Bibliography

Gary W. Cox; Mathew D. McCubbins

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511810060.023

Abram, Michael, and Cooper, Joseph. 1968. “The Rise of Seniority in the House of Representatives.” Polity 1(1):52–85.CrossRef Google Scholar

Achen, Christopher H. 1982. Interpreting and Using Regression. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.CrossRef Google Scholar

Adler, E. Scott. 2000. “Constituency Characteristics and the ‘Guardian’ Model of Appropriations Subcommittees, 1959–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 44:104–14.CrossRef Google Scholar

Adler, E. Scott, and Lapinski, John. 1997. “Demand-Side Theory and Congressional Committee Composition: A Constituency Characteristics Approach.” American Journal of Political Science 41:895–918.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alchian, Arman A. 1950. “Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 59:211–21.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alchian, Arman A., and Demsetz, Harold. 1972. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62(5):777–95.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H. 1988. “Modeling the Party-in-the-Legislature.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 1995. “Conditional Party Government Revisited: The House GOP and the Committee System in the 104th Congress.” Extensions of Remarks (in the APSA Legislative Studies Section Newsletter) 19, 5–7.

Aldrich, John H., and David, W. Rohde. 1997–8. “The Transition to Republican Rule in the House: Implications for theories of Congressional Politics.” Political Science Quarterly 112(Winter): 541–67.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H., and David, W. Rohde 2000. “The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee.” The Journal of Politics 62(1):1–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government.” In Congress Reconsidered, 7th edition, eds. Lawrence, C. Dodd and Bruce, I. Oppenheimer. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar

Allen, Jonathan. 2005. “Buyer's Insertion Into Panel Chair Doesn't Sit Well with Veterans.” CQ Weekly. 10 January, 72.Google Scholar

American Political Science Association (APSA). 1950. Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System. New York: Rinehart.

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James, and Stewart, Charles. 2001. “The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26:533–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. 1979. Congress and the Bureaucracy: A Theory of Influence. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Aumann, Robert J. 1981. “Survey of Repeated Games.” In Essays in Game Theory and Mathematical Economics in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern, eds. Robert, J. Aumann et al., pp. 11–42. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert. 1981. “The Emergence of Cooperation Among Egoists.” American Political Science Review 75:306–18.CrossRef Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bach, Stanley, and Steven, S. Smith. 1988. Managing Uncertainty in the House of Representatives: Adaptation and Innovation in Special Rules. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Banks, Jeffrey S., and Sobel, Joel 1987. “Equilibrium Selection in Signaling Games.” Econometrica 55(3):647–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barry, John M. 1989. The Ambition and the Power. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 1985. “Alternative Misspecifications in Simultaneous Equation Models.” Political Methodology 11:181–99.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44:35–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bates, Robert H. 1987. “Contra Contractarianism: Some Reflections on the New Institutionalism.” (October) Working Paper No. 1, John M. Olin Program in Normative Political Economy.

Baumol, W. 1962. “On the Theory of Expansion of the Firm.” American Economic Review 52(5):1078–87.Google Scholar

Baylis, Thomas A. 1989. Governing by Committee: Collegial Leadership in Advanced Societies. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Beth, Richard S. 2001. “The Discharge Rule in the House: Principal Features and Uses.” Congressional Research Service Report, 97–552.Google Scholar

Blalock, Hubert M. Jr. 1979. Social Statistics, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Bloom, Howard S., and Price, H. Douglas. 1975. “Voter Response to Short-run Economic Conditions: The Asymmetric Effects of Prosperity and Recession.” American Political Science Review 69:1240–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bolling, Richard. 1965. Defeating the Leadership Nominee in the House Democratic Caucus. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Bolling, Richard 1974. “Committees in the House.” American Academy of Political Science, Annals 411(January):1–14.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bond, Jon, and Richard Fleisher. 2000. “Congress and the President in a Partisan Era.” In Polarized Politics: The President and the Congress in a Partisan Era, eds. Bond, Jon and Fleischer, Richard, pp. 31–72. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Brady, David W. 1973. Congressional Voting in a Partisan Era: A Study of the McKinley Houses and a Comparison to the Modern House of Representatives. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Brady, David W., and Charles, S. Bullock III. 1983. “Party and Factional Organization in Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 8(4):599–654.Google Scholar

Brady, David W., and Mathew, D. McCubbins, eds. 2002. Party, Process and Policy: Studies of the History of Congress. Palo Alto, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Brady, David W., and Mathew, D. McCubbins 2006. Process, Party and Policy Making: Advances on the History of Congress. Palo Alto, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Brady, David W., and Volden, Craig. 1998. Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Carter to Clinton. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Brady, David W., Cooper, Joseph, and Patricia, A. Hurley. 1979. “The Decline of Party in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1887–1968.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4:381–407.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brewer, Mark D., Mack, D. Mariani, and Jeffrey, M. Stonecash. 2002. “Northern Democrats and Party Polarization in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27:423–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, Sherrod. 2004. Congress from the Inside, 3rd edition. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar

Browning, Robert. 1985. “Presidents, Congress, and Policy Outcomes – United-States Social-Welfare Expenditures, 1949–77.” American Journal of Political Science 29:197–216.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bullock, Charles S. III. 1970. “Apprenticeship and Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 23:717–20.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bullock, Charles S. III 1971. “The Influence of State Party Delegations on House Committee Assignments.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 15(August): 525–46.Google Scholar

Bullock, Charles S. III 1973. “Committee Transfers in the United States House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 35(February):85–120.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bullock, Charles S. III 1976. “Motivations for U.S. Congressional Committee Preferences: Freshmen of the 92nd Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 1(May):201–12.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bullock, Charles S. III 1985. “U.S. Senate Committee Assignments: Preferences, Motivations, and Success.” American Journal of Political Science 29(4): 789–808.Google Scholar

Bullock, Charles S. III, and Sprague, John. 1969. “Research Note on the Committee Reassignments of Southern Democratic Congressmen.” Journal of Politics 31(May):493–512.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bullock, Kari, and John Baden. 1977. “Communes and the Logic of the Commons.” In Managing the Commons, eds. Hardin, Garrett and Baden, John, pp. 182–9. San Francisco, California: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. 1975. “On the Present Discontent” (1770). In Edmund Burke on Government, Politics, and Society, ed. Hill, B. W., pp. 74–119. Hassocks: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Calvert, Randall L. 1985. “The Value of Biased Information: A Rational Choice Model of Political Advice.” Journal of Politics 47(2):530–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Calvert, Randall L. 1986. “Reputation and Political Leadership: A Game-Theoretic Approach.” Photocopy.

