Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T07:32:05.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Matthew E. K. Hall
Affiliation:
St Louis University, Missouri
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, C. F., and Hacker, Hans J.. 2006. “Local Compliance with Supreme Court Decisions: Making Space for Religious Expression in Public Schools.” Journal of Church and State 48(2):355–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, ed. 2002. Bush v. Gore: The Question of Legitimacy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Adamany, David. 1973. “Legitimacy, Realigning Elections and the Supreme Court.” Wisconsin Law Review 1973:790–846.Google Scholar
Adamczyk, Amy, Wybraniec, John, and Finke, Roger. 2004. “Religious Regulation and the Courts: Documenting the Effects of Smith and RFRA.” The Journal of Church and State 46:237–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Scott. 2003. “Congressional District Data File.” University of Colorado, Boulder, CO. http://socsci.colorado.edu/~esadler/districtdatawebsite/CongressionalDistrictDatasetwebpage.htm.
,American Library Association (ALA). 1970–95. The Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom. Chicago: Intellectual Freedom Committee of the American Library Association.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Gerber, Alan, and Snyder, James. 2002. “Equal Votes, Equal Money: Court-Ordered Redistricting and Public Expenditures in the American States.” American Political Science Review 96(4):767–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Snyder, James. 2008. The End of Inequality: One Person, One Vote, and the Transformation of American Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Arkes, Hadley. 1992. First Things. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
,Association of American Publishers, American Library Association, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (AAP). 1981. Limiting What Students Shall Read: Books and Other Learning Materials in Our Public Schools: How they Are Selected and How They Are Removed. Washington: Association of American Publishers.Google Scholar
Ball, Howard. 2000. The Bakke Case: Race, Education, and Affirmative Action. University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Ban, Michael. 1973a. “The Impact of Mapp v. Ohio on Police Behavior.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, May.
Ban, Michael 1973b. “Local Courts v. The Supreme Court: The Impact of Mapp v. Ohio.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA, September.
Banks, Christopher P., Cohen, Michael E., and Green, John Clifford, eds. 2005. The Final Arbiter: The Consequences of Bushv. Gore for Law and Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Barreto, Matt A., Segura, Gary M., and Woods, Nathan D.. 2004. “The Mobilizing Effect of Majority-Minority Districts on Latino Turnout.” American Political Science Review 98(1):65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, N. V. 1969. The Rise of Massive Resistance: Race and Politics in the South during the 1950's. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2003. “The Supreme Court in American Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 6:161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazelon, David. L. 1976. “The Realities of Gideon and Argersinger.” Georgetown Law Journal 64:811–38.Google Scholar
Beaney, William M. and Beiser, Edward N.. 1964. “Prayer and Politics: The Impact of Engel and Schempp on the Political Process.” Journal of Public Law 13:475–503.Google Scholar
Bedau, Hugo Adam. 1998. The Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies. Oxford University Press.
Benesh, Sarah C. and Reddick, Malia. 2002. “Overruled: An Event History Analysis of Lower Court Reaction to Supreme Court Precedent.” Journal of Politics 64(2):534–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Roger W. and Pedeliski, Theodore B.. 1969. “The Minnesota Public Defender System and the Criminal Law Process: A Comparative Study of Behavior at the Judicial District Level.” Law & Society Review 4(2):279–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, Laurance A. 1975. “Tokenism and the American Indigent: Some Perspectives on Defense Services.” American Criminal Law Review 12:667–88.Google Scholar
Berutti, Ronald A. 1992. “The Cherokee Cases: The Fight to Save the Supreme Court and the Cherokee Indians.” American Indian Law Review 17:291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Alexander. [1962] 1986. The Least Dangerous Branch. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Birkby, Robert H. 1966The Supreme Court and the Bible Belt: Tennessee Reaction to the ‘Schempp’ Decision.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 10(3):304–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitler, Marianne and Zavodny, Madeline. 2002. “Did Abortion Legalization Reduce the Number of Unwanted Children? Evidence from Adoptions.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 34(1):25–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, Charles. 1960. The People and the Court: Judicial Review in a Democracy. New York: Macmillan.
Blatnik, Edward J. W. 1998. “No RFRAF Allowed: The Status of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act's Federal Application in the Wake of City of Boerne v. Flores.” Columbia Law Review 98(6):1410–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Craig. 1993. The Failure of the Criminal Procedure Revolution. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravin, Jesse. 2005. “Voting Cases Could Shape Debate Over Alito.” The Wall Street Journal, November 21.Google Scholar
Brent, James. 1999. “An Agent and Two Principals: U.S. Court of Appeals Reponses to Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.” American Politics Quarterly 27(2):236–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, James 2003. “A Principal-Agent Analysis of the U.S. Courts of Appeals Responses to Boerne v. Flores.” American Politics Research 31(5):557–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosi, Kathleen B. 1979. A Cross-City Comparison of Felony Case Processing. Washington: Institute for Law and Social Research.Google Scholar
Bruni, Frank. 2000. “Bush Remains Upbeat as the Tension Mounts.” The New York Times, November 8.Google Scholar
,Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2006. “Capital Punishment, 2006 – Statistical Tables.” Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/exe.htm.
