Aoshima, Sachiko, Yoshida, Masaya, and Phillips, Collin. 2009. “Incremental Processing of Coreference and Binding in Japanese,” Syntax 12.2: 93–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariew, Roger. 1984. “The Duhem Thesis,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35: 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, Chris. 2012. “Quantificational Binding Does Not Require C-Command,” Linguistic Inquiry 43.4: 614–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric. 2006. Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, Concepts, Methods, and Aims, Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1955/1975. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1962. “Various Discussion Sessions.” In: Hill, A. A. (ed.), Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English, University of Texas, Austin, pp. 22–33.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought, Harper & Row, New York and London.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1975. Reflections on Language, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1976. “Conditions on Rules of Grammar.” Linguistic Analysis 2.4: 303–351.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Generative Enterprise, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory.” In: Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. “Language and Nature,” Mind 104: 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2004. The Generative Enterprise Revisited, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2012. The Science of Language: Interview with James McGilvray, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duhem, Pierre. 1906/1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton. (The original publication in French in 1906, its original English translation in 1954, and its renewed edition in 1982. The page references are to the 1982 edition.)Google Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul. 1975. Against Method, New Left Books, London.Google Scholar

Feynman, Richard. 1963. Six Easy Pieces, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar

Feynman, Richard. 1965/1994. The Character of Physical Law, The Modern Library, New York. (The page references are to the 1994 edition.)Google Scholar

Feynman, Richard. 1999. The Pleasure of Finding Things Out, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar

Feynman, Richard, Leighton, Robert, and Sands, Matthew. 1963. The Feynman Lectures on Physics Volume 1, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.Google Scholar

Gordon, Peter C. and Hendrick, Randall. 1997. “Intuitive Knowledge of Linguistic Co-Reference,” Cognition 62: 325–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hankamer, Jorge and Sag, Ivan. 1976. “Deep and Surface Anaphora,” Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.Google Scholar

Harada, S.-I. 1976. “Quantifier Float as a Relational Rule,” Metropolitan Linguistics 1: 44–49.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Nobuko. 1993. “Floating Quantifiers and Bare NP Expressions.” In: Hasegawa, N. (ed.), Japanese Syntax in Comparative Grammar, Kurosio Syuppan, Tokyo, pp. 115–145.Google Scholar

Hayashishita, J.-R. 1997. “On the Scope Ambiguity in the Scrambling Construction in Japanese,” unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Hayashishita, J.-R.. 2000. “Scope Ambiguity and Scrambling,” in Proceedings of WCCFLXIX, pp. 204–217, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA.Google Scholar

Hayashishita, J.-R.. 2004. Syntactic and Non-Syntactic Scope, Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California (available at: http://www.enteroflora.com/linguistics/dissertation.html).Google Scholar

Hayashishita, J.-R.. 2008. “On Adnominal ‘Focus-Sensitive’ Particles,” Japanese/Korean Linguistics 13, pp. 243–254, CSLI Publications. (Edited by M. E. Hudson, P. Sells, and S.-A. Jun.)Google Scholar

Hayashishita, J.-R.. 2013. “On the Nature of Inverse Scope Readings,” Gengo Kenkyu 143 (March): 29–68.Google Scholar

