Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T16:59:31.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2022

Dmitri Levitin
Dmitri Levitin
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Kingdom of Darkness
Bayle, Newton, and the Emancipation of the European Mind from Philosophy
 , pp. 853 - 934
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

LR.4.c.2. Louis XIV’s copy of Confucius Sinarum philosophus, sive Scientia Sinensis Latine exposita (Paris, 1687).Google Scholar
Arch. A d.37. Nicolas Fatio de Duillier’s copy of Isaac Newton, Principia (1687).Google Scholar
Savile A.19. Christopher Wren’s copy of Galileo, Opere (Bologna, 1656).Google Scholar
4° Rawl. 150. Matthew Wren’s copy of Ward’s Gratia discriminans (London, 1627).Google Scholar
Locke 7.10. Locke’s copy of Charles Maigrot and Nicolas Charmot, Historia cultus Sinensium (Cologne, 1700).Google Scholar
C.24.b.21. Samuel Clarke’s copy of The Book of Common Prayer (London, 1724).Google Scholar
Adv.b.39.1. Newton’s self-annotated copy of the Principia (1687).Google Scholar
Z.D.4.8. David Gregory’s copy of George Cheyne, Philosophical principles of natural religion (London, 1705).Google Scholar
601832. Newton’s copy of Joseph Mede, Works (1672).Google Scholar
Burndy 700883. Newton’s copy of Edward Stillingfleet, A discourse concerning the idolatry practised in the Church of Rome (London, 1673).Google Scholar
Adv.b.1.6. Locke’s copy of Newton, Principia (1687), with some corrections by Newton.Google Scholar
NQ.8.23. Newton’s copy of Enyedi’s Explicationes locorum Veteris & Novi Testamenti, ex quibus Trinitatis dogma stabiliri solet (Groningen, 1670).Google Scholar
NQ.8.28–9. Newton’s copy of Kabbala denudata seu Doctrina Hebræorum transcendentalis et metaphysica atque theologica … ed. Knorr von Rosenroth, C., 2 vols (Frankfurt, 1677–84).Google Scholar
NQ.8.462. Newton’s copy of G. J. Vossius, Theologia gentilis (Amsterdam, 1641).Google Scholar
NQ.8.56. Newton’s copy of Thomas Burnet, Archæologiæ philosophicæ: sive Doctrina antiqua de rerum originibus (London, 1692).Google Scholar
NQ.8.65. Newton’s copy of George Cheyne, Philosophical principles of natural religion (London, 1705).Google Scholar
NQ.8.70. Newton’s copy of Macrobius, Opera (Leiden, 1628).Google Scholar
NQ.8.82. Newton’s copy of G. W. Leibniz, Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l’homme et l’origine du mal (Amsterdam, 1710).Google Scholar
NQ.8.97. Newton’s copy of Peter King, History of the Apostles Creed (London, 1702).Google Scholar
NQ.9.17. Newton’s copy of Christopher Sand, Nucleus historiae ecclesiasticae ([Amsterdam], 1669).Google Scholar
NQ.9.73. Newton’s copy of Lucretius, De rerum natura libri VI (Cambridge, 1686).Google Scholar
NQ.9.96–108. Newton’s copy of Plutarch, Opera, 13 vols (Geneva, 1572).Google Scholar
NQ.9.109–10. Newton’s copy of Jacques Basnage, Antiquitez judaïques, 2 vols (Amsterdam, 1713).Google Scholar
NQ.10.62. Newton’s copy of Jean Le Clerc, Historia Ecclesiastica duorum primorum a Christo Nato saeculorum (Amsterdam, 1716).Google Scholar
NQ.11.17. Newton’s copy of Tertullian, Opera (Paris, 1634).Google Scholar
NQ.11.26. Newton’s copy of Iamblichus, De mysteriis Liber. Præmittitur Epistola Porphyrii ad Anebonem Ægyptium, eodem argumento, ed. Gale, Thomas (Oxford, 1678).Google Scholar
NQ.16.149. Newton’s presentation copy of John Wallis, Mechanica (London, 1669–71).Google Scholar
NQ.16.168. Newton’s copy of Edward Stillingfleet, An answer to several late treatises (London, 1673).Google Scholar
NQ.16.190. Newton’s copy of Jacques Rohault, Physica, ed. and trans. Samuel Clarke, 3rd ed. (London, 1710).Google Scholar
NQ.16.200. Newton’s self-annotated copy of the Principia (1687).Google Scholar
NQ.17.18. Newton’s copy of John Spencer, De legibus Hebraeorum (Cambridge, 1683–4).Google Scholar
NQ.17.21. Newton’s copy of Diogenes Laertius, De vitis dogmatis et apophthegmatis eorum qui in philosophia claruerunt libri X, ed. Ménage, G. (London, 1664).Google Scholar
NQ.18.10. Newton’s copy of Irenaeus, Adversus Valentini, & similium Gnosticorum hæreses … Cum scholiis & annotationibus J. Billii, F. Ducæi, & F. Feu-ardentii (Paris, 1675).Google Scholar
NQ.18.36. Newton’s copy of Vincent Wing, Astronomia Britannica (London, 1669).Google Scholar
LR.4.c.2. Louis XIV’s copy of Confucius Sinarum philosophus, sive Scientia Sinensis Latine exposita (Paris, 1687).Google Scholar
Arch. A d.37. Nicolas Fatio de Duillier’s copy of Isaac Newton, Principia (1687).Google Scholar
Savile A.19. Christopher Wren’s copy of Galileo, Opere (Bologna, 1656).Google Scholar
4° Rawl. 150. Matthew Wren’s copy of Ward’s Gratia discriminans (London, 1627).Google Scholar
Locke 7.10. Locke’s copy of Charles Maigrot and Nicolas Charmot, Historia cultus Sinensium (Cologne, 1700).Google Scholar
C.24.b.21. Samuel Clarke’s copy of The Book of Common Prayer (London, 1724).Google Scholar
Adv.b.39.1. Newton’s self-annotated copy of the Principia (1687).Google Scholar
Z.D.4.8. David Gregory’s copy of George Cheyne, Philosophical principles of natural religion (London, 1705).Google Scholar
601832. Newton’s copy of Joseph Mede, Works (1672).Google Scholar
Burndy 700883. Newton’s copy of Edward Stillingfleet, A discourse concerning the idolatry practised in the Church of Rome (London, 1673).Google Scholar
Adv.b.1.6. Locke’s copy of Newton, Principia (1687), with some corrections by Newton.Google Scholar
NQ.8.23. Newton’s copy of Enyedi’s Explicationes locorum Veteris & Novi Testamenti, ex quibus Trinitatis dogma stabiliri solet (Groningen, 1670).Google Scholar
NQ.8.28–9. Newton’s copy of Kabbala denudata seu Doctrina Hebræorum transcendentalis et metaphysica atque theologica … ed. Knorr von Rosenroth, C., 2 vols (Frankfurt, 1677–84).Google Scholar
NQ.8.462. Newton’s copy of G. J. Vossius, Theologia gentilis (Amsterdam, 1641).Google Scholar
NQ.8.56. Newton’s copy of Thomas Burnet, Archæologiæ philosophicæ: sive Doctrina antiqua de rerum originibus (London, 1692).Google Scholar
NQ.8.65. Newton’s copy of George Cheyne, Philosophical principles of natural religion (London, 1705).Google Scholar
NQ.8.70. Newton’s copy of Macrobius, Opera (Leiden, 1628).Google Scholar
NQ.8.82. Newton’s copy of G. W. Leibniz, Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l’homme et l’origine du mal (Amsterdam, 1710).Google Scholar
NQ.8.97. Newton’s copy of Peter King, History of the Apostles Creed (London, 1702).Google Scholar
NQ.9.17. Newton’s copy of Christopher Sand, Nucleus historiae ecclesiasticae ([Amsterdam], 1669).Google Scholar
NQ.9.73. Newton’s copy of Lucretius, De rerum natura libri VI (Cambridge, 1686).Google Scholar
NQ.9.96–108. Newton’s copy of Plutarch, Opera, 13 vols (Geneva, 1572).Google Scholar
NQ.9.109–10. Newton’s copy of Jacques Basnage, Antiquitez judaïques, 2 vols (Amsterdam, 1713).Google Scholar
NQ.10.62. Newton’s copy of Jean Le Clerc, Historia Ecclesiastica duorum primorum a Christo Nato saeculorum (Amsterdam, 1716).Google Scholar
NQ.11.17. Newton’s copy of Tertullian, Opera (Paris, 1634).Google Scholar
NQ.11.26. Newton’s copy of Iamblichus, De mysteriis Liber. Præmittitur Epistola Porphyrii ad Anebonem Ægyptium, eodem argumento, ed. Gale, Thomas (Oxford, 1678).Google Scholar
NQ.16.149. Newton’s presentation copy of John Wallis, Mechanica (London, 1669–71).Google Scholar
NQ.16.168. Newton’s copy of Edward Stillingfleet, An answer to several late treatises (London, 1673).Google Scholar
NQ.16.190. Newton’s copy of Jacques Rohault, Physica, ed. and trans. Samuel Clarke, 3rd ed. (London, 1710).Google Scholar
NQ.16.200. Newton’s self-annotated copy of the Principia (1687).Google Scholar
NQ.17.18. Newton’s copy of John Spencer, De legibus Hebraeorum (Cambridge, 1683–4).Google Scholar
NQ.17.21. Newton’s copy of Diogenes Laertius, De vitis dogmatis et apophthegmatis eorum qui in philosophia claruerunt libri X, ed. Ménage, G. (London, 1664).Google Scholar
NQ.18.10. Newton’s copy of Irenaeus, Adversus Valentini, & similium Gnosticorum hæreses … Cum scholiis & annotationibus J. Billii, F. Ducæi, & F. Feu-ardentii (Paris, 1675).Google Scholar
NQ.18.36. Newton’s copy of Vincent Wing, Astronomia Britannica (London, 1669).Google Scholar
Abbadie, Jacques, Réflexions sur la présence réelle du corps de Jesus Christ dans l’Eucharistie (Rotterdam, 1684).Google Scholar
Abbadie, Jacques, Traité de la vérité de la religion chrétienne, 2 parts (Rotterdam, 1684).Google Scholar
Acta eruditorum (1682).Google Scholar
Acta eruditorum (1698).Google Scholar
Acta eruditorum (1714).Google Scholar
Ainsworth, Henry, The art of logick (London, 1657).Google Scholar
d’Alembert, Jean-Baptiste le Rond, Recherches sur la précession des equinoxes (Paris, 1749).Google Scholar
d’Alembert, Jean-Baptiste le Rond, ‘Discours préliminaire’, in Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, 17 vols (Paris, 1751–72), i.Google Scholar
d’Alembert, Jean-Baptiste le Rond, ‘Métaphysique’, in Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, 17 vols (Paris, 1751–72), x.440b.Google Scholar
d’Alembert, Jean-Baptiste le Rond, Traité de dynamique … nouvelle edition (Paris, 1758).Google Scholar
Alexandre, Noël, Apologie des Dominicains missionnaires de la Chine (Cologne, 1699).Google Scholar
Alexandre, Noël, Conformité des ceremonies Chinoises avec l’idolatrie Grecque et Romaine (Cologne, 1700).Google Scholar
Almeloveen, Theodorus Janssonius ab, Opuscula, sive antiquitatum e sacris profanarum specimen (Amsterdam, 1685).Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich, Encyclopaedia septem tomis distincta, 7 vols (Herborn, 1630).Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich, Scientiarum omnium encyclopaedia, 2 vols (Leiden, 1649).Google Scholar
Alting, Jacob, Academicarum dissertationum heptades duae, prior theologicarum, posterior philologicarum (Groningen, 1671).Google Scholar
Amama, Sixtinus, Anti-barbarus Biblicus (Franeker, 1628).Google Scholar
Ames, William, Disputatio theologica adversus metaphysicam (Leiden, 1632).Google Scholar
Ames, William, Opera, 5 vols (Amsterdam, 1658).Google Scholar
Annat, François, De incoacta libertate disputatio quadripartita, qua monstratur, ex doctrina potissimum S. Augustini atque etiam S. Thomae, indifferentiam (Rome, 1652).Google Scholar
Annat, François, Jansenius a thomistis gratiae per seipsam efficacis defensoribus condemnatus (Paris, 1653).Google Scholar
Annat, François, La conduite de l’Eglise et du Roy justifiée dans la condamnation de l’hérésie des Jansénistes … et de la prétenduë conformité de leur doctrine avec celle des Thomistes (Paris, 1664).Google Scholar
[Anon, . ], ‘Lectori’, in Bois, John, Veteris interpretis cum Beza aliisque recentioribus collatio in quatuor evangeliis & apostolorum actis (London, 1655).Google Scholar
[Anon, . ], Some remarks on the letters of the late Lord Bolingbroke, on the study and use of history; so far as they relate to Sacred history (London, 1752).Google Scholar
[Anon, . ], Lettre a l’auteur des avis importans au R. P. recteur des Jésuites du Collège de Paris, ou apologie du P. Bouhours (n.p., n.d.).Google Scholar
Antonio Caprini, Giovanni, Summa triumphantis philosophiae (Rome, 1653).Google Scholar
Antonius, de Carlenis, Four questions on the subalternation of the sciences, ed. and trans. Livesey, S. J. (Philadelphia, 1994).Google Scholar
Argenterio, Giovanni, Varia opera de Re medica (Florence, 1550).Google Scholar
Argenterio, Giovanni, In Artem medicam Galeni, in Opera [1566], 3 vols (Venice, 1592).Google Scholar
d’Argentré, Charles Du Plessis Collectio judiciorum de novis erroribus tomus tertius (Paris, 1736).Google Scholar
Arminius, Jacob, Opera theologica (Leiden, 1629).Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, Apologie pour les Catholiques contre les faussetez & les calomnies d’un livre intitulé La politique du clergé, seconde partie (Liège, 1682).Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, Défense contre la Réponse au livre Des vrayes et fausses idées (Cologne, 1684).Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, Lettres de Monsieur Arnauld, docteur de Sorbonne, au R. P. Mallebranche (n.p., 1685).Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, Réflexions philosophiques et théologiques sur le nouveau système de la nature & de la grâce. Livre 1 (Cologne, 1685).Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, Morale pratique des Jesuites, troisième volume ([Cologne?], 1689).Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, Cinquième dénonciation du philosophisme, c’est a dire de la nouvelle heresie du peché philosophique ([Cologne?], 1690).Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, Morale pratique des Jesuites, tome sixième ([Cologne?], 1692).Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, Œuvres, ed. Du Pac de Bellegarde, G. et al., 43 vols (Paris, 1775–83).Google Scholar
[Arnauld, Antoine and Nicole, Pierre ], La Perpetuité de la foy de l’Eglise catholique touchant l’Eucharistie … Seconde edition (Paris, 1664).Google Scholar
[Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre ] La [Grande] perpétuité de la foi de l’Eglise catholique touchant l’Eucharistie, 3 vols (Paris, 1669–74).Google Scholar
[Arnauld, Antoine and Nicole, Pierre ], La logique ou l’art de penser … cinquiéme edition (Paris, 1683).Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine and Nicole, Pierre, Logic or the art of thinking, ed. Buroker, J. V. (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
Aselli, Gasparo, De lactibus, sive lacteis venis (Leiden, 1627).Google Scholar
Aubertin, Edme, Conformité de la créance de l’Eglise et de S. Augustin sur le sacrament de l’Eucharistie (n.p., 1626).Google Scholar
Aubertin, Edme, L’Eucharistie de l’ancienne Eglise (Geneva, 1633).Google Scholar
Aubertin, Edme, De Eucharistiae sive Coenae dominicae sacramento libri tres (Deventer, 1654).Google Scholar
Audoenus of Rouen, , Vitae Eligii episcopi Noviomagensis liber II, ed. Krusch, B. (Hanover and Leipzig, 1902).Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis, Oeuvres morales et politiques de … François Bacon, trans. Baudoin, Jean (Paris, 1633).Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis, The works of Francis Bacon, ed. Spedding, J., Ellis, R., and Heath, D., 7 vols (London, 1857–61).Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis, The Oxford Francis Bacon (Oxford, 1996–).Google Scholar
Baliani, Giovanni Battista, Opere diverse (Genoa, 1666).Google Scholar
Banier, Antoine, Explication historique des fables, 2 vols (Paris, 1711).Google Scholar
Banier, Antoine, La Mythologie et les fables expliquées par l’histoire, 3 vols (Paris, 1738).Google Scholar
Baro, Peter, Summa trium de praedestinatione sententiarum [1594] (Harderwijk, 1613).Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac, Lectiones geometricae (London, 1670).Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac, Lectiones habitae in scholis publicis Academiae Cantabrigiensis, 2 vols (London, 1683–4).Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac, The theological works, ed. Napier, A., 9 vols (Cambridge, 1859).Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac, Optical lectures, trans. Fay, H. C. (London, 1989).Google Scholar
Barth, Johannes Matthaeus, Physica generalior: oder kurze Sätze von denen natürlichen Körpern (Regensburg, 1724).Google Scholar
Basnage, Jacques, Traité de la conscience (Amsterdam, 1696).Google Scholar
Basnage, Jacques, Histoire des Juifs, depuis Jesus-Christ jusqu’à present, 7 books in 5 vols (Rotterdam, 1706–7).Google Scholar
Basnage, Jacques, The history of the Jews, from Jesus Christ to the present time, trans. Taylor, Thomas (London, 1708).Google Scholar
[Basnage de Beauval, Henri], Lettre d’un intolerant, à un théologien intolerant aussi (‘Irenopolis’, 1690).Google Scholar
Basnage de Beauval, Henri, Contribution à la connaissance des réseaux d’information au début du XVIIIe siècle. Henri Basnage de Beauval et sa correspondance à propos de l’Histoire des Ouvrages des Savans (1687–1709), ed. Bots, H. and van Lieshout, L. (Amsterdam, 1984).Google Scholar
Basson, Sébastien, Philosophia naturalis adversus Aristotelem (Geneva, 1621).Google Scholar
Bathurst, Ralph, ‘Tres quaestiones in Comit. Oxon. 1654’, in Wharton, Thomas, The life and literary remains of Ralph Bathurst, M.D., 2 vols (London, 1761).Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard, More reasons for the Christian religion and no reason against it (London, 1672).Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard, A Christian directory (London, 1673).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (praes.), Theses de fluiditate & firmitate, defended by Philippus Muysson, 20 July 1689. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (praes.), Theses philosophicae de elementis, defended by Antonius de Massanes, 23 August 1690. Amsterdam University Library (CC 560, no. 3).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre, Dictionnaire historique et critique, 1st ed., 4 vols (Rotterdam, 1697).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre, Dictionnaire historique et critique, 2nd ed., 3 vols (Rotterdam, 1702).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre, Dictionnaire historique et critique, 5th ed., 4 vols (Amsterdam, Leiden, The Hague, Utrecht).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre, Œuvres diverses, ed. Labrousse, E., 8 vols (Hildesheim, 1964–82).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre, Correspondance, ed. Labrousse, E. et al., 15 vols (Oxford, 1999–2017).Google Scholar
Beausobre, Isaac de, Histoire critique de Manichée et du Manichéisme, 2 vols (Amsterdam, 1739).Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard, Matter or motion cannot think: or, a confutation of atheism from the faculties of the soul … Being the second of the lecture founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle (London, 1692).Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard, A confutation of atheism from the structure and origin of humane bodies. Part II … Being the fourth of the lecture founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle (London, 1692).Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard, A confutation of atheism from the origin and frame of the world, part II … being the seventh of the lecture founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle (London, 1693).Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard, A dissertation upon the Epistles of Phalaris, with an answer to the objections of the honourable Charles Boyle (London, 1699).Google Scholar
Bergested, Johannes, Dissertatio gradualis De ara Ignoti Dei (Lund, 1744).Google Scholar
Bernard of Luxemburg, , Catalogus haereticorum (Cologne, 1537).Google Scholar
Bernier, François, Suite des memoires du Sr Bernier sur l’Empire du Grand Mogol (Paris, 1671).Google Scholar
Bernier, François, Abrégé de la philosophie de Gassendi, 8 vols (Lyon, 1678).Google Scholar
Bernier, François, Abrégé de la philosophie de Gassendi … seconde edition (7 vols, Lyon, 1684).Google Scholar
[Bernier, François ], Eclaircissement sur le Livre de M. de la Ville, in Recueil de quelques pieces curieuses concernant la philosophie de Monsieur Descartes, ed. Bayle, Pierre (Amsterdam, 1684).Google Scholar
Bernier, François, Traité du libre et du volontaire (Amsterdam, 1685).Google Scholar
Biancani, Giuseppe, ‘Nature of mathematics’, trans. Klima, G. in Mancosu, P., Philosophy of mathematics and mathematical practice in the seventeenth century (Oxford, 1996), 178–212.Google Scholar
Bibliothèque ancienne et moderne, 3 (1715).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque choisie, 7 (1705).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque universelle des sciences, belles-lettres, et arts, 28 (Geneva, 1823).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque universelle et historique, 5 (1687).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque universelle et historique, 7 (1687).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque universelle et historique, 13 (1694).Google Scholar
Birch, Thomas, The history of the Royal Society, 4 vols (London, 1757).Google Scholar
Boate, Gerard, and Boate, Arnold, Philosophia naturalis reformata (Dublin, 1641).Google Scholar
Boerhaave, Herman, Orations, trans. Kegel-Brinkgreve, E., Luyendijk-Elshout, A. M. (Leiden, 1983).Google Scholar
Bolingbroke, Henry St John, Viscount, Letters on the study and use of history, 2 vols (Dublin, 1752).Google Scholar
Borelli, Giovanni Alfonso, De motu animalium, 2 vols (Rome, 1680–1).Google Scholar
Bose, Johann Andreas, Dissertatio philologica de Ara Ignoti Dei (Jena, 1659).Google Scholar
Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne, Premier avertissement aux protestants sur les lettres du ministre Jurieu (Paris, 1689).Google Scholar
Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne, L’antiquité éclaircie sur l’immutabilité de l’Etre divin, & sur l’égalité des trois personnes (Paris, 1691).Google Scholar
Bouju, Théophraste, Corps de toute la philosophie (Paris, 1614).Google Scholar
Boverio, Zacarías, Demonstrationes symbolorum verae, et falsae religionis (Lyon, 1617).Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert, Works, ed. Hunter, M. and Davis, E. B. (London, 1999–2000).Google Scholar
Boysen, Petrus Adolphus (Wolf, Johannes Christopher praeses), Atheismi falso suspectos (Wittenberg, 1710).Google Scholar
Bradwardine, Thomas, De causa Dei, contra Pelagium, ed. Savile, Henry (London, 1618).Google Scholar
Briggs, William, Ophthalmo-graphia, sive oculi ejusque partium descriptio anatomica (London, 1687).Google Scholar
Buddeus, Johannes Franciscus (praes.), Dissertatio philosophica de Spinozismo ante Spinozam (Halle, 1701).Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, Franco, Institutionum logicarum libri duo (Cambridge, 1637).Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, Franco, Institutionum metaphysicarum libri duo (London, 1653).Google Scholar
Burman, Peter, ed., Sylloges epistolarum a viris illustribus scriptarum, 5 vols (Leiden, 1727).Google Scholar
Caballero a Santa Maria, Antonio, Traité sur quelques points importans de la mission de la Chine (Paris, 1701).Google Scholar
Cabeo, Niccolò, In quatuor libros Meteorologicorum Aristotelis commentaria (Rome, 1646).Google Scholar
Calvin, John, De aeterna Dei praedestinatione [1551], trans. Reid, J. K. S. (Cambridge, 1961).Google Scholar
Campbell, Archibald, Enquiry into the original of moral virtue (Edinburgh, 1728–33).Google Scholar
Campbell, Archibald, Oratio de vanitate luminis naturae (Edinburgh, 1733).Google Scholar
Campbell, Archibald, The necessity of revelation, or an enquiry into the extent of human powers with respect to matters of religion (London, 1739).Google Scholar
Cantemir, Dimitrie, Sistemul sau întocmirea religiei Muhammedane [1722] (Bucharest, 1987).Google Scholar
Carbone, Ludovico, Introductio in universam philosophiam (Venice, 1599).Google Scholar
Cardwell, E., ed., Documentary annals of the Reformed Church of England, 2 vols (2nd ed., Oxford, 1844).Google Scholar
[Carroll, William ], Remarks upon Mr. Clarke’s sermons … (London, 1705).Google Scholar
[Carroll, William ], Dissertation upon the tenth chapters of the fourth book of Mr. Locke’s Essay (London, 1706).Google Scholar
[Carroll, William ], The scepticism and fundamental errors establish’d in Samuel Clark’s sermons (London, 1706).Google Scholar
[Carroll, William ], Spinoza reviv’d (London, 1709).Google Scholar
Carroll, William, Spinoza reviv’d. Part the second (London, 1711).Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret, The worlds olio (London, 1655).Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter, The natural history of nutrition, life and voluntary motion (London, 1659).Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter, Oeconomia animalis … editio tertia (London, 1666).Google Scholar
Cheyne, George, Rudimentorum methodi fluxionum inversæ specimina (London, 1705).Google Scholar
Cheyne, George, The philosophical principles of natural religion (London, 1705).Google Scholar
Cheyne, George, The philosophical principles of natural religion … second edition (London, 1715).Google Scholar
Chouet, Jean-Robert, Corsi di filosofia, ed. Sina, M., 2 vols (Florence, 2010).Google Scholar
Churchill, John, A collection of voyages and travels (London, 1704).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, ‘Annotata’, in Jacobi Rohaulti physica (London, 1702).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, A demonstration of the being and attributes of God (London, 1705).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, A discourse concerning the unchangeable obligations of natural religion (London, 1706).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, A letter to Mr Dodwell; wherein all the arguments in his Epistolary Discourse against the immortality of the soul are particularly answered (London, 1706).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, The great duty of universal love and charity. A sermon preached before the Queen, at St James’s chapel. On Sunday December the 30th, 1705 … Publish’d by Her Majesties Special Command (London, 1706).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, A defense of an argument made use of in a letter to Mr Dodwel, to prove the immateriality and natural immortality of the soul (London, 1707).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, A second defense of an argument made use of in a letter to Mr Dodwel, to prove the immateriality and natural immortality of the soul (London, 1707).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, A third defense of an argument made use of in a letter to Mr Dodwel, to prove the immateriality and natural immortality of the soul (London, 1708).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, A fourth defense of an argument made use of in a letter to Mr Dodwel (London, 1708).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, ‘Annotata’, in Jacobi Rohaulti physica …. editio tertia (London, 1710).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, A discourse concerning the being and attributes of God … the third edition corrected (London, 1711).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, The Scripture-doctrine of the Trinity (London, 1712).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, A letter to the Reverend Dr Wells … in answer to his Remarks (London, 1714).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, A reply to the objections of Robert Nelson, Esq; and of an anonymous author, against Dr Clarke’s Scripture-doctrine of the Trinity (London, 1714).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, An answer to the remarks of the author of, Some considerations concerning the Trinity, and the ways of managing the controversy (London, 1714).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, Remarks upon a book entituled, a philosophical enquiry concerning human liberty (London, 1717).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, Sermons, 10 vols (London, 1730).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, The works of Samuel Clarke, 4 vols (London, 1738).Google Scholar
Claude, Jean, Réponse au livre de Mr Arnauld, intitulé La Perpétuité de la foi (Quevilly, 1670).Google Scholar
Claude, Jean, La défense de la Réformation contre le livre intitulé Préjugez légitimes contre les Calvinistes (Rouen, 1673).Google Scholar
Clavius, Christopher, Operum mathematicorum tomus primus (Mainz, 1611).Google Scholar
Clavius, Christopher, ‘Modus quo disciplinae mathematicae in scholis Societatis possent promoveri’, in Monumenta paedagogica Societatis Jesu, ed. Gómez Rodeles, C. (Madrid, 1901).Google Scholar
Clemens Alexandrinus, , Opera Graece et Latine quae exstant (Paris, 1641).Google Scholar
Cocceius, Johannes, Opera anecdota, theologica et philologica, 2 vols (Amsterdam, 1706).Google Scholar
[Cockburne, Robert ?], An historical dissertation on the books of the New Testament (Edinburgh, 1755).Google Scholar
[Collins, Anthony ], A reply to Mr. Clark’s Defence of his Letter to Mr. Dodwell (London, 1707).Google Scholar
[Collins, Anthony ], Reflections on Mr. Clark’s Second Defence of his letter to Mr. Dodwell (London, 1707).Google Scholar
[Collins, Anthony ], An answer to Mr. Clark’s third defence of his letter to Mr. Dodwell (London, 1708).Google Scholar
Collins, Anthony, The correspondence of Anthony Collins, 1676–1729, freethinker, ed. Dybikowski, J. (Paris, 2011).Google Scholar
Commandino, Federico, Archimedis Opera non nulla (Venice, 1558).Google Scholar
Comte, Louis le, Nouveaux mémoires sur l’état présent de la Chine, 2 vols (Paris, 1696).Google Scholar
Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de, Traité des sensations, 2 vols (London, 1754).Google Scholar
Conimbricenses, Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis societatis Iesu, in quatuor libros De coelo (Cologne, 1596).Google Scholar
Conimbricenses, Commentariorum Collegii Conimbricensis Societatis Iesu, in octo libros physicorum Aristotelis, Prima pars (Cologne, 1616).Google Scholar
Conway, Anne, The Conway letters, ed. Nicolson, M. H., revised Hutton, S. (Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar
Couplet, Philippe et al., Confucius Sinarum philosophus, sive Scientia Sinensis Latine exposita (Paris, 1687).Google Scholar
Courcelles, Etienne de, ‘Praefatio’, in M. Simonis Episcopii … Opera theologica, 2 vols (Amsterdam, 1650–65).Google Scholar
Courcelles, Etienne de, Opera theologica (Amsterdam, 1675).Google Scholar
Crell, Johann, De Deo et ejus attributis (n.p., 1631).Google Scholar
Crispo, Giovanni Battista, De ethnicis philosophis caute legendis (Rome, 1594).Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph, The true intellectual system of the universe (London, 1678).Google Scholar
Cunaeus, Petrus, Sardi Venales. Satyra Menippea in huius seculi homines plerosque inepte eruditos (Leiden, 1612).Google Scholar
Cuper, Gisbert, Harpocrates, sive Explicatio imagunculæ argenteæ perantiquæ; quæ in figuram Harpocratis formata representat solem (Utrecht, 1687).Google Scholar
Daillé, Jean (son), ‘Abrégé de la vie de Mr Daillé’, in Les deux derniers sermons de Mr. Daillé (Geneva, 1671).Google Scholar
Daily courant, 4 June 1705.Google Scholar
Daily courant, 24 December 1705.Google Scholar
Dale, Anthonie van, De oraculis ethnicorum (Amsterdam, 1683).Google Scholar
Dalgarno, George, Ars signorum (London, 1661).Google Scholar
Daneau, Lambert, In Petri Lombardi librum primum sententiarum commentarius triplex (Geneva, 1580).Google Scholar
Dapper, Olfert, Description de l’Afrique (Amsterdam, 1686).Google Scholar
Davenant, John, Expositio epistolae D. Pauli ad Colossenses (Cambridge, 1627).Google Scholar
Davenant, John, Determinationes quaestionum quarundam theologicarum … editio secunda (Cambridge, 1639).Google Scholar
Davenant, John, Animadversions upon a treatise intitled, Gods love to mankind (London, 1641).Google Scholar
Davenant, John, Dissertationes duæ … in Academia Cantabrigiensi professore theologico auditoribus dictatae (Cambridge, 1650).Google Scholar
Denis the Carthusian, , Opera omnia, ed. Leone, M., 42 vols (Montreuil-sur-Mer, 1896–1935).Google Scholar
Denzinger, H., ed., Enchiridion symbolorum, 35th ed. (Freiburg, 1973).Google Scholar
Derodon, David, Philosophica contracta, 3 vols (Geneva, 1664).Google Scholar
Des Maizeaux, Pierre, Recueil de diverses pieces, sur la philosophie, la religion naturelle, l’histoire, les mathematiques &c., 2 vols (Amsterdam, 1720).Google Scholar
Descartes, René, Oeuvres de Descartes, ed. Adam, C. and Tannery, P., 11 vols (Paris, 1964–71).Google Scholar
Descartes, René, Principles of philosophy, ed. and trans. Miller, V. R. and Miller, R. P. (Dordrecht, 1983).Google Scholar
Descartes, René, The philosophical writings, trans. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D., Kenny, A., 3 vols (Cambridge, 1984–91).Google Scholar
Descartes, René, Lettres, ed. Armogathe, J.-R. and Belgioioso, G., 3 vols (Lecce, 2005).Google Scholar
Desgabets, Robert, Discours de la communication ou transfusion du sang (Paris, 1668).Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis et al., Encyclopédie ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, 28 vols (1751–78).Google Scholar
Dodwell, Henry, Two letters of advice, I. For the susception of Holy Orders. II. For studies theological, especially such as are rational (Dublin, 1672).Google Scholar
Dodwell, Henry, An epistolary discourse, proving from the Scriptures and the first Fathers, that the soul is a principle naturally mortal (London, 1706).Google Scholar
Du Châtelet, Émilie, Institutions de physique (Paris, 1740).Google Scholar
Du Hamel, Jean-Baptiste, De consensu veteris et novae philosophiae libri duo (Paris, 1663).Google Scholar
Du Hamel, Jean-Baptiste, Philosophia vetus et nova ad usum scholae accommodata … editio tertia, 2 vols (Paris, 1684).Google Scholar
Du Moulin, Pierre, Anatome Arminianismi, seu enucleatio controversiarum quae in Belgio agitantur, super doctrina de providentia: de praedestinatione, de morte Christi, de natura & gratia (Leiden, 1619).Google Scholar
Du Pin, Louis Ellies, Nouvelle Bibliothèque des auteurs Ecclesiastiques … tome XVII (Amsterdam, 1711).Google Scholar
Edwards, John, Some brief critical remarks on Dr. Clarke’s last papers (London, 1714).Google Scholar
Elie, Benoist, Histoire de l’edit de Nantes, 5 parts in 3 vols (Delft, 1693–5).Google Scholar
Emes, Thomas, Vindiciae mentis (London, 1702).Google Scholar
Ent, George, Apologia pro circulatione sanguinis (London, 1641).Google Scholar
[Episcopius, Simon ], Apologia pro Confessione sive declaratione sententiae eorum qui in Foederato Belgio vocantur Remonstrantes ([Amsterdam], 1629).Google Scholar
Episcopius, Simon, Opera theologica, ed. Curcellaeus, Stephanus (Amsterdam, 1650–65).Google Scholar