Burress, Lee. 1989. Battle of the Books: Literary Censorship in the Public Schools, 1950–1985. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
Caldeira, Gregory A. and Gibson, James L.. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36(3):635–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. and Zorn, Christopher J. W.. 1998. “Of Time and Consensual Norms in the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 42(3): 874–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles, Epstein, David, and Sharyn, O'Halloran. 1996. “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?American Political Science Review 90(4):794–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C. 1974. “Is the Exclusionary Rule in Failing Health? Some New Data and a Plea against a Precipitous Conclusion.” Kentucky Law Journal 62:703–7.Google Scholar
Canon, Bradley C 1977. “Testing the Effectiveness of Civil Liberties Policies at the State and Federal Levels: The Case of the Exclusionary Rule.” American Politics Quarterly 5(1):57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C. and Johnson, Charles A.. 1999. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. 2nd Ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy Making.” American Political Science Review 70(1):50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassell, Paul G. 1996a. “Miranda's Social Costs: An Empirical Reassessment.” Northwestern University Law Review 90(2): 387.Google Scholar
Cassell, Paul G 1996b. “All Benefits, No Costs: The Grand Illusion of Miranda's Defenders.” Northwestern University Law Review 90(3):1084–124.Google Scholar
Cassell, Paul G 1997. “Miranda's ‘Negligible’ Effect on Law Enforcement: Some Skeptical Observations.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 20(2):327–46.Google Scholar
Cassell, Paul G. and Fowles, Richard. 1998a. “Handcuffing the Cops? A Thirty-Year Perspective on Miranda's Harmful Effects on Law Enforcement.” Stanford Law Review 50:1055–2245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassell, Paul G 1998b. “Falling Clearance Rates After Miranda: Coincidence or Consequence?Stanford Law Review 50:1181–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Centers for Disease Control. 1969–2003. “Abortion Surveillance Report.” Washington: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Reproductive Health.
Clayton, Cornell W. and Mitchell Pickerill, J.. 2006. “The Politics of Criminal Justice: How the New Right Regime Shaped the Rehnquist Court's Criminal Justice Jurisprudence.” Georgetown Law Journal 94(June):1385–425.Google Scholar
Clegg, Roger. 2005. “Time Has Not Favored Racial Preferences.” Chronicle of Higher Education 51(19):B10. January 14.Google Scholar
,Comptroller General of the United States. 1979. “Impact of the Exclusionary Rule on Federal Criminal Prosecutions.” Washington: General Accounting Office, Rep. No. CDG-79–45.
,Congressional Record. 1956. 84th Cong., Vol. 102.
Cox, Gary W. and Katz, Jonathon N.. 1999. “The Reapportionment Revolution and Bias in U.S. Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 43(3):812–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cushman, Barry. 1998. Rethinking the New Deal Court. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6:279.Google Scholar
Davies, Thomas Y. 1982. “Affirmed: A Study of Criminal Appeals and Decision-Making Norms in a California Court of Appeal.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 7(3):543–648.Google Scholar
Davies, Thomas Y 1983. “A Hard Look at What We Know (And Still Need to Learn) about the ‘Costs’ of the Exclusionary Rule: The NIJ Study and Other Studies of ‘Lost’ Arrests.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 8(3):611–90.Google Scholar
Davis, James A., Smith, Tom W., and Marsden, Peter V.. 2007. General Social Surveys, 1972–2006. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut / Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research / Berkeley, CA: Computer-assisted Survey Methods Program (http://sda.berkeley.edu), University of California.Google Scholar
DeFrances, Carol J. 2001. “State-Funded Indigent Defense Services, 1999.” Bureau of Justice Statistics. NCJ 188464.
DeVoe, Jill F., Peter, Katharin, Kaufman, Phillip, Miller, Amanda, Snyder, Thomas D., and Baum, Katrina. 2004. “Indicators of School Crime and Safety.” Washington: National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 2005–002; Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 205290.