Calvert, Randall L. 1988. “Coordination and Power: The Foundations of Leadership among Rational Legislators.” Paper presented at the Hoover Institution Conference on Legislative Institutions, Practices and Behavior, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.

Calvert, Randall L., and Ferejohn, John. 1983. “Coattail Voting in Recent Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review 77:407–19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Campbell, Andrea. 2001. “Party Government in the U.S. Senate.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, San Diego.

Campbell, Andrea, Gary W. Cox, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2002. “Agenda Power in the US Senate. 1877–1986.” In Party, Process and Political Change in Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D., pp. 146–65. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Philip, E. Converse, Warren, E. Miller, and Donald, E. Stokes. 1960 [1976]. The American Voter. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Cassata, Donna. 1995. “Republicans Bask in Success of Rousing Performance.” CQ Weekly. 8 April, 986.Google Scholar

Castle, David, and Patrick Fett. 2000. “Member Goals and Party Switching in the U.S. Congress.” In Congress on Display, Congress at Work, ed. William, T. Bianco, pp. 231–41. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Cater, Douglass. 1964. Power in Washington. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Cheung, Frederick Hok-Ming. 1983. “From Military Aristocracy to Imperial Bureaucracy: Patterns of Consolidation in Two Medieval Empires.” Dissertation. University of California, Santa Barbara, California.

Claggett, William, Flanigan, William, and Zingale, Nancy. 1984. “Nationalization of the American Electorate.” American Political Science Review 78:77–91.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clapp, Charles L. 1963. The Congressman: His Work as He Sees It. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Clapp, Charles L. 1964. The Congressman: His Work as He Sees It. Garden City, New Jersey: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Clark, Joseph. 1964. Congress – The Sapless Branch. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Cloud, David. 1995. CQ Weekly. 7 January, 13.Google Scholar

Clubb, Jerome M., and Traugott, Sandra. 1977. “Partisan Cleavage and Cohesion in the House of Representatives, 1861–1974.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7:375–402.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cochrane, Willard Wesley. 1958. Farm Prices, Myth and Reality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, Linda, and Noll, Roger. 1991. The Technology Pork Barrel. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Cohen, Richard E. 1995. Washington at Work: Back Rooms and Clean Air, 2nd edition. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Collie, Melissa P. 1984. “Legislative Voting Behavior.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9:3–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Collie, Melissa P. 1988a. “The Rise of Coalition Politics: Voting in the U.S. House, 1933–1980.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13:321–42.CrossRef Google Scholar

Collie, Melissa P. 1988b. “Universalism and the Parties in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1921–80.” American Journal of Political Science 32:865–83.CrossRef Google Scholar

Collie, Melissa P., and David W. Brady. 1985. “The Decline of Partisan Voting Coalitions in the House of Representatives.” In Congress Reconsidered, 3rd edition, eds. Lawrence, D. Dodd and Bruce, I Oppenheimer, pp. 272–87. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Collie, Melissa P., and Joseph Cooper. 1989. “Multiple Referral and the ‘New’ Committee System in the House of Representatives.” In Congress Reconsidered, 4th edition, eds. Lawrence, C. Dodd and Bruce, I. Oppenheimer, pp. 245–72. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Cook, Timothy E. 1983. “The Policy Impact of the Committee Assignment Process in the House.” Journal of Politics 45:1027–36.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cooper, Joseph. 1970. The Origins of the Standing Committees and the Development of the Modern House. Houston, Texas: William Marsh Rice University.Google Scholar

Cooper, Joseph, and David, W. Brady. 1981. “Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn.” American Political Science Review 75:411–25.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cooper, Joseph, David W. Brady, and Patricia A. Hurley. 1977. “The Electoral Basis of Party Voting: Patterns and Trends in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In The Impact of the Electoral Process, eds. Maisel, Louis and Cooper, Joseph, pp. 133–65. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.Google Scholar

Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1947, 68.

Congressional Quarterly Almanac 1950, 375–379, 593.

Congressional Quarterly Almanac 1963, 380.

Congressional Quarterly Almanac 1974, 634–41.

Congressional Quarterly Almanac 1975, 27–28.

Congressional Quarterly Almanac 1975, 31.

Cox, Gary W. 1987. “The Uncovered Set and the Core.” American Journal of Political Science 31(2):408–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1989. “Undominated Candidate Strategies under Alternative Voting Rules.” Mathematical Computer Modelling 12(4/5):451–9.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. “Fiscal Policy and Divided Government.” In The Politics of Divided Government, eds. Gary, W. Cox and Kernell, Samuel, pp. 155–72. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2001. “The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes.” In Presidents, Parliaments and Policy, eds. Mathew, D. McCubbins and Haggard, Stephan, pp. 21–63. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2002. “Agenda Power in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1877 to 1986.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and Mathew, D. McCubbins, pp. 150–219. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2004. Theories of Legislative Organization. American Political Science Association – Comparative Politics Newsletter, Winter.

Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Cox, Gary W., and Keith, T. Poole. 2002. “On Measuring Partisanship in Roll-Call Voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877–1999.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 477–489.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W., Christopher F. Den Hartog, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2004. “The Motion to Recommit in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Unpublished typescript. University of California, San Diego.