Psychalethes, Estibius [= Coward, William ], Second thoughts concerning [the] human soul (London, 1702).Google Scholar
Eustachius a Sancto Paulo, , Summa philosophiae quadripartita, de rebus Dialecticis, Ethicis, Physicis, & Metaphysicis (Paris, 1609).Google Scholar
Fabretti, Raffaello, Inscriptionum antiquarum … explicatio et additamentum (Rome, 1699).Google Scholar
Fabricius, Franciscus, Dissertatio theologico-philologica, de ara ignoti Dei (Leiden, 1713).Google Scholar
Fabricius, Hieronymus, De brutorum loquela (Padua, 1603).Google Scholar
Fabricius, Johannes Ludovicus, ΔΙΆΛΕΞΙΣ De limitibus obsequii erga homines, editio secunda (Heidelberg, 1682).Google Scholar
Fernández Navarrete, Domingo, Tratados historicos, politicos, ethicos, y religiosos de la Monarchia de China (Madrid, 1676).Google Scholar
Flamsteed, John, The correspondence, ed. Forbes, E. G., Murdin, L., and Willmoth, F., 3 vols (Bristol, 1993).Google Scholar
Flier, A. van der, Specimen historico-theologicum de Johanne Coccejo anti-scholastico (Utrecht, 1859).Google Scholar
Fonseca, Pedro da, Commentariorum Petri Fonsecae … in Metaphysicorum Aristotelis Stagiritae libros, 3 vols (Cologne, 1599–1604).Google Scholar
Formey, Johann Heinrich Samuel, Souvenirs d’un citoyen, 2 vols (Paris, 1789).Google Scholar
Fortin de La Hoguette, Philippe, Testament ou conseils fidelles d’un bon Pere à ses Enfans … seconde edition (Paris, 1648).Google Scholar
Fotherby, Martin, Atheomastix clearing foure truthes, against atheists and infidels (London, 1622).Google Scholar
Fracastoro, Girolamo, Turrius sive de intellectione, in Opera omnia (Venice, 1555).Google Scholar
Fracastoro, Girolamo, De contagione et contagiosis morbis et eorum curatione libri III, ed. Wright, W. C. (New York, 1930).Google Scholar
Franzius, Wolfgang, Tractatus theologicus novus & perspicuus, de interpretatione sacrarum Scripturarum maxime legitima (Wittenberg, 1619).Google Scholar
Fréret, Nicolas, Œuvres complètes, 20 vols (Paris, 1796).Google Scholar
Fuller, M., ed., The life, letters, and writings of John Davenant, D.D. (London, 1897).Google Scholar
Gale, Theophilus, The court of the gentiles (London, 1669–77).Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, Le opere, ed. Favaro, A., 20 vols (Florence, 1890–1909).Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo, Two new sciences, ed. and trans. Drake, S. (Madison, 1974).Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre, Animadversiones in decimum librum Diogenes Laertii, 3 pts in 2 vols (Lyon, 1649).Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre, Opera omnia, 6 vols (Lyon, 1658).Google Scholar
Gaussen, Etienne, Quatuor dissertationes theologicae. I. De ratione studii Theologici. II. De natura Theologiae. III. De ratione Concionandi. IV. De utilitate Philosophiae ad Theologiam (Saumur, 1670).Google Scholar
Gauthier, Joseph, Refutation du Celse moderne, ou Objections contre le Christianisme avec des responses (Lunéville, 1752).Google Scholar
Gaza, Theodorus, ‘In libros de animalibus praefatio’, Aristotelis Stagiritae operum, tomus secundus [1476] (Leiden, 1549).Google Scholar
Gillespie, George, ‘A treatise of miscellany questions’, in The works of Mr. George Gillespie, 2 vols (Edinburgh, 1846).Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph, The vanity of dogmatizing (London, 1661).Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph, Essays on several important subjects in philosophy and religion (London, 1676).Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph, Saducismus triumphatus (London, 1680).Google Scholar
Goclenius, Rodolph, Lexicon philosophicum (1613).Google Scholar
Goodall, Christopher, The Colledge of Physicians vindicated (London, 1676).Google Scholar
Gorlaeus, David, Exercitationes philosophicae (Leiden, 1620).Google Scholar
[Goulart, Simon ], ‘Sommaire, De la Superstition’ [1582], in Les oeuvres morales et meslées de Plutarque, trans. Amyot, Jacques, ed. Goulart, Simon (Geneva, 1627).Google Scholar
Graevius, Johannes, Oratio de cometis, contra vulgi opinionem cometas esse malorum nuncios (Utrecht, 1665).Google Scholar
Gravesande, Willem ’s, Physices elementa mathematica (Leiden, 1721).Google Scholar
Gravesande, Willem ’s, Orationes duae (Leiden, 1731).Google Scholar
Gravesande, Willem ’s, Introductio ad philosophiam, metaphysicam et logicam (Leiden, 1736).Google Scholar
Gravesande, Willem ’s, Mathematical elements of natural philosophy confirmed by experiments, or, an introduction to Sir Isaac Newton’s philosophy, trans. Desaguliers, J. T., 2 vols (London, 1747).Google Scholar
Gregory, David, Catoptricae et dioptricae sphaericae elementa (Oxford, 1695).Google Scholar
Gregory, David, Astronomiae physicae & geometricae elementa (Oxford, 1702).Google Scholar
Gregory, James, Theses [no title] (Edinburgh, 1690) [Wing G1911].Google Scholar
Gren, Friedrich Albrecht Carl, Grundriss der Naturlehre (Halle, 1797).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, De jure belli ac pacis (Paris, 1625).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, De veritate religionis Christianae, editio nova, additis annotationibus (Leiden, 1640).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, De jure belli et pacis … editio nova cum annotationes auctoris (Amsterdam, 1660).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, De jure bellis ac pacis … editio nova (Jena, 1673).Google Scholar
Grube, Godofredus Fridericus, Disputatio philologica posterior ex Act. XVII. 23. de ara ignoti dei (Königsberg, 1712).Google Scholar
Guiffart, Pierre, Discours du vuide, sur les experiences de monsieur Paschal, et le traicté de Mr Pierius (Paris, 1647).Google Scholar
Hales, John, Golden remains (London, 1659).Google Scholar
Halley, Edmond, ‘A discourse concerning gravity, and its properties’, Philosophical Transactions, 16 (1686), 3–21.Google Scholar
Hammond, Henry, Paraphrase and annotations upon all the books of the New Testament (London, 1653).Google Scholar
Hammond, Henry, Ἀξια Θεου κρισις. Judgment worthy of God. Or an assertion of the existence and duration of hell torments (Oxford, 1665).Google Scholar
Harrison, John, The library of Isaac Newton (Cambridge, 1978).Google Scholar
Harvey, Gideon, Archelogia philosophica nova (London, 1663).Google Scholar
Harvey, William, Exercitationes duae anatomicae de circulatione sanguinis (Rotterdam, 1649).Google Scholar
Haworth, Samuel, Anthropologia, or, A philosophic discourse concerning man being the anatomy both of his soul and body (London, 1680).Google Scholar
Heereboord, Adrian, ΕΡΜΗΝΕΙΑ logica: sive synopseos logicae Burgersdicianae (London, 1651).Google Scholar
Heereboord, Adriaan, Meletemata philosophica (Leiden, 1654)Google Scholar
Heereboord, Adrian, Meletemata philosophica (Amsterdam and London, 1680).Google Scholar
Heidanus, Abraham, Consideratien, over eenige saecken onlangs voorgevallen in de Universiteyt binnen Leyden (Leiden, 1676).Google Scholar
Heidanus, Abraham, Considerationes ad res quasdam nuper gestas in Academia Lugduno-Batava (Hamburg, 1678).Google Scholar
Heinsius, Daniel, ‘Notae et emendationes ad Maximum philosophum’, in Maximi Tyrii dissertationes philosophicae (Leiden, 1614).Google Scholar
Hennebel, Joannes Libertus, Thesis VII historico-theologica contra duos libellos Erasmi Pilii (Louvain, 1688).Google Scholar
Herbert, Edward, De veritate prout distinguitur revelatione, a verisimili, a possibili, et a falso (London, 1645).Google Scholar
Herbert, Edward, De religione gentilium, errorumque apud eos causis (Amsterdam, 1663).Google Scholar
Herbert, Thomas, Some yeares travels into divers parts of Asia and Afrique … revised and enlarged (London, 1638).Google Scholar
Highmore, Nathaniel, The history of generation (London, 1651).Google Scholar
Hill, Abraham, ‘Some account of the life of Dr. Isaac Barrow’, in The theological works of Isaac Barrow, ed. Napier, A., 9 vols (Cambridge, 1859), i.Google Scholar
Histoire des ouvrages des sçavans (September 1687).Google Scholar
Histoire des ouvrages des sçavans (May 1692).Google Scholar
Hoadly, Benjamin, ‘The Preface, giving some account of the life, writings, and character of the author’, in Clarke, Samuel, Sermons, 10 vols (London, 1730), i, ii–xxiii.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Elementorum philosophia sectio prima de corpore (London, 1655).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Six lessons to the professors of mathematiques (London, 1656).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Elementorum philosophiae sectio secunda, De homine (London, 1658).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, An answer to a book published by Dr Bramhall … called the Catching of the Leviathan (London, 1682).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Seven philosophical problems and two propositions of geometry (London, 1682).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Opera philosophica quae Latine scripsit omnia, ed. Molesworth, W., 5 vols (London, 1839–45).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Critique du De Mundo de Thomas White, ed. Jacquot, J. and Jones, H. W. (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Malcolm, N., 3 vols (Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, An attempt for the explication of the phaenomena observable in an experiment published by the Honourable Robert Boyle (London, 1661).Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, An attempt to prove the motion of the earth from observations (London, 1674).Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, Lampas, or, descriptions of some mechanical improvements of lamps & waterpoises (London, 1677).Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, Lectures de potentia restitutiva (London, 1678).Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, Posthumous works (London, 1705).Google Scholar
Horn, Georg, Historiae philosophicae libri septem (Leiden, 1655).Google Scholar
Huet, Pierre-Daniel, Censura philosophiae Cartesianae (Paris, 1689).Google Scholar
[Huet, Pierre-Daniel], Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire du cartesianisme (Utrecht, 1692).Google Scholar
Huet, Pierre-Daniel, Commentarius de rebus ad eum pertinentibus (The Hague, 1718).Google Scholar
Huet, Pierre-Daniel, Against Cartesian philosophy, trans. Lennon, T. M. (Amherst, 2003).Google Scholar
Hume, David, The natural history of religion [1757], ed. Beauchamp, T. L. (Oxford, 2007).Google Scholar
Hurtado de Mendoza, Pedro, Universa philosophia … nova editio (Lyon, 1624).Google Scholar
Huygens, Christiaan, Traité de la lumière … avec un Discours de la cause de la pesanteur (Leiden, 1690).Google Scholar
Huygens, Christiaan, Cosmotheoros (1698).Google Scholar
Huygens, Christiaan, Œuvres complètes, 22 vols (The Hague, 1888–1950).Google Scholar
Huygens, Constantijn, De briefwisseling van Huygens, ed. Worp, J. A., 6 vols (The Hague, 1911–17).Google Scholar
Jacquelot, Isaac, Dissertations sur l’existence de Dieu, où l’on démontre cette vérité par l’histoire universelle (The Hague, 1697).Google Scholar
Jacquelot, Isaac, Conformité de la foi avec la raison (Amsterdam, 1705).Google Scholar
Jacquelot, Isaac, Examen de la theologie de Mr. Bayle (Amsterdam, 1706).Google Scholar
Jansen, Cornelius, Augustinus, seu Doctrina S. Augustini de humanae naturae sanitate, aegritudine, medicina, adversus Pelagianos et Massilienses, 3 vols (Louvain, 1640).Google Scholar
Journal des sçavans (April 1684).Google Scholar
Junius, Franciscus, Opera theologica, 2 vols (Geneva, 1613).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, La politique du clergé de France (The Hague, 1681).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, Examen de l’Eucharistie de l’Eglise Romaine (Rotterdam, 1682).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, Histoire du Calvinisme & celle du Papisme mises en parallele, 4 vols (Rotterdam, 1683).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, L’esprit de Mr. Arnauld (Deventer, 1684).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, Jugement sur les methodes rigides et relachées d’expliquer la providence et la grace (Rotterdam, 1686).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, Des droits des deux souverains en matière de religion (Rotterdam, 1687).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, Traité de la nature et de la Grace, ou du concours générale de la providence & du concours particulier de la Grace efficace (Utrecht, 1687).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, Le tableau du Socinianisme (The Hague, 1690).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, Apologie du Sr. Jurieu, pasteur & professeur en theologie (The Hague, 1691).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, Seconde apologie (Utrecht, 1692).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, Défense de la doctrine universelle de l’église, et particulierement de Calvin et des Reformez, sur le principe et le fondement de la foy (Rotterdam, 1695).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, La religion du latitudinaire, avec apologie pour la Sainte Trinité, appellée l’heresie des trois Dieux (Rotterdam, 1696).Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre, Histoire critique des dogmes et des cultes (1704).Google Scholar
Justi, Johann Heinrich Gottlob von, ‘Untersuchung der Lehre von den Monaden und einfachen Dingen’, Dissertation qui a remporté le prix proposé par l’Academie Royale … sur le systeme des monades (Berlin, 1748), iii–lii.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Gesammelte Schriften (Berlin, 1900–).Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomäus, Opera omnia, 2 vols (Geneva, 1614).Google Scholar
Keill, John, An examination of Dr. Burnet’s theory of the earth together with some remarks on Mr. Whiston’s New theory of the earth (Oxford, 1698).Google Scholar
Keill, John, Introductio ad veram physicam. Seu lectiones physicæ. Habitæ in schola naturalis philosophiæ Academiæ Oxoniensis (Oxford, 1702).Google Scholar
Keill, John, Introductio ad veram physicam: seu lectiones physicae … editio secunda emendatior & auctior (Oxford, 1705).Google Scholar
Keill, John, ‘Epistola ad Cl. Virum Gulielmum Cockburn, Medicinae Doctorem. In qua leges attractionis aliaque Physices principia traduntur’, Philosophical Transactions, 26 (1708), 97–110.Google Scholar
Keill, John, ‘Epistola ad clarissimum virum Edmundum Halleium Geometriae Professorem Savilianum, de legibus virium centripetarum’, Philosophical Transactions, 26 (1708–9), 174–88.Google Scholar
Keill, John, Introductio ad veram astronomiam, seu lectiones astronomicae habitae in Schola Astronomica Academiae Oxoniensis (Oxford, 1718).Google Scholar
Köber, Johann Friedrich, Dissertatiuncula De ara ignoti Dei apud Athenienses (Gera, 1683).Google Scholar
Korholt, Christian, De religione ethnica, Muhammedana, et Judaica (Kiel, 1666).Google Scholar
’l-Faraj, Abū, Al-Mukhtaṣar fi’l-duwal: supplementum historiae dynastiarum (Oxford, 1663).Google Scholar
La Forge, Louis de, Traité de l’esprit de l’homme, de ses facultez et fonctions, et de son union avec le corps, suivant les principes de René Descartes (Paris, 1666).Google Scholar
[La Lane, Noël de ], De la grâce victorieuse de Jésus-Christ, ou Molina et ses disciples convaincus de l’erreur des pélagiens et des semipélagiens (Paris, 1651).Google Scholar
[La Lane, Noël de ], Conformité de Jansénius avec les Thomistes sur le sujet des cinq Propositions contre le P. Ferrier, Jésuite (n.p., 1668).Google Scholar
Laet, Johannes de, Novus orbis seu descriptionis Indiae Occidentalis (Amsterdam, 1633).Google Scholar
Lamy, Bernard, Entretiens sur les sciences … seconde édition (Lyon, 1694).Google Scholar
[Le Cène, Charles ], De l’état de l’homme après le péché et de sa predestination au salut (Amsterdam, 1684).Google Scholar
[Le Cène, Charles and Le Clerc, Jean ], Entretiens sur diverses matières de théologie (Amsterdam, 1685).Google Scholar
[Le Clerc, Jean ], Liberii de Sancto Amore Epistolae theologicae, in quibus varii scholasticorum errores castigantur (Irenopolis [= Saumur], 1679 [= 1681]).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Logica, sive ars ratiocinandi (Amsterdam, 1692).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Physica, sive de rebus corporeis libri quinque (Amsterdam, 1696).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Ars critica, 2 vols (Amsterdam, 1697).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Ars critica, 2nd ed. (London, 1698).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Parrhasiana ou Pensées diverses sur des matiéres de critique, d’histoire, de morale et de politique (Amsterdam, 1699).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Appendix Augustiniana (‘Antwerp’ [= Amsterdam], 1703).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Logica, ontologia, et pneumatologia … editio quarta (Cambridge, 1704).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Opera philosophica (Amsterdam, 1704).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, ‘Les Œuvres de Mr. Tillotson’, Bibliothèque choisie, 7 (1705).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, ‘Défense de la Bonté et de la Sainteté divine, contre les objections de Mr. Bayle’, Bibliothèque choisie, 9 (1706).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, ‘Remarques sur la Réponse pour Mr. Bayle au sujet du III. & X. Article de la Bibliothèque Choisie’, Bibliothèque choisie, 10 (1706).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, ‘Remarques sur les Entretiens postumes de Mr. Bayle’, Bibliothèque choisie, 12 (1707).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Historia Ecclesiastica duorum primorum a Christo Nato saeculorum (Amsterdam, 1716).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Epistolario, ed. Sina, M., 4 vols (Florence, 1987–97).Google Scholar
Le Fèvre, Tanneguy, Epistolae. Pars altera (Saumur, 1665).Google Scholar
Le Fèvre, Tanneguy, ‘Preface’, in Plutarch, , Traitté de la superstition (Saumur, 1666).Google Scholar
Le Fèvre, Tanneguy, ‘Notulae’, in Quinti Horatii Flacci opera, ed. Le Fèvre, Tanneguy (Saumur, 1671).Google Scholar
Le Gallois, Pierre, Conversations tirées de l’Academie de Monsieur l’Abbé Bourdelot (Paris, 1672).Google Scholar
Le Gobien, Charles, Histoire de l’édit de l’empereur de la Chine, en faveur de la Religion Chrestienne (Paris, 1698).Google Scholar
Le Gobien, Charles, Histoire des Isles Marianes, nouvellement converties à la Religion Chrestienne (Paris, 1700).Google Scholar
Le Grand, Antoine, Institutio philosophiae secundum principia D. Renati Descartes … editio tertia (London, 1675).Google Scholar
[Lebrun, Pierre and Picart, Bernard ], Superstitions anciennes et modernes (Amsterdam, 1733).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Animadversiones ad Cartesii principia philosophiae, ed. Guhrauer, G. E. (Bonn, 1844).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Wolf, ed. Gerhardt, C. J. (Halle, 1860).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Briefwechsel mit Mathematikern, ed. Gerhardt, C. J. (Berlin, 1899).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe (Berlin, 1923–).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Correspondenz von Leibniz mit Caroline, ed. Klopp, O. (Hildesheim, 1973).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Marginalia in Newtoni Principia Mathematica, ed. Fellmann, E. A. (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Mathematische Schriften, 7 vols (Hildesheim, 1971–2004).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Philosophische Schriften, 5 vols (Darmstadt, 1985–92).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. and Clarke, Samuel, The Leibniz–Clarke correspondence, ed. Alexander, H. G. (Manchester, 1956).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. and Hartsoeker, Nicolaas, ‘Philosophical letters’, Memoirs of Literature, 2 (5 May 1712), 137–43.Google Scholar
Leland, John, Reflections on the late Lord Bolingbroke’s letters on the study and use of history (London, 1753).Google Scholar
Les epitres de S. Paul (Mons, 1667).Google Scholar
Lescalopier, Pierre, Humanitas theologica, in qua M. T. Cicero De natura deorum argumentis, expositionibus, illustrationibus nunc primum insignis in lucem prodit (Paris, 1660).Google Scholar
Leuvenhook, Antonie van, ‘Part of a letter from Mr. Leuvenhook … concerning the animalcula in semine humano’, Philosophical Transactions, 21 (1699).Google Scholar
Libavius, Andreas, Alchymia triumphans. De iniusta in se Collegii Galenici spurii in Academia Parisiensi censura (Frankfurt, 1607).Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, Georg Christoph, Briefe, ed. Leitzmann, A. and Schüddekopf, C., 3 vols (Leipzig, 1901–4).Google Scholar
Limborch, Philipp van, Theologia Christiana (Amsterdam, 1686).Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus, Physiologiae Stoicorum libri tres [1604] (Antwerp, 1610).Google Scholar
Livre synodal contenant les articles résolus au Synode des Eglises wallonnes des Provinces Unies des Pays-Bas … de l’année 1692 (n.p., 1692).Google Scholar
Locke, John, Some thoughts concerning education (London, 1693).Google Scholar
Locke, John, Mr. Locke’s reply to the right reverend the Lord Bishop of Worcester’s answer to his second letter (London, 1699).Google Scholar
Locke, John, An essay concerning humane understanding … the fourth edition, with large additions (London, 1700).Google Scholar
Locke, John, An essay concerning humane understanding … the fifth edition, with large additions (London, 1706).Google Scholar
Locke, John, A collection of several pieces of Mr. John Locke, ed. Des Maizeaux, Pierre (London, 1720).Google Scholar
Locke, John, Essai philosophique concernant l’entendement humain, trans. Coste, P. (3rd ed., Amsterdam, 1735).Google Scholar
Locke, John, An essay concerning humane understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H. (Oxford, 1975).Google Scholar
Longobardo, Nicolò, Traité sur quelques points de la religion des Chinois (Paris, 1701).Google Scholar
Luther, Martin, D. Martin Luthers Werke (Weimar, 1883–1993).Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò, Tutte le opere, ed. Martelli, M. (Florence, 1971).Google Scholar
Maclaurin, Colin, An account of Sir Isaac Newton’s philosophical discoveries (London, 1748).Google Scholar
Maignan, Emmanuel, Cursus philosophicus concinnatus ex notissimis cuique principiis, ac praesertim quoad res physicas instauratus ex lege naturae sensatis experimentis passim comprobata (Lyon, 1673).Google Scholar
Maigrot, Charles and Charmot, Nicolas, Historia cultus Sinensium (Cologne, 1700).Google Scholar
Maimbourg, Louis, Histoire du Calvinisme (Paris, 1682).Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas, Œuvres complètes, ed. Robinet, A., 22 vols (Paris, 1958–84).Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas, Dialogues on metaphysics and religion, ed. Jolley, N. (Cambridge, 1997).Google Scholar
Malpighi, Marcello, De viscerum structura exercitatio anatomica (Amsterdam, 1669).Google Scholar
Malpighi, Marcello, Anatome plantarum (London, 1675).Google Scholar
Maresius, Samuel, Hydra Socinianismi expugnata, 3 vols (1651–62).Google Scholar
Marini, Giovanni Filippo de, Historia et relatione del Tunchino e del Giappone (Rome, 1665).Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre-Louis Moreau, ‘Les loix du mouvement et du repos déduites d’un principe métaphysique’ [1746], Histoire de l’Académie des sciences et belles lettres de Berlin (1748), 267–94.Google Scholar
Mazzoni, Jacopo, In universam Platonis, et Aristotelis philosophiam praeludia (Venice, 1597).Google Scholar
Mede, Joseph, Works, ed. Worthington, J., 2 vols (Cambridge, 1664).Google Scholar
Meldrum, George, Theses philosophicae (Aberdeen, 1659).Google Scholar
Memoirs of Literature, 2 (1712).Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin, Quaestiones celeberrimae in Genesim (Paris, 1623).Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin, La vérité des sciences contre les septiques ou Pyrrhoniens (Paris, 1625).Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin, Les questions théologiques, physiques, morales et mathématiques (Paris, 1634).Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin, L’optique et la catoptrique, in La perspective curieuse de R. P. Niceron … avec l’optique et la catoptrique du R. P. Mersenne, ed. de Roberval, G. P. (Paris, 1682).Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin, Correspondance, ed. Tannery, P., 17 vols (1945–88).Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin, L’usage de la raison [1623], ed. Buccolini, C. (Paris, 2002).Google Scholar
Meursius, Johannes, Piraeus sive de Piraeo, Atheniensium portu celeberrimo, et ejusdem Antiquitatibus, liber singularis (Utrecht, 1687).Google Scholar
Meyer, Lodweijk, Philosophia S. Scripturae interpres: exercitatio paradoxa ([Amsterdam], 1666).Google Scholar
Meynard, T., The Jesuit reading of Confucius: the first complete translation of the Lunyu (1687) published in the West (Leiden, 2015).Google Scholar
Missions étrangères, Protestation de Messieurs des missions étrangères sur trois nouveaux libelles anonymes que les Jésuites répandent partout ([Paris], 1709).Google Scholar
Moletti, Giuseppe, The unfinished mechanics of Giuseppe Moletti: an edition and English translation of his Dialogue on Mechanics, 1576, ed. and trans. Laird, W. R. (Toronto, 2000).Google Scholar
Molina, Luis de, On divine foreknowledge: part IV of the Concordia, trans. Freddoso, A. (Ithaca, NY, 1988).Google Scholar
Monantheuil, Henri de, Aristotelis mechanica, Graeca emendata, Latina facta et commentariis illustrata (Paris, 1599).Google Scholar
Montagu, Richard, Appello Caesarem (London, 1625).Google Scholar
Montfaucon, Bernard de, L’antiquité expliquée et représentée en figures, 15 vols (Paris, 1719–24).Google Scholar
More, Henry, The immortality of the soul (London, 1659).Google Scholar
More, Henry, Divine dialogues containing sundry disquisitions & instructions concerning the attributes and providence of God (London, 1668).Google Scholar
More, Henry, Enchiridion metaphysicum, sive de rebus incorporeis succincta & luculenta dissertatio (Cambridge, 1671).Google Scholar
More, Henry, Opera omnia, tum quae Latine, tum quae Anglice scripta sunt, 2 vols (London, 1679).Google Scholar
More, Henry, Opera philosophica (London, 1679).Google Scholar
More, Henry, Manual of metaphysics, trans. Jacob, A., 2 vols (Zurich, 1995).Google Scholar
Mornay, Philippe de, De la verité de la religion Chrestienne (Paris, 1585).Google Scholar
Muret, Marc-Antoine, ‘In Titi Flavium Clementis Alexandrini Protrepricum collectanea ex variis doctorum virorum lectionibus, commentariis, adversariisque decerpta’, in Κλημέντος Αλεξανδρέως τα ευρισκόμενα; Clementi Alexandrini opera (Paris, 1629).Google Scholar
Muret, Marc-Antoine, Variarum lectionum libri xv [1558] (Leiden, 1789).Google Scholar
Musnier, François, ‘Sentiment du Professeur de Dijon sur sa These du peché philosophique’, in Sentimens des Jesuites sur le peché philosophique (Paris, 1694).Google Scholar
Musschenbroek, Pieter van, Elementa physicae, conscripta in usus academicos (Leiden, 1734).Google Scholar
Musschenbroek, Pieter van, The elements of natural philosophy, 2 vols (London, 1744).Google Scholar
Mydorge, Claude, Examen du livre des recréations mathématiques: et de ses problèmes en geometrie, mechanique, optique, & catoptrique (Paris, 1639).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, ‘An accompt of a New Catadioptrical Telescope’, Philosophical Transactions, 81 (March 1672), 4004–7.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Opticks: or a treatise of the reflexions, refractions, inflexions and colours of light (London, 1704).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Optice: sive de reflexionibus, refractionibus, inflexionibus & coloribus lucis libri tres (London, 1706).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Principia, 2nd ed. (London, 1713).Google Scholar
[Newton, Isaac ], ‘An account of the book entituled Commercium Epistolicum Collinii et aliorum, de analysi promota’, Philosophical Transactions, 342 (1715), 173–224.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, ‘Hypothesis explaining the properties of light’, in Birch, Thomas, The history of the Royal Society, 4 vols (London, 1757), iii.247–305.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Correspondence of Sir Isaac Newton and Professor Cotes, ed. Edlestone, J. (London, 1850).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Opticks (New York, 1952).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Correspondence, ed. Turnbull, H. W., 7 vols (Cambridge, 1959–77).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Unpublished scientific papers, ed. Hall, A. R. and Hall, M. B. (Cambridge, 1962).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, The mathematical papers of Isaac Newton, ed. Whiteside, D. T., 8 vols (Cambridge, 1967–81).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Isaac Newton’s theory of the moon’s motion [1702], ed. Cohen, I. B. (Folkestone, 1975).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Certain philosophical questions: Newton’s Trinity notebook, ed. McGuire, J. E. and Tamny, M. (Cambridge, 1983).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, The optical papers of Isaac Newton, vol. 1: The optical lectures, 1670–1672, ed. Shapiro, A. E. (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, ‘Out of Cudworth’, in Essays on the context, nature, and influence of Isaac Newton’s theology, ed. Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1990), 207–13.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, The Principia, ed. and trans. Cohen, I. B., Whitman, A. and Budenz, J. (Cambridge, MA, 1999).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Historia ecclesiastica (de origine schismatico ecclesiae papisticae bicornis): edición crítica, traducción y estudio, ed. and trans. Toribio Pérez, P. (Madrid, 2013).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Philosophical works, ed. Janiak, A., 2nd ed. (Cambridge, 2014).Google Scholar
Nicolai, Johann, Demonstratio qua probatur gentilium theologiam, (ceu tenebras) Deos, Sacrificia ex fonte Scripturae (ceu luce) originem traxisse (Helmstedt, 1681).Google Scholar
Nicole, Pierre, Les Prétendus Réformez convaincus de schisme (Paris, 1684).Google Scholar
Nicole, Pierre, Essais de morale (Paris, 1730–5).Google Scholar
Nizolio, Mario, De veris principiis et vera ratione philosophandi contra pseudophilosophos [1553], ed. Leibniz, G. W. (Frankfurt, 1670).Google Scholar
Nobili, Roberto de, Preaching wisdom to the wise, ed. and trans. Amaladass, A. and Clooney, F. X. (St Louis, 2000).Google Scholar
Nouvelles de la République des Lettres (February 1706).Google Scholar
Oldenburg, Henry, The correspondence, ed. Hall, A. R. and Hall, M. B., 13 vols (Madison, 1965–86).Google Scholar
Orasius Tubero, [= de La Mothe Le Vayer, François], Quatre … dialogues … faits comme les precedents à l’imitation des anciens (Frankfurt, 1606 [really Mons, 1671]).Google Scholar
Origen, , Origenes in Sacras Scripturas commentaria, ed. Huet, Pierre-Daniel, 2 vols (Rouen, 1668).Google Scholar
Papin, Isaac, Essais de théologie sur la providence & la grace (Frankfurt, 1687).Google Scholar
[Pardies, Ignace-Gaston ], Discours du mouvement local (Paris, 1670).Google Scholar
Parker, Samuel, Tentamina physico-theologica de Deo (Oxford, 1665).Google Scholar
Parker, Samuel, An account of the nature and extent of the divine dominion & goodnesse (Oxford, 1666).Google Scholar
Parker, Samuel, Disputationes de Deo (London, 1678).Google Scholar
Patrick, Simon, A brief account of the new sect of latitude-men together with some reflections upon the new philosophy (London, 1662).Google Scholar
Pearson, John, ‘A Preface to the ensuing Paraphrastical Exposition’, in Stokes, David, A paraphrasticall explication of the twelve minor prophets (London, 1659).Google Scholar
Pearson, John, An exposition of the Creed … the fourth edition, revised and now more enlarged (London, 1676).Google Scholar
Pearson, John, ‘Oratio I. Inauguralis’ [1661], in The minor theological works of John Pearson, ed. Churton, E., 2 vols (Oxford, 1844).Google Scholar
Peiresc, Nicolas-Claude Fabri de, Lettres de Peiresc, ed. Tamizey de Larroque, P., 7 vols (Paris, 1888–98).Google Scholar
Pemble, William, De formarum origine (London, 1629).Google Scholar
Pereira, Benito, De communibus omnium rerum naturalium principiis & affectionibus (Lyon, 1588).Google Scholar
Perizonius, Antonius (praes.), Disputatio theologica, qua de praecipuo docendi et disputandi modo agitur (Deventer, 1665).Google Scholar
Perizonius, Antonius, De ratione studii theologici tractatus ad eius emendationem praecipue spectans (Deventer, 1669).Google Scholar
Persius, , Auli Persii Flacci Satirarum liber. Isaacus Casaubonus recensuit, & commentario libro illustravit. Tertia editio (London, 1647).Google Scholar
Petau, Denis, De libero arbitrio (Paris, 1643).Google Scholar
Petau, Denis, Theologicorum dogmatum tomus primus, in quo de Deo uno, Deique proprietatibus agitur (Paris, 1644).Google Scholar
Petau, Denis, Opus de theologicis dogmatibus, ed. Alethinus, Theophilus [= Le Clerc, Jean ], 6 vols (Amsterdam, 1700).Google Scholar
Petit, Pierre, De extensione animae et rerum incorporearum natura libri II (Paris, 1665).Google Scholar
Petit, Pierre, Lettre … a Monsieur De La Chambre (Paris, 1666).Google Scholar
Petit, Pierre, Dissertations académiques sur la nature du froid et du chaud (Paris, 1671).Google Scholar
Petit, Pierre, ‘De Euemero & aliis atheis’, in Miscellanearum observationum libri quatuor (Utrecht, 1682).Google Scholar
Pfanner, Tobias, Systema theologiae gentilis purioris (Basel, 1679).Google Scholar
Philosophical Transactions, 6 (1671).Google Scholar
Philosophical Transactions, 7 (1672).Google Scholar