Dierenfield, R. B. 1962. Religion in American Public Schools. Washington: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
DiNardo, John. 2007. “Interesting Questions in Freakonomics.” Journal of Economic Literature XLV:973–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dionne, E. J., Jr., and Kristol, William. 2001. Bush v. Gore: The Court Cases and the Commentary. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Dolbeare, Kenneth M. and Hammond, Phillip E.. 1971. The School Prayer Decisions: From Court Policy to Local Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Donohue, John J., III. 1998. “Did Miranda Diminish Police Effectiveness?Stanford Law Review 50:1147–80.Google Scholar
Donohue, John J., III, and Levitt, Steven D.. 2001. “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime.” Quarterly Journal of Economics CXVI(2):379–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, John J., 2008. “Measurement Error, Legalized Abortion, and the Decline in Crime: A Response to Foote and Goetz.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(1):425–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, William O. 1956. We, the Judges: Studies in American and Indian Constitutional Law from Marshal to Mukherjea. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Drecksel, Paul Calvin. 1991. “The Crisis in Indigent Defense Systems.” Arkansas Law Review 44:363–408.Google Scholar
Dreyfuss, Joel and Lawrence, Charles. 1979. The Bakke Case: Politics of Inequality. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Dudley, Louise M. 1995. “Board Changes Funding Guidelines: Student Religious Publications Now Eligible.” UVaToday, August 25.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, ed. 2002. A Badly Flawed Election: Debating Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court, and American Democracy. New York: New Press.
Edwards, George C., III. 1980. Presidential Influence in Congress. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C., III 1985. “Measuring Presidential Success in Congress: Alternative Approaches.” Journal of Politics 47:667–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Employment Standards Administration. 1983–90. “Minimum Wage and Maximum Hours Standards under the Fair Labor Standards Act.” Washington: U.S. Department of Labor.
Enemark, Christine E. 1997. “Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena: Forcing the Federal Communications Commission into a New Constitutional Regime.” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 30(2):215–66.Google Scholar
Engel, Stephen. 2009. “A Mere Party Machine”? Judicial Authority, Party Development, and the Changing Politics of Attacking the Courts. Dissertation, Yale University.
Epstein, Lee and Knight, Jack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee and Kobylka, Joseph F.. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Walker, Thomas G.. 1995. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Institutional Powers and Constraints. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Eskridge, William N. 1991a. “Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game.” California Law Review 79(3):613–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskridge, William N 1991b. “Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions.” Yale Journal 101(2):331–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcom M. 1973. “Power, Impact, and the Supreme Court.” In The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions, ed. Becker, Theodore L. and Feeley, Malcolm M.. 2d ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, Floyd, Dill, Forrest, and Weir, Adriane. 1983. “Arrests Without Conviction: How Often They Occur and Why.” Washington: National Institute of Justice.
Ferejohn, John. 2002. “Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems 65(3):41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 1993. “The Legislative Veto: Invalidated, It Survives.” Law and Contemporary Problems 56(4):273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Louis 2005. “Legislative Vetoes After Chadha.”Washington: Congressional Research Service, RS22132.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Matthew L.M. 2007. “Bringing Balance to Indian Gaming.” Harvard Journal on Legislation 44:39.Google Scholar
Fletcher, William A. 1982. The Discretionary Constitution: Institutional Remedies and Judicial Legitimacy.” Yale Law Journal 91(4):635–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, Christopher L. and Goetz, Christopher F.. 2008. “The Impact of Abortion on Crime: Comment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(1):407–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, Brian, Lucianovic, Judith, and Cox, Sarah J.. 1977. “What Happens After Arrest? A Court Perspective of Police Operations in the District of Columbia.” PROMIS Research Project Publication. Washington: Institute for Law and Social Research.
Forst, Brian, Lucianovic, Judith, and Cox, Sarah J. 1982. “Arrest Convictability as a Measure of Police Performance.” Washington: National Institute of Justice.
Frankfurter, Felix. 1954. Some Observations on Supreme Court Litigation and Legal Education (The Ernst Freund Lecture). University of Chicago Press.
Franklin, Charles H. and Kosaki, Liane C.. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: the U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83(3):751–71 .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frymer, Paul. 2003. “Acting When Elected Officials Won't: Federal Courts and Civil Rights Enforcement in U.S. Labor Unions.” American Political Science Review 97(3):483–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funston, Richard. 1975. “The Supreme Court and Critical Elections.” American Political Science Review 69(3): 795–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, Claudine. 2001. “The Effect of Minority Districts and Minority Representation on Political Participation in California.” San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
,General Accounting Office. 1987. “Compensatory Education: Chapter 1 Services Provided to Private Sectarian School Students.” Washington: General Accounting Office, GAO/HRD-87–128BR.
,General Accounting Office 1989. “Compensatory Education: Aguilar v. Felton Decision's Continuing Impact on Chapter 1 Program.”Washington: General Accounting Office, GAO/HRD-89–131BR.Google Scholar
,General Accounting Office 1993. “Compensatory Education: Additional Funds Help More Private School Students Receive Chapter 1 Services.” Washington: General Accounting Office, GAO/HRD-93–65.
