Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T10:12:31.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Sex is not on discount: mating market and lemurs

from Part III - Why lemurs keep in touch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Ivan Norscia  and
Elisabetta Palagi
Foreword by
Alison Jolly  and
Ian Tatterall
Afterword by
Michael Huffman
Ivan Norscia
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi, Pisa
Elisabetta Palagi
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi, Pisa
Get access

Summary

If we understand particular exchanges as being the result of a particular social system…it may become clear why exchange is a powerful metaphor for social relationships and their transformation.

Sitta von Reden, 1998

Biological (or pseudo-cultural?) market

It is well known that both Darwin and Wallace were influenced by the work of the economist and demographist Thomas Malthus (An Essay on the Principle of Population, published in 1797) while elaborating their theories on evolution. Probably, the mechanisms underlying the economic system are the outcome of an evolutionary process, which has acted on the biological system and reflects on our behaviour. The analogy between economical and biological systems is not limited to this example. In biology, as well as in economics and politics, power is a key concept for understanding asymmetric relationships between subjects (Dahl, 1957). Distributive power, derived from Russell's definition of social power (1938), focuses upon who has got the power over whom. It can originate from coercion, when an individual can force another to do something, or from leverage, when the use of force is not possible. Specifically, coercive power depends on fear, suppression of free choice and/or use of threat, for its existence. It is normally based on an imbalance of social, psychological and physical power between individuals. Examples of this kind of power are theft with violence to obtain valuable goods (Matsueda et al., 2006), bullying to aggressively impose domination over others (Rayner and Hoel, 1997) and rape (Thornhill and Thornhill, 1983; Emery-Thompson, 2009; Muller and Wrangham, 2009). Human, gorilla, chimpanzee and orangutan males perform sexual coercion over females to obtain forced copulations (Goetz and Shackelford, 2006; Muller and Wrangham, 2009). Wild orangutans provide one of the most dramatic examples of this phenomenon. It has been reported that in this species ‘most copulations by subadult males and nearly half of all copulations by adult males occur after the female's fierce resistance has been overcome through violent restraint’ (Smuts and Smuts, 1993, p. 6). Sexual coercion is also present in many other animals spanning invertebrates and mammals. It is worth mentioning, among others, that scorpion flies (Thornhill, 1980), guppies (Head and Brooks, 2006), salamanders (Ethan et al., 2006), snakes (Shine and Mason, 2005), mallards (Barash, 1977), bottlenose dolphins (Scott et al., 2005), and a huge variety of non-human primates (Smuts and Smuts, 1993) force their mates into sex.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Missing Lemur Link
An Ancestral Step in the Evolution of Human Behaviour
 , pp. 219 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albo, M. J., Bilde, T. & Uhl, G. (2013). Sperm storage mediated by cryptic female choice for nuptial gifts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 280(1772), 20131735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allesina, S. (2011). Measuring nepotism through shared last names: the case of Italian academia. PLoS ONE, 6, e21160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour, 48, 227–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonacci, D., Norscia, I. & Palagi, E. (2010). Stranger to familiar: wild strepsirrhines manage xenophobia by playing. PLos ONE, 5(10), e13218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aureli, F., van Schaik, C. P. & van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1989). Functional aspects of reconciliation among captive long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). American Journal of Primatology, 19, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balasubramaniam, K. N., Berman, C. M., Ogawa, H. & Li, J. (2011). Using biological markets principles to examine patterns of grooming exchange in Macaca thibetana. American Journal of Primatology, 73(12), 1269–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barash, D. P. (1977). Sociobiology of rape in mallards (Anas platyrhynchos): response of the mated male. Science, 197, 788–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barelli, C., Reichard, U. H. & Mundry, R. (2011). Is grooming used as a commodity in wild white-handed gibbons, Hylobates lar?Animal Behaviour, 82, 801–809.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. & Henzi, S. P. (2001). The utility of grooming in baboon troops. In: Noë, R., van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. & Hammerstein, P. (eds), Economics in Nature. Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–145.CrossRef
Barrett, L., Henzi, S. P., Weingrill, A., Lycett, J. E. & Hill, R. A. (1999). Market forces predict grooming reciprocity among female baboons. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266(1420), 665–670.Google Scholar