Pico della Mirandola, Gianfrancesco, Examen vanitatis (Mirandola, 1520).Google Scholar
Pitcairne, Archibald, The Latin poems, ed. and trans. MacQueen, J. and MacQueen, W. (Assen, 2009).Google Scholar
Plutarch, , Les oeuvres morales & meslées du Plutarque, trans. Amyot, Jacques (Paris, 1572).Google Scholar
Pococke, Edward, Specimen historiae Arabum (Oxford, 1650).Google Scholar
Pococke, Edward, Supplementum historiae dynastiarum (Oxford, 1663).Google Scholar
Poelenburg, Arnold, ‘Oratio funebris in obitum clarissimi viri D. Stephani Curcellaei’, in de Courcelles, Etienne, Opera theologica (Amsterdam, 1675).Google Scholar
Poiret, Pierre, Cogitationes rationales de Deo, anima et malo (Amsterdam, 1677).Google Scholar
Pomponazzi, Pietro, De reactione (Bologna, 1515).Google Scholar
Pomponazzi, Pietro, Corsi inediti dell’insegnamento padovano, ed. Poppi, A., 2 vols (Padua, 1966–70).Google Scholar
Porzio, Simone, De humana mente disputatio (Naples, 1551).Google Scholar
Porzio, Simone, De rerum naturalium principiis (Naples, 1553).Google Scholar
Possevino, Antonio, Bibliotheca selecta qua agitur de ratione studiorum in historia, in disciplinis, in salute omnium procuranda (Rome, 1593).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, De jure naturae et gentium [1672], ed. and trans. Simons, W., Oldfather, C. H., and Oldfather, W. A., 2 vols (Oxford, 1934).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, De jure naturae et gentium libri octo (Frankfurt, 1744).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, Of the nature and qualification of religion in reference to civil society, trans. Crull, J. [1698], ed. Zurbuchen, S. (Indianapolis, 2002).Google Scholar
Puteanus, Joannes, Commentariorum in Summam theologiae D. Thomae doctoris angelici, 2 vols (Toulouse, 1627).Google Scholar
Quercetanus, Joseph, Liber de priscorum philosophorum verae medicinae materia, praeparationis modo, atque in curandis morbis, praestantia ([Geneva], 1603).Google Scholar
Quesnel, Pasquier, Le Père Bouhours convaincu de nouveau de ses anciennes impostures … (Anvers, 1691).Google Scholar
Regis, Pierre-Sylvain, Cours entier de philosophie; ou, Systeme general selon les principes de M. Descartes, 3 vols (Amsterdam, 1691).Google Scholar
Regis, Pierre-Sylvain, Systême de philosophie, 7 vols (Lyon, 1691).Google Scholar
Regis, Pierre-Sylvain, Réponse au livre qui a pour titre P. Danielis Huetii … Censura philosophiae Cartesianae (Paris, 1691).Google Scholar
Regis, Pierre-Sylvain, L’usage de la raison et de la foy (Paris, 1704).Google Scholar
Rémond de Montmort, Pierre, ‘Dissertation sur les principes de physique de M. Descartes comparés à ceux des philosophes anglais’, L’Europe savante, 5 (1718), 209–94.Google Scholar
Rémond de Montmort, Pierre, Essai d’analyse sur les jeux de hazard (Paris, 1713).Google Scholar
Reulx, Joseph de, Le Janseniste dénonciateur de nouvelles heresies convaincu de calomnie & de falsification ([Paris], 1689).Google Scholar
Ribas, Luis de, Summa theologica (Lyon, 1643).Google Scholar
Ricci, Matteo, De Christiana expeditione apud Sinas (Cologne, 1615).Google Scholar
Ricci, Matteo, Opere storiche, ed. Tacchi Venturi, P., 2 vols (Macerata, 1913).Google Scholar
Ricci, Matteo, Fonti Ricciane: documenti originali concernenti Matteo Ricci e la storia delle prime relazioni tra l’Europa e la Cina (1579–1615), ed. d’Elia, P. M, 3 vols (Rome, 1942–9).Google Scholar
Ricci, Matteo, The true meaning of the Lord of Heaven [Tianzhu shiyi 天主實義], trans. Lancashire, D. and Hu Jo-chen, P. (Taipei, 2003).Google Scholar
Roberval, Gilles Personne de, ‘Fragment de Roberval’, in Pascal, Blaise, Oeuvres, ed. Brunschvicg, L. and Boutroux, P., 14 vols (Paris, 1908–23), ii.9–20.Google Scholar
Roberval, Gilles Personne de, ‘De vacuo narratio’, in Pascal, Blaise, Oeuvres, ed. Brunschvicg, L. and Boutroux, P., 14 vols (Paris, 1908–23), ii.21–35.Google Scholar
Rochefort, Charles de, Histoire naturelle et morale des Iles Antilles de l’Amerique (Rotterdam, 1658).Google Scholar
Rouhault, Jacques, Physica. Latinè vertit, recensuit, & adnotationibus ex illustrissimi Isaaci Newtoni philosophiâ maximam partem haustis, amplificavit & ornavit Samuel Clarke… editio tertia (London, 1710).Google Scholar
Rycaut, Paul, Histoire de l’État present de l’Empire Ottoman, trans. Briot, Pierre (Amsterdam, 1670).Google Scholar
Rycaut, Paul, Present state of the Ottoman empire (London, 1665).Google Scholar
Sánchez, Francisco, That nothing is known (Quod nihil scitur) [1576], ed. Limbrick, E. and Thomson, D. F. S. (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
Sarpi, Paolo, Istoria del Concilio Tridentino (Geneva, 1629).Google Scholar
Saumaise, Claude, Plinianae exercitationes (Paris, 1629).Google Scholar
Saurin, Elie, Examen de la théologie de Mr Jurieu (The Hague, 1694).Google Scholar
Saurin, Elie, Défense de la véritable doctrine de l’Eglise réformée sur le principe de la foy (Utrecht, 1697).Google Scholar
Scaliger, Joseph, Thesaurus temporum Eusebii Pamphili (Leiden, 1606).Google Scholar
Scherffer, Charles, Institutionum physicae pars prima, seu physica generalis, conscripta in usum suorum D.D. auditorium (Vienna, 1752).Google Scholar
Selden, John, De Diis Syris (London, 1617).Google Scholar
Selden, John, De Diis Syris … editio altera (Leiden, 1629).Google Scholar
Selden, John, De jure naturali & gentium, iuxta disciplinam Ebraeorum (London, 1640).Google Scholar
Semler, Johann Salomo, Lebensbeschreibung von ihm selbst abgefaßt (Halle, 1781).Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel, Epitome naturalis scientiae (Oxford, 1653).Google Scholar
Sentiment des Jesuites touchant le peché philosophique. Seconde lettre (Paris, 1690).Google Scholar
Severinus, Petrus, Idea medicinae philosophicae (Basel, 1571).Google Scholar
Shahrastānī, , Livre des religions et des sectes, 2 vols (Paris, 1986–93).Google Scholar
Sharrock, Robert, ΥΠΟΘΕΣΙΣ ΗΘΙΚΗ, De officiis secundum naturae jus, seu de moribus ad rationis normam conformandis doctrina (Oxford, 1660).Google Scholar
Simon, Richard, Lettres choisies de M. Simon (Amsterdam, 1721).Google Scholar
Siricius, Michael, Simonis magi haereticorum omnium patris pravitates (Giessen, 1664).Google Scholar
Sivers, Henricus, De atheismo veteribus Christianis, ob Templorum in primis aversationem, objecto, inque eosdem a nostris retorto, Exercitatio (Kiel, 1689).Google Scholar
Spanheim Jr, Friedrich, Controversiarum de religione cum dissidentibus hodie Christianis, prolixe & cum Judæis, elenchus historico-theologicus [1687] (Amsterdam, 1694).Google Scholar
The Spectator (31 July 1712).Google Scholar
Spencer, John, A discourse concerning prodigies: wherein the vanity of presages by them is reprehended (London, 1663).Google Scholar
Spencer, John, De legibus Hebraeorum, & earum rationibus (Cambridge, 1683–5).Google Scholar
Steno, Nicolas, Discours sur l’anatomie du cerveau (Paris, 1669).Google Scholar
Steuco, Agostino, De perenni philosophia libri X (Basel, 1542).Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward, Origines sacrae, or, a rational account of the grounds of Christian faith (London, 1662).Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward, A discourse concerning the idolatry practised in the Church of Rome (London, 1671).Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward, A defence of the discourse concerning the idolatry practised in the Church of Rome (London, 1676).Google Scholar
Stosch, Eberhard, Commentatio historico-critica de librorum Novi Testamenti Canone (Frankfurt, 1755).Google Scholar
Stubbe, Henry, Legends no histories, or, a specimen of some animadversions upon The history of the Royal Society (London, 1670).Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, Disputationes metaphysicae, 2 vols (Venice, 1619).Google Scholar
Suetonius Tranquillus, , Den overtuyghden Cartesiaen (Leiden, 1656).Google Scholar
Suetonius Tranquillus, , Verdedichde oprechticheyt van Suetonius Tranquillus (Leiden, 1656).Google Scholar
T. G. [Tylden, Thomas ], Catholicks no idolaters, or a full refutation of Doctor Stillingfleet’s unjust charge of idolatry against the Church of Rome (London, 1672).Google Scholar
Taurellus, Nicolaus, Philosophiae triumphus (Basel, 1573).Google Scholar
Taurellus, Nicolaus, Synopsis Aristotelis Metaphysices (Hanau, 1596).Google Scholar
Taylor, Brook, ‘Reponse à la dissertation de M. Montmor’, L’Europe savante, 9 (May 1719), 83–134.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W., ed. and trans., The atomists: Leucippus and Democritus. Fragments, a text and translation with a commentary (Toronto, 1999).Google Scholar
Telesio, Bernardino, De rerum natura (Naples, 1586).Google Scholar
Thiers, Jean-Baptiste, Traité des superstitions selon l’Ecriture sainte, les décrets des conciles, et les sentimens des Saints Pères et des théologiens (Paris, 1679).Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian, Introductio ad philosophiam aulicam … ubi ostenditur media inter praejudicia Cartesianorum, & ineptias Peripateticorum (Leipzig, 1688).Google Scholar
Thomasius, Jakob, Schediasma historicum (Leipzig, 1665).Google Scholar
Thomasius, Jakob, Theses philosophicae … De quaestione: an Deus sit materia prima? (Leipzig, 1668).Google Scholar
Thomasius, Jakob, Exercitatio de Stoica mundi exustione (Leipzig, 1676).Google Scholar
Thomasius, Jakob, Dilucidationes Stahlianae, hoc est in partem priorem Regularum Philosophicarum Danielis Stahlii praelectiones (Leipzig, 1676).Google Scholar
Thomasius, Jakob, Praefationes sub auspicia disputationum suarum in Academia Lipsiensi recitatae (Leipzig, 1681).Google Scholar
Thomasius, Jakob, Orationes, partim ex umbone Templi Academici, partim ex auditorii philosophici cathedra recitatae (Lepizig, 1683).Google Scholar
Thomasius, Jakob, Dissertationes LXIII, ed. Thomasius, Christian (Halle, 1693).Google Scholar
Thomasius, Jakob, ‘Dogma Thaletis, quod aqua sit principium omnium rerum’, in Observationum selectarum ad rem litterariam spectantium tomus II (Halle, 1700).Google Scholar
Thomassin, Louis, Memoires sur la Grace, où l’on represente les sentimens de saint Augustin … Quatrième memoire (Paris, 1682).Google Scholar
Thomassin, Louis, La methode d’etudier et d’enseigner Chrêtiennement & solidement la philosophie (Paris, 1685).Google Scholar
Tillotson, John, Discours contre la transubstantiation (London, 1685).Google Scholar
Tillotson, John, A sermon preach’d before the Queen at White-Hall, March the 7th 1689/90 (London, 1690).Google Scholar
Toland, John, Letters to Serena (London, 1704).Google Scholar
Tolomei, Giovanni Battista, Philosophia mentis et sensuum secundum utramque Aristotelis methodum pertractata metaphysice et empirice (Rome, 1696).Google Scholar
Trigault, Nicolas, De Christiana expeditione apud Sinas ab Societate Iesu suscepta, ex Matthaei Ricii commentariis libri V (Augsburg, 1615).Google Scholar
Tronchin, Louis, Theses theologicae, de Providentia Dei (Geneva, 1670).Google Scholar
Tuckney, Anthony, A good day well improved, or five sermons (London, 1656).Google Scholar
Tuckney, Anthony, Praelectiones theologicae (Amsterdam, 1679).Google Scholar
Tuckney, Anthony, ‘Eight letters of Dr. Anthony Tuckney and Dr. Benjamin Whichcote’, in Moral and religious aphorisms (London, 1753).Google Scholar
Turretin, Francis, Institutes of elenctic theology, trans. Giger, G. M., ed. Dennison, J. T., 3 vols (Phillipsburg, NJ, 1997).Google Scholar
Twells, Leonard, A reply to the defence of the dissertation (London, 1732).Google Scholar
Twisse, William, Vindiciae gratiae, potestatis, ac providentiae Dei hoc est, ad examen libelli Perkinsiani de praedestinatione modo et ordine, institutum a J. Arminio, responsio scholastica (Amsterdam, 1632).Google Scholar
Twisse, William, Dissertatio de scientia media tribus libris absoluta (Arnhem, 1639).Google Scholar
Ursinus, Johann Heinrich, De Zoroastre Bactriano, Hermete Trismegisto, Sanchoniathone Phoenicio, eorumque scriptis (Nuremberg, 1661).Google Scholar
Valignano, Alexander, Catechismus Christianae fidei, in quo veritas nostrae religionis ostenditur, & sectae Iaponenses confutantur (Lisbon, 1586).Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo, Dialectical disputations, ed. and trans. Copenhaver, B. and Nauta, L., 2 vols (Cambridge, MA, 2012).Google Scholar
Voetius, Gisbertus, Selectae disputationes theologicae, 4 vols (Utrecht, 1648–67).Google Scholar
Voetius, Gisbertus, Selectae disputationes theologicae, 5 vols (Amsterdam and Utrecht, 1667–9).Google Scholar
Volkelius, Johannes, De vera religione libri quinque ([Amsterdam], 1642).Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerardus Johannes, Historia Pelagiana sive historiae de controversiis quas Pelagius ejusque reliquiae moverunt (Leiden, 1618).Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerardus Johannes, De theologia gentili, et physiologia Christiana; sive de origine ac progressu idololatriae (Amsterdam, 1641).Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerardus Johannes, Gerardi Johan. Vossii et clarorum virorum ad eum epistolae, ed. Colomiès, P. (London, 1690).Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerardus Johannes, De theologia gentili, et physiologia Christiana; sive de origine ac progressu idololatriae, in Opera, 6 vols (Amsterdam, 1695–1701), v (1700).Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerardus Johannes, Opera omnia, 6 vols (Amsterdam, 1695–1701).Google Scholar
Wachter, Johann Georg, Elucidarius cabalisticus, sive reconditae Hebraeorum philosophiae brevis & succincta recensione (‘Rome’ [Halle], 1706).Google Scholar
Wall, Adam, An Account of the different ceremonies observed in the Senate House of the University of Cambridge (Cambridge, 1798).Google Scholar
Wallis, John, ‘Hypothesis about the Flux and Reflux of the Sea’, Philosophical Transactions, 1 (1665), 263–89.Google Scholar
Wallis, John, ‘A summary account by Dr John Wallis of the General Laws of Motion’, Philosophical Transactions, 3 (1668), 33–44.Google Scholar
Wallis, John, Mechanica: sive de motu, tractatus geometricus (London, 1670).Google Scholar
Walton, Brian, The considerator considered (London, 1659).Google Scholar
Warburton, William, The doctrine of grace, 2 vols (London, 1763).Google Scholar
Ward, Samuel, Gratia discriminans (London, 1627).Google Scholar
Westminster Assembly, ‘Epistle to the Reader’, in The confession of faith, together with the larger and lesser catechisms, 2nd ed. (London, 1658).Google Scholar
Whewell, William, ‘Preface’, The mathematical works of Isaac Barrow, D.D. (Cambridge, 1860).Google Scholar
Whiston, William, Sermons and essays upon several subjects (London, 1709).Google Scholar
Whiston, William, Proposal for printing by subscription, Mr. Whiston’s collection entituled Primitive Christianity reviv’d (n.p., 1710).Google Scholar
Whiston, William, An historical preface to primitive Christianity reviv’d (London, 1711).Google Scholar
Whiston, William, Primitive Christianity reviv’d. Volume III: An essay on the Apostolical Constitutions (London, 1711).Google Scholar
Whiston, William, Primitive Christianity reviv’d. Part IV: An account of the faith of the first centuries, concerning the ever-blessed Trinity (London, 1712).Google Scholar
Whiston, William, ‘Some observations on Dr. Clarke’s Scripture Doctrine of the Trinity’, Primitive Christianity reviv’d. Volume V (London, 1712).Google Scholar
Whiston, William, Three essays (London, 1713).Google Scholar
Whiston, William, Historical memoirs of the life of Dr. Samuel Clarke … the second edition, corrected (London, 1730).Google Scholar
Whiston, William, Memoirs of the life and writings of Mr. William Whiston (London, 1749).Google Scholar
Wilkins, D., ed., Concilia Magnae Britanniae et Hiberniae, 4 vols (London, 1737).Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas, Diatribae duae medico-philosophicae (London, 1659).Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas, Diatribae duae medico-philosophicae … editio secunda, ab authore recognita (London, 1660).Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas, De anima brutorum quae hominis vitalis ac sensitiva est, exercitationes duae (London, 1672).Google Scholar
Wing, Vincent, Astronomia instaurata (London, 1656).Google Scholar
Wing, Vincent, Astronomia Britannica (London, 1669).Google Scholar
Wittich, Christoph, Dissertationes duae (Amsterdam, 1653).Google Scholar
Wittie, Robert, Pyrologia mimica, or, An answer to hydrologia chymica of William Sympson (London, 1669).Google Scholar
Wyttenbach, Daniel, Tentamen theologiae dogmaticae methodo scientifico pertractatae, 3 vols (Frankfurt, 1747–9).Google Scholar
Adams, M. M., Some later medieval theories of the Eucharist (Oxford, 2010).Google Scholar
Adams, M. P., ‘Hobbes on natural philosophy as “true physics” and mixed mathematics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 46 (2016), 43–51.Google Scholar
Aiton, E. J., The vortex theory of planetary motions (London, 1972).Google Scholar
Aiton, E. J., ‘Johannes Kepler and astronomy without hypothesis’, Japanese Studies in the History of Science, 14 (1975), 49–71.Google Scholar
Allard, H. J., ‘Barthout Nihuys’, in Jaarboekje van Alberdingk Thijm (1891), 135–200.Google Scholar
Almagor, J., Pierre Des Maizeaux (1673–1745), journalist and English correspondent for Franco-Dutch periodicals, 1700–1720 (Amsterdam, 1989).Google Scholar
Andrade Martins, R. de, ‘Huygens’s reaction to Newton’s gravitational theory’, in Renaissance and Revolution, ed. Field, J. V. and James, F. A. J. L. (Cambridge, 1993), 203–14.Google Scholar
Andrault, R., ‘Human brain and human mind: the Discourse on the anatomy of the brain and its philosophical reception’, in Steno and the philosophers, ed. Andrault, R. and Lærke, M. (Leiden, 2018), 87–112.Google Scholar
André, P., La vie du R. P. Malebranche: prêtre de l’Oratoire avec l’histoire de ses ouvrages (Paris, 1886).Google Scholar
Ángel Granada, M., ‘“Spiritus” and “anima a Deo imissa”’, in Bernardino Telesio and the natural sciences in the Renaissance, ed. Omodeo, P. D. (Leiden, 2019), 33–50.Google Scholar
Anstey, P., ‘Boyle on occasionalism: an unexamined source’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 60 (1999), 57–81.Google Scholar
Anstey, P., The philosophy of Robert Boyle (New York, 2000).Google Scholar
Anstey, P., ‘Robert Boyle and the heuristic value of mechanism’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33 (2002), 157–70.Google Scholar
Anstey, P., John Locke and natural philosophy (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Anstey, P., ‘Experimental pedagogy and the eclipse of Robert Boyle in England’, Intellectual History Review, 25 (2015), 115–31.Google Scholar
Antognazza, M. R., Leibniz: an intellectual biography (Cambridge, 2011).Google Scholar
Antoniotti, L.-M., ‘La volonté antécédente et conséquente selon saint Jean Damascène et saint Thomas d’Aquin’, Revue Thomiste, 65 (1965), 52–77.Google Scholar
App, U., The birth of orientalism (Philadelphia, 2011).Google Scholar
App, U., The cult of emptiness: the Western discovery of Buddhist thought and the invention of Oriental philosophy (Wil, 2012).Google Scholar
Applebaum, W., ‘Kepler in England: the reception of Keplerian astronomy in England, 1599–1687’. PhD thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo (1969).Google Scholar
Applebaum, W., ‘Keplerian astronomy after Kepler: researches and problems’, History of Science, 34 (1996), 451–504.Google Scholar
Apt, A. J., ‘The reception of Kepler’s astronomy in England: 1596–1690’. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford (1982).Google Scholar
Ariew, R., Descartes and the last scholastics (Ithaca, NY, 1999).Google Scholar
Ariew, R., Descartes among the scholastics (Leiden, 2011).Google Scholar
Armand, G., Les fictions à vocation scientifique, de Cyrano de Bergerac à Diderot (Pessac, 2013).Google Scholar
Armogathe, J.-R., Theologia Cartesiana: l’explication physique de l’Eucharistie chez Descartes et Dom Desgabets (The Hague, 1977).Google Scholar
Armogathe, J.-R. and Carraud, V., ‘La première condamnation des Œuvres de Descartes, d’après des documents inédits des Archives du Saint-Office’, Nouvelles de la République des Lettres, 2 (2001), 103–37.Google Scholar
Armstrong, B., Calvinism and the Amyraut heresy (Madison, 1969).Google Scholar
Arthur, R., ‘Beeckman, Descartes and the force of motion’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45 (2007), 1–28.Google Scholar
Ashley, B., ‘St. Albert and the nature of natural science’, in Albertus Magnus and the sciences, ed. Weisheipl, J. A. (Toronto, 1980), 73–102.Google Scholar
Asselt, W. J. van, The federal theology of Johannes Cocceius (1603–1669) (Leiden, 2001).Google Scholar
Asselt, W. J. van, ‘Introduction’, in Junius, Franciscus, A treatise on true theology, trans. Noe, D. (Grand Rapids, 2014).Google Scholar
Asselt, W. J. van et al., ed., Reformed thought on freedom (Grand Rapids, 2010).Google Scholar
Attfield, R., ‘Clarke, Collins and compounds’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 15 (1977), 45–54.Google Scholar
Auger, L., Un savant méconnu: Gilles Personne de Roberval (Paris, 1962).Google Scholar
Aulotte, R., Amyot et Plutarque: la tradition des Moralia au XVIe siècle (Geneva, 1965).Google Scholar
Axworthy, A., ‘The debate between Peletier and Clavius on superposition’, Historia Mathematica, 45 (2018), 1–38.Google Scholar
Backus, I., ‘Loci communes: ein Medium der europäischen Reformation bei Calvin, Vermigli und Bullinger’, in Calvinismus in Deutschland und Europa, ed. Witt, S. (Dresden, 2009), 97–103.Google Scholar
Backus, I., ‘Loci communes, and the role of Ramism in the European diffusion of Calvin’s Reformation’, Dimensioni e problemi della ricerca storica, 2 (2010), 234–47.Google Scholar
Bakker, P. J. M., ‘Natural philosophy, metaphysics, or something in between? Agostino Nifo, Pietro Pomponazzi, and Marcantonio Genua on the nature and place of the science of the soul’, in Mind, cognition and representation: the tradition of commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima, ed. Bakker, P. J. M. and Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (Aldershot, 2007), 151–78.Google Scholar
Baku, G., ‘Der Streit um den Naturbegriff am Ende des 17. Jahrhunderts’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 98 (1891), 162–90.Google Scholar
Baldini, U., ‘Giovanni Alfonso Borelli biologo e fisico negli studi recenti’, Physis, 16 (1974), 234–66.Google Scholar
Baldini, U., Legem impone subactis: studi su filosofia e scienza dei Gesuiti in Italia, 1540–1632 (Rome, 1992).Google Scholar
Baldini, U., ‘Boscovich e la tradizione Gesuitica in filosofia naturale: continuità e cambiamento’, in R. J. Boscovich, vita e attività scientifica, ed. Bursill-Hall, P. (Rome, 1993), 81–132.Google Scholar
Baldini, U., ‘Die Philosophie und die Wissenschaften im Jesuitenorden’, in Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie: die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 1., ed. Schobinger, J.-P. (Basel, 1998), 669–769.Google Scholar
Baldini, U. ‘The development of Jesuit “physics” in Italy, 1550–1770: a structural approach’, in Philosophy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, ed. Blackwell, C. and Kusukawa, S. (Aldershot, 1999), 248–79.Google Scholar
Baldini, U. and Napolitani, P. D., ‘Per una biografia di Luca Valerio: fonti edite e inedite per una ricostruzione della sua carriera scientifica’, Bolletino di storia delle scienze mathematiche, 11 (1991), 3–157.Google Scholar
Ballor, J., ‘“In the footsteps of the Thomists”: an analysis of Thomism in the Junius–Arminius correspondence’, in Beyond Dordt and De auxiliis, ed. Ballor, J. et al. (Leiden, 2019), 127–47.Google Scholar
Ballor, J. et al., ed., Church and school in early modern Protestantism (Leiden, 2013).Google Scholar
Ballor, J. et al., ed., Beyond Dordt and De auxiliis (Leiden, 2019).Google Scholar
Balsamo, L., Antonio Possevino S.I. bibliografo della Controriforma e diffusione della sua opera in area anglicana (Florence, 2006).Google Scholar
Baroncini, G., Forme di esperienza e rivoluzione scientifica (Florence, 1992).Google Scholar
Bauer, R., ‘Los grandes cometas de 1680/1681 y la política del saber criollo en la Nueva España y la Nueva Inglaterra’, Revista Iberoamericana, 75 (2009), 697–715.Google Scholar
Beaujot, J.-P., ‘Du syntagme “erreur populaire” et de ses ambiguïtés chez Pierre Bayle’, in Beiträge zur Analyse des sozialen Wortschatzes, ed. Ricken, U. (Halle, 1975–7), 59–70.Google Scholar
Bechler, Z., Newton’s physics and the conceptual structure of the scientific revolution (Dordrecht, 1991).Google Scholar
Beck, A., Gisbertus Voetius (1589–1676): sein Theologieverständnis und seine Gotteslehre (Göttingen, 2007).Google Scholar
Beeley, P., ‘Leibniz on Wachter’s Elucidarius cabalisticus: a critical edition of the so-called ‘Réfutation de Spinoza’, Leibniz Review, 12 (2002), i–viii.Google Scholar
Belda Plans, J., La escuela de Salamanca y la renovación de la teología en el siglo XVI (Madrid, 2000).Google Scholar
Belkind, O., ‘On Newtonian induction’, Philosophy of Science, 84 (2017), 677–97.Google Scholar
Bell, M. D., ‘Maccovius (1588–1644) on the Son of God as αὐτόθεος’, Church History and Religious Culture, 91 (2011), 105–19.Google Scholar
Bellhouse, D., ‘Banishing Fortuna: Montmort and de Moivre’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 69 (2008), 559–81.Google Scholar
Bellis, D., ‘Nos in diem vivimus: Gassendi’s probabilism and academic philosophy from day to day’, in Academic scepticism in the development of early modern philosophy, ed. Smith, P. J. and Charles, S. (Leiden, 2017), 125–52.Google Scholar
Belozubov, L., L’Europe savante (1718–20) (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Beltrán, V., Domingo Báñez y las controversias sobre la gracia: textos y documentos (Salamanca, 1968).Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A., ‘Hooke and Wren and the system of the world: some points towards an historical account’, British Journal for the History of Science, 8 (1975), 32–61.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A., ‘A note on theories of respiration and muscular action in England, c.1660 (Christopher Wren)’, Medical History, 20 (1976), 59–69.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A., ‘Cosmology and the magnetical philosophy, 1640–1680’, Journal of the History of Astronomy, 12 (1981), 165–77.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A., ‘Magnetical philosophy and astronomy from Wilkins to Hooke’, The general history of astronomy, vol. II, Part A, ed. Taton, R. and Wilson, C. (Cambridge, 1989), 222–30.Google Scholar
Berkel, K. van, ‘Descartes’ debt to Beeckman: inspiration, cooperation, conflict’, in Descartes’ natural philosophy, ed. Gaukroger, S., Schuster, J., and Sutton, J. (London, 2000), 46–59.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, D., ‘Guido Ubaldo Dal Monte and the Archimedean revival’, Nuncius, 7 (1992), 3–34.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, D., Equivalence and priority: Newton versus Leibniz (Oxford, 1993).Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, D., ‘Caroline, Leibniz, and Clarke’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 60 (1999), 469–86.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, D., Thinking with objects: the transformation of mechanics in the seventeenth century (Baltimore, 2006).Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, D., ‘The collaboration between anatomists and mathematicians in the mid-seventeenth century with a study of images as experiments and Galileo’s role in Steno’s “Myology”’, Early Science and Medicine, 13 (2008) 665–709.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, D., ‘The axiomatic tradition in seventeenth-century mechanics’, in Discourse on a new method, ed. Domski, M. and Dickson, M. (Chicago, 2010), 23–42.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, D., Mechanism, experiment, disease: Marcello Malpighi and seventeenth-century anatomy (Baltimore, 2011).Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, D., ‘Early modern experimentation on live animals’, Journal of the History of Biology, 46 (2013), 199–226.Google Scholar
Besselink, L., ‘The impious hypothesis revisited’, Grotiana, 9 (1988), 3–63.Google Scholar
Betz, L.-P., Piere Bayle und die Nouvelles de la République des Lettres, 1684–1687 (Geneva, 1987).Google Scholar
Bevilacqua, A., The republic of Arabic letters: Islam and the European enlightenment (Cambridge, MA, 2018).Google Scholar
Beylard, H., ‘Le péché philosophique: quelques précisions historiques et doctrinales’, Nouvelle Revue Théologique, 62 (1935), 591–616, 673–98.Google Scholar
Biagioli, M., Galileo, courtier: the practice of science in the culture of absolutism (Chicago, 1993).Google Scholar
Bianchi, L., ‘Des novateurs modernes en la philosophie: Telesio tra eruditi e libertini nella Francia del Seicento’, in Bernardino Telesio e la cultura napoletana (Naples, 1992), 374–416.Google Scholar
Bianchi, L., ed., Pierre Bayle e l’Italia (Naples, 1996).Google Scholar
Biener, Z., ‘Galileo’s first new science: the science of matter’, Perspectives on Science, 12 (2004), 262–87.Google Scholar
Biener, Z., ‘The unity of science in early-modern philosophy: subalternation, metaphysics and the geometrical manner in scholasticism, Galileo and Descartes’. PhD Thesis, University of Pittsburgh (2008).Google Scholar
Biener, Z., ‘Hobbes on the order of sciences: a partial defense of the mathematization thesis’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 54 (2016), 312–32.Google Scholar
Biener, Z., ‘Newton’s regulae philosophandi’, The Oxford Handbook of Newton, ed. Schliesser, E. and Smeenk, C. (Oxford, forthcoming). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199930418.013.4.Google Scholar
Billanovich, M., ‘Benedetto Bordon e Giulio Cesare Scaligero’, Italia medioevale e umanistica, 11 (1968), 187–256.Google Scholar
Binbaş, I. E., Intellectual networks in Timurid Iran: Sharaf al-Dīn ‘Alī Yazdī and the Islamicate Republic of Letters (Cambridge, 2016).Google Scholar
Blank, A., ‘Atoms and minds in Walter Charleton’s theory of animal generation’, in The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy, ed. Smith, J. (Cambridge, 2006), 124–46.Google Scholar
Blank, A., ‘Existential dependence and the question of emanative causation in Protestant metaphysics, 1570–1620’, Intellectual History Review, 19 (2009), 1–13.Google Scholar
Blank, A., ‘Julius Caesar Scaliger on plant generation and the question of species constancy’, Early Science and Medicine, 15 (2010).Google Scholar
Blank, A., ‘Daniel Sennert on poisons, epilepsy, and subordinate forms’, Perspectives on Science, 19 (2011), 192–211.Google Scholar
Blank, A., ‘Nicolaus Taurellus on forms and elements’, Science in Context, 27 (2014), 659–82.Google Scholar
Blay, M., La Naissance de la mécanique analytique (Paris, 1992).Google Scholar
Bloch, O., La philosophie de Gassendi: nominalisme, matérialisme, et métaphysique (The Hague, 1971).Google Scholar
Blom, H., Morality and causality: the rise of naturalism in Dutch seventeenth-century political thought (Utrecht, 1995).Google Scholar
Blum, P. R., ‘Der Standardkurs der katholischen Schulphilosophie im 17. Jahrhundert’, in Aristotelismus und Renaissance, ed. Keßler, E. et al. (Wiesbaden, 1988), 127–48.Google Scholar
Blum, P. R., Philosophenphilosophie und Schulphilosophie: Typen des Philosophierens in der Neuzeit (Stuttgart, 1998).Google Scholar
Blum, P. R., ‘Grundzüge der katholischen Schulphilosophie’, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts, IV: das heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa, 2 vols (Basel, 2001), 302–30.Google Scholar
Blum, P. R., Studies on early modern Aristotelianism (Leiden, 2012).Google Scholar
Boantza, V., ‘Reflections on matter and manner: Duclos reads Boyle, 1668–69’, in Chymists and chymistry: studies in the history of alchemy and early modern chemistry, ed. Principe, L. M. (New York, 2007).Google Scholar
Boantza, V., ‘Alkahest and fire: debating matter, chymistry and natural history at the early Parisian Academy of Sciences’, in The body as object and instrument of knowledge, ed. Wolfe, C. T. and Gal, O. (Dordrecht, 2010), 75–92.Google Scholar
Boantza, V., Matter and method in the long chemical revolution: laws of another order (Farnham, 2013).Google Scholar
Boas, M., ‘Hero’s Pneumatica: a study of its transmission and influence’, ISIS, 40 (1949), 38–48.Google Scholar
Bobro, M., ‘Leibniz on concurrence and efficient causation’, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 46 (2008), 317–38.Google Scholar
Bochenski, I. M., ‘The Indian variety of logic’, repr. in Indian logic: a reader, ed. Ganeri, J. (London, 2001), 117–50.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, S. and Rey, A.-L., ed., What does it mean to be an empiricist? Empiricisms in eighteenth century sciences (Leiden, 2018).Google Scholar
Boer, E. A. de, ‘“O, ye women, think of thy innocent children, when they die young!” The Canons of Dordt (First Head, Article Seventeen) between polemic and pastoral theology’, in Revisiting the Synod of Dordt (1618–19), ed. Goudriaan, A. and van Leiburg, F. (Leiden, 2011), 261–90.Google Scholar
Boland, V., Ideas in God according to Saint Thomas Aquinas: sources and synthesis (Leiden, 1996).Google Scholar
Bondeli, M., ‘The history of philosophy as progress towards a system of reason’, in From Hegel to Windelband: historiography of philosophy in the 19th century, ed. Hartung, G. and Pluder, V. (Berlin, 2015), 63–80.Google Scholar
Bonino, S.-T., ‘L’école thomiste au XVe siècle’, Rivista teologica di Lugano, 5 (2000), 223–34.Google Scholar
Bonnant, G., Le livre genevois sous l’ancien régime (Geneva, 1999).Google Scholar
Bopp, K., Drei Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik (Berlin, 1929), 19–66.Google Scholar