,General Accounting Office 1996. “Gun Control: Implementation of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.” Washington: General Accounting Office, GAO/GGD-96–22.
,General Accounting Office 2000. “Options for Improving the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.” Washington: General Accounting Office, GAO/GGD-00–56.
,General Accounting Office 2001. “Status of Small Disadvantaged Business Certifications.” Washington: General Accounting Office, GAO-01–273.
Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Gillman, Howard 2000. The Votes That Counted: How the Court Decided the 2000 Presidential Election. University of Chicago Press.
Gillman, Howard 2002. “How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas: Federal Courts in the United States, 1875–1891.” American Political Science Review 96(3):511–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glater, Jonathan D. 2006. “Colleges Open Minority Aid to All Comers.” The New York Times, March 14.Google Scholar
Goldman, Jerry. 2005. “The Canon of Constitutional Law Revisited.” Law and Politics Book Review 15(8):648–56.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Robert Justin. 1995. “Two Centuries of Flagburnings in the United States.” The Flag Bulletin 163:65–77.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 1993. “The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary.” Studies in American Political Development 7(Spring):35–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Mark A 1998. “Establishing Judicial Review? Schooner Peggy and the Early Marshall Court.” Political Research Quarterly 51(1): 221–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Mark A 1999. “The Problematic Establishment of Judicial Review.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, ed. Gillman, Howard, Cornell Clayton. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A 2005. “Constructing Judicial Review.” Annual Review of Political Science 8:425–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigg, Delia and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2005. “The Impact of Majority-Minority Districts on Congressional Elections.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 7–10, 2005, Chicago, IL.
Grose, Christian R. 2005. “Disentangling Constituency and Legislator Effects in Legislative Representation: Black Legislators or Black Districts?Social Science Quarterly 86(2):427–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruhl, John. 1980. “The Supreme Court's Impact on the Law of Libel: Compliance by Lower Federal Courts.” Western Political Quarterly 33(4):502–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruhl, John and Welch, Susan. 1990. “The Impact of the Bakke Decision on Black and Hispanic Enrollment in Medical and Law Schools.” Social Science Quarterly 71(3):458–73.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2010. “Bringing Down Brown: Super Precedents, Myths of Rediscovery and the Retroactive Canonization of Brown v. Board of Education.” Journal of Law and Policy 16(3):655–99.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. 1961. The Federalist 78.
Hand, Learned. 1960. “The Spirit of Liberty,” speech at an “I Am an American Day” ceremony, Central Park, New York City, May 21, 1944. In The Spirit of Liberty, ed. Dilliard, Irving. 3d ed. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Handberg, Roger and Hill, Harold F., Jr. 1980. “Court Curbing, Court Reversals, and Judicial Review: The Supreme Court versus Congress.” Law & Society Review 14(2):309–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Susan B. 1980. “State Implementation of Supreme Court Decisions: Abortion Rates Since Roe v. Wade.” Journal of Politics 42(2):372–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Kevin. 1995. “Does the Creation of Black Majority Districts Aid Republicans: An Analysis of the 1992 Congressional Elections in Eight Southern States.” Journal of Politics 57(2):384–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Toward Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2000. “The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 94(1):89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie. 2005. “Competing Constraints: State Court Responses to Supreme Court Decisions and Legislation on Wages and Hours.” Political Research Quarterly 58(2):317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Dianne McAfee. 1995. “Challenges to Library Materials from Principals in United States Secondary Schools – A ‘Victory’ of Sorts.” School Libraries Worldwide 1(2)8–29.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Dianne McAfee 1996. “The Library Bill of Rights and School Library Media Programs.” Library Trends 45(1):61.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hulse, Carl. 2008. “Democrats Seek to Block Appointee to Obama's Seat, but Authority Is in Question.” The New York Times, December 31.Google Scholar
Hulse, Carl 2009. “Democrats Open Way to Seat Illinois Pick for Senate.” The New York Times, January 8.Google Scholar
,Intellectual Freedom Committee of the American Library Association. 1970–95. Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom. Chicago: Intellectual Freedom Committee of the American Library Association.Google Scholar
Irons, Peter. 2006. A People's History of the Supreme Court: The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our Constitution. Revised Edition. New York: Penguin Books.
