Abd al-Barr, Faruq. Dawr majlis al-Dawlah al-Misri fi himayat al-huquq wa-al-hurriyat al-`amah (al-juz’ 3). al-Qahirah, Matabi` Sijill al-`Arab, 1998.Google Scholar

`Abd al-Barr, Faruq. Dawr majlis al-Dawlah al-Misri fi himayat al-huquq wa-al-hurriyat al-`amah (al-juz’ 2). al-Qahirah: Matabi` Sijill al-`Arab, 1991.Google Scholar

`Abd al-Barr, Faruq. Dawr majlis al-Dawlah al-Misri fi himayat al-huquq wa-al-hurriyat al-`ammah (al-juz’ 1). al-Qahirah: Matabi` Sijill al-`Arab, 1988.Google Scholar

`Abd al-Barr, Faruq. Mawqif `Abd al-Razzaq al-Sanhuri min qadaya al-hurriyah wa-al-dimuqratiyah. al-Qahirah: n. p., 2005.Google Scholar

Abd al-Fattāh, Nabīl, ed. al-Quḍāh wa-al-iṣlāḥ al-siyāsī. al-Qahirah: Markaz al-Qahirah li-Dirāsāt Ḥuqūq al-Insān, 2006.Google Scholar

Abd al-Hafiz, Ahmad. Niqabat al-Muhamin: surat Misr fi al-qarn al-`ishrin. al-Qahirah Markaz al-Dirasat al-Siyasiyah wa-al-Istiratijiyah, 2003.Google Scholar

Abd al-Hamīd, Husni Darwish. al-Qadā’ hisn al-hurriyat. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Ma‘ārif, 1986.Google Scholar

Abd Allah, Abd al-Ghani Basyuni. Mabda al-musawah amama al-qada wa-kafalat haqq al-taqadi. al-Iskandariyah: Munshaat al-Ma`arif, 1983.Google Scholar

Abd al-Mun`im, Ahmad Faris. al-Dawr al-siyasi li-Niqabat al-Muhamin, (1912–1981). al-Qahirah: n.p., 1984.Google Scholar

Abd al-Rāziq, Husayn. Misr fī 18 wa-19 Yanāyir: dirāsah siyāsīyah wathā‘iqiyah. al-Qahirah: Shuhdī, 1985.Google Scholar

Abd al-Salsm, Muhammad. Sanawat ‘asibah: dhikriyat Na’ib ‘amm. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Shuruq, 1975.Google Scholar

Abdel-Fadil, Mahmoud. Iqtisād al-Misrī bayna al-takhtīt al-markazī wa-al- infitāh al-iqtisādī. Tarābulus: Ma’had al-Inmā‘ al-’Arabī, 1980.Google Scholar

Asfur, Muhammad. Istiqlal al-sultah al-qada’iyah. al-Qahirah: Matba`at Atlas, 1969.Google Scholar

Asfur, Sa‘d, and Khalīl, Muḥsin. al-qada al-Idari. al-Iskandariyah: Munsha‘at al-Ma‘arif, 1975.Google Scholar

Ashmawi, Muhammad Sa`id. `Alá minassat al-qada. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Hilal, 2000.Google Scholar

Azzuz, Abd al-Rahman. al-Qada al-sha`bi. al-Qahirah: Dar Nahdat Misr lil-Tab` wa-al-Nashr, 1977.Google Scholar

Abdel Nasser, Gamal. Egypt’s Liberation: The Philosophy of the Revolution. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Abdel-Fadil, Mahmoud. The Political Economy of Nasserism: A Study in Employment and Income Distribution Policies in Urban Egypt, 1952–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Abraham, Henry J. The Judicial Process. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Abu al-Majd, Sabri. Sanawat ma qabla al-thawrah: Yanayir 1930–23 Yuliyu 1952 (al-juz’ 1). al-Qahirah: al-Hayah al-Misriyah al-`Ammah lil-Kitab: 1987.Google Scholar

Abu Basha, Hasan. Mudhakkirat Hasan Abu Basha fi al-amn wa-al-siyasah: Yanayir 1977, Uktubir 1981, Ramadan 1987. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Hilal, 1990.Google Scholar

Abū Qamar, Maḥmūd Riḍā. al-Qaḍā’ wa-al-wāqi’ al-siyāsī: dirāsah taṭbīqīyah ‘alá al-qaḍā’ ayn al-idārī wa-al-dustūrī fī Miṣr. al-Qahirah: Jāmi‘at ‘Ayn Shams, Kullīyat al-Ḥuqūq, 1995.Google Scholar

Abū Tālib, Hāmid Muhammad. Nizām al-qadā’ al-Misrī fī mīzān al-sharī’ah . al-Qahirah: Dār al-Fikr al-’Arabī, 1993.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A., Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Aḥmad, Rif’at Sayyid. Thawrat al-Jinarāl: qiṣṣat Jamāl ‘Abd al-Nāṣir kāmilah, min al-milād ilá al-mawt, 1918–1970: mawsū’ah fikrīyah wa-siyāsīyah. al-Qahirah: Dār al-Hudá. 1993.Google Scholar

Al-’Adili, Usamah Ahmad. al-Nizam al-siyāsī al-Misrī wa-al-tajribah al-lībirālīyah. al-Jīzah: Maktabat Nahdat al-Sharq, 1996.Google Scholar

Al-Baghdadi, Abd al-Latif. Mudhakkirāt ‘Abd al-Latif al-Baghdadi. al-Qahirah: al-Maktab al-Misrī al-Hadīth, 1977.Google Scholar

Albertus, Michael, and Menaldo, Victor. “Dictators as Founding Fathers? The Role of Constitutions under Autocracy.” Economics & Politics, 24, no. 3 (2012): 279–306.Google Scholar

Al-Bishri, Tariq, al-Dimuqratiyah wa-nizam 23 Yuliyu 1952–1970. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Hilal, 1991.Google Scholar

