Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T08:14:29.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Trade Law Implications of Procurement Practices in Sustainable Energy Goods and Services: September 2012

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Gary C. Hufbauer
Affiliation:
Peterson Institute of International Economics, Washington DC
Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz
Affiliation:
International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICSTD), Geneva
Richard Samans
Affiliation:
World Economic Forum
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

ICTSD (2011) Fostering Low Carbon Growth: The Case for a Sustainable Energy Trade Agreement. GenevaGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Matthew (2012) Legal Options for a Sustainable Energy Trade Agreement. GenevaGoogle Scholar
Monkelbaan, Joachim (2013) Sustainable Energy Services in a SETA. GenevaGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

Anderson, Robert and Arrowsmith, Sue (eds.) (2011) The WTO Regime on Government Procurement – Challenge and Reform. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Arrowsmith, Sue (ed.) (2010) Public Procurement Regulation: An Introduction. EU Asia Inter University Network for Teaching and Research in Public Procurement Regulation, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
Malumfashi, Garba Ibrahim (2010) ‘Green’ Public Procurement Policies, Climate Change Mitigation and International Trade Regulation: An Assessment of the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement. University of DundeeGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Robert (2007) ‘Renewing the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement: progress to date and ongoing negotiations’, Public Procurement Law, 16 (4): 255273Google Scholar
Anderson, Robert and Osei-Lah, Kodjo (2011) ‘Forging a global procurement market: issues concerning accessions to the agreement on government procurement’, in Anderson, Robert and Arrowsmith, Sue (eds.), The WTO Regime on Government Procurement – Challenge and Reform. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Arrowsmith, Sue (2002) ‘Reviewing the GPA: the role and development of the plurilateral agreement after Doha’, Journal of International Economic Law, 5 (4): 761790Google Scholar
Brammer, Stephen and Walker, Helen (2007) Sustainable Procurement Practice in the Public Sector: An International Comparative Study. University of BathGoogle Scholar
Brenton, James, Dawar, Kamala and Kuntze, Jan-Cristoph (2011) Issues and Tensions in Public Procurement of ‘Green Innovation’: A Cross-Country Study. Working Paper of the Centre for Trade and Economic Integration, Geneva, JuneGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, Lina and Waara, Fredrik (2006) ‘Environmental concerns in Swedish local government procurement’, in Thai, Khi and Piga, Gustavo (eds.), Advancing Public Procurement. PrAcademics Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
Colverson, Samuel and Pereira, Oshani (2012) Harnessing the Power of Public–Private Partnerships: The Role of Hybrid Financing Strategies in Sustainable Development. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), GenevaGoogle Scholar
Davies, Arwell (2011) ‘The national treatment and exceptions provisions of the Agreement on Government Procurement and the Pursuit of Horizontal Policies’, in Anderson, Robert and Arrowsmith, Sue (eds.), The WTO Regime on Government Procurement – Challenge and Reform. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
De Graaf, Gerard and King, Matthew (1995) ‘Towards a more global procurement market: the expansion of the GATT Government Agreement in the context of the Uruguay Round’, International Lawyer, 29 (2): 435452Google Scholar
Dischendorfer, Martin (2000) ‘The existence and development of multilateral rules on government procurement under the framework of the WTO’, Public Procurement Law Review, 9: 138Google Scholar
Fuguo, Cao (2008) ‘China’s government procurement policy and framework: history, structure and operation’, in Thai, Khi V. (ed.), International Handbook of Public procurement. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
Guimarães De Lima e Silva, Valéria (2008) ‘The revision of the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement: to what extent might it contribute to the expansion of current membership?’, Public Procurement Law Review, 17 (2): 6198Google Scholar
Ju, Meiting et al. (2009) Public Green Procurement in China: Development Course, Program Management and Technical Methods, Sustainable Public Procurement in Urban Administration in China: An Action under Europe Aid’s SWITCH-Asian Program Paper, No. 02-EN/CHGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, Victoria (2011) ‘Sustainable energy procurement recommendations for schools’, 2 February 2011, www.environmentalleader.com/2011/02/02/sustainable-energy-procurement-recommendations for schools/Google Scholar
Kreycik, Claire et al. (2011) Procurement Options for New Renewable Electricity Supply. NREL, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, Christopher (2004) ‘Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes’, Natural Resources Forum, 28: 257267Google Scholar
Nyiri, L. et al. (2007) Public Procurement for the Promotion of R&D and Innovation in ICT. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Qiao, Yuaha and Wang, Conghu (2011) China Green Public Procurement Program: Issues and Challenges in Its Implementation. China Agricultural UniversityGoogle Scholar
Japan – Procurement of a Navigation Satellite, Request for Consultations by the European Communities, DS73/1, 26 March 1997Google Scholar
Korea – Measures Affecting Government Procurement (Procurement Practices of the Korean Airport Construction Authority), Panel report, WT/DS163/R, 1 May 2000Google Scholar