Johnson, Charles A. 1979. “Lower Court Reactions to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 23(4):792–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Charles A 1987. “Law, Politics, and Judicial Decision Making: Lower Federal Court Uses of Supreme Court Decisions.” Law & Society Review 21(2):325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Charles A., and Bradley, C. Canon 1984. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Richard M. 1967. “Compliance and Supreme Court Decision-Making.” Wisconsin Law Review 1967:170–85.Google Scholar
Johnston, Henry P., ed., 4 vols. 1890–93. The Correspondence and Public Papers of John Jay. Vol. 4. New York and London: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
Joyce, Ted. 2004. “Did Legalized Abortion Lower Crime?Journal of Human Resources 39(1):1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Ellis. 1965. “Patterns of Compliance with the Schempp Decision.” Journal of Public Law 14:396–408.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2007. “Party Politics or Judicial Independence? The Regime Politics Literature Hits the Law Schools.” Law & Social Inquiry 32(3):511–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Thomas M 2009. “Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights.” Law & Society Review 42(1):151–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarman, Michael. 1996. “Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions.” Virginia Law Review 82(1):1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarman, Michael 2004. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Klien, Richard. 1986. “The Emperor Gideon Has No Clothes: The Empty Promise of the Constitutional Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 13:625–93.Google Scholar
Korn, Jessica. 1996. The Power of Separation: American Constitutionalism and the Myth of the Legislative Veto. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kramer, Larry D. 2004. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lambert, Ken. 2007. “High Court Rejects School Integration Plans.” The Seattle Times, 28 June.Google Scholar
Lasser, William. 1988. The Limits of Judicial Power. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Laubach, John H. 1969. School Prayers: Congress, the Courts, and the Public. Washington: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey. 2003. “Certiorari and Compliance in the Judicial Hierarchy.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(1):61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiken, Lawrence S. 1970. “Police Interrogation in Colorado: The Implementation of Miranda.” Denver Law Journal 47(1):1–53.Google Scholar
Leo, Richard A. 1996. “The Impact of Miranda Revisited.” In The Miranda Debate, ed. Leo, Richard A. and Thomas, George C., III. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William. 1995. The Supreme Court Reborn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Edward H. 1975. “Prepared Statement of Hon. Edward H. Levi, Attorney General of the United States.” Testimony to the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. November 6.
Levinson, L. Harold. 1987. “The Decline of the Legislative Veto: Federal/State Comparisons and Interactions.” Publius 17(1):115–32.Google Scholar
Light, Steven Andrew, and Rand, Kathryn R.L.. 2007. Indian Gaming & Tribal Sovereignty: The Casino Compromise. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Lovell, George I. 2003. Legislative Deferrals: Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge Press.
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lublin, David 1999. “Racial Redistricting and African-American Representation: A Critic of ‘Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?’American Political Science Review 93(1):183–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lublin, David and Stephen Voss, D.. 2000. “Boll-Weevil Blues: Polarized Congressional Delegations into the 21st Century.” American Review of Politics 21(Winter): 427–50.Google Scholar
Lublin, David and Stephen Voss, D. 2003. “The Missing Middle: Why Median-Voter Theory Can't Save Democrats from Singing the Boll-Weevil Blues.” Journal of Politics 65(1):227–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, John P. 1970. “First Term of the Burger Court is Notable for What Wasn't Done.” The Washington Post, July 7, p. A6.Google Scholar
Manson, Donald A. and Gilliard, Darrell K.. 1997. “Presale Handgun Checks, 1996.” Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Manson, Donald A 1998. “Presale Handgun Checks, 1997.” Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Manson, Donald A., Gilliard, Darrell K., and Lauver, Gene. 1999. “Presale Handgun Checks, the Brady Interim Period, 1994–1998.” Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Manson, Donald A., and Lauver, Gene. 1997. “Presale Firearm Checks.” Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Manwaring, David. 1972. “The Impact of Mapp v. Ohio.” In The Supreme Court as Policy-Maker: Three Case Studies on the Impact of Judicial Decisions, ed. Everson, D.. Carbondale: Public Affairs Research Bureau Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas R. 1989. “Policymaking and the Modern Court: When Do Supreme Court Rulings Prevail?Western Political Quarterly 42(4):493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals.” Polity 6:295–317.CrossRef
Mayhew, David 2004. Congress: The Electoral Connection. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–2002. 2nd Ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCann, Michael W 1999. “How the Supreme Court Matters in American Politics: New Institutionalist Perspectives.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, ed. Gillman, Howard, Clayton, Cornell. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert G. 1960. The American Supreme Court. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew and Schwartz, Thomas. 1988. “Congress, the Courts, and Public Policy: Consequences of the One Man, One Vote Rule.” American Journal of Political Science 32(2):388–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Keven J. 2004. Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race: How the Presidency Paved the Road to Brown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McManus, Doyle and Miller, Alan C.. 2000. “Lawyers Push for Final Appeal, but Gore Passes.” The Los Angeles Times, December 14.Google Scholar
Medalie, Richard J., Zeitz, Leonard, and Alexander, Paul. 1968. “Custodial Police Interrogation in our Nation's Capital: The Attempt to Implement Miranda.” Michigan Law Review 66:1347–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur Selwyn. 1968. The Supreme Court and American Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.
