Adserá, Alicia, Boix, Carles, and Payne, Mark. 2003. “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2): 445–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcántara, Manuel. 1994–2000. Proyecto Elites Latinoamericanos (PELA). Salamanca, Spain: Instituto Interuniversitario de Iberoamérica (Universidad de Salamanca).Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aleman, Eduardo, and Tsebelis, George. 2005. “Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in Latin America.” World Politics 57(3): 396–420.Google Scholar

Altman, David. 2005. “De un sistema paralelo a un compensatorio (proporcional personalizado).” Santiago, Chile: Instituto de Ciencia Politica, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile.Google Scholar

,American Political Science Association. 1950. Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar

Ames, Barry. 1995. “Electoral Strategy under Open List Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 39(2): 406–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ames, Barry. 2002. “Party Discipline in the Chamber of Deputies.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito, 185–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2002. “Presidential Cabinets, Electoral Cycles, and Coalition Discipline in Brazil.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito, 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2006. Presidencialismo e governabilidade nas Americas. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fundacion Getulio Vargas.Google Scholar

Amorim Neto, Octavio, Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2003. “Agenda Power in Brazil's Camara dos Deputados, 1989–98.” World Politics 55(4): 550–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Asamblea Nacional de Panamá. 2005. http://www.asamblea.gob.pa/.

,Associación de Derechos Civiles. 2004. “Ley de Reforma Laboral: Falencias de su votación.” Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar

Austen-Smith, David. 1994. “Strategic Transmission of Costly Information.” Econometrica 62: 955–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagehot, Walter. 1867. The English Constitution. Reprint, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Baldez, Lisa A., and Carey, John M.. 1999. “Presidential Agenda Control and Spending Policy: Lessons from General Pinochet's Constitution.” American Journal of Political Science 43(1): 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barczak, Monica. 2001. “Representation by Consultation? The Rise of Direct Democracy in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 43(3): 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bianco, William T., Spence, David B., and Wilkerson, John D.. 1996. “The Electoral Connection in the Early Congress: The Case of the Compensation Act of 1816.” American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 145–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Katz, Richard S.. 1999. “Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, ed. Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Katz, Richard S., 3–22. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Brady, David W., Cooper, Joseph, and Hurley, Patricia A.. 1977. “The Electoral Basis of Party Voting: Patterns and Trends in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In The Impact of the Electoral Process, ed. Misel, Louis and Cooper, Joseph, 133–65. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William R., and Golder, Matthew. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis.” Political Analysis 14: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brennan, Geoffrey, and Pettit, Philip. 1990. “Unveiling the Vote.” British Journal of Political Science 20(3): 311–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, Edmund. 1774. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. London: Henry G. Bohn.Google Scholar

Burns, John F., and Ives, Nat. 2005. “Shiites Win Most Votes in Iraq, Election Results Show.” New York Times, February 13, International sec., 1–22.Google Scholar

Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calvo, Ernesto. 2007. “The Responsive Legislature: Public Opinion and Discipline in a Highly Disciplined Legislature.” British Journal of Political Science 37: 263–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W., and Cogan, John F.. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, John M. 2002. “Parties and Coalitions in Chile in the 1990s.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito, 222–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, John M. 2003. “Discipline, Accountability, and Legislative Voting in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 35(2): 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, John M. 2007. “Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, John M., and Reinhardt, Gina Yanitell. 2004. “State-Level Institutional Effects on Legislative Coalition Unity in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(1): 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1998. “Calling Out the Tanks, or Filling Out the Forms?” In Executive Decree Authority, ed. Carey, John M. and Shugart, Matthew Soberg, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, Royce, Cox, Gary W., and Pachon, Monica. 2006. “How Political Parties Create Democracy, Chapter 2.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31(2): 153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Centro de Estudios Públicos. 2007. Estudio nacional de opinion pública. Santiago, Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos.Google Scholar

Cevasco Piedra, José. 2000. El Congreso del Perú: Un modelo de modernización. Lima: Ediciones del Congreso del Perú.Google Scholar

Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Democracy, Elections, and Accountability for Economic Outcomes.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C., 222–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheibub, José Antonio, Przeworski, Adam, and Saiegh, Sebastian M.. 2004. “Government Coalitions and Legislative Effectiveness under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism.” British Journal of Political Science 34: 565–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chhibber, Pradeep, and Kollman, Ken. 1998. “Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States.” American Political Science Review 92(2): 329–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarín, . 2004a. “La justicia resolvera si debe quedar registrado como vota cada diputado porteno.” Buenos Aires, Argentina. February 17. www.clarin.com.Google Scholar

Clarín, . 2004b. “Otra forma de votar las leyes.” Buenos Aires, Argentina. February 18. www.clarin.com.Google Scholar

Cleary, Matthew R., and Stokes, Susan C.. 2006. Democracy and the Culture of Skepticism: Political Trust in Argentina and Mexico. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Colomer, Josep M. 2001. Political Institutions: Democracy and Social Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Condorcet, Marquis. 1785. Essay on the Application of Analysis to the Probability of Majority Decisions (Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilté des decisions rendues a la pluralité des voix). Paris: De l'Imprimerie royale.Google Scholar

,Congreso del Perú. 1998. Diario de los debates. Primera Legislatura Ordinaria de 1998, 11a Sesión, 24 de setiembre.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael J. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidentialism, Partyarchy, and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael J. 1998. “The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems.” Party Politics 4(4): 547–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corrado, Anthony. 2002. “A History of Federal Campaign Finance Law.” In The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook, ed. Corrado, Anthony, Mann, Thomas, Ortiz, Daniel, and Potter, Trevor. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. http://www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/gs/cf/sourcebk01/HistoryChap.pdf.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1990. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 34(4): 903–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 2006a. “The Organization of Democratic Legislatures.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, ed. Weingast, Barry and Wittman, Donald, 141–61. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 2006b. “Evaluating Electoral Systems.” Revista de Ciencia Politica 26(1): 212–15.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., Masuyama, Mikitaka, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2000. “Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 1(1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Poole, Keith T.. 2004. “On Measuring Partisanship in Roll-Call Voting: The US House of Representatives, 1877–1999.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 477–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1995. “In the Absence of Vote Pooling: Nomination and Vote Allocation Errors in Colombia.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 441–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Thies, Michael F.. 1998. “The Cost of Intraparty Competition: The Single, Nontransferable Vote and Money Politics in Japan.” Comparative Political Studies 31(3): 267–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisp, Brian F., and Ingall, Rachel E.. 2002. “Institutional Engineering and the Nature of Representation: Mapping the Effects of Electoral Reform in Colombia.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 733–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisp, Brian, and Rey, Juan Carlos. 2001. “The Causes of Electoral Reform in Venezuela.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P., 173–93. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Culver, William W., and Ferrufino, Alfonso. 2000. “Diputados uninominales: La participacion politica en Bolivia.” Contribuciones 1: 1–28.Google Scholar

,Dallas Morning News. 2003a. “Editorial: Let the Sun Shine – Legislature Needs to Get Online with Records.” Dallas Morning News Online, April 1. http://www.dallasnews.com/.Google Scholar

,Dallas Morning News. 2003b. “Editorial: Let the Sun Shine – Excuses for Not Recording Votes Are Flimsy.” Dallas Morning News Online, March 31. http://www.dallasnews.com/.Google Scholar

Dawisha, Adeed, and Diamond, Larry. 2006. “Iraq's Year of Voting Dangerously.” Journal of Democracy 17(2): 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desposato, Scott. 2004a. “Going Negative in Comparative Perspective: The Impact of Electoral Rules on Campaign Strategy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 30–September 3.Google Scholar

