Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:10:36.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

92 - Radical hysterectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

Jack Basil
Affiliation:
Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
Michael F. Lubin
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Robert B. Smith
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Thomas F. Dodson
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Nathan O. Spell
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
H. Kenneth Walker
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Carcinoma of the uterine cervix is the third most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, with an estimated 12 200 newly diagnosed cases and 4100 deaths in 2003. With the adoption of routine screening programs, the mortality from the condition has steadily decreased since the 1940s in this country, though the disease remains a significant problem in developing countries.

The disease is typically clinically staged, and all stages may be treated with radiotherapy or a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Traditionally, surgical treatment has been used in early stage disease. Microinvasive disease or stage IA1 can be adequately treated with a vaginal or simple abdominal hysterectomy. Radical hysterectomy, usually referred to as a type III hysterectomy, is a treatment modality utilized to treat early stage invasive carcinoma of the cervix (stages IA2 thru IIA). In addition to the radical hysterectomy, a pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy is also performed as a component of this treatment. Wertheim and Meigs described variations of the radical hysterectomy that are most often employed today.

Whether patients are treated with radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy versus radiotherapy, treatment outcomes for early stage cervical cancer are similar. Patients undergoing surgery must consider the following operative risks: blood transfusion, perioperative infection, thromboemobolic disorders, postoperative bladder and bowel dysfunction, fistula formation, nerve injury, and lymphedema.

Despite the risks, there are certain potential advantages to radical hysterectomy over primary radiotherapy. For premenopausal women, radical hysterectomy affords the opportunity for ovarian preservation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Medical Management of the Surgical Patient
A Textbook of Perioperative Medicine
, pp. 660 - 662
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Artman, L. E., Hoskins, W. J., Bibro, M. C.et al. Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB carcinoma of the cervix: 21 years experience. Gynecol. Oncol. 1987; 28: 8–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Covens, A., Rosen, B., Gibbons, A.et al. Differences in the morbidity of radical hysterectomy between gynecological oncologists. Gynecol. Oncol. 1993; 51: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jemel, A., Murray, T., Samuels, A.et al. Cancer Statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2003; 53: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levrant, S. G., Fruchter, R. G., & Maiman, M.Radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: morbidity and survival in relation to weight and age. Gynecol. Oncol. 1992; 45: 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meigs, J. V.The Wertheim operation for carcinoma of the cervix. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1945; 49: 542–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piver, M. S., Rutledge, F., & Smith, J. P.Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet. Gynecol. 1974; 44: 265–272.Google ScholarPubMed
Shuster, P. A., Barter, J. F., Potkul, R. K.et al. Radical hysterectomy morbidity in relation to age. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991; 78: 77–79.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. J., Bonnar, J., & Wright, F. W.A study of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis after major gynaceological surgery using labeled fibrinogen-phlebography and lung scanning. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Commun. 1974; 81: 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheim, E.The extended abdominal operation for carcinoma uteri (based on 500 operative cases). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1912; 66: 169–232.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×