Bordoli, R., Ragione e scrittura tra Descartes e Spinoza: saggio sulla ‘Philosophia S. Scripturae Interpres’ di Lodewijk Meyer e sulla sua recezione (Milan, 1997).Google Scholar
Borgeaud, C., Histoire de l’Université de Genève, 4 vols (Geneva, 1900).Google Scholar
Borghero, C., La certezza e la storia: Cartesianismo, pirronismo e conoscenza storica (Milan, 1983).Google Scholar
Boschiero, L., Experiment and natural philosophy in seventeenth-century Tuscany: the history of the Accademia del Cimento (Dordrecht, 2007).Google Scholar
Bost, H., ‘Les pasteurs français au refuge des Provinces-Unies’, in La vie intellectuelle aux refuges protestants, ed. Häseler, J. and McKenna, A. (Paris, 1999), 9–18.Google Scholar
Bost, H., Pierre Bayle (Paris, 2006).Google Scholar
Bost, H., Le Consistoire de l’église wallonne de Rotterdam, 1681–1706 (Paris, 2008).Google Scholar
Bost, H., ed., Les Eclaircissements de Pierre Bayle (Paris, 2010).Google Scholar
Bost, H. and McKenna, A., ‘Introduction’, in L’affaire Bayle: la bataille entre Pierre Bayle et Pierre Jurieu devant le consistoire de l’Eglise wallonne de Rotterdam (Lyon, 2006), 1–29.Google Scholar
Bost, H. and McKenna, A., L’affaire Bayle: la bataille entre Pierre Bayle et Pierre Jurieu devant le consistoire de l’Eglise wallonne de Rotterdam (Lyon, 2006).Google Scholar
Bots, H., ‘Pierre Bayle en de Rotterdamse Illustre School, 1681–1693’, in Rotterdams Jaarboekje (1982), 176–201.Google Scholar
Bots, H., ed., Un ‘intellectuel’ avant la lettre. Le journaliste Pierre Bayle (1647–1706): l’actualité religieuse dans les Nouvelles de la République des Lettres (1684–1687) (Amsterdam, 1994).Google Scholar
Bots, H., ‘Le réseau épistolaire de Jacques Bernard et les Nouvelles de la République des Lettres (1699–1710)’, Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences, 63 (2013), 161–73.Google Scholar
Bots, H. and Maass, L., ‘Introduction’, in Le réseau d’information de Jacques Bernard (1658–1718): au service des ‘Nouvelles de la République des Lettres’. Un dossier de 95 lettres 1700–1709 (Amsterdam, 2008), 3–17.Google Scholar
Boudri, J. C., What was mechanical about mechanics: the concept of force between metaphysics and mechanics from Newton to Lagrange (Dordrecht, 2002).Google Scholar
Bourlier, E., ed., Livre Synodal contenant les articles résolus dans les Synodes des Eglises wallonnes des Pays-Bas, 2 vols (The Hague, 1896–1904).Google Scholar
Bowler, P. J., ‘Preformation and pre-existence in the seventeenth century: a brief analysis’, Journal of the History of Biology, 4 (1971), 221–44.Google Scholar
Bowles, G., ‘Physical, human and divine attraction in the life and thought of George Cheyne’, Annals of Science, 31 (1974), 473–88.Google Scholar
Bracken, H. M., ‘Bayle’s attack on natural theology: the case of Christian Pyrrhonism’, in Scepticism and irreligion in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, ed. Popkin, R. H. and Vanderjagt, A. (Leiden, 1993), 254–66.Google Scholar
Bracken, H. M., ‘Pierre Jurieu: the politics of prophecy’, in Millenarianism and Messianism in early modern European culture, iv: Continental millenarians, ed. Laursen, J. C. (Dordrecht, 2001), 85–94.Google Scholar
Brading, K., Émilie Du Châtelet and the foundations of physical science (New York, 2019).Google Scholar
Brett, A., ‘Authority, reason and the self-definition of theologians in the Spanish “Second Scholastic”’, in Forms of the ‘Medieval’ in the ‘Renaissance’, ed. Tucker, G. (Charlottesville, 2000), 63–90.Google Scholar
Brewer, D., The enlightenment past: reconstructing eighteenth-century French thought (Cambridge, 2008).Google Scholar
Briggs, E., ‘Les manuscrits de Charles Le Cène (1647?–1703) dans la Bibliothèque de la Huguenot Society of London’, Tijdschrift voor de Studie van de Verlichting, 5 (1977), 358–78.Google Scholar
Brockey, L. M., Journey to the East: the Jesuit mission to China, 1579–1724 (Cambridge, MA, 2007).Google Scholar
Brogi, S., Teologia senza verità: Bayle contro i ‘rationaux’ (Milan, 1998).Google Scholar
Broman, T., ‘Criticism and the circulation of news: the scholarly press in the late seventeenth century’, History of Science, 51 (2013), 125–50.Google Scholar
Brotto, G. and Zonga, G., La facoltà teologica dell’Università di Padova (Padua, 1922).Google Scholar
Brower, J. E., Aquinas’s ontology of the material world: change, hylomorphism, and material objects (Oxford, 2014).Google Scholar
Brown, G., ‘Did Samuel Clarke really disavow action at a distance in his correspondence with Leibniz? Newton, Clarke, and Bentley on gravitation and action at a distance’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 60 (2016), 38–47.Google Scholar
Brown, H., ‘Pierre Bayle and natural science: an unpublished letter to Robert Boyle’, Romanic Review, 25 (1934), 361–7.Google Scholar
Brown, H., Scientific organisations in seventeenth century France (New York, 1934).Google Scholar
Brown, S., ‘Two papers by John Toland: his “Remarques critiques sur le Systême de M. Leibniz …” and the last of his Letters to Serena’, Quaderni di filosofia, 4 (1999), 55–79.Google Scholar
Brundell, B., Pierre Gassendi: from Aristotelianism to a new natural philosophy (Dordrecht, 1987).Google Scholar
Brundtland, T., ‘From medicine to natural philosophy: Francis Hauksbee’s way to the air-pump’, British Journal for the History of Science, 31 (2008), 209–40.Google Scholar
Buccolini, C., ‘Mersenne translator of Bacon?’, Journal of Early Modern Studies, 2 (2013), 33–59.Google Scholar
Buchwald, J. Z. and Feingold, M., Newton and the origins of civilization (Princeton, 2013), 126–63.Google Scholar
Bunge, W. van, From Stevin to Spinoza: an essay on philosophy in the seventeenth-century Dutch Republic (Leiden, 2001).Google Scholar
Bunge, W. van and Bots, H., ed., Pierre Bayle (1647–1706), le philosophe de Rotterdam: philosophy, religion and reception (Leiden, 2008).Google Scholar
Burke, P., ‘Two crises of historical consciousness’, Storia della Storiografia, 33 (1998), 3–16.Google Scholar
Burke, P., ‘The philosopher as traveller: Bernier’s Orient’, in Voyages and visions: towards a cultural history of travel, ed. Elsner, J. and Rubiés, J.-P. (London, 1999), 124–37.Google Scholar
Burke, P., ‘History, myth, and fiction: doubts and debates’, in The Oxford history of historical writing, vol. III: 1400–1800, ed. Rabasa, J. et al. (Oxford, 2012), 261–80.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. N., ‘The educational roots of Reformed scholasticism: dialectic and scriptural exegesis in the sixteenth century’, Dutch Review of Church History, 84 (2004), 299–317.Google Scholar
Burns, W., ‘“Our lot is fallen into an age of wonders”: John Spencer and the controversy over prodigies in the early Restoration’, Albion, 27 (1995), 237–52.Google Scholar
Burrows, M. S., Jean Gerson and De consolatione theologiae (1418) (Tübingen, 1991).Google Scholar
Burton, S. J. G., ‘Samuel Rutherford’s Euthyphro dilemma: a Reformed perspective on the scholastic natural law tradition’, in Reformed Orthodoxy in Scotland, ed. Denlinger, A. (Edinburgh, 2014), 123–39.Google Scholar
Burtt, E. A., The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science (London, 1932).Google Scholar
Bussotti, P., The complex itinerary of Leibniz’s planetary theory (Dordrecht, 2015).Google Scholar
Bylebyl, J., ‘The School of Padua: humanistic medicine in the sixteenth century’, in Health, medicine and mortality in the sixteenth century, ed. Webster, C. and Pelling, M. (Cambridge, 1979), 335–70.Google Scholar
Cancik, H., Religionsgeschichten: Römer, Juden und Christen im römischen Reich, ed. Cancik-Lindemaier, H. (Tübingen, 2008), 3–27.Google Scholar
Candeaux, J.-D., ‘Genève au temps de Pierre Bayle: la relation de Hieronymus Brückner’, in Bayle et le protestantisme, ed. Magdelaine, M. et al. (Paris, 1996), 255–72.Google Scholar
Cappiello, A., ‘Veritas rerum vs mens philosophorum? The debate on the immortality of the soul in Italy after the publication of the Bull Apostolici regiminis (1513): Cajetan, Pomponazzi, Spina, Prierias, Javelli’, in AITHER Journal, 6 (2015), 54–75.Google Scholar
Cappiello, A., and Lamanna, M., ‘Il principio dell’unicità del vero dalla bolla Apostolici regiminis (1513) alla Rivoluzione scientifica’, Quaestio, 14 (2014), 229–56.Google Scholar
Carabin, D., ‘Comment Goulart indexe-t-il le Plutarque d’Amyot?’, Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance, 65 (2003), 331–45.Google Scholar
Carey, D., Locke, Shaftesbury, and Hutcheson: contesting diversity in the enlightenment and beyond (Cambridge, 2005).Google Scholar
Carriero, J., ‘Newton on space and time: comments on J. E. Mcguire’, in Philosophical perspectives on Newtonian science, ed. Bricker, P. and Hughes, R. I. G. (Cambridge, MA, 1990), 109–34.Google Scholar
Casalini, C., ‘Pererio “cattivo maestro”: su un cold case nella storia della pedagogia gesuitica’, Quaderni di Noctua, 2 (2014), 59–110.Google Scholar
Casini, P., ‘Newton: the Classical Scholia’, History of Science, 22 (1984), 1–46.Google Scholar
Cassan, E., ‘The status of Bacon in Gassendi’s Syntagma philosophicum history of logic’, Societate şi politicǎ, 6 (2012), 80–9.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., The philosophy of the enlightenment (Princeton, 1951).Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., Gesammelte Werke, ed. Recki, B. et al. (Hamburg, 1998–).Google Scholar
Castelli, D., ‘Tra ricerca empirica e osservazione scientifica: gli studi ittiologici di Simone Porzio’, Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences, 57 (2007), 105–23.Google Scholar
Catana, L., The historiographical concept ‘system of philosophy’: its origin, nature, influence and legitimacy (Leiden, 2008).Google Scholar
Caverni, R., Il metodo sperimentale in Italia, 6 vols (Florence, 1891–1900).Google Scholar
Ceñal, R., ‘Emmanuel Maignan: su vida, su obra, su influencia’, Revista de estudios politicos, 66 (1952), 111–50.Google Scholar
Ceñal, R., ‘La filosofía de Emmanuel Maignan’, Revista de Filosofía, 13 (1954), 15–68.Google Scholar
Cerny, G., Theology, politics and letters at the crossroads of European civilization: Jacques Basnage and the Baylean Huguenot refugees in the Dutch Republic (Dordrecht, 1987).Google Scholar
Ceyssens, L., ‘Autour du péché philosophique’, Augustiniana, 14 (1964), 378–425.Google Scholar
Ceyssens, L., ‘Les débuts du jansénisme et de l’antijansénisme à Louvain’, in Facultas S. Theologiae Lovaniensis 1432–1792, ed. van Eijl, E. J. M. (Louvain, 1977), 381–431.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A., The scientist’s atom and the philosopher’s stone: how science succeeded and philosophy failed to gain knowledge of atoms (Dordrecht, 2009).Google Scholar
Chalmers, A. ‘Understanding science through its history: a response to Newman’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42 (2011), 150–3.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A., ‘Intermediate causes and explanations: the key to understanding the scientific revolution’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43 (2012), 551–62.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A., One hundred years of pressure: hydrostatics from Stevin to Newton (Dordrecht, 2017).Google Scholar
Champion, J., The pillars of priestcraft shaken (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar
Chiew, S. S., Middle knowledge and biblical interpretation: Luis de Molina, Herman Bavinck, and William Lane Craig (Frankfurt, 2016).Google Scholar
Clair, P., Louis Thomassin (1619–1695): étude biographique et bibliographique (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar
Clark, W., ‘The death of metaphysics in enlightened Prussia’, in The sciences in enlightened Europe, ed. Clark, W. et al. (Chicago, 1999), 423–76.Google Scholar
Clarke, D., ‘Descartes’ use of “demonstration” and “deduction”’, The Schoolman, 44 (1977), 333–44.Google Scholar
Clericuzio, A., ‘A redefinition of Boyle’s chemistry and corpuscular philosophy’, Annals of Science, 47 (1990), 561–89.Google Scholar
Clericuzio, A., Elements, principles, and corpuscles: a study of atomism and chemistry in the seventeenth century (Dordrecht, 2000).Google Scholar
Clericuzio, A., ‘Mechanism and chemical medicine in seventeenth-century England: Boyle’s investigation of ferments and fermentation’, in Early modern medicine and natural philosophy, ed. Distelzweig, P., Goldberg, B., and Ragland, E. R. (Leiden, 2016), 271–94.Google Scholar
Clericuzio, A., ‘Gassendi and the English mechanical philosophers’, Galilaeana, 15 (2018), 3–29.Google Scholar
Cloes, H., ‘La systématisation théologique pendant la première moitié du XIIe siècle’, Ephemerides theologicae Lovanienses, 34 (1958), 277–329.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. F., ‘Stock and bulk in the latest Newton scholarship’, British Journal for the History of Science, 51 (2018), 687–701.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B., ‘Hypotheses in Newton’s philosophy’, Physis, 8 (1966), 163–84.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B., Introduction to Newton’s Principia (Cambridge, 1971).Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B., The Newtonian revolution (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B. ‘Newton’s copy of Leibniz’s Théodicée: with some remarks on the turned-down pages of books in Newton’s library’, ISIS, 73 (1982), 410–14.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B., ‘Guide to Newton’s Principia’, in Newton, Isaac, The Principia, ed. and trans. Cohen, I. B., Whitman, A., and Budenz, J. (Cambridge, MA, 1999), 1–370.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B. and Koyré, A., ‘Newton and the Leibniz–Clarke correspondence, with notes on Newton, Conti, and Des Maizeaux’, Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences, 15 (1962), 63–126.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G., ‘Introduction’, in The Cambridge companion to Newton, 1st ed. (Cambridge, 2002), 1–32.Google Scholar
Collani, C. von, ‘Charles Maigrot’s role in the Chinese Rites controversy’, in The Chinese Rites controversy, ed. Mungello, D. E. (Nettetal, 1994), 149–83.Google Scholar
Collani, C. von, ‘Theologie und Chronologie in Martinis Sinicae Historiae Decas Prima (1658)’, in Martino Martini S.J. (1614–1661) und die Chinamission im 17. Jahrhundert, ed. Malek, R. and Zingerle, A. (Sankt Augustin, 2000), 146–83.Google Scholar
Collis, K., ‘Reading the Bible in the “early enlightenment”: philosophy and the ars critica in Jean Le Clerc’s early theological dialogues’, Erudition and the Republic of Letters, 1 (2016), 121–50.Google Scholar
Congar, Y., ‘Théologie’, in Dictionnaire de théologie catholique, 15 (Paris, 1946), cols 341–502.Google Scholar
Connolly, P. J., ‘Newton and God’s sensorium’, Intellectual History Review, 24 (2014), 185–201.Google Scholar
Connolly, P. J., ‘Lockean superaddition and Lockean humility’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 51 (2015), 53–61.Google Scholar
Cook, A., ‘Edmond Halley and Newton’s Principia’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 45 (1991), 129–38.Google Scholar
Cooper, M., ‘Rodrigues in China: the letters of João Rodrigues, 1611–1633’, in Kokugoshi e no michi: doi senseis shōju kinen ronbunshō, vol. II (Tokyo, 1981), 231–355.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, B., ‘Jewish theologies of space in the scientific revolution: Henry More, Joseph Raphson, Isaac Newton and their predecessors’, Annals of Science, 37 (1980), 489–548.Google Scholar
Corréard, N., ‘Les égarements de la physique cartésienne dans le Voyage du monde de Descartes du R. P. Gabriel Daniel (1691)’, in L’errance au XVIIe siècle, ed. Desjardins, L., Pio, M.-C., and Roy, R. (Tübingen, 2017), 323–40.Google Scholar
Cosentino, G., ‘L’insegnamento delle matematiche nei collegi Gesuitici nell’Italia settentrionale: nota introduttiva’, Physis, 13 (1971), 205–17.Google Scholar
Costabel, P., ‘La controverse Descartes–Roberval au sujet du centre d’oscillation’, Revue des sciences humaines, 61 (1951), 74–86.Google Scholar
Cowdrick, R., The early reading of Pierre Bayle (Scottdale, PA, 1939).Google Scholar
Cozzoli, D., ‘Alessandro Piccolomini on the certitude of mathematics’, History and Philosophy of Logic, 28 (2007), 151–71.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L., The problem of divine foreknowledge and future contingents from Aristotle to Suarez (Leiden, 1988).Google Scholar
Crombie, A. C., ‘Mathematics and Platonism in the sixteenth-century Italian universities and in Jesuit educational policy’, in Prismata: Naturwissenschaftsgeschichtliche Studien, ed. Maeyama, Y. and Saltzer, W. G. (Wiesbaden, 1977), 63–94.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. S., A question of rites: Friar Domingo Navarrete and the Jesuits in China (Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar
Cunningham, A., ‘Fabricius and the “Aristotle project” in anatomical teaching and research in Padua’, in The medical Renaissance of the sixteenth century, ed. Wear, A. et al. (Cambridge, 1985), 195–222.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A., ‘How the Principia got its name; or, taking natural philosophy seriously’, History of Science, 29 (1991), 377–92.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A., The anatomical Renaissance: the resurrection of the anatomical projects of the ancients (Aldershot, 1997).Google Scholar
D’Angers, J. E., ‘Le Stoïcisme d’après l’Humanitas theologica de P. Lescalopier, S.J. (1660)’, Bulletin de littérature Ecclésiastique, 56 (1955), 23–36.Google Scholar
Dagen, J., L’histoire de l’esprit humain dans la pensée française de Fontenelle à Condorcet (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar
Daugirdas, K., ‘The biblical hermeneutics of Socinians and Remonstrants in the seventeenth century’, in Arminius, Arminianism, and Europe, ed. van Leeuwen, T. et al. (Leiden, 2009), 89–114.Google Scholar
Davy, J., ‘La condamnation en Sorbonne des “Nouveaux mémoires sur la Chine”, du P. le Comte: les débuts de l’affaire’, Recherches de science religieuse, 37 (1950), 366–97.Google Scholar
De Angelis, S., Anthropologien: Genese und Konfiguration einer ‘Wissenschaft vom Menschen’ in der Frühen Neuzeit (Berlin, 2010).Google Scholar
De Caro, M., ‘On Galileo’s Platonism, again’, in Hypotheses and perspectives within history and philosophy of science, ed. Agassi, J. et al. (Dordrecht, 2018), 84–104.Google Scholar
De Franceschi, S. H., ‘L’empire thomiste dans les querelles doctrinales de l’âge classique: le statut théologique de saint Thomas d’Aquin au XVIIe siècle’, XVIIe Siècle, 62 (2010), 313–34.Google Scholar
De Franceschi, S. H., La puissance et la gloire: l’orthodoxie thomiste au péril du jansénisme (1663–1724) (Paris, 2011).Google Scholar
De Pace, A., Le matematiche e il mondo (Milan, 1993).Google Scholar
De Vocht, H. History of the foundation and the rise of the Collegium trilingue Lovaniense, 1517–1550, 4 vols (Louvain, 1951–5).Google Scholar
Dear, P., ‘Marin Mersenne and the probabilistic roots of “mitigated scepticism”’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 22 (1984), 173–205.Google Scholar
Dear, P., Mersenne and the learning of the schools (Ithaca, NY, 1988).Google Scholar
Dear, P., Discipline and experience: the mathematical way in the scientific revolution (Chicago, 1995).Google Scholar
Dear, P., ‘What is the history of science the history of? Early modern roots of the ideology of modern science’, Isis, 96 (2005), 390–406.Google Scholar
Dear, P., ‘Historiography of not-so-recent science’, History of Science, 1 (2012), 197–211.Google Scholar
Debus, A. G., The French Paracelsians (Cambridge, 1991).Google Scholar
Deitz, L., ‘Do we have any genuine works by Aristotle? Francesco Patrizi da Cherso’s discussion of the corpus Aristotelicum’, Intellectual History Review, 29 (2019), 545–60.Google Scholar
Dekker, E., ‘Was Arminius a Molinist?’, Sixteenth Century Journal, 27 (1996), 337–52.Google Scholar
Del Prete, A., ‘Un cartésianisme “hérétique”: Pierre-Sylvain Regis’, Corpus, 61 (2011), 189–203.Google Scholar
Del Prete, A., ‘Per una mappa del cartesianesimo: il Système de philosophie di Pierre-Sylvain Regis’, Studi filosofici, 49 (2016), 95–112.Google Scholar
Del Prete, A., ‘Duplex intellectus et sermo duplex: method and the separation of disciplines in Johannes De Raey’, in Physics and metaphysics in Descartes and in his reception, ed. Antoine-Mahut, D. and Roux, S. (New York, 2019), 161–74.Google Scholar
Del Soldato, E., Simone Porzio: un aristotelico tra natura e grazia (Rome, 2010).Google Scholar
Delcourt, M., ‘Une lettre de Ramus à Joachim Rheticus’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé, 44 (1934), 5–15.Google Scholar
Delgado, M., ‘Die neue theologische Methode Melchior Canos (1563) und die Erneuerung der römisch-katholischen Theologie’, in Zwischen Reform und Abgrenzung: die römische Kirche und die Reformation, ed. Kohnle, A. and Beyer, M. (Stuttgart, 2014), 11–39.Google Scholar
Denton, C., Decadence, radicalism, and the early modern French nobility (Lanham, 2017).Google Scholar
Des Chene, D., Physiologia: natural philosophy in late Aristotelian and Cartesian thought (Ithaca, NY, 1996).Google Scholar
Des Chene, D., ‘Mechanisms of life in the seventeenth century: Borelli, Perrault, Régis’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36 (2005), 245–60.Google Scholar
Des Chene, D., ‘Animal as category: Bayle’s “Rorarius”’, in The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy, ed. Smith, J. and Ruse, M. (Cambridge, 2006), 215–32.Google Scholar
Des Chene, D., ‘Suárez on propinquity and the efficient cause’, in The philosophy of Suárez, ed. Hill, D. and Lagerlund, H. (Oxford, 2012), 89–100.Google Scholar
Detlefsen, K., ‘Biology and theology in Malebranche’s theory of organic generation’, in The life sciences in early modern philosophy, ed. Nachtomy, O. and Smith, J. (Oxford, 2014), 137–56.Google Scholar
Dew, N., Orientalism in Louis XIV’s France (Oxford, 2009).Google Scholar
Di Bella, S., La storia della filosofia nell’aetas kantiana: teorie e discussioni (Naples, 2008).Google Scholar
Di Liscia, A. D., ‘Johannes Kepler, Meister der scientiae mediae’, Akademie Aktuell, 23 (2007), 56–62.Google Scholar
Di Simone, M. R., ‘Admission’, in A history of the university in Europe, ii: Universities in early modern Europe (1500–1800), ed. de Ridder-Symoens, H. (Cambridge, 1996), 285–325.Google Scholar
Dibon, P., ed., Pierre Bayle, le philosophe de Rotterdam (Amsterdam, 1959).Google Scholar
Dieter, T., Der junge Luther und Aristoteles: eine historisch-systematische Untersuchung zum Verhältnis von Theologie und Philosophie (Berlin, 2001).Google Scholar
Dieter, T., ‘Luther as late medieval theologian: his positive and negative use of nominalism and realism’, in The Oxford handbook of Martin Luther’s theology, ed. Kolb, R. et al. (Oxford, 2014), 31–48.Google Scholar
Dobbs, B. J., The foundations of Newton’s alchemy (Cambridge, 1975).Google Scholar
Dobbs, B. J., The Janus face of genius: the role of alchemy in Newton’s thought (Cambridge, 1991).Google Scholar
Dobre, M., Descartes and early French Cartesianism: between metaphysics and physics (Bucharest, 2017).Google Scholar
Dobre, M., and Nyden, T., ‘Introduction’, in Cartesian empiricisms, ed. Dobre, M. and Nyden, T. (Dordrecht, 2013), 1–24.Google Scholar
Dodge, G. H., The political theory of the Huguenots of the Dispersion, with special reference to the thought and influence of Pierre Jurieu (New York, 1947).Google Scholar
Dompnier, B., Le venin de l’hérésie: image du protestantisme et combat catholique au XVIIe siècle (Paris, 1985).Google Scholar
Dompnier, B., ‘Les hommes d’Eglise et la superstition entre XVII et XVIII siècles’, in La superstition à l’âge des lumières, ed. Dompnier, B. (Paris, 1998), 13–47.Google Scholar
Domski, M., ‘The constructible and the intelligible in Newton’s philosophy of geometry’, Philosophy of Science, 70 (2003), 1114–24.Google Scholar
Domski, M., ‘Newton’s empiricism and metaphysics’, Philosophy Compass, 5 (2010), 525–34.Google Scholar
Domski, M., ‘Locke’s qualified embrace of Newton’s Principia’, in Interpreting Newton, ed. Janiak, A. and Schliesser, E. (Cambridge, 2012), 48–68.Google Scholar
Domski, M., ‘Observation and mathematics’, in The Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the seventeenth century, ed. Anstey, P. R. (Oxford, 2013), 144–67.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J., ‘Italian influences on the development of Calvinist scholasticism’, The Sixteenth Century Journal, 7 (1976), 81–101.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J. P., ‘Calvinist Thomism’, Viator, 7 (1976), 441–55.Google Scholar
Drake, S., Discoveries and opinions of Galileo (New York, 1957).Google Scholar
Drake, S., Galileo studies (Ann Arbor, 1970).Google Scholar
Drake, S. and Drabkin, I. E., Mechanics in Italy (Madison, 1969).Google Scholar
Dray, J., ‘The Protestant academy of Saumur and its relations with the Oratorians of les Ardilliers’, History of European Ideas, 9 (1988), 465–78.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, G., ‘Introduction’, in Malebranche, Nicolas, Œuvres complètes, ed. Robinet, A., 22 vols (Paris, 1958–84), v.Google Scholar
Droge, A. J., Homer or Moses? (Tübingen, 1989).Google Scholar
Duchesneau, F., ‘Malpighi, Descartes and the epistemological problems of iatromechanism’, in Reason, experiment, and mysticism in the scientific revolution, ed. Righini Bonelli, M. L. and Shea, W. R. (New York, 1975), 111–30.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, F., La dynamique de Leibniz (Paris, 1994).Google Scholar
Ducheyne, S., ‘Newton’s training in the Aristotelian textbook tradition: from effects to causes and back’, History of Science, 43 (2005), 217–37.Google Scholar
Ducheyne, S., ‘The General Scholium: some notes on Newton’s published and unpublished endeavours’, Lias, 33 (2006), 223–74.Google Scholar
Ducheyne, S., ‘Anti-Trinitarianism in Newton’s General Scholium to the Principia’, European Journal of Science and Technology, 5 (2009), 1–11.Google Scholar
Ducheyne, S., The main business of natural philosophy: Isaac Newton’s natural-philosophical methodology (Dordrecht, 2012).Google Scholar
Ducheyne, S., ‘’s Gravesande’s appropriation of Newton’s natural philosophy, Part I: epistemological and theological issues’, Centaurus, 56 (2014), 31–55.Google Scholar
Ducheyne, S., ‘An editorial history of Newton’s regulae philosophandi’, Estudios de Filosofía, 51 (2015), 143–64.Google Scholar
Duffy, E., ‘“Whiston’s affair”: the trials of a primitive Christian, 1709–1714’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 27 (1976), 129–50.Google Scholar
Dulles, A. C., A history of apologetics (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
Duncan, S., ‘Hobbes on language: propositions, truth, and absurdity’, The Oxford handbook of Hobbes, ed. Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, K. (Oxford, 2016), 60–75.Google Scholar
Dunlop, K., ‘What geometry postulates: Newton and Barrow on the relationship of mathematics to nature’, in Interpreting Newton, ed. Janiak, A. and Schliesser, E. (Cambridge, 2011), 69–101.Google Scholar
Dupré, S., ‘Kepler’s optics without hypotheses’, Synthese, 185 (2012), 501–25.Google Scholar
Dybowski, J., ‘Introduction’, in The correspondence of Anthony Collins, 1676–1729, freethinker (Paris, 2011), 17–50.Google Scholar
Dyck, M. van, ‘Gravitating towards stability: Guidobaldo’s Aristotelian–Archimedean synthesis’, History of Science, 44 (2006), 373–407.Google Scholar
Eagles, C. M., ‘David Gregory and Newtonian science’, British Journal for the History of Science, 10 (1977), 216–25.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, K.-O., Christoph Wittich (1625–1687): Reformierte Theologie unter dem Einfluss von René Descartes (Göttingen, 2018).Google Scholar
Edelstein, D., The enlightenment: a genealogy (Chicago, 2010).Google Scholar
Edwards, M., ‘Suárez in a late scholastic context: anatomy, psychology, and authority’, in The philosophy of Francisco Suárez, ed. Hill, B. and Lagerlund, H. (Oxford, 2012), 25–37.Google Scholar
Eijl, E. J. M. van, ‘La controverse louvaniste autour de la grâce et du libre arbitre à la fin du XVIe siècle’, in L’Augustinisme à l’ancienne faculté de théologie de Louvain, ed. Lamberigts, M. (Louvain, 1994), 207–82.Google Scholar
Elisseeff, D., Nicolas Fréret (1688–1749): réflexions d’un humaniste du XVIIIe siècle sur la Chine (Paris, 1978).Google Scholar
Ellis, B., Calvin, classical Trinitarianism, and the aseity of the Son (Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar
Emerton, N. E., The scientific reinterpretation of form (Ithaca, NY, 1984).Google Scholar
Eschweiler, K., ‘Die Philosophie der spanische Spätscholastik auf den deutschen Universitäten des Siebzehnten Jahrhunderts’, in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Kulturgeschichte Spaniens, ed. Finke, H. (Münster, 1928), 251–83.Google Scholar
Facca, D., ‘Humana mens corruptibilis: l’antiaverroismo di Simone Porzio’, in Filosofia, filologia, biologia: itinerari dell’aristotelismo cinquecentesco (Rome, 1992), 5–104.Google Scholar
Farge, J., Orthodoxy and Reform in early Reformation France: the Faculty of Theology of Paris, 1500–1543 (Leiden, 1985).Google Scholar
Farquhar, A. J. J., ‘Promoting civility in the Republic of Letters: three Sedan scholars and the secular muse’, Erudition and the Republic of Letters, 3 (2008), 113–54.Google Scholar
Fatio, O., Méthode et théologie: Lambert Daneau et les débuts de la scolastique réformée (Geneva, 1976).Google Scholar
Fatio, O., ‘Prêcher à Genève en 1669’, in De l’humanisme aux lumières: Bayle et le protestantisme, ed. Magdelaine, M. et al. (Paris, 1996), 149–55.Google Scholar
Fatio, O., Louis Tronchin: une transition calvinienne (Paris, 2015).Google Scholar
Fattori, M., ‘La diffusione di Francis Bacon nel libertinismo francese’, Rivista di storia della filosofia, 57 (2003), 225–42.Google Scholar
Fauvelle-Aymar, F. X., ‘Four wordlists of extinct Cape Khoekhoe from the 18th century’, Studies in African Linguistics, 34 (2005), 159–78.Google Scholar
Favaro, A., Lo Studio di Padova e la Compagnia di Gesù sul finire del secolo decimosesto: narrazione documentata (Venice, 1878).Google Scholar
Favino, F., ‘On the Cimento’s “Oak Academies”: an unknown contribution by Antonio Oliva’, in The Accademia del Cimento and its European context, ed. Beretta, M. et al. (Sagamore Beach, 2009), 91–120.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, L., ‘Brook Taylor and the method of increments’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 34 (1985), 1–140.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, L., ‘The fragmentation of the European mathematical community’, in The investigation of difficult things, ed. Harman, P. M. and Shapiro, A. E. (Cambridge, 1992), 383–97.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., The mathematicians’ apprenticeship: science, universities and society in England, 1560–1640 (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘Isaac Barrow: divine, scholar, mathematician’, in Before Newton: the life and times of Isaac Barrow, ed. Feingold, M. (Cambridge, 1990), 1–104.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘Barrow’s library’, in Before Newton: the life and times of Isaac Barrow, ed. Feingold, M. (Cambridge, 1990), 333–72.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘The humanities’, in The history of the University of Oxford, iv: seventeenth-century Oxford, ed. Tyacke, N. (Oxford, 1997), 211–358.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘Mathematical sciences and new philosophies’, in The history of the University of Oxford, iv: seventeenth-century Oxford, ed. Tyacke, N. (Oxford, 1997), 359–448.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘Science as a calling? The early modern dilemma’, Science in Context, 15 (2002), 79–119.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., The Newtonian moment: Isaac Newton and the making of modern culture (New York, 2004).Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘Isaac Newton, heretic? Some eighteenth-century perceptions’, in Reading Newton in early modern Europe, ed. Boran, E. and Feingold, M. (Leiden, 2017), 328–46.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. P., Dr. Samuel Clarke: an eighteenth century heretic (Kineton, 1976).Google Scholar
Ferretti, G., Un ‘soldat-philosophe’: Philippe Fortin de La Hoguette, 1585–1668 (Genoa, 1988).Google Scholar
Ferretti, G., ‘The Testament of La Hoguette and its sources’, French History, 15 (2001), 123–38.Google Scholar
Figala, K., ‘Newton as alchemist’, History of Science, 15 (1977), 102–37.Google Scholar
Figala, K. and Petzold, U., ‘Alchemy in the Newtonian circle’, in Renaissance and revolution, ed. Field, J. and James, F. (Cambridge, 1997), 173–91.Google Scholar
Findlen, P., Possessing nature: museums, collecting, and scientific culture in early modern Italy (Berkeley, 1994).Google Scholar
Findlen, P., ‘Anatomy theaters, botanical gardens, and natural history collections’, in The Cambridge history of science: early modern science, ed. Park, K. and Daston, L. (Cambridge, 2003), 272–89.Google Scholar
Fisher, S., Pierre Gassendi’s philosophy and science: atomism for empiricists (Leiden, 2005).Google Scholar
Fix, A., ‘Bekker and Bayle on comets’, in Geschiedenis van de wijsbegeerte in Nederland, 11 (2000), 81–96.Google Scholar
Force, J. E., ‘Newton’s God of Dominion: the unity of Newton’s theological, scientific and political force’, in Essays on the context, nature, and influence of Isaac Newton’s theology, ed. Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1990), 75–102.Google Scholar
Force, J. E., ‘The nature of Newton’s “holy alliance” between science and religion: from the scientific revolution to Newton (and back again)’, in Rethinking the scientific revolution, ed. Osler, M. J. (Cambridge, 2000), 247–69.Google Scholar
Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H., ed., Essays on the context, nature, and influence of Isaac Newton’s theology (Dordrecht, 1990).Google Scholar
Forlivesi, M., ‘Impure ontology: the nature of metaphysics and its object in Francisco Suárez’s texts’, Quaestio, 5 (2005), 559–86.Google Scholar
Forlivesi, M., ‘Approaching the debate on the subject of metaphysics from the later middle ages to the early modern age: the ancient and medieval antecedents’, Medioevo, 34 (2009), 1–49.Google Scholar
Fosi, I., Convertire lo straniero: forestieri e Inquisizione a Roma in età moderna (Rome, 2011).Google Scholar
Frank, R., ‘Institutional structure and scientific activity in the early Royal Society’, in Proceedings of the fourteenth Congress of the History of Science (Tokyo, 1976), iv.82–101, at 87–8.Google Scholar
Frank, R., Harvey and the Oxford physiologists (Los Angeles, 1980).Google Scholar
Freddoso, A. J., ‘God’s general concurrence with secondary causes: why conservation is not enough’, Philosophical Perspectives, 5 (1991), 553–85.Google Scholar
Freddoso, A. J., ‘Ockham on faith and reason’, in The Cambridge companion to Ockham, ed. Spade, P. V. (Cambridge, 1999), 326–49.Google Scholar
Freedman, J., ‘Philosophy instruction within the institutional framework of central European schools and universities during the Reformation era’, History of Universities, 5 (1985), 117–66.Google Scholar
Freedman, J. S., European academic philosophy in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries (Hildesheim, 1985).Google Scholar
Freedman, J., ‘Encyclopedic philosophical writings in central Europe during the high and late Renaissance (c.1500–c.1700)’, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 37 (1994), 212–56.Google Scholar
Freedman, J., ‘The career and writings of Bartholomew Keckermann (d. 1609)’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 141 (1997), 305–64.Google Scholar
French, R., William Harvey’s natural philosophy (Cambridge, 1994).Google Scholar
Friedman, M., ‘Newton and Kant on absolute space: from theology to transcendental philosophy’, in Constituting objectivity, ed. Bitbol, M. et al. (Dordrecht, 2009), 35–50.Google Scholar
Friedman, R. L., Medieval Trinitarian thought from Aquinas to Ockham (Cambridge, 2010).Google Scholar
Friedman, R. L., Intellectual traditions at the medieval university: the use of philosophical psychology in Trinitarian theology among the Franciscans and Dominicans, 1250–1350 (Leiden, 2013).Google Scholar
Friedrich, M., Die Grenzen der Vernunft: Theologie, Philosophie und gelehrte Konflikte am Beispiel des Helmstedter Hofmannstreits und seiner Wirkungen auf das Luthertum um 1600 (Göttingen, 2004).Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., The mechanization of the heart: Harvey and Descartes, trans. Grene, M. (Rochester, NY, 2001).Google Scholar
Gabbey, A., ‘Huygens et Roberval’, in Huygens et la France (Paris, 1982), 69–83.Google Scholar
Gabbey, A., ‘The Bourdelot Academy and the mechanical philosophy’, Seventeenth-Century French Studies, 6 (1984), 92–103.Google Scholar
Gabbey, A., ‘Newton’s Mathematical principles of natural philosophy: a treatise on “mechanics”?’, in The investigation of difficult things, ed. Harman, P. M. and Shapiro, A. E. (Cambridge, 1992), 305–22.Google Scholar
Gaetano, M. T., ‘Renaissance Thomism at the University of Padua, 1465–1583’. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania (2013).Google Scholar
Gagnebin, B., ‘De la cause de la pesanteur: mémoire de Nicolas Fatio de Duillier présenté à la Royal Society le 25 février 1690’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 6 (1949), 105–24.Google Scholar
Gal, O. and Chen-Morris, R., ‘Baroque optics and the disappearance of the observer: from Kepler’s optics to Descartes’ doubt’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 71 (2010), 191–217.Google Scholar
Gallego Salvadores, J., ‘La aparición de las primeras metafísicas en la España del XVI’, Escritos de Vedat, 3 (1973), 91–162.Google Scholar
Galluzzi, P., ‘Il “Platonismo” del tardo cinquecento e la filosofia di Galileo’, in Ricerche sulla cultura dell’Italia moderna, ed. Zambelli, P. (Bari, 1973), 39–79.Google Scholar
Galluzzi, P., Momento: studi galileiani (Rome, 1979).Google Scholar
Galluzzi, P., ‘Gassendi and l’Affaire Galilée of the laws of motion’, Science in Context, 13 (2000), 509–45.Google Scholar
Garber, D., ‘Leibniz and the foundations of physics: the middle years’, in The natural philosophy of Leibniz, ed. Okruhlik, K. (Dordrecht, 1985), 27–130.Google Scholar
Garber, D., Descartes’ metaphysical physics (Chicago, 1992).Google Scholar
Garber, D., ‘Defending Aristotle/defending society in early 17th century Paris’, in Wissensideale und Wissenskulturen in der frühen Neuzeit, ed. Detel, W. and Zittel, C. (Berlin, 2002), 135–60.Google Scholar
Garber, D., ‘On the frontlines of the scientific revolution: how Mersenne learned to love Galileo’, Perspectives on Science, 12 (2004), 135–63.Google Scholar
Garber, D., Leibniz: body, substance, monad (Oxford, 2009).Google Scholar
Garber, D., ‘Telesio among the novatores: Telesio’s reception in the seventeenth century’, in Early modern philosophers and the Renaissance legacy, ed. Muratori, C. and Paganini, G. (Dordrecht, 2016), 119–34.Google Scholar
Garrison, J. W., ‘Newton and the relation of mathematics to natural philosophy’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 48 (1987), 609–27.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, S., The emergence of a scientific culture: science and the shaping of modernity, 1210–1685 (Oxford, 2006).Google Scholar
Gaukroger, S., The collapse of mechanism and the rise of sensibility: science and the shaping of modernity, 1680–1760 (Oxford, 2010).Google Scholar
Gaukroger, S., Civilization and the culture of science: science and the shaping of modernity, 1795–1935 (Oxford, 2020).Google Scholar
Gaukroger, S. and Schuster, J., ‘The hydrostatic paradox and the origins of Cartesian dynamics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33 (2002), 535–72.Google Scholar
Gay, J.-P., Morales en conflit: théologie et polémique au grand siècle, 1640–1700 (Paris, 2011).Google Scholar
Gay, J.-P., ‘Stratégies polémiques et champ doctrinal: la querelle du péché philosophique et les lignes de fracture d’un catholicisme fin de siècle’, in Ruine et survie de Port-Royal (1679–1713), ed. De Franceschi, S. and Mathis, R. (Paris, 2012), 167–200.Google Scholar
Gay, J.-P., Jesuit civil wars: theology, politics and government under Tirso González (1687–1705) (Aldershot, 2012).Google Scholar
Gay, J.-P., ‘Lettres de controverse: religion, publication et espace public en France au XVIIe siècle’, Annales, 68 (2013), 5–41.Google Scholar
Gemelli, B., Isaac Beeckman: atomista e lettore critico di Lucrezio (Florence, 2002).Google Scholar
Genuth, S., ‘Comets, teleology, and the relationship of chemistry to cosmology in Newton’s thought’, Annali dell’Istituto e Museo di storia della scienza di Firenze, 10 (1985), 31–65.Google Scholar
Genuth, S., Comets, popular culture, and the birth of modern cosmology (Princeton, NJ, 1997).Google Scholar
Ghio, M., ‘Causa emanativa e causa immanente: S. Tommaso e G. Bruno’, Filosofia, 30 (1979), 529–54.Google Scholar
Giaccobe, G. C., ‘Epigoni nel seicento della “Quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum”: Giuseppe Biancani’, Physis, 18 (1976), 5–40.Google Scholar
Giacobbe, G. C., ‘Un gesuita progressista nella “Quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum”: Benito Pereyra’, Physis, 19 (1977), 51–86.Google Scholar
Giacon, C., La seconda scolastica, 3 vols (Milan, 1944–50).Google Scholar
Gibson, W. C., ‘The bio-medical pursuits of Christopher Wren’, Medical History, 14 (1970), 331–41.Google Scholar
Gielis, M., ‘Leuven theologians as opponents of Erasmus and of humanistic theology’, in Biblical humanism and scholasticism in the age of Erasmus, ed. Rummel, E. (Leiden, 2008), 197–214.Google Scholar
Gigas, E., ‘La première ébauche d’un ouvrage célèbre’, in Bulletin de la Commission de l’histoire des Eglises wallonnes, 7 (1896), 65–74.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N., Renaissance concepts of method (New York, 1960).Google Scholar
Gilliam, P. R., ‘William Whiston: no longer an Arian’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 66 (2015), 755–71.Google Scholar
Girbal, F., Bernard Lamy (1640–1715): étude biographique et bibliographique (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar
Glawe, W., Die Hellenisierung des Christentums in der Geschichte der Theologie von Luther bis auf die Gegenwart (Berlin, 1912).Google Scholar
Glei, R., ‘Et invidus et inbecillus: das angebliche Epikurfragment bei Laktanz, De ira dei 13,20–21’, Vigiliae Christianae, 42 (1988), 47–58.Google Scholar
Goldberg, B., ‘William Harvey on anatomy and experience’, Perspectives on Science, 24 (2016), 305–23.Google Scholar
Goldgar, A., Impolite learning: conduct and community in the Republic of Letters, 1680–1750 (New Haven, 1995).Google Scholar
Goldish, M., Judaism in the theology of Sir Isaac Newton (Dordrecht, 1998).Google Scholar
Golvers, N., ‘The development of the Confucius Sinarum philosophus reconsidered in the light of new material’, in Western learning and Christianity in China, ed. Malek, R. (Sankt Augustin, 1998), 1141–64.Google Scholar
Gómez López, S., ‘Marcello Malpighi and atomism’, in Marcello Malpighi: anatomist and physician, ed. Bertoloni Meli, D. (Florence, 1997), 175–89.Google Scholar
Gómez López, S., ‘Experiments and thoughts on light around the Accademia del Cimento’, in The Accademia del Cimento and its European context, ed. Beretta, M. et al. (Sagamore Beach, 2009), 45–58.Google Scholar
Gootjes, A., ‘“A smattering of the new philosophy”: Etienne Gaussen (ca. 1638–1675) and the Cartesian question at Saumur’, in Church and school in early modern Protestantism, ed. Ballor, J. et al. (Leiden, 2013), 583–96.Google Scholar
Gootjes, A., Claude Pajon (1626–1685) and the Academy of Saumur: the first controversy over grace (Leiden, 2014).Google Scholar
Gorham, G., ‘How Newton solved the mind–body problem’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 28 (2011), 21–44.Google Scholar
Gorham, G., ‘Newton on God’s relation to space and time: the Cartesian framework’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 93 (2011), 281–320.Google Scholar
Gorham, G. and Slowik, E., ‘Locke and Newton on space and time and their sensible measures’, in Newton and empiricism, ed. Biener, Z. and Schliesser, E. (Oxford, 2014), 119–37.Google Scholar
Gorham, G. et al., ed., The language of nature: reassessing the mathematization of natural philosophy in the seventeenth century (Minneapolis, 2016).Google Scholar
Gori, G., La fondazione dell’esperienza in ’s Gravesande (Florence, 1972).Google Scholar
Goris, H., ‘Thomism in fifteenth-century Germany’, in Aquinas as authority, ed. van Geest, P., Goris, H., and Leget, C. (Utrecht, 2002), 1–24.Google Scholar
Goudriaan, A., Reformed orthodoxy and philosophy, 1625–1750 (Leiden, 2006).Google Scholar
Grabill, S. J., Rediscovering the natural law in Reformed theological ethics (Grand Rapids, 2006).Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘Prolegomena to Friedrich August Wolf’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 44 (1981), 101–29.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘Protestant versus prophet: Isaac Casaubon on Hermes Trismegistus’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 46 (1983), 78–93.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., Defenders of the text (Cambridge, 1991).Google Scholar
Grafton, A., Joseph Scaliger, vol. II (Oxford, 1993).Google Scholar
Grafton, A., What was history? The art of history in early modern Europe (Cambridge, 2007).Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘Christian Hebraism and the rediscovery of Hellenistic Judaism’, in Jewish culture in early modern Europe, ed. Cohen, R. I. et al. (Pittsburgh, 2014), 169–80.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘Christianity’s Jewish origins rediscovered: the roles of comparison in early modern ecclesiastical scholarship’, Erudition and the Republic of Letters, 1 (2016), 13–42.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘Scaliger’s chronology: early patterns of reception’, in Confessionalisation and erudition in early modern Europe: an episode in the history of the humanities, ed. Hardy, N. and Levitin, D. (Oxford, 2019), 154–93.Google Scholar
Grant, E., Much ado about nothing: theories of space and vacuum from the middle ages to the scientific revolution (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
Grant, E., ‘God and natural philosophy: the late middle ages and Sir Isaac Newton’, Early Science and Medicine, 5 (2000), 279–98.Google Scholar
Greenham, P., ‘Isaac Newton, scholar: an exceptional example of normal erudition’, History Compass, 15 (2017), 1–12.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W., ed., A companion to Arber (Oxford, 1967).Google Scholar
Gregory, Crauford, ‘Notice concerning an autograph manuscript of Isaac Newton’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 12 (1834), 64–76.Google Scholar
Grell, C., ed., Nicolas Fréret, légende et vérité (Oxford, 1994).Google Scholar
Grendler, P., The universities of the Italian Renaissance (Baltimore, 2002).Google Scholar
Grene, R. A., ‘Henry More and Robert Boyle on the spirit of nature’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 32 (1962), 451–72.Google Scholar
Gres-Gayer, J. M., ‘Tradition et modernité: le réforme des études en Sorbonne (1673–1715)’, Revue d’histoire de l’Eglise de France, 88 (2002), 341–89.Google Scholar
Guellouz, S., ed., Pierre-Daniel Huet (1630–1721) (Paris, 1994).Google Scholar
Guelluy, R., ‘L’évolution des méthodes théologiques à Louvain d’Erasme à Jansénius’, Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique, 37 (1941), 31–144.Google Scholar
Guerlac, H., ‘Sir Isaac and the ingenious Mr. Hauksbee’, in Mélanges Alexandre Koyré: l’aventure de la science, ed. Cohen, I. B. and Taton, R. (Paris, 1964), 229–53.Google Scholar
Guerlac, H., Newton on the Continent (Ithaca, NY, 1981).Google Scholar
Guerrini, A., ‘The Tory Newtonians: Gregory, Pitcairne, and their circle’, Journal of British Studies, 25 (1986), 288–311.Google Scholar
Guerrini, A., ‘Archibald Pitcairne and Newtonian medicine’, Medical History, 31 (1987), 70–83.Google Scholar
Guerrini, A., Obesity and depression in the Enlightenment: the life and times of George Cheyne (Norman, OK, 1999).Google Scholar
Guerrini, A., ‘Gregory, David’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Guerrini, A., ‘Experiments, causation and the uses of vivisection’, Journal of the History of Biology, 46 (2013), 227–54.Google Scholar
Guerrini, A., The courtiers’ anatomists: animals and humans in Louis XIV’s Paris (Chicago, 2015).Google Scholar
Guicciardini, N., ‘Johann Bernoulli, John Keill and the inverse problem of central forces’, Annals of Science, 52 (1995), 537–75.Google Scholar
Guicciardini, N., The development of Newtonian calculus in Britain, 1700–1800 (Cambridge, 2003).Google Scholar
Guicciardini, N., ‘Reconsidering the Hooke–Newton debate on gravitation: recent results’, Early Science and Medicine, 10 (2005).Google Scholar
Guicciardini, N., Isaac Newton on mathematical certainty and method (Cambridge, MA, 2009).Google Scholar
Guicciardini, N., Isaac Newton and natural philosophy (London, 2018).Google Scholar
Guillemin, T., ‘Correspondants, relations et réseaux dans les “Papiers de jeunesse” d’Isaac Papin (1676–1685)’, Bulletin de la Société de l’histoire du protestantisme français, 159 (2013).Google Scholar
Gunther, R. T., Early science in Oxford, 15 vols (Oxford, 1920–68).Google Scholar
Haase, E., Einführung in die Literatur des Refuge: der Beitrag der französischen Protestanten zur Entwicklung analytischer Denkformen am Ende des 17. Jahrhunderts (Berlin, 1959).Google Scholar
Häfner, R., ‘Jacob Thomasius und die Geschichte der Häresien’, in Christian Thomasius (1655–1728), ed. Vollhardt, F. (Tübingen, 1997), 141–64.Google Scholar
Häfner, R., Götter im Exil: frühneuzeitliches Dichtungsverständnis im Spannungsfeld christlicher Apologetik und philologischer Kritik (ca. 1590–1736) (Tübingen, 2003).Google Scholar
Haga, J., Was there a Lutheran metaphysics? The interpretation of communicatio idiomatum in early modern Lutheranism (Göttingen, 2012).Google Scholar
Hägglund, B., Theologie und Philosophie bei Luther und in der occamistischen Tradition: Luthers Stellung zu der Theorie von der doppelten Wahrheit (Lund, 1955).Google Scholar
Hall, A., Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus: natural theology in the high middle ages (London, 2007).Google Scholar
Hall, A. R., ‘Mechanics and the Royal Society’, British Journal for the History of Science, 3 (1966), 24–38.Google Scholar
Hall, A. R., Philosophers at war: the quarrel between Newton and Leibniz (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar
Hall, A. R., Henry More: magic, religion and experiment (Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar
Hall, A. R., All was light: an introduction to Newton’s Opticks (Oxford, 1993).Google Scholar
Hall, B., ‘Calvin against the Calvinists’, in John Calvin, ed. Duffield, G. (Grand Rapids, 1966), 19–37.Google Scholar
Halleux, R., ‘La controverse sur les origines de la chimie, de Paracelse à Borrichius’, in Acta Conventus neo-Latini Turonensis, ed. Margolin, J. C., 2 vols (Paris, 1980), ii.807–19.Google Scholar
Hamou, P., ‘Physics in the broad sense: Boyle, Newton, and the Baconian metaphysical physics’, in Physics and metaphysics in Descartes and his reception, ed. Antoine-Mahut, D. and Roux, S. (New York, 2018), 188–212.Google Scholar
Hampton, S., Anti-Arminians: the Anglican Reformed tradition from Charles II to George I (Oxford, 2008).Google Scholar
Hampton, S., ‘Samuel Ward and the defense of Dordt in England’, in Beyond Dordt and De auxiliis, ed. Ballor, J. et al. (Leiden, 2019), 200–18.Google Scholar
Hankins, J. and Palmer, A., The recovery of ancient philosophy in the Renaissance: a brief guide (Florence, 2008).Google Scholar
Hankins, T., ‘The influence of Malebranche on the science of mechanics during the eighteenth century’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 28 (1967), 193–210.Google Scholar
Hankins, T., Jean d’Alembert: science and the Enlightenment (Oxford, 1970).Google Scholar
Hardy, N., Criticism and confession: the Bible in the seventeenth century republic of letters (Oxford, 2017).Google Scholar
Harent, S., ‘Infidèles (Salut des)’, Dictionnaire de théologie catholique, 15 vols (1899–1950), vii.1726–1930.Google Scholar
Harmening, D., Superstitio: überlieferungs- und theoriegeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur kirchlich-theologischen Aberglaubensliteratur des Mittelalters (Berlin, 1979).Google Scholar
Harper, W. L., Isaac Newton’s scientific method (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Harper, W. L. and Smith, G. E., ‘Newton’s new way of inquiry’, in The creation of ideas in physics, ed. Leplin, J. (Dordrecht, 1996), 113–66.Google Scholar
Hattab, H., ‘From mechanics to mechanism: the Quaestiones mechanicae and Descartes’ physics’, in The science of nature in the seventeenth century, ed. Anstey, P. and Schuster, J. A. (Dordrecht, 2005), 99–129.Google Scholar
Hattab, H., Descartes on forms and mechanisms (Cambridge, 2009).Google Scholar
Hattab, H., ‘Suárez’s last stand for the substantial form’, in The philosophy of Francisco Suárez, ed. Hill, B. and Lagerlund, H. (Oxford, 2012), 101–18.Google Scholar
Hazard, P., La crise de la conscience européenne (Paris, 1935).Google Scholar
Hazard, P., The European mind, 1680–1715 (New York, 1953).Google Scholar
Heering, J. P., Hugo Grotius as apologist for the Christian religion: a study of his work De veritate religionis christianae (1640) (Leiden, 2004).Google Scholar
Heilbron, J., Electricity in the 17th and 18th centuries (Berkeley, 1979).Google Scholar
Heilbron, J. L., Weighing imponderables and other quantitative science around 1800 (Berkeley, 1993).Google Scholar
Helbing, M. O., ‘Mechanics and natural philosophy in late 16th-century Pisa: Cesalpino and Buonamici, humanist masters of the Faculty of Arts’, in Mechanics and natural philosophy before the scientific revolution, ed. Laird, W. R. and Roux, S. (Dordrecht, 2008), 185–93.Google Scholar
Hellyer, M., Catholic physics: Jesuit natural philosophy in early modern Germany (Notre Dame, 2005).Google Scholar
Hengst, K., Jesuiten an Universitäten und Jesuitenuniversitäten (Paderborn, 1981).Google Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Francesco Patrizi da Cherso’s concept of space and its later influence’, Annals of Science, 36 (1979), 549–73.Google Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Occult qualities and the experimental philosophy: active principles in pre-Newtonian matter theory’, History of Science, 24 (1986), 335–81.Google Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Robert Hooke, the incongruous mechanist’, in Robert Hooke: new studies, ed. Hunter, M. and Schaffer, S. (Woodbridge, 1989), 149–80.Google Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Henry More versus Robert Boyle: the spirit of nature and the nature of providence’, in Henry More: tercentenary studies, ed. Hutton, S. (Dordrecht, 1990), 55–76.Google Scholar
Henry, J., ‘“Pray do not ascribe that notion to me”: God and Newton’s gravity’, in The books of nature and Scripture, ed. Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1994), 123–47.Google Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Isaac Newton and the problem of action at a distance’, Krisis, 8 (1999), 30–46.Google Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Keill, John’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Metaphysics and the origin of modern science: Descartes and the importance of laws of nature’, Early Science and Medicine, 9 (2004), 73–114.Google Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Gravity and “De gravitatione”: the development of Newton’s ideas on action at a distance’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42 (2011), 11–27.Google Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Newton and action at a distance between bodies: a response to Andrew Janiak’s “Three concepts of causation in Newton”’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 47 (2014), 91–7.Google Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Primary and secondary causation in Samuel Clarke’s and Isaac Newton’s theories of gravity’, ISIS, 111 (2020), 542–61.Google Scholar
Henry, J. and McGuire, J. E., ‘Voluntarism and panentheism: the sensorium of God and Isaac Newton’s theology’, The Seventeenth Century, 33 (2018), 587–612.Google Scholar
Hentrich, W., ‘Gregor von Valencia und die Erneuerung der deutschen Scholastik im 16. Jahrhundert’, in Philosophia perennis, ed. von Rintellen, F. (Regensburg, 1930), 293–307.Google Scholar
Hentschel, K., ‘Fruitful misinterpretations: Mach and Einstein on Newton’, in The reception of Isaac Newton in Europe, ed. Pulte, H. and Mandelbrote, S., 2 vols (London, 2019), ii.931–40.Google Scholar
Herivel, J., The background to Newton’s Principia: a study of Newton’s dynamical researches in the years 1664–84 (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar
Heyd, M., ‘From a rationalist theology to Cartesian voluntarism: David Derodon and Jean-Robert Chouet’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 40 (1979), 527–42.Google Scholar
Heyd, M., Between orthodoxy and the enlightenment: Jean-Robert Chouet and the introduction of Cartesian science in the Academy of Geneva (The Hague, 1982).Google Scholar
Hickson, M. W., ‘Reductio ad malum: Bayle’s early skepticism about theodicy’, The Modern Schoolman, 88 (2011), 201–21.Google Scholar
Hickson, M. W., ‘Theodicy and toleration in Bayle’s Dictionary’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 51 (2013), 49–73.Google Scholar
Hickson, M. W., ‘Belief and invincible objections: Bayle, Le Clerc, Leibniz’, in Leibniz et Bayle: confrontation et dialogue, ed. Leduc, C., Rateau, P., and Solère, J.-L. (Stuttgart, 2015), 69–86.Google Scholar
Hickson, M. W., ‘Introduction’, in Bayle, Pierre, Dialogues of Maximus and Themistius, ed. and trans. Hickson, M. W. (Leiden, 2016).Google Scholar
Hickson, M. W., ‘Disagreement and Academic scepticism in Bayle’, in Academic scepticism in the development of early modern philosophy, ed. Junqueira Smith, P. and Charles, S. (Leiden, 2017), 293–317.Google Scholar
Hickson, M. W., ‘Varieties of modern Academic scepticism: Pierre-Daniel Huet and Simon Foucher’, in Skepticism: from antiquity to the present, ed. Machuca, D. E. and Reed, B. (London, 2018), 320–41.Google Scholar
Hickson, M. W. and Lennon, T. M., ‘The real significance of Bayle’s authorship of the Avis’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17 (2009), 191–205.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, S. M., The Trinitarian theology of Basil of Caesarea: a synthesis of Greek thought and biblical truth (Washington, DC, 2007).Google Scholar
Hill, K., ‘Neither ancient nor modern: Wallis and Barrow on the composition of continua. Part one: mathematical styles and the composition of continua’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 50 (1996), 165–78.Google Scholar
Hirai, H., Le concept de semence dans les théories de la matière à la Renaissance: de Marsile Ficin à Pierre Gassendi (Turnhout, 2005).Google Scholar
Hirai, H., Medical humanism and natural philosophy: Renaissance debates on matter, life and the soul (Leiden, 2011).Google Scholar
Hirai, H., ‘Living atoms, hylomorphism and spontaneous generation in Daniel Sennert’, in Matter and form in early modern science and philosophy, ed. Manning, G. (Leiden, 2012), 77–98.Google Scholar
Hirai, H., ‘Mysteries of living corpuscles: atomism and the origin of life in Sennert, Gassendi and Kircher’, in Early modern medicine and natural philosophy, ed. Distelzweig, P. et al. (Dordrecht, 2016), 255–69.Google Scholar
Hiscock, W. G., ed., David Gregory, Isaac Newton and their circle (Oxford, 1937).Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, T., Natural law theories in the early enlightenment (Cambridge, 2000).Google Scholar
Hoenen, M. J. F. M., ‘Via antiqua and via moderna in the fifteenth century: doctrinal, institutional, and church political factors in the Wegestreit’, in The medieval heritage in early modern metaphysics and modal theory, 1400–1700, ed. Friedman, R. L. and Nielsen, L. O. (Dordrecht, 2003), 9–36.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T., ‘Dimensionen des Erkenntnisproblems bei Girolamo Fracastoro: ein Beitrag zur Fortentwicklung der aristotelischen Gnoseologie in der italienischen Renaissance’, Vivarium, 41 (2003), 144–74.Google Scholar
Hofmann, M., Theologie, Dogma und Dogmenentwicklung im theologischen Werk Denis Petau’s (Munich, 1976).Google Scholar
Hooykaas, R., Selected studies in history of science (Coimbra, 1983).Google Scholar
Horst, P. W. van der, ‘The omen of sneezing’, Ancient Society, 43 (2013), 213–21.Google Scholar
Hoskin, M. A., ‘“Mining all within”: Clarke’s notes to Rohault’s Traité de physique’, The Thomist, 24 (1961), 353–63.Google Scholar
Hotson, H., The reformation of common learning (Oxford, 2020).Google Scholar
Howard, T. A., Protestant theology and the making of the modern German university (Oxford, 2006).Google Scholar
Howells, R. J., Pierre Jurieu: antinomian radical (Durham, 1983).Google Scholar
Hunter, I., Rival enlightenments: civil and metaphysical philosophy in early modern Germany (Cambridge, 2001).Google Scholar
Hunter, M., Robert Boyle, 1627–91: scrupulosity and science (Woodbridge, 2000).Google Scholar
Hunter, M., ‘Boyle and the early Royal Society: a reciprocal exchange in the making of Baconian science’, British Journal for the History of Science, 40 (2007), 1–23.Google Scholar
Hunter, M., Boyle: between God and science (New Haven, 2009).Google Scholar
Hunter, M., The decline of magic: Britain in the enlightenment (New Haven, 2020).Google Scholar
Huron, H., ‘Un probabiliste disciple de Malebranche: Pierre Rémond de Montmort (1678–1719)’, Annales de la faculté des sciences de Toulouse, 5 (1980), 1–31.Google Scholar
Iliffe, R., Priest of nature: the religious worlds of Isaac Newton (New York, 2017).Google Scholar
Iltis, C., ‘Leibniz and the vis viva controversy’, Isis, 62 (1971), 21–35.Google Scholar
Inglis, J., Spheres of philosophical inquiry and the historiography of medieval philosophy (Leiden, 1998).Google Scholar
Insole, C., ‘Kant’s transcendental idealism and Newton’s divine sensorium’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 72 (2011), 413–36.Google Scholar
Irwin, K., ‘Bayle on the (ir)rationality of religious belief’, Philosophy Compass, 8 (2013), 560–9.Google Scholar
Irwin, K., ‘Which “reason”? Bayle on the intractability of evil’, in New essays on Leibniz’s Theodicy, ed. Jorgensen, L. M. and Newlands, S. (Oxford, 2014), 43–54.Google Scholar
Irwin, K., ‘The implications of Bayle’s qualified Academic scepticism for moral knowledge’, in Academic scepticism in the development of early modern philosophy, ed. Junqueira Smith, P. and Charles, S. (Leiden, 2017), 275–92.Google Scholar
Israel, J. I., The Dutch republic: its rise, greatness, and fall, 1477–1806 (Oxford, 1998).Google Scholar
Israel, J. I., Radical enlightenment: philosophy and the making of modernity, 1650–1750 (Oxford, 2002).Google Scholar
Israel, J. I., Enlightenment contested: philosophy, modernity, and the emancipation of man, 1670–1752 (Oxford, 2006).Google Scholar
Israel, J. I., ‘Pierre Bayle’s correspondence and its significance for the history of ideas’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 80 (2019), 479–500.Google Scholar
Jalobeanu, D., ‘The Cartesians of the Royal Society: the debate over collisions and the nature of body (1668–1670)’, in Vanishing matter and the laws of motion: Descartes and beyond, ed. Jalobeanu, D. and Anstey, P. R. (New York, 2011), 103–29.Google Scholar
Jalobeanu, D., ‘Constructing natural historical facts: Baconian natural history in Newton’s first paper on light and colours’, in Newton and empiricism, ed. Biener, Z. and Schliesser, E. (Oxford, 2014), 39–65.Google Scholar
James, E. D., ‘The problem of sufficient grace and the Lettres provinciales’, French Studies, 21 (1967), 205–19.Google Scholar
James, E. D., ‘Pierre Bayle and the rejection of “La voie d’examen”’, French Studies Bulletin, 31 (2010), 76–8.Google Scholar
Janiak, A., ‘Newton and the reality of force’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45 (2007), 127–47.Google Scholar
Janiak, A., Newton as philosopher (Cambridge, 2008).Google Scholar
Janiak, A., ‘Isaac Newton’, in The Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the seventeenth century, ed. Anstey, P. (Oxford, 2012), 96–115.Google Scholar
Janiak, A., ‘Introduction’, in Newton, Isaac, Philosophical Writings, ed. Janiak, A. (2nd ed., Cambridge, 2014).Google Scholar
Janiak, A., Newton (Chichester, 2015).Google Scholar
Jenkins, J., Knowledge and faith in Thomas Aquinas (Cambridge, 1997).Google Scholar
Jenkinson, S., ‘Introduction’, in Bayle, Pierre, Political writings, ed. Jenkinson, S. (Cambridge, 2000).Google Scholar
Jensen, K., ‘Protestant rivalry: metaphysics and rhetoric in Germany c.1590–1620’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 41 (1990).Google Scholar
Jesseph, D., ‘Hobbesian mechanics’, in Oxford studies in early modern philosophy, vol. III, ed. Garber, D. and Nadler, S. (Oxford, 2006), 119–52.Google Scholar
Jolland, M. and Mandelbrote, S., ‘Isaac Newton learns Hebrew: Samuel Johnson’s Nova cubi Hebræi tabella’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 70 (2016), 9–21.Google Scholar
Joly, B., ‘Les références à la philosophie antique dans les débats sur l’alchimie au début du XVIIe siècle’, in Alchimie: art, histoire et mythes, ed. Kahn, D. and Matton, S. (Paris, 1995), 671–90.Google Scholar
Jones, A., ‘Decompiling Dapper: a preliminary search for evidence’, History in Africa, 17 (1990), 171–209.Google Scholar
Jones, J.-E., ‘Boyle, classification and the Workmanship of the understanding thesis’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 43 (2005), 171–83.Google Scholar
Jones, J.-E., ‘Locke vs Boyle: the real essence of corpuscular species’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 15 (2007), 659–84.Google Scholar
Jonge, H. J. de, ‘The study of the New Testament’, in Leiden University in the seventeenth century, ed. Lunsingh Scheurleer, T. H. and Posthumus Meyjes, G. H. M. (Leiden, 1975), 64–109.Google Scholar
Jordan, R., ‘Tylden, Thomas’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Jorink, E., ‘Comets in context: some thoughts on Bayle’s Pensées diverses’, in Pierre Bayle (1647–1706): le philosophe de Rotterdam, ed. van Bunge, W. and Bots, H. (Leiden, 2008), 35–50.Google Scholar
Jossua, J.-P., Pierre Bayle ou l’obsession du mal (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar
Joy, L., Gassendi the atomist (Cambridge, 1987).Google Scholar
Jue, J. K., Heaven upon earth: Joseph Mede (1586–1638) and the legacy of millenarianism (Dordrecht, 2006).Google Scholar
Kahn, D., ‘La Faculté de Médecine de Paris en échec face au Paracelsisme: enjeux et dénouement réels du procès de Roch Le Baillif’, in Paracelsus und seine internationale Rezeption in der Frühen Neuzeit, ed. Schott, H. and Zinguer, I. (Leiden, 1988), 146–221.Google Scholar
Kahn, D., Alchimie et Paracelsisme en France (1567–1625) (Geneva, 2007).Google Scholar
Kan, J. B., ‘De Illustre School te Rotterdam’, Rotterdamsch Jaarboekje, 1 (1888), 1–96.Google Scholar
Karrer, L., Die historisch-positive Methode des Theologen Dionysius Petavius (Munich, 1970).Google Scholar
Kassler, J. A., Seeking truth: Roger North’s notes on Newton and correspondence with Samuel Clarke c.1704–1713 (Farnham, 2014).Google Scholar
