B. What price the perfect baby? Science 1971; 173: 103–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landsborough Thomson, A. Half a Century of Medical Research, Volume 2: The Programme of the Medical Research Council (UK). London, UK: Medical Research Council, 1975.Google Scholar
Leach, E. Test-tube babies. New Statesman 1966; March 4: 293–294.Google Scholar
Loughlin, K. Spectacle and secrecy: press coverage of conjoined twins in 1950s Britain. Med Hist 2005; 49: 197–212.Google Scholar
Maddox, J. Test-tube babies—the hazards and the hopes. The Times 1968; February 26: 11.Google Scholar
Marks, LV. Sexual Chemistry: A History of the Contraceptive Pill. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Mastroianni, L, Noriega, C. Observations on human ova and the fertilization process. Am J Obs Gynec 1970; 107: 682–696.Google Scholar
MRC. Responsibility in investigations on human subjects: statement by Medical Research Council. Br Med J 1964; 2(5402) July 18: 178–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MRC. The MRC Annual Report for 1983–84, 1983.Google Scholar
Mulkay, M. The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Nathoo, A. Hearts Exposed: Transplants and the Media in 1960s Britain. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
Owen, G. Sheila Mary Howarth. Brit Med J 2000; 321: 964.Google Scholar
Parkes, AS. Francis Hugh Adam Marshall. 1878–1949. Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society 1950; 7: 238–251.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, N. The Stork and the Syringe: A Political History of Reproductive Medicine. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Rothschild, . Did fertilization occur? Nature 1969; 221: 981.Google Scholar
Squier, S. Babies in Bottles: Twentieth-Century Visions of Reproductive Technology. New Jersey, USA: Rutgers University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Steptoe, PC. Laparoscopy in Gynaecology. Edinburgh, Scotland: Livingstone, 1967.Google Scholar
Steptoe, PC, Edwards, RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 1978; 2: 366.Google Scholar
Steptoe, PC, Edwards, RG, Purdy, JM. Human blastocysts grown in culture. Nature 1971; 229: 132–133.Google Scholar
Theodosiou, AA, Johnson, MH. The politics of human embryo research and the motivation to achieve PGD. Reprod BioMed Online 2011; 22: 457–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valier, H, Timmermann, C. Clinical trials and the reorganization of medical research in post-Second World War Britain. Med Hist 2008; 52: 493–510.Google Scholar
Warnock, M. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. London, UK: HMSO, 1984.Google Scholar
Whittingham, DG. Fertilization of mouse eggs in vitro. Nature 1968; 220: 592–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, P. Progress towards ‘test-tube’ baby. The Times 1970; February 24: 1.Google Scholar
Yanagimachi, R, Chang, MC. Fertilization of hamster eggs in vitro. Nature 1963; 200: 281–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×