Desposato, Scott. 2004b. “The Impact of Federalism on National Party Cohesion in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(2): 259–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desposato, Scott. 2005. “Correcting for Small-Group Cohesion in Roll Call Cohesion Scores.” British Journal of Political Science 35(4): 731–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desposato, Scott. 2006a. “Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party-Switching in Brazil's Chamber of Deputies.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desposato, Scott. 2006b. “Brazilian Political Reform: What Needs Fixing and How to Fix It.” Paper presented at the Center for Brazilian Studies, Oxford University, June 5.Google Scholar

Diermeier, Daniel, and Feddersen, Timothy J.. 1998. “Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure.” American Political Science Review 92(3): 611–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diez Canseco, Javier. 2001. “Impondra el Congreso mano blanda y lucro cesante?” La Republica, May 6, p. 24.Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties, Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

,El Tiempo. 2002. “Alvaro Uribe Velez radico proyecto de referendo en su primer acto de gobierno.” August 7. http://www.eltiempo.com/.

Erickson, Robert S. 1971. “The Electoral Impact of Congressional Roll Call Voting.” American Political Science Review 65: 1018–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, David M., and McAllister, Ian. 2004. “Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential Voting in Candidate-Centered Systems Make a Difference?” Paper presented at the University of California, Irvine. Posted in eScholarship Repository: http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/04-04.

Fearon, James D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C., 55–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C., 131–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Figueiredo, Argelina Cheibub, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32(2): 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischer, David. 2004. “The Politics of the Lula PT-led Coalition.” Paper prepared for the conference of the Latin American Studies Association, Las Vegas, NV, November 4–6.

Frye, Timothy. 1997. “A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies.” Comparative Political Studies 30(5): 523–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallagher, Michael. 1991. “Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 10: 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garman, Christopher, Haggard, Stephan, and Willis, Eliza. 2001. “Fiscal Decentralization: A Political Theory with Latin American Cases.” World Politics 53(2): 205–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerring, John, and Thacker, Strom C.. 2008. A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerring, John, Thacker, Strom C., and Moreno, C.. 2005. “Centripetal Democratic Governance: A Theory and Global Inquiry.” American Political Science Review 99(4): 567–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golden, Miriam A., and Chang, Eric C.C.. 2001. “Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy.” World Politics 53(4): 588–622. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/world_politics/ v053/53.4golden.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gonzalez Bertomeu, Juan F. 2004. Cada voto con su nombre: Votaciones nominales en el Poder Legislativo. Buenos Aires: Asociación por los Derechos Civiles.Google Scholar

Gunson, Phil. 2006. “Chavez's Venezuela.” Current History 105(688): 58–63.Google Scholar

Hallerberg, Mark, and Mairer, Patrik. 2004. “Executive Authority, the Personal Vote, and Budget Discipline in Latin American and Caribbean Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 571–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haspel, Moshe, Remington, Thomas, and Smith, Steven S.. 1998. “Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma.” Journal of Politics 60(2): 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellwig, Timothy, and Samuels, David. 2007. “Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 65–90.Google Scholar

Hix, Simon. 2002. “Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals: Preferences, Parties, and Voting in the European Parliament.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 688–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hix, Simon. 2004. “Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior – Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament.” World Politics 56(2): 194–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul, and Roland, Gerard. 2006. “Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament.” American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 494–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John D. 1996. “The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Political Science Review 90(2): 269–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John D., and Bingham Powell, G.. 1994. “Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy.” World Politics 46: 291–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huneeus, Carlos. “Binominalismo y calidad democratica.” La Tercera, Santiago, Chile, August 8, 2006, Opinion sec.Google Scholar

,International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. 1997. Handbook of Electoral Systems. Stockholm, Sweden: IDEA.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jeffrey A. 1999. “Examining the Bonding Effects of Party: A Comparative Analysis of Roll-Call Voting in the US and Confederate Houses.” American Journal of Political Science 43(4): 1144–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, Jeffrey A. 2000. “Examining the Robustness of Ideological Voting: Evidence from the Confederate House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 811–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, Jeffrey A., and Stewart III, Charles. 2003. “Out in the Open: The Emergence of Viva Voce Voting in House Speakership Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(4): 481–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Chris, Maley, William, Thier, Alexander, and Wardak, Ali. 2003. Afghanistan's Political and Constitutional Development. London: Overseas Development Institute and U.K. Department for International Development.Google Scholar