Kassler, J. A., Newton’s sensorium: anatomy of a concept (Cham, 2018).Google Scholar
Kaufmann, M. and Aichele, A., ed., A companion to Luis de Molina (Leiden, 2014).Google Scholar
Kemeny, M., ‘What motion is: William Neile and the laws of motion’, Annals of Science, 74 (2017), 179–91.Google Scholar
Keßler, E., ‘Physik oder Metaphysik? Zum Begriff einer Wissenschaft von der Natur in der Methodendiskussion der “Schule von Padua” im beginnenden 16. Jahrhundert’, in Aristotelica et Lulliana magistro doctissimo Charles H. Lohr septuagesimum annum feliciter agenti dedicata, ed. Domínguez Reboiras, F. et al. (Turnhout, 1995), 223–44.Google Scholar
Keßler, E., ‘Metaphysics or empirical science? The two faces of Aristotelian natural philosophy in the sixteenth century’, in Renaissance readings of the Corpus Aristotelicum, ed. Pade, M. (Copenhagen, 2001), 79–102.Google Scholar
Keßler, E., ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias and his doctrine of the soul: 1400 years of lasting significance’, Early Science and Medicine, 16 (2011), 1–93.Google Scholar
Kilcullen, J., Sincerity and truth: essays on Arnauld, Bayle, and toleration (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Kim, S., Strange names of God: the missionary translation of the divine name and the Chinese responses to Matteo Ricci’s Shang-ti in Late Ming China, 1583–1644 (New York, 2004).Google Scholar
Kirsanov, V. S., ‘The earliest copy in Russia of Newton’s Principia: is it David Gregory’s annotated copy?’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 46 (1992), 203–18.Google Scholar
Klauber, M. I., Between Reformed scholasticism and pan-Protestantism: Jean-Alphonse Turretin (1671–1737) and enlightened orthodoxy at the Academy of Geneva (Selinsgrove, 1994).Google Scholar
Klemme, H., ‘Substances and modes, space and time’, in The Cambridge history of eighteenth-century philosophy, ed. Haakonssen, K. (Cambridge, 2006), 343–67.Google Scholar
Klempa, W., ‘John Calvin on natural law’, in John Calvin and the Church: a prism of Reform, ed. George, T. (Louisville, KY, 1990), 1–24.Google Scholar
Knebel, S. K., ‘Scientia Media: ein diskursarchäologischer Leitfaden durch das 17. Jahrhundert’, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 34 (1991), 262–94.Google Scholar
Knetsch, F. R. J., Pierre Jurieu: theoloog en politikus der Refuge (Kampen, 1967).Google Scholar
Knetsch, F. R. J., ‘Jurieu, Bayle et Paets’, Bulletin de la Société de l’histoire du protestantisme français, 117 (1971), 38–61.Google Scholar
Knetsch, F. R. J., ‘Un contributo alla bibliografia di Pierre Jurieu (1637–1713)’, Rivista di storia e letteratura religiosa, 9 (1973), 457–76.Google Scholar
Knoeff, R., ‘The reins of the soul: the centrality of the intercostal nerves to the neurology of Thomas Willis and to Samuel Parker’s theology’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 59 (2004), 413–40.Google Scholar
Knoespel, K., ‘Interpretative strategies in Newton’s Theologiae gentilis origines philosophiae’, in Newton and religion, ed. Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1999), 179–202.Google Scholar
Knowles Middleton, W. E., The experimenters (Baltimore, 1971).Google Scholar
Knuttel, W. P. C., Balthasar Bekker: de bestrijder van het bijgeloof (The Hague, 1906).Google Scholar
Kochiras, H., ‘Gravity and Newton’s substance counting problem’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 40 (2009), 267–80.Google Scholar
Kochiras, H., ‘Gravity’s cause and substance counting: contextualizing the problems’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42 (2011), 167–84.Google Scholar
Kochiras, H., ‘By ye divine arm: God and substance in De gravitatione’, Religious Studies, 49 (2013), 327–56.Google Scholar
Kolb, R., ‘Teaching the text: the commonplace method in sixteenth century Lutheran biblical commentary’, Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance, 49 (1987), 571–85.Google Scholar
Kollerstrom, N., ‘The path of Halley’s Comet, and Newton’s late apprehension of the law of gravity’, Annals of Science, 45 (1999), 331–56.Google Scholar
Kondylis, P., Die neuzeitliche Metaphysikkritik (Stuttgart, 1990).Google Scholar
Kors, A., Atheism in France, 1650–1729 (Princeton, 1990).Google Scholar
Koyré, A., Newtonian studies (London, 1965).Google Scholar
Koyré, A., Metaphysics and measurement (Cambridge, MA, 1968).Google Scholar
Koyré, A. and Cohen, I. B., ‘The case of the missing tanquam: Leibniz, Newton and Clarke’, ISIS, 52 (1961), 555–66.Google Scholar
Krayer, A., Mathematik im Studienplan der Jesuiten: Die Vorlesungen von Otto Catenius an der Universität Mainz 1610/11 (Stuttgart, 1991).Google Scholar
Kreimendahl, L., ‘Das Theodizeeproblem und Bayles fideistischer Lösungsversuch’, in Scepticism and irreligion in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, ed. Popkin, R. H. and Vanderjagt, A. (Leiden, 1993), 282–305.Google Scholar
Kremer, E., ‘Grace and free will in Arnauld’, in The great Arnauld and some of his philosophical correspondents, ed. Kremer, E. (Toronto, 1994), 219–39.Google Scholar
Kremer, E. J., ‘Arnauld’s interpretation of Descartes as a Christian philosopher’, in Interpreting Arnauld, ed. Kremer, E. J. (Toronto, 1996), 76–90.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P., Le Thomisme et la pensée italienne de la Renaissance (Montreal, 1967).Google Scholar
Krop, H. A., ‘Philosophy and the Synod of Dordt: Aristotelianism, humanism, and the case against Arminianism’, in Revisiting the Synod of Dordt (1618–19), ed. Goudriaan, A. and van Lieburg, F. (Leiden, 2010), 49–79.Google Scholar
Krumenacker, Y., ‘Can we give the gospel to those who have not heard of it? Reformed theological discourses about the salvation of the pagans in the early modern era’, Bažnyčios Istorijos Studijos, 6 (2013), 55–69.Google Scholar
Kubbinga, H. H., ‘Les premières théories “moléculaires”: Isaac Beeckmaan (1620) et Sébastien Basson (1621). Le concept d’individu substantiel et d’espèce substantielle’, Revue d’histoire des sciences, 37 (1984), 215–33.Google Scholar
Kubbinga, H. H., ‘La théorie moléculaire chez Gassendi’, in Quadricentenaire de la naissance de Gassendi, 2 vols (Digne, 1994), ii.283–302.Google Scholar
Kubrin, D., ‘Newton and the cyclical cosmos: providence and the mechanical philosophy’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 28 (1967), 325–46.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T., The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. (Chicago, 1970).Google Scholar
Kusukawa, S., The transformation of natural philosophy: the case of Philip Melanchthon (Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar
Kusukawa, S., ‘Lutheran uses of Aristotle: a comparison between Jacob Schegk and Philip Melanchthon’, in Philosophy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, ed. Blackwell, C. and Kusukawa, S. (Aldershot, 1999), 169–88.Google Scholar
Kynaston-Snell, H. F., Jean Baudoin et les Essais de Bacon en France, jusqu’au XVIIIe siècle (Paris, 1939).Google Scholar
Labrousse, E., Pierre Bayle, 2 vols (The Hague, 1963–4).Google Scholar
Labrousse, E., ‘La tolérance comme argument de controverse: les Nouvelles lettres de Pierre Bayle’, Studies in 18th-Century Culture, 4 (1975), 247–52.Google Scholar
Labrousse, E., ‘The political ideas of the Huguenot Diaspora (Bayle and Jurieu)’, in Church, state, and society under the Bourbon Kings of France, ed. Golden, R. M. (Lawrence, KS, 1982), 222–83.Google Scholar
Labrousse, E., ‘Une foi, une loi, un roi?’ Essai sur la révocation de l’Edit de Nantes (Geneva, 1985).Google Scholar
Labrousse, E., ‘Reading Pierre Bayle in Paris’, in Anticipation of the enlightenment in England, France, and Germany, ed. Kors, A. C. and Korshin, P. J. (Philadelphia, 1987), 7–16.Google Scholar
Labrousse, E., Conscience et conviction: Etudes sur le XVIIe siècle (Paris, 1996), 159–75.Google Scholar
Lach, D. F. and Van Kley, E. J., Asia in the making of Europe, vol. III: A century of advance, i: Trade, missions, literature (Chicago, 1993).Google Scholar
Laerke, M., ‘Sticking to the middle course: intellectual ethics and scientific practice in Leibniz’s metaphysical physics’, in Physics and metaphysics in Descartes and in his reception, ed. Antoine-Mahut, D. and Roux, S. (New York, 2018), 247–62.Google Scholar
Laeven, H., The ‘Acta eruditorum’ under the editorship of Otto Mencke: the history of an international learned journal between 1682 and 1707, trans. Richards, L. (Amsterdam and Maarssen, 1990).Google Scholar
Laird, W. R., ‘The scientiae mediae in medieval commentaries on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics’. PhD thesis, University of Toronto (1983).Google Scholar
Laird, W. R., ‘Galileo and the mixed sciences’, in Method and order in Renaissance philosophy of nature, ed. Di Liscia, D. et al. (Ashgate, 1997), 252–70.Google Scholar
Laird, W. R., ‘Introduction’, in The unfinished mechanics of Giuseppe Moletti, ed. and trans. Laird, W. R. (Toronto, 2000).Google Scholar
Laird, W. R., ‘Hero of Alexandria and Renaissance mechanics’, in Mathematical practitioners and the transformation of natural knowledge in early modern Europe, ed. Cormack, L. B. et al. (Dordrecht, 2017), 149–65.Google Scholar
Lamalle, E., ‘La propagande du P. Nicolas Trigault en faveur des missions de Chine (1616)’, Archivum historicum Societatis Iesu, 9 (1940), 49–120.Google Scholar
Lamanna, M., ‘Sulla prima occorrenza del termine “Ontologia”: una nota bibliografica’, Quaestio, 6 (2006), 557–70.Google Scholar
Lamanna, M., ‘Mathematics, abstraction and ontology: Benet Perera and the impossibility of a neutral science of reality’, Quaestio, 14 (2014), 69–89.Google Scholar
Lamanna, M., ‘Benet Perera: the epistemological question at the heart of early Jesuit philosophy’, in Jesuit philosophy on the eve of modernity, ed. Casalini, C. (Leiden, 2019), 270–94.Google Scholar
Landucci, S., I filosofi e i selvaggi (Florence, 1972).Google Scholar
Lang, H. S., Aristotle’s physics and its medieval varieties (Albany, NY, 1992).Google Scholar
Lankhorst, O. S., Reiner Leers (1654–1714): uitgever en boekverkoper te Rotterdam (Amsterdam, 1983).Google Scholar
Laplanche, F., L’évidence du Dieu chrétien: religion, culture et société dans l’apologétique protestante de la France classique (1576–1670) (Strasbourg, 1983).Google Scholar
Laplanche, F., L’écriture, le sacré et l’histoire: érudits et politiques protestants devant la Bible en France au XVIIe siècle (Amsterdam, 1986).Google Scholar
Laplanche, F., ‘L’enseignement de l’Ecriture Sainte dans les universités catholiques à l’âge moderne’, in Université, église, culture: l’université catholique à l’époque moderne, ed. Hurtubise, P. (Paris, 2005), 327–402.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. D. and Molland, A. G., ‘David Gregory’s inaugural lecture at Oxford’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 25 (1970), 143–78.Google Scholar
Le Bachelet, X.-M., Prédestination et grâce efficace: controverses dans la Compagnie de Jésus au temps d’Aquaviva, 1610–1613, 2 vols (Louvain, 1931).Google Scholar
Lea, H. C., ‘Philosophical sin’, International Journal of Ethics, 5 (1895), 324–39.Google Scholar
Lebrun, F., ‘Le “Traité des superstitions” de Jean-Baptiste Thiers: contribution à l’ethnographie de la France du XVIIe siècle’, Annales de Bretagne et des pays de l’Ouest, 83 (1976), 443–65.Google Scholar
Leduc, C., ‘La métaphysique de la nature à l’Académie de Berlin’, Philosophiques, 42 (2015), 11–30.Google Scholar
Lee, H. J., The biblical accommodation debate in Germany: interpretation and the enlightenment (Cham, 2017).Google Scholar
Leewenburgh, B., ‘Pierre Bayle in Dutch politics (1682–1693)’, Libertinage et philosophie au XVIIe siècle, 8 (2004), 91–114.Google Scholar
Legros, A., ‘Plutarque, Amyot, Montaigne et la “superstition”’, in Moralia et œuvres morales à la Renaissance, ed. Guerrier, O. (Paris, 2008), 275–92.Google Scholar
Lehmann-Brauns, S., Weisheit in der Weltgeschichte: Philosophiegeschichte zwischen Barock und Aufklärung (Tübingen, 2004).Google Scholar
Leijenhorst, C., The mechanisation of Aristotelianism: the late scholastic setting of Thomas Hobbes’ natural philosophy (Leiden, 2002).Google Scholar
Leinsle, U., Das Ding unde die Methode: methodische Konstitution und Gegenstand der frühen protestantischen Metaphysik, 2 vols (Augsburg, 1985).Google Scholar
Leinsle, U. G., Introduction to scholastic theology, trans. Miller, M. J. (Washington, DC, 2010).Google Scholar
Leinsle, U. G., ‘Der Widerstand gegen Perera und seine Physik in der oberdeutschen Jesuitenprovinz’, Quaestio, 14 (2014), 51–68.Google Scholar
Lennon, T. M., ‘Mechanism as a silly mouse’, in Causation in early modern philosophy, ed. Nadler, S. (University Park, PA, 1993), 179–95.Google Scholar
Lennon, T. M., The battle of the gods and giants (Princeton, 1993).Google Scholar
Lennon, T. M., ‘Bayle, Locke, and the metaphysics of toleration’, in Studies in seventeenth-century European philosophy, ed. Stewart, M. A. (Oxford, 1997), 177–95.Google Scholar
Lennon, T. M., Reading Bayle (Toronto, 1999).Google Scholar
Lennon, T. M., ‘Cudworth and Bayle: an odd couple?’, in The Achilles of rationalist psychology, ed. Lennon, T. M. and Stainton, R. J. (Dordrecht, 2008), 139–58.Google Scholar
Lennon, T. M., The plain truth: Descartes, Huet, and skepticism (Leiden, 2008).Google Scholar
Lennon, T. M., ‘Descartes’s supposed libertarianism: Letter to Mesland or Memorandum concerning Petau?’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 51 (2013), 223–48.Google Scholar
Lennon, T. M., ‘No, Descartes is not a libertarian’, Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 7 (2015), 47–82.Google Scholar
Lennox, J., ‘The comparative study of animal development: William Harvey’s Aristotelianism’, in The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy, ed. Smith, J. (Cambridge, 2006), 21–46.Google Scholar
Lenoble, R., Mersenne ou la naissance du mécanisme (Paris, 1943).Google Scholar
Lesch, K. J., Neuorientierung der Theologie im 18. Jahrhundert in Würzburg und Bamberg (Würzburg, 1978).Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘From sacred history to the history of religion: paganism, Judaism, and Christianity in European historiography from Reformation to “enlightenment”’, Historical Journal, 55 (2012), 1117–60.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Halley and the eternity of the world revisited’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 67 (2013), 315–29.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘John Spencer’s De legibus Hebraeorum and “enlightened” sacred history: a new interpretation’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 76 (2013), 49–92.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Rethinking English physico-theology: Samuel Parker’s Tentamina de Deo (1665)’, Early Science and Medicine, 19 (2014), 28–75.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘The experimentalist as humanist: Robert Boyle on the history of philosophy’, Annals of Science, 71 (2014), 149–82.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Egyptology, the limits of antiquarianism, and the origins of conjectural history, c.1680–1740: new sources and perspectives’, History of European Ideas, 41 (2015), 699–727.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., Ancient wisdom in the age of the new science (Cambridge, 2015).Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Newton and scholastic philosophy’, British Journal for the History of Science, 49 (2016), 53–77.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘What was comparative religion in seventeenth-century Europe?’, in Regimes of comparatism, ed. Gagné, R., Goldhill, S., and Lloyd, G. (Leiden, 2018), 49–115.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Confessionalisation and erudition in early modern Europe: a comparative overview of a neglected episode in the history of the humanities’, in Confessionalisation and erudition in early modern Europe, ed. Hardy, N. and Levitin, D. (Oxford, 2019), 1–115.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Early modern experimental philosophy: a non-Anglocentric overview’, in Experiment, speculation and religion in early modern philosophy, ed. Vanzo, A. and Anstey, P. (New York, 2019), 229–91.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Newton on the Rules of Philosophising and hypotheses: new evidence, new conclusions’, ISIS, 112 (2021), 242–65.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘European scholarship on the formation of the New Testament Canon, c.1700: polemic, erudition, emulation’, in The worlds of knowledge and the classical tradition in early modern Europe: comparative perspectives, ed. Levitin, D. and Maclean, I. (Leiden, 2021), 366–433.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘The uses of ancient philosophy’, in The Cambridge history of the philosophy of the scientific revolution, ed. Miller, D. and Jalobeanu, D. (Cambridge, 2022).Google Scholar
Levitin, D. and Mandelbrote, S., ‘Becoming heterodox in 17th-century Cambridge: the case of Isaac Newton’, in Confessionalisation and erudition in early modern Europe, ed. Hardy, N. and Levitin, D. (Oxford, 2019), 301–71.Google Scholar
Lewis, R., Language, mind and nature: artificial languages in England from Bacon to Locke (Cambridge, 2007).Google Scholar
Lieshout, H. H. M. van, The making of Pierre Bayle’s Dictionnaire historique et critique (Amsterdam, 2001).Google Scholar
Lieshout, H. H. M. van, ‘Traces of Pierre Bayle’s philosophy teachings: with the components for an amended version of Bayle’s metaphysics as an appendix’, Lias, 29 (2002), 215–38.Google Scholar
Lindberg, D. C., ‘The genesis of Kepler’s theory of light: light metaphysics from Plotinus to Kepler’, Osiris, 2 (1986), 5–42.Google Scholar
Livesey, S. J., ‘William of Ockham, the subalternate sciences and Aristotle’s theory of “metabasis”’, British Journal for the History of Science, 19 (1985), 127–45.Google Scholar
Lohr, C., ‘Metaphysics’ (1988), in The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy, ed. Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q. (Cambridge, 1988), 535–638.Google Scholar
Lohr, C., ‘The sixteenth-century transformation of the Aristotelian natural philosophy’, in Aristotelismus und Renaissance, ed. Keßler, E. et al. (Wiesbaden, 1988), 89–99.Google Scholar
Lohr, C., ‘The sixteenth-century transformation of the Aristotelian division of the speculative sciences’, in The shapes of knowledge from the Renaissance to the enlightenment, ed. Kelley, D. R. and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1991), 49–58.Google Scholar
LoLordo, A., ‘The activity of matter in Gassendi’s physics’, in Oxford studies in early modern philosophy, vol. II, ed. Garber, D. and Nadler, S. (Oxford, 2005), 75–104.Google Scholar
Lolordo, A., Pierre Gassendi and the birth of early modern philosophy (Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar
Lugt, M. van der, Bayle, Jurieu, and the Dictionnaire historique et critique (Oxford, 2016).Google Scholar
Lundbaek, K., ‘The image of Neo-Confucianism in Confucius Sinarum philosophus’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 44 (1983), 19–30.Google Scholar
Lundbaek, K., ‘Joseph Prémare and the name of God in China’, in The Chinese Rites controversy: its history and meaning, ed. Mungello, D. E. (Nettetal, 1994), 129–49.Google Scholar
Lüthy, C., ‘Thoughts and circumstances of Sébastien Basson: analysis, micro-history, questions’, Early Science and Medicine, 2 (1997), 1–73.Google Scholar
Lüthy, C., ‘The fourfold Democritus on the stage of early modern science’, ISIS, 91 (2000), 443–79.Google Scholar
Lüthy, C., David Gorlæus (1591–1612): an enigmatic figure in the history of philosophy and science (Amsterdam, 2012).Google Scholar
Lüthy, C., ‘The metaphysical roots of physics, and the alleged link between Taurellus, Gorlaeus, Regius, and Descartes’, in Physics and metaphysics in Descartes and in his reception, ed. Antoine-Mahut, D. and Roux, S. (New York, 2019), 85–112.Google Scholar
Maag, K., Seminary or university? The Genevan Academy and Reformed higher education (Aldershot, 1995).Google Scholar
MacGregor, K. R., Luis de Molina: the life and theology of the founder of middle knowledge (Grand Rapids, 2015).Google Scholar
Mach, E., Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung, historisch-kritisch dargestellt, 8th ed. (Leipzig, 1921).Google Scholar
Maclean, I., Logic, signs and nature in the Renaissance: the case of learned medicine (Cambridge, 2002).Google Scholar
MacQueen, J. and MacQueen, W., ‘Introduction’, in Pitcairne, Archibald, The Latin poems, ed. and trans. MacQueen, J. and MacQueen, W. (Assen, 2009).Google Scholar
Magdelaine, M. et al., ed., De l’humanisme aux lumières, Bayle et le protestantisme (Oxford, 1996).Google Scholar
Mahoney, E. P., ‘Saint Thomas and the School of Padua at the end of the fifteenth century’, in Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 48 (1974), 277–85.Google Scholar
Mahoney, E. P., ‘Duns Scotus and the School of Padua around 1500’, in Sectio specialis: la tradizione scotista veneto-padovana, in Regnum hominis et regnum Dei, ed. Scapin, P. (Rome, 1978), 215–27.Google Scholar
Mahoney, M. S., ‘Barrow’s mathematics: between ancients and moderns’, in Before Newton: the life and times of Isaac Barrow, ed. Feingold, M. (Cambridge, 1991), 179–249.Google Scholar
Maia Neto, J. R., ‘Bayle’s Academic scepticism’, in Everything connects: in conference with Richard H. Popkin, ed. Force, J. E. and Katz, D. S. (Leiden, 1999), 263–76.Google Scholar
Maia Neto, J. R., ‘Huet sceptique cartésien’, Philosophiques, 35 (2008), 223–39.Google Scholar
Maier, A., An der Grenze von Scholastik und Naturwissenschaft, 2nd ed. (Rome, 1952).Google Scholar
Maier, A., Metaphysische Hintergründe der spätscholastischen Naturphilosophie (Rome, 1955).Google Scholar
Maier, A., Zwischen Philosophie und Mechanik (Rome, 1958).Google Scholar
Malcolm, N., Aspects of Hobbes (Oxford, 2002).Google Scholar
Malcolm, N., ‘General introduction’, in Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, 3 vols (Oxford, 2012), i.Google Scholar
Malet, A., ‘Isaac Barrow on the mathematization of nature: theological voluntarism and the rise of geometrical optics’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 58 (1997), 265–87.Google Scholar
Mancosu, P., ‘On the status of proofs by contradiction in the seventeenth century’, Synthese, 88 (1991), 15–41.Google Scholar
Mancosu, P., Philosophy of mathematics and mathematical practice in the seventeenth century (Oxford, 1996).Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, M., Philosophy, science, and sense perception (Baltimore, 1964).Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘Isaac Newton and Thomas Burnet: Biblical criticism and the crisis of late seventeenth-century England’, in The books of nature and Scripture, ed. Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1994), 149–78.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘The heterodox career of Nicolas Fatio de Duillier’, Heterodoxy in early modern science and religion, ed. Brooke, J. and MacLean, I. (Oxford, 2005), 263–96.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘Pierre Des Maizeaux: history, toleration, and scholarship’, in History of scholarship, ed. Quantin, J.-L. and Ligota, C. (Oxford, 2006), 385–98.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘Isaac Newton and the exegesis of the Book of Daniel’, in Die Geschichte der Daniel-Auslegung in Judentum, Christentum und Islam, ed. Bracht, K. and du Toit, D. S. (Berlin, 2007), 351–75.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘The letter of Aristeas: three phases of readership of a Jewish text’, in Jewish books and their readers, ed. Mandelbrote, S. and Weinberg, J. (Leiden, 2016), 15–44.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘Witches and forgers: Anthonie van Dale on biblical history and the authority of the Septuagint’, in Scriptural authority and biblical criticism in the Dutch Golden Age, ed. van Miert, D. et al. (Oxford, 2017), 270–306.Google Scholar
Manuel, F. E., Isaac Newton, historian (Cambridge, 1963).Google Scholar
Manuel, F. E., The religion of Isaac Newton (Oxford, 1974).Google Scholar
Marchand, S., German orientalism in the age of empire (Cambridge, 2010).Google Scholar
Martin, C., ‘Conjecture, probabilism, and provisional knowledge in Renaissance meteorology’, Early Science and Medicine, 14 (2009), 265–89.Google Scholar
Martin, C., Renaissance meteorology: Pomponazzi to Descartes (Baltimore, 2011).Google Scholar
Martin, C., Subverting Aristotle: religion, history and philosophy in early modern science (Baltimore, 2014).Google Scholar
Martin, H.-J., Livre, pouvoirs et société à Paris au XVIIe siècle, 2 vols (Geneva, 1969).Google Scholar
Mason, H. T., Pierre Bayle and Voltaire (London, 1963).Google Scholar
Massignat, C., ‘Gassendi et l’élasticité de l’air: une étape entre Pascal et la loi de Boyle–Mariotte’, Revue d’histoire des sciences, 53 (2000), 179–203.Google Scholar
Matava, R. J., Divine causality and human free choice: Domingo Báñez, physical premotion and the controversy De auxiliis revisited (Leiden, 2016).Google Scholar
Matton, S., ‘Gassendi, Mosnier, et la grande expérience du Puy de Dôme’, in Pierre Gassendi, 1592–1655 (Digne, 1994), 303–22.Google Scholar
Maurer, C., ‘Archibald Campbell and the Committee for Purity of Natural Reason, Natural Religion, and Revelation’, History of European Ideas, 42 (2016), 256–75.Google Scholar
Maurer, C., ‘Doctrinal issues concerning human nature and self-love, and the case of Archibald Campbell’s Enquiry’, Intellectual History Review, 26 (2016), 355–69.Google Scholar
McClaughlin, T., ‘Sur les rapports entre la Compagnie de Thévenot et l’Académie royale des Sciences’, Revue d’histoire des sciences, 28 (1975), 235–42.Google Scholar
McClaughlin, T., ‘Censorship and defenders of the Cartesian faith in mid-seventeenth century France’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 40 (1979), 563–81.Google Scholar
McDonald, G., Biblical criticism in early modern Europe: Erasmus, the Johannine Comma and Trinitarian debate (Cambridge, 2016).Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E., ‘Force, active principles, and Newton’s invisible realm’, Ambix, 15 (1968), 154–208.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E., ‘Newton’s “Principles of Philosophy”: an intended preface for the 1704 “Opticks” and a related draft fragment’, British Journal for the History of Science, 5 (1970), 178–86.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E., ‘Newton on place, time, and God: an unpublished source’, British Journal for the History of Science, 11 (1978), 114–29.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E. ‘Predicates of pure existence: Newton on God’s space and time’ in Philosophical perspectives on Newtonian science, ed. Bricker, P. and Hughes, R. I. G. (Cambridge, MA, 1990), 91–108.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E., Tradition and innovation: Newton’s metaphysics of nature (Dordrecht, 1995).Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E. ‘The fate of the date: the theology of Newton’s Principia revisited’, in Rethinking the scientific revolution, ed. Osler, M. J. (Cambridge, 2000), 271–95.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E., ‘A dialogue with Descartes: Newton’s ontology of true and immutable natures’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45 (2007), 103–25.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E. and Rattansi, P. M., ‘Newton and the “Pipes of Pan”’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 21 (1966), 108–43.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E. and Slowik, E., ‘Newton’s ontology of omnipresence and infinite space’, in Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. VI, ed. Garber, D. and Rutherford, D. (Oxford, 2012), 279–308.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E. and Tamny, M., ‘Introduction’, in Certain philosophical questions: Newton’s Trinity notebook, ed. McGuire, J. E. and Tamny, M. (Cambridge, 1983).Google Scholar
McKenna, A., ‘Sur L’esprit de M. Arnauld par Pierre Jurieu’, Port-Royal et les protestants, Chroniques de Port-Royal, 47 (1998), 179–238.Google Scholar
McKenna, A., ‘La norme et la transgression: Pierre Bayle et le socinianisme’, in Normes et transgression au XVIIIe siècle, ed. Dubois, P. (Paris, 2002), 117–36.Google Scholar
McKenna, A., ‘Pierre Bayle in the twentieth century’, in Bayle, philosophe de Rotterdam, ed. van Bunge, W. and Bots, H. (Leiden, 2008), 253–68.Google Scholar
McKenna, A., ‘Théologie et politique: le contexte politique de la bataille théologique entre Bayle et Jurieu’, in Espaces de la controverse au seuil des lumières, 1680–1715, ed. Burnand, L. and Paschoud, A. (Paris, 2010), 79–96.Google Scholar
McKenna, A., Etudes sur Pierre Bayle (Paris, 2015).Google Scholar
McKenna, A., ‘Pierre Bayle and the red herring’, in Reading between the lines: Leo Strauss and the history of early modern philosophy, ed. Schröder, W. (Berlin, 2015), 193–220.Google Scholar
McKenna, A., ‘Pierre Bayle historien de la philosophie: un sondage’, Lexicon philosophicum, 5 (2017), 21–59.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F., The Cambridge University Press, 1696–1712: a bibliographical study, 2 vols (Cambridge, 1966).Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. D., ‘Aristotle’s subordinate sciences’, British Journal for the History of Science, 11 (1978), 197–220.Google Scholar
McKitterick, D., A history of Cambridge University Press, 3 vols (Cambridge, 1992–2004).Google Scholar
McMullin, E., Newton on matter and activity (Notre Dame, 1978).Google Scholar
McMullin, E., ‘The impact of Newton’s Principia on the philosophy of science’, Philosophy of Science, 68 (2001), 279–310.Google Scholar
McNeill, J. T., ‘Natural law in the teaching of the Reformers’, Journal of Religion, 26 (1946), 168–82.Google Scholar
Meer, J. M. van der and Mandelbrote, S., ed., Nature and Scripture in the Abrahamic religions: up to 1700, 2 vols (Leiden, 2008).Google Scholar
Meier-Oeser, S., Die Spur des Zeichens: das Zeichen und seine Funktion in der Philosophie des Mittelalters und der Frühen Neuzeit (Berlin, 1997).Google Scholar
Melles, J., Ministers aan de Maas: geschiedenis van de Rotterdamse pensionarissen met een inleiding over het stedelijk pensionariaat, 1508–1795 (Rotterdam, 1962).Google Scholar
Mellon, P., L’Académie de Sedan, centre d’influence française, à propos d’un manuscrit du XVIIe siècle: silhouettes et croquis (Paris, 1913).Google Scholar
Menk, G., Die Hohe Schule Herborn in ihrer Frühzeit (1584–1660) (Wiesbaden, 1981).Google Scholar
Menn, S., Descartes and Augustine (Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar
Mercer, C., Leibniz’s metaphysics: its origin and development (Cambridge, 2001).Google Scholar
Michael, E., ‘Averroes and the plurality of forms’, Franciscan Studies, 52 (1992), 155–82.Google Scholar
Michael, E., ‘Daniel Sennert on matter and form: at the juncture of the old and the new’, Early Science and Medicine, 2 (1997), 272–99.Google Scholar
Michael, E., ‘Descartes and Gassendi on matter and mind: from Aristotelian pluralism to early modern dualism’, in Meeting of the minds, ed. Brown, S. F. (Turnhout, 1998), 145–66.Google Scholar
Michael, E., ‘Sennert’s sea change: atoms and causes’, in Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories, ed. Lüthy, C. et al. (Leiden, 2001), 331–63.Google Scholar
Michael, E. and Michael, F. S., ‘Gassendi on sensation and reflection: a non-Cartesian dualism’, History of European Ideas, 9 (1988), 583–95.Google Scholar
Michael, F. S., ‘Why logic became epistemology: Gassendi, Port Royal, and the reformation in logic’, in Logic and the workings of the mind, ed. Easton, P. A. (Atascadero, CA, 1997), 1–20.Google Scholar
Micheli, G., ‘The history of philosophy in German in the second half of the seventeenth century’, in Models of the history of philosophy, vol. I, ed. Santinello, G. (Dordrecht, 1993), 371–467.Google Scholar
Mikkeli, H., An Aristotelian response to Renaissance humanism: Jacopo Zabarella on the nature of the arts and sciences (Helsinki, 1992).Google Scholar
Miller, D. M., ‘Qualities, properties, and laws in Newton’s induction’, Philosophy of Science, 76 (2009), 1052–63.Google Scholar
Miller, P. N., ‘Taking paganism seriously: anthropology and antiquarianism in early seventeenth-century histories of religion’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, 3 (2001), 183–209.Google Scholar
Mills, R. J. W., ‘Archibald Campbell’s Necessity of revelation (1739): the science of human nature’s first study of religion’, History of European Ideas, 41 (2015), 728–46.Google Scholar
Mills, R. J. W., ‘Defining man as animal religiosum in English religious writing, c.1650–1700’, Church History, 88 (2019), 925–52.Google Scholar
Milton, A., ed., The British Delegation and the Synod of Dort (1618–1619) (Woodbridge, 2005).Google Scholar
Milton, A., ‘“Anglicanism” by stealth: the career and influence of John Overall’, in Religious politics in post-Reformation England, ed. Fincham, K. and Lake, P. (Woodbridge, 2006), 159–76.Google Scholar
Minerbi Belgrado, A., Sulla crisi della teologia filosofica nel Seicento: Pierre Jurieu e dintorni (Milan, 2008).Google Scholar
Moisuc, C., Métaphysique et théologie chez Nicolas Malebranche (Bucharest, 2015).Google Scholar
Monfasani, J., ‘The pseudo-Aristotelian Problemata and Aristotle’s De animalibus in the Renaissance’, in Natural particulars, ed. Grafton, A. and Siraisi, N. (Cambridge, MA, 1999), 205–47.Google Scholar
Montu, A., ‘La traduzione del De mente humana di Simone Porzio: storia ed esame di un manoscritto inedito’, Filosofia, 19 (1968), 187–94.Google Scholar
Moore, J. D., English hypothetical universalism: John Preston and the softening of Reformed theology (Grand Rapids, 2007).Google Scholar
