Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T20:22:13.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - From affirmation to interruption of femininity in the music classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2009

Lucy Green
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access

Summary

GIRLS AND BOYS MAKING MUSIC! TEACHERS' AND PUPILS' PERCEPTIONS

In the last chapter I concentrated almost entirely on the discourse surrounding the musical practices of girls in schools. Here, I will continue to invoke that discourse as a background to my discussion. Against this background, I will examine ways in which teachers and pupils wrote and talked about those areas of school musical life which girls are seen to avoid, but around which boys are perceived to congregate.

Attitudes

Teachers' views of girls' ‘enabling attitudes’ towards music, as described in Chapter 6, contrasted strongly with their characterisations of boys' attitudes. Whereas girls were seen to use music to express their feelings, to be cooperative and persevering in their musical practices, boys were understood characteristically to denunciate the majority of musical activities that are on offer in the school. The teachers saw this denunciation as being expressed in several ways, of which four notable ones are as follows. First, boys prefer sport to music, a choice between the two being a frequent necessity in schools where they often compete for extracurricular time. Secondly, boys create and succumb readily to heavy peer-group pressure against school music. Thirdly, they lay emphasis on what is musically ‘fashionable’ or ‘in at the moment’, which by definition does not include music that is in the school curriculum. Fourthly, they avoid certain musical activities for the reason that these are seen to be ‘cissy’ and ‘un-macho’. I have reproduced all the relevant comments below. This is again partly in the interests of accurate representation, and also because I find that the build-up of comments, the independent reiteration of similar fundamental notions by so many people, provide the best available illustration of the workings of discourse within common sense.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×