Miller, Arthur Selwyn and Scheflin, Alan W.. 1967. “The Power of the Supreme Court in the Age of the Positive State: A Preliminary Excursus. Part Two: On the Need for Adaptation to Changing Reality.” Duke Law Journal 1967(3):522–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Neal A. 1970. Comparative Analysis of Patterns of Compliance.” Law & Society Review 5(1):119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1990. “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior 12(4):363–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey J 1991. “Substantive and Procedural Aspects of Supreme Court Decisions as Determinants of Approval.” American Politics Quarterly 19(2):174–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey J 1992. “Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly 20(2):457–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monti, Daniel J. 1980. “Administrative Forces in Educational Chicken Coops.” Law and Policy Quarterly 2:233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, John Thomas, ed. 1982. “Gideon Undone: The Crisis in Indigent Defense Funding.” American Bar Association in cooperation with the National Legal Aid and Defender Association.
Mounts, Suzanne E. 1982. “Public Defender Programs, Professional Responsibility, and Competent Representation.” Wisconsin Law Review473–533.Google Scholar
Mounts, Suzanne E., and Wilson, Richard J.. 1986. “Systems for Providing Indigent Defense: An Introduction.” New York University Review of Law and Social Change 14:193–201.Google Scholar
Murphy, Michael. 1966. “The Problem of Compliance by Police Departments.” Texas Law Review 44:939–46.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Jack. 1975. The Descriptive Analysis of Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Robert F. 2001. “Judicial Power and the Restoration of Federalism.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 574:57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Stuart S. 1965. “Law and Society: Testing the Effects of Excluding Illegally Seized Evidence.” Wisconsin Law Review 1965:283–310.Google Scholar
Nardulli, Peter F. 1983. “The Societal Costs of the Exclusionary Rule: An Empirical Assessment.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 8(3):585–609.Google Scholar
Nardulli, Peter F 1987. “The Societal Costs of the Exclusionary Rule Revisited.” University of Illinois Law Review 1987:223–39.Google Scholar
,National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC). 2003. “Diversity and College Admission in 2003: A Survey Report.” Alexandria, VA: National Association for College Admission Counseling.
,National Institute of Justice, United States Department of Justice. 1982. “Criminal Justice Research Report – The Effects of the Exclusionary Rule: A Study in California.” Washington: National Institute of Justice.
Neier, Aryeh. 1982. Only Judgment: The Limits of Litigation in Social Change. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
,Note. 1968. “Effect of Mapp v. Ohio on Police Search-and-Seizure Practices in Narcotics Cases.” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 4:87–104.Google Scholar
,Note 2000. “Gideon's Promise Unfulfilled: The Need for Litigated Reform of Indigent Defense.” Harvard Law Review 113:2062–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oaks, Dallin H. 1970. “Studying the Exclusionary Rule in Search and Seizure.” University of Chicago Law Review 37:665–757.Google Scholar
Orfield, Myron W., Jr. 1987. “The Exclusionary Rule and Deterrence: An Empirical Study of Chicago Narcotics Officers.” University of Chicago Law Review 54(3):1016–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltason, J. W. 1971. Fifty-Eight Lonely Men: Southern Federal Judges and School Desegregation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, Revised Edition.Google Scholar
,People for the American Way (PAW). 1982–93. Attacks on the Freedom to Learn. Washington: People for the American Way.Google Scholar
Peretti, Terri J. 1999. In Defense of a Political Court. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perrin, L. Timothy, Mitchell Caldwell, H., Chase, Carol A., and Fagan, Ronald W.. 1997. “If It's Broken, Fix It: Moving Beyond the Exclusionary Rule.” Iowa Law Review 38:669.Google Scholar
Perry, Barbara A. 2007. The Michigan Affirmative Action Cases. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R. and Desposato, Scott E.. 1998. “The Partisan Consequences of Majority-Minority Redistricting in the South, 1992 and 1994.” Journal of Politics 60(3):613–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickerill, J. Mitchell and Clayton, Cornell W.. 2004. “The Rehnquist Court and the Political Dynamics of Federalism.” Perspectives on Politics 2(2):233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaus, Stephen A. 1991. “Judicial Versus Legislative Charting of National Economic Policy: Plotting a Democratic Course for Minority Entrepreneurs.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 24:655–89.Google Scholar
Prucha, Francis Paul. 1984. The Great Father: The United States Government and the American Indians, volume I. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Radelet, Michael L. n.d. “Thirty Years After Gregg.” Manuscript prepared for Amnesty International. http://www.amnestyusa.org/abolish/greggvgeorgia/study_guide .pdf.