Al-Bishri, Tariq. al-Qaḍā’ al-Miṣrī bayna al-istiqlāl wa-al-iḥtiwā’ in ed. Zayd, Alā’ Abū and Ra‘ūf ‘Izzat, Hibah, al-Muwāṭanah al-Miṣrīyah wa-mustaqbal al-dīmuqrāṭīyah: ru‘á jadīdah li-’ālam mutaghayyir, al-Qahirah: Maktabat al-Shurūq al-Dawlīyah: 2005.Google Scholar

al-Bishri, Tariq. Al-Dimuqratiyah wa-al-Nasiriyah. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Thaqafah al-Jadidah, 1975.Google Scholar

al-Bishri, Tariq. Al-harakah al-siyāsīyah fī Misr, 1945–1952. al-Qahirah: al-Hay’ah al-Misrīyah al-’Āmmah lil-Kitāb, 1972.Google Scholar

al-Bishri, Tariq. Al-Qada al-Misri bayna al-istiqlal wa-al-ihtiwa. al-Qahirah: Maktabat al-Shuruq Al-Dawliyah, 2006.Google Scholar

al-Bishri, Tariq. Dirasat fi al-dimuqratiyah al-Misriyah. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Shuruq, 1987.Google Scholar

Al-Ghiryānī, Tal‘at. Fu’ād Sirāj al-Dīn: ustūrah … ākhir bāshawāt Misr. al-Qahirah: Dar Sfinks, 1995.Google Scholar

Al-Hakim, Tawfiq. The Return of Consciousness. New York: New York University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Al-Jarihi, Magdi. Majlis al-Dawlah (Qadai al-mashrū’īyah): al-musāwāh wa-al-ḥurrīyah. al-Qahirah: Dar el-Tahrir, 2006.Google Scholar

Al-Jarihi, Magdi. al-Maktab al-Fanni, al-Niyabah al-Idariyah. al-Niyabah al-Idariyah 1954–2004. al-Qahirah: al-Niyabah al-Idariyah, 2004.Google Scholar

Al-Naqd, Mahkamt. al-Kitāb al-dhahabī lil-mahākim al-ahlīyah 1883–1933 (al-juz’ 1). al-Qahirah: al-Matba‘ah al-Ami‘ri‘yah, 1937.Google Scholar

al-Naqd, Mahkamt. Al-Kitāb al-dhahabī lil-mahākim al-ahlīyah 1883–1933 (al-juz’ 2). al-Qahirah: al-Matba‘ah al-Ami‘ri‘yah, 1938.Google Scholar

Al-Nuwab, Majlis. Majmu`at madabit, (Session 3, al-juz’ 1). al-Qahirah: al-Matba`ah al-Amiriyah, 1926.Google Scholar

Al-Qasem, Anis. “The Injurious Acts under the Jordanian Civil Code.” Arab Law Quarterly, 4, no. 3 (August 1989): 183–198.Google Scholar

Al-Quda, Nadi. Mu’tamar al-‘Adālah al-Awwal, 1986: al-Wathā’iq al-asāsīyah: wathā’iq al-jalsatayn, al-iftitāḥīyah wa-al-khitāmīyah. al-Qahirah: Nadi al-Quda, 1986.Google Scholar

Al-Rāfi‘ī, Abd al-Rahmān. ‘Asr Ismā‘īl. al-Qahirah: Matba‘at al-Nahdah, 1932.Google Scholar

Al-Rifai, Yahia, Sh’wan regal al-quda’. al-Qahirah: Nadi al-Quda, 1991.Google Scholar

Al-Rifai, Yahia. mulḥaq Istiqlāl al-qaḍā’ wa-miḥnat al-intikhābāt. al-Qahirah: al-Maktab al-Miṣrī al-Ḥadīth, 2004.Google Scholar

Al-Rifai, Yahia. qudah ‘di’d al-astbdad. al-Qahirah: al-Maktab al-Miṣrī al-Ḥadīth, no date.Google Scholar

Al-Rifai, Yahia. Tashrī‘āt al-sulṭah al-qaḍā’īyah mu‘allaqan ‘alá nuṣūṣihā. Malāḥiq al-ṭab‘ah al-thānīyah. al-Qahirah: Nadi al-Quda, 1991.Google Scholar

al-Rifai, Yahia, Introduction to Hamadah Husni, ‘Abd al-Naṣir wa-al-qaḍaā. al-Qahirah: n. p., 2005.Google Scholar

Al-Sādāt, Anwar. al-Bahth ‘an al-dhāt: qissat hayātī. al-Qahirah: al-Maktab al-Misrī al-hadīth, 1978.Google Scholar

al-Sādāt, Anwar. Wasiyyatī. al-Qahirah: al-Maktab al-Misrī al-hadīth, 1982.Google Scholar

Al-Sanhuri, Nadiyah, and al-Shawi, Tawfīq, eds. ‘Abd al-Razzāq al-Sanhuri min khilāl awrāqihi al-shakhiīyah. al-Qahirah: al-Zahrā’ lil-I‘lām al-‘Arabī, 1988.Google Scholar

Al-Sharif, Muhammad. ‘Alā hamish al-dustur. al-Qahirah: n.p., 1938.Google Scholar

Al-shuyukh, Majlis. al-Dastur: wa-al-qawanin al-muttasilah bih. al-Qahirah: al-Matba`ah al-Amiriyah, 1938.Google Scholar

Amin, Galal A. al-Iqtiṣād wa-al-siyāsah wa-al-mujtama’ fī ‘aṣr al-infitāḥ. al-Qahirah: Maktabat Madbūlī, 1984.Google Scholar

Amos, Maurice S. “Legal Administration in Egypt.” Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, 3rd Ser., 12, no. 4 (1930): 168–187.Google Scholar

Aruri, Naseer H. “Disaster Area: Human Rights in the Arab World.” MERIP Middle East Report, 149 (November–December 1987): 6–9, 11–16.Google Scholar

Asfur, Sa‘d. al-qada al-Idari. al-Iskandariyah: Munsha‘at al-Ma‘arif, 1975.Google Scholar

Ayyubī, Ilyas. Ta’rikh Misr fī ‘ahd al-Khidiw Isma‘il Pasha: min sanat 1863 ila 1879, part 2. al-Qahirah: Matba‘at Dar al-Kutub al-Misrīyah, 1923.Google Scholar

Badawi, Abd al-Hamid. Majallat Majlis al-Dawla, al-Sanah 1, (Yanayir 1950).Google Scholar