Johnson, Gregg, and Crisp, Brian F.. 2003. “Mandates, Powers, and Policies.” American Journal of Political Science 47(1): 127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Mark P., and Hwang, W.. 2005. “Party Government in Presidential Democracies: Extending Cartel Theory beyond the US Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, Richard S. 1994. “The 1993 Parliamentary Electoral Reform.” In Italian Politics, ed. Mershon, Carol and Pasquino, Gianfranco, 93–112. 9th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Kile, Orville M. 1948. The Farm Bureau through Three Decades. Baltimore: Waverly Press.Google Scholar

King, David C., and Zeckhauser, Richard J.. 2003. “Congressional Vote Options.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(3): 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 2000. “Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 212–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kulischeck, Michael, and Crisp, Brian F.. 2001. “The Consequences of Electoral Reform in Venezuela.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P., 404–31. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kunicová, Jana, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2005. “Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption.” British Journal of Political Science 35(4): 573–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,La Gaceta. 2001. “Congresistas que votaron y en contra de la revocatoria.” La Gaceta, 6 May, sec. 2.Google Scholar

Raja, Raymond J. 2003. “Why Soft Money Has Strengthened Parties.” In Inside the Campaign Finance Battle: Court Testimony on the New Reforms, ed. Corrado, Anthony, Mann, Thomas E., and Potter, Trevor, 69–98. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lanfranchi, Prisca, and Luthi, Ruth. 1999. “Cohesion of Party Groups and Interparty Conflict in the Swiss Parliament: Roll Call Voting in the National Council.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, ed. Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Katz, Richard S., 99–120. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

,Latin America Data Base. 2001. “Nicaragua: Governing Party and Sandinistas Nominate Presidential Candidates.” NotiCen: Central American & Caribbean Political & Economic Affairs 6(3).Google Scholar

,Latinobarómetro. 2003 Summary Report: Democracy and Economy. http://www.latinobarometro.org.

Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of 27 Democracies, 1945–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidentialism or Parliamentarism: Does It Make a Difference?” In The Failure of Presidential Democracy, ed. Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo, 3–90. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Londregan, John. 2001. Legislative Institutions and Ideology in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lowry, W. R., and Shipan, C. R.. 2002. “Party Differentiation in Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(1): 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luna, Juan P., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2005. “Political Representation in Latin America: A Study of Elite-Mass Congruence in Nine Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 38(4): 388–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott P. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott P., and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 1997. “Party Discipline in the Brazilian Constitutional Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(4): 453–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott P., and Scully, Timothy R.. 1995. “Party Systems in Latin America.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R., 1–36. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C.. 1999. “Elections and Representation.” In Elections, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C., 29–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, Thomas E. 2003. “Linking Knowledge and Action: Political Science and Campaign Finance Reform.” Perspective on Politics 17(1): 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marlowe, Ann. 2007. “Life of the Parties.” Wall Street Journal, January 29, A17.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mayorga, Rene. 2001. “Electoral Reform in Bolivia: Origins of the Mixed-Member Proportional System.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P., 194–208. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McCoy, J. L. 1999. “Chavez and the End of ‘Partyarchy’ in Venezuela.” Journal of Democracy 105(3): 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew D., and Rosenbluth, Frances McCall. 1995. “Party Provision for Personal Politics: Dividing the Vote in Japan.” In Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States, ed. Cowhey, Peter F. and McCubbins, Mathew D., 35–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McKelvey, Richard. 1976. “Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models: Some Implications for Agenda Control.” Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moe, Terry M., and Caldwell, Michael. 1994. “The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems.” Journal of Institutional Theoretical Economics 150(1): 171–95.Google Scholar