Report of the WTO Committee on Government Procurement to the General Council, GPA/89, 11 December 2006Google Scholar
United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, WT/DS58/AB/R, Appellate Body Report, 10 August 1998Google Scholar
United States – Measures Affecting Government Procurement (Massachusetts State Law Prohibiting Contracts with firms doing Business with or in Myanmar), Request for Consultations by the European Communities, DS88/1, 20 June 1997, and Japan (DS95), 18 July 1997Google Scholar
Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, OJ 1992 L 209/1Google Scholar
Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors, OJ L 134, 30 April 2004: 1Google Scholar
Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, OJ L 134, 30 April 2004: 114Google Scholar
Buying Green! A Handbook on Green Public Procurement, 2nd edn., 2011, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/handbook.pdfGoogle Scholar
(2004) Integration of Environmental Aspects of European Standardization, COM(2004) 130, 30 January 2004Google Scholar
Public Procurement for a Better Environment, COM/2008/0400 final, 2 July 2008Google Scholar
Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan, COM(2008) 397 final, 16 July 2008Google Scholar
Case C-225/98, Commission v. France (‘Nord-pas-de-Calais’) [2000] ECR I-7445Google Scholar
Case C-448/01, EVN AG and Wienstrom GmbH v. Austria (‘EVN’) [2003] ECR I-14527Google Scholar
Case C-513/99, Concordia Bus Finland Oy Ab v. Helsingin Kaupunki and HKL-Bussiliikenne (‘Concordia Buses’) [2002] ECR I-7213Google Scholar
EC – Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, WT/DS291/R, 29 September 2006Google Scholar
Standing Committee of the 11th National People’s Congress (NPC) of the People’s Republic of China, Circular Economy Law of the People’s Republic of China, 29 August 2008Google Scholar
UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement, Official Records of the General Assembly, 66th Session, Supplement No. 17 (A/66/17)Google Scholar
UNCITRAL Secretariat, Revised Guide to Enactment to Accompany to UNICITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement, A/CN.9/WG.I/WP.79 cong. (W. G. I), 13 June 2012Google Scholar
US Supreme Court, Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council, 530 US 363, 2000Google Scholar
Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, OJ 1992 L 209/1Google Scholar
Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors, OJ L 134, 30 April 2004: 1Google Scholar
Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, OJ L 134, 30 April 2004: 114Google Scholar
Buying Green! A Handbook on Green Public Procurement, 2nd edn., 2011, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/handbook.pdfGoogle Scholar
(2004) Integration of Environmental Aspects of European Standardization, COM(2004) 130, 30 January 2004Google Scholar
Public Procurement for a Better Environment, COM/2008/0400 final, 2 July 2008Google Scholar
Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan, COM(2008) 397 final, 16 July 2008Google Scholar
Case C-225/98, Commission v. France (‘Nord-pas-de-Calais’) [2000] ECR I-7445Google Scholar
Case C-448/01, EVN AG and Wienstrom GmbH v. Austria (‘EVN’) [2003] ECR I-14527Google Scholar
Case C-513/99, Concordia Bus Finland Oy Ab v. Helsingin Kaupunki and HKL-Bussiliikenne (‘Concordia Buses’) [2002] ECR I-7213Google Scholar
EC – Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, WT/DS291/R, 29 September 2006Google Scholar
Standing Committee of the 11th National People’s Congress (NPC) of the People’s Republic of China, Circular Economy Law of the People’s Republic of China, 29 August 2008Google Scholar
UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement, Official Records of the General Assembly, 66th Session, Supplement No. 17 (A/66/17)Google Scholar
UNCITRAL Secretariat, Revised Guide to Enactment to Accompany to UNICITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement, A/CN.9/WG.I/WP.79 cong. (W. G. I), 13 June 2012Google Scholar
US Supreme Court, Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council, 530 US 363, 2000Google Scholar
Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, OJ 1992 L 209/1Google Scholar
Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors, OJ L 134, 30 April 2004: 1Google Scholar
Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, OJ L 134, 30 April 2004: 114Google Scholar
Buying Green! A Handbook on Green Public Procurement, 2nd edn., 2011, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/handbook.pdfGoogle Scholar
(2004) Integration of Environmental Aspects of European Standardization, COM(2004) 130, 30 January 2004Google Scholar
Public Procurement for a Better Environment, COM/2008/0400 final, 2 July 2008Google Scholar
Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan, COM(2008) 397 final, 16 July 2008Google Scholar
Case C-225/98, Commission v. France (‘Nord-pas-de-Calais’) [2000] ECR I-7445Google Scholar
Case C-448/01, EVN AG and Wienstrom GmbH v. Austria (‘EVN’) [2003] ECR I-14527Google Scholar
Case C-513/99, Concordia Bus Finland Oy Ab v. Helsingin Kaupunki and HKL-Bussiliikenne (‘Concordia Buses’) [2002] ECR I-7213Google Scholar
EC – Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, WT/DS291/R, 29 September 2006Google Scholar
Standing Committee of the 11th National People’s Congress (NPC) of the People’s Republic of China, Circular Economy Law of the People’s Republic of China, 29 August 2008Google Scholar
UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement, Official Records of the General Assembly, 66th Session, Supplement No. 17 (A/66/17)Google Scholar
UNCITRAL Secretariat, Revised Guide to Enactment to Accompany to UNICITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement, A/CN.9/WG.I/WP.79 cong. (W. G. I), 13 June 2012Google Scholar
US Supreme Court, Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council, 530 US 363, 2000Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×