Cox, Gary W., Mathew, D. McCubbins, and Schwartz, Thomas. N.d. “The Theory of Legislative Parties.” In preparation.CrossRef Google Scholar

CQ Weekly. 2 January 1959, 24.

CQ Weekly 8 February 1963, 151.

CQ Weekly 22 January 1965, 109.

CQ Weekly 7 April 1967, 507.

CQ Weekly 22 March 1968, 587.

CQ Weekly 21 February 1969, 274.

CQ Weekly 7 May 1971, 1019.

CQ Weekly 24 March 1973, 676.

CQ Weekly 19 November 1994, 3326.

CQ Weekly 7 January 1995, 14.

Crombez, Christophe, Tim Groseclose, and Keith Krehbiel. 2005. “Gatekeeping” (February) Stanford GSB Working Paper No. 1861.

Crotty, William J. 1984. American Parties in Decline, 2nd edition. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H. 1974. “Representation and Congressional Committees.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 441:48–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H. 1977. “Breaking up Those ‘Cozy Triangles’: An Impossible Dream?” In Legislative Reform and Public Policy, eds. Susan Welch and John, G. Peters, pp. 30–53. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H. 1981a. “Congressional Leaders as Agents of Change.” In Understanding Congressional Leadership, ed. Frank, H. Mackaman, pp. 135–56. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H. 1981b. “Subcommittee Government: New Channels for Policy Making.” In The New Congress, eds. Thomas, E. Mann and Norman, J. Ornstein, pp. 99–133. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H., and Walter, J. Oleszek. 1977. Congress against Itself. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H., and Walter, J. Oleszek 1990. Congress and Its Members, 3rd edition. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H., and Walter, J. Oleszek 2000. Congress and Its Members, 8th edition. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H., Walter, J. Oleszek, and Kephart, Thomas. 1988. “One Bill, Many Committees: Multiple Referrals in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13:3–28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Deering, Christopher J., and Steven, S. Smith. 1997. Committees in Congress, 3rd edition. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Den Hartog, Christopher F. 2004. “Limited Party Government and the Majority Party Revolution in the Nineteenth-Century House.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, San Diego, California.

Dodd, Lawrence C., and Bruce I. Oppenheimer. 1977. “The House in Transition.” In Congress Reconsidered, 6th edition, eds. Lawrence, C. Dodd and Bruce, I. Oppenheimer, pp. 21–53. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Dodd, Lawrence C., and Bruce I. Oppenheimer 1989. “Consolidating Power in the House: The Rise of a New Oligarchy.” In Congress Reconsidered, 4th edition, eds. Lawrence, C. Dodd and Bruce, I. Oppenheimer, pp. 39–64. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Dodd, Lawrence C., and Bruce I. Oppenheimer 1997. “Congress and the Emerging Order: Conditional Party Government of Constructive Partisanship?” In Congress Reconsidered, 6th edition, eds. Lawrence, C. Dodd and Bruce, I. Oppenheimer, pp. 390–410. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Doherty, Carroll J. and Jeffrey, L. Katz. 1998. CQ Weekly. 4 July, 1818–19.

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Dubose, Lou, and Reid, Jan. 2004. The Hammer: Tom Delay, God, Money, and the Rise of the Republican Congress. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Edwards, George Charles, III. 2002. “Strategic Choices and the Early Bush Legislative Agenda” PS: Political Science 35(1):41–5.Google Scholar

Eidenberg, Eugene, and Roy, D. Morey. 1969. An Act of Congress: The Legislative Process and the Making of Education Policy. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Enelow, James M., and Melvin, J. Hinich. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Lawrence, and Walter, J. Oleszek. 1997. Congress Under Fire: Reform Politics and the Republican Majority. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Fama, Eugene. 1980. “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy 88:288–307.CrossRef Google Scholar

Farrell, Joseph. 1987. “Cheap Talk, Coordination, and Entry.” Rand Journal of Economics 18(1):34–9.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1962. “The House Appropriations Committee as a Political System: The Problem of Integration.” American Political Science Review (June): 310–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1966. The Power of the Purse. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 1974a. Pork Barrel Politics: Rivers and Harbors Legislation, 1947–1968. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John 1974b. “Sour Notes on the Theory of Vote Trading.” Social Science Working Paper No. 41, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.

Ferejohn, John 1986. “Logrolling in an Institutional Context: A Case Study of Food Stamp Legislation.” In Congress and Policy Change, eds. Gerald, C. Wright, Leroy, N. Rieselback, and Lawrence, C. Dodd, pp. 223–53. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1977. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1980. “The Decline of Collective Responsibility in American-Politics.” Daedalus 109:25–45.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. “Universalism, Reciprocity and Distributive Policy-Making in Majority Rule Institutions.” In Research in Public Policy-Making and Management, Volume 1, ed. Criecine, J. P., pp. 197–221. Greenwich, Connecticut: Jai Press, 197–220.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P., and Noll, Roger. 1979. “Majority Rule Models and Legislative Elections.” Journal of Politics 41:1081–1104.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fishburn, Peter C. 1973. The Theory of Social Choice. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Foerstel, Karen. 2001. “Early Grief for GOP Leaders in New Committee Rules.” CQ Weekly. 6 January, 12.Google Scholar

Foerstel, Karen 2000. “Choosing Chairmen: Tradition's Role Fades.” CQ Weekly. 9 December, 2796.Google Scholar

Fowler, Linda L. 1982. “How Interest-Groups Select Issues for Rating Voting Records of Members of the United-States Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7:401–13.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fox, Harrison W. Jr., and Hammond, Susan Webb. 1977. Congressional Staffs: The Invisible Force in American Lawmaking. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, John Leiper. 1955. The Political Process: Executive Bureau-Legislative Committee Relations. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Friedman, James W. 1997. Game Theory with Applications to Economics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Frisch, Scott A., and Sean, Q Kelly. 2006. Committee Assignment Politics in the U.S. House. Norman: The University of Oklahoma Press, Congressional Studies Series.Google Scholar

