Acock, M. 1983. “The age of the universe,” Philosophy of Science 50 (1): 130–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, R. M. 1976. “Estimates of speeds of dinosaurs,” Nature 261: 129–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, C., Bekoff, M. and Lauder, G. (eds.) 1998. Nature's purposes: analyses of function and design in biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Alvarez, W. et al. 1980. “Extraterrestrial cause for the cretaceous-tertiary extinction,” Science 208: 1095–1108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anfinrude, P. and Schotte, F. 2005. “X-ray fingerprinting of chemical intermediates in solution,” Science 309 (5738): 1192–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, R. T. 1986. The dinosaur heresies. New York: Kensington Publishing.Google Scholar

Barlow, C. 2000. The ghosts of evolution: Nonsensical fruit, missing partners, and other ecological anachronisms. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bell, G. L., Jr. 1997. “Introduction [to the Mosasauridae],” in Callaway, J. M. and Nicholls, E. L. (eds.), Ancient marine reptiles. New York: Academic Press, 281–292.Google Scholar

Ben-Menahem, Y. 1997. “Historical contingency,” Ratio 10 (2): 991–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benton, M. J. 1995. “Diversification and extinction in the history of life,” Science 268 (5207): 52–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benton, M. J. 1997. “Models for the diversification of life,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12 (12): 490–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benton, M. J. 1999. “The history of life: Large databases in palaeontology,” in Harper, D. A. T. (ed.), Numerical palaeobiology: Computer-based modeling and analysis of fossils and their distribution. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 249–283.Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. 2002. “Realism: Deconstructing the debate,” Ratio 15 (2): 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, S. 2005. Truth: A guide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. 1985. “Lex orandi est lex credendi,” in Churchland, P. M. and Hooker, C. A. (eds.), Images of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–34.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. 1984. “The current status of scientific realism,” in Leplin, J. (ed.), Scientific realism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 41–82.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. 1990. “Realism, approximate truth, and method,” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14: 355–391.Google Scholar

Buller, D. (ed.) 1999. Function, selection, and design. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Carman, C. 2005. “The electrons of the dinosaurs and the center of the earth,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36 (1): 171–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cleal, C. J., and Thomas, B. A. 1999. Plant fossils: The history of land vegetation. Rochester, NY: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar

Cleland, C. 2002. “Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science,” Philosophy of Science 69 (3): 474–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coles, J. 1973. Archaeology by experiment. London: Hutchinson and Company.Google Scholar

Collins, D. 1996. “The ‘evolution’ of Anomalocaris and its classification in the Arthropod class Dinocarida and order Radiodonta,” Journal of Paleontology 70: 280–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuddington, K., and M. Ruse 2004. “Biodiversity, Darwin, and the fossil record,” in Oksanen, M. and Pietarinen, J. (eds.), Philosophy and biodiversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devitt, M. 1991. Realism and truth, second edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Donnadieu, Y., Fluteau, F., Ramstein, G., et al. 2003. “Is there a conflict between the Neoproterozoic glacial deposits and the snowball Earth interpretation: an improved understanding with numerical modeling,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters 208: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dummett, M. 1979. “The reality of the past,” in Truth and other enigmas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 358–374.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 2003. “Truth and the past,” Journal of Philosophy, 100: 5–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, D. A. D. 2000. “Stratigraphic, geochronological, and paleomagnetic constraints upon the neoproterozoic climate paradox,” American Journal of Science 300: 347–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farlow, J. O. 1992. “Sauropod tracks and trackmakers: integrating the ichnological and skeletal records,” Zubia 10: 89–138.Google Scholar

Farlow, J. O. and M. G. Lockley 1989. “Roland T. Bird, dinosaur tracker: An appreciation,” in Gillette, D. D. and Lockley, M. G. (eds.), Dinosaur tracks and traces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–36.Google Scholar

Feinberg, G., Lavine, S., and Albert, D. 1992. “Knowledge of the past and the future,” The Journal of Philosophy 89: 607–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, A. 1984. “The natural ontological attitude,” in Leplin, J. (ed.), Scientific realism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 83–107.Google Scholar

Fine, A. 1986. “Unnatural attitudes: Realist and instrumentalist attachments to science,” Mind 95: 149–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

fine, A. 1996. The shaky game: Einstein, realism, and the quantum theory, second edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, P. E. et al. 2000. “Cardiovascular evidence for an intermediate or higher metabolic rate in an ornithiscian dinosaur,” Science 288: 503–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friedman, M. 1974. “Explanation and scientific understanding,” Journal of Philosophy, 71: 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallie, W. B. 1959. “Explanations in history and the genetic sciences,” in Gardiner, P. (ed.), Theories of history. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Gero, J. M. 1989. “Producing prehistory, controlling the past: the case of New England beehives,” in Pinsky, V. and Wylie, A. (eds.), Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: Essays in the philosophy, history, and socio-politics of archaeology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 96–103.Google Scholar