Badowi, Abd al-Hamid. athr al-amtizat fi al-qudaa wa al-tashrea’ fi misr, in al-Kitāb al-dhahabī lil-mahākim al-ahlīyah, Mahkamt al-Naqd, al-juz’ 1. al-Qahirah: al-Matba‘ah al-Ami‘ri‘yah, 1937.Google Scholar

Baha al-Din, Ahmad. Shar`iyat al-sultah fi al-`alam al-`Arabi. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Shuruq, 1984.Google Scholar

Bahā’ al-Din, Ahmad. Mu‘āwarātī ma‘a al-Sadat. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Hilal, 1987.Google Scholar

Baker, Raymond William. Sadat and After: Struggles for Egypt’s Political Soul. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Bates, Robert. “Social Dilemmas and Rational Individuals: An Assessment of New Institutionalism” in ed. Harriss, John, Hunter, Janet, and Lewis, Colin M, The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Beattie, Kirk J. Egypt during the Nasser Years: Ideology, Politics, and Civil Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Bell, John. Judiciaries within Europe: A Comparative Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Berg, Bruce L. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston, MA: Pearson, 1998.Google Scholar

Bill, James A., and Leiden, Carl. Politics in the Middle East. Boston, MA: Little Brown, 1979.Google Scholar

Blaydes, Lisa. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Boix, Carles. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boix, Carles, and Svolik, Milan W.. “The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships.” Journal of Politics, 75, no. 2 (2013): 300–316.Google Scholar

Bogdan, Robert. “Participant Observation.” Peabody Journal of Education, 50, no. 4 (July 1973): 302–308.Google Scholar

Boulanger, Christian. “The Charisma of, Rationality in, and Legitimacy through Law: A Neo-Weberian Analysis of Post-Communist Constitutionalism.” Unpublished Manuscript, 2001.Google Scholar

Boyle, Kevin, and Sherif, Adel Omar, eds. Human Rights and Democracy: The Role of the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt. London: Kluwer Law International, 1996.Google Scholar

Brinton, Jasper Yeates. “The Closing of the Mixed Courts of Egypt.” The American Journal of International Law, 44, no. 2 (April 1950): 303–312.Google Scholar

Brinton, Jasper Yeates. The Council of State in Egypt. Cairo: American Embassy, 1951.Google Scholar

Brinton, Jasper Yeates. The Mixed Courts of Egypt. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Brownlee, Jason. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Brown, Nathan J. “Arab Administrative Courts and Judicial Control of the Bureaucracy,” paper presented to the annual conference of the Structure of Government Section, International Political Science Association, Ben-Gurion University, Israel, February 1997.Google Scholar

Brown, Nathan J. “Law and Imperialism: Egypt in Comparative Perspective Retrospective.” Law & Society Review, 29, no. 1 (1995): 103–126.Google Scholar

Brown, Nathan J. “Reining in the Executive: What Can the Judiciary Do?” paper presented to The Role of Judges in Political Reform in Egypt and the Arab World Conference, Cairo, April 1–3, 2006.Google Scholar

Brown, Nathan J. “The Precarious Life and Slow Death of the Mixed Courts of Egypt.” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 25, no. 1 (February 1993): 33–52.Google Scholar

Brown, Nathan J. The Rule of Law in the Arab World: Courts in Egypt and the Gulf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Brumberg, Daniel. “The Trap of Liberalized Autocracy.” Journal of Democracy, 13, no. 4 (2002): 56–68.Google Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. Subversive Institutions: The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Burgess, Susan. “Beyond Instrumental Politics: The New Institutionalism, Legal Rhetoric, and Judicial Supremacy.” Polity, 25 (1993): 445–459.Google Scholar

Cannon, Byron. Politics of Law and the Courts in Nineteenth-Century Egypt. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Casper, Jonathan. “The Supreme Court and National Policy-making.” American Political Science Review, 70, no. 1 (March 1976): 50–63.Google Scholar

Clayton, Cornell W., and Gillman, Howard, eds., Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Collier, David. “The Comparative Method,” in ed. Finifter, Ada, Political Science: The State of the Discipline II. Chicago, IL: American Political Science Association, 1993.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” The Journal of Public Law, 6 (Fall 1957): 279–295.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert. Modern Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1961.Google Scholar

Ḍayf Allāh, Sayyid Ismā’īl. Nazāhat al-intikhābāt wa-istiqlāl al-qaḍā’. al-Qahirah: Markaz al-Qahirah li-Dirāsāt Ḥuqūq al-Insān, 2000.Google Scholar

Dawisha, Adeed, and Zartman, I. William, eds. Beyond Coercion: The Durability of the Arab State. London: Croom Helm, 1988.Google Scholar

Dekmejian, R. Hrair. Egypt under Nasir: A Study in Political Dynamics. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1971.Google Scholar

De Mesquita, Bruce Bueno and Smith, Alastair. “Political Survival and Endogenous Institutional Change.” Comparative Political Studies, 42, no. 2 (2009), 167–197.Google Scholar

Dimitrov, Martin K., ed. Why Communism Did Not Collapse: Understanding Authoritarian Regime Resilience in Asia and Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Domingo, Pilar. “Judicialization of Politics or Politicization of the Judiciary? Recent Trends in Latin America.” Democratization, 11, no. 1 (February 2004): 104–126.Google Scholar

Domingo, Pilar. “Judicialization of Politics: The Changing Political Role of the Judiciary in Mexico,” in ed. Sieder, Rachel, Schjolden, Line, and Angell, Alan, The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, James, Nardulli, Peter F., and Flemming, Roy B.. The Contours of Justice: Communities and their Courts. Boston, MA: Little Brown, 1988.Google Scholar

El-Ghobashy, Mona. “Egypt’s Paradoxical Elections.” Middle East Report Online 238 (Spring 2006). Available from: www.merip.org/mer/mer238/elghobashy.html.Google Scholar

Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, and Melton, James. The Content of Authoritarian Constitutions, in eds. Ginsburg, Tom and Simpser, Alberto, Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

El-Mahdi, Rabab. Egypt: A Decade of Rupture, in eds. Khatib, Lina and Lust, Ellen, Taking to the Streets: The Transformation of Arab Activism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

El-Mahdi, Rabab. The Democracy Movement: Cycles of Protest, in eds. El-Mahdi, Rabab and Marfleet, Philip, Egypt: The Moment of Change. London: Zed Books, 2009.Google Scholar