Barske, J., Fusani, L., Wikelski, M., et al. (2014). Energetics of the acrobatic courtship in male golden-collared manakins (Manacus vitellinus). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1776), 20132482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, I. S. (1981). Dominance: the baby and the bathwater. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaustein, A. R. (1981). Sexual selection and mammalian olfaction. American Naturalist, 117, 1006–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockman, D. K. (1999). Reproductive behavior of female Propithecus verreauxi at Beza Mahafaly, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 20, 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosnan, S. F. & de Waal, F. B. (2002). A proximate perspective on reciprocal altruism. Human Nature, 13(1), 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chancellor, R. L. & Isbell, L. A. (2009). Female grooming markets in a population of gray-cheeked mangabeys (Lophocebus albigena). Behavioral Ecology, 20, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, P. M. R., Halliday, J. E. B., Barrett, L. & Henzi, S. P. (2010). Chacma baboon mating markets: competitor suppression mediates the potential for intersexual exchange. Behavioral Ecology, 21(6), 1211–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, S. W., Patricelli, G. L. & Borgia, G. (2004). Variable female preferences drive complex male displays. Nature, 428, 742–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cords, M. (1995). Predator vigilance costs of allogrooming in wild blue monkeys. Behaviour, 132(7), 559–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioural Science, 2, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall'Olio, S., Norscia, I., Antonacci, D. & Palagi, E. (2012). Sexual signalling in Propithecus verreauxi: Male ‘chest badge’ and female mate choice. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e37332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M. (1986). The integration of dominance and social bonding in primates. Quarterly Review of Biology, 61, 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Waal, F. B. (1997). The chimpanzee's service economy: food for grooming. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drews, C. (1993). The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour. Behaviour, 125, 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
East, M. L. & Hofer, H. (2001). Male spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) queue for status in social groups dominated by females. Behavioral Ecology, 12(5), 558–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery-Thompson, M. (2009). Human rape: revising evolutionary perspectives. In: Muller, M. N. & Wrangham, R. W. (eds), Sexual Coercion in Primates and Humans: An Evolutionary Perspective on Male Aggression Against Females. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 346–374.
Fisher, H. S., Swaisgood, R. & Fitch-Snyder, H. (2003). Countermarking by male pygmy lorises (Nycticebus pygmaeus): do females use odor cues to select mates with high competitive abilities?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 53, 123–130.Google Scholar
Fruteau, C., Voelkl, B., van Damme, E. & Noë, R. (2009). Supply and demand determine the market value of food providers in wild vervet monkeys. PNAS, 106, 12007–12012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fruteau, C., Lemoine, S., Hellard, E., Van Damme, E. & Noë, R. (2011). When females trade grooming for grooming: testing partner control and partner choice models of cooperation in two primate species. Animal Behaviour, 81, 1223–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fusani, L. & Schlinger, B. A. (2012). Proximate and ultimate causes of male courtship behavior in Golden-collared Manakins. Journal of Ornithology, 153, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, A. T. & Shackelford, T. K. (2006). Sexual coercion and forced in-pair copulation as sperm competition tactics in humans. Human Nature, 17, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, C. M., Mundry, R. & Boesch, C. (2009). Long-term reciprocation of grooming in wild West African chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 699–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, L. M. & Roberts, S. C. (2001). Scent-marking by male mammals: cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 30, 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumert, M. D. (2007). Payment for sex in a macaque mating market. Animal Behaviour, 74(6), 1655–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, J. L. (1986). Resolution of social conflicts: dominance, egalitarianism, spheres of dominance, and game theory. Quarterly Review of Biology, 61, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawlena, H., Bashary, D., Abramsky, Z. & Krasnov, B. R. (2007). Benefits, costs and constraints of anti-parasitic grooming in adult and juvenile rodents. Ethology, 113, 394–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M. & Brooks, R. (2006). Sexual coercion and the opportunity for sexual selection in guppies. Animal Behaviour, 71, 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemelrijk, C. K. (1994). Support for being groomed in long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis. Animal Behaviour, 48, 479–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henzi, S. P. & Barrett, L. (2002). Infants as a commodity in a baboon market. Animal Behaviour, 63, 915–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heymann, E. W. (2006). Scent marking strategies of New World primates. American Journal of Primatology, 68, 650–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (1976). Towards understanding relationships: dynamic stability. In: Bateson, P. P. G., and Hinde, R. A. (eds), Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 451–479.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1979). The nature of social structure. In: Hamburg, D. A & McCown, E. R. (eds), The Great Apes. Menlo Pk, CA: Benjaming Cummings.