Gottelli, D., Silleri-Zubiri, C., Appelbaum, G. D. et al. 1994. “Molecular genetics of the most endangered canid: the Ethiopian Wolf, Canis simensis,” Molecular Ecology 3: 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1980. “The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary discipline,” Paleobiology 6 (1): 96–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1987. Time's arrow, time's cycle: Myth and metaphor in the discovery of geological time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1989. Wonderful life: The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1991. Bully for Brontosaurus. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. 1979. “The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B205: 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grantham, T. 1999. “Explanatory pluralism in paleobiology,” Philosophy of Science 66 (supp.): S223-S236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, B. 1999. The elegant universe: Superstrings, hidden dimensions and the quest for the ultimate theory. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, I. 1999. The social construction of what?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hanen, M. and J. Kelley 1989. “Inference to the best explanation in archaeology,” in Pinsky, V. and Wylie, A. (eds.), Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: Essays in the philosophy, history, and socio-politics of archaeology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 14–17.Google Scholar

Harré, R. 1986. Varieties of realism: A rationale for the natural sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harré, R. 1996. “From observability to manipulability: Extending the inductive arguments for realism,” Synthese 108 (2): 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hempel, C. G. 1965. Aspects of scientific explanation, and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Hempel, C. G. 1966. Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, E. 1858/1974. A Report on the sandstone of the Connecticut valley, especially its fossil footmarks. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar

Hoffman, P. F., Kaufman, A. J., Halverson, G. P., and Schrag, D. P.. 1998. “A neoproterozoic snowball Earth,” Science 281 (5381): 1342–1346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoffman, P. F. and Schrag, D. P. 2000. “Snowball Earth,” Scientific American 282 (1): 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopson, J. A. 1975. “The evolution of cranial display structures in hadrosaurine dinosaurs,” Paleobiology 1: 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horwich, P. 1982. Probability and evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horwich, P. 1987. Asymmetries in time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Horwich, P. 1991. “On the nature and norms of theoretical commitment,” Philosophy of Science 38 (51): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, N. 1999. “Statistical and imaging methods applied to deformed fossils,” in Harper, D. A. T., (ed.), Numerical paleobiology: Computer-based modeling and analysis of fossils and their distributions. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 126–155.Google Scholar

Hull, D. L. 1975. “Central subjects and historical narratives,” History and Theory 14: 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huss, J. E. 2004. “Experimental reasoning in non-experimental science: Case studies from paleobiology,” unpublished PhD thesis, University of Chicago. UMI number 3125619.

Hyde, W. T., Crowley, T. J., Baum, S. K., and Peltier, W. R. 2000. “Neoproterozoic ‘snowball Earth’ simulations with a coupled climate/ice sheet model,” Nature 405 (6785): 425–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jacobsen, S. B. 2001. “Gas hydrates and deglaciations,” Nature 412 (6848): 691–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jaffe, M. 2000. The gilded dinosaur. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar

Janzen, D. H. and Martin, P. S. 1982. “Neotropical anachronisms: The fruits the Gomphotheres ate,” Science 215: 19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jenkins, G. S. 2000. “The ‘Snowball Earth’ and Precambrian climate,” Science 288: 975–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judson, O. 2006. “Affairs to remember,” The New York Times (May 28), section 4, p. 10.Google Scholar

Kasting, and Caldeira, 1992. “Susceptibility of the early earth to irreversible glaciation caused by carbon-dioxide clouds,” Nature 359: 226–228.Google Scholar

Kemp, T. S. 1999. Fossils and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kennedy, M. J., Christie-Blick, N., and Sohl, L. E. 2001. “Are proterozoic cap carbonates and isotopic excursions a record of gas hydrate destabilization following Earth's coldest intervals?,” Geology 29 (5): 446–446.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerr, R. 2000. “An appealing snowball Earth that's still hard to swallow,” Science 287 (5459): 1734–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkham, R. L. 1992. Theories of truth: A critical introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kirschvink, J. L. 1992. “Late proterozoic low-latitude global glaciation: The snowball Earth,” in Schopf, J. W. and Klein, C. (eds.), The proterozoic biosphere: A multidisciplinary approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirschvink, J. L., Gaidos, E. J., Bertani, L. E. et al. 2000. “Paleoproterozoic snowball Earth: Extreme climatic and geochemical global change and its biological consequences,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97 (4): 1400–1405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kitcher, P. 1989. “Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world,” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 13: 410–450.Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. 1993. The advancement of science: science without legend, objectivity without illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kleinhans, M. G., Buskes, C. J. J., and , H. W. Regt 2005. “Terra Incognita: Explanation and reduction in earth science,” International Studies in Philosophy of Science 19 (3): 289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kosso, P. 2001. Knowing the past: Philosophical issues of history and archaeology. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kukla, A. 1994. “Non-empirical theoretical virtues and the argument from underdetermination,” Erkenntnis 41: 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kukla, A. 1996. “Does every theory have empirically equivalent rivals?,” Erkenntnis 44: 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kukla, A. 2000. Social constructivism and the philosophy of science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ladyman, J. 1999. “Review of Jarrett Leplin, A novel defense of scientific realism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50: 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, L. 1971. “William Whewell on the consilience of inductions,” Monist 55: 368–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, L. 1981/1996. “A confutation of convergent realism,” in Papineau, D. (ed.), The philosophy of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–138.Google Scholar

