Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:05:52.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Notebooks as windows on learning: The case of a science-into-ESL program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Rochel Gelman
Affiliation:
Psychology and Cognitive Science, Rutgers University
Laura Romo
Affiliation:
University of California Los Angeles
Wendy S. Francis
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at El Paso
Nira Granott
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Dallas
Jim Parziale
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Boston
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Our efforts to study the acquisition of new knowledge, especially in the areas of mathematics and science, take advantage of a combination of methods. These include experiments, controlled training studies, and qualitative analyses of videotaped classroom learning. In addition, we have been developing ways to treat the classroom as an in situ learning laboratory. Here we focus on a particular example, a science-into-ESL (English as a Second Language) classroom that functioned as a concept and language learning laboratory.

A key research goal was to gather “on-line” data on whether students moved on to and along relevant learning paths during the course of a semester. Given the classroom setting, we wanted these to be inconspicuous “probes” rather than more traditional learning test trials. Our solution shares important aspects of the microgenetic method, the topic of this book. We requested that students keep notebooks and make regular entries that could function as learning experiences for them and probes as to whether learning was happening over time. Notebook entries are a common feature of how scientists work, especially when it comes to trying to keep track of experiments and evolving ideas. They also have served historians of science as documents for analyzing the conditions of conceptual change. As we shall see, notebooks have the potential to serve researchers' efforts to obtain on-line information about students' progress in a non-intrusive manner.

Type
Chapter
Information
Microdevelopment
Transition Processes in Development and Learning
, pp. 269 - 293
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. C., & Shifrin, Z. (1980). The meaning of words in context. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer, (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Bartlett, F. (1932). Thinking: An experimental and social study. New York: Basic Books
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1989). Expository text for young readers: The issue of coherence. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 47–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences
Brown, A. L. (1990). Domain-specific principles affect learning and transfer in children. Cognitive Science, 14, 107–133Google Scholar
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Contributions of instructional innovation to understanding theory (pp. 229–270). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Carey, S. (1988). Why John and Jane aren’t learning science. In Science and public policy seminars. Federation of Behavioral, Psychological, and Cognitive Sciences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Carey, S. (1991). Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), Epigenesis of mind: Studies in biology and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1983). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course. Rowley, MA: Newbury House
Chi, M. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.) (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Dooling, D. J., & Lachman, R. (1971). Effects of comprehension on retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, W. S. (1999). Analogical transfer across languages in English–Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 301–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, W. S., Romo, L., & Gelman, R. (in press). Syntactic structure, grammatical accuracy, and content in second-language writing: An analysis of skill learning and on-line processing. In R. R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing. n.p.: Elsevier
Gelman, R. (1991). Epigenetic foundations of knowledge structures: Initial and transcendent constructions. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), Epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 293–322). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Gelman, R. (1993). A rational-constructivist account of early learning about numbers and objects. In D. Medin (Ed.), Learning and motivation, Vol. 30 (pp. 61–96). New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Gelman, R. (1994). Constructivism and supporting environments. In D. Tirosh (Ed.), Implicit and explicit knowledge: An educational approach (pp. 55–82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Gelman, R., & Gattis, M. Lee (1995). Trends in educational psychology in the United Statess. Recent trends and developments in educational psychology: Chinese and American perspectives. Paris, France: UNESCO
Gelman, R., Meck, G., Romo, L., Meck, B., Francis, W., & Fritz, C. O. (1995). Integrating science concepts into intermediate English as a second language (ESL) instruction. In R. F. Macías & R. G. García-Ramos (Eds.), Changing schools for changing students: An anthology of research on language minorities, schools, and society (pp. 181–203). Santa Barbara, CA: UC Linguistic Minority Research Institute
Gelman, R., & Williams, E. (1998). Enabling constraints for cognitive development and learning: Domain specificity and epigenesis. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), & D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 2: Cognition, perception, and language (5th edn., pp. 575–630). New York: Wiley
Glynn, S. M., Yeany, R. H., & Britton, B. K. (1991). A constructive view of learning science. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 3–19). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (this volume). Looking at the hands through time: A microgenetic perspective on learning and instruction
Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. Breckinridge (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100, 279–297CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granott, N. (this volume). How microdevelopment creates macrodevelopment: Reiterated sequences, backward transitions, and the Zone of Current Development
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
Hartnett, P. M., & Gelman, R. (1998). Early understandings of number: paths or barriers to the construction of new understandings?Learning and Instruction: The Journal of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, 8, 341–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Inhelder, B. (1974/75). If you want to get ahead, get a theory. Cognition, 3, 195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, D. (this volume). A multi-component system that constructs knowledge: Insights from microgenetic study
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific resolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Meck, G. H., & Gelman, R. (1992). Interrelated science concepts in English as a Second Language: A science content text for intermediate level ESL instruction. Draft, Department of Psychology, UCLA
Osborne, R. J., & Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children's conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 825–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parziale, J. (this volume). Observing the dynamics of construction: Children building bridges and new ideas
Romo, L. F. (1993). Science concept development and language proficiency in ESL instruction. Unpublished master's thesis. University of California, Los Angeles
Siegler, R. S. (this volume). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation
Siegler, R. S., & Jenkins, E. (1989). How children discover new strategies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Joram, E. (1995). Assessing students’ misclassifications of physics concepts: An ontological basis for conceptual change. Cognition & Instruction, 13, 373–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State of California (1990). California State Board of Education Science Framework. Sacramento, CA: California Publication
Stepans, J. I., Dyche, S., & Beiswenger, R. (1988). The effect of two instructional models in bringing about a conceptual change in the understanding of science concepts by prospective elementary teachers. Science Education, 72, 185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, J. W., & Fernandez, C. (1995). Learning mathematics from classroom instruction: Cross-cultural and experimental perspectives. In C. A. Nelson (Ed.), Basic and applied perspectives on learning, cognition, and development. The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, Vol. 28 (pp. 103–130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: Simon & Schuster

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×