Reed, Douglas S. 2001. On Equal Terms: The Constitutional Politics of Educational Opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Reich, D. 1968. “The Impact of Judicial Decision Making: The School Prayer Cases.” In The Supreme Court as Policy-Maker: Three Case Studies on the Impact of Judicial Decisions, ed. Everson, D.. Carbondale: Public Affairs Research Bureau Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Reichman, Henry. 1993. Censorship and Selection: Issues and Answers for Schools. Chicago: American Library Association.Google Scholar
,Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. 1979. “Court Watch Summary.” The News Media and the Law, June/July, p. 18.Google Scholar
,Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press 1980. “Court Watch Summary.” The News Media and the Law, October/November, p. 34.Google Scholar
,Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press 1981. “Court Watch Summary.” The News Media and the Law, June/July, p. 18.Google Scholar
Rice, Mitchell F. 1999. “Federal Set-Aside Policy and Minority Business Contracting: Understanding the Adarand Decision.” International Journal of Public Administration 22(7):1001–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, James T. 1995. “Legal Status of Minority Religions in the United States.” Social Compass 42:249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Cyril D. 1968. “Police and Prosecutor Practices and Attitudes Relating to Interrogation as Revealed by Pre- and Post-Miranda Questionnaires: A Construct of Police Capacity to Comply.” Duke Law Journal 1968(3):425–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey. 2006. The Most Democratic Branch: How the Courts Serve America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey 2007Can a Law Change a Society?The Nation, 1 July.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? 2d ed. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostow, Eugene V. 1952. “The Democratic Character of Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 66:193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudenstine, David. 1996. The Day the Presses Stopped: A History of the Pentagon Papers Case. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sack, Kevin and Bruni, Frank. 2000. “How Gore Stopped Short On His Way to Concede.” The New York Times, November 9.Google Scholar
Safra, Seth J. 2000. “The Amended Gun-Free School Zones Act: Doubt as to its Constitutionality Remains.” Duke Law Journal 50:637–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saikowski, Charlotte. 1987. “The Power of Judicial Review.” Christian Science Monitor, February 11.Google Scholar
Scalia, John. 2000. “Federal Firearm Offenders, 1992–98.” Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Scheingold, Stuart A. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Schmidt, Peter. 2004. “Since Court Ruled, Fewer Black Students Have Applied to Michigan and Ohio State.” Chronicle of Higher Education 50(26):A22. March 5.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Peter and Young, Jeffrey R.. 2003. “MIT and Princeton Open 2 Summer Programs to Students of All Races.” Chronicle of Higher Education 49(24):A31. February 21.Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J. 1987. “Reconsidering Miranda.” University of Chicago Law Review 54(2):435–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J 1996a. “Miranda's Practical Effect: Substantial Benefits and Vanishingly Small Social Costs.” Northwestern University Law Review 90(2):500–63.Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J 1996b. “Miranda and Clearance Rates.” Northwestern University Law Review 91(1): 278.Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J 1997. “Reconsidering Miranda.” University of Chicago Law Review 54(2): 435–61.
Schultz, D. A., ed. 1998. Leveraging the Law: Using the Courts to Achieve Social Change. New York: Peter Lang.
Seeburger, Richard H. and Stanton Wettick, R., Jr. 1967. “Miranda in Pittsburgh – A Statistical Study.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 29:1–16.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffery A. and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., Spaeth, Harold J., and Epstein, Lee. 2001. “The Norm of Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 45(2):362–77.Google Scholar
,Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations. 1976. “Warrantless F.B.I. Electronic Surveillance.” Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans.Google Scholar
Selingo, Jeffrey. 2005. “Michigan: Who Really Won?Chronicle of Higher Education 51(19):A21. January 14.Google Scholar
,Senate Committee on the Judiciary. 2005. Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of John G. Roberts, Jr. To Be Chief Justice of the United States: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary. 109th Cong. 144–5.
,“Senate lets Reapportionment Ruling Stand.” 1966. CQ Press Electronic Library, CQ Almanac Online Edition, cqal66–1301890. Originally published in CQ Almanac 1966 (Washington: Congressional Quarterly). http://library.cqpress.com/ cqalmanac/cqal66–1301890 (28 January 2009).