Laudan, L. and Leplin, J. 1991. “Empirical equivalence and underdetermination,” Journal of Philosophy 88: 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Leather, J., Allen, P. A., Brasier, M. D., and Cozzi, A. 2002. “Neoproterozoic snowball Earth under scrutiny: Evidence from the Fiq glaciation of Oman,” Geology 30 (10): 891–894.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leplin, J. 1997. A novel defense of scientific realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1979. “Counterfactual dependence and time's arrow,” Nous 13: 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipton, P. 1991. Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lipton, P. 1993. “Is the best good enough?,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93: 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lockley, M. G. et al. 1994. “The distribution of sauropod tracks and trackmakers,” Gaia 10: 233–248.Google Scholar

Lynch, M. P. 2004. True to life: Why truth matters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

McGrew, T. 2003. “Confirmation, heuristics, and explanatory reasoning,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKay, C. P. 2000. “Thickness of tropical ice and photosynthesis on a snowball Earth,” Geophysical Research Letters 27 (14): 2153–2156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McMullin, E. 1984. “A case for scientific realism,” in Leplin, J. (ed.), Scientific realism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 8–40.Google Scholar

Martin, L. D. and Rothschild, B. M. 1987. “Avascular necrosis: Occurrence in diving cretaceous mosasaurs,” Science 236: 75–77.Google Scholar

Martin, L. D. and Rothschild, B. M. 1989. “Paleopathology and diving mosasaurs,” American Scientist 77: 460–466.Google Scholar

Massare, J. 1988. “Swimming capabilities of Mesozoic marine reptiles: implications for method of predation,” Paleobiology 14 (2): 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maxwell, G. l962/1999. “The ontological status of theoretical entities,” in Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in The Philosophy of Science, vol. Ⅲ.Google Scholar

Mayo, D. 1991. “Novel evidence and severe tests,” Philosophy of Science 58: 523–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayo, D. 1997. “Severe tests, arguing from error, and methodological underdetermination,” Philosophical Studies 86: 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melnyk, A. 1997. “How to keep the “physical’ in physicalism,” Journal of Philosophy 94 (12): 622–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millgram, E. 2000. “Coherence: The price of the ticket,” Journal of Philosophy 97 (2): 82–93.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. 1998. The last dinosaur book: The life and times of a cultural icon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Musgrave, A. 1989. “NOA's Ark – fine for realism,” Philosophical Quarterly 39: 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Musgrave, A. 1999. “Idealism and antirealism,” in Klee, R. (ed.), Scientific inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 344–352.Google Scholar

Nagel, E. 1979. The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publications.Google Scholar

Newton-Smith, W. H. 1987. “Realism and inference to the best explanation,” Fundamenta Scientiae 7: 305–316.Google Scholar

Nojima, S., Schal, C., Webster, F. X. et al. 2005. “Identification of the sex pheromone of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica,” Science 307 (5712): 1104–1106.Google ScholarPubMed

Nola, R. 2002. “Realism through manipulation, and by hypothesis,” in Clarke, S. and Lyons, T. D. (eds.), Recent themes in the philosophy of science: scientific realism and commonsense. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noonan, J. P., Hofreiter, M., Smith, D. et al. 2005. “Genomic sequencing of pleistocene cave bears,” Science 309 (5734): 597–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Norman, D. 1988. The prehistoric world of the dinosaur. New York: Gallery Books.Google Scholar

Padian, K. and Olsen, P. E. 1984. “The track of Pteraichnus: not Pterosaurian, but Crocodilian,” Journal of Paleontology 58: 178–184.Google Scholar

Padian, K. and P. E. Olsen 1989. “Ratite footprints and the stance and gait of mesozoic therapods,” in Gillette, D. D. and Lockley, M. (eds.), Dinosaur tracks and traces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231–242.Google Scholar

Parsons, K. M. 2001. Drawing out leviathan: dinosaurs and the science wars. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Patterson, C. and Smith, A. B. 1987. “Is periodicity of mass extinctions a taxonomic artifact?,” Nature 330: 248–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, C. and Smith, A. B. 1989. “Periodocity in extinction: the role of systematics,” Ecology 70: 802–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, N., Richter, D. J., Gnerre, S. et al. 2006. “Genetic evidence for complex speciation of humans and chimpanzees,” Nature (advance online publication 17 May). Available online at www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/pdf/nature04789.pdf. Last accessed June 4, 2006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Post, J. F. 1987. The faces of existence: An essay in nonreductive metaphysics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Post, J. F. 1996. “The foundationalism in irrealism, and the immorality,” Journal of Philosophical Research, 21, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific realism: How science tracks truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. 1978. Meaning and the moral sciences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. 1981. Reason, truth, and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, H. 1984. “What is realism?,” in Leplin, J. (ed.), Scientific realism. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 140–153.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. 1975. “On empirically equivalent systems of the world,” Erkenntnis 9: 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raup, D. M., Gould, S. J., Schopf, T. J. M., and Simberloff, D. S. 1973. “Stochastic models of phylogeny and the evolution of diversity,” Journal of Geology 81: 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raup, D. M. and Gould, S. J. 1974. “Stochastic simulation and evolution of morphology – Towards a nomothetic paleobiology,” Systematic Zoology 23 (2): 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raup, D. M. and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. “Periodicity of extinctions in the geologic past,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 81: 801–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Raup, D. M. and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1986. “Periodic extinctions of families and genera,” Science 231: 833–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, A. 1996. “A field guide to recent species of naturalism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouse, J. 1996. Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Rowe, T., McBride, E. F., and Sereno, P. C. 2001. “Dinosaur with a heart of stone,” Science 291: 783a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Runnegar, B. 2000. “Loophole for snowball Earth,” Nature 405 (6785): 403–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ruse, M. 1999. Mystery of mysteries: Is evolution a social construction?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1921. The analysis of mind. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Salmon, M. H. 1982. Philosophy and archaeology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sato, T., Cheng, Y., Wu, X. et al. 2005. “A pair of shelled eggs inside a female dinosaur,” Science 308 (5720): 375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Savitt, S. F., 1990. “Epistemological time asymmetry,” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1: 317–324.Google Scholar