Frohlich, Norman, and Joe, A. Oppenheimer. 1978. Modern Political Economy. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Frohlich, Norman, Joe, A. Oppenheimer, and Oran, R. Young. 1971. Political Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Froman, Lewis A. Jr. 1967. The Congressional Process: Strategies, Rules, and Procedures. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Froman, Lewis A. Jr., and Randall, B. Ripley. 1965. “Conditions for Party Leadership: The Case of the House Democrats.” American Political Science Review 59: 52–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gauthier, David P. 1969. The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara. 1991. “A Game Theoretic Model of Reform in Latin American Democracies.” American Political Science Review 85(2):371–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gertzog, Irwin N. 1976. “The Routinization of Committee Assignments in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 20(4): 693–712.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1987. “Collective Decision-Making and Standing Committees: An Informal Rationale for Restrictive Amendment Procedures.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3:287–335.Google Scholar

Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith 1989a. “Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a Heterogeneous Committee.” American Journal of Political Science 33(2):459–90.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gilligan, Thomas W., and Keith Krehbiel 1989b. “Collective Choice without Procedural Commitment.” In Models of Strategic Choice in Politics, ed. Peter, C. Ordeshook, pp. 295–314. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1990. “Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature.” American Journal of Political Science 34:531–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gimpel, James G. 1996. Legislating the Revolution: The Contract with America in Its First 100 Days. Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Gittins, John C. 1979. “Bandit Processes and Dynamic Allocation Indices.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B Series 41:148–64.Google Scholar

Gittins, John C., and D. M. Jones. 1974. “A Dynamic Allocation Index for the Sequential Design of Experiments.” In Progress in Statistics, ed. Gani, J., pp. 241–66. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Goodwin, George. 1959. “The Seniority System in Congress.” American Political Science Review 53:412–36.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodwin, George. 1970. The Little Legislatures. Amherst, Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Goss, Carol F. 1972. “Military Committee Membership and Defense-Related Benefits in the House of Representatives.” Western Political Quarterly 25(2):215–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Green, Harold, and Rosenthal, Alan. 1963. Government of the Atom: The Integration of Powers. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar

Grier, Kevin B. N.d. “Congressional Preference and Federal Reserve Policy.” Center for the Study of American Business, Washington University. Photocopy.

Griffith, Ernest S. 1961. Congress, Its Contemporary Role, 3rd edition. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Grose, Christian, and Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2003. “The Consequences of Party Switching in Congress: The Electoral Fortunes of Incumbent Legislators Who Switched Parties, 1947–2000.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(1):55–75.CrossRef Google Scholar

Groseclose, Tim. 1994. “The Committee Outlier Debate – A Review and a Reexamination of Some of the Evidence.” Public Choice 80:265–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Groseclose, Tim, and David C. King. 2000. “Committee Theories and Committee Institutions.” Working Paper. http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/prg/king/committ.htm

Groseclose, Tim, and David C. King 2001. “Committee Theories Reconsidered.” In Congress Reconsidered, 7th edition, eds. Lawrence, C. Dodd and Bruce, I. Oppenheimer, pp. 191–217. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Richard L. 1989. “Committee Decision Making in the Postreform Congress.” In Congress Reconsidered, 4th edition, eds. Lawrence, D. Dodd and Bruce, I. Oppenheimer, pp. 197–223. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Richard L. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Richard L., and Grofman, Bernard. 1990. “The Committee Assignment Process and the Conditional Nature of Committee Bias.” American Political Science Review 84(4):1149–66.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hamburger, Henry. 1979. Games as Models of Social Phenomena. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. 1982. Collective Action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell 1991. “Hobbesian Political Order.” Political Theory 19(2):156–80.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hastert, Dennis. 2004. Speaker: Lessons from Forty Years in Coaching and Politics. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing.

Hayek, Friedrich A.. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Heberlig, Eric S. 2003. “Congressional Parties, Fundraising and Committee Ambition.” Political Research Quarterly 56(2):151–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hinckley, Barbara. 1971. The Seniority System in Congress. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Hinckley, Barbara 1973. Stability and Change in Congress, 3rd edition. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Hinckley, Barbara 1975. “Policy Content, Committee Membership, and Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 19(3):543–57.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hinckley, Barbara 1976. “Seniority 1975: Old Theories Confront New Facts.” British Journal of Political Science 6:283–99.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hinckley, Barbara 1983. Stability and Change in Congress. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. 1977. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hogg, Robert V., and Allen, T. Craig. 1978. Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, 4th edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Holmstrom, Bengt. 1982. “Moral Hazard in Teams.” Bell Journal of Economics 13:324–40.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hook, Janet. 1994. “New Congress Poised to Turn Tradition on its Head.” CQ Weekly. 31 December, 3591.Google Scholar

Hook, Janet 1995. “Republicans Vote in Lock Step, But Unity may not Last Long.” CQ Weekly. 18 February, 495.Google Scholar

Hook, Janet, and David, S. Cloud. 1994. CQ Weekly. 3 December, 3430.

Jackson, John Edgar. 1974. Constituencies and Leaders in Congress: Their Effects on Senate Voting Behavior. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86.” American Political Science Review 83(3):773–93.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C.1990. “Divided Government, Strategic Politicians, and the 1990 Congressional Elections.” Paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 18–29.

