Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T17:04:52.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - The Laboratory’s Role in Embryo Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2023

Catherine Racowsky
Affiliation:
Hôpital Foch, France
Jacques Cohen
Affiliation:
IVF 2.0, New York
Nicholas Macklon
Affiliation:
London Women's Clinic
Get access

Summary

The laboratory plays a key role in an embryo’s development and therefore is a critical element of embryology key performance indicators (KPIs) (1). The primary goal of the IVF laboratory is to provide an optimal environment for successful embryo development, mimicking an optimal in vivo environment. When the laboratory environment, culture conditions and embryology handling are optimised, the collective environment yields embryology KPIs that translate into maximal fertilised embryos, high-quality blastocysts and ultimately healthy live births. Ongoing and rigorous quality control within the embryology laboratory ensures that each patient’s cohort of embryos have the appropriate environment to reach developmental milestones, with the goal of ensuring safety and quality of care. This chapter describes the laboratory’s role in embryo development and embryo selection, including the embryology KPI frameworks and quality control pathways utilised by the laboratory

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cohen, J, Consensus Group C. ‘There is only one thing that is truly important in an IVF laboratory: everything’ – Cairo Consensus guidelines on IVF culture conditions. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40:3360.Google Scholar
Swain, JE. Optimal human embryo culture. Semin Reprod Med 2015;33:103–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Wale, P, Gardner, D. The effects of chemical and physical factors on mammalian embryo culture and their importance for the practice of assisted human reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:222.Google Scholar
Morbeck, DE, Baumann, NA, Oglesbee, D. Composition of single-step media used for human embryo culture. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1055–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarahomi, M, Vaz, FM, van Straalen, JP, et al. The composition of human preimplantation embryo culture media and their stability during storage and culture. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1450–61.Google Scholar
Mortimer, D, Cohen, J, Mortimer, ST, et al. Cairo consensus on the IVF laboratory environment and air quality: report of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online 2018;36:658–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortimer, ST, Mortimer, D. Quality and risk management in the IVF laboratory. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2015.Google Scholar
ESHRE Guideline Group on Good Practice in IVF Labs, De los Santos, MJ, Apter, S, et al. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015). Hum Reprod. 2016;31:685–6.Google Scholar
ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology, Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of art laboratory performance indicators. Hum Reprod Open. 2017;35:494510.Google Scholar
Rubino, P, Vigano, P, Luddi, A, Piomboni, P. The ICSI procedure from past to future: a systematic review of the more controversial aspects. Hum Reprod Update 2016;22:194227.Google Scholar
Wolff, HS, Fredrickson, JR, Walker, DL, Morbeck, DE. Advances in quality control: mouse embryo morphokinetics are sensitive markers of in vitro stress. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1776–82.Google Scholar
Hammond, ER, Morbeck, DE. Tracking quality: can embryology key performance indicators be used to identify clinically relevant shifts in pregnancy rate? Hum Reprod. 2019;34:3743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaegter, KK, Lakic, TG, Olovsson, M, Berglund, L, Brodin, T, Holte, J. Which factors are most predictive for live birth after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments? Analysis of 100 prospectively recorded variables in 8,400 IVF/ICSI single-embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:641–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×