Book contents
- Macroprudential Policy and Practice
- Macroeconomic Policy Making
- Macroprudential Policy and Practice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 The Macroeconomics of Macroprudential Policies
- 2 A Liquidity-Based Approach to Macroprudential Policy*
- 3 Financial Intermediation and Monetary and Macroprudential Policies
- 4 The New Art of Central Banking
- 5 The Macroprudential Countercyclical Capital Buffer in Basel III
- 6 On the Use of Monetary and Macroprudential Policies for Small Open Economies
- 7 Capital Flows and Macroprudential Policy
- 8 Macroprudential Policy in a Globalised World
- 9 Systemic Risk of European Banks
- 10 Macroprudential Tools of Systemic Risk Analysis
- 11 When Is Macroprudential Policy Effective?
- 12 Macroprudential Policy
- Index
- References
5 - The Macroprudential Countercyclical Capital Buffer in Basel III
Implications for Monetary Policy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 August 2018
Book contents
- Macroprudential Policy and Practice
- Macroeconomic Policy Making
- Macroprudential Policy and Practice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 The Macroeconomics of Macroprudential Policies
- 2 A Liquidity-Based Approach to Macroprudential Policy*
- 3 Financial Intermediation and Monetary and Macroprudential Policies
- 4 The New Art of Central Banking
- 5 The Macroprudential Countercyclical Capital Buffer in Basel III
- 6 On the Use of Monetary and Macroprudential Policies for Small Open Economies
- 7 Capital Flows and Macroprudential Policy
- 8 Macroprudential Policy in a Globalised World
- 9 Systemic Risk of European Banks
- 10 Macroprudential Tools of Systemic Risk Analysis
- 11 When Is Macroprudential Policy Effective?
- 12 Macroprudential Policy
- Index
- References
Summary
Basel III is a comprehensive set of reform measures in banking regulation, supervision and risk management with a strong macroprudential component, which has the aim of preventing future crises by creating a sound financial system. Nevertheless, these changes on financial regulation have to co-ordinate with monetary policy. We address several key research questions. First, we analyse how the higher capital requirements implied by Basel I, II and III affect welfare for a given monetary policy of different agents in the economy. Second, we study how these regulations affect the way monetary policy needs to be conducted. Finally, we propose an automatic rule to implement the macroprudential countercyclical buffer in Basel III and find the optimal parameters for this rule and for monetary policy. We conclude that a Pareto-superior outcome can be reached using the optimal values, and the macroprudential objective can be achieved.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Macroprudential Policy and Practice , pp. 108 - 134Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Acharya, V. V. (2009). ‘A theory of systemic risk and design of prudential bank regulation’, Journal of Financial Stability, vol 5, no 3, 224–255.Google Scholar
Akram, Q. F. (2014). ‘Macro effects of capital requirements and macroprudential policy’, Economic Modelling, vol 2, 77–93.Google Scholar
Angelini, P., Neri, S. and Panetta, F. (2014). ‘The interaction between Countercyclical Capital Requirements and monetary policy’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol 46, no 6, 1073–1112.Google Scholar
Angeloni, I. and Faia, E. (2013). ‘Capital regulation and monetary policy with fragile banks’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol 60, no 3, 311–324.Google Scholar
Antipa, P., Mengus, E. and Mojon, B. (2010). ‘Would macroprudential policy have prevented the Great Recession?’ Mimeo, Banque de France.Google Scholar
Cecchetti, S. G. and Kharroubi, E. (2012). Reassessing the impact of finance on growth, BIS Working Paper Series, no 381.Google Scholar
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2010a). Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems, BIS document.Google Scholar
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2010b). Guidance for national authorities operating the Countercyclical Capital Buffer, BIS document.Google Scholar
Beck, T., Degryse, H. and Kneer, C. (2014). ‘Is more finance better? Disentangling intermediation and size effects of financial systems’, Journal of Financial Stability, vol 10, 50–64.Google Scholar
Benigno, P. and Woodford, M. (2012). ‘Linear-quadratic approximation of optimal policy problems,’ Journal of Economic Theory, vol 147, no 1, 1–42.Google Scholar
Bernanke, B. S., Gertler, M. and Gilchrist, S. (1999). The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. In: Handbook of Macroeconomics, ed. by Taylor, J. B. and Woodford, M., vol 1, chap. 21, pp. 1341–1393, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Borio, C. (2003). Towards a macroprudential framework for financial supervision and regulation? BIS Working Papers, no 128.Google Scholar
Borio, C. (2011). Rediscovering the macroeconomic roots of financial stability policy: Journey, challenges and a way forward. BIS Working Papers, no 354.Google Scholar
Borio, C. and Shim, I. (2007). What can (macro-)policy do to support monetary policy?, BIS Working Paper, no 242.Google Scholar
Brunnermeier, M., Crockett, A., Goodhart, C., Persaud, A. and Shin, H. (2009). ‘The fundamental principles of financial regulation’, Geneva Report on the World Economy 11, ICCBM, Geneva and CEPR, London.Google Scholar
Brzoza-Brzezina, M., Kolasa, M., Makarski, K., 2013. Macroprudential policy andimbalances in the euro area, NBP Working Paper, 138.Google Scholar
Clerc, L., Derviz, L., Mendicino, C., Moyen, S., Nikolov, K., Stracca, L., Suarez, J. and Vardulakis, A. (2014). ‘The 3D model: A framework to assess capital regulation,’ Economic Bulletin and Financial Stability Report Articles, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.Google Scholar
Drehmann, M. and Gambacorta, L. (2011). ‘The effects of Countercyclical Capital Buffers on bank lending’, Applied Economics Letters, vol 19, no 7, 603–608.Google Scholar
Domeij, D. and Flodén, M. (2006). The labor-supply elasticity and borrowing constraints: why estimates are biased. Review of Economic Dynamics, 9, 242–262.Google Scholar
European Commission (2013). Scientific evidence for policy-making. Research insights from Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
Gambacorta, L. and Mistrulli, P. E. (2004). ‘Does bank capital affect lending behavior?’, Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol 13, 436–457.Google Scholar
Gerali, A., Neri, S., Sessa, S. and Signoretti, F. (2010). Credit and banking in a DSGE model of the euro area. Bank of Italy Economic Working Papers, no 740.Google Scholar
Gertler, M. and Karadi, P. (2011). ‘A model of unconventional monetary policy,’ Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol 58, no 1, 17–34.Google Scholar
Gertler, M. and Kiyotaki, N. (2010). ‘Financial intermediation and credit policy in business cycle analysis’, in Friedman, B. and Woodford, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Monetary Economics. Pp. 547–599. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Iacoviello, M. (2005). ‘House prices, borrowing constraints and monetary policy in the business cycle’, American Economic Review, vol 95, no 3, 739–764.Google Scholar
Iacoviello, M. (2015). ‘Financial business cycles’, Review of Economic Dynamics, vol 18, no 1, 140–164.Google Scholar
Iacoviello, M. and Neri, S. (2010). Housing market spillovers: Evidence from an estimated DSGE model. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, vol 2, 125–164.Google Scholar
Kannan, P., Rabanal, P. and Scott, A. (2012). ‘Monetary and macroprudential policy rules in a model with house price booms’, The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, Contributions, vol 12, no 1, 1–44.Google Scholar
Kant, R. and Jain, S. (2013). ‘Critical assessment of capital buffers under Basel III’, Indian Journal of Finance, vol 7, no 4, 6–12.Google Scholar
Kydland, F. and Prescott, E. (1982). Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, vol 50, no 6, 1345–1370.Google Scholar
Kishan, R. P. and Opiela, T. P. (2000). ‘Bank size, bank capital and the bank lending channel’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol 32, 121–141.Google Scholar
Lawrance, E. (1991). ‘Poverty and the rate of time preference: Evidence from paneldata.’ Journal of Political Economy, vol 99, no 1, 54–77.Google Scholar
Longworth, D. (2011). A Survey of Macro- prudential Policy Issues. Mimeo, Carleton University.Google Scholar
Meh, C. A. and Moran, K. (2010). ‘The role of bank capital in the propagation of shocks’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol 34, no 3, 555–576.Google Scholar
Mendicino, C. and Pescatori, A. (2007). Credit frictions, housing prices and optimalmonetary policy rules. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Monacelli, T. (2006). Optimal monetary policy with collateralized household debtand borrowing constraint. In: Conference Proceedings “Monetary Policy and Asset Prices” edited by J. Campbell.Google Scholar
N’Diaye, P. (2009). Countercyclical macro prudential policies in a supporting role to monetary policy. IMF Working Paper, November.Google Scholar
Official Journal of the European Union (14–02–2012). Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board of 22 December 2011 on the macroprudential mandate of national authorities.Google Scholar
Official Journal of the European Union, (15–06–2013). Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board of 4 April 2013 on intermediate objectives and instruments of macroprudential policy.Google Scholar
Philippon, T. (2008). Why has the US financial sector grown so much? The role of corporate finance, NBER Working Paper Series, no 13405.Google Scholar
Philippon, T. and Reshef, A. (2013). ‘An international look at the growth of modern finance: Income and human capital costs,’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol 27, no 2, spring, 73–96.Google Scholar
Repullo, R. and Saurina, J. (2012). ‘The Countercyclical Capital Buffer of Basel III: A Critical Assessment’. In The Crisis Aftermath: New Regulatory Paradigms. Dewatripont, M. and Freixas, X. (Eds.). Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London.Google Scholar
Repullo, R. and Suarez, J. (2013). ‘The procyclical effects of bank capital regulation’, Review of Financial Studies, vol 26, no 2, 452–490.Google Scholar
Rubio, M. (2011). ‘Fixed- and variable-rate mortgages, business cycles, and monetary policy’. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol 43, no 4, 657–688.Google Scholar
Rubio, M. and Carrasco-Gallego, J. (2013). ‘Macroprudential measures, housing markets, and monetary policy’, Moneda y Crédito, no 235, 29–59.Google Scholar
Rubio, M. and Carrasco-Gallego, J. (2014). ‘Macroprudential and monetary policies: Implications for financial stability and welfare’, Journal of Banking & Finance, vol 49, 326–336.Google Scholar
Rubio, M. and Carrasco-Gallego, J. (2016). ‘The new financial regulation in Basel III and monetary policy: A macroprudential approach’, Journal of Financial Stability, vol 26, 294–305.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Grohe, S. and Uribe, M. (2004). ‘Solving dynamic general equilibrium modelsusing a second-order approximation to the policy function’, Journal of Economic and Dynamic Control, vol 28, 755–775.Google Scholar
Scitovszky, T. (1941). ‘A note on welfare propositions in economics’, The Review of Economic Studies, vol 9, no 1, 77–88.Google Scholar
Van den Heuvel, S. J. (2008). ‘The welfare cost of bank capital requirements’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol 55, no 2, 298–320.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by