Moreau, D., Deux Cartésiens: la polémique entre Antoine Arnauld et Nicolas Malebranche (Paris, 1999).Google Scholar
Mori, G., ‘Pierre Bayle, the rights of the conscience, the “remedy” of toleration’, Ratio Juris, 10 (1997), 45–60.Google Scholar
Mori, G., Bayle philosophe (Paris, 1999).Google Scholar
Mori, G., ‘Persécution et art d’écrire: Strauss, Skinner et Pierre Bayle’, in Leo Strauss: art d’écrire, politique, philosophie, ed. Jaffo, L. et al. (Paris, 2001), 197–219.Google Scholar
Mori, G., ‘Pierre Bayle on scepticism and “common notions”’, in The return of scepticism: from Hobbes and Descartes to Bayle, ed. Paganini, G. (Dordrecht, 2003), 389–409.Google Scholar
Mori, G., ‘Bayle e il socinianesimo’, in Fausto Sozzini e la filosofia in Europa, ed. Priarolo, M. and Scribano, E. (Siena, 2005), 179–210.Google Scholar
Mori, G., ‘Introduction’, in Bayle, Pierre, Avis aux réfugiés: réponse d’un nouveau converti, ed. Mori, G. (Paris, 2007), 7–67.Google Scholar
Moriarty, M., Disguised vices: theories of virtue in early modern French thought (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., L’expérience du mouvement: Jean-Baptiste Baliani, disciple et critique de Galilée (Paris, 1967).Google Scholar
Moss, J. D., ‘The rhetoric course at the Collegio Romano in the latter half of the sixteenth century’, Rhetorica, 4 (1986), 137–51.Google Scholar
Mossner, E. C., ‘Hume’s early memoranda, 1729–1740: the complete text’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 9 (1948), 492–518.Google Scholar
Most, G., ‘Bayle’s Presocratics’, in The Presocratics from the Latin middle ages to Hermann Diels, ed. Primavesi, O. and Luchner, K. (Stuttgart, 2011), 237–46.Google Scholar
Muccillo, M., ‘La “prisca theologia” nel “De perenni philosophia” di Agostino Steuco’, Rinascimento, 28 (1988), 41–111.Google Scholar
Mühling, A., ‘Anmerkungen zur Theologenausbildung in Herborn’, in The formation of clerical and confessional identities in early modern Europe, ed. Janse, W. and Pitkin, B. (Leiden, 2006), 71–88.Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., ‘Vera Philosophia cum sacra Theologia nusquam pugnat: Keckermann on philosophy, theology, and the problem of double truth’, Sixteenth Century Journal, 15 (1984), 341–65.Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., ‘The Christological problem in the thought of Jacob Arminius’, Dutch Review of Church History, 68 (1988), 145–63.Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., God, creation, and providence in the thought of Jacob Arminius (Grand Rapids, 1991).Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., The unaccommodated Calvin (Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., ‘The problem of Protestant scholasticism: a review and definition’, in Reformation and scholasticism: an ecumenical enterprise, ed. van Asselt, W. and Dekker, E. (Grand Rapids, 2001), 45–64.Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., After Calvin (Oxford, 2003).Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., Post Reformation Reformed dogmatics, 2nd ed., 4 vols (Grand Rapids, 2003).Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., Christ and the decree: Christology and predestination in Reformed theology from Calvin to Perkins, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, 2008).Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., ‘Not Scotist: understandings of being, univocity, and analogy in early-modern Reformed thought’, Reformation and Renaissance Review, 14 (2012), 127–50.Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., Dictionary of Latin and Greek theological terms, drawn principally from Protestant scholastic theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, 2017).Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., Divine will and human choice: freedom, contingency, and necessity in early modern Reformed thought (Grand Rapids, 2017).Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., Frühneuzeitliche Selbsterhaltung: Telesio und die Naturphilosophie der Renaissance (Tübingen, 1998).Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., ed., Das Ende des Hermetismus (Tübingen, 2002).Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., ‘Antiquarianism and idolatry: the historia of religions in the seventeenth century’, in Historia, ed. Pomata, G. and Siraisi, N. G. (Cambridge, MA, 2005), 181–210.Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., ‘Idolatry and science: against nature worship from Boyle to Rüdiger, 1680–1720’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 67 (2006), 697–712.Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., ‘Impartiality, individualisation, and the historiography of religion: Tobias Pfanner on the rituals of the ancient church’, in History and religion: narrating a religious past, ed. Otto, B.-C., Rau, S., and Rüpke, J. (Berlin, 2015), 257–68.Google Scholar
Mungello, D. E., ‘The Jesuits’ use of Chang Chü-cheng’s commentary in their translation of the Confucian Four Books (1687)’, China Mission Studies (1550–1800) Bulletin, 3 (1983), 12–22.Google Scholar
Mungello, D. E., Curious land: Jesuit accommodation and the origins of Sinology (Honolulu, 1989).Google Scholar
Mungello, D. E., Drowning girls in China: female infanticide since 1650 (Lanham, MD, 2008).Google Scholar
Murr, S., ‘Foi religieuse et libertas philosophandi chez Gassendi’, Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques, 76 (1992), 85–100.Google Scholar
Murr, S., ed., Gassendi et l’Europe (1592–1792), ed. Murr, S. (Paris, 1997).Google Scholar
Murray, G. et al., ‘Huygens, Wren, Wallis, and Newton on the rules of impact and reflection’, in Vanishing matter and the laws of motion: Descartes and beyond, ed. Jalobeanu, D. and Anstey, P. R. (New York, 2011), 153–94.Google Scholar
Nadler, S., ed., Causation in early modern philosophy: Cartesianism, occasionalism, and preestablished harmony (University Park, PA, 1993).Google Scholar
Nadler, S., Occasionalism: causation among the Cartesians (Oxford, 2010).Google Scholar
Napolitani, P. D. and Saito, K., ‘Royal road or labyrinth? Luca Valerio’s De centro gravitatis solidorum and the beginning of modern mathematics’, Bolletino di storia delle scienze mathematiche, 24 (2004), 67–124.Google Scholar
Nauenberg, M., ‘Newton’s Portsmouth perturbation method and its application to lunar motion’, in The foundations of Newtonian scholarship, ed. Dalitz, R. H. and Nauenberg, M. (Singapore, 2000), 167–98.Google Scholar
Nauta, L., ‘William of Ockham and Lorenzo Valla: false friends. Semantics and ontological reduction’, Renaissace Quarterly, 56 (2003), 613–51.Google Scholar
Nauta, L., In defense of common sense: Lorenzo Valla’s humanist critique of scholastic philosophy (Cambridge, MA, 2009).Google Scholar
Nauta, L., ‘Anti-essentialism and the rhetoricization of knowledge: Mario Nizolio’s humanist attack on universals’, Renaissance Quarterly, 65 (2012), 31–66.Google Scholar
Nauta, L., ‘The critique of scholastic language in Renaissance humanism and early modern philosophy’, in Early modern philosophers and the Renaissance legacy, ed. Muratori, C. and Paganini, G. (Dordrecht, 2016), 59–80.Google Scholar
Ndiaye, A. R., La philosophie d’Antoine Arnauld (Paris, 1991).Google Scholar
Nedergaard, L., ‘La genèse du “Dictionaire historique et critique” de Pierre Bayle’, in Orbis litterarum, 13 (1958), 210–27.Google Scholar
Neele, A., Petrus van Mastricht (1630–1706). Reformed orthodoxy: method and piety (Leiden, 2009).Google Scholar
Negro, P., ‘A topos in Hugo Grotius: etiamsi daremus non esse Deum’, Grotiana, 19 (1998), 3–23.Google Scholar
Newman, W. R., Atoms and alchemy: chymistry and the experimental origins of the scientific revolution (Chicago, 2006).Google Scholar
Newman, W. R., ‘How not to integrate the history and philosophy of science: a reply to Chalmers’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41 (2010), 203–13.Google Scholar
Newman, W. R., Newton the alchemist (Princeton, 2018).Google Scholar
Nielsen, L. O., ‘A seventeenth-century physician on God and atoms: Sebastian Basso’, in Meaning and inference in medieval philosophy, ed. Kretzmann, N. (Dordrecht, 1988), 297–370.Google Scholar
Nouhuys, T. van, The age of two-faced Janus: the comets of 1577 and 1618 and the decline of the Aristotelian view in the Netherlands (Leiden, 1998).Google Scholar
Nutton, V., ‘The rise of medical humanism: Ferrara, 1464–1555’, Renaissance Studies, 11 (1997), 2–19.Google Scholar
O’Banion, P., ‘Jerome Zanchi, the application of theology, and the rise of the English practical divinity tradition’, Renaissance and Reformation, 24 (2005), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Higgins, J., Anthony Collins: the man and his works (The Hague, 1970).Google Scholar
Oberman, H., The harvest of medieval theology: Gabriel Biel and late medieval nominalism (Cambridge, 1963).Google Scholar
Oberman, H., Werden und Wertung der Reformation: vom Wegestreit zum Glaubenskampf (Tübingen, 1977).Google Scholar
Oberman, H., ‘The scholastic rift: a parting of the ways’, in Masters of the Reformation: the emergence of a new intellectual culture in Europe (Cambridge, 1981), 23–44.Google Scholar
Olson, R. J. M. and Pasachoff, J. M., ‘Historical comets over Bavaria: the Nuremberg Chronicle and broadsides’, in Comets in the post-Halley era, 2 vols (Dordrecht, 1991), ii.1309–41.Google Scholar
Ong, W., Ramus, method, and the decay of dialogue (Cambridge, MA, 1958).Google Scholar
Orcibal, J., Jansénius d’Ypres (1585–1638) (Paris, 1989).Google Scholar
Orland, B., ‘White blood and red milk: analogical reasoning in medical practice and experimental physiology (1560–1730)’, in Blood, sweat and tears, ed. Horstmanshoff, M. et al. (Leiden, 2012), 443–78.Google Scholar
Osler, M. J., ‘Galileo, motion, and essences’, ISIS, 64 (1973), 504–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, M. J., Divine will and the mechanical philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on contingency and necessity in the created world (Cambridge, 1994).Google Scholar
Ossa-Richardson, A., The Devil’s tabernacle: the pagan oracles in early modern thought (Princeton, 2013).Google Scholar
Ossa-Richardson, A., A history of ambiguity (Princeton, 2019).Google Scholar
Ott, W. R., Causation and laws of nature in early modern philosophy (Oxford, 2009).Google Scholar
Paganini, G., Analisi della fede e critica della ragione nella filosofia di Pierre Bayle (Florence, 1980).Google Scholar
Paganini, G., ‘Thomas Hobbes e Lorenzo Valla: critica umanistica e filosofia moderna’, Rinascimento, 2nd series, 39 (1999), 515–68.Google Scholar
Paganini, G., ‘Hobbes, Valla and the Trinity’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 11 (2003), 183–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paganini, G., ‘Towards a “critical” Bayle: three recent studies’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 37 (2004), 510–20.Google Scholar
Pagel, W., Paracelsus: an introduction to philosophical medicine in the era of the Renaissance, 2nd rev. ed. (Basel, 1982).Google Scholar
Palmeri, F., State of nature, stages of society: enlightenment conjectural history and modern social discourse (New York, 2016).Google Scholar
Palmerino, C. R., ‘Galileo’s and Gassendi’s solutions to the Rota Aristotelis paradox: a bridge between matter and motion theories’, in Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories, ed. Lüthy, C., Murdoch, J. E. and Newman, W. R. (Leiden, 2001), 381–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmerino, C. R., ‘Galileo’s theories of free fall and projective motion as interpreted by Pierre Gassendi’, in The reception of the Galilean science of motion in seventeenth-century Europe, ed. Palmerino, C. R. and Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (Dordrecht, 2004), 137–64.Google Scholar
Palmerino, C. R., ‘Une force invisible à l’œuvre: la vis attrahens dans la physique de Pierre Gassendi’, in Gassendi et la modernité, ed. Taussig, S. (Turnhout, 2008), 141–76.Google Scholar
Palmerino, C. R., ‘Experiments, mathematics, physical causes: how Mersenne came to doubt the validity of Galileo’s law of free fall’, Perspectives on Science, 18 (2010), 50–76.Google Scholar
Palmieri, P., ‘Breaking the circle: the emergence of Archimedean mechanics in the late Renaissance’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 62 (2008), 301–46.Google Scholar
Pampusch, A. M., ‘“Experimental”, “metaphysical”, and “hypothetical” philosophy in Newtonian methodology’, Centaurus, 18 (1974), 289–300.Google Scholar
Panza, M., ‘Isaac Barrow and the bounds of geometry’, in Liber amicorum Jean Dhombres, ed. Radelet De-Grave, P. (Turnout, 2008), 365–411.Google Scholar
Papineau, D., ‘The vis viva controversy: do meanings matter?’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 8 (1977), 111–42.Google Scholar
Park, P. J., Africa, Asia, and the history of philosophy: racism in the formation of the philosophical canon, 1780–1830 (New York, 2013).Google Scholar
Park, W., Philosophy’s loss of logic to mathematics (Dordrecht, 2018).Google Scholar
Pasnau, R., Metaphysical themes, 1274–1671 (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Pasnau, R., ‘Science and certainty’, in The Cambridge history of medieval philosophy, ed. Pasnau, R. and van Dyke, C. (Cambridge, 2014), 357–68.Google Scholar
Pastorino, C., ‘Alchemy and the electric spirit in Isaac Newton’s General scholium’, in Newton’s General Scholium after 300 years, ed. Ducheyne, S., Mandelbrote, S., and Snobelen, S. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Pease, A. S., ‘The omen of sneezing’, Classical Philology, 6 (1911), 429–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pécharman, M., ‘“Une pensée métaphysique si subtile”: la défense par Bayle du plaisir comme bonheur’, Les Etudes philosophiques, 109 (2014), 253–86.Google Scholar
Perfetti, S., ‘Three different ways of interpreting Aristotle’s De partibus animalium: Pietro Pomponazzi, Niccolò Leonico Tomeo and Agostino Nifo’, in Aristotle’s animals in the middle ages and Renaissance, ed. Steel, C. G. et al. (Leuven, 1999), 297–316.Google Scholar
Perfetti, S., Aristotle’s zoology and its Renaissance commentators, 1521–1601 (Leuven, 2000).Google Scholar
Perler, D. and Bender, S., Causation and cognition in early modern philosophy, ed. Perler, D. and Bender, S. (New York, 2020).Google Scholar
Perrone Compagni, V., ‘Introduzione’, in Trattato sull’immortalità dell’anima, trans. Perrone Compagni, V. (Florence, 1999).Google Scholar
Perry, E. I., From theology to history: French religious controversy and the revocation of the Edict of Nantes (The Hague, 1973).Google Scholar
Pfeffer, M., ‘Mortalism and the making of heterodoxy in seventeenth-century England’. PhD thesis, University of Queensland (2020).Google Scholar
Pfizenmaier, T. C., The Trinitarian theology of Dr. Samuel Clarke (1675–1729) (Leiden, 1997).Google Scholar
Pfizenmaier, T. C., ‘Why the third fell out: Trinitarian dissent’, in Religion, politics, and dissent, 1660–1832, ed. Cornwall, R. D. and Gibson, W. (Aldershot, 2010), 17–34.Google Scholar
Piaia, G., ‘The histories of philosophy in France in the age of Descartes’, in Models of the history of philosophy, vol. II: From the Cartesian age to Brucker, ed. Piaia, G. and Santinello, G. (Dordrecht, 2011), 3–92.Google Scholar
Piaia, G., ‘Philosophical historiography in France from Bayle to Deslandes’, in Models of the history of philosophy, vol. II, ed. Piaia, G. and Santinello, G. (Dordrecht, 2011), 93–176.Google Scholar
Piaia, G., Bergamaschi, G., and Scarduelli, L., ‘The history of philosophy and the histoire de l’esprit humain in France between the Encyclopaedia and the French Revolution’, in Models of the history of philosophy, vol. III: The second enlightenment and the Kantian age, ed. Piaia, G. and Santinello, G. (Dordrecht, 2015), 3–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigney, S., ‘Theophilus Gale and historiography of philosophy’, in Insiders and outsiders in seventeenth-century philosophy, ed. Rogers, G. A. J., Sorell, T., and Kraye, J. (New York and Oxford, 2010), 407–20.Google Scholar
Pitassi, M.-C., ‘Jean Le Clerc bon tâcheron de la philosophie: l’enseignement philosophique à la fin du XVIIIe siècle’, Lias, 10 (1983), 105–22.Google Scholar
Pitassi, M.-C., Entre croire et savoir: le problème de la méthode critique chez Jean Le Clerc (Leiden, 1987).Google Scholar
Pitassi, M.-C., ed., Apologétique 1680–1740: sauvetage ou naufrage de la théologie? (Geneva, 1991).Google Scholar
Pitassi, M.-C., ‘Entre libido et savoir: les images de la femme chez Bayle’, in Pierre Bayle dans la république des lettres, ed. McKenna, A. and Paganini, G. (Paris, 2004), 307–19.Google Scholar
Pitassi, M.-C., ‘Fondements de la croyance et statut de l’Ecriture: Bayle et la question de l’examen’, in Les ‘Eclaircissements’ de Pierre Bayle, ed. Bost, H. and McKenna, A. (Paris, 2010), 143–60.Google Scholar
Pittion, J.-P., ‘Hume’s reading of Bayle: an enquiry into the source and role of the Memoranda’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 15 (1977), 373–86.Google Scholar
Plastina, S., ‘Bernardino Telesio nell’Inghilterra del Seicento’, in Bernardino Telesio tra filosofia naturale e scienza moderna, ed. Mocchi, G. et al. (Rome, 2012), 133–44.Google Scholar
Platt, J., Reformed thought and scholasticism: the arguments for the existence of God in Dutch theology, 1575–1650 (Leiden, 1981).Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., Barbarism and religion, 6 vols (Cambridge, 1999–2015).Google Scholar
Pomata, G., ‘Praxis historialis: the uses of historia in early modern medicine’, in Historia, ed. Pomata, G. and Siraisi, N. (Cambridge, MA, 2005), 105–46.Google Scholar
Pomata, G., ‘A word of the Empirics: the ancient concept of observation and its recovery in early modern medicine’, Annals of Science, 68 (2011), 1–25.Google Scholar
Pomata, G., ‘Observation rising: birth of an epistemic genre, 1500–1650’, in Histories of scientific observation, ed. Daston, L. and Lünbeck, E. (Chicago, 2011), 45–80.Google Scholar
Pomplun, R. T., ‘Predestined a passable redeemer: scientia media in early modern Christologies’, in Beyond Dordt and De auxiliis, ed. Ballor, J., Gaetano, M., and Sytsma, D. (Leiden, 2019), 87–102.Google Scholar
Poole, W., ‘The letters of Shen Fuzong to Thomas Hyde, 1687–88’, Electronic British Library Journal (2015), article 9.Google Scholar
Popkin, R., ‘The crisis of polytheism and the answers of Vossius, Cudworth and Newton’, in Essays on the context, nature, and influence of Isaac Newton’s theology, ed. Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1990), 9–26.Google Scholar
Popkin, R., The history of scepticism, from Savonarola to Bayle: revised and expanded edition (Oxford, 2003).Google Scholar
Poppi, A., La filosofia nello studio francescano del Santo a Padova (Padua, 1989), 63–115.Google Scholar
Poppi, A., ‘La difficile integrazione dell’Aristotelismo Padovano nella teologia Tridentina: Iacopo Zabarella e Antonio Possevino’, in Aristotelica et Lulliana magistro doctissimo Charles H. Lohr septuagesimum annum feliciter agenti dedicata, ed. Domínguez Reboiras, F. et al. (Turnhout, 1995), 245–58.Google Scholar
Posthumus Meyjes, G. H. M. and Bots, H., ed., Livre des actes des Eglises wallonnes aux Pays-Bas, 1601–1697 (The Hague, 2005).Google Scholar
Poujol, D. F., Histoire et influence des Eglises wallonnes dans les Pays-Bas (Paris, 1902).Google Scholar
Prat, J. M., Maldonat et l’Université de Paris au XVIe siècle (Paris, 1856).Google Scholar
Preus, J. S., Spinoza and the irrelevance of biblical authority (Cambridge, 2001).Google Scholar
Pullapilly, C., Caesar Baronius: Counter-Reformation historian (Notre Dame, 1975).Google Scholar
Pulte, H., Das Prinzip der kleinsten Wirkung und die Kraftkonzeptionen der rationalem Mechanik (Stuttgart, 1989).Google Scholar
Pulte, H., ‘“’Tis much better to do a little with certainty”: on the reception of Newton’s methodology’, in The reception of Isaac Newton in Europe, ed. Pulte, H. and Mandelbrote, S., 3 vols (London, 2019), i.355–84.Google Scholar
Pulte, H. and Mandelbrote, S., ed. The reception of Isaac Newton in Europe, ed., 2 vols (London, 2019).Google Scholar
Purnell, F., ‘Jacopo Mazzoni and Galileo’, Physis, 3 (1972), 273–94.Google Scholar
Pycior, H. M., ‘Mathematics and philosophy: Wallis, Hobbes, Barrow, and Berkeley’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 48 (1987), 265–86.Google Scholar
Pyle, A., ‘Animal generation and the mechanical philosophy: some light on the role of biology in the scientific revolution’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 9 (1987), 225–54.Google Scholar
Pyle, A., ‘Malebranche on animal generation: pre-existence and the microscope’, in The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy, ed. Smith, J. E. H. (Cambridge, 2006), 194–214.Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘La raison, la certitude, la foi: quelques remarques préliminaires de l’acte de foi selon Huet’, in Pierre-Daniel Huet (1630–1721), ed. Guellouz, S. (Paris, 1993), 83–98.Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘Les pères de l’Eglise au XVIIe siècle: chronologie et essai de bibliographie’, in Les pères de l’Eglise au XVIIe siècle, ed. Bury, E. and Meunier, B. (Paris, 1993), 505–52.Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., Le catholicisme classique et les pères de l’Église: un retour aux sources (1669–1713) (Paris, 1999).Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘Reason and reasonableness in French ecclesiastical scholarship’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 74 (2001), 401–36.Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘Anglican scholarship gone mad? Hendy Dodwell (1641–1711) and Christian antiquity’, in History of Scholarship, ed. Quantin, J.-L. and Ligota, C. (Oxford, 2006), 305–55.Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘Entre Rome et Paris, entre histoire et théologie, les Selecta historiae ecclesiasticae capita du P. Noël Alexandre et les ambiguïtés de l’historiographie gallicane’, Mémoire dominicaine, 20 (2007), 67–100.Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., The Church of England and Christian antiquity (Oxford, 2008).Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘La philosophie corruptrice de la théologie selon Jansénius’, in Philosophie et théologie. Anthologie tome III: Philosophie et théologie à l’époque moderne, ed. Bardout, J.-C. (Paris, 2010), 187–97.Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘John Selden et l’étude de l’antiquité chrétienne: érudition, critique et anticléricalisme’, Annuaire de l’Institut Michel Villey, 3 (2011), 339–89.Google Scholar
Quinto, R., Scholastica: storia di un concetto (Padua, 2001).Google Scholar
Rademaker, C. S. M., Life and work of Gerardus Joannes Vossius (1577–1648) (Assen, 1981).Google Scholar
Radeva, Z., ‘At the origins of a tenacious narrative: Jacob Thomasius and the history of double truth’, Intellectual History Review, 29 (2019), 417–38.Google Scholar
Ragland, C. P., The will to reason: theodicy and freedom in Descartes (Oxford, 2016).Google Scholar
Ragland, E., ‘Mechanism, the senses, and reason: Franciscus Sylvius and Leiden debates over anatomical knowledge after Harvey and Descartes’, in Early modern medicine and natural philosophy, ed. Distelzweig, P. et al. (Dordrecht, 2014), 173–205.Google Scholar
Ragland, E., ‘“Making trials” in sixteenth- and early seventeenth-century European academic medicine’, ISIS, 108 (2017), 503–28.Google Scholar
Reeds, K., Botany in medieval and Renaissance universities (New York, 1991).Google Scholar
Rees, G., ‘Francis Bacon’s semi-Paracelsian cosmology’, Ambix, 22 (1975), 81–101, 161–73.Google Scholar
Reid, J., ‘Malebranche on intelligible extension’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 11 (2003), 581–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J., ‘The evolution of Henry More’s theory of divine absolute space’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45 (2007), 79–102.Google Scholar
Reid, J., ‘The spatial presence of spirits among the Cartesians’, in Journal of the History of Philosophy, 46 (2008), 91–118.Google Scholar
Reid, J., The metaphysics of Henry More (Dordrecht, 2012).Google Scholar
Reif, M. R., ‘Natural philosophy in some early seventeenth century scholastic textbooks’. PhD thesis, St Louis University (1962).Google Scholar
Reiner, H., ‘Die Entstehung der Lehre vom bibliothekarischen Ursprung des Namens Metaphysik: Geschichte einer Wissenschaftslegende’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie Forschung, 9 (1955), 77–99.Google Scholar
Renn, J. and Damerow, P., The equilibrium controversy (Berlin, 2012).Google Scholar
Rétat, P., Le Dictionnaire de Bayle et la lutte philosophique au XVIIIe siècle (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
Rex, W., Essays on Pierre Bayle and religious controversy (The Hague, 1965).Google Scholar
Ribard, D., ‘Le “petit maître” de Saumur: Tanneguy Le Fèvre et la socialisation de l’érudition protestante’, Bulletin de la Société d’histoire du protestantisme français, 154 (2008), 41–59.Google Scholar
Riley, P., The general will before Rousseau: the transformation of the divine into the civil (Princeton, 1986).Google Scholar
Rita Capoccia, A., ‘Modernità e ortodossia: strategie di conciliazione e dissidenza nell’insegnamento della filosofia nei collegi gesuitici del primo Settecento’, Les Dossiers du Grihl (2009), DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/dossiersgrihl.3678.Google Scholar
Ritschl, O., System und systematische Methode in der Geschichte des wissenschaft-lichen Sprachgebrauchs und der philosophischen Methodologie (Bonn, 1906).Google Scholar
Robertson, J., The case for the enlightenment: Scotland and Naples, 1680–1760 (Cambridge, 2005).Google Scholar
Robinet, A., ed., Correspondance Leibniz–Clarke présentée (Paris, 1957).Google Scholar
Robinet, A., ‘Huygens et Malebranche’, in Huygens et la France (Paris, 1981), 223–40.Google Scholar
Robinson, H., The great comet of 1680: a study in the history of rationalism, 2nd ed. (Cleveland, 1916).Google Scholar
Rochot, B., ‘Sur les notions de temps et d’espace chez quelques auteurs du XVIIe siècle, notamment Gassendi et Barrow’, Revue d’histoire des sciences et de leurs applications, 9 (1956), 97–104.Google Scholar
Roger, J., The life sciences in eighteenth-century French thought, trans. Ellrich, R. (Stanford, 1997).Google Scholar
Romeyer, B., ‘Libre arbitre et concours selon Molina’, Gregorianum, 23 (1942), 169–201.Google Scholar
Rooden, P. van, Theology, biblical scholarship, and rabbinical studies in the seventeenth century: Constantijn L’Empereur (1591–1648) (Leiden, 1989).Google Scholar
Roorda, D. J., ‘The Peace of Nijmegen: the end of a particular period in Dutch history’, in The Peace of Nijmegen 1676–1678/79, ed. Bots, H. (Amsterdam, 1980), 17–28.Google Scholar
Rose, P. L., ‘Professors of mathematics at Padua University, 1521–1588’, Physis, 17 (1975), 300–4.Google Scholar
Rose, P. L., The Italian Renaissance of mathematics (Geneva, 1975).Google Scholar
Rose, P. L. and Drake, S., ‘The Pseudo-Aristotelian Questions of mechanics in Renaissance culture’, Studies in the Renaissance, 18 (1971), 65–104.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, L., ‘Newton’s views on aether and gravitation’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 6 (1969), 29–37.Google Scholar
Rossi, M., La vita, le opere, i tempi di Edoardo Herbert di Cherbury, 3 vols (Florence, 1947).Google Scholar
Rossi, P., ‘Il metodo induttivo e la polemica antioccultistica in G. Fracastoro’, Rivista critica di storia della filosofia, 9 (1954), 485–99.Google Scholar
Rostenberg, L., ‘Richard and Anne Baldwin, Whig patriot publishers’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 47 (1953), 1–42.Google Scholar
Rousseau, G. S., ‘Mysticism and millenarianism: “Immortal Dr Cheyne”’, in Millenarianism and Messianism in English literature and thought, 1650–1800, ed. Popkin, R. (Leiden, 1988), 81–126.Google Scholar
Roux, B., ‘Le Pasteur Charles de Rochefort et l’Histoire naturelle et morale des îles Antilles de l’Amérique’, in Les Indiens des Petites Antilles, ed. Grunberg, B. (Paris, 2011), 175–216.Google Scholar
Roux, S., ‘Le scepticisme et les hypothèses de la physique’, Revue de Synthèse, 2–3 (1998), 211–55.Google Scholar
Roux, S., ‘Cartesian mechanics’, in The reception of the Galilean science of motion in seventeenth-century Europe, ed. Palmerino, C. R. and Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (Dordrecht, 2004), 25–66.Google Scholar
Roux, S., L’essai de logique de Mariotte: archéologie des idées d’un savant ordinaire (Paris, 2011).Google Scholar
Roux, S., ‘Was there a Cartesian experimentalism in 1660s France?’, in Cartesian empiricisms, ed. Dobre, M. and Nyden, T. (Dordrecht, 2013), 47–88.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, J. S., ‘John Freind: physician, chemist, Jacobite, and friend of Voltaire’s’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 61 (2007), 109–27.Google Scholar
Rozemond, M., ‘The Achilles argument and the nature of matter in the Clarke Collins correspondence’, in The Achilles of rationalist psychology, ed. Lennon, T. M. and Stainton, R. J. (Dordrecht, 2008), 159–76.Google Scholar
Ruffner, J. A., ‘Newton’s propositions on comets: steps in transition, 1681–1684’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 54 (2000), 259–77.Google Scholar
Ruffner, J. A. ‘Newton’s De gravitatione: a review and reassessment’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 66 (2012), 241–64.Google Scholar
Ruffner, J. A., ‘The snare of simplicity: the Newton–Flamsteed correspondence revisited’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 67 (2013), 415–55.Google Scholar
Rule, P., K’ung-tzu or Confucius? The Jesuit interpretation of Confucianism (Boston, 1986).Google Scholar
Ruler, J. A. van, The crisis of causality: Voetius and Descartes on God, nature, and change (Leiden, 1995).Google Scholar
Rüpke, J., ‘Historicizing religion: Varro’s Antiquitates and history of religion in the late Roman republic’, History of Religions, 53 (2014), 246–68.Google Scholar
Rutherford, D. P., ‘Natures, laws, and miracles: the roots of Leibniz’s critique of occasionalism’, in Causation in early modern philosophy, ed. Nadler, S. (University Park, PA, 1993), 135–58.Google Scholar
Rutherford, D. P., Leibniz and the rational order of nature (Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar
Rutten, P., ‘“Secundum processum et mentem Versoris”: John Versor and his relation to the schools of thought reconsidered’, Vivarium, 43 (2005), 292–336.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. T., ‘New worlds in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries’, in Comparative Studies in Society and History, 23 (1981), 519–38.Google Scholar
Ryan, T., Pierre Bayle’s Cartesian metaphysics: rediscovering early modern philosophy (New York, 2009).Google Scholar
Rynasiewicz, R., ‘By their properties, causes and effects: Newton’s scholium on time, space, place and motion – I. The text’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 26 (1995), 133–53.Google Scholar
Rynasiewicz, R., ‘By their properties, causes and effects: Newton’s scholium on time, space, place and motion – II. The context’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 26 (1995), 295–321.Google Scholar
Sailor, D. B., ‘Newton’s debt to Cudworth’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 49 (1988), 511–18.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, K., ‘The German Hercules’s heir: Pierre Gassendi’s reception of Keplerian ideas’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 70 (2009), 69–91.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, K., Julius Caesar Scaliger, Renaissance Reformer of Aristotelianism (Leiden, 2016).Google Scholar
Salatowsky, S., Die Philosophie der Sozinianer: Transformationen zwischen Renaissance-Aristotelismus und Frühaufklärung (Stuttgart, 2015).Google Scholar
Salatowsky, S., ‘God in time and space: Socinian physics and its opponents’, in Natural knowledge and Aristotelianism at early modern universities, ed. Omodeo, P. D. and Wels, V. (Wiesbaden, 2019), 47–82.Google Scholar
Sandberg, K., ‘Pierre Jurieu’s contribution to Bayle’s Dictionnaire’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 3 (1965), 59–64.Google Scholar
Sander, C., ‘The war of the roses: the debate between Diego de Ledesma and Benet Perera about the philosophy course at the Jesuit College in Rome’, Quaestio, 14 (2014), 39–50.Google Scholar
Sangalli, M., ‘Di Paolo Beni e di una riforma dello studio di Padova (1619)’, Studi Veneziani, 42 (2001), 67–134.Google Scholar
Sangalli, M., ‘Between church, university and academies: Paolo Beni in Padua, 1599–1623’, in The Italian Academies, 1525–1700, ed. Everson, J. et al. (Abingdon, 2016), 118–31.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, A., ‘Samuel Clarke on agent causation, voluntarism, and occasionalism’, Science in Context, 31 (2018), 421–56.Google Scholar
Sarasohn, L., Gassendi’s ethics: freedom in a mechanistic universe (Ithaca, NY, 1996).Google Scholar
Sassen, F., De reis van Pierre Gassendi in de Nederlanden (1628–1629) (Amsterdam, 1960).Google Scholar
Scapin, P., ‘La metafisica scotista a Padova dal XV al XVII secolo’, in Storia e cultura al Santo, ed. Poppi, A. (Vicenza, 1976), 485–538.Google Scholar
Schäfer, P., Kirche und Vernunft: die Kirche in der katholischen Theologie der Aufklärungszeit (Munich, 1974).Google Scholar
Schaffer, S. and Shapin, S., Leviathan and the air pump (Princeton, 1985).Google Scholar
Schapera, I., ed., The early Cape Hottentots described in the writings of Olfert Dapper (1668), Willem ten Rhyne (1686) and Johannes Gulielmus de Gravenbroek (Cape Town, 1933).Google Scholar