Hayashishita, J.-R. and Ueyama, Ayumi. 2012. “Quantity Expressions in Japanese.” In: Keenan, E. and Paperno, D. (eds.), Handbook of Quantifiers in Natural Language, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 535–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higginbotham, James. 1980. “Pronouns and Bound Variables,” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 679–708.Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese, Doctoral dissertation, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 1991. “KARE.” In: Georgopoulos, C. and Ishihara, R. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in Honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 1995. “Demonstrative Binding and Principle B.” In: Beckman, J. N. (ed.), Proceedings of 25th North Eastern Linguistic Society, GLSA, Linguistics Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, pp. 255–271. (Reprinted in Hoji 2013.)Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 1997a. “Sloppy Identity and Principle B.” In: Bennis, H., Pica, P., and Rooryck, J. (eds.), Atomism and Binding, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 205–235. (Reprinted in Hoji 2013.)Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 1997b. “Sloppy Identity and Formal Dependency,” Proceedings of the 15th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, pp. 209–223. (Reprinted in Hoji 2013.)Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 1998a. “Null Object and Sloppy Identity in Japanese,” Linguistic Inquiry 29: 127–152. (Reprinted in Hoji 2013.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 1998b. “Formal Dependency, Organization of Grammar and Japanese Demonstratives.” In: Akatsuka, N., Hoji, H., Iwasaki, S., Sohn, S.-O., and Strauss, S. (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 7, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, pp. 649–677. (Reprinted in Hoji 2013.)Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 2003a. “Falsifiability and Repeatability in Generative Grammar: A Case Study of Anaphora and Scope Dependency in Japanese,” Lingua 113: 377–446. (Reprinted in Hoji 2013.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 2003b. “Surface and Deep Anaphora, Sloppy Identity, and Experiments in Syntax.” In: Barss, A. (ed.), Anaphora: A Reference Guide, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 172–236. (Reprinted in Hoji 2013.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 2006a. “Assessing Competing Analyses: Two Hypotheses about ‘Scrambling’ in Japanese.” In Ueyama, Ayumied.), Theoretical and Empirical Studies of Reference and Anaphora: Toward the Establishment of Generative Grammar as an Empirical Science. A report of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Project No. 15320052, pp. 139–185. Kyushu University (available at: http://www.gges.org/hoji/research/hp-papers.cgi).Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 2006b. “Otagai.” In: Ayumi, Ueyama (ed.), Theoretical and Empirical Studies of Reference and Anaphora: Toward the Establishment of Generative Grammar as an Empirical Science. A report of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Project No. 15320052, pp. 126–138. Kyushu University (available at: http://www.gges.org/hoji/research/hp-papers.cgi).Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 2009. A Foundation of Generative Grammar as an Empirical Science, Unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 2010. “Hypothesis Testing in Generative Grammar: Evaluations of Predicted Schematic Asymmetries,” Journal of Japanese Linguistics 16: Special issue: In Memory of S.-Y. Kuroda, pp. 25–52.Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime. 2013. (eds. Takubo, Yukinori and Ueyama, Ayumi) Gengo kagaku-o mezasite (Toward Linguistic Science): Issues on Anaphora in Japanese, Ohsumi Shoten, Shiga, Japan.Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime and Ishii, Yasuo. 2004. “What Gets Mapped to the Tripartite Structure of Quantification in Japanese,” Proceedings of 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA, pp. 101–114.Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime, Kinsui, Satoshi, Takubo, Yukinori, and Ueyama, Ayumi. 1999. “Demonstratives, Bound Variables, and Reconstruction Effects,” Proceedings of the Nanzan GLOW, The Second GLOW Meeting in Asia, September 19–22, 1999, pp. 141–158.Google Scholar

Hoji, Hajime, Kinsui, Satoshi, Takubo, Yukinori, and Ueyama, Ayumi. 2003. “Demonstratives in Modern Japanese.” In: Li, Audrey and Simpson, Andrew (eds.), Functional Structure(s), Form and Interpretation: Perspectives from East Asian Languages, Routledge, London, pp. 97–128.Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1988. “Comments on Hasegawa's Paper.” In: Tawa, W. and Nakayama, M. (eds.), Proceedings of Japanese Syntax Workshop: Issues on Empty Categories, Japanese Program Connecticut College, New London, CT.Google Scholar

Kataoka, Kiyoko. 2006. Nihongo hiteibun-no koozoo – kakimazebun to hitei kooo hyoogen (The Syntactic Structure of Japanese Negative Sentences: Scrambling Construction and Negation-sensitive Elements). Kurosio Syuppan, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi and Takubo, Yukinori. 1992. “Nihongo sizisi kenkyuusi kara/e” (From/Toward a History of Research on Japanese Demonstratives). In: Kinsui, Satoshi and Takubo, Yukinori (eds.), Sizisi (Demonstratives), Hituzi Syobo, Tokyo, pp. 151–192.Google Scholar

Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 1990. “Anti-Scrambling,” Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester.Google Scholar

Klima, Edward S. 1964. “Negation in English.” In: Fodor, J. and Katz, J. (eds.), The Structure of Language, Princeton-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 246–323.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Kuroda, S.-Y. 1979. “(Ko), so, a nituite” (On (ko-), so- and a-). In: Eigo to nihongo to (English and Japanese), Kurosio Syuppan, Tokyo, pp. 41–59.Google Scholar

Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In: Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91–195. (Reprinted as Lakatos 1978: chapter 1.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical papers volume 1 ed. Worrall, John and Currie, Gregory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1969. “On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command.” Reibel, D. and Schane, S. (eds.), Modern Studies in English, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 160–186.Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 1976. “Remarks on Coreference,” Linguistic Analysis 2: 1–22.Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 1989. “On the Necessity of Binding Conditions.” In: Essays on Anaphora, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 149–167. (Reprinted as Lasnik 1991.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 1990. “Syntax.” In: Osherson, D. N. and Lasnik, H. (eds.), Language: An Invitation to Cognitive Science Volume 1, A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 5–21.Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 1991. “On the Necessity of Binding Conditions.” In Freidin, R. (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 7–28.Google Scholar

Lindley, David. 2008. Uncertainty: Einstein, Heisenberg, Bohr, and the Struggle for the Soul of Science, Anchor Books, New York.Google Scholar

Ludlow, Peter. 2011. The Philosophy of Generative Linguistics, Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsushita, Daizaburoo. 1930/1977. Hyoozyun nihongo hoo (The Usage of the Standard Japanese), Benseisya, Tokyo. (The original 1930 publication was from Tyuubunkan Syoten.)Google Scholar