Hrdy, S. B. (1981). The Woman that Never Evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hurst, J. L. & Beynon, R. J. (2004). Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice. Bioessays, 26(12), 1288–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, M. & Barash, D. P. (1976). Grooming in primates: implications for its utilitarian function. Primates, 17(2), 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, A. (1972). Troop continuity and troop spacing in Propithecus verreauxi and Lemur catta at Berenty (Madagascar). Folia Primatologica, 17, 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, A. (1984). The puzzle of female feeding priority. In: Small, M. (ed.), Female Primates: Studies by Women Primatologists. New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 197–215.
Jones, C. B. & Van Cantfort, T. E. (2007). Multimodal communication by male mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in sexual contexts: a descriptive analysis. Folia Primatologica, 78(3), 166–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, N. R. (2007). Scent-marking investment is determined by sex and breeding status in meerkats. Animal Behaviour, 74, 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappeler, P. M. & Schäffler, L. (2008). The lemur syndrome unresolved: extreme male reproductive skew in sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi), a sexually monomorphic primate with female dominance. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1007–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapsalis, E. & Berman, C. M. (1996). Models of affiliative relationships among free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Behaviour, 133(15), 1235–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keverne, E. B., Martensz, N. D. & Tuite, B. (1989). Beta-endorphin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of monkeys are influenced by grooming relationships. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 14(1), 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C., Heistermann, M. & Kappeler, P. M. (1999). Physiological suppression of sexual function of subordinate males: a subtle form of intrasexual competition among male sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi)?Physiology & Behavior, 66(5), 855–861.Google Scholar
Kummer, H. (1971). Primate Societies: Group Techniques of Ecological Adaptation. Arlington Heights, IL: AHM Publishing Corporation.
Lazaro-Perea, C., Snowdon, C. & de Fatima Arruda, M. (1999). Scent-marking behavior in wild groups of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. J. (2002). Beyond dominance: the importance of leverage. Quarterly Review of Biology, 77, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. J. (2004). Male–female relationships in sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi): power, conflict, and cooperation. Dissertation, Durham, NC: Duke University.
Lewis, R. J. (2005). Sex differences in scent-marking in sifaka: mating conflict or male services?American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 128, 389–398.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. J. (2008). Social influences on group membership in Verreaux's sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi). International Journal of Primatology, 29, 1249–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. J. (2009). Chest staining variation as a signal of testosterone levels in male Verreaux's Sifaka. Physiology and Behavior, 96(4), 586–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. J. (2010). Grooming pattern in Verreaux's sifaka. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 254–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. J. (2015). The evolution of subordination and social complexity: an analysis of power in Verreaux's sifaka. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 156, 203.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. J. & Kappeler, P. M. (2005). Seasonality, body condition, and the timing of reproduction in Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi in the Kirindy Forest. American Journal of Primatology, 67, 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. J. & Kirk, E. C. (2008). Female dominance and monomorphism: Are patterns of intersexual dominance influenced by sexual dimorphism?American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 135, 140.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. J. & van Schaik, C. P. (2007). Bimorphism in male Verreaux's sifaka in the Kirindy Forest of Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 28, 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestripieri, D. (1993). Vigilance costs of allogrooming in macaque mothers. American Naturalist, 141, 744–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malthus, T. R. (1797). An Essay on the Principle of Population. London: Printed for J. Johnson, in St. Paul's Church-Yard.
