Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:46:40.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Landscape ecology and global change

from PART IV - Landscape dynamics on multiple scales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2009

Ronald P. Neilson
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station USA
John A. Wiens
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Washington DC
Michael R. Moss
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Ontario
Get access

Summary

We often hear that the world is growing smaller. “Globalization” via rapid air travel, trade agreements, the internet, and a highly migratory global population are rapidly turning the earth into one very large landscape. Land-use change, once thought to be only a local phenomenon, is now of such a scale as to alter the composition of the atmosphere and to affect climate in far distant locations from the original perturbation. Industry across the globe, driven largely by fossil fuel combustion, has altered the composition of the atmosphere and is now clearly warming the earth's climate and producing complex responses and feedbacks between the earth's surface and its atmosphere. The global changes in the atmosphere, oceans, and land surface have forced the development of large-scale models both to understand the responses and feedbacks of change and to “predict” or forecast possible future changes, with the possibility of interventions to forestall or slow the onset of negative consequences. Since the issues of global change are by definition global, the models of atmosphere, oceans, and terrestrial biosphere are constrained to relatively coarse grids, due largely to computational limits. Unfortunately, in all three “spheres” many of the processes that determine the large-scale patterns occur at sub-grid scales. Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs), for example, are typically implemented at 0.5° latitude–longitude resolution (c. 50-km resolution). Yet most of the patterns and processes fundamental to ecosystem modeling are sub-grid scale (landscape and lower levels), rendering global simulations a challenging enterprise.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hansen, A. J. and di Castri, F. (eds.) (1992). Landscape Boundaries: Consequences for Biotic Diversity and Ecological Flows. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, R. P. (1986). High-resolution climatic analysis and southwest biogeography. Science, 232, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neilson, R. P. (1995). A model for predicting continental-scale vegetation distribution and water balance. Ecological Applications, 5, 362–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, R. P. (2003). The importance of precipitation seasonality in controlling vegetation distribution. In Changing Precipitation Regimes and Terrestrial Ecosystems: a North American Perspective, ed. Weltzin, J. F. and McPherson, G. R.. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, pp. 47–71.Google Scholar
Neilson, R. P. and Wullstein, L. H. (1983). Biogeography of two southwest American oaks in relation to atmospheric dynamics. Journal of Biogeography, 10, 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, R. P., King, G. A., DeVelice, R. L., and Lenihan, J. M. (1992). Regional and local vegetation patterns: the responses of vegetation diversity to subcontinental air masses. In Landscape Boundaries, ed. Hansen, A. J. and Castri, F. di. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, R. V., DeAngelis, D. L., Waide, J. B., and Allen, T. F. H. (1986). A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Peet, R. K. (1978). Latitudinal variation in southern Rocky Mountain forests. Journal of Biogeography, 5, 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. and Niering, W. A. (1965). Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. (II) A gradient analysis of the south slope. Ecology, 46, 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H., Gilbert, L. E., and Connell, J. H. (1979). Analysis of two-phase pattern in a Mesquite Grassland, Texas. Journal of Ecology, 67, 935–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×