El-Menoufi, Kamal. “The Orientations of Egyptian Peasants towards Political Authority between Continuity and Change.” Middle Eastern Studies, 18, no. 1 (January 1980): 82–93.Google Scholar

El-Mikawy, Noha.The Building of Consensus in Egypt’s Transition Process. Cairo: American University in Cairo: 1999.Google Scholar

El-Nahal, Galal H. The Judicial Administration of Ottoman Egypt in the Seventeenth Century. Minneapolis, MN: Bibliotheca Islamica, 1979.Google Scholar

El-Nawawy, Mohammed, and Iskandar, Adel. Al Jazeera: How the Free Arab News Network Scooped the World and Changed the Middle East. Cambridge: Westview Press, 2002.Google Scholar

El-Sadek, Ali. “Istqlal al-sultah al-qudae ‘an al-sultah al-tashreaa’.” al-Majallah al-Jinā’īyah al-qawmīyah 38, no. 1, 2, and 3 (March, July, and November 1995)Google Scholar

Epp, Charles R. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. The Choices Justices Make. Washington DC: CQ Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Ezrow, Natasha M., and Frantz, Erica. “State Institutions and The Survival of Dictatorships.” Journal of International Affairs, 65, no. 1 (Winter2011): 1–14.Google Scholar

Farahat, Mohamed Nour. “The Rule of Law: Can the Constitution be Unconstitutional?” Al-Ahram Weekly, 2–8 February 2006.Google Scholar

Fawzī, Hishām Muḥammad. Raqābat dustūrīyat al-qawānīn: dirāsah muqārinah bayna Amrīkā wa-Miṣr. al-Qahirah: Markaz al-Qahirah li-Dirāsāt Ḥuqūq al-Insān, 1999.Google Scholar

Finkel, Jodi S. “Judicial Reform as an ‘Insurance Policy’ in Mexico in the 1990s: A Supreme Court Willing and Able to Enter the Political Fray,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Political Science Association Research Committee on Comparative Judicial Studies, University of Parma, Parma, Italy, 2003.Google Scholar

Finkel, Jodi S. Judicial Reform as Political Insurance Argentina, Peru, and Mexico in the 1990, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Finklestone, Joseph. Anwar Sadat: Visionary who Dared. Essex: Frank Cass, 1995.Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen M. The Right Degree of Independence, in ed. Stotzky, Irwin, The Role of the Judiciary in the Transition to Democracy in Latin America. Boulder: Westview, 1993.Google Scholar

Fluharty, David Henning. “Charisma as Attachment to the Divine: Some Hasidic Principles for Comparison of Social Movements of Gandhi, Nasser, Ben-Gurion, and King,” Ph.D. diss., University of New Hampshire, 1990.Google Scholar

Frantz, Erica, and Ezrow, Natasha. The Politics of Dictatorships: Institutions and Outcomes in Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2011.Google Scholar

Frantz, Erica, and Kendall-Taylor, Andrea. “A Dictator’s Toolkit: Understanding How Co-optation Affects Repression in Autocracies.” Journal of Peace Research (2014): 51, 332–346.Google Scholar

Friedland, Martin L. A Place Apart: Judicial Independence and Accountability in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Judicial Council, 1995.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Carl J., and Brzezinski, Zbigniew K.. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. New York: Praeger, 1961.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Mary, and Hanson, Jonathan K.. “Coalitions, Carrots and Sticks: Economic Inequality and Authoritarian States.” PS: Political Science & Politics, 42, no. 4 (2009): 667–672.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Mary, and Hanson, Jonathan K.. Authoritarian Survival, Resilience, and the Selectorate Theory, in ed. Dimitrov, Martin K., Why Communism Did Not Collapse: Understanding Authoritarian Regime Resilience in Asia and Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam. “Cooperation, Cooptation and Rebellion under Dictatorships.” Economics and Politics, 18, no. 1 (March 2006), 1–26.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies, 40, no. 11 (November 2007): 1279–1301.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Jennifer. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Gates, John “Theory, Methods, and the New Institutionalism in Judicial Research.” in The American Courts: A Critical Assessment, ed. Gates, John and Johnson, Charles A.. Washington DC: CQ Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbra “What Do We Know about Democratization After Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science, 2 (1999): 115–144.Google Scholar

Gibson, James L. “Challenges to the Impartiality of State Supreme Courts: Legitimacy Theory and “New-Style” Judicial Campaigns.” American Political Science Review, 102, no. 1 (February 2008): 59–75.Google Scholar

Gibson, James L. “From Simplicity to Complexity: The Development of Theory in the Study of Judicial Behavior.” Political Behavior, 5, no. 1 (1983): 7–49.Google Scholar

Gillman, Howard, and Clayton, Cornell, eds. The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Ellis. Tinker, Tailor, Textile Worker. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1986.Google Scholar

Guarnieri, Carlo, and Pederzoli, Patrizia. The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Hāfiz, ‘Ulwī. al-Fasād. al-Jīzah: al-Sharikah al-‘Arabīyah al-Duwalīyah lil-Nashr wa-al-I’lām, 1991.Google Scholar

Hamzawy, Amr. “Opposition in Egypt Performance in the Presidential Election and Prospects for the Parliamentary Elections.” Policy Outlook, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Democracy, and Rule of Law Project, (October 2005): 6.Google Scholar

Hasan, Ammar Ali. Wizarat al-`Adl. al-Qahirah Markaz al-Dirasat al-Siyasiyah wa-al-Istiratijiyah, 2003.Google Scholar

Ḥasan, Iṣām al-Dīn Muḥammad. Shuhūd ‘ayān ‘alá al-intikhābāt al-barlamānīyah al-Miṣrīyah li-‘ām 2005. al-Qahirah: al-Majmū‘ah al-Muttaḥidah, 2006.Google Scholar

Hassan, Essam Edin, ed. Features of the Mass Media Landscape in Morocco, Egypt and Jordan: General Conclusions. Cairo: CIHRS, 2007.Google Scholar

Hassūnah, Isam. 23 Yūliyū-- wa-‘Abd al-Nasir: shahādatī. al-Qahirah: Markaz al-Ahram lil-Tarjamah wa-al-Nashr, 1990.Google Scholar

