Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-xkcpr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:23:29.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - A proposal to introduce an Advocate General's position into WTO dispute settlement

from PART II - Insights into the World Trade Organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

A. L. C. De Mestral
Affiliation:
Co-Director of the Institute of European Studies McGill University Montréal Canada
M. Auerbach-Ziogas
Affiliation:
McGill University Montréal Canada
Steve Charnovitz
Affiliation:
George Washington University, Washington DC
Debra P. Steger
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Peter Van den Bossche
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Thanks to the legal statesmanship of members of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Appellate Body and to support of WTO members, the legal procedures established under the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU) have enjoyed very considerable success. But the DSU remains a work in progress. Much can still be done to develop and refine this process. A host of issues, some reflecting policy choices, some more strictly legal, remain to be resolved. By no means have all the concerns of negotiators in 1994 been answered. Some have proven to be well-founded, and new problems have arisen which challenge both the procedures and the rules of the DSU. As a contribution to the search for solutions, this chapter proposes the creation of a new position attached to the DSU process – that of the Advocate General.

The Advocate General (AG) would participate in WTO dispute settlement procedures. A roster of Advocates General should be created to serve both panels and the Appellate Body. Given the nature of the function, the roster should be composed exclusively of jurists, knowledgeable in WTO procedure and law, and would be selected by the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). An AG would be designated to follow each dispute. His or her principal function would be to participate in the dispute settlement procedures from the point that a panel is constituted to the point that the Appellate Body has rendered its decision.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law in the Service of Human Dignity
Essays in Honour of Florentino Feliciano
, pp. 159 - 180
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×