Jacobson, Gary C. 1996a. “The 1994 House Elections in Perspective.” Political Science Quarterly 111 (Summer):203–23; also in Midterm: The Elections of 1994 in Context, ed. Philip, A. Klinkner, pp. 1–20. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1996b. “Divided Government and the 1994 House Elections.” In Divided Government: Change, Uncertainty, and the Constitutional Order, ed. Peter, F. Galderisi, pp. 61–83. Boulder, Colorado: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2000. “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection.” In Polarized Politics: The President and the Congress in a Partisan Era, eds. Bond, Jon and Fleischer, Richard, pp. 9–30. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections, 2nd edition. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel 1990. “National Forces in the 1986 House Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15:65–87.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel 1996a. “The 1994 House Elections in Perspective.” Political Science Quarterly 111 (Summer):203–23; also in Midterm: The Elections of 1994 in Context, ed. Philip, A. Klinkner, pp. 1–20. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell 1996b. “Divided Government and the 1994 House Elections.” In Divided Government: Change, Uncertainty, and the Constitutional Order, ed. Peter, F. Galderisi, pp. 61–83. Boulder, Colorado: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Peter. 1988. Mrs. Thatcher's Revolution: The Ending of the Socialist Era. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jensen, Michael C., and William, H. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3:305–60.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jewell, Malcolm, and Chi-Hung Chiu, . 1974. “Membership Movement and Committee Attractiveness in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1963–1971.” American Journal of Political Science 18(May):433–41.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jewell, Malcolm, and Samuel, C. Patterson. 1977. The Legislative Process in the United States, 3rd edition. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Jones, Charles O. 1961. “Representation in Congress: The Case of the House Agriculture Committee.” American Political Science Review 55(June): 358–67.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones, Charles O. 1962. “The Role of the Congressional Subcommittee.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 6:327–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones, Charles O. 1964. Party and Policy-making: The House Republican Policy Committee. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Charles O. 1968. “Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 30:617–46. Also in Congress: Structure and Policy, eds. Mathew, D. McCubbins and Sullivan, Terry. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Charles O. 1969. “The Agriculture Committee and the Problem of Representation.” In New Perspectives on the House of Representatives, eds. Robert, L. Peabody and Nelson, W. Polsby, pp. 109–28. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Jones, Charles O. 1977. An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy, 2nd edition. North Scituate, Massachusetts: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar

Kalai, Ehud, and Dov Samet. 1982. “Persistent Equilibria in Strategic Games.” Unpublished paper, Northwestern University.

Kammerer, Gladys. 1951. “The Record of Congress in Committee Staffing.” American Political Science Review 45:1126–36.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kampelman, Max. 1954. “The Legislative Bureaucracy: Its Response to Political Change.” Journal of Politics 16:539–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Katz, Jonathan N., and Brian, R. Sala. 1996. “Careerism, Committee Assignments, and the Electoral Connection,” American Political Science Review 90(1): 21–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kavka, Gregory S. 1987. Moral Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kawato, Sadafumi. 1987. “Nationalization and Partisan Realignment in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 81(4):1235–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kernell, Samuel. 1991. “Facing an Opposition Congress: The President's Strategic Circumstance.” In The Politics of Divided Government, eds. Cox, Gary W. and Kernell, Samuel, pp. 87–112. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. “Political-Attitudes in America.” Science 220:1144–5.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew, D. McCubbins. 1988. “Presidential Influence on Congressional Appropriations Decisions,” American Journal of Political Science 32:713–36.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew, D. McCubbins 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Kevin A. Roust. 2006. “Legislative Endgame: A Historical Analysis of the Motion to Recommit in the House of Representatives”. In Process, Party and Policy Making: Further Advances on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Killian, Linda. 1998. The Freshmen: What Happened to the Republican Revolution. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics – The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11:129–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Koford, Kenneth J. 1987. “Testing Theories of Legislative Voting – Dimensions, Ideology and Structure.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12:164.Google Scholar

Koford, Kenneth J. 1989. “Dimensions in Congressional Voting.” American Political Science Review 83:949–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

Koszczuk, Jackie. CQ Weekly. 7 October 1995, 3049.

Kramer, Gerald. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review 65:131–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kramer, Gerald1983. “Electoral Politics in the Zero-Sum Society.” Social Science Working Paper No. 472, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.

Krehbiel, Keith. 1987a. “Sophisticated Committees and Structure-Induced Equilibria in Congress.” In Congress: Structure and Policy, eds. Mathew, D. McCubbins and Sullivan, Terry, pp. 376–402. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith 1987b. “Why Are Congressional Committees Powerful?” American Political Science Review 81:929–35.CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith 1990. “Are Congressional Committees Composed of Preference Outliers?” American Political Science Review 84(1):149–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Krehbiel, Keith 1995. “Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z,” American Journal of Political Science 39(4):906–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith 1997. “Restrictive Rules Reconsidered,” American Journal of Political Science 41(3):919–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith, and Meirowitz, Adam. 2002. “Minority Rights and Majority Power: Theoretical Consequences of the Motion to Recommit.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27:191–218.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kreps, David M. 1984. “Corporate Culture and Economic Theory.” Paper prepared for presentation to the Second Mitsubishi Bank Foundation Conference on Technology and Business Strategy.

Kreps, David M. 1985. “Disaster and the Social Order.” Sociological Theory 3:49–65.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kreps, David M., and Wilson, Robert. 1982. “Sequential Equilibria.” Econometrica 50(4):863–94.CrossRef Google Scholar

Krutz, Glen S. 2001. Hitching a Ride: Omnibus Legislating in the U.S. Congress. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

LaPalombara, Joseph, and Myron Weiner. 1966. “The Origin and Development of Political Parties.” In Political Parties and Political Development, eds. LaPalombara, Joseph and Weiner, Myron, pp. 3–42. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lazarus, Jeff, and Nathan Monroe. 2003. “The Speaker's Discretion: Conference Committee Appointments from the 97th-106th Congresses.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 28–31.

Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lipinski, Daniel. 2004. Congressional Communication. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lowi, Theodore J. 1972. “Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice.” Public Administration Review (July–August):298–310.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lowi, Theodore J. 1979. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew, D. McCubbins. 1995. “Who Controls? Information and the Structure of Legislative Decision Making.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19:361–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew, D. McCubbins 2005. “Lost in Translation: Social Choice Theory is Misapplied Against Legislative Intent.” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 14 (February):585–617.Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur, and Strøm, Kaare. 1995. “Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 89(3):648–65.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maddala, G. S. 1977. Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Maddala, G. S. 1988. Introduction to Econometrics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest. 1995. “Meeting Competing Demands – Committee Performance in the Postreform House.” American Journal of Political Science 39:653–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest. 1997. Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest, and Steven, S. Smith. 1994. “Principals, Goals, Dimensionality, and Congressional Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19:457–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

Manley, John F. 1969. “Wilbur D. Mills: A Study in Congressional Influence.” American Political Science Review 63:442–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Manley, John F. 1970. The Politics of Finance: The House Committee on Ways and Means. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Manley, John F. 1976. American Government and Public Policy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Martinez, Gebe. 1999. “Democrats Hope to Win by Staying Unified in Defeat,” Congressional Quarterly Report 57(30):1777–81.Google Scholar

Martinez, Gebe 2003. CQ Weekly. 29 November, 2962.

Marwell, Gerald. 1967. “Party, Region and the Dimensions of Conflict in the House of Representatives, 1949–1954.” American Political Science Review 61: 380–99.CrossRef Google Scholar

Masters, Nicholas A. 1961. “Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 55(June):345–57.CrossRef Google Scholar

Matthews, Donald R. 1960. U.S. Senators and Their World. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David. 1966. Party Loyalty Among Congressmen. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayhew, David 1968. “Congressional Conservatism and New-Deal – Growth of Conservative Coalition in Congress, 1933–1939.” American Political Science Review 62:1298–300.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayhew, David 1974. The Electoral Connection. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McConachie, Lauros G. 1898. Congressional Committees. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar

McConnell, Grant. 1966. Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew D. 1985. “The Legislative Design of Regulatory Structure.” American Journal of Political Science 29:721–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew D., and Schwartz, Thomas. 1988. “Congress, the Courts, and Public Policy: Consequences of the One Man, One Vote Rule.” American Journal of Political Science 32(2):388–415.CrossRef Google Scholar

McKelvey, Richard D. 1976. “Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control.” Journal of Economic Theory 12:472–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

McKelvey, Richard D. 1979. “General Conditions for Global Intransitivities in Formal Voting Models.” Econometrica 47:1085–1112.CrossRef Google Scholar

McKelvey, Richard D. 1986. “Covering, Dominance, and Institution-Free Properties of Social Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 30(2):283–314.CrossRef Google Scholar

McKelvey, Richard D., and Wendell, R. E.. 1976. “Voting Equilibria in Multidimensional Choice Spaces.” Mathematics of Operations Research 1:144–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, Clem. 1962. Member of the House: Letters of a Congressman, ed. John, W. Baker. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Miller, Gary J. 1987. “Administrative Dilemmas: The Role of Political Leadership” Political Economy Working Paper, School of Business and Center in Political Economy, Washington University, St. Louis.

Miller, Nicholas R. 1980. “A New Solution Set for Tournaments and Majority Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 24:769–803.CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, Warren E., and Donald, E. Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57:45–56.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mirrlees, James. 1976. “The Optimal Structure of Incentives and Authority within and Organization.” The Bell Journal of Economics 7:105–31.CrossRef Google Scholar

Munger, Frank J., and Richard, F. Fenno Jr. 1962. National Politics and Federal Aid to Education. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

Munger, Michael C. 1988. “Allocation of Desirable Committee Assignments: Extended Queues versus Committee Expansion.” American Journal of Political Science 32(2):317–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Murphy, James T. 1974. “Political Parties and the Porkbarrel: Party Conflict and Cooperation in House Public Works Committee Decision-Making.” American Political Science Review 68:169–86.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ogul, Morris . 1976. Congress Oversees the Bureaucracy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J. 1984. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J. 2001. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 5th edition. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 1977. “The Rules Committee: New Arm of Leadership in a Decentralized House.” In Congress Reconsidered, 1st edition, eds. Lawrence, C. Dodd and Bruce, I Oppenheimer, pp. 96–116. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Ordeshook, Peter C. 1986. Game Theory and Political Theory: An Introduction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ornstein, Norman J., and David W. Rohde. 1977a. “Revolt from Within: Congressional Change, Legislative Policy and the House Commerce Committee.” In Legislative Reform and Public Policy, eds. John, G. Peters and Welch, Susan, pp. 54–72. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Ornstein, Norman J., and David W. Rohde 1977b. “Shifting Forces, Changing Rules, and Political Outcomes: The Impact of Congressional Change on Four House Committees.” In New Perspectives on the House of Representatives, 3rd edition, eds. Peabody, Robert and Polsby, Nelson, pp. 186–69. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Osterlund, Peter. 1991. “A Capitol Chameleon: What Will Newt Gingrich Do Next,” Los Angeles Times Magazine, August 25. 37.Google Scholar

Ostrogorski, Moisei. 1902 [1964]. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties, edited and abridged by Seymour Martin Lipset. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Ota, Alan K. 1999. CQ Weekly 1 January, 79.

Owens, John E. 1997. “The Return of Party Government in the US House of Representatives: Central Leadership-committee relations in the 104th Congress.” British Journal of Political Science 27:247–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

Palazzolo, Dan. 1989. “The Speaker's Relationship with the House Budget Committee: Assessing the Effect of Contextual Change and Individual Leader Discretion on a ‘Leadership Committee.’” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.

Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power, trans. Marc Silver. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Parker, Glenn, and Suzanne, L. Parker. 1985. Factions in House Committees. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar

Peabody, Robert. 1976. Leadership in Congress: Stability, Succession, and Change. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Perkins, Lynette P. 1980. “Influences of Members' Goals on Their Committee Behavior: The U.S. House Judiciary Committee.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 5(3):373–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

Peterson, Geoffrey D., and J. Mark Wrighton. 1994. “Ideological Bias in House Committees and Subcommittees” Southern Political Science Association Annual Meeting, November, Atlanta.