Heikal, Muhammad Hasanayn. Ahādīth fī al-‘āsifah. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Shurūq, 1987.Google Scholar

Heikal, Muhammad Hasanayn. Uktubir 73: al-silah wa-al-siyasah. al-Qahirah: Markaz al-Ahram lil-Tarjamah wa-al-Nashr, 1993.Google Scholar

Heydemann, Steven, and Leenders, Reinoud, eds. Middle East Authoritarianisms: Governance, Contestation, and Regime Resilience in Syria and Iran. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Hilāl, Alī al-Dīn. Taṭawwur al-niẓām al-siyāsī fī Miṣr, 1803–199. al-Qahirah: Markaz al-Buḥūth wa-al-Dirāsāt al-Siyāsīya, 1997.Google Scholar

Hilāl, Riḍā Muḥammad. “mawqif Lajnat shu’ūn al-aḥzāb min Ṭalabāt ta’sīs al-aḥzāb al-ṣaghīrah,” in ed. Hashim, Amr, al-Ahzab al-saghirah wa-al-nizam al-hizbi fi Misr,. al-Qahirah: Markaz al-Dirasat al-Siyasiyah wa-al-Istiratijiyah, 2003.Google Scholar

Hilal, Ali al-Din, Sayed, Moustafa Kamel, and Badr al-Din, Ikram. Tajribat al-dimuqratiyah fi Misr, 1970–1981. al-Qahirah: al-Markaz al-`Arabi lil-Bahth wa-al-Nashr, 1982.Google Scholar

Hilbink, Lisa. Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hill, Enid. “Al-Sanhuri and Islamic Law.” Cairo Papers in Social Science. Cairo: American University in Cairo, 1987.Google Scholar

Hill, Enid. “Courts and the Administration of Justice in the Modern Era,” in ed. Hanna, Nelly, The State and Its Servants: Administration in Egypt from Ottoman Times to the Present. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hill, Enid. “The Golden Anniversary of Egypt’s National Courts.” in ed. Edwards, Jill, Historians in Cairo: Essays in Honor of George Scanlon. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Hill, Enid. Mahkama! Studies in the Egyptian Legal System, Courts and Crimes, Law and Society. London: Ithaca Press London, 1979.Google Scholar

Hinnebusch, Raymond A. Jr Egyptian Politics under Sadat: The Post-populist Development of an Authoritarian-Modernizing State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Hirschal, Ran. Towards Juristocracy, The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran. “The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide.” Fordham Law Review, 75, no. 2 (2006): 721–754.Google Scholar

Hoyle, Mark S. W. “The Mixed Courts of Egypt: An Anniversary Assessment.” Arab Law Quarterly, 1, no. 1 (November 1985): 60–68.Google Scholar

Hoyle, Mark. Mixed Courts of Egypt. London: Graham & Trotman, 1991.Google Scholar

Husni, Hamadah. ‘Abd al-Nāṣir wa-al-qaḍā’: dirāsah wathā’iqīyah. al-Qahirah: n. p., 2005.Google Scholar

Imam, Abd Allah. Inqilab al-Sadat: ahdath Mayu 1971. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Khayyal, 2000.Google Scholar

Imām, Abd Allāh. Madhbahat al-qada’. al-Qahirah: Maktabat Madhbūlī, 1976.Google Scholar

Imām, Abd Allāh. Salāh Nasr yatadhakkar: al-mukhābarāt wa-al-thawrah. al-Qahirah: Mu’assasat Rūz al-Yūsuf, 1984.Google Scholar

Imam, Hamadah. al-Jins al-siyasi: al-`alaqah al-khafiyah bayna al-sultah wa-al-sihafah wa-al-fannanat. al-Jīzah: Madbuli al-Saghir, 2002.Google Scholar

Imarah, Muhammad. al-Duktur `Abd al-Razzaq al-Sanhuri: Islamiyah al-dawlah, wa-al-madaniyah, wa-al-qanun. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Rashad, 1999.Google Scholar

Imām, Sāmiyah Said. Man yamliku Miṣr?: dirāsah taḥlīlīyah lil-uṣūl al-ijtimā’īyah li-nukhbat al-infitāḥ al-iqtiṣādī fī al-mujtama’ al-Miṣrī, 1974–1980. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Mustaqbal al-’Arabi, 1986.Google Scholar

Israeli, Raphael. “I, Egypt”: Aspects of President Anwar al-Sadat’s Political Thought, Jerusalem Papers on Peace Problems. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, Hebrew University, 1981.Google Scholar

Israeli, Raphael. “The Pervasiveness of Islam in Contemporary Arab Political Discourse: The Cases of Sadat and Arafat,” in ed. Feldman, Ofer and De Landtsheer, Christ‘l, Politically Speaking: A Worldwide Examination of Language Used in the Political Sphere. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998.Google Scholar

Jackson, Donald W. “Judicial Independence in Cross-National Perspective,” in ed. American Bar Association, Judicial Independence: Essays, Bibliography, and Discussion Guide. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association, 1999.Google Scholar

Jamal, Yaḥyá. al-Qānūn al-dustūrī :ma‘a muqaddimah fī dirāsat al-mabādi’ al-dustūrīyah al-‘āmmah. al-Qahirah: Dārr al-Nahḍah al-’Arabīyah, 1995.Google Scholar

Jami`, Mahmud. `Araftu al-Sadat: nasf qarn min khafaya al-Sadat wa-al-Ikhwan. al-Qahirah: al-Maktub al-Misri al-Hadith, 1998.Google Scholar

Jindi, Abd al-Halim. Nujum al-muhamah fi Misr wa-Urubba: al-Halbawi, al-Sanhuri, Mustafá Mar`i, Marshal Hawl, Hanri Rawbayr. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Ma`arif, 1991.Google Scholar

Jirishah, Ali. Fi al-zinzanah. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Shuruq, 1975.Google Scholar

Kassem, Maye. In the Guise of Democracy: Governance in Contemporary Egypt. Reading, UK: Ithaca Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Khan, Paul W. “Independence and Responsibility in Judicial Rule,” in ed. Stotzky, Irwin, The Role of the Judiciary in the Transition to Democracy in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1993.Google Scholar