Matsueda, R. L., Kreager, D. A. & Huizinga, D. (2006). Deterring delinquents: a rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71, 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, J. M., Barta, Z., Fromhage, L. & Houston, A. I. (2008). The coevolution of choosiness and cooperation. Nature, 451, 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooring, M. S., McKenzie, A. A. & Hart, B. L. (1996). Grooming in impala: role of oral grooming in removal of ticks and effects of ticks in increasing grooming rate. Physiology and Behavior, 59, 965–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, M. N. & Wrangham, R. W. (eds). (2009). Sexual Coercion in Primates and Humans: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Newton-Fisher, N. E. & Lee, P. C. (2011). Grooming reciprocity in wild male chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 81, 439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noë, R. (2001). Biological markets: partner choice as the driving force behind the evolution of mutualism. In: Noë, R., van Hoof, J. A. R. A. M. & Hammerstein, P. (eds), Economics in Nature. Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–118.CrossRef
Noë, R. (2006). Digging for the roots of trading. In: Kappeler, P. M. & van Schaik, C. P. (eds) Cooperation in Primates and Humans. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 233–261.CrossRef
Noë, R. & Hammerstein, P. (1994). Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noë, R. & Hammerstein, P. (1995). Biological markets. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10, 336–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noë, R., van Schaik, C. P. & van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1991). The market effect: an explanation of pay-off asymmetries among collaborating animals. Ethology, 87, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norscia, I & Palagi, E. (2011). Fragment quality and distribution of the arboreal primate Propithecus verreauxi in the spiny forest of South Madagascar. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 27, 103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norscia, I., Carrai, V. & Borgognoni-Tarli, S. M. (2006). Influence of dry season, food quality and quantity on behavior and feeding strategy of Propithecus verrreauxi in Kirindy, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 27, 1001–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norscia, I., Antonacci, D. & Palagi, E. (2009). Mating first, mating more: biological market fluctuation in a wild prosimian. PLoS ONE, 4(3), e4679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, C. L. & Lewis, R. J. (2001). Cooperation and collective action in animal behavior. In: Noë, R., van Hoof, J. A. R. A. M. & Hammerstein, P. (eds), Economics in Nature. Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–66.
Oliveira, R. F., Taborsky, M. & Brockmann, J. (2008). Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Ortiz, K. M. & Lewis, R. J. (2015). The influence of fighting ability and reproduction in intersexual relationships in Verreaux's sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 156 (S60), 242–243.Google Scholar
Palagi, E., Telara, S. & Borgognini-Tarli, S. M. (2004). Reproductive strategies in Lemur catta: balance among sending, receiving and countermarking scent signals. International Journal of Primatology, 25, 1019–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palagi, E., Antonacci, D. & Norscia, I. (2008). Peacemaking on treetops: first evidence of reconciliation from a wild prosimian (Propithecus verreauxi). Animal Behaviour, 76(3), 737–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paoli, T. & Palagi, E. (2008). What does agonistic dominance imply in bonobos?. In: The Bonobos. New York: Springer, pp. 39–54.CrossRef
Pereira, M. E., Strohecker, R. A., Cavigelli, S. A., Hughes, C. L. & Pearson, D. D. (1999). Metabolic strategy and social behavior in Lemuridae. In: Rakotosamimanana, B., Rasamimanana, H., Ganzhorn, J. U & Goodman, S. M. (eds), New Directions in Lemur Studies. New York: Plenum, pp. 93–118.CrossRef
Port, M., Clough, D. & Kappeler, P. M. (2009). Market effects offset the reciprocation of grooming in free-ranging redfronted lemurs, Eulemur fulvus rufus. Animal Behaviour, 77(1), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosen, E. D., Jaeger, R. G. & Hucko, J. A. (2006). Sexual coercion in the salamander Plethodon cinereus: is it merely a result of familiarity?Herpetologica, 62(1), 10–18.Google Scholar
Qvarnström, A. & Forsgren, E. (1998). Should females prefer dominant males?Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13(12), 498–501.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, H. B., Okello, J. B. A., Wittemyer, G., et al. (2008). Age- and tactic-related paternity success in male African elephants. Behavioral Ecology, 19(1), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, C. & Hoel, H. (1997). A summary review of literature relating to workplace bullying. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 181–191.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichard, U. & Sommer, V. (1994). Grooming site preferences in wild white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar). Primates, 35(3), 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, A. F. (1987). Malagasy prosimians: female dominance. In: Smuts, B. B, Cheney, D. L, Seyfarth, R. M, Wrangham, R. W & Struhsaker, T. T (eds), Primate Societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 25–33.
Richard, A. F. (1992). Aggressive competition between males, female-controlled polygyny and sexual monomorphism in a Malagasy primate, Propithecus verreauxi. Journal of Human Evolution, 22(4), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, A. F. & Nicoll, M. E. (1987). Female social dominance and basal metabolism in a Malagasy primate, Propithecus verreauxi. American Journal of Primatology, 12(3), 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, A. F., Dewar, R. E., Schwartz, M. & Ratsirarson, J. (2002). Life in the slow lane? Demography and life histories of male and female sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi). Journal of Zoology, 256, 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberger, A. L. & Strier, K. B. (1989). Adaptive radiation of the ateline primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 18(7), 717–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1938). Power: The Role of Man's Will to Power in the World's Economic and Political Affairs. New York: Norton.
Schaffner, C. & Aureli, F. (2005). Embraces and grooming in captive spider monkeys. International Journal of Primatology, 26, 1093–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schino, G. & Aureli, F. (2008). Grooming reciprocation among female primates: a meta-analysis. Biology Letters, 4(1), 9–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schino, G., Scucchi, S., Maestripieri, D. & Turillazzi, P. G. (1988). Allogrooming as a tension-reduction mechanism: A behavioral approach. American Journal of Primatology, 16(1), 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, E. M., Mann, J., Watson-Capps, J. J., Sargeant, B. L. & Connor, R. C. (2005). Aggression in bottlenose dolphins: evidence for sexual coercion, male-male competition, and female tolerance through analysis of tooth-rake marks and behavior. Behaviour, 142, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M. (1977). A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 65, 671–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M. & Cheney, D. L. (1984). Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature, 308, 541–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shine, R. & Mason, R. T. (2005). Does large body size in males evolve to facilitate forcible insemination? A study on garter snakes. Evolution, 59, 2426–2432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reden, Sitta von. (1998). The commodification of symbols. Reciprocity and its perversions in Menander. In: Gill, C., Postlethwaite, N. & Seaford, R. (eds), Reciprocity in Ancient Greece. New York: Oxford University Press.
Slater, K. Y., Schaffner, C. M. & Aureli, F. (2007). Embraces for infant handling in spider monkeys: evidence for a biological market?Animal Behaviour, 74, 455–461.Google Scholar
Smuts, B. B. & Smuts, R. W. (1993). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 22, 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopka, P. & Macdonald, D. W. (1999). The market effect in the wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus: selling information on reproductive status. Ethology, 105, 969–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strier, K. B. (1994). Myth of the typical primate. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 37, 233–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strier, K. B. (2011). Social plasticity and demographic variation in primates. In: Sussman, R. W. & Cloninger, C. R. (eds), Origins of Altruism and Cooperation. NY: Springer, pp. 179–192.CrossRef
Strier, K. B. & Ives, A. R. (2012). Unexpected demography in the recovery of an endangered primate population. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e44407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strier, K. B., Mendes, F. D. C., Rímoli, J. & Odalia Rímoli, A. (1993). Demography and social structure in one group of muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides). International Journal of Primatology, 14, 513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strier, K. B., Boubli, J. P., Possamai, C. B. & Mendes, S. L. (2006). Population demography of northern muriquis (Brachyteles hypoxanthus) at the Estação Biológica de Caratinga/Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural-Feliciano Miguel Abdala, Minas Gerais, Brazil. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 130(2), 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strier, K. B., Chaves, P. B., Mendes, S. L., Fagundes, V. & Di Fiore, A. (2011). Low paternity skew and the influence of maternal kin in an egalitarian, patrilocal primate. PNAS, 108, 18915–18919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabacow, F. P., Mendes, S. L. & Strier, K. B. (2009). Spread of a terrestrial tradition in an arboreal primate. American Anthropologist, 111, 238–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R. (1980). Rape in Panorpa scorpionflies and a general rape hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 28, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R. & Thornhill, N. W. (1983). Human rape: An evolutionary analysis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 137–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiddi, B., Aureli, F & Schino, G. (2010). Grooming for infant handling in tufted capuchin monkeys: a reappraisal of the primate infant market. Animal Behaviour, 79, 1115–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiddi, B., Aureli, F. & Schino, G. (2012). Grooming up the hierarchy: The exchange of grooming and rank-related benefits in a New World Primate. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventura, R., Majolo, B., Koyama, N. F., Hardie, S. & Schino, G. (2006). Reciprocation and interchange in wild Japanese macaques: grooming, cofeeding, and agonistic support. American Journal of Primatology, 68(12), 1138–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, W., Qi, X., Garber, P. A., et al. (2013). Supply and demand determine the market value of access to infants in the Golden Snub-Nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana). PLoS ONE, 8, e65962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, G. D., Strassmann, J. E., Ivens, A. B., et al. (2014). Evolution of microbial markets. PNAS, 111(4), 1237–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, B. B. M. & Candolin, U. (2005). How is female mate choice affected by male competition?Biological Reviews, 80, 559–571.Google Scholar
Wright, P. C. (1999). Lemur traits and Madagascar ecology: coping with an island environment. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 110 (s29), 31–72.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×