Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: bUingualism aod language contact
- I Sodal aspects of tbe bilingual community
- II The bilingual speaker
- III Language use in the bilingual community
- IV Linguistic consequences
- References
- Index to languages and countries
- Subject index
- Author index
- Miscellaneous Endmatter
11 - Strategies of neutrality
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: bUingualism aod language contact
- I Sodal aspects of tbe bilingual community
- II The bilingual speaker
- III Language use in the bilingual community
- IV Linguistic consequences
- References
- Index to languages and countries
- Subject index
- Author index
- Miscellaneous Endmatter
Summary
When you call train information in Toronto, the automatic answering tape says HERE VIA RAIL/IC! VIA RAIL, underlining the cernpany's wish to present itself as a truly narional enterprise in a bilingual nation. In th e same way the national government in Canada is carefut (O preserve neutrality, in its policies and publications, with respect to bath the Engiish-speaking and the French-speaking population. The way in which neutraliry is achieved is by using bath languages, but this language doubling is but one ofthe strategies that cao be employed to be neutral. This chaprer is devoted (O a more systematic exploration of these strategies.
The term ‘strategy of neutrality’ was introduced into sociolinguistics by Scotton (1976), who described intertribal interaction in urban Africa. Be10w we return in more detail to her research. Here we wiJl use ‘neutrality’ in rather loose sense and perhaps ambiguously, to describe two types of neutrality:
- neurralization in in-group communication, which may be schematically represented as:
(I) A/B → X ← AlB.
In this type of neutralization, a ‘neutral’ communicative mode expresses a group's mixed ethnolinguistic identity.
- neutralization of the communicative mode in situaticns of intergroup communication in which two groups ofspeakers with clearly separate ethnolinguistic identities do nor speak the same language. This type of neutralization may be schematically represented as:
(2) A → X ← B
Here X refers to the strategy ofneutrality, andA and B to the languages and identities ofthe speakers involved in the interaction. This second interpreration of neutrality is the one intended by Scotron (1976).
In this chepter we wil! descrtbe the strategies in terms of these two types: neutralization of identity in section 11.1, and neutralization of communicative mode in 11.2, before anempting a more general perspective on neutraliry in sociolinguistics, in section 11.3. We should say right away that the way ‘neutrality’ was used in chapter 10 on code switching was rather different. There we referred to rhe points of neurrality between the structures ofthe two languages involved in code switching, a farm of grammatical neutrality.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language Contact and Bilingualism , pp. 129 - 137Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2006