Khānkī, Azīz. al-Mahākim al-mukhtalitah wa-al-mahākim al-ahlīyah: mādīhā, hādirhā, mustaqbalahā. al-Qahirah: al-Matba‘ah al-‘Asrīyah, 1939.Google Scholar

Kienle, Eberhard. Grand Delusion: Democracy and Economic Reform in Egypt. London: I. B. Tauris & Company, 2001.Google Scholar

Kulliyat, al-Huquq. al-Mutamar al-`Ilmi al-Awwal li-Kulliyat al-Huquq: dawr al-Mahkamah al-Dusturiyah al-`Ulya fi al-nizam al-qanuni al-Misri. al-Qahirah: Jami`at Hulwan, 1998.Google Scholar

Lacouture, Jean. The Demigods: Charismatic Leadership in the Third World. New York: Knopf, 1970.Google Scholar

Landry, Pierre. The Institutional Diffusions of Courts in China: Evidence from Survey Data, in eds. Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Langohr, Vickie. “Cracks in Egypt’s Electoral Engineering: The 2000 Vote.” Middle East Report Online, November 7, 2000.Google Scholar

Larkins, Christopher M. “Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis.” The American Journal of Comparative Law, 44, no. 4 (Autumn 1996): 605–626.Google Scholar

Law, David S., and Versteeg, Mila. Constitutional Variations among Strains of Authoritarianism, in eds. Ginsburg, Tom and Simpser, Alberto, Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Leenders, Reinoud. Prosecuting Political Dissent: Courts and the Resilience of Authoritarianism in Syria,” in eds. Heydemann, Steven and Leenders, Reinoud, Middle East Authoritarianisms: Governance, Contestation, and Regime Resilience in Syria and Iran. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Liebesny, Herbert J. The Law of the Near & Middle East: Readings, Cases, & Materials. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Lust-Okar, Ellen. Structuring Conflict in the Arab World: Incumbents, Opponents, and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Magaloni, Beatriz. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Magaloni, Beatriz. “Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies, 41 (2008): 715–741.Google Scholar

Magaloni, Beatriz, Enforcing the Autocratic Political Order and the Role of the Courts, in eds. Moustafa, Tamir and Ginsburg, Tom, Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. “Comparative Historical Analysis: Achievements and Agendas,” in ed. Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James. “Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research, 28, no. 4 (May 2000): 387–424.Google Scholar

Majlis al-Sha‘b, al-Lajnah al-Tashrī‘īyah. al-Qawanin al-asasiyah al-mukammilah lil-dustur: ma‘a mudhakkirathā al-idahīyah wa-taqarir Lajnat al-Shu‘ūn al-Tashri‘iyah wa-munaqashat al-majlis, (al-juz’ 2). al-Qahirah: al-Hay’ah al- ‘Āmmah li-Shu‘ūn al-Maṭābi’ al-Amīrīyah, 1974.Google Scholar

Mallat, Chibli. “Constitutional Law in the Middle East: The Emergence of Judicial Power.” University of London, SOAS Law Department Working Papers, Working Paper no. 3 (February 1993).Google Scholar

Mansfield, Peter. Nasser’s Egypt. Baltimore: Penguin, 1965.Google Scholar

Mansur, Ahmad Subhi, ed. Dawr al-qada fi da`m thaqafat al-mujtama` al-madani: halaqat niqashiyah. al-Qahirah: Markaz Ibn Khaldun lil-Dirasat al-Inmaiyah, 1997.Google Scholar

Marvell, Thomas B. Appellate Courts and Lawyers: Information Gathering in the Adversary System. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. The Communist Manifesto. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. Divided we Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

McDermott, Anthony. Egypt from Nasser to Mubarak: a Flawed Revolution. London: Croom Helm, 1988.Google Scholar

Mekki, Ahmed. al-ṣidām bin al-niẓām al-Nāṣiri wa al-quḍāt, in ed. `Abd al-Fattāh, Nabīl. al-Quḍāh wa-al-iṣlāḥ al-siyāsī. al-Qahirah: Markaz al-Qahirah li-Dirāsāt Ḥuqūq al-Insān, 2006.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 21. ed. Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Moustafa, Tamir. “Law versus the State: The Expansion of Constitutional Power in Egypt, 1980–2001.” Ph.D. diss. University of Washington, 2002.Google Scholar

Moustafa, Tamir. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Muhammad, Anwar. Shuhud ‘asr al-Sadat. al-Qahirah: Dar Ayh Imm lil-Nashr wa-al-Tawzi’, 1990.Google Scholar

Murad, Abd al-Fattah. al-Mukhalafat al-tadibiyah lil-qudah wa-a`da’ al-niyabah: dirasah tahliliyah wa-ta’siliyah muqaranah. al-Iskandariyah: `A. al-F. Murad, 1993.Google Scholar

Murphy, Walter F., and Tanenhaus, Joseph. “Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court: Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime Change.” Law & Society Review, 2, no. 3 (May 1968): 357–384.Google Scholar

Murray-Brown, Jeremy, Anderson, Raymond H., and Fonda, Henry. Nasser People’s Pharaoh. Northbrook: Nielsen-Ferns International and New York Times Productions, 1979.Google Scholar

Muti`i, Lam`I. Haulai al-rijal min Misr. al-Qahirah: al-Hayah al-Misriyah al-`Ammah lil-Kitab, 1987.Google Scholar

Naguib, Mohammed. Kalimati lil-ta‘rikh. al-Qahirah: Dār al-Kitāb al-Namūzaji, 1975.Google Scholar

Najib, Muḥammad Fatḥi. al-Tanẓim al-qadai al-Misri. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Ṭiba‘ah al-Ḥadithah, 1998.Google Scholar

Nasar, Mumtaz. Ma‘rakat al-‘adalah fi Misr. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Shurūk, 1974.Google Scholar

Neuman, William Lawrence. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2000.Google Scholar

North, Douglas, and Weingast, Barry. “Constitution and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” The Journal of Economic History, 49, no. 4 (December 1989): 803–832.Google Scholar

North, Douglass C. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton, 1981.Google Scholar

Nutting, Anthony. Nasser. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1972.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, Guillermo. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies, 1973.Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur. “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development.” American Political Science Review, 87, no. 3 (September 1993), 567–576.Google Scholar