Sharpe, Christine Leveaux and Garand, James C.. 2001. “Race, Roll Calls, and Redistricting: The Impact of Race-Based Redistricting on Congressional Roll-Call.” Political Research Quarterly 54(1):31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotts, Kenneth W. 2001. “The Effect of Majority-Minority Mandates on Partisan Gerrymandering.” American Journal of Political Science 45(1):120–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotts, Kenneth W 2002. “Gerrymandering, Legislative Composition, and National Policy Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science 46(2):398–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotts, Kenneth W 2003a. “Does Racial Redistricting Cause Conservative Policy Outcomes? Policy Preferences of Southern Representatives in the 1980s and 1990s.” Journal of Politics 65(1):216–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotts, Kenneth W 2003b. “Racial Redistricting's Alleged Perverse Effects: Theory, Data and ‘Reality’.” The Journal of Politics 65(1):238–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simms, M.C. 1990. “Rebuilding Set-Aside Programs.” Black Enterprise 21(2).Google Scholar
Skolnick, Jerome H. 1966. Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New York: Wiley.
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skowronek, Stephen 1997. The Politics President Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Smith, Steven K. and DeFrances, Carol J.. 1996. “Indigent Defense.” Bureau of Justice Statistics. NCJ-158909.
Songer, Donald R. 1987. “The Impact of the Supreme Court on Trends in Economic Policy Making in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Politics 49(3):830–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, Donald R 1988. “Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Impact: Miranda in Five State Courts.” American Politics Research 16:245–444.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cameron, Charles M.. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 673–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, Donald R. and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 1990. “Supreme Court Impact on Compliance and Outcomes: Miranda and New York Times in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Western Political Quarterly 43(2):297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spangenberg, Robert L. and Beeman, Marea L.. 1995. “Indigent Defense Systems in the United States.” Law and Contemporary Problems 58(1):31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Specter, Arlen. 1962. “Mapp v. Ohio: Pandora's Problems for the Prosecutor.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 111:4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiotto, James E. 1973. “Search and Seizure: An Empirical Study of the Exclusionary Rule and Its Alternatives.” Journal of Legal Studies 2(1):243–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spriggs, James F. 1997. “Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions.” Political Research Quarterly 50(3):567–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, Otis H. Jr. 1965. “Police Interrogation and the Supreme Court: An Inquiry into the Limits of Judicial Policy-Making.” Journal of Public Law 17:241–57.Google Scholar
Strazzella, James A. 1977. “Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: New Uses, New Problems.” Arizona Law Review 19:443–84.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis. 1945. Democracy in America, Volume I. New York: Random House, Inc.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Twetten, Daniel. 2000. “Public Law 280 and the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act: Could Two Wrongs Ever Be Made into a Right?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 90(4):1317–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchida, Craig D. and Bynum, Timothy S.. 1991. “Search Warrants, Motions to Suppress and ‘Lost Cases’: The Effects of the Exclusionary Rule in Seven Jurisdictions.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 81(4):1034–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,U.S. Congress. House. 1995. Proposed Legislation: “The Gun-Free School Zones Amendments Act of 1995.” 104th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 104–72.
,United States Commission on Civil Rights. 2005. “Federal Procurement after Adarand.”Washington: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.Google Scholar
Zwaluwenburg, , Joy, Pamela. 2004. Wide Awake or Sound Asleep? Universities and the Implementation of Rosenberger v. University of Virginia. Dissertation, Miami University, 2004.Google Scholar
Wald, Michael S., Ayres, Richard, Hess, David W., Schantz, Michael, and Whitebread, Charles H.II. 1967. “Interrogations in New Haven: The Impact of Miranda.” Yale Law Journal 76:1519–648.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1999. Law and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, James D. 1994. “Response to Croson.” Public Administration Review 54(5): 483–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasby, Stephen L. 1970. The Impact of the United States Supreme Court: Some Perspectives. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
Wasby, Stephen L 1976. Small Town Police and the Supreme Court. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Way, H. Frank. 1968. “Survey Research on Judicial Decisions: The Prayer and Bible Reading Cases.” Western Political Quarterly 21(2):189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayne, Stephen J. 1978. The Legislative Presidency. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Herbert. 1959. “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law.” Harvard Law Review 73:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetstein, Matthew E. 1995. “The Abortion Rate Paradox: The Impact of National Policy Change on Abortion Rates.” Social Science Quarterly 76(3):607–18.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2001. “Once More Unto the Breach: Post-Behavioralist Approachesto Judicial Politics.” Law & Social Inquiry 25: 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, Keith E 2005. “‘Interpose Your Friendly Hand’: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 99(4):583–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, Keith E 2007. Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History. Princeton University Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Matthew E. K. Hall, St Louis University, Missouri
  • Book: The Nature of Supreme Court Power
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933943.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Matthew E. K. Hall, St Louis University, Missouri
  • Book: The Nature of Supreme Court Power
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933943.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Matthew E. K. Hall, St Louis University, Missouri
  • Book: The Nature of Supreme Court Power
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933943.017
Available formats
×