Peterson, Geoffrey D., and J. Mark Wrighton 1996. “The Continuing Puzzle of Committee Preferences: A Methodological Reassessment” Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, April.

Peterson, Geoffrey D., and Mark, J. Wrighton 1998. “The Continuing Puzzle of Committee Outliers: A Methodological Reassessment.” Congress & the Presidency 25(1):67–79.CrossRef Google Scholar

Plott, Charles R. 1967. “A Notion of Equilibrium and Its Possibility under Majority Rule.” American Economic Review 57:787–806.Google Scholar

Polsby, Nelson W, Gallaher, Miriam, and Rundquist, Barry. 1969. “The Growth of the Seniority System in the House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62:148–68.Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRef Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 29:357–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard 1987. “Analysis of Congressional Coalition Patterns: A Unidimensional Spatial Model.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12:55–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ray, Bruce A. 1980a. “Federal Spending and the Selection of Committee Assignments in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science (August):494–510.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ray, Bruce A. 1980b. “The Responsiveness of the U.S. Congressional Armed Service Committees to Their Parent Bodies.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 5(4): 501–15.CrossRef Google Scholar

Renka, Russel D., and Daniel E. Ponder. 2003. “Committee Seniority Violations in the U.S. House and Senate” Working Paper: Department of Political Science, Southeast Missouri State University.

Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Riker, William H. 1980. “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 74:432–46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ripley, Randall. 1967. Party Leaders in the House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Ripley, Randall 1969a. “Legislative Bargaining and the Food Stamp Act, 1964.” In Congress and Urban Problems, ed. Cleveland, Frederic, pp. 279–310. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Ripley, Randall 1969b. Majority Party Leadership in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Ripley, Randall 1983. Congress: Process and Policy, 3rd edition. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Ripley, Randall, and Grace, A. Franklin. 1984. Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy, 3rd edition. Homewood, Illinois: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar

Ritchie, Robert C. 1986. Pirates: Myths and Realities. Minneapolis: James Ford Bell Library, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar

Roberts, Jason M. (Forthcoming). “Minority Rights and Majority Power: Conditional Party Government and the Motion to Recommit in the House, 1909–2000.” Legislative Studies Quarterly.Google Scholar

Roberts, Jason M., and Steven, S. Smith. 2003. “Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000.” American Journal of Political Science 47(2):305–17.CrossRef Google Scholar

Roberts, Kevin, and Martin, L. Weitzman. 1981. “Funding Criteria for Research, Development, and Exploration Projects.” Econometrica 49:1261–88.CrossRef Google Scholar

Robinson, James. 1963. The House Rules Committee. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1974. “Committee Reform in the House of Representatives and the ‘Subcommittee Bill of Rights.’” Annals 411:39–47.Google Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1988. “Variations in Partisanship in the House of Representatives, 1953–1988: Southern Democrats, Realignment, and Agenda Change.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September 1–3.

Rohde, David W. 1989a. “Democratic Party Leadership, Agenda Control, and the Resurgence of Partisanship in the House.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.

Rohde, David W. 1989b. “‘Something's Happening Here; What It Is Ain't Exactly Clear’: Southern Democrats in the House of Representatives.” In Home Style and Washington Work: Studies in Congressional Politics, eds. Morris, P. Fiorina and David, W. Rohde, pp. 137–63. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1990. “‘The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated’: Parties and Party Voting in the House of Representatives.” In Changing Perspectives on Congress, ed. Glenn, R. Parker. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1992. “Electoral Forces, Political Agendas, and Partisanship in the House and Senate.” In The Postreform Congress, ed. Davidson, Roger, pp. 27–47. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1994. “Parties and Committees in the House: Member Motivations, Issues, and Institutional Arrangements.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19:341–60.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rohde, David W., and Kenneth, A. Shepsle. 1973. “Democratic Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives: Strategic Aspects of a Social Choice Process.” American Political Science Review 67(3):889–905.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, David E. 1994. “Congressional Memo; Strong Speaker, Strong House? One Doesn't Necessarily Follow the Other.” New York Times. December 4.Google Scholar

Sala, Brian R. 1994. “Partisan Politics in the New Deal Era: Essays on Income Taxation.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of California – San Diego.

Sala, Brian R. 2002. “Party Loyalty and Committee Leadership in the House, 1921–40.” In New Directions in Studying the History of the U.S. Congress, eds. David, W. Brady and Mathew, D McCubbins, pp. 166–192. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Salant, Johan D. “Committees: New Chairmen Swing to Right: Freshmen Get Choice Posts.” CQ Weekly 10 December 1994, 3493.

Salisbury, Robert H. 1969. “An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 13:1–32.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. 1935. Politics, Pressures, and the Tariff: A Study of Free Private Enterprise in Pressure Politics, as Shown in the 1929–1930 Revision of the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Schattschneider, Elmer Eric 1942. Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.Google Scholar

Schattschneider, Elmer Eric 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, Illinois: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. NortonGoogle Scholar

Schick, Allen. 1980. Congress and Money: Budgeting, Spending, and Taxing. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Joseph. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Joseph 1985. “The New American Political Party.” American Political Science Review 79(4).CrossRef Google Scholar

