Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T16:16:48.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Social justice in multicultural societies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

David Miller
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

This chapter will examine obstacles to the pursuit of social justice posed by the multicultural character of virtually all contemporary liberal democracies. A society is multicultural, for present purposes, when its citizens belong to a number of distinct ethnic and/or religious groups, and membership of these groups is regarded as an important source of personal identity. Multiculturalism, in other words, requires more than just the coexistence in a single society of various religions, musical cultures, ethnic cuisines and so forth. It requires that people see themselves as belonging to groups defined by one or more of these cultural markers, as having a special relationship with other members of that group and as regarding their group identity as significant and valuable. In other words, we can legitimately speak of multicultural societies as made up of distinct cultural communities, while of course recognizing that the boundaries that exist between these communities are not always sharp – some people, by virtue of intermarriage, for instance, will see themselves as straddling two or more cultural groups.

The issue I want to address is the implications this has for the pursuit of social justice. One aspect of the question has already been dealt with quite extensively in the literature: What special claims, if any, can cultural groups make in the name of justice, especially groups that have hitherto fared relatively badly in the distribution of social resources? There have been wide-ranging debates about the justifiability of special rights for disadvantaged groups, and about the legitimacy of affirmative action programmes, for instance. However, my aim here is to tackle a different question, namely does the very idea of social justice still make sense when societies become multicultural in the sense just outlined? This might seem an odd question to ask. It makes some sense, however, if we make the following assumption about social justice: that for a society to be socially just, it is not sufficient that its basic social and political institutions should distribute resources according to valid principles of justice, but it is also necessary that these principles themselves should be a matter of reasonable agreement among the members. In other words, a just society is one whose members live together on terms of justice – they live according to principles that each has good reason to accept.

Type
Chapter
Information
Justice for Earthlings
Essays in Political Philosophy
, pp. 70 - 92
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 90Google Scholar
Rawls, J., Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), p. 12Google Scholar
Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Kukathas, C., ‘Social Justice and the Nation-State: A Modest Attack’ in D. Bell and A. De-Shalit (eds.), Forms of Justice (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002)Google Scholar
Bobo, L., ‘Race, Interests, and Beliefs About Affirmative Action’, American Behavioural Scientist, 41 (1998), 985–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), ch. 4Google Scholar
Svallfors, S. (ed.), In the Eye of the Beholder (Umea: Bank of Sweden, 1995)Google Scholar
Kluegel, J.R., Mason, D.S. and Wegener, B. (eds.), Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, G., Swift, A, Routh, D. and Burgoyne, C., ‘What Is and What Ought to Be: Popular Beliefs About Distributive Justice in Thirteen Countries’, European Sociological Review, 15 (1999), 349–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Listhaug, O. and Aalberg, T., ‘Comparative Public Opinion on Distributive Justice: A Study of Equality Ideals and Attitudes toward Current Policies’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 40 (1999), 117–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G., Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (London: Sage, 1980)Google Scholar
Kashima, Y., Siegal, M., Tanaka, K. and Isaka, H., ‘Universalism in Lay Conceptions of Distributive Justice: a Cross-Cultural Examination’, International Journal of Psychology, 23 (1988), 51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K. and Bond, M., ‘The Impact of Cultural Collectivism on Reward Allocation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (1984), 793–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, C.H., Triandis, H.C. and Yee, C., ‘Cultural Differences in Reward Allocation: Is Collectivism the Explanation?’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 30 (1991), 145–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earley, P. C. and Erez, M. (eds.), New Perspectives on International Industrial/Organizational Psychology (San Francisco: New Lexington Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Murphy-Berman, V., Berman, J., Singh, P., Pachauri, A. and Kumar, P., ‘Factors Affecting Allocation to Needy and Meritorious Recipients: a Cross-Cultural Comparison’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (1984), 1267–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegal, M. and Shwalb, D., ‘Economic Justice in Adolescence: An Australian-Japanese Comparison’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 6 (1985), 313–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A. and Kumar, K. (eds.), Dilemmas of Liberal Democracies: Studies in Fred Hirsch's ‘Social Limits to Growth’ (London: Tavistock, 1983), pp. 181–2Google Scholar
Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983), ch. 3.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D. (ed.), The Handbook of Culture and Psychology (Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 382Google Scholar
Elster, J., Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens (Cambridge University Press, 1992), p. 75Google Scholar
Sullivan, J.L., Piereson, J. and Marcus, G.E, Political Tolerance and American Democracy (University of Chicago Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Sniderman, P.M., Tetlock, P.E., Glaser, J.M, Green, D.P. and Hout, M., ‘Principled Tolerance and the American Mass Public’, British Journal of Political Science, 19 (1989), 25–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piliavin, J.A., Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L. and Clark, R.D., Emergency Intervention (New York: Academic Press, 1981), pp. 144–59Google Scholar
Dovidio, J.F., ‘Helping Behavior and Altruism’ in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 17 (London: Academic Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and Ferrara, E. La, ‘Who Trusts Others?’, Journal of Public Economics, 85 (2002), 207–34, p. 222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschall, M.J and Stolle, D., ‘Race in the City: Neighbourhood Context and the Development of Generalized Trust’, Political Behavior, 26 (2004), 125–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parijs, P. Van (ed.), Cultural Diversity versus Economic Solidarity (Brussels: De Boeck, 2004)Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E. and Sacerdote, B., ‘Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?’, in Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2001 (2), 187–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000), ch. 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A., Baqir, R. and Easterly, W., ‘Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (1999), 1243–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., On Nationality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), chs. 4–5Google Scholar
Miller, D., Citizenship and National Identity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000), ch. 4Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×