Schweitzer, M. H., Wittmeyer, J. L., Horner, J. R., and Toporski, J. K. 2005. “Soft-tissue vessels and cellular preservation in Tyrannosaurus rex,” Science 307 (5717):1952–1955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1978. “A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. I. Analysis of marine orders,” Paleobiology 4: 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1979. “A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. Ⅱ. Early Paleozoic families and multiple equilibria,” Paleobiology 5: 222–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1982. A compendium of fossil marine families. Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology 51.Google Scholar

Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. “A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. Ⅲ. Post-paleozoic families and mass extinctions,” Paleobiology 10: 246–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. and Kendrick, D. C. 1993. “Numerical experiments with model monophyletic and paraphyletic taxa,” Paleobiology 19: 168–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sheldon, A. 1997. “Ecological implications of mosasaur bone microstructure,” in Callaway, J. M. and Nicholls, E. L., (eds.), Ancient Marine Reptiles. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Smart, J. J. C. 1963. Philosophy and scientific realism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sober, E. 1988. Reconstructing the past: Parsimony, evolution, and inference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stanford, P. K. 2000. “An antirealist explanation of the success of science,” Philosophy of Science 67 (2): 266–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanford, P. K. 2001. “Refusing the Devil's bargain: What kind of underdetermination should we take seriously?,” Philosophy of Science 68(Supplement): S1-S12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinbok, R. T. 1989. “Ichnology of the Connecticut Valley: A vignette of American science in the early nineteenth century,” in Gillette, D. D. and Lockley, M. G. (eds.), Dinosaur tracks and traces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–32.Google Scholar

Taylor, M. A. 1994. “Stone, bone, and blubber? Buoyancy control strategies in aquatic tetrapods,” in Maddock, L., Bone, Q., and Rayner, J. M. V. (eds.), Mechanisms and Physiology of Animal Swimming. New York: Cambridge University Press, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thagard, P. 1991. “The dinosaur debate: explanatory coherence and the problem of competing hypotheses,” in Pollock, J. and Cummins, R., (eds.), Philosophy and AI: essays at the interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 279–300.Google Scholar

Thagard, P. 1992. Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Thagard, P. 2000. Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Thagard, P. and Verbeurgt, K. 1998. “Coherence and constraint satisfaction,” Cognitive Science 22: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thulborn, R. A. 1989. “The gaits of dinosaurs,” in Gillette, D. D. and Lockley, M. G. (eds.), Dinosaur tracks and traces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–50.Google Scholar

Thulborn, R. A. 1990, Dinosaur tracks. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tucker, A. 1998. “Unique events: the underdetermination of explanation,” Erkenntnis 48 (1): 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tucker, A. 2004. Our knowledge of the past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, D. 2000. “The functions of fossils: Inference and explanation in functional morphology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science 31: 137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, D. 2004. “The past vs. the tiny: Historical science and the abductive arguments for realism,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, D. 2005a. “Local underdetermination in historical science,” Philosophy of Science 72: 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, D. 2005b. “Misleading observable analogues in paleontology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36: 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraassen, B. C. 1980. The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Fraassen, B. C. 1983. “Glymour on evidence and explanation,” in Earman, J. (ed.), Testing scientific theories: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol. 10. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 165–176.Google Scholar

van Fraassen, B. C. 1985. “Empiricism in philosophy of science,” in Churchland, P. M. and Hooker, C. A., (eds.), Images of science: Essays on realism and empiricism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 245–308.Google Scholar

Fraassen, B. C. 1989. Laws and symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraassen, B. C. 2002. The empirical stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Weishampel, D. B. 1981. “Acoustic analysis of potential vocalization in lambeosaurine dinosaurs,” Paleobiology 7: 252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weishampel, D. B. 1997. “Dinosaurian cacophony: Inferring function in extinct organisms,” Bioscience 47: 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whiteaves, J. 1892. “Description of a new genus of phyllocarid Crustacea from the Middle Cambrian of Mount Stephen, BC,” Canadian Record of Science 5: 205–208.Google Scholar

Whittington, H. B. and Briggs, D. E. G. 1985. “The largest Cambrian animal, Anomalocaris, Burgess Shale, British Columbia,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B309: 569–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, J. A. and Carrano, M. T. 1999. “Titanosaurs and the origin of “wide-gauge’ trackways: a biomechanical and systematic perspective on sauropod locomotion,” Paleobiology 25 (2), 252–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1969. On Certainty. New York: Harper and Rowe.Google Scholar