Schofield, Norman. 1980. “Generic Properties of Simple Bergson–Samuelson Welfare Functions.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 7:175–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schwartz, Thomas. 1986. The Logic of Collective Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Selten, Reinhard. 1975. “Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games.” International Journal of Game Theory 4:25–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shannon, Wayne. 1968. Party, Constituency and Congressional Voting. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth. 1978. The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth. 1979. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models.” American Journal of Political Science 23(1):27–59. Also in Congress: Structure and Policy, eds. Mathew, D. McCubbins and Sullivan, Terry. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth 1983. “The Failure of Congressional Budgeting.” Society 20:4–10.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth 1986. “Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions.” In Political Science: The Science of Politics, ed. Weisberg, Herbert, pp. 51–81. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth 1989. “Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 1(2):131–49.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth 1990. “The Changing Textbook Congress: Equilibrium Congressional Institutions and Behavior.” In American Political Institutions and the Problems of Our Time, eds. John, E. Chubb and Paul, E. Peterson, pp. 238–66. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth, and Weingast, Barry. 1981. “Structure-Induced Equilibrium and Legislative Choice.” Public Choice 37:509–19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth, and Barry Weingast 1984. “Legislative Politics and Budget Outcomes.” In Federal Budget Policy in the 1980s, eds. Gregory, B. Mills and John, L. Palmer, pp. 343–67. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth, and Weingast, Barry 1987a. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81(1):85–104.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth, and Weingast, Barry 1987b. “Reflections on Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81:935–45.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1983. Majority Leadership in the U.S. House. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara 1988. “The Distribution of Committee Positions in the United States Senate – Explaining Institutional Change.” American Journal of Political Science 32:276–301.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara 1989. Transformation of the U.S. Senate. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara 1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking: The US House of Representatives in the Postreform Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara 1997. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara 1999. “Transformational Leader or Faithful Agent? Principal–Agent Theory and House Majority Party Leadership.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24(3): 421–49.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara 2000a. “Hostile Partners: The President, Congress and Lawmaking in the Partisan 1990s.” In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, eds. Bond, Jon and Fleischer, Richard, pp. 134–53. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara 2000b. Unorthodox Lawmaking, 2nd edition. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara 2000c. “The Dream Fulfilled? Congressional Parties 50 Years After the APSA Report.” Working Paper.

Smith, Steven S. 1988. “An Essay on Sequence, Position, Goals, and Committee Power.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 8:151–77.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S., and Bruce, A. Ray. 1983. “The Impact of Congressional Reform: House Democratic Committee Assignments.” Congress and the Presidency 10(2):219–40.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S., and Christopher, J. Deering. 1983. “Changing Motives for Committee Preferences of New Members of the United-States House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 8:271–81.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S., and Christopher, J. Deering 1984. Committees in Congress. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S., and Christopher, J. Deering 1990. Committees in Congress, 2nd edition. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S., and Gerald Gamm. 2001. “The Dynamics of Party Government in Congress.” In Congress Reconsidered,7th edition, eds. Lawrence, C. Dodd and Bruce, I. Oppenheimer, pp. 245–68. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Stokes, Donald E. 1965. “A Variance Components Model of Political Effects.” In Mathematical Applications in Political Science, ed. John, M. Claunch, pp. 61–85. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.Google Scholar

Stokes, Donald E. 1967. “Parties and the Nationalization of Electoral Forces.” In The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development, eds. William, N. Chambers and Walter, D. Burnham, pp. 182–202. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Michael. 1976. Anarchy and Cooperation. London: Wiley.Google Scholar

Taylor, Michael 1987. The Possibility of Cooperation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Margaret Susan., and Silbey, Joel. 1984. “Research on 19th Century Legislatures: Present Contours and Future Directions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9:319–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thurber, James A. 1999. “Republican Roles in Congressional Budget Reform: Twenty-Five Years of Deficit and Conflict.” In New Majority or Old Minority? The Impact of Republicans on Congress, eds. Nicol, C. Rae and Campbell, Colton, pp. 135–30. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Thurow, Lester. 1980. The Zero-Sum Society: Distribution and the Possibilities for Economic Change. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Tirole, Jean. 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Trochim, William. 2001. Research Methods Knowledge Base. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog Publishing.Google Scholar

Truman, David B. 1959. The Congressional Party. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Tufte, Edward R. 1975. “Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 69:812–826.CrossRef Google Scholar

Turner, Julius. 1951. Party and Constituency. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Turner, Julius, and Edward, V. Schneier. 1970. Party and Constituency: Pressures on Congress, revised edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

U.S. Congress. House Select Committee on Committees. Final Report, Committee Reform Amendments of 1974 (The Bolling Committee Report). 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., 1974. H. Rept. 93–916.

U.S. Congress. Joint Committee on the Organization of Congress. Hearings, part 3, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 1965. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

Uslaner, Eric M. 1974. Congressional Committee Assignments. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.Google Scholar

Waldman, Sidney. 1980. “Majority Leadership in the House of Representatives.” American Politics Quarterly 95:373–93.Google Scholar

Wattenberg, Martin P. 1984. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–80. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wattenberg, Martin P. 1998. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1996. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Watts, Ross L., and Jerold, L. Zimmerman. 1983. “Agency Problems, Auditing, and the Theory of the Firm: Some Evidence.” Journal of Law and Economics 26:613–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry R. 1979. “A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms.” American Journal of Political Science 23:245–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry R. 1989. “Floor Behavior in Congress: Committee Power under the Open Rule.” American Political Science Review 83:795–815.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry R., and Marshall, William. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress.” Journal of Political Economy 96:132–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry R., and Moran, Mark. 1983. “Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission.” Journal of Political Economy 91:775–800.CrossRef Google Scholar

Westefield, Louis P. 1974. “Majority Party Leadership and the Committee System in the House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 68:1593–1604.CrossRef Google Scholar

Whittle, Peter. 1982. Optimization over Time: Dynamic Programming and Stochastic Control. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E. 1967. “Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size.” Journal of Political Economy 73:123–38.CrossRef Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, Woodrow. 1885. Congressional Government. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Wolfensberger, Donald. 2003. “The Motion to Recommit in the House: The Creation, Evisceration, and Restoration of a Minority Right.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference December 5–6, San Diego.

Yoder, Edwin M. 1990. “The Party's Over, So Responsible Politics Called It a Day.” Washington Post Weekly, November.Google Scholar

Young, Garry, and Heitshusen, Valerie. 2003. “Party and the Dynamics of Congressional Committee Composition in the US House, 1947–1996.” British Journal of Political Science 33:659–79.CrossRef Google Scholar