Molinar Horcacitas, Juan, and Weldon, Jeffrey. 2001. “Reforming Electoral Systems in Mexico.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P., 209–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, Jana, Espinal, Rosario, and Seligson, Mitchell A.. 2006. The Political Culture of the Dominican Republic in 2006. Nashville, TN: Latin American Public Opinion Project.Google Scholar

Morgenstern, Scott. 2003. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll Call Voting in Latin America and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morone, James A. 1990. The Democratic Wish: Popular Participation and the Limits of American Government. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Nicolau, Jairo Marconi. 2007. “O Sistema Eleitoral De Lista Aberta no Brasil.” In Instituições representativas no Brasil: Balanço e reforma, ed. Marconi Nicolau, Jairo and Power, Timothy J., 97–122. Rio de Janeiro: IUPERJ.Google Scholar

Odegard, Peter H. 1928. Pressure Politics: The Story of the Anti-Saloon League. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2007. Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Persson, Torsten, Roland, Gerard, and Tabellini, Guido. 1997. “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1163–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2003. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Persson, Torsten, Tabellini, Guido, and Trebbi, F.. 2003. “Electoral Rules and Corruption.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 958–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pharr, Susan J., Putnam, Robert D., and Dalton, Russell J.. 2000. “A Quarter-Century of Declining Confidence.” Journal of Democracy 11(2): 500–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. 1998. “Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales.” American Journal of Political Science 42(3): 954–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 29(2): 357–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. “D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress; A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26(1): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham, and Vanberg, Georg. 2000. “Election Laws, Disproportionality and Median Correspondence: Implications for Two Visions of Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 30(3): 383–411.Google Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham, and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Proyecto Élites Parlamentarias Latinoamericanas. 2006. Boletín n°6: Disciplina de voto y lealtad partidista. Salamanca, Spain: Instituto Interuniversitario de Iberoamérica (Universidad de Salamanca).Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. 2007. “Is the Science of Comparative Politics Possible?” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan C., 117–39. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Quinn, Kevin M., Monroe, Burt L., Colaresi, Michael, Crespin, Michael H., and Radev, Dragomir R.. 2006. “An Automated Method of Topic-Coding Legislative Speech over Time with Application to the 105th–108th U.S. Senate.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, September 2.

Rachadell, Manuel. 1991. “El sistema electoral y la reforma de los partidos.” In Venezuela, democracia y futuro: Los partidos politicos en la decada de los 90. Reflexiones para un cambio neceario, ed. Blanco, Carlos and Pisani, Edgar Paredes, 203–10. Caracas: Comision Presidencial para la Reforma del Estado.Google Scholar

Rasch, Bjorn E. 2000. “Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, Andrew. 2006. “The Curious Case of Afghanistan.” Journal of Democracy 17(2): 104–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rice, Stuart A. 1925. “The Behavior of Legislative Groups.” Political Science Quarterly 40: 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, Kenneth, and Wibbels, Erik. 1999. “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 575–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosas, Guillermo. 2005. “The Ideological Organization of Latin American Legislative Parties: An Empirical Analysis of Elite Policy Preferences.” Comparative Political Studies 7(824): 849.Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenthal, Howard, and Voeten, Erik. 2004. “Analyzing Roll Calls with Perfect Spatial Voting: France 1946–1958.” American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 620–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1763. “Voting.” In On the Social Contract, book IV, ch. XX. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Rubin, Barnett R. “The Wrong Voting System.” International Herald Tribune, March 16, International section.