Wylie, A. 1995. “Unification and convergence in archaeological explanation: the agricultural ‘wave of advance’ and the origins of Indo-European languages,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (supp): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wylie, A. 2002. Thinking from things: Essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Zack, N. 2002. Philosophy of science and race. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Acock, M. 1983. “The age of the universe,” Philosophy of Science 50 (1): 130–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, R. M. 1976. “Estimates of speeds of dinosaurs,” Nature 261: 129–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, C., Bekoff, M. and Lauder, G. (eds.) 1998. Nature's purposes: analyses of function and design in biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Alvarez, W. et al. 1980. “Extraterrestrial cause for the cretaceous-tertiary extinction,” Science 208: 1095–1108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anfinrude, P. and Schotte, F. 2005. “X-ray fingerprinting of chemical intermediates in solution,” Science 309 (5738): 1192–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, R. T. 1986. The dinosaur heresies. New York: Kensington Publishing.Google Scholar

Barlow, C. 2000. The ghosts of evolution: Nonsensical fruit, missing partners, and other ecological anachronisms. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bell, G. L., Jr. 1997. “Introduction [to the Mosasauridae],” in Callaway, J. M. and Nicholls, E. L. (eds.), Ancient marine reptiles. New York: Academic Press, 281–292.Google Scholar

Ben-Menahem, Y. 1997. “Historical contingency,” Ratio 10 (2): 991–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benton, M. J. 1995. “Diversification and extinction in the history of life,” Science 268 (5207): 52–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benton, M. J. 1997. “Models for the diversification of life,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12 (12): 490–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benton, M. J. 1999. “The history of life: Large databases in palaeontology,” in Harper, D. A. T. (ed.), Numerical palaeobiology: Computer-based modeling and analysis of fossils and their distribution. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 249–283.Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. 2002. “Realism: Deconstructing the debate,” Ratio 15 (2): 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, S. 2005. Truth: A guide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. 1985. “Lex orandi est lex credendi,” in Churchland, P. M. and Hooker, C. A. (eds.), Images of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–34.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. 1984. “The current status of scientific realism,” in Leplin, J. (ed.), Scientific realism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 41–82.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. 1990. “Realism, approximate truth, and method,” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14: 355–391.Google Scholar

Buller, D. (ed.) 1999. Function, selection, and design. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Carman, C. 2005. “The electrons of the dinosaurs and the center of the earth,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36 (1): 171–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cleal, C. J., and Thomas, B. A. 1999. Plant fossils: The history of land vegetation. Rochester, NY: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar

Cleland, C. 2002. “Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science,” Philosophy of Science 69 (3): 474–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coles, J. 1973. Archaeology by experiment. London: Hutchinson and Company.Google Scholar

Collins, D. 1996. “The ‘evolution’ of Anomalocaris and its classification in the Arthropod class Dinocarida and order Radiodonta,” Journal of Paleontology 70: 280–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuddington, K., and M. Ruse 2004. “Biodiversity, Darwin, and the fossil record,” in Oksanen, M. and Pietarinen, J. (eds.), Philosophy and biodiversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devitt, M. 1991. Realism and truth, second edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Donnadieu, Y., Fluteau, F., Ramstein, G., et al. 2003. “Is there a conflict between the Neoproterozoic glacial deposits and the snowball Earth interpretation: an improved understanding with numerical modeling,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters 208: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dummett, M. 1979. “The reality of the past,” in Truth and other enigmas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 358–374.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 2003. “Truth and the past,” Journal of Philosophy, 100: 5–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, D. A. D. 2000. “Stratigraphic, geochronological, and paleomagnetic constraints upon the neoproterozoic climate paradox,” American Journal of Science 300: 347–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farlow, J. O. 1992. “Sauropod tracks and trackmakers: integrating the ichnological and skeletal records,” Zubia 10: 89–138.Google Scholar

Farlow, J. O. and M. G. Lockley 1989. “Roland T. Bird, dinosaur tracker: An appreciation,” in Gillette, D. D. and Lockley, M. G. (eds.), Dinosaur tracks and traces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–36.Google Scholar

Feinberg, G., Lavine, S., and Albert, D. 1992. “Knowledge of the past and the future,” The Journal of Philosophy 89: 607–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, A. 1984. “The natural ontological attitude,” in Leplin, J. (ed.), Scientific realism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 83–107.Google Scholar

Fine, A. 1986. “Unnatural attitudes: Realist and instrumentalist attachments to science,” Mind 95: 149–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

fine, A. 1996. The shaky game: Einstein, realism, and the quantum theory, second edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, P. E. et al. 2000. “Cardiovascular evidence for an intermediate or higher metabolic rate in an ornithiscian dinosaur,” Science 288: 503–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friedman, M. 1974. “Explanation and scientific understanding,” Journal of Philosophy, 71: 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallie, W. B. 1959. “Explanations in history and the genetic sciences,” in Gardiner, P. (ed.), Theories of history. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Gero, J. M. 1989. “Producing prehistory, controlling the past: the case of New England beehives,” in Pinsky, V. and Wylie, A. (eds.), Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: Essays in the philosophy, history, and socio-politics of archaeology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 96–103.Google Scholar

Gottelli, D., Silleri-Zubiri, C., Appelbaum, G. D. et al. 1994. “Molecular genetics of the most endangered canid: the Ethiopian Wolf, Canis simensis,” Molecular Ecology 3: 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1980. “The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary discipline,” Paleobiology 6 (1): 96–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1987. Time's arrow, time's cycle: Myth and metaphor in the discovery of geological time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1989. Wonderful life: The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1991. Bully for Brontosaurus. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. 1979. “The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B205: 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grantham, T. 1999. “Explanatory pluralism in paleobiology,” Philosophy of Science 66 (supp.): S223-S236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, B. 1999. The elegant universe: Superstrings, hidden dimensions and the quest for the ultimate theory. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, I. 1999. The social construction of what?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hanen, M. and J. Kelley 1989. “Inference to the best explanation in archaeology,” in Pinsky, V. and Wylie, A. (eds.), Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: Essays in the philosophy, history, and socio-politics of archaeology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 14–17.Google Scholar

Harré, R. 1986. Varieties of realism: A rationale for the natural sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harré, R. 1996. “From observability to manipulability: Extending the inductive arguments for realism,” Synthese 108 (2): 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hempel, C. G. 1965. Aspects of scientific explanation, and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Hempel, C. G. 1966. Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, E. 1858/1974. A Report on the sandstone of the Connecticut valley, especially its fossil footmarks. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar

Hoffman, P. F., Kaufman, A. J., Halverson, G. P., and Schrag, D. P.. 1998. “A neoproterozoic snowball Earth,” Science 281 (5381): 1342–1346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoffman, P. F. and Schrag, D. P. 2000. “Snowball Earth,” Scientific American 282 (1): 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopson, J. A. 1975. “The evolution of cranial display structures in hadrosaurine dinosaurs,” Paleobiology 1: 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horwich, P. 1982. Probability and evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horwich, P. 1987. Asymmetries in time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Horwich, P. 1991. “On the nature and norms of theoretical commitment,” Philosophy of Science 38 (51): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, N. 1999. “Statistical and imaging methods applied to deformed fossils,” in Harper, D. A. T., (ed.), Numerical paleobiology: Computer-based modeling and analysis of fossils and their distributions. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 126–155.Google Scholar

Hull, D. L. 1975. “Central subjects and historical narratives,” History and Theory 14: 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huss, J. E. 2004. “Experimental reasoning in non-experimental science: Case studies from paleobiology,” unpublished PhD thesis, University of Chicago. UMI number 3125619.

Hyde, W. T., Crowley, T. J., Baum, S. K., and Peltier, W. R. 2000. “Neoproterozoic ‘snowball Earth’ simulations with a coupled climate/ice sheet model,” Nature 405 (6785): 425–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jacobsen, S. B. 2001. “Gas hydrates and deglaciations,” Nature 412 (6848): 691–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jaffe, M. 2000. The gilded dinosaur. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar

Janzen, D. H. and Martin, P. S. 1982. “Neotropical anachronisms: The fruits the Gomphotheres ate,” Science 215: 19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jenkins, G. S. 2000. “The ‘Snowball Earth’ and Precambrian climate,” Science 288: 975–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judson, O. 2006. “Affairs to remember,” The New York Times (May 28), section 4, p. 10.Google Scholar

Kasting, and Caldeira, 1992. “Susceptibility of the early earth to irreversible glaciation caused by carbon-dioxide clouds,” Nature 359: 226–228.Google Scholar

Kemp, T. S. 1999. Fossils and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kennedy, M. J., Christie-Blick, N., and Sohl, L. E. 2001. “Are proterozoic cap carbonates and isotopic excursions a record of gas hydrate destabilization following Earth's coldest intervals?,” Geology 29 (5): 446–446.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerr, R. 2000. “An appealing snowball Earth that's still hard to swallow,” Science 287 (5459): 1734–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkham, R. L. 1992. Theories of truth: A critical introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kirschvink, J. L. 1992. “Late proterozoic low-latitude global glaciation: The snowball Earth,” in Schopf, J. W. and Klein, C. (eds.), The proterozoic biosphere: A multidisciplinary approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirschvink, J. L., Gaidos, E. J., Bertani, L. E. et al. 2000. “Paleoproterozoic snowball Earth: Extreme climatic and geochemical global change and its biological consequences,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97 (4): 1400–1405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kitcher, P. 1989. “Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world,” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 13: 410–450.Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. 1993. The advancement of science: science without legend, objectivity without illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kleinhans, M. G., Buskes, C. J. J., and , H. W. Regt 2005. “Terra Incognita: Explanation and reduction in earth science,” International Studies in Philosophy of Science 19 (3): 289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kosso, P. 2001. Knowing the past: Philosophical issues of history and archaeology. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kukla, A. 1994. “Non-empirical theoretical virtues and the argument from underdetermination,” Erkenntnis 41: 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kukla, A. 1996. “Does every theory have empirically equivalent rivals?,” Erkenntnis 44: 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kukla, A. 2000. Social constructivism and the philosophy of science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ladyman, J. 1999. “Review of Jarrett Leplin, A novel defense of scientific realism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50: 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, L. 1971. “William Whewell on the consilience of inductions,” Monist 55: 368–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, L. 1981/1996. “A confutation of convergent realism,” in Papineau, D. (ed.), The philosophy of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–138.Google Scholar

Laudan, L. and Leplin, J. 1991. “Empirical equivalence and underdetermination,” Journal of Philosophy 88: 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Leather, J., Allen, P. A., Brasier, M. D., and Cozzi, A. 2002. “Neoproterozoic snowball Earth under scrutiny: Evidence from the Fiq glaciation of Oman,” Geology 30 (10): 891–894.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leplin, J. 1997. A novel defense of scientific realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1979. “Counterfactual dependence and time's arrow,” Nous 13: 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipton, P. 1991. Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lipton, P. 1993. “Is the best good enough?,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93: 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lockley, M. G. et al. 1994. “The distribution of sauropod tracks and trackmakers,” Gaia 10: 233–248.Google Scholar

Lynch, M. P. 2004. True to life: Why truth matters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

McGrew, T. 2003. “Confirmation, heuristics, and explanatory reasoning,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKay, C. P. 2000. “Thickness of tropical ice and photosynthesis on a snowball Earth,” Geophysical Research Letters 27 (14): 2153–2156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McMullin, E. 1984. “A case for scientific realism,” in Leplin, J. (ed.), Scientific realism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 8–40.Google Scholar

Martin, L. D. and Rothschild, B. M. 1987. “Avascular necrosis: Occurrence in diving cretaceous mosasaurs,” Science 236: 75–77.Google Scholar

Martin, L. D. and Rothschild, B. M. 1989. “Paleopathology and diving mosasaurs,” American Scientist 77: 460–466.Google Scholar

Massare, J. 1988. “Swimming capabilities of Mesozoic marine reptiles: implications for method of predation,” Paleobiology 14 (2): 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maxwell, G. l962/1999. “The ontological status of theoretical entities,” in Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in The Philosophy of Science, vol. Ⅲ.Google Scholar

Mayo, D. 1991. “Novel evidence and severe tests,” Philosophy of Science 58: 523–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayo, D. 1997. “Severe tests, arguing from error, and methodological underdetermination,” Philosophical Studies 86: 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melnyk, A. 1997. “How to keep the “physical’ in physicalism,” Journal of Philosophy 94 (12): 622–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millgram, E. 2000. “Coherence: The price of the ticket,” Journal of Philosophy 97 (2): 82–93.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. 1998. The last dinosaur book: The life and times of a cultural icon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Musgrave, A. 1989. “NOA's Ark – fine for realism,” Philosophical Quarterly 39: 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Musgrave, A. 1999. “Idealism and antirealism,” in Klee, R. (ed.), Scientific inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 344–352.Google Scholar

Nagel, E. 1979. The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publications.Google Scholar

Newton-Smith, W. H. 1987. “Realism and inference to the best explanation,” Fundamenta Scientiae 7: 305–316.Google Scholar

Nojima, S., Schal, C., Webster, F. X. et al. 2005. “Identification of the sex pheromone of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica,” Science 307 (5712): 1104–1106.Google ScholarPubMed

Nola, R. 2002. “Realism through manipulation, and by hypothesis,” in Clarke, S. and Lyons, T. D. (eds.), Recent themes in the philosophy of science: scientific realism and commonsense. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noonan, J. P., Hofreiter, M., Smith, D. et al. 2005. “Genomic sequencing of pleistocene cave bears,” Science 309 (5734): 597–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Norman, D. 1988. The prehistoric world of the dinosaur. New York: Gallery Books.Google Scholar

Padian, K. and Olsen, P. E. 1984. “The track of Pteraichnus: not Pterosaurian, but Crocodilian,” Journal of Paleontology 58: 178–184.Google Scholar

Padian, K. and P. E. Olsen 1989. “Ratite footprints and the stance and gait of mesozoic therapods,” in Gillette, D. D. and Lockley, M. (eds.), Dinosaur tracks and traces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231–242.Google Scholar

Parsons, K. M. 2001. Drawing out leviathan: dinosaurs and the science wars. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Patterson, C. and Smith, A. B. 1987. “Is periodicity of mass extinctions a taxonomic artifact?,” Nature 330: 248–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, C. and Smith, A. B. 1989. “Periodocity in extinction: the role of systematics,” Ecology 70: 802–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, N., Richter, D. J., Gnerre, S. et al. 2006. “Genetic evidence for complex speciation of humans and chimpanzees,” Nature (advance online publication 17 May). Available online at www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/pdf/nature04789.pdf. Last accessed June 4, 2006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Post, J. F. 1987. The faces of existence: An essay in nonreductive metaphysics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Post, J. F. 1996. “The foundationalism in irrealism, and the immorality,” Journal of Philosophical Research, 21, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific realism: How science tracks truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. 1978. Meaning and the moral sciences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. 1981. Reason, truth, and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, H. 1984. “What is realism?,” in Leplin, J. (ed.), Scientific realism. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 140–153.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. 1975. “On empirically equivalent systems of the world,” Erkenntnis 9: 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raup, D. M., Gould, S. J., Schopf, T. J. M., and Simberloff, D. S. 1973. “Stochastic models of phylogeny and the evolution of diversity,” Journal of Geology 81: 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raup, D. M. and Gould, S. J. 1974. “Stochastic simulation and evolution of morphology – Towards a nomothetic paleobiology,” Systematic Zoology 23 (2): 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raup, D. M. and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. “Periodicity of extinctions in the geologic past,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 81: 801–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Raup, D. M. and Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1986. “Periodic extinctions of families and genera,” Science 231: 833–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, A. 1996. “A field guide to recent species of naturalism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouse, J. 1996. Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Rowe, T., McBride, E. F., and Sereno, P. C. 2001. “Dinosaur with a heart of stone,” Science 291: 783a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Runnegar, B. 2000. “Loophole for snowball Earth,” Nature 405 (6785): 403–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ruse, M. 1999. Mystery of mysteries: Is evolution a social construction?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1921. The analysis of mind. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Salmon, M. H. 1982. Philosophy and archaeology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sato, T., Cheng, Y., Wu, X. et al. 2005. “A pair of shelled eggs inside a female dinosaur,” Science 308 (5720): 375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Savitt, S. F., 1990. “Epistemological time asymmetry,” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1: 317–324.Google Scholar

Schweitzer, M. H., Wittmeyer, J. L., Horner, J. R., and Toporski, J. K. 2005. “Soft-tissue vessels and cellular preservation in Tyrannosaurus rex,” Science 307 (5717):1952–1955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1978. “A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. I. Analysis of marine orders,” Paleobiology 4: 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1979. “A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. Ⅱ. Early Paleozoic families and multiple equilibria,” Paleobiology 5: 222–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1982. A compendium of fossil marine families. Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology 51.Google Scholar

Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. “A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. Ⅲ. Post-paleozoic families and mass extinctions,” Paleobiology 10: 246–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. and Kendrick, D. C. 1993. “Numerical experiments with model monophyletic and paraphyletic taxa,” Paleobiology 19: 168–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sheldon, A. 1997. “Ecological implications of mosasaur bone microstructure,” in Callaway, J. M. and Nicholls, E. L., (eds.), Ancient Marine Reptiles. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Smart, J. J. C. 1963. Philosophy and scientific realism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sober, E. 1988. Reconstructing the past: Parsimony, evolution, and inference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stanford, P. K. 2000. “An antirealist explanation of the success of science,” Philosophy of Science 67 (2): 266–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanford, P. K. 2001. “Refusing the Devil's bargain: What kind of underdetermination should we take seriously?,” Philosophy of Science 68(Supplement): S1-S12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinbok, R. T. 1989. “Ichnology of the Connecticut Valley: A vignette of American science in the early nineteenth century,” in Gillette, D. D. and Lockley, M. G. (eds.), Dinosaur tracks and traces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–32.Google Scholar

Taylor, M. A. 1994. “Stone, bone, and blubber? Buoyancy control strategies in aquatic tetrapods,” in Maddock, L., Bone, Q., and Rayner, J. M. V. (eds.), Mechanisms and Physiology of Animal Swimming. New York: Cambridge University Press, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thagard, P. 1991. “The dinosaur debate: explanatory coherence and the problem of competing hypotheses,” in Pollock, J. and Cummins, R., (eds.), Philosophy and AI: essays at the interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 279–300.Google Scholar

Thagard, P. 1992. Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Thagard, P. 2000. Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Thagard, P. and Verbeurgt, K. 1998. “Coherence and constraint satisfaction,” Cognitive Science 22: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thulborn, R. A. 1989. “The gaits of dinosaurs,” in Gillette, D. D. and Lockley, M. G. (eds.), Dinosaur tracks and traces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–50.Google Scholar

Thulborn, R. A. 1990, Dinosaur tracks. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tucker, A. 1998. “Unique events: the underdetermination of explanation,” Erkenntnis 48 (1): 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tucker, A. 2004. Our knowledge of the past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, D. 2000. “The functions of fossils: Inference and explanation in functional morphology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science 31: 137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, D. 2004. “The past vs. the tiny: Historical science and the abductive arguments for realism,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, D. 2005a. “Local underdetermination in historical science,” Philosophy of Science 72: 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, D. 2005b. “Misleading observable analogues in paleontology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36: 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraassen, B. C. 1980. The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Fraassen, B. C. 1983. “Glymour on evidence and explanation,” in Earman, J. (ed.), Testing scientific theories: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol. 10. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 165–176.Google Scholar

van Fraassen, B. C. 1985. “Empiricism in philosophy of science,” in Churchland, P. M. and Hooker, C. A., (eds.), Images of science: Essays on realism and empiricism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 245–308.Google Scholar

Fraassen, B. C. 1989. Laws and symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraassen, B. C. 2002. The empirical stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Weishampel, D. B. 1981. “Acoustic analysis of potential vocalization in lambeosaurine dinosaurs,” Paleobiology 7: 252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weishampel, D. B. 1997. “Dinosaurian cacophony: Inferring function in extinct organisms,” Bioscience 47: 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whiteaves, J. 1892. “Description of a new genus of phyllocarid Crustacea from the Middle Cambrian of Mount Stephen, BC,” Canadian Record of Science 5: 205–208.Google Scholar

Whittington, H. B. and Briggs, D. E. G. 1985. “The largest Cambrian animal, Anomalocaris, Burgess Shale, British Columbia,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B309: 569–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, J. A. and Carrano, M. T. 1999. “Titanosaurs and the origin of “wide-gauge’ trackways: a biomechanical and systematic perspective on sauropod locomotion,” Paleobiology 25 (2), 252–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1969. On Certainty. New York: Harper and Rowe.Google Scholar

Wylie, A. 1995. “Unification and convergence in archaeological explanation: the agricultural ‘wave of advance’ and the origins of Indo-European languages,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (supp): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wylie, A. 2002. Thinking from things: Essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Zack, N. 2002. Philosophy of science and race. London: Routledge.Google Scholar