Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 From the subject of evil to the evil subject: Cultural difference in postapartheid South African crime fiction
- 3 Freedom on a frontier? The double bind of (white) postapartheid South African literature
- 4 The transitional calm before the postapartheid storm
- 5 Biopsies on the body of the ‘new’ South Africa
- 6 Referred pain, wound culture and pathology in postapartheid writing
- 7 Fiction's response
- Notes
- Works cited
- Index
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 From the subject of evil to the evil subject: Cultural difference in postapartheid South African crime fiction
- 3 Freedom on a frontier? The double bind of (white) postapartheid South African literature
- 4 The transitional calm before the postapartheid storm
- 5 Biopsies on the body of the ‘new’ South Africa
- 6 Referred pain, wound culture and pathology in postapartheid writing
- 7 Fiction's response
- Notes
- Works cited
- Index
Summary
This is not a study of postapartheid South African literature. Rather, it is study in that vast field of writing. I do not believe a coherent a study of this dizzyingly heterogeneous corpus is possible, short of the encyclopaedic method (a curated series of topics written by many different writers, or alphabetical listings). Such a ‘companion’ approach remains the default option, and it is duly taken by David Attwell and Derek Attridge, along with their 41 fellow contributors to The Cambridge History of South African Literature, and by Gareth Cornwell, Dirk Klopper and Craig MacKenzie in The Columbia Guide to South African Literature since 1945. And still, as these compilers might themselves acknowledge, there will be significant gaps. This book, in contrast to such works of general coverage, proposes a way of examining the distinctive features of South African literature after apartheid. Put differently, it delineates certain through-lines that characterise postapartheid writing. Although these lines are, in my view, prominent and important, they remain a partial set of concerns. This relation of single study to corpus may be viewed via the analogy of a hologram. Take this angle of view, and the shape emerges thus; tilt the hologram surface, or change your own angle of looking, and the object under view suddenly looks quite different. All the shapes brought into view, in their provisional wholeness, have validity – call them alternative manifestations of the complexity of the entity under examination. Such an approach allows the making of bold conceptual propositions without resorting to the fixity, and the closure, of all-consuming metanarratives. It means that in advancing a theory about the corpus of work under scrutiny, or more accurately within that body of work as a whole, one's conceptual model is acknowledged as partial (e.g. Shaun Viljoen, Richard Rive: A Partial Biography). Like Viljoen, one acknowledges, in addition, one's own partiality too: this is my reading of things, or my reading. Other readings are possible, indeed necessary. Please join the party. Write your own study. But for a moment, consider this one. Perhaps it will influence your own perspective on the field we share, though from different angles of view. This book, then, in full awareness of the risks inherent in such an undertaking, proposes a set of related ideas as a way of conceptualising certain emphases, perhaps, in South African literature after apartheid.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Losing the PlotCrime, Reality and Fiction in Postapartheid Writing, pp. 1 - 33Publisher: Wits University PressPrint publication year: 2016