Osiel, Mark J., “Dialouge with Dictators: Judicial Resistance in Argentina and Brazil.” Law and Social Inquiry, 20, no. 2 (Spring 1995).Google Scholar

Pasha, Nubar. Nūbār fī Misr, ‘arḍ wa-taqdīm Nabīl Zakī Nabīl Zakī. al-Qahirah: Mu’assasat Akhbār al-Yawm, 1991.Google Scholar

Pereira, Anthony W. Political (In)Justice: Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law in Brazil, Chile, and Argentina, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Peerenboom, Randall P. Asian Discourse of Rule of Law. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Pepinsky, Thomas. “The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism.” British Journal of Political Science, 44, no. 3 (July 2014): 631–653.Google Scholar

Perlmutter, Amos. Egypt, the Praetorian State. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1974.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul, and Skocpol, Theda. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science,” in ed. Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., Political Science: The State of the Discipline. New York, NY: Norton, 2002.Google Scholar

Powell, Ivor. Disillusion by the Nile: What Nasser Has Done to Egypt. London: Solstice Production, 1967.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. The Games of Transition, in eds. Mainwaring, S., O’Donnell, G. A., and Valenzuela, J. S., Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Qatri, Mahmoud. Tazwīr Dawlah: shihādāt. al-istibdād wa-tazwīr al-intikhābāt. al-Jīzah: Markaz al-Mustaqbal al-Miṣrī, 2005.Google Scholar

Quinlivan, James T. “Coup-proofing: Its Practice and Consequences in the Middle East.” International Security, 24, no. 2 (Fall 1999): 131–165.Google Scholar

Ra‘fat, Wahid. Dirāsāt fī ba‘d al-qawānīn al-munazzimah lil-hurrīyāt. al-Iskandarīyah: Munsha‘at al-Ma‘ārif, 1981.Google Scholar

Ra‘fat, Wahid. Fusul min Thawrat 23 Yulyu. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Shuruq, 1978.Google Scholar

Radwan, Fathi. 72 shahran ma‘a ‘Abd al-Nasir. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Hurriyah, 1986.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Reid, Donald M. Lawyers and Politics in the Arab World, 1880–1960. Minneapolis, MN: Bibliotheca Islamica, 1981.Google Scholar

Roberson, B. A. “The Emergence of the Modern Judiciary in the Middle East: Negotiating the Mixed Courts of Egypt,” in ed. Mallat, Chibli, Islam and Public Law. London: Graham & Trotman, 1993.Google Scholar

Root, Hilton L., and May, Karen. Judicial Systems and Economic Development, in eds. Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Rosberg, James. “Roads to the Rule of Law: The Emergence of an Independent Judiciary in Contemporary Egypt.” Ph.D. diss. MIT, 1995.Google Scholar

Rowland, C. K., and Carp, Robert A.. Politics and Judgment in Federal District Courts. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1996.Google Scholar

Russell, Peter H., and O’Brien, David M., eds. Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2001.Google Scholar

Rutherford, Bruce K. Egypt after Mubarak: Liberalism, Islam, and Democracy in the Arab World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Rutherford, Bruce K. “The Struggle for Constitutionalism in Egypt,” Ph. D. diss., Yale University, 1999, 286–287.Google Scholar

Safran, Nadav. Egypt in Search of Political Community. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Said, Atef Shahat. “dor Nadi al-qudah fi ta’ziz istqlal alquda wa al’ashalh alsiasi,” in ed. Fattah, Nabil Abdel, dwar al-qudah fi al-aslah al-siasi. al-Qahirah: Markaz al-Qahirah li-Dirāsāt Ḥuqūq al-Insān, 2006.Google Scholar

Said, Atef Shahat. “The Judges Club of Egypt: A Space for Defending Democracy and Independence of the Judiciary.” MA Thesis, American University in Cairo, 2004.Google Scholar

Salah, Abdullah. “al-dawr al-siyāsī lal-qaḍa’ al-Miṣrī,” in al-Taṭawwur al-siyāsī fī Miṣr, 1982–1992, ed. Muḥammad Ṣafī al-Dīn Kharbūsh. al-Qahirah, Jāmi’at al-Qahirah, Kullīyat al-Iqtiṣād wa-al-’Ulūm al-Siyāsīyah, Markaz al-Buḥūth wa-al-Dirāsāt al-Siyāsīyah, 1994.Google Scholar

Ṣāliḥ, Ibrāhīm Alī. al-Wajīz fī sharḥ qānūn al-Mudda‘ī al-‘Āmm al-Ishtirākī. al-Qahirah: ‘Ālam al-Kutub 1986.Google Scholar

Salim, Latifah Muhammad. Tarikh al-qadai al-Misri al-hadith, al-juz’ 1, 1875–1914. al-Qahirah: al-Hayah al-Misriyah al-`Ammah lil-Kitab: 2000.Google Scholar

Salim, Latifah Muhammad. Tarikh al-qadai al-Misri al-hadith, al-juz’ 2, 1914–1952. al-Qahirah: al-Hayah al-Misriyah al-`Ammah lil-Kitab: 2000.Google Scholar

Salīm, Muḥammad al-Sayyid. al-Taḥlīl al-siyāsī al-Nāṣirī: dirāsah fī al-’aqā’id wa-al-siyāsah al-khārijīyah. Bayrūt: Markaz Dirāsāt al-Waḥdah al-’Arabīyah, 1983.Google Scholar

Scheb, John M. II, Ungs, Thomas D., and Hayes, Allison L., “Judicial Role Orientations, Attitudes and Decision Making: A Research Note.” The Western Political Quarterly, 42, no. 3 (September 1989): 427–435.Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey, and Spaeth, Harold J.. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Shalakany, Amr. “‘I Heard It All Before’: Egyptian Tales of Law and Development.” Third World Quarterly, 27, no. 5 (July 2006): 833–853.Google Scholar

Shambayati, Hootan, “A Tale of Two Mayors: Courts Politics in Iran and Turkey.” International Journal. Middle East Studies, 36, no. 2 (2004): 253–275.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin. Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, in eds. Ginsburg, and Moustafa, , Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin, and Sweet, Alec Stone. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Sharqāwī, Su‘ād, and Nāṣif, Abd Allāh. Nuẓum al-intikhabāt fī al-‘ālam wa-fī Miṣr. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Nahḍah al-’Arabīyah, 1994.Google Scholar