Schliesser, E., ‘Without God: gravity as a relational quality of matter in Newton’s treatise’, in Vanishing matter and the laws of motion: Descartes and beyond, ed. Anstey, P. and Jalobeanu, D. (New York, 2009), 80–102.Google Scholar
Schliesser, E., ‘Newton’s substance monism, distant action, and the nature of Newton’s empiricism’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42 (2011), 160–6.Google Scholar
Schliesser, E., ‘Newton’s challenge to philosophy: a programmatic essay’, HOPOS, 1 (2011), 101–28.Google Scholar
Schliesser, E., ‘Newtonian emanation, Spinozism, measurement and the Baconian origins of the laws of nature’, Foundations of Science, 18 (2013), 449–66.Google Scholar
Schloemann, M., Siegmund Jacob Baumgarten: System und Geschichte in der Theologie des Überganges zum Neuprotestantismus (Göttingen, 1974).Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T., ‘What has Cartesianism to do with Jansenism?’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 60 (1999), 37–56.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T., Radical Cartesianism: the French reception of Descartes (Cambridge, 2002).Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T., ‘A tale of two condemnations: Two Cartesian condemnations in 17th-century France’, in Il Seicento e Descartes, ed. Del Prete, A. (Florence, 2004), 203–21.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T., ‘Malebranche on natural and free loves’, in The concept of love in seventeenth and eighteenth century philosophy, ed. Boros, G. et al. (Brussels, 2005), 41–52.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T., ‘Descartes on the extensions of space and time’, Analytica, 13 (2009), 113–47.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T., ‘The metaphysics of rest in Descartes and Malebranche’, Res philosophica, 92 (2015), 21–40.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T., Early modern Cartesianisms: Dutch and French constructions (Oxford, 2017).Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T., ‘Newton and the Cartesians’, in The Oxford handbook of Newton, ed. Schliesser, E. and Smeenk, C. (Oxford, forthcoming). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199930418.013.29.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J., ‘Inventing the enlightenment: anti-Jacobins, British Hegelians, and the Oxford English Dictionary’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 64 (2003), 421–43.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., ‘Aristotle as cuttlefish: the origin and development of a Renaissance image’, Studies in the Renaissance, 12 (1965), 60–72.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola (1469–1533) and his critique of Aristotle (The Hague, 1967).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., ‘William Harvey and Renaissance Aristotelianism: a consideration of the Praefatio to “De generatione animalium” (1651)’, in Humanismus und Medizin, ed. Keil, G. and Schmitz, R. (Weinheim, 1984), 117–38.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., ‘The rise of the philosophical textbook’, in The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy, ed. Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q. (Cambridge, 1988), 792–804.Google Scholar
Schofield, R. E., Mechanism and materialism: British natural philosophy in the age of reason (Princeton, 1974).Google Scholar
Scholder, K., Ursprünge und Probleme der Bibelkritik im 17. Jahrhundert: ein Beitrag zur Entstehung der historisch-kritischen Theologie (Munich, 1966).Google Scholar
Schoot, J. van der, ‘Interpreting the Kosmotheoros (1698): a historiographical essay on theology and philosophy in the work of Christiaan Huygens’, De Zeventiende Eeuw, 30 (2014), 20–39.Google Scholar
Schrader, W., Geschichte der Friedrichs-Universität zu Halle, 2 vols (Berlin, 1894).Google Scholar
Schüller, V., ‘Newton’s Scholia from David Gregory’s estate on the Propositions IV through IX Book III of his Principia’, in Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant, ed. Lefèvre, W. (Dordrecht, 2001), 213–65.Google Scholar
Schuster, J., Descartes-agonistes: physico-mathematics, method, and corpuscular-mechanism, 1618–33 (Dordrecht, 2012).Google Scholar
Schütt, H.-P., Die Adoption des ‘Vaters der modernen Philosophie’ (Frankfurt, 1998).Google Scholar
Schuurman, P., ‘The empiricist logic of ideas of Jean Le Clerc’, in The early enlightenment in the Dutch Republic, 1650–1750, ed. van Bunge, W. (Leiden, 2001), 137–56.Google Scholar
Schuurman, P., Ideas, mental faculties and method: the logic of ideas of Descartes and Locke (Leiden, 2004).Google Scholar
Schuurman, P., ‘Continuity and change in the empiricism of John Locke and Gerardus de Vries (1648–1705)’, History of European Ideas, 33 (2007), 292–304.Google Scholar
Scriba, C. J., ‘The autobiography of John Wallis’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 25 (1970), 17–46.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, A., Jansenism in seventeenth-century France (Charlottesville, 1977).Google Scholar
Sepkoski, D., Nominalism and constructivism in seventeenth-century mathematical philosophy (New York, 2007).Google Scholar
Sergio, E., ‘L’Accademia Cosentina e l’eredità del naturalismo telesiano’, in Storia del pensiero filosofico in Calabria da Pitagora ai giorni nostri, ed. Alcaro, M. (Soveria Mannelli, 2012), 259–72.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R., ‘Francis Bacon and the “interpretation of nature” in the late Renaissance’, ISIS, 105 (2014), 681–705.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R., ‘Comparativism against Christianity? Edward Herbert and pagan religion’ (paper presented at CRASSH Comparatism Seminar, Cambridge, December 2014).Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R., ‘The education of Francis Willughby’, in Virtuoso by nature: the scientific worlds of Francis Willughby, ed. Birkhead, T. (Leiden, 2016), 44–98.Google Scholar
Serrurier, C., Pierre Bayle en Hollande: étude historique et critique (Apelldoorn, 1912).Google Scholar
Shackelford, J., A philosophical path for Paracelsian medicine: the ideas, intellectual context, and influence of Petrus Severinus, 1540–1602 (Copenhagen, 2002).Google Scholar
Shank, J. B., ‘On the alleged Cartesianism of Fontenelle’, Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences, 53 (2003), 139–56.Google Scholar
Shank, J. B., The Newton wars and the beginning of the French enlightenment (Chicago, 2006).Google Scholar
Shank, J. B., Before Voltaire: the French origins of ‘Newtonian’ mechanics, 1680–1715 (Chicago, 2018).Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. E., ‘Kinematic optics: a study of the wave theory of light in the seventeenth century’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 11 (1973), 134–266.Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. E., ‘Light, pressure, and rectilinear propagation: Descartes’ celestial optics and Newton’s hydrostatics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 5 (1974), 239–96.Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. E., ‘The evolving structure of Newton’s theory of white light and color’, ISIS, 71 (1980), 211–35.Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. E., ‘The Optical lectures and the foundations of the theory of optical imagery’, in Before Newton: the life and times of Isaac Barrow, ed. Feingold, M. (Cambridge, 1990), 105–78.Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. E., Fits, passions, and paroxysms: physics, method, and chemistry and Newton’s theories of colored bodies and fits of easy reflection (Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. E., ‘Newton’s “experimental philosophy”’, Early Science and Medicine, 9 (2004), 185–217.Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. E., ‘Newton’s optical theories and vibrating media: the electrical spirit of the General Scholium and the electrical queries of the Opticks’, Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences, 65 (2015), 77–99.Google Scholar
Shea, W. R., Galileo’s intellectual revolution (New York, 1972).Google Scholar
Shea, W. R., Designing experiments and games of chance: the unconventional science of Blaise Pascal (Canton, MA, 2003).Google Scholar
Shelford, A. G., Transforming the republic of letters: Pierre-Daniel Huet and European intellectual life, 1650–1720 (Rochester, NY, 2007).Google Scholar
Sheppard, K., Anti-atheism in early modern England 1580–1720 (Leiden, 2015).Google Scholar
Shuttleton, D. E., ‘“My own crazy carcase”: the life and works of Dr George Cheyne (1672–1743)’. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh (1992).Google Scholar
Sierhuis, F., The literature of the Arminian controversy: religion, politics and the stage in the Dutch Republic (Oxford, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvera, M., ‘Contribution à l’examen des sources de L’Histoire des Juifs de Jacques Basnage: Las Excelencias de los Hebreos de Ysaac Cardoso’, Studia Rosenthaliana, 25 (1991), 149–61.Google Scholar
Simonutti, L., ‘Bayle and Le Clerc as readers of Cudworth: elements of the debate on plastic nature in the Dutch learned journals’, Geschiedenis van de Wijsbegeerte in Nederland, 4 (1993), 147–65.Google Scholar
Simonutti, L., ‘Bayle et ses amis: Paets, Furly, Shaftesbury, et le Club de “La Lanterne”’, in Pierre Bayle dans la république des lettres, ed. McKenna, A. and Paganini, G. (Paris, 2004), 61–78.Google Scholar
Sina, M., ‘Metafisica e teologia in alcune lettere inedite di Isaac Papin’, Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica, 94 (2002), 89–134, 491–558.Google Scholar
Sina, M., ‘Introduzione’, in Chouet, Jean-Robert, Corsi di filosofia, ed. Sina, M, 2 vols (Florence, 2010), i.Google Scholar
Sina, M. and Sina, R., ‘Metafisica Cartesiana e teologia nell’epistolario di Jean Le Clerc’, Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica, 93 (2001), 167–90.Google Scholar
Sinnema, D., ‘Reformed scholasticism and the Synod of Dort (1618–19)’, in John Calvin’s Institutes: his Opus Magnum, ed. van der Walt, B. (Potchefstroom, 1986), 467–506.Google Scholar
Sinnema, D., ‘Antoine de Chandieu’s call for a scholastic Reformed theology (1580)’, in Later Calvinism, ed. Fred Graham, W. (Kirksville, MO, 1994), 159–90.Google Scholar
Sinnema, D., ‘God’s eternal decree and its temporal execution: the role of this distinction in Theodore Beza’s theology’, in Adaptations of Calvinism in Reformation Europe, ed. Holt, M. (Burlington, VT, 2007), 55–78.Google Scholar
Sinnema, D., ‘Beza’s view of predestination in historical perspective’, in Théodore de Bèze, ed. Backus, I. (Geneva, 2007), 218–39.Google Scholar
Siraisi, N., Arts and sciences at Padua: the stadium of Padua before 1350 (Toronto, 1973).Google Scholar
Siraisi, N., ‘Giovanni Argenterio and sixteenth-century medical innovation: between princely patronage and academic controversy’, Osiris, 6 (1990), 161–80.Google Scholar
Siraisi, N. and Kibre, P., ‘The institutional setting: the universities’, in Science in the middle ages, ed. Lindberg, D. C. (Chicago, 1978), 120–44.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q., ‘Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas’, History and Theory, 8 (1969), 3–53.Google Scholar
Skoczylas, A., ‘Archibald Campbell’s Enquiry into the original of moral virtue, Presbyterian orthodoxy, and the Scottish enlightenment’, The Scottish Historical Review, 87 (2008), 68–100.Google Scholar
Slowik, E., ‘Newton’s metaphysics of space: a “tertium quid” betwixt substantivalism and relationism, or merely a “God of the (rational mechanical) gaps”?’, Perspectives on Science, 17 (2009), 429–56.Google Scholar
Slowik, E., ‘Newton’s neo-Platonic ontology of space’, Foundations of Science, 18 (2013), 419–48.Google Scholar
Slowik, E., The deep metaphysics of space (Cham, 2016).Google Scholar
Sluis, J. van, ‘Cartesian physics in two unpublished disputations by Pierre Bayle’, Bijdragen, tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie, 61 (2000), 123–35.Google Scholar
Sluis, J. van, ‘Twee Rotterdamse disputaties van Pierre Bayle, 1689 en 1690’, Geschiedenis van de wijsbegeerte in Nederland, 14 (2003), 209–47.Google Scholar
Smith, G. E., ‘How did Newton discover universal gravity?’, The St. John’s Review, 45.2 (1999), 32–63.Google Scholar
Smith, G. E., ‘Fluid resistance: why did Newton change his mind?’, in Foundations of Newtonian scholarship, ed. Dalitz, R. H. and Nauenberg, M. (Singapore, 2000), 105–36.Google Scholar
Smith, G. E., ‘The Newtonian style in Book II of the Principia’, in Isaac Newton’s natural philosophy, ed. Buchwald, J. and Cohen, I. B. (Cambridge, MA, 2001), 249–313.Google Scholar
Smith, G. E., ‘Comments on Ernan McMullin’s “The Impact of Newton’s Principia on the Philosophy of Science”’, Philosophy of Science, 68 (2001), 327–38.Google Scholar
Smith, G. E., ‘Closing the loop: testing Newtonian gravity, then and now’, in Newton and empiricism, ed. Biener, Z. and Schliesser, E. (Oxford, 2014), 262–351.Google Scholar
Smith, G. E., ‘The methodology of the Principia’, in The Cambridge companion to Isaac Newton, ed. Iliffe, R. and Smith, G. E., 2nd ed. (Cambridge, 2016), 187–228.Google Scholar
Smith, G. E., ‘Newton’s numerator in 1685: a year of gestation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 68 (2019), 163–77.Google Scholar
Snelders, H. A. M., ‘Christiaan Huygens and Newton’s theory of gravitation’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 43 (1989), 209–22.Google Scholar
Snobelen, S. D., ‘“God of Gods, and Lord of Lords”: the theology of Isaac Newton’s General Scholium to the Principia’, Osiris, 16 (2001), 169–208.Google Scholar
Snobelen, S. D., ‘Isaac Newton, Socinianism and “The One Supreme God”’, in Socinianism and Arminianism, ed. Mulsow, M. and Rohls, J. (Leiden, 2005), 241–98.Google Scholar
Snobelen, S. D., ‘William Whiston, Isaac Newton and the crisis of publicity’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 36 (2005), 573–603.Google Scholar
Snoeks, R., L’argument de tradition dans la controverse eucharistique entre catholiques et réformés français au XVIIe siècle (Louvain, 1951).Google Scholar
Solé, J., ‘La diplomatie de Louis XIV et les protestants français réfugiés aux Provinces-Unies’, Bulletin de la Société de l’histoire du protestantisme français, 115 (1969), 625–60.Google Scholar
Solé, J., ‘Les débuts de la collaboration entre Adriaan van Paets, protecteur de Pierre Bayle à Rotterdam, et le gouvernement de Louis XIV (1679–80)’, in De l’humanisme aux lumières: Bayle et le protestantisme, ed. Magdelaine, M. et al. (Paris, 1996), 477–94.Google Scholar
Solère, J.-L., ‘Un récit de philosophie-fiction: Le Voyage du Monde de M. Descartes, du P. Gabriel Daniel’, Uranie, 4 (1994), 153–84.Google Scholar
Solère, J.-L., ‘Tout plaisir rend-il heureux? Une querelle entre Arnauld, Malebranche et Bayle’, Chroniques de Port-Royal, 44 (1995), 351–79.Google Scholar
Somos, M., Secularization and the Leiden circle (Leiden, 2013).Google Scholar
Souza, E., ‘The Catholic enlightenment in Portugal’, in A companion to the Catholic enlightenment in Europe, ed. Lehner, U. and Printy, M. (Leiden, 2011), 359–402.Google Scholar
Sparn, W., Wiederkehr der Metaphysik: die ontologische Frage in der lutherischen Theologie des frühen 17. Jahrhunderts (Stuttgart, 1976).Google Scholar
Sparn, W., ‘Die Schulphilosophie in den lutherischen Territorien’, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts, ed. Holzhey, H. and Schmidt-Biggemann, W. (Basel, 2001), 475–606.Google Scholar
Spinks, B. D., Liturgy in the age of reason: worship and sacraments in England and Scotland, c.1662–c.1800 (Aldershot, 2008).Google Scholar
Sprunger, K. L. The learned Doctor William Ames: Dutch backgrounds of English and American Puritanism (Chicago, 1972).Google Scholar
Stam, F. P., The controversy over the theology of Saumur, 1635–1650 (Amsterdam, 1988).Google Scholar
Stan, M., ‘From metaphysical principles to dynamical laws’, in The Cambridge history of the philosophy of the scientific revolution, ed. Jalobeanu, D. and Miller, D. (Cambridge, 2022).Google Scholar
Stanglin, K. D., ‘The rise and fall of biblical perspicuity: Remonstrants and the transition toward modern exegesis’, Church History, 83 (2014), 38–59.Google Scholar
Stanglin, K. D., ‘Scientia media: the Protestant reception of a Jesuit idea’, in Beyond Dordt and De auxiliis, ed. Ballor, J. et al. (Leiden, 2019), 148–68.Google Scholar
Stauffenegger, R., Eglise et société: Genève au XVIIe siècle, 2 vols (Geneva, 1983–4).Google Scholar
Stauffer, R., L’Affaire d’Huisseau, une controverse protestante au sujet de la réunion des chrétiens (1670–1671) (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Stausberg, M., Faszination Zarathushtra: Zoroaster und die Europäische Religionsgeschichte der Frühen Neuzeit, 2 vols (Berlin, 2008).Google Scholar
Stegeman, S., Patronage and services in the republic of letters: the network of Theodorus Janssonius van Almeloveen (1657–1712) (Amsterdam, 2005).Google Scholar
Stein, H., ‘Newtonian space-time’, Texas Quarterly, 10 (1967), 174–200.Google Scholar
Stein, H., ‘On the notion of field in Newton, Maxwell, and beyond’, in Historical and philosophical perspectives of science, ed. Stuewer, R. H. (Minneapolis, 1970), 264–87.Google Scholar
Stein, H., ‘On philosophy and natural philosophy in the seventeenth century’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18 (1993), 177–201.Google Scholar
Stein, H., ‘Newton’s metaphysics’, in The Cambridge companion to Isaac Newton, ed. Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G. E. (Cambridge, 2002), 321–81.Google Scholar
Stewart, L., ‘Samuel Clarke, Newtonianism, and the factions of post-revolutionary England’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 42 (1981), 53–72.Google Scholar
Stewart, L., ‘Seeing through the Scholium: religion and reading Newton in the eighteenth century’, History of Science, 34 (1996), 123–65.Google Scholar
Stolberg, M., ‘Particles of the soul: the medical and Lutheran context of Daniel Sennert’s atomism’, Medicina nei Secoli, 15 (2003), 177–203.Google ScholarPubMed
Stolzenberg, D., Egyptian Oedipus: Athanasius Kircher and the secrets of antiquity (Chicago, 2013).Google Scholar
Stone, L., ‘The size and composition of the Oxford student body, 1580–1910’, in The university in society, ed. Stone, L., 2 vols (Princeton, 1974), i.3–110.Google Scholar
Storni, M., ‘Systematic thought and the early French enlightenment’, Rivista di storia della filosofia, 4 (2017), 629–40.Google Scholar
Strazzoni, A., Burchard de Volder and the age of the scientific revolution (Dordrecht, 2019).Google Scholar
Strazzoni, A., Dutch Cartesianism and the birth of philosophy of science (Berlin, 2019).Google Scholar
Stroup, A., A company of scientists: botany, patronage, and community at the seventeenth-century Parisian Royal Academy of Sciences (Berkeley, 1990).Google Scholar
Sturdy, D., Science and social status: the members of the Académie des sciences, 1666–1750 (Woodbridge, 1995).Google Scholar
Suárez-Nani, T., ‘Angels, space and place: the location of separate substances according to John Duns Scotus’, in Angels in medieval philosophical inquiry, ed. Iribarren, I. and Lenz, M. (Aldershot, 2008), 89–113.Google Scholar
Sudduth, M., The Reformed objection to natural theology (Aldershot, 2009).Google Scholar
Summers, K., Morality after Calvin: Theodore Beza’s Christian censor and Reformed ethics (Oxford, 2017).Google Scholar
Suppa, S., ‘L’antimachiavélisme de Thomas Bozio’, Corpus, 31 (1997), 145–73.Google Scholar
Sytsma, D. S., ‘Vermigli explicating Aquinas: an overlooked continuity in the doctrine of predestination’, Reformation and Renaissance Review, 20 (2018), 155–67.Google Scholar
Sytsma, D. S., ‘Aquinas in service of Dordt: John Davenant on predestination, grace, and free choice’, in Beyond Dordt and De auxiliis, ed. Ballor, J. et al. (Leiden, 2019), 169–98.Google Scholar
Tamm, M. and Burke, P., ed., Debating new approaches to history (London, 2018).Google Scholar
Tarantino, G., Lo scrittoio di Anthony Collins (1676–1729): i libri e i tempi di un libero pensatore (Milan, 2007).Google Scholar
Taton, R., Les origines de l’Académie royale des Sciences (Paris, 1966).Google Scholar
Terrall, M., The man who flattened the Earth: Maupertuis and the sciences in the enlightenment (Chicago, 2002).Google Scholar
Thackray, A., Atoms and powers: an essay on Newtonian matter-theory and the development of chemistry (Cambridge, MA, 1970).Google Scholar
Thijssen-Schoute, C. L., ‘Hermanus Lufneu, stadsarts te Rotterdam’, Rotterdams Jaarboekje, 8 (1960), 180–227.Google Scholar
Thomas, E., ‘Time, space, and process in Anne Conway’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25 (2017), 990–1010.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. D., ‘Michel de La Roche: a Huguenot critic of Calvin’, Studies in Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, vol. 238, ed. Mason, H. (Oxford, 1985), 97–195.Google Scholar
Ting Lai, T., ‘The linking of Spinoza to Chinese thought by Bayle and Malebranche’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 23 (1985), 151–78.Google Scholar
Tinguely, F., ‘Introduction’, in Un libertin dans l’Inde Moghole: les voyages de François Bernier (1656–1669), ed. Tinguely, F. (Paris, 2008), 7–36.Google Scholar
Tipton, S., ‘Defining “Our theology”: Amandus Polanus on the fundamental task of the theologian’, Journal of Reformed Theology, 10 (2016), 291–313.Google Scholar
Toomer, G. J., John Selden: a life in scholarship, 2 vols (Oxford, 2009).Google Scholar
Toribio Pérez, P., ‘El Nucleus historiae ecclesiasticae (Amsterdam, 1669) de Christoph Sand e los escritos en latín de Isaac Newton sobre historia de la Iglesia (ca. 1680): algunos indicios textuales de su conexión’, Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Monasteriensis, 15 (2015), 553–62.Google Scholar
Toribio Pérez, P., ‘Isaac Newton’s Latin notes on fourth-century ecclesiastical history in the Bodmer manuscript (Of the Church)’, Lias, 42 (2015), 121–33.Google Scholar
Touber, J., ‘Philology and theology: commenting the Old Testament in the Dutch Republic, 1650–1700’, in Neo-Latin commentaries and the management of knowledge, ed. Enenkel, K. and Nellen, H. (Leuven, 2013), 473–509.Google Scholar
Touber, J., ‘Biblical philology and hermeneutical debate in the Dutch Republic in the second half of the seventeenth century’, in Scriptural authority and biblical criticism in the Dutch Golden Age, ed. van Miert, D. et al. (Oxford, 2017), 325–50.Google Scholar
Touber, J., Spinoza and biblical philology in the Dutch Republic, 1660–1710 (Oxford, 2018).Google Scholar
Trabucco, O., ‘Telesian controversies on the winds and meteorology’, in Bernardino Telesio and the natural sciences in the Renaissance, ed. Omodeo, P. D. (Leiden, 2019), 96–115.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, H., History and the Enlightenment (New Haven, 2010).Google Scholar
Trinkaus, C., ‘Lorenzo Valla’s anti-Aristotelian natural philosophy’, I Tatti Studies: Essays in the Renaissance, 5 (1993), 279–325.Google Scholar
Tshibangu, T., Théologie positive et théologie spéculative: position traditionnelle et nouvelle problématique (Louvain, 1965).Google Scholar
Turchetti, M., ‘Elie Saurin (1639–1703) et ses Réflexions sur les droits de Conscience’, in The emergency of tolerance in the Dutch Republic, ed. Berkevens-Stevelinck, C. et al. (Leiden, 1997), 173–97.Google Scholar
Tutino, S., Shadows of doubt: language and truth in post-Reformation Catholic culture (Oxford, 2014).Google Scholar
Uzgalis, W., ‘Introduction’, in The correspondence of Samuel Clarke and Anthony Collins, 1707–8, ed. Uzgalis, W. (Peterborough, ON, 2011).Google Scholar
Vailati, E., ‘Clarke’s extended soul’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 31 (1993), 387–403.Google Scholar
Vailati, E., Leibniz and Clarke: a study of their correspondence (Oxford, 1997).Google Scholar
Valleriani, M., ‘The transformation of Aristotle’s Mechanical questions: a bridge between the Italian Renaissance architects and Galileo’s First New Science’, Annals of Science, 66 (2009), 183–208.Google Scholar
Van den Abbeel, Y., ‘The tension between the mathematical and metaphysical strands of Maupertuis’ principle of least action’, Noctua, 4 (2017), 56–90.Google Scholar
Vanneste, A., ‘Nature et grâce dans la théologie de Baius’ in Facultas S. Theologiae Lovaniensis 1432–1792, ed. van Eijl, E. J. M. (Louvain, 1977), 327–50.Google Scholar
Vasoli, C., ‘Tra Aristotele, Alessandro di Afrodisia e Juan de Valdés: note su Simone Porzio’, Rivista di storia della filosofia, 4 (2001), 562–607.Google Scholar
Vassányi, M., Anima mundi: the rise of the world soul in modern German philosophy (Dordrecht, 2011).Google Scholar
Verbeek, T., Descartes and the Dutch: early reactions to Cartesian philosophy, 1637–1650 (Carbondale, 1992).Google Scholar
Vercruysse, J., ‘Crellius, Le Cène, Naigeon ou les chemins de la tolérance socinienne’, Tijdschrift voor de Studie van de Verlichting, 1 (1973), 244–320.Google Scholar
Vincent, M., Le Mercure galant: présentation de la première revue féminine d’information et de culture, 1672–1710 (Paris, 2005).Google Scholar
Vliet, J. van, The rise of Reformed system: the intellectual heritage of William Ames (Milton Keynes, 2013).Google Scholar
Voak, N., ‘English Molinism in the late 1590s: Richard Hooker on free will, predestination, and divine foreknowledge’, Journal of Theological Studies, 60 (2009), 130–77.Google Scholar
Vogel, J., ‘Von der Wissenschafts- zur Wissensgeschichte: für eine Historisierung der Wissensgesellschaft’, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 30 (2004), 639–60.Google Scholar
Vollrath, E., ‘Die Gliederung der Metaphysik in eine Metaphysica generalis und eine Metaphysica specialis’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 16 (1962), 258–84.Google Scholar
Vuilleumier, H., Histoire de l’Eglise Réformée du Pays du Vaud sous le régime Bernois, 4 vols (Lausanne, 1927–33).Google Scholar
Waard, C. de, ‘Les objections de Pierre Petit contre le Discours et les Essais de Descartes’, Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 32 (1925), 53–89.Google Scholar
Walker, D. P., The decline of hell: seventeenth-century discussions of eternal torment (London, 1964).Google Scholar
Wallace, W. W., Galileo and his sources (Princeton, 1984).Google Scholar
Wallace, W. W., ‘Newton’s early writings: beginning of a new direction’, in Newton and the new direction in science, ed. Coyne, G. V. et al. (Vatican City, 1988), 23–44.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. J., ‘On Christian atheism’, Vigiliae Christianae, 45 (1991), 255–77.Google Scholar
Wanner, R., Claude Fleury (1640–1723) as an educational historiographer and thinker (The Hague, 1975).Google Scholar
Ward, T. M., John Duns Scotus on parts, wholes, and hylomorphism (Leiden, 2014).Google Scholar
Watson, R. A., The downfall of Cartesianism 1673–1712 (The Hague, 1966).Google Scholar
Wear, A., ‘William Harvey and the “way of anatomists”’, History of Science, 21 (1983), 223–49.Google Scholar
Webster, C., From Paracelsus to Newton: magic and the making of modern science (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
Weijers, O., Le travail intellectuel à la Faculté des arts de Paris: textes et maîtres (ca. 1200–1500), 9 vols (Turnhout, 1994–2012).Google Scholar
Weisheip, J. A., Nature and motion in the middle ages (Washington, DC, 1985).Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S., Force in Newton’s physics: the science of dynamics in the seventeenth century (London, 1971).Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S., Never at rest: a biography of Isaac Newton (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S., ‘Isaac Newton in Cambridge: the Restoration university and scientific creativity’, in Culture and politics from Puritanism to the enlightenment, ed. Zagorin, P. (Berkeley, 1980), 135–64.Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S., ‘Isaac Newton’s Theologiae gentilis origines philosophicae’, in The secular mind, ed. Warren Wagar, W. (New York, 1982), 15–32.Google Scholar
Westman, R., ‘The astronomer’s role in the sixteenth century: a preliminary study’, History of Science, 18 (1980), 105–47.Google Scholar
Whelan, R., ‘Between two worlds: the political theory of Jacques Abbadie (1656–1727)’, Lias, 14 (1987), 101–18, 143–56.Google Scholar
Whelan, R., The anatomy of superstition: a study of the historical theory and practice of Pierre Bayle (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Whelan, R., ‘République des Lettres et littérature: le jeune Bayle épistolier’, XVIIe siècle, 178 (1993), 71–86.Google Scholar
Whelan, R., ‘The wisdom of Simonides: Bayle and La Mothe Le Vayer’ in Scepticism and irreligion in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, ed. Popkin, R. and Vanderjagt, A. (Leiden, 1993), 230–53.Google Scholar
White, G., Luther as Nominalist (Helsinki, 1994).Google Scholar
Whiteside, D. T., ‘Before the Principia: the maturing of Newton’s thoughts on dynamical astronomy’, Journal of the History of Astronomy, 1 (1970), 5–19.Google Scholar
Whiteside, D. T., ‘Newton’s lunar theory: from high hopes to disenchantment’, Vistas in Astronomy, 19 (1976), 317–28.Google Scholar
Whiteside, D. T., ‘The prehistory of the Principia from 1664 to 1686’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 45 (1991), 11–61.Google Scholar
Whitmore, P. J. S., ‘Bayle’s criticism of Locke’, in Pierre Bayle, le philosophe de Rotterdam, ed. Dibon, P. (Amsterdam, 1959), 81–96.Google Scholar
Wickenden, N., G. J. Vossius and the humanist concept of history (Assen, 1993).Google Scholar
Wightman, W. P. D., ‘David Gregory’s commentary on Newton’s Principia’, Nature, 179 (1957), 393–4.Google Scholar
Williams, A., The common expositor: an account of the commentaries on Genesis, 1527–1633 (Chapel Hill, 1948).Google Scholar
Wilmott, M. J., ‘Francesco Patrizi da Cherso’s humanist critique of Aristotle’. PhD thesis, The Warburg Institute, London (1984).Google Scholar
Wilson, C. A., ‘From Kepler’s laws, so-called, to universal gravitation: empirical factors’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 6 (1970), 89–170.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. A., ‘Newton’s path to the Principia’, in The great ideas today (Chicago, 1988), 178–229.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. A., ‘The Newtonian achievement in astronomy’, in The general history of astronomy, vol. II, Part A, ed. Taton, R. and Wilson, C. (Cambridge, 1989), 233–74.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. A., ‘Euler on action-at-a-distance and fundamental equations in continuum mechanics’, in The investigation of difficult things, ed. Harman, P. M. and Shapiro, A. E. (Cambridge, 1992), 399–442.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. A., ‘Redoing Newton’s experiment for establishing the proportionality of mass and weight’, St John’s Review, 45.2 (1999), 64–73.Google Scholar
Winstanley, D. A., Unreformed Cambridge (Cambridge, 1935).Google Scholar
Witte, J., ‘A demonstrative theory of natural law: Johannes Althusius and the rise of Calvinist jurisprudence’, Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 11 (2009), 248–65.Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. T., ‘Vitalism without metaphysics? Medical vitalism in the enlightenment’, Science in Context, 21 (2008), 461–3.Google Scholar
Wolfson, H. A., ‘The problem of the souls of the spheres from the Byzantine commentaries on Aristotle through the Arabs and St. Thomas to Kepler’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 16 (1962), 65–93.Google Scholar
Wollenschläger, K., ‘Der mathematische Briefwechsel zwischen Johann I Bernoulli und Abraham de Moivre’, Verhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Basel, 43 (1933), 151–317.Google Scholar
Wootton, D., The invention of science: a new history of the scientific revolution (London, 2015).Google Scholar
Wundt, M., Die deutsche Schulmetaphysik des 17. Jahrhunderts (Tübingen, 1939).Google Scholar
Wyngaert, A. van den, ‘Mgr. Fr. Pallu et Mgr. Bernardin della Chiesa: le Serment de Fidélité aux Vicaires Apostoliques 1680–1688’, Archivum Franciscanum historicum, 31 (1938), 17–47.Google Scholar
Yoffie, A., ‘Biblical literalism and scholarship in Protestant Northern Europe, 1630–1700’. PhD thesis, Harvard University (2009).Google Scholar
Yolton, J., John Locke and the way of ideas (Oxford, 1956).Google Scholar
Zehe, H., Die Gravitationstheorie des Nicolas Fatio de Duillier (Hildesheim, 1980).Google Scholar
Zilsel, E., The social origins of modern science (Dordrecht, 2000).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A., Ontologie oder Metaphysik? Die Diskussion über den Gegenstand der Metaphysik im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert, 2nd ed. (Louvain, 1998).Google Scholar
Zuidema, J., ‘The primacy of scripture in Peter Martyr Vermigli’s understanding of theological education’, in Konfession, Migration und Elitenbildung, ed. Selderhuis, H. J. (Leiden, 2007), 99–108.Google Scholar
Zupko, J., John Buridan: portrait of a fourteenth-century arts master (Notre Dame, 2003).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Dmitri Levitin, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Kingdom of Darkness
  • Online publication: 23 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108934152.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Dmitri Levitin, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Kingdom of Darkness
  • Online publication: 23 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108934152.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Dmitri Levitin, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Kingdom of Darkness
  • Online publication: 23 March 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108934152.018
Available formats
×