Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T21:39:10.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Electronic commerce and the law of contract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Alan Davidson
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

Commerce is typically about profit. The history and development of commerce involves the element of risk. Risk assessment in commerce involves consideration of such factors as the law of contracts, the parties, the goods or services and legal forum. Many commercial parties have braved the new electronic commerce world without knowing or understanding the legal implications.

In an attempt to ensure confidence, many international organisations have proposed treaties, model laws and protocols to encourage certainty and stability for these international electronic commercial practices and in relation to laws of contract. The UNCITRAL Model Law of Electronic Commerce (Model Law) has proved the most popular, with significant international acceptance by national legislatures, including Australia and New Zealand.

This chapter addresses the regulation of, and legislative responses to, electronic contracting. It challenges the wisdom of and necessity for legislation based on the Model Law, and the introduction of the concept of consent as a precondition for the application of selected legislative provisions.

UNCITRAL Model Law of Electronic Commerce

In 1996 the UN Commission on International Law Trade (UNCITRAL) released what is now the most popular model for consumer and commercial protection in an electronic environment. The UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce (Model Law) was intended to provide national legislatures with a template of internationally acceptable rules that would remove legal obstacles and create a more secure legal environment for electronic commerce.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Christensen, Sharon, Duncan, William and Low, Rouhshi, ‘The requirements of writing for electronic land contracts – the Queensland experience compared with other jurisdictions’, (2003) 10(3) E Law – Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law (MurUEJL), www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v10n3/christensen103.html.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Henry, ‘The new United States Uniform Electronic Transactions Act: Substantive provisions, drafting history and comparison to the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce’; www.unidroit.org/english/publications/review/articles/2000-4.htm. The author was a Commissioner on the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws at the time of the drafting.
Wang, Minyan, ‘The impact of information technology development on the legal concept – a particular examination on the legal concept of “signatures”’, (2006) 15(3) International Journal of Law and Information Technology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, D, ‘Comment: Avoiding the un-real estate deal: Has the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act gone too far?’, (2002) 35 John Marshall Law Review 311 at 321. Also see Uniform Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (US) s5(b) Comment para 4.Google Scholar
McCullagh, A, Caelli, W and Little, P, ‘Signature stripping: A digital dilemma’, (2001) 1 Journal of Information, Law and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Sharon and Low, Rouhshi, ‘Moving the Statute of Frauds to the digital age’, (2003) 77 Australian Law Journal416Google Scholar
Davidson, Alan, ‘Electronic transactions and contracts’, (2001) 21 Proctor6, 38Google Scholar
Davidson, Alan, ‘The Electronic Transaction Acts – in action or inaction?’, (2007) 27 Proctor7, 47Google Scholar
Davidson, Alan, ‘A matter of consent’, (2004) 24 Proctor11, 25Google Scholar
Nicoll, CC, ‘Consent – Luddite's lifeline’, (2000) 9(3) Information & Communications Technology Law195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Patrick and Forder, Jay, Electronic Commerce and the Law, 2nd edn, Wiley Press, Brisbane, 2003, p. 67Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×