Sharqāwī, Su‘ād. Nisbīyat al-ḥurrīyāt al-‘āmmah wa-in’ikāsātuhā ‘alá al-tanẓīm al-qānūnī. al-Qahirah: Dār al-Nahḍah al-’Arabīyah, 1979.Google Scholar

Sherif, Adel Omar. “Attacks on the Judiciary: Judicial Independence – Reality or Fallacy?” in ed. Cotran, Eugene, Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law, Volume 6, 1999–2000. London; Kluwer Law International, 2001.Google Scholar

Shetreet, Shimon, and Dordrecht, Jules Deschênes, eds. Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1985.Google Scholar

Shetreet, Shimon, and Forsyth, Christopher, eds. The Culture of Judicial Independence: Conceptual Foundations and Practical Challenges. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012.Google Scholar

Shuhayb, Abd al-Qādir. Muḥākamat al-infitāḥ al-iqtiṣādī fī Miṣr. Beirut: Dār Ibn Khaldūn 1979.Google Scholar

Sieder, Rachel, Schjolden, Line, and Angell, Alan, eds. The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Gordon. Singapore: The Exception That Proves Rules Matter, in eds. Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Ṣiyām, Sirrī. “al-Qaḍā’ al-Tabī’ī al-Musāwāh amāma al-qaḍā” in ed. Minyāwī, Badr, al-Musāwāh amāma al-qaḍā. al-Qahirah: al-Markaz al-Qawmī lil-Buhūth al-Ijtimā’īyah wa-al-Jinā’īyah, 1991.Google Scholar

Smith, Benjamin. “Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party Rule.” World Politics, 57 (2005): 421–451.Google Scholar

Smith, Charles Anthony. “Credible Commitments and the Avoidance of War: The Role of the Judiciary in emerging Federations and Re-emerging Nations.” Ph.D. diss. University of California – San Diego, 2004.Google Scholar

Springborg, Robert. Mubarak’s Egypt: Fragmentation of the Political Order. Boulder: Westview Press. 1989.Google Scholar

St. John, Robert. The Boss: The Story of Gamal Abdel Nasser. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Stovall, Howard L. “Arab Commercial Laws--Into the Future.” The International Lawyer, 34 (Fall 2000): 839–847.Google Scholar

Tanneberg, Dag, Stefes, Christoph, and Merkel, Wolfgang. “Hard Times and Regime Failure: Autocratic Responses to Economic Downturns.” Contemporary Politics, 19, no. 1 (2013): 115–129.Google Scholar

Tashakkori, Abbas, and Teddlie, Charles. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.Google Scholar

Tate, C. Neal, and Vallinder, Torbjorn, eds. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Tiefer, Charles. “Egypt’s Parliamentary Election Ends on an Undemocratic Note.” Available from: www.forbes.com/sites/charlestiefer/2015/12/21/egypts-parliamentary-election-ends-on-an-undemocratic-note/#f29872755a56Google Scholar

Vogel, Frank E. Islamic Law and Legal System: Studies of Saudi Arabia. Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar

Volpi, Frédéric, and Cavatorta, Francesco, eds. Democratization in the Muslim World: Changing Patterns of Authority and Power. New York: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Ubayd, Muḥammad Kāmil. Istiqlāl al-qaḍā’: dirāsah muqāranah. al-Qahirah: Nādī al-Quḍāh, 1991.Google Scholar

Wahbī, Azzah. al-Sulṭah al-tashrī’īyah fī al-niẓām al-siyāsī al-Miṣrī ba‘da Yūliyū 1952. al-Qahirah: Markaz al-Dirāsāt al-Siyāsīyah wa-al-Istirātījīyah, 1993.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. “Politics as a Vocation.” In ed. Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C., From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. trans. by Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, Talcott. New York: Oxford University Press, 1947.Google Scholar

Wickham, Carrie Rosefsky. Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism and Political Change in Egypt. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Wright, Joseph. “Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment.” American Journal of Political Science, 52 (2008): 322–343.Google Scholar

Wright, Joseph, and Escribà-Folch, Abel. “Authoritarian Institutions and Regime Survival: Transitions to Democracy and Subsequent Autocracy,” British Journal of Political Science, 42, no. 2 (April 2012): 283–309.Google Scholar

Wynn, Wilton. Nasser of Egypt; the Search for Dignity. Cambridge: Arlington Books, 1959.Google Scholar

Yūnus, Sharīf. Istiqlāl al-qaḍā. al-Qahirah: Markaz al-Qahirah li-Dirāsāt Ḥuqūq al-Insān, 2007.Google Scholar

Yūsuf, Hāmid Ahmad. ‘Abd al-Nāsir wa-aqzām al-sultah. al-Iskandarīyah: Dar al-Huda lil-Matbu‘at, 1989.Google Scholar

Zahran, Gamal. “al-dawr al-siyāsī lal-qaḍa’ al-Miṣrī fi ṣun’ al-qarār,” in ed. al-Dīn Hilāl, Alī, Al-Niẓām al-siyāsī al-Miṣrī: al-taghayyur wa-al-istimrār. al-Qahirah: Maktabat al-Nahḍah al-Miṣrīyah, 1988.Google Scholar

Zayani, Mohamed. “Introduction–Al Jazeera and Vicissitudes of the New Arab Mediascape,” in ed. Zayani, Mohamed, The Al Jazeera Phenomenon: Critical Perspectives on New Arab Media. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2005.Google Scholar

Zayyāt, Muḥammad Abd al-Salām. al-Sādāt, al-qinā’ wa-al-ḥaqīqah. Kitāb al-Ahālī, raqm 18. al-Qahirah: Jarīdat al-Ahālī, 1989.Google Scholar

Zayyāt, Muḥammad ‘Abd al-Salām. Miṣr ilá ayn: qirā’āt wa-khawāṭir fī al-dustūr al-dā’im 1971. al-Qahirah: Dār al-Mustaqbal al-‘Arabī, 1986.Google Scholar

Zelditch, Morris. “Some Methodological Problems of Field Studies.” American Journal of Sociology, 67, no. 5 (March 1962): 566–576.Google Scholar