Matsushita, Daizaburoo. 1930. Kaisen hyoozyun nippon bunpoo (Revised Standard Japanese Grammar), Tyuubunkan Syoten, Tokyo. (Reissued by Benseisya, Tokyo, 1978.)Google Scholar

Meehl, E. Paul. 1967. “Theory Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox,” Philosophy of Science 34: 103–115. (Reprinted in Morrison and Henkel 1970/2007.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru and Arikawa, Koji. 2007. “Locality in Syntax and Floating Numeral Quantifiers,” Linguistic Inquiry 38: 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrison, E. Denton and Henkel, E. Ramon (eds.). 1970/2007. The Significance Test Controversy, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ .Google Scholar

Mukai, Emi. 2011. “Bound Variable Construal with a ‘Discontinuous’ Binder,” Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL), pp. 221–236.Google Scholar

Mukai, Emi. 2012. Binding and Scope Dependencies with “Floating Quantifiers” in Japanese, Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, J. Fredrick. 2008. “A Review of Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, Concepts, Methods, and Aims. by Cedric Boeckx,” Language 84: 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1986. Quantification in Syntax, Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara. 1978. “Bound Variables and Other Anaphors,” Proceedings of TINLAP 2, University of Illinois, pp. 79–85. (Reprinted in Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers by Barbara H. Partee, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA, 2004, pp. 110–121.)Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara. 1989. “Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts,” Papers from the Twenty-Fifth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 342–365. (Reprinted in Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers by Barbara Partee, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA, 2004, pp. 259–281.)Google Scholar

Peterson, Aage. 1963. “The Philosophy of Niels Bohr,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, September: 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pica, Pierre and Snyder, William. 1995. “Weak Crossover, Scope, and Agreement in a Minimalist Framework,” Proceedings of 13th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI, Stanford, CA, pp. 334–349.Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert J. and Sharma, Devyani (eds.) 2013. Research Methods in Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Poincaré, Henri. 1952. Science and Hypothesis, Dover Publications, New York. (The English translation of La science et l'hypothèse (1902).)Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. 1963. “Science: Problems, Aims, Responsibilities,” Federation Proceedings (Baltimore), Federations of American Societies of Experimental Biology 22.4: 961–972.Google ScholarPubMed

Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora, Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tayna. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tayna. 1987. “Specifier and Operator Binding.” In: Reuland, E. and ter Meulen, A. (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 130–167.Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax, Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru. 1981. “Notes on Anaphora in Japanese (I),” Unpublished manuscript, MIT.Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru. 1989. “Scrambling as Semantically Vacuous A’-movement.” In: Baltin, Mark R. and Kroch, Anthony S. (eds.), Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 182–200.Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru. 2003. “A Derivational Approach to the Interpretation of Scrambling Chains,” Lingua 113: 481–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sakuma, Kanae. 1936/1983. Gendai nihongo no hyoogen to gohoo (Expressions and Usages in Modern Japanese), Kurosio Syuppan, Tokyo. (The original 1936 publication was from Kooseisya Kooseikaku, Tokyo.)Google Scholar

Schütze, Carson. 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Schütze, Carson and Sprouse, Jon. 2013. “Judgment Data.” In: Podesva, Robert J. and Sharma, Devyani (eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 27–50.Google Scholar

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1977. “Grammatical Relations and Surface Cases,” Language 53: 789–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Takubo, Yukinori and Kinsui, Satoshi. 1996. “Hukusuu no sinteki-ryooiki niyoru danwa-kanri” (Discourse Management in Terms of Multiple Mental Domains), Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society 3.3: 59–74.Google Scholar

Takubo, Yukinori and Kinsui, Satoshi. 1997. “Discourse Management in Terms of Mental Spaces,” Journal of Pragmatics 28.6: 741–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Townsend, J. David and Bever, G. Thomas. 2001. Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ueyama, Ayumi. 1998. Two Types of Dependency, Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California (distributed by GSIL publications, University of Southern California). (Available at http://www.gges.org/hoji/research/hp-Ayumi.cgi under “Dissertation: Two Types of Dependency 1998 USC.”)Google Scholar

Ueyama, Ayumi. 2003. “Two Types of Scrambling Constructions.” In: Barss, A. (ed.), Anaphora: A Reference Guide, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 23–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ueyama, Ayumi. 2010. “Model of Judgment Making and Hypotheses in Generative Grammar.” In: Iwasaki, Shoichi, Hoji, Hajime, Clancy, Patricia, and Sohn, Sung-Ock (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 17, CSLI, Stanford, CA: 27–47. (Available at: http://www.gges.org/hoji/research/hp-Ayumi.cgi).Google Scholar

Wasow, Thomas. 1972. Anaphoric Relations in English, Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1977. “Discourse and Logical Form,” Linguistic Inquiry 8: 101–139.Google Scholar

Yoshimura, Noriko. 1988. “Comments on Stowell's Paper,” a talk presented at UCSD Workshop on Japanese and Logical Form.Google Scholar