Samuels, David. 2000. “Ambition and Competition: Explaining Legislative Turnover in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(3): 481–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, David. 2004. “Presidentialism and Accountability for the Economy in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 98(3): 425–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, David, and Shugart, Matthew S.. 2003. “Presidentialism, Elections, and Representation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(1): 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scarrow, Susan E. 2001a. “Direct Democracy and Institutional Change: A Comparative Investigation.” Comparative Political Studies 34(688): 651–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scarrow, Susan E. 2001b. “Germany: The Mixed-Member System as a Political Compromise.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P., 55–69. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Seligson, Mitchell A., Cordova, Abby B., Donoso, Juan Carlos, Morales, Daniel Moreno, Orces, Diana, and Blum, Vivian Schwarz. 2007. Democracy Audit: Bolivia 2006 Report. Nashville, TN: Latin American Public Opinion Project.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth. 1991. Models of Multiparty Electoral Competition. New York: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S. 1998. “The Inverse Relationship between Party Strength and Executive Strength: A Theory of Politicians' Constitutional Choices.” British Journal of Political Science 28(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S., and Carey, John M.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S., Moreno, Erika, and Fajardo, Luis E.. 2006. “Deepening Democracy by Renovating Political Practices: The Struggle for Electoral Reform in Colombia.” In Peace, Democracy, and Human Rights in Colombia, ed. Welna, Christopher and Gallon, Gustavo, 202–66. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S., Valdini, Melody E., and Suominen, K.. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 437–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S., and Wattenberg, Martin P., eds. 2001. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?New York: Oxford University Press.

Siavelis, Peter. 2000. The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Sieberer, Ulrich. 2006. “Party Unity in Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Legislative Studies 12(2): 150–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singer, Judith D. 1998. “Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 24(4): 323–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skeen, C. Edward. 1986. “Vox Populi, Vox Dei: The Compensation Act of 1816 and the Rise of Popular Politics.” Journal of the Early Republic 6(253): 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Steven S. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Snyder, James M., and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, James M., and Ting, Michael M.. 2005. “Why Roll Calls? A Model of Position Taking in Legislative Voting and Elections.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 21(1): 153–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steenbergen, Marco R., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sundquist, James L. 1981. The Decline and Resurgence of Congress. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew Sobert. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Tapia G., Sady. 2004. “Legisladores ‘huyen’ del voto electrónico.” La Prensa, March 25. La Prensa Web, http://www.prensa.com/.Google Scholar

,Texas State Legislature. 2005. “Texas Legislature Online.” http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlo/legislation/voteinfo.htm.

Thames, Francis C. 2007. “Searching for the Electoral Connection: Parliamentary Party Switching in the Ukrainian Rada, 1998–2002.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(2): 223–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 1999. “Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 591–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ungar Bleier, Elisabeth. 2002. “Consideraciones sobre la reforma politica.” Testimony before the Comisión Primera Constitucional del Senado de la República. Bogotá.Google Scholar

,United States Supreme Court. 1958. Majority Decision in NAACP v. Alabama Ex Rel. Patterson, Attorney General. No. 91 Supreme Court of the United States 357 U.S. 449; 78 S. Ct. 1163.Google Scholar

Valenzuela, Arturo. 1994. “Party Politics and the Crisis of Presidentialism in Chile: A Proposal for a Parliamentary Form of Government.” In The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America, vol. 2, ed. Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo, 91–150. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

,VoteWorld. 2008. VoteWorld: The International Legislative Roll-Call Voting Website. http://ucdata.berkeley.edu:7101/new_web/VoteWorld/voteworld/.

Wallack, Jessica S., Gaviria, A., Panizza, Ugo, and Stein, Eduardo. 2003. “Particularism around the World.” World Bank Economic Review 17(1): 133–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weldon, Jeffrey. 1997. “Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Mainwaring, Scott P., 225–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weldon, Jeffrey. 2001. “The Consequences of Mexico's Mixed-Member Electoral System, 1988–1997.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P., 447–74. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 1996. Democracy without Equity: Failures of Reform in Brazil. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

White, Leonard D. 1951. The Jeffersonians: A Study in Administrative History, 1801–1829. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Whiteley, Paul F., and Seyd, Patrick. 1999. “Discipline in the British Conservative Party: The Attitudes of Party Activists toward the Role of Their Members of Parliament.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, ed. Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Katz, Richard S., 53–71. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar