Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T10:14:59.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Normativity of Self-Grounded Reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2009

David Copp
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In this chapter, I propose, and then attempt to ground, a standard of practical rationality. According to this standard, to a first approximation, rationality consists in the efficient pursuit of what one values. This standard differs from the familiar principle of instrumental reason, which requires us to take the most efficient means to our ends, for it gives special emphasis to those of our ends that qualify as our values. It also differs from the principle of self-interest, which requires us to pursue our own good, both because we might value the good of others as much as our own good, and because, if we are unwise, we might value things that are bad for ourselves. I speak of the conception of rationality I develop as “self-grounded” because it requires the pursuit of a person's own values, and also because, as I shall argue, a person's values are grounded in her identity, on one useful conception of the identity of persons.

The idea of grounding a standard of rationality will require some discussion. The term comes from Immanuel Kant, as does my strategy, broadly understood, for I aim to ground the standard of self-grounded reason in the idea of autonomous agency, which of course is a strategy inspired by Kant's work in the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. The account I shall give of autonomous agency is very different from Kant's, however, and my conception of rationality is modest by comparison with a Kantian conception.

Type
Chapter
Information
Morality in a Natural World
Selected Essays in Metaethics
, pp. 309 - 354
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appiah, K. Anthony. 1994. “Identity, Authenticity, Survival: Multicultural Societies and Social Reproduction.” In Charles Taylor et al., Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, ed. Gutman, Amy, 149–164. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1998. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Ross, David, Urmson, J. O., and Ackrill, J. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arpaly, Nomy. 2000. “On Acting Rationally Against One's Best Judgment.” Ethics 110: 488–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael. 1987. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael. 1996. “Identification, Decision, and Treating as a Reason.” Philosophical Topics 24: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael. 2000. “Reflection, Planning, and Temporally Extended Agency.” Philosophical Review 109: 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael. 2003. “Autonomy and Hierarchy.” Social Philosophy and Policy 20: 156–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael. 2004. “Planning Agency, Autonomous Agency.” In Personal Autonomy, ed. Taylor, James Stacey, 35–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broome, John. 1999. “Normative Requirements.” Ratio [new series] 12: 398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, Sarah. 2004. “The Irrationality of Unhappiness and the Paradox of Despair.” Journal of Philosophy 101: 167–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohon, Rachel. 1993. “Internalism about Reasons for Action.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74: 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copp, David. 1992. “The ‘Possibility’ of a Categorical Imperative: Kant's Groundwork, Part III.” Philosophical Perspectives 6: 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copp, David. 1993. “Reason and Needs.” In Frey and Morris 1993: 112–137.CrossRef
Copp, David. 1995. Morality, Normativity, and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Copp, David. 2001. “Rationality, Autonomy, and Basic Needs.” In Being Humans, ed. Roughley, Neil, 334–355. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Copp, David. 2002. “Social Unity and the Identity of Persons.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10: 365–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 2002. Welfare and Rational Care. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deigh, John. 1995. “Shame and Self-Esteem: A Critique.” In Dillon 1995: 133–156.
Dillon, Robin S., ed. 1995. Dignity, Character, and Self-Respect. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin, and Ravizza, Mark S. J. 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa. 1978a. “Moral Beliefs.” In Foot 1978c: 110–131.
Foot, Philippa. 1978b. “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives.” In Foot 1978c: 157–174.
Foot, Philippa. 1978c. Virtues and Vices. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Frey, R. G., and Morris, Christopher, ed. 1993. Value, Welfare, and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, Allan. 1990. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Greenspan, Patricia. 1975. “Conditional Obligations and Hypothetical Imperatives.” Journal of Philosophy 72: 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1993. “Desired Desires.” In Frey and Morris 1993: 138–157.CrossRef
Hubin, Donald C. 1991. “Irrational Desires.” Philosophical Studies 62: 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubin, Donald C.. 1996. “Hypothetical Motivation.” NoÛs 30: 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubin, Donald C.. 2001. “The Groundless Normativity of Instrumental Rationality.” Journal of Philosophy 98: 445–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank. 2003. “Cognitivism, A Priori Deduction, and Moore.” Ethics 113: 557–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1785. Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Ellington, James W.. Rpt., Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 1981.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1992. “The Naturalists Return.” Philosophical Review 101: 53–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Ed. O'Neill, Onora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1997. “The Normativity of Instrumental Reason.” In Ethics and Practical Reason, ed. Cullity, Garrett and Gaut, Berys, 215–254. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Krakauer, Jon. 1998. Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mount Everest Disaster. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lance, Mark, and Little, Margaret. 2004. “Defeasibility and the Normative Grasp of Context.” Erkenntnis 61: 435–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Gavin. 2002. “The Rationality of Morality.” In Virtues and Reasons, ed. Hursthouse, Rosalind, Lawrence, Gavin, and Quinn, Warren, 89–148. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Oshana, Marina. 1998. “Personal Autonomy and Society.” Journal of Social Philosophy 29: 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1991. “Consequentialism.” In A Companion to Ethics, ed. Singer, Peter, 230–240. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, and Smith, Michael. 1990. “Backgrounding Desire.” Philosophical Review 99: 565–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, David. 1995. Rational Choice and Moral Agency. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Gabriele. 1995. “Shame, Integrity, and Self-Respect.” In Dillon 1995: 157–179.
Velleman, J. David. 1996. “The Possibility of Practical Reason.” Ethics 106: 694–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VellemanDavid, J.. 2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay. 2001. “Normativity, Commitment, and Instrumental Reason.” Philosophers' Imprint 1: 3–10. Http://www